In my application we are templating handlebars from client side(we are not templating from server side).So till now we used maintaining all templated inside of the html file using script tag like in the following way.
<script id="selectdropdownTpl_mobile" type="text/x-handlebars-template">
<option value="{{optValue}}" label="{{name}}">{{name}}</option>
</script>
Whenever I want template, I am just compiling and appending compiled result to dom just like following way
var alertCompilation= Handlebars.compile(document.getElementById("selectdropdownTpl_mobile").innerHTML)
alertCompilation({"optValue":"test","name":"firstApp});
Working fine,but what we are thinking to separate all handlebar templates into another file.so it's easy to maintain html file.
Regarding this,I thinking to move all the templates into .js file inside of the file just creating global variable,it is object in the following way.
//fileName test.js
var templates={
"selectdropdownTpl_mobile":"template code"
}
whenever I want, I can access template code like in the following way.
var alertCompilation= Handlebars.compile(templates["selectdropdownTpl_mobile"]);
alertCompilation({"optValue":"test","name":"firstApp});
This way also working fine,What I want to know is this good way or not.If it is not good way How shell do this.
I heard about .hbs file, basically it contains pre-compiler template.It's usefull If I template from server side but in my case templating happening in client side itself.
can anyone suggest me,which way is better.
Related
I am relatively new to HTML/Javascript, and I have a need which I am sure is common, but I don't know the preferred/standard way to handle it.
Basically, I have a web page with Javascript/jQuery code to use AJAX to dynamically change values on a page. I prefer not to encode the AJAX URL statically in the Javascript, but rather be able to pass the URL using Jinja from the Flask application.
So, for example:
$("#inputtext").autocomplete({
source: function (request, response) {
$.getJSON("{{ url_for('main.auto') }}?q=" + request.term,
function(data) { console.log('doing something in the function') }}
The key question is the Jinja template in the middle {{ url_for('main.auto') }}. This correctly renders the route for 'main.auto' if the Javascript code is embedded in the HTML file. However, I prefer to separate the JS from the HTML. So, I took the above code and put it in a separate .js file and imported it into the HTML like this:
<script type="text/javascript" src="{{ url_for('static', filename='js/memberSearch.js') }}"></script>
The above code is in the memberSearch.js file in this example.
When I import the JS code like this, Jinja doesn't render the {{url_for('main.auto')}}. I suppose that this is because Jinja goes through the HTML code first before the JS code is imported.
I found an answer by #martijn-pieters here that lists four methods of passing data from HTML to Javascript:
You can put that information in HTML tags. In the above example, your data is put in the repeated tags.
Or you could add data attributes to your HTML, which are accessible both to Javascript code and to CSS.
Or use AJAX to load data asynchronously; e.g. when you pick an option in the box, use Javascript and AJAX to call a separate
endpoint on your Flask server that serves more data as JSON or
ready-made HTML, then have the Javascript code update your webpage
based on that.
Or generate JSON data and put it directly into your HTML page. Just a some_variable_name = {{datastructure|tojson|safe}};
section is enough; then access that some_variable_name from your
static Javascript code to do interesting things on the page. JSON is a
(almost entirely a) subset of Javascript, and the way the tojson
filter works is guaranteed to produce a Javascript-compatible data
structure for you. The browser will load it just like any other
embedded Javascript code.
Of these methods, I have successfully used the first one by embedding the Jinja template in a element like this, for example:
<input type="hidden" id="urlForPdf" value={{ url_for('main.auto') }}>
Which allows me to access the rendered URL in my JS code.
I have also tried the fourth method of generating JSON directly in JS like this:
<script type="text/javascript">var url = {{ url_for('main.auto')|tojson}}</script>
which allows me to access the variable url from the JS function.
The answer I referred to above also mentions using Data Attributes. I haven't tried this, but I believe it would work as well.
My question, then, is simply whether there is a preferred way of doing something like this? It seems that this must be a very common scenario and I assume that there is some more-or-less standard way of handling this. I'm just not sure which of the four possible solutions is preferred, or if perhaps there is another way altogether.
Thanks in advance for any light you can shed on this.
If I have written jinja2 variables in javascript, for example
var array = [{{count}}...
and it works, will it work even if I move the code to a separate js file? Is there anything else I need to know about this practice?
You can certainly create a Jinja2 template that contains Javascript with Jinja2 variables, render that into a JavaScript file, and serve it to your users. Jinja2 doesn't care what kind of file you are rendering.
An important consideration is that you are changing a static file to a dynamic file. A typical Javascript file is static but you are now making it dynamic which puts additional load on your servers.
A typical solution is to use static JavaScript but render JavaScript data into your HTML page that the JavaScript file can access.
I came across this looking for the same kind of solution, and it was pointed out to me somewhere else that the data attribute in HTML is a good solution here as well.
I have JST template (tpl javascript to create HTML). It's normaly used by the client (in JS). But I want my sever ruby be abble to produce himself the views.
I don't want remake the JST template, converted to ruby because:
1) twice the same code in 2 languages => more maintain/debug
2) twice more work, for same result is waste my time
You will tell me: "just make a ruby template", but I don't want to. I want client auto-generate his HTML. But, for referencement, I need sometimes the ruby server rendering directly HTML and not just JSON, so my question is:
how can I execute JS template with ruby server? Others solutions?
There are multiple ways to tackle this problem:-
1)Use Node Server -Common JS Templates in client and server- HTML rendering as a service from JS template
In your server you can call node service with template name and parameters like to render datepicker you can call http:\localhost/datepicker/date/month/year, since your templates are in JS , Node server will also be able to render those.See dust.js ,it works almost on similar lines.
2)Just maintain 1 server side templates with variable name prefilled
Lets say you template is
<div>My name is ${name}</div>
With this template you can render on server side by providing correct name as "abc" or "def", etc.
When ever client needs template you can send the same template with name parameter as "$$name", and in client js you can replace $$name to the correct name.
Thus maintaining same template on server as well as client.
3)Use some solution similar to google closure
If you were asking the same thing in JSP this was straight forward solution, but you can look for similar thing in ruby world.
I am using Knockoutjs in my asp.net MVC-5 application. I have the following javascript in view:
<script type="text/javascript">
var model = "#Html.Raw(Json.Encode(Model))";
$.get("#Url.Action("_CityPartial")" ...)
//any much more code using similar Html helpers + pure javacsript code.
</script>
Now i want to know, is there any way to transfer this javascript code in a separate js file (keeping Html helpers as it is).
I want to transfer javascript code to separate file because i dont want any user to check my javascript code (using chrome inspect element or any other way).
If the transfer is not possible than please let me know if there is a any way to minifiy the javascript in view itself ??
You could create an external .js file with your code in and pass your serialized json object to it like this:
<script type="text/javascript">
var model = #Html.Raw(Json.Encode(Model));
DoThis(model);
</script>
This has the benefits of keeping the main body of javascript in a separate file.
Any other razor variables can be passed across to the methods defined in the javascript in the same manor as the model has been above.
However as Stanyer mentions this is still javascript and it will run on the client.
You can load it via an external JavaScript file, but unfortunately as JavaScript is a client-side scripting language regardless of whether its loaded inline or externally, the client can still view the code which is being executed on their browser.
You mention minifying - again this can still be interpreted by a client if they really wanted to see your code, but there are many tools online which can minify your JavaScript for you.
Examples:
http://jscompress.com/
http://www.jsmini.com/
No you cant keep the #Html helpers in external javascript file. They are all server side syntax and will be rendered in your HTML page inline.
What maximum you can do is, assign it in a var variable in your page and refer it inside a external page.
I'm searching for the best way to pass data from my razor view to my js file. For example, lets say we have a jquery dialog configured in the js file. For buttons text on this dialog, I would like to localize it (through resource files FR/NL/UK). The translations are available with #UserResource.ButtonDelete + #UserResource.ButtonCancel
Below are the different solutions I see:
Using the nice RazorJS nuget package to allows razor code inside my javascript file. It works pretty well. But the question is: is it a bad practice to compile js files in order to use razor syntax inside the scripts?
Declaring global variables in the js script file and assign value from the view like this:
In the view:
<script>
var labelButtonDelete = #UserResource.ButtonDelete;
</script>
In the js file:
alert('The text for my button is ' + labelButtonDelete);
What is the best way to pass data from razor to js file? Do you have another alternative?
Thanks anyway.
I've been using something like your second approach for some time without any issues. The only difference is that I'm using a singleton in my JS file to avoid polluting the global javascript namespace.
But if you will be doing more serious client side stuff, your Javascript code will follow a more object oriented structure, and from there you almost automatically get a single initialization/constructor path where you can pass your localized values.
That RazorJS looks nice, but I'm not sure if I'm comfortable mixing Javascript with Razor. Might do it for a small project, but I can see it becoming really messy if you have lots of Javascript files.
After all, I still consider the resources/localization code to be related to the view. The Javascript should only implement functionality in my opinion.