I'm struggling to figure out how to do this. Hope anyone can help :)
I have multiple controllers in my Angular app. Like titleCtrl and SettingsCtrl
I have a service which holds a variable like this:
var myVar = {title: 'test', settings: {color: 'black', font: 'verdana'}};
I'm making a $http.get request to update the "myVar" variable from the server.
The question is, how do I update the $scope.title in titleCtrl and $scope.settings in SettingsCtrl AFTER the http request has finished? I know how to do it in a single controller, but how do I update the $scopes in multiple controllers?
Use a watch on that variable in the service. When its updated, then update your values in controller scope. Here's an example:
Inside your controller, you can watch a var myVar on YourService and when it changes, update a variable called myVarInController with the value it changed to.
$scope.$watch(
// This function returns the value being watched.
function() {
return YourService.myVar;
},
// This is the change listener, called when the value returned above changes
function(newValue, oldValue) {
if ( newValue !== oldValue ) {
$scope.myVarInController = newValue;
}
}
);
Just in you service create a object when you get data from you server copy it to that object, so all your controllers can reference to that object.
Please see here http://plnkr.co/edit/j25GJLTHlzTEVS8HNqcA?p=preview
JS:
var app = angular.module('plunker', []);
app.service('dataSer', function($http) {
var obj = {};
getData = function() {
$http.get("test.json").then(function(response) {
angular.copy(response.data, obj);
});
}
return {
obj: obj,
getData: getData
};
});
app.controller('MainCtrl', function($scope, dataSer) {
$scope.data = dataSer;
$scope.get = function() {
$scope.data.getData()
}
});
app.controller('SecondCtrl', function($scope, dataSer) {
$scope.data = dataSer;
});
HTML:
<div ng-controller="MainCtrl">
<button ng-click="get()">get data</button>
<p>Fist Controller:
<br/>{{ data.obj.title}}</p>
</div>
<div ng-controller="SecondCtrl">
<p>Second Controller:
<br/>{{data.obj.settings}}</p>
</div>
Use both factory and service to pass value to two controllers. This is the only way to pass value
angular.module('mulipleCtrlApp', [])
.service('shareService', function () {
return {
title: 'test',
settings: {
color: 'black',
font: 'verdana'
}
};
})
.controller('titleCtrl', function ($scope, shareService) {
$scope.myVar = shareService;
$scope.testchange = function () {
$scope.myVar.title = 'Completed test';
};
})
.controller('settingCtrl', function ($scope, shareService) {
$scope.myVar = shareService;
});
Egghead Link
Jsfiddler Link example
Make your service return promise object.
Then in controller you can define a success call back to fetch title in one and settings in
another controller once the promise is resolved.
Code to use promises
In your service class:
var factory = {};
var factory.fetchData = function () {
return $http({method: 'GET', url: '/someUrl'});
}
return factory;
In controller 1:
$scope.getData = function(){
factory.fetchData().success(response){
$scope.title = response.title;
}
}
Similarly you can update controller 2, to set settings data.
I've found a better and easier maintainable solution in my opinion. Simply do the following to achieve to-way data-binding between one (or more) controller(s) with a service:
Lets assume you fetch (i.e. $http) and store data in your service (serviceName) in the variable serviceData.
In your controller reference the service like this to achieve to-way data-binding:
$scope.data = serviceName
In your view/html bind to the data properties like this:
<input ng-model="data.serviceData.title">
Thats it! :) When your serviceData variable updates the view/scope does as well. This will work with multiple controllers.
Related
I am trying to set http request data in one controller and let the data be used in multiple controller. I have something like
My services
angular.module('myApp').service('testService', ['Product','$q',
function(Product, $q) {
var products, targetProduct;
var deferred = $q.defer();
Product.query({
Id: 123
}, function(products) {
targetProduct = products[0];
deferred.resolve(products);
})
var getTargetProduct = function() {
var deferredtwo = $q.defer();
// return deferredtwo.promise;
deferred.promise.then(function(){
deferredtwo.resolve(targetProduct);
})
return deferredtwo.promise;
}
var setTargetProduct = function(targetProduct) {
targetProduct = targetProduct
}
return {
setTargetProduct: setTargetProduct,
getTargetProduct: getTargetProduct,
productPromise : deferred.promise
};
}
]);
nav controller
testService.productPromise.then(function(products){
$scope.products= products;
$scope.targetProduct = products[0];
})
//when user click the project ng-click = setTargetProduct(product);
$scope.setTargetProduct = function(targetProduct) {
testService.setTargetProduct(targetProduct)
}
product detail controller
testService.getTargetProduct().then(function(targetProduct) {
// works when page first loads
// but I don't know how to update the targetProduct when user select different
//targetProduct which means they trigger setTargetProduct() method
$scope.targetProduct = targetProduct;
})
As I stated above, I am not sure how to update the targetProduct in product detail controller when user pick another targetProduct. Can anyone help me about this? Thanks a lot!
As a matter of style, the function getTargetProduct doesn't need all this boilerplate code with promises. You want to return a simple promise wrapping your local data targetProduct. The function can be much cleaner :
var getTargetProduct = function() {
return $q.when(targetProduct);
}
Note: In the following, for convenience purpose, I will refer to your service testService by the name productService, and I will refer to your controller navController by the name ProductController
The controller NavController (gets the products as follows :
productService.getProducts().then(function(products) {
$scope.products = products;
}
When the user sets a target product (unchanged) :
$scope.setTargetProduct = function(targetProduct) {
testService.setTargetProduct(targetProduct)
}
Solution 1: nested controllers
If ProductDetailController is a nested controller of ProductController, the data targetProduct is shared without any logic from your part.
Solution 2: controllers not linked by a parent-child relationship
If the two controllers are not linked by a parent-child relationship, you can use $broadcast for broadcasting an updateTargetProduct event, and $on for handling that event.
In the controller from which we set the target product, we will find :
$rootScope.$broadcast('updateTargetProduct', targetProduct);
Note : $broadcast will broadcast the event from the rootscope down to the child scopes.
And in ProductDetailController, we will listen for this event :
$scope.$on('updateTargetProduct', function(event, data) {
// play with the received data
}
maybe your situation is not same as like me , but i made a service for my own $http call
var myService = angular.module('apix',[]);
myService.service('api',function( $http ){
this.http = function( method , path , data ){
return $http({
method: method,
url: path,
headers: {
'Content-Type' : 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'
},
data : jQuery.param(data)
});
}
});
and used to call this as like
api.http('POST','your_path', data).success(function(result){ });
angular.module('myApp', [])
.factory('ipFactory', ['$http',
function($http) {
var service = {
getIp: function() {
return $http.get('http://ip.jsontest.com/', {
cache: true
})
.then(function(data) {
return data.data.ip;
});
}
}
return service;
}
])
.controller('ControllerOne', ['$scope', 'ipFactory',
function($scope, ipFactory) {
ipFactory.getIp()
.then(function(ip) {
$scope.ipAddress = ip;
});
}
])
.controller('ControllerTwo', ['$scope', 'ipFactory',
function($scope, ipFactory) {
ipFactory.getIp()
.then(function(ip) {
$scope.ipAddress = ip;
});
}
]);
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.2.23/angular.min.js"></script>
<body ng-app="myApp">
<div ng-controller="ControllerOne">
{{ipAddress}}
</div>
<div ng-controller="ControllerTwo">
{{ipAddress}}
</div>
</body>
I've ran into problem with ng-controller and 'resolve' functionality:
I have a controller that requires some dependency to be resolved before running, it works fine when I define it via ng-route:
Controller code looks like this:
angular.module('myApp')
.controller('MyController', ['$scope', 'data', function ($scope, data) {
$scope.data = data;
}
]
);
Routing:
...
.when('/someUrl', {
templateUrl : 'some.html',
controller : 'MyController',
resolve : {
data: ['Service', function (Service) {
return Service.getData();
}]
}
})
...
when I go to /someUrl, everything works.
But I need to use this controller in other way(I need both ways in different places):
<div ng-controller="MyController">*some html here*</div>
And, of course, it fails, because 'data' dependency wasn't resolved. Is there any way to inject dependency into controller when I use 'ng-controller' or I should give up and load data inside controller?
In the below, for the route resolve, we're resolving the promise and wrapping the return data in an object with a property. We then duplicate this structure in the wrapper service ('dataService') that we use for the ng-controller form.
The wrapper service also resolves the promise but does so internally, and updates a property on the object we've already returned to be consumed by the controller.
In the controller, you could probably put a watcher on this property if you wanted to delay some additional behaviours until after everything was resolved and the data was available.
Alternatively, I've demonstrated using a controller that 'wraps' another controller; once the promise from Service is resolved, it then passes its own $scope on to the wrapped controller as well as the now-resolved data from Service.
Note that I've used $timeout to provide a 1000ms delay on the promise return, to try and make it a little more clear what's happening and when.
angular.module('myApp', ['ngRoute'])
.config(function($routeProvider) {
$routeProvider
.when('/', {
template: '<h1>{{title}}</h1><p>{{blurb}}</p><div ng-controller="ResolveController">Using ng-controller: <strong>{{data.data}}</strong></div>',
controller: 'HomeController'
})
.when('/byResolve', {
template: '<h1>{{title}}</h1><p>{{blurb}}</p><p>Resolved: <strong>{{data.data}}</strong></p>',
controller: "ResolveController",
resolve: {
dataService: ['Service',
function(Service) {
// Here getData() returns a promise, so we can use .then.
// I'm wrapping the result in an object with property 'data', so we're returning an object
// which can be referenced, rather than a string which would only be by value.
// This mirrors what we return from dataService (which wraps Service), making it interchangeable.
return Service.getData().then(function(result) {
return {
data: result
};
});
}
]
}
})
.when('/byWrapperController', {
template: '<h1>Wrapped: {{title}}</h1><p>{{blurb}}</p><div ng-controller="WrapperController">Resolving and passing to a wrapper controller: <strong>{{data.data ? data.data : "Loading..."}}</strong></div>',
controller: 'WrapperController'
});
})
.controller('HomeController', function($scope) {
$scope.title = "ng-controller";
$scope.blurb = "Click 'By Resolve' above to trigger the next route and resolve.";
})
.controller('ResolveController', ['$scope', 'dataService',
function($scope, dataService) {
$scope.title = "Router and resolve";
$scope.blurb = "Click 'By ng-controller' above to trigger the original route and test ng-controller and the wrapper service, 'dataService'.";
$scope.data = dataService;
}
])
.controller('WrapperController', ['$scope', '$controller', 'Service',
function($scope, $controller, Service) {
$scope.title = "Resolving..."; //this controller could of course not show anything until after the resolve, but demo purposes...
Service.getData().then(function(result) {
$controller('ResolveController', {
$scope: $scope, //passing the same scope on through
dataService: {
data: result
}
});
});
}
])
.service('Service', ['$timeout',
function($timeout) {
return {
getData: function() {
//return a test promise
return $timeout(function() {
return "Data from Service!";
}, 1000);
}
};
}
])
// our wrapper service, that will resolve the promise internally and update a property on an object we can return (by reference)
.service('dataService', function(Service) {
// creating a return object with a data property, matching the structure we return from the router resolve
var _result = {
data: null
};
Service.getData().then(function(result) {
_result.data = result;
return result;
});
return _result;
});
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.2.27/angular.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.2.27/angular-route.min.js"></script>
<div ng-app="myApp">
By ng-controller |
By Resolve |
By Wrapper Controller
<div ng-view />
</div>
Create a new module inside which you have the service to inject like seen below.
var module = angular.module('myservice', []);
module.service('userService', function(Service){
return Service.getData();
});
Inject newly created service module inside your app module
angular.module('myApp')
.controller('MyController', ['$scope', 'myservice', function ($scope, myservice) {
$scope.data = data;
// now you can use new dependent service anywhere here.
}
]
);
You can use the mechanism of the prototype.
.when('/someUrl', {
template : '<div ng-controller="MyController" ng-template="some.html"></div>',
controller: function (data) {
var pr = this;
pr.data = data;
},
controllerAs: 'pr',
resolve : {
data: ['Service', function (Service) {
return Service.getData();
}]
}
})
angular.module('myApp')
.controller('MyController', ['$scope', function ($scope) {
$scope.data = $scope.pr.data; //magic
}
]
);
Now wherever you want to use
'<div ng-controller="MyController"></div>'
you need to ensure that there pr.data in the Scope of the calling controller. As an example uib-modal
var modalInstance = $modal.open({
animation: true,
templateUrl: 'modal.html',
resolve: {
data: ['Service', function (Service) {
return Service.getData();
}]
},
controller: function ($scope, $modalInstance, data) {
var pr = this;
pr.data = data;
pr.ok = function () {
$modalInstance.close();
};
},
controllerAs:'pr',
size:'sm'
});
modal.html
<script type="text/ng-template" id="modal.html">
<div class="modal-body">
<div ng-include="some.html" ng-controller="MyController"></div>
</div>
<div class="modal-footer">
<button class="btn btn-primary pull-right" type="button" ng-click="pr.ok()">{{ 'ok' | capitalize:'first'}}</button>
</div>
</script>
And now you can use $scope.data = $scope.pr.data; in MyController
pr.data is my style. You can rewrite the code without PR.
the basic principle of working with ng-controller described in this video https://egghead.io/lessons/angularjs-the-dot
Presuming that Service.getData() returns a promise, MyController can inject that Service as well. The issue is that you want to delay running the controller until the promise resolves. While the router does this for you, using the controller directly means that you have to build that logic.
angular.module('myApp')
.controller('MyController', ['$scope', 'Service', function ($scope, Service) {
$scope.data = {}; // default values for data
Service.getData().then(function(data){
// data is now resolved... do stuff with it
$scope.data = data;
});
}]
);
Now this works great when using the controller directly, but in your routing example, where you want to delay rendering a page until data is resolved, you are going to end up making two calls to Service.getData(). There are a few ways to work around this issue, like having Service.getData() return the same promise for all caller, or something like this might work to avoid the second call entirely:
angular.module('myApp')
.controller('MyController', ['$scope', '$q', 'Service', function ($scope, $q, Service) {
var dataPromise,
// data might be provided from router as an optional, forth param
maybeData = arguments[3]; // have not tried this before
$scope.data = {}; //default values
// if maybeData is available, convert it to a promise, if not,
// get a promise for fetching the data
dataPromise = !!maybeData?$q.when(maybeData):Service.getData();
dataPromise.then(function(data){
// data is now resolved... do stuff with it
$scope.data = data;
});
}]
);
I was trying to solve the problem using ng-init but came across the following warnings on angularjs.org
The only appropriate use of ngInit is for aliasing special properties
of ngRepeat, as seen in the demo below. Besides this case, you should
use controllers rather than ngInit to initialize values on a scope.
So I started searching for something like ng-resolve and came across the following thread:
https://github.com/angular/angular.js/issues/2092
The above link consists of a demo fiddle that have ng-resolve like functionality. I think ng-resolve can become a feature in the future versions of angular 1.x. For now we can work around with the directive mentioned in the above link.
'data' from route resolve will not be available for injection to a controller activated other than route provider. it will be available only to the view configured in the route provider.
if you want the data to the controller activated directly other than routeprovider activation, you need to put a hack for it.
see if this link helps for it:
http://www.johnpapa.net/route-resolve-and-controller-activate-in-angularjs/
Getting data in "resolve" attribute is the functionality of route (routeProvider) , not the functionality of controller.
Key( is your case : 'data') in resolve attribute is injected as service.
That's why we are able fetch data from that service.
But to use same controller in different place , you have fetch data in controller.
Try this
Service:
(function() {
var myService = function($http) {
var getData = function() {
//return your result
};
return {
getData:getData
};
};
var myApp = angular.module("myApp");
myApp.factory("myService", myService);
}());
Controller:
(function () {
var myApp = angular.module("myApp");
myApp.controller('MyController', [
'$scope', 'myService', function($scope, myService) {
$scope.data = myService.getData();
}
]);
//Routing
.when('/someUrl', {
templateUrl : 'some.html',
controller : 'MyController',
resolve : {
data: $scope.data,
}
})
}());
I am very new to angularjs and am having a hard time trying to figure out this issue.
Basically, we are using a factory to request data for our application. When the factory returns a promise, we were hoping that the data inside the returned promise that was defined in our scope, would be able to be used, but it is only returning as text on the page.
For example: We have defined $scope.name in our controller:
app.controller('AccountController',function($scope,Account) {
$scope.name = 'Abby';
$scope.news = [];
Account.getSnapshot().success(function(data) {
$scope.news.push(data);
});
});
so the factory (getSnapshot) will return something like "Hello {{name}}" from an $http request as follows:
app.factory('Account',function($http) {
return {
getSnapshot : function() {
return $http.get('data.php');
}
}
});
Is it possible to allow the factory to access /use {{name}} from the $scope?
You will need to use internal Angular $interpolate service:
app.controller('AccountController', function($scope, $interpolate, Account) {
$scope.name = 'Abby';
$scope.news = [];
Account.getSnapshot().success(function(data) {
var text = $interpolate(data)($scope);
$scope.news.push(text);
});
});
Use $q and promises thanks to #dfsq's answer on my post similar to this. Works perfectly.
Here's a plunker.
// Factory method.
app.factory('Account', function($http, $q) {
var data;
return {
getSnapshot: function() {
return data ? $q.when(data) : $http.get('data.json').then(function(response) {
data = response.data;
return data;
})
}
}
});
// Controller method.
app.controller('AccountController', function($scope, Account) {
$scope.name = 'Abby';
$scope.news = [];
Account.getSnapshot().then(function(data) {
$scope.news = data;
});
});
I have a service which I would like to use across multiple controllers. The services is defined like this:
app.factory('Data', ['$http',
function($http) {
var Data = this;
var theProduct = {};
return {
product: function() {
return theProduct;
},
getProduct: function(ext_id) {
return $http.post('get_product', {
product_id: ext_id
}).success(function(data) {
theProduct = data;
});
}
}
}
]);
I have a form, that uses the ProductFormController to retrieve product data when it's submitted. That controller looks like this:
app.controller('ProductFormController', ['$scope', '$http', 'Data',
function($scope, $http, Data) {
/*
* Get a product and all of it's data from the server
*/
$scope.getProduct = function() {
Data.getProduct($scope.extProductId).success(function(data) {
console.log(data);
});
}
}
]);
Then, I have an AppController, which should display certain sections when a product object exists in the Data service.
<div class="row" id="productInfo" ng-show="product().id" ng-controller="AppController">/div>
Within AppController, I have this line:
$scope.product = Data.product;
I would like the productInfo div to show whenever a product object exists in the Data service, but it seems that the variable never gets updated. I've seen this question, but do not believe the accepted answer actually answers the question:
Angular: share asynchronous service data between controllers
From this stackoverflow question, my understanding is that I should be using services to pass data between controllers.
However, as seen in my example JSFiddle, I am having trouble listening to changes to my service when it is modified across controllers.
angular.module('myApp', [])
.controller('Ctrl1', function ($scope, App) {
$scope.status = App.data.status;
$scope.$watch('App.data.status', function() {
$scope.status = App.data.status;
});
})
.controller('Ctrl2', function ($scope, App) {
$scope.status = App.data.status;
$scope.$watch('status', function() {
App.data.status = $scope.status;
});
})
.service('App', function () {
this.data = {};
this.data.status = 'Good';
});
In my example, I am trying to subscribe to App.data.status in Ctrl1, and I am trying to publish data from Ctrl1 to App. However, if you try to change the input box in the div associated with Ctrl2, the text does not change across the controller boundary across to Ctrl1.
http://jsfiddle.net/VP4d5/2/
Here's an updated fiddle. Basically if you're going to share the same data object between two controllers from a service you just need to use an object of some sort aside from a string or javascript primitive. In this case I'm just using a regular Object {} to share the data between the two controllers.
The JS
angular.module('myApp', [])
.controller('Ctrl1', function ($scope, App) {
$scope.localData1 = App.data;
})
.controller('Ctrl2', function ($scope, App) {
$scope.localData2 = App.data;
})
.service('App', function () {
this.data = {status:'Good'};
});
The HTML
<div ng-controller="Ctrl1">
<div> Ctrl1 Status is: {{status}}
</div>
<div>
<input type="text" ng-model="localData1.status" />
</div>
<div ng-controller="Ctrl2">Ctrl2 Status is: {{status}}
<div>
<input type="text" ng-model="localData2.status" />
</div>
</div>
Nothing wrong with using a service here but if the only purpose is to have a shared object across the app then I think using .value makes a bit more sense. If this service will have functions for interacting with endpoints and the data be sure to use angular.copy to update the object properties instead of using = which will replace the service's local reference but won't be reflected in the controllers.
http://jsfiddle.net/VP4d5/3/
The modified JS using .value
angular.module('myApp', [])
.controller('Ctrl1', function ($scope, sharedObject) {
$scope.localData1 = sharedObject;
})
.controller('Ctrl2', function ($scope, sharedObject) {
$scope.localData2 = sharedObject;
})
.value("sharedObject", {status:'Awesome'});
I agree with #shaunhusain, but I think that you would be better off using a factory instead of a service:
angular.module('myApp', [])
.controller('Ctrl1', function ($scope, App) {
$scope.localData1 = App.data;
})
.controller('Ctrl2', function ($scope, App) {
$scope.localData2 = App.data;
})
.factory('App', function () {
var sharedObj = {
data : {
status: 'Good'
}
};
return sharedObj;
});
Here are some information that might help you understand the differences between a factory and a service: When creating service method what's the difference between module.service and module.factory