This is an age old question, although I wasn't able to find a solution that suited me.
Given a DIV inside a table cell (TD), I want to fill the DIV's height to fit the TD
+-----------+
| TD |
|+---------+|
|| DIV ||
|+---------+|
| |
+-----------+
Only gotchas are:
I don't want to set the height of the parent TD
I want to avoid using Javascript (prefer a CSS only solution)
Keep the resizable nature of the contenteditable DIV
Bonus: get it to work in IE8+ (cross browser solution)
Bonus: use display:flex; - I couldn't work this out, but looks like it should do the trick.
Too much to ask?
Example:
Get the "foo" DIV, to fill 100% height of their parent TD. I got something close to working, but having padding on the DIV element, throws out the borders (using Opera).
/* My Attempt: close, but the padding throws out the borders */
div{
display:inline-block;
height:100%;
width:100%;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/nickg1/g5cpQ/5/
Thanks!
yes, as per you terms and conditions, display:table is the best solution for you.
Add css like this :
div{
display:table;
height: 100%;
border:1px solid red;
}
Check following link for
LIVE DEMO
Try the following:
table {
height: 1px;
}
td {
vertical-align: top;
height: 100%;
}
div{
border:1px solid red;
padding: 2px 4px;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
/* My Attempt: close, but the padding throws out the borders */
div{
display:block;
height: 100%;
}
See demo: http://jsfiddle.net/audetwebdesign/AkjND/
The trick is to specify a height on the table, any small value will do the trick.
If you want to apply vertical padding to the inner div, you need to use box-sizing: border-box, which may work as far back as IE8.
Reference: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/box-sizing
Related
I have a nav bar which has a string of text for a link that opens a dropdown. The parent of this link has overflow: hidden to allow me to truncate the string incase it gets too long. However, I want the dropdown to be positioned absolutely underneath and centered regardless of the width of the parent. Since I'm using overflow: hidden, the dropdown gets cutoff. I want to keep the positioning of the dropdown as well as the overflow properties.
Is there a CSS fix for this? I know I can't ignore the parent's overflow property, but I'd rather not use position: fixed and manipulate margins with JavaScript if possible.
I've made a simple fiddle here
Thanks in advance!
Unfortunately there is no way in CSS to make a child of an overflow: hidden element show its contents outside the parent borders, you must change the hierarchy.
If that is not possible, you could add padding at the bottom to .nav-pull-left that is the size of your dropdown, although that's a rubbish solution..
.nav_pull_left {
width:auto;
height:50px;
padding-bottom: 80px;
overflow:hidden;
float: none;
border: 1px solid black;
white-space: nowrap;
}
You could also use JavaScript to dynamically update the height of your parent container when the dropdown shows but once again, reordering the hierarchy is best and cleanest.
If that is the way you want to go, let me know and I can help :)
May I suggest the following, where you change your css as follows.
.nav_pull_right {
min-height:50px; /* changed height to min-height */
...
}
.nav_pull_left {
min-height:50px; /* changed height to min-height */
...
}
.my_dropdown {
position: relative; /* changed absolute to relative */
margin: 0;
margin-left:-87px;
/* top: 2em; */ /* removed top */
left: 50%;
width: 170px;
z-index: 99999;
border:2px solid #929292;
}
With this your container overflow is kept and gets pushed down, the drop down menu is centered.
Is this something you could use?
Here is a fiddle demo
I'm creating a custom carousel for my current project. Here's a simplified version (only tested in Chrome/Mac):
http://codepen.io/troywarr/pen/LpQzbv
Note that when the carousel scrolls, you can see that each page (1-5) butts up flush against its neighbor on the left and right sides (looking like a single double-thick border). I'd like to add a 5px-wide gutter between the left and right borders of each page so that the borders don't touch.
However, since this is a fluid-width carousel, this has proven to be more difficult than expected.
I need to support IE9+, so I can't rely on calc() values or CSS animations; I'd probably need to do this via jQuery .animate(), but when the horizontal position to which I'm animating is basically 100% + 5px, I can't figure out how to express that in code.
How would I go about that? Is there, perhaps, another clever way to set up the carousel that allows me to use margins, padding, table cell padding, etc. to my benefit? Or, any other ideas? I've played around with different approaches for a couple of hours and I'm running out of ideas.
UPDATE:
Just to clarify what I mean by "gutter" - I'd like there to be a 5px empty gap between the left and right sides of each page in the carousel. Each page should retain its own borders, but there should be empty whitespace between them (only noticeable on scroll). Here's an example that uses calc() and CSS transitions to do exactly what I want (only tested in Chrome):
http://codepen.io/troywarr/pen/GpQYPj
I just need to find a comparable solution that is compatible with IE9+ (which calc() and CSS animations are not).
Applying border-box to everything will allow you to add paddings without breaking the layout.
// See an explanation here:
// http://www.paulirish.com/2012/box-sizing-border-box-ftw/
html {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
*, *:before, *:after {
box-sizing: inherit;
}
EDIT:
Sorry, you were already doing this. Here is my take on it:
.window {
width: 100%;
height: 200px;
overflow: hidden;
position: relative;
// Add these two rules
// The idea is to make a static frame, except for the right column
// which is the one being repainted.
border: 5px solid #666;
border-right: 0;
}
...
.slider li {
float: left;
width: 20%;
height: 100%;
background-color: #ccc;
display: table;
border-right: 5px solid #666; // <- Paint the right column only
}
I have a div that users input text in it. But I want to increase it's width according to it's text, until a max of 50% of the screen. My CSS code:
.messages {
max-width:50%;
min-width:150px;
background: #ffeec0;
padding:2px;
margin:3px;
-webkit-border-radius: 2px;
border-radius: 2px;
border:1px solid #ffdd7c;
}
Result:
There's a lot of space after the "555" message, I want this size only if the user inputs some text like:
So, how can I increase the div's width dinamically, depending on the text size?
There are many ways to achieve this, but IMHO the cleanest is the following.
Your problem is that the boxes are "greedy" and will try to expand to the available width.
To prevent this, you can:
Make it "float: left;"
But also "clear: left;" to prevent additional "left floating" elements to use the available space on the right.
The CSS becomes:
.messages {
max-width:50%;
min-width:150px;
background: #ffeec0;
padding:2px;
margin:3px;
border-radius: 2px;
border:1px solid #ffdd7c;
float: left;
clear: left;
}
I provided full code and additional explanation (on mouseover) on the Liveweave here: http://liveweave.com/DFCZFj
Try changing display type of the div to table.
Example Here
.messages {
display: table;
max-width: 50%;
min-width: 150px;
/* other declarations omitted due to brevity */
}
Just add display:inline;. You can also remove the min width property, otherwise if the text is smaller, you will still have that gap.
Block elements (div's default display type) will attempt to take up the maximum horizontal space of the container. Imagine an implicit width:100% whenever you see them. inline-block will create block level elements in which the next element will attempt to render horizontally adjacent (provided there is enough room). This is what you want to use (display: table will work in this solution as well, but it has its own idiosyncrasies. I avoid them.
So your solution requires three parts:
First, you need to specify that the rows will be no larger than 50% of the available area. You will do this with an outer frame:
.frame {
max-width:50%;
}
Next, the messages themselves should each be given space entire row(s) at a time. So we'll use an undecorated div tag around each message.
Finally, you will use display: inline-block for your innermost messages elements. Since they are the only child of their parent tag, you won't have to worry about elements winding around on one another. By using the inline-block, width is respected and this gives us a great place to apply the background color.
.messages {
display: inline-block;
min-width: 150px;
background: #ffeec0;
padding:2px;
margin:3px;
-webkit-border-radius: 2px;
border-radius: 2px;
border:1px solid #ffdd7c;
}
Just as a reference, one would expect your markup will look like the following:
<div class="frame">
<div><div class="messages">2014</div></div>
<div><div class="messages">2014</div></div>
<div><div class="messages">
2014-09-20 17:46:41 minhavidaemquotes:555
</div></div>
<div><div class="messages">
2014-09-20 17:46:41 minhavidaemquotes:555 this is some extra
text
</div></div>
</div>
I think you'll find this gives you the intended effect. By the way, this is a general solution -- but if you choose a min-width that is larger than 50%, you will ensure that two siblings of type inline-block will be too wide for a line. If you do this, then you can dispense with the extra div in the markup.
The grey border shouldn't be visible, it should be covered by the black border and I don't understand why it won't... here's the CSS code:
#portrait{
width:120px;
height:100px;
top:20px;
border: solid black 1px;
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
cursor:pointer;
}
#prof_picture{
width: inherit;
height: inherit;
border: none;
}
HTML (inside a table):
<td id="portrait">
<img id="prof_picture"></img>
</td>
and javascript
$("#prof_picture").attr('src',"profile/loading.gif");
I had to make the DOM inherit part of the attributes because when using that javascript line the image would assume its natural width and height and I wanted it just to fit the portrait. When I did this, the strange border appeared. Do you know why?
Add font-size: 0; to #portrait{}
Try setting your image to become a block element:
#prof_picture { display:block; }
Alternatively you could set it to align to the bottom (will work only if its an inline (or inline-block) element), although i think there may be cases or environments where this could produce unwanted results.
#prof_picture { vertical-align: bottom; }
Images are, by default (unless specified otherwise), inline elements. Most browsers will reserve some extra space here, but you could also counter this by setting the parent's line-height to zero.
#portrait{
line-height: 0;
}
Setting line-height: 0;, font-size: 0; or display: inline; on #profile Fixes it in the fiddle http://jsfiddle.net/CyV7j/6/
There is 4px of extra space added around the img element because of the way inline elements (line an img) are rendered inside of a table row.
Please consider styling with classes instead of ids. And restricting the use of tables to tabular data and not for the layout of photos.
I suggest you get rid of the border: none; by #prof_picture. You can also try to write the border on #portrait li this
border: 1px solid black;
As it is the right way to write a border.
If you are using certain browsers.... you need to set this in the css:
img{
outline:none;
}
I was hoping you could help me find a solution to a problem I'm having after trying out Matthew James Taylor's equal height columns using pure css.
I'm trying to add a border-bottom to a column when hovered over by the user (see image: 1). The problem I'm having is that as these DIV's are nested the borders seem to stack on top of eachother (see image: 3). I'm trying to have all the borders on an even level as the effect I'm going for would have them overlap with the gray line
Furthermore, the grey horizontal line in the image would stretch to 100% width of the page and would be on an even level with the black border-bottom. When not hovering over any of the titles (hi there!, contact, twitter) I'd like the columns with content to slide up until only the titles are visible, this would be the only thing I'd like to use Javascript. Perhaps all of this isn't possible using just CSS, or maybe there's a better way of doing it?
**
It looks like this would be solved far more easily with display: table than the CSS trickery you are currently using.
http://jsfiddle.net/rrPKA/
#container { display: table; }
.row { display: table-row; }
.row > div {
display: table-cell;
width: 100px;
border-bottom: 1px solid lightgray;
padding-left: 10px;
}
.row > div:hover { border-bottom: 1px solid gray; }