obfuscating whole phonegap angularjs project (all my javascript files) - javascript

I see many obfuscators which always obfuscate only one independed js file.
In my phonegap angularjs project I have many js files (controllers, factories, services) that are in separate files and depends on each other.
Is there a software that will obfuscate all my js files, so that it will not break files that depend on each other?
Thanks

Use grunt and uglify: Nodejs grunt obfuscate
For AngularJS specifically, make sure you read the "Note on minification". You may need to slightly change the way you inject dependencies to avoid them being breaking during obfuscation: https://docs.angularjs.org/tutorial/step_05

Related

How to obfuscating multiple javascript files into one, and still run electron

Problem:
How do I obfuscate multiple javascript files into one javascript file, where I still can run it with Nodejs Electron?
Thoughts:
I know that you can obfuscate all javascript files in an Electron project and still run it, but is it possible to obfuscate all into one main.js?
Running your JS in Electron or in a browser is irrelevant to the concatenation and/or obfuscation. Same with Node.
You can always concatenate your JS project files(i.e. gather all your files in a single JS file). You have plenty build engines for this task, the most popular today being webpack.
As for obfuscation, usually it is already good enough with minification when you allow mangling internal variables (which is the default setting of most minifiers). The most popular today being Uglify, and you can easily combine it with build engines.

Angular App performance with one script file vs many script files

I am working on large scale web app using AngularJs as front-end and Laravel RESTful API as back-end
Currently I am using gulp to concatenate all script files in one file including angular libraries and all modules and controllers and it's about 46,000 line of code.
Is this a good approach regrading performance?, or I've to include all script files separately.
Also Is concatenating some files and including the others is a good approach?
Thanks in advance!
Yes it is a standard approach for production
For development keep seperate files so debugging is a lot easier.
For production it is highly advisable to combine all the files and minify it.
Infact if you use webpack you can have all css , js files in one bundle
Webpack is awesome tool. Gulp would also do the job.

When Should I Combine my JS and CSS Files?

I've been browsing many of the articles here about how and why one should combine JS/CSS files for performance, but none of those articles offered any real guideline as to when is the right time.
I'm developing a single-page microsite that uses seven Javascript files (a mixture of third-party plugins from CDNs and my own files), and eight different CSS files (basically one per plugin, and my own compiled SASS file).
The site loads slowly even on the intranet here; I'm concerned about the performance outside. While searching for several plugins yesterday, I found several CodePen and plugin articles that basically said "cool kids concatenate JS" (literally) which got me thinking about this whole thing.
At what point should I start concatenating and minifying my Javascript/CSS?
And should I paste the CDN scripts into my own JS files, or is it better in the long run to have another HTTP request but use the statically served plugin files?
Edit: Just to clarify - I'm not asking for tools/techniques, but wondering when it becomes important to combine and minify files - should it always been done as #RobG suggested?
You should deliver code to UAT that is as close to production code as possible, including all minification and combining of files. If you don't, then you aren't doing proper UAT
To be honest, it depends.
People are often, wrongly, obsessed with merge-min... That's not always the case. The need for merge-min depends on a few things:
Sometimes it's faster and BETTER practice to load 2 css files than one big one? Why? Because they'll load in parallel. That simple.
So don't go with the merge-min obsession. If your users are returning, daily users, do merge and rely on browser cache. If not, optimise parallel loads by not merging.
And ignore the simplistic: 'yes you must merge because that's what was best 10 years ago and I've never questioned it' :)
When Should I Combine my JS and CSS Files?
Every time you are finished with development. specifically when your code is going to User Acceptance Test (UAT), if not earlier. thanks #RobG for mentioning it.
Which tools do you suggest?
Browserify
Let's Start with your JS files. I think a great tool for bundling various JS files/modules is Browserify.
Browsers don't have the require method defined, but Node.js does. With Browserify you can write code that uses require in the same way that you would use it in Node.
Here is a tutorial on how to use Browserify on the command line to bundle up a simple file called main.js along with all of its dependencies:
var unique = require('uniq');
var data = [1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 5, 6];
console.log(unique(data));
Install the uniq module with npm:
npm install uniq
Now recursively bundle up all the required modules starting at main.js into a single file called bundle.js with the browserify command:
browserify main.js -o bundle.js
Browserify parses the AST for require() calls to traverse the entire dependency graph of your project.
Drop a single tag into your html and you're done!
<script src="bundle.js"></script>
Also there is a tool similer for CSS files called browserify-css.
Gulp
gulp is a toolkit that will help you automate painful or time-consuming tasks in your development workflow. For web development (if that's your thing) it can help you by doing CSS preprocessing, JS transpiling, minification, live reloading, and much more. Integrations are built into all major IDEs and people are loving gulp across PHP, .NET, Node.js, Java, and more. With over 1700 plugins (and plenty you can do without plugins), gulp lets you quit messing with build systems and get back to work.
Public CDN scripts
should I paste the CDN scripts into my own JS files, or is it better in the long run to have another HTTP request but use the statically served plugin files?
You can keep them in public CDN; To avoid needlessly overloading servers, browsers limit the number of connections that can be made simultaneously. Depending on which browser, this limit may be as low as two connections per hostname.
Using a public CDN (like Google AJAX Libraries CDN) eliminates one request to your site, allowing more of your local content to downloaded in parallel. Read more on this here

Django how to deploy css and javascript

What the best way to organize and deploy java-script and css files in django ? The main idea is rather simple - in debug mode use a lot of JS's and in production only one minified java-script . I am think that I 'am inventing a bicycle, trying to reorganize my old project this way, and should be some well known solution for this problem.
Seems I have found what I need - django-pipeline
See Managing static files in official documentation.
In short:
When debugging you can ask Django to serve these files by himself (just put them in one directory and configure STATICFILES_DIRS).
When going into production stage, you should use a real webserver like Apache. (see Deploying static files)
You could collect all static files in a folder (https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/contrib/staticfiles/) and then run requirejs optimiser to minify and merge the js files (http://requirejs.org/docs/optimization.html).

JavaScript styleguide on organizing files

I have worked in a web project with a heavy part on JavaScript, and I have noticed that there was no style how to use JavaScript. What unsettled me most is that everyone added files here and there, which resulted in a mess to organize and deliver them. Because this will be happen in every new project, I would like to have something like a styleguide for JavaScript. This styleguide should address the following questions:
How should JavaScript files be organized in the file system during development?
How should the JavaScript parts be separated from the HTML and other parts of the application?
How should JavaScript files be delivered in the real application, so that less code has to be loaded on each request and not too much requests have to be sent?
Is there something public available as a starting point for developing our own styleguide? What are your experiences in using your styleguide? Are developers following it easily, what are the simple and what are the difficult parts in it?
(I know, more question than one, but I'm interested in the whole story here. As a background, we have used JQuery and JSF, but I don't think that will have an impact on the answer.)
If you're doing heavy client side, you are probably going the MVC way.
So I'll answer your questions with the approach taken by the brunch. Brunch projects use MVC library Backbone.js, and have strict directory structure.
How should JavaScript files be organized in the file system during development?
src/
app/
collections/
controllers/
models/
styles/
templates/
views/
vendor/
build/
web/
config.yaml
Use Stitch to organize your files as CommonJS modules. Then you will be able to use require() to define dependency between them, as well as to combine them into one file later.
How should the JavaScript parts be separated from the HTML and other parts of the application?
build directory is used to store html; build/web is used to store javascript, images, and css.
How should JavaScript files be delivered in the real application, so that less code has to be loaded on each request and not too much requests have to be sent?
At the build stage, all JavaScript is minified and combined into one file (build/web/js/app.js), so that client will have to make only one HTTP request when he / she visits your site for the first time.
It's probably a good idea to make building process as easy as possible. Brunch does that by offering brunch watch command, which monitors filesystem for changes and builds code instantly with the help of Stitch and some other tools.
(It should be noted that during development brunch projects also use CoffeeScript as the primary language; it is transparently compiled by brunch before stitching the resulting JavaScript. However, this doesn't matter as long as file organization is concerned, and is out of scope of your question.)
For all JavaScript files definitely use a separate directory. Have as many files as possible semantically. One large constructor should correspond to a separate file. Never use filename prefixes where you can create a directory.
Unix-style directory structure is often found on GitHub:
src -- for the source JavaScript.
lib -- for libraries.
tests -- for unit tests.
bin -- for executables.
dist -- for compiled files.
For compiling we use a Makefile with targets for production and development. The production version is all of files JSHint`ed, minified and concatenated into one. The development target is generating a server-side script that includes all JavaScript files dynamically (for easy inclusion into HTML).
But generally it depends. We used a widget directory for one project. This widget directory had a set of separate widget subdirectories (e.g. slider, tabs, modal-window), each of which had the following layout (inspired by DOMLoader):
html -- for HTML templates.
css -- for CSS files necessary for the widget.
js -- for the widget JavaScript constructor.
Crockford has a few stylistic guidelines and the Yahoo exceptional performance site has details which might be useful to you.
I can recommend a book: JavaScript Patterns by Stoyan Stefanov.
I think one of the best book about javascript

Categories

Resources