Develop Reference

Is it possible to change the Express Session to a different store after creation

I am using memcached as a backing store for an ExpressJS session - chosen via an app configuration setting. I would like to fall back from memcached to memory if the memcached host cannot be contacted. (This isn't necessarily a production strategy as memcached is very reliable - it's more for when I forget to boot the Docker instance in dev, but could still be a production fail-safe.)
I first thought I could "app.use" a new session instance, and try to remove the first one, but I have read that it's difficult (if possible) to "un-use" Express middleware i.e. to swap the middleware in-place in the chain, or generally tinker with the chain once it's been setup.
The problem there is after the connection timeout period, the app middleware has been setup with many further services installed after the session middleware.
My second thought was can I re-configure the Express Session instance itself and change the store after it's been created? I could not see any way in the documentation.
My third idea was to wrap the express-session in a new "swappable store" class, but I'm wary of the scope of wrapping the entire interface.
For example in my app setup:
app.use(services.session.middleware());
// then a lot of other middleware...
app.use(bodyParser.json());
app.use(bodyParser.urlencoded({extended: false}));
app.use(cookieParser());
app.use(express.static(path.join(rootPath, 'public')));
...etc
And in the session service, which selects and configures the session instance:
function middleware() {
// default / Memory Store options
const opts = {
resave: false,
saveUninitialized: false,
...etc
}
};
// Install any configured backing store
if(config.session.storage === "memcached"){
const MemcachedStore = require('connect-memcached')(session);
opts.proxy = 'true';
opts.store = new MemcachedStore({
hosts: ...,
secret: ...
});
const errorHandler = (type, details)=> {
/* HERE I WOULD LIKE TO RE-MAKE THE SESSION USING MEMORY
* AND DISCARD THE MEMCACHED ONE
* (THIS HAPPENS AFTER APP BOOT HAS FINISHED)
*/
console.error( String.format("Memcached {3} with host:{0} details:{1}.", details.server, details.messages.join( '' ), type));
}
opts.store.client.on('failure', details => errorHandler('failure', details));
opts.store.client.on('issue', details => errorHandler('issue', details));
}
return session(opts);
}

I think there are several approaches you can try for this. The first is to configure a storage system based on which configuration you have supplied on startup (probably via a module like config or nconf). The second is to run a quick check when booting up the app to make sure it can access the memcache service, and if it can't then fallback to memory with an error.
I would be fairly weary of doing either of these, since you're using docker and it should be easy to boot memcache. This is because you'll be introducing code which might trigger in production should there be some connection issue, and then you might find yourself accidentally serving sessions out of memory rather than something like memcache potentially without realising.
I'll expand on both strategies here and provide a third possibly better option.
1. Choose the cache system based on a config
This should be fairly straight forward, simply extract your configuration into some sort of config manager / environment variables (checkout config or nconf). When starting the application and connecting your session middleware, you can pull out all the possibly configurations, see which exist and attach one based on that. This is similar to how your if (config.session.storage === 'memcache") looks at the moment. Just use a fallback of not configuring one and the express-session middleware will fall back to memory. This way you can leave out the configuration completely and just always use memory for development.
2. Run a test before connecting to the desired service
In combination with the above, if memcache details are provided you could run a quick test by attempting to store something in memcache on startup. Perhaps new Date(); to signal when the application booted up? If this throws an error, then just don't attach the MemcachedStore to the express-session options and you can safely destroy the MemcachedStore.
3. Throw an error if you cannot connect to Memcached
This is in further combination to #2. If you identify that memcache configurations are provided, then I would personally do a check to see if you can contact the serivce and if not then throw an error and stop the application. This would mean that in development you immedietely know the issue, and in production you would as well and can trigger automatic alerts for yourself based on the fact that the application failed to start.
This is probably the best and most robust solution, generally doing a silent fallback is not a great idea when talking about connected services as things can go wrong and you have no idea. I appreciate that this is for development purposes and you need to be pragmatic, but if it saves you accidentally serving all sessions from your servers memory then this would be super beneficial.

Getting initial state using HTML5 history api

Everything I've been searching for is just a tutorial how to use pushState, replaceState, history.state, etc. Those concepts are simple but one thing I'm wondering how people solve is how to know what the initial state is.
Say you SPA is hosted at https://example.com/en-us/myapp/. Go there and your home page of the app is loaded, click around and it does a pushState to see you to https://example.com/en-us/myapp/get/users. Great, now you see a list of users and thanks to the history api, it wasn't an actual page load.
But now let's pretend a user had that https://example.com/en-us/myapp/get/users state bookmarked and the started the app off at this URL. Ok, so your server listens to that and serves up the app. My question is, how do you know that get/users is the current state and you need to show the associated view? Do you just know that your app is hosted at https://example.com/en-us/myapp/ and so you get whatever is after that to know?
Something like this:
function getState (uri) {
return uri.match(/^https:\/{2}(?:w{3}\.)?example.com\/en-us\/myapp\/?(.*)/i)[1];
}
var state = getState(location.href);
and if state is falsey then load the initial view, otherwise handle the state and show the list of users when state === 'get/users'?

Yes, that is quite right. However, you could try using location.pathname to fetch the state, so that your regex does not need to include the domain name.
For example:
function getState (uri){
var path = uri.split("myapp", 2)[1]; // This will split the pathname after 'myapp'
console.log(path) // Just for debugging purposes
// Now we can decide what to do with the path (i.e. "/get/users")
// For example, we can use a switch or a simple if statement
if (path === '/get/users'){
return true
} else {
return false
}
}
var state = getState(location.pathname);
That is just a simple example of a router. You can now try building your very own router for your SPA. Also, there are many libraries out there for you to use if you would like a different approach. You can take a look at these ones if you would like.
navigo
router.js
Also, if you are using a framework to build your SPA, they often have their own routing ability built in. These are just some of the many frameworks that have routers built in. (Sorry, I've <10 reputation so I'm not allowed more than two links).
Vue.js — vuejs.org/v2/guide/routing.html
Mithril.js — mithril.js.org/#routing
Ember.js — guides.emberjs.com/v2.13.0/routing/
Of course, it is ultimately your choice which to use. You could expand upon the example I've provided, by simply implementing a switch for different links/pages in your SPA. I wish you the best with your app!

Torii provider name from adapter?

I have a Torii adapter that is posting my e.g. Facebook and Twitter authorization tokens back to my API to establish sessions. In the open() method of my adapter, I'd like to know the name of the provider to write some logic around how to handle the different types of providers. For example:
// app/torii-adapters/application.js
export default Ember.Object.extend({
open(authorization) {
if (this.provider.name === 'facebook-connect') {
var provider = 'facebook';
// Facebook specific logic
var data = { ... };
}
else if (this.provider.name === 'twitter-oauth2') {
var provider = 'twitter';
// Twitter specific logic
var data = { ... };
}
else {
throw new Error(`Unable to handle unknown provider: ${this.provider.name}`);
}
return POST(`/api/auth/${provider}`, data);
}
}
But, of course, this.provider.name is not correct. Is there a way to get the name of the provider used from inside an adapter method? Thanks in advance.
UPDATE: I think there are a couple ways to do it. The first way would be to set the provider name in localStorage (or sessionStorage) before calling open(), and then use that value in the above logic. For example:
localStorage.setItem('providerName', 'facebook-connect');
this.get('session').open('facebook-connect');
// later ...
const providerName = localStorage.getItem('providerName');
if (providerName === 'facebook-connect') {
// ...
}
Another way is to create separate adapters for the different providers. There is code in Torii to look for e.g. app-name/torii-adapters/facebook-connect.js before falling back on app-name/torii-adapters/application.js. I'll put my provider-specific logic in separate files and that will do the trick. However, I have common logic for storing, fetching, and closing the session, so I'm not sure where to put that now.
UPDATE 2: Torii has trouble finding the different adapters under torii-adapters (e.g. facebook-connect.js, twitter-oauth2.js). I was attempting to create a parent class for all my adapters that would contain the common functionality. Back to the drawing board...
UPDATE 3: As #Brou points out, and as I learned talking to the Torii team, fetching and closing the session can be done—regardless of the provider—in a common application adapter (app-name/torii-adapters/application.js) file. If you need provider-specific session-opening logic, you can have multiple additional adapters (e.g. app-name/torii-adapters/facebook-oauth2.js) that may subclass the application adapter (or not).
Regarding the session lifecycle in Torii: https://github.com/Vestorly/torii/issues/219
Regarding the multiple adapters pattern: https://github.com/Vestorly/torii/issues/221
Regarding the new authenticatedRoute() DSL and auto-sesssion-fetching in Torii 0.6.0: https://github.com/Vestorly/torii/issues/222
UPDATE 4: I've written up my findings and solution on my personal web site. It encapsulates some of the ideas from my original post, from #brou, and other sources. Please let me know in the comments if you have any questions. Thank you.

I'm not an expert, but I've studied simple-auth and torii twice in the last weeks. First, I realized that I needed to level up on too many things at the same time, and ended up delaying my login feature. Today, I'm back on this work for a week.
My question is: What is your specific logic about?
I am also implementing provider-agnostic processing AND later common processing.
This is the process I start implementing:
User authentication.
Basically, calling torii default providers to get that OAuth2 token.
User info retrieval.
Getting canonical information from FB/GG/LI APIs, in order to create as few sessions as possible for a single user across different providers. This is thus API-agnotic.
➜ I'd then do: custom sub-providers calling this._super(), then doing this retrieval.
User session fetching or session updates via my API.
Using the previous canonical user info. This should then be the same for any provider.
➜ I'd then do: a single (application.js) torii adapter.
User session persistence against page refresh.
Theoretically, using simple-auth's session implementation is enough.
Maybe the only difference between our works is that I don't need any authorizer for the moment as my back-end is not yet secured (I still run local).
We can keep in touch about our respective progress: this is my week task, so don't hesitate!
I'm working with ember 1.13.
Hope it helped,
Enjoy coding! 8-)

How a fully scalable SPA with a solid backend is built

the past few weeks I've been hard at work with Angular, Node, TDD, Heroku, Amazon S3 etc. Trying to get a better picture of how a fully scalable SPA with a solid backend is built, working with grunt, bower, haven't dipped my toes in TDD using Jasmine yet, though I understand how the tests are being made through Karma, this is supposedly my next step.
One thing is sure: IT IS A LOT OF INFORMATION
On to the Questions/Rationale on working with all these technologies.
First things first, I played with
Angular App https://github.com/angular-app/angular-app
NG Boilerplate https://github.com/joshdmiller/ng-boilerplate
and read many dozens of posts etc.
I found NG Boilerplate to be most logical structured (as far as my understanding of these things go).
As a demo project (which evolved from something really small) I want to make a Single Page CRUD Application using:
NodeJS as backend
Express as a web app framework
NG Boilerplate as the Client
The app deployed to Heroku
MongoDB for DB
Amazon S3 for dynamic storage
Now I want to use Angular-Apps's (https://github.com/angular-app/angular-app) server as a backend to my NGBoilerplate kickstarter
I want to know how:
from what I see the client connects directly to MongoDB?
how does the angular client communicate back and forth to express ?
I read an interesting article http://www.espeo.pl/2012/02/26/authentication-in-angularjs-application related to how the authentication works.
Long Story Short, without me asking a ton of questions, could someone please describe in detail the workflow of such an app? Getting the session, login, access to editing the content, tying express routes to angular routes (e.g. X route can be accessed by the admin only) etc. ##
there'a big blur in my head :).

In the last months I played a lot with these issues and questions and I got to the following conclusion:
For my purposes, I needed an app that relies almost entirely on Angular, without a separate backend, and the present backend should be from Angular.
Why? Because I want all of my eggs in one basket, I don’t want to configure a ton of stuff on a lot of different parts.
As a basis for my project I ended up using ng-boilerplate, as a boilerplate :), with some changes to the development process, Grunt tasks etc, this is for everybody to figure out, depending on each particular project.
Well, the main issue I’m gonna touch here is that, for a true backend, made in Angular, we need secure routes and a secure persistence method, a database.
For the app, I took advantage of the ng-boilerplate's modular and dependency aware structure, I think it’s perfect for a Angular app.
Anyhow, I’m gonna take things top to bottom (final product wise, the build env as I said above, it’s up to you, but ng-boilerplate is awesome), here we go.
On the upper layer we have the actual Angular app, made just the way we want
The server container, is a NodeJS server with express and other modules to take PARTIAL care of the routing on different browsers and devices (In my app, I made HTML5 routing that is augmented by express, .htaccess like settings whenever there’s a partial URL it should redirect to index where Angular will read the path requested and zapp you to that location)
For my case, the whole things runs on Heroku, on a Node.JS application, you can install several other things there if you want to.
Now, for the persistency, to have authentication and security, and NOT to rely on backend for that, I am using firebase (https://www.firebase.com/), there’s some great tutorials there to help you going and have true persistence in your Angular APP, with routes when you are logged in, access to custom tables/objects in DB when you are logged in etc. It’s the real deal.
If you don’t want to rely OAuth’s possible sites to log in with (Facebook, github, persona or twitter) and want custom emails and addresses you can do that directly with Firebase, to create accounts and delete them etc.
FIREBASE Angular Backend.
So, Firebase, just like they say on the site is a powerful API to store and sync data in realtime.
I don’t know exactly how to approach this, so I’m gonna start it with creating a Firebase database. Once we create it, in the backend we have several options, one of which is security.
{
"rules": {
".read": true,
".write": "auth != null"
}
}
Here, if we read the documentation on https://www.firebase.com/docs/security/security-rules.html we’ll learn that we can add rules for each ‘table' in our database, so we can have like 3 protected ’table’ objects and some that are not protected.
We can protect tables per user basis, per different rules, if logged in or not, we also have inheritance for rules etc, pleas read the documentation there, it really is a good read.
Now, for these rules to take effect we need to enable the Firebase Simple Login and select the desired login method, from Facebook, Twitter, Github, Persona, Email&Password and Anonymous.
For a real app, we need to write info to DB also as anonymous (user sessions etc) and also as logged (with either of the options above) to store and read information.
Me, I wanted to go the quick easy way and made a Facebook authentication, reading the docs there I made a quick Facebook app, and in the settings of the application on Facebook I’m putting Firebase’s backend https://www.dropbox.com/s/xcd4b8tty1nlbm5/Screenshot%202014-01-22%2013.51.26.png
This gives a interim link to login to Facebook and have access to ’tables’ that are otherwise locked if the rule is auth !=null.
NOW, onto the Angular backend.
Firebase provides a library for us to put in our app, and a SimpleLogin lib, also, for Angular, a factory service called AngularFire.
In my case, I made local firebaseService with use methods that connects to my DB:
angular.module('firebaseService', ['firebase'])
.service('firebaseService', function ($firebase, $rootScope) {
//Input data in Firebase
var URL = "https://glowing-fire-xxxx.firebaseio.com";
var tellFirebase = function(ID, JSON) {
users = $firebase(new Firebase(URL + '/' + ID));
users.details = JSON;
users.$save('details');
};
return {
addUser: function(ID, JSON) {
tellFirebase(ID, JSON);
if ($rootScope.debugStatus === true) {
console.log('Firebase Service .addUSer Called');
}
},
getUser: function(ID) {
if ($rootScope.debugStatus === true) {
console.log('Firebase Service .getUser Called');
}
}
};
})
From here we do our READ/WRITE, on the controller’s page I have this:
It’s worth noticing that I have a middleware service (storageManagement) where I switch between Firebase and MongoDB, to avoid confusion.
.controller( 'SomeCtrl', function SomeController( $scope, storageManagement, $firebase, $firebaseSimpleLogin ) {
/*===========================
* ==== FIREBASE LOGIN
* ===========================*/
var URL = "https://glowing-fire-XXXXX.firebaseio.com";
var users = new Firebase(URL);
$scope.auth = $firebaseSimpleLogin(users, function(error, user){});
if ($scope.auth.user == null) {
//$scope.auth.$login('facebook');
}
console.log($scope.auth);
//$scope.auth.$logout('facebook');
$scope.doLogin = function() {
console.log($scope.facebookemail);
console.log($scope.facebookpassword);
$scope.auth.$login('facebook');
$scope.$on("$firebaseSimpleLogin:login", function(evt, user) {
storageManagement.runFirebase();
});
/* example of logging in while asking access to permissions like email, user_list, friends_list etc.
* auth.$login('facebook', {
rememberMe: true,
scope: 'email,user_likes'
});*/
};
$scope.doLogout = function() {
$scope.auth.$logout();
};
});
I’m adding the $firebase service to my controller, and the $firebaseSimpleLogin one.
This here exposes to scope two buttons, login/logout, that popup the OAuth window from Facebook, with email/password setting you won't need to to go through this I think, for a full understanding please read the full docs at firebase.
SO, once we are logged, we can access tables described in the rules, if we choose email/password, actually even for Facebook or other methods, we can assign certain rules for certain IDENTITIES, so you could have a ADMIN table where you could save settings that get READ on page load to apply whatever you want.
Now, with routes, we can check for the $scope.auth status, if WE PUT IT IN $rootScope, and check for the status when going to a route, if the status checks, we get to that route and it gets populated with stuff from the DB, otherwise, even if someone hacks it’s way to that route it won’t see anything because there are no permissions to read that table for unauthorized/wrong email users.
This is loosely based on this article, http://www.ng-newsletter.com/posts/back-end-with-firebase.html … I had a hard time changing the mindset from what the guy wrote there, but, after ONE WHOLE day, of reading the docs (and setting up middleware, mind you) from Firebase I figured it out, and it works.
The connection to the DB is exposed like one BIG object where you can do whatever operations you want.
This isn't the most complete explanation, but it should get you well on your way to making some awesome things:D

The best example of this that I've come across is called angular-app.
It's very comprehensive and addresses all your needs. It's written by one of the authors of the fantastic book "Mastering Web Application Development with AngularJS".
https://github.com/angular-app/angular-app
From the github repo:
AngularJS CRUD application demo
Purpose
The idea is to demonstrate how to write a typical, non-trivial CRUD application using AngularJS. To showcase AngularJS in its most advantageous environment we've set out to write a simplified project management tool supporting teams using the SCRUM methodology. The sample application tries to show best practices when it comes to: folders structure, using modules, testing, communicating with a REST back-end, organizing navigation, addressing security concerns (authentication / authorization).
We've learned a lot while using and supporting AngularJS on the mailing list and would like to share our experience.
Stack
Persistence store: MongoDB hosted on MongoLab
Backend: Node.js
Awesome AngularJS on the client
CSS based on Twitter's bootstrap
Build
It is a complete project with a build system focused on AngularJS apps and tightly integrated with other tools commonly used in the AngularJS community:
powered by Grunt.js
test written using Jasmine syntax
test are executed by Karma Test Runner (integrated with the Grunt.js build)
build supporting JS, CSS and AngularJS templates minification
Twitter's bootstrap with LESS templates processing integrated into the build
Travis-CI integration

Publish data from browser app without writing my own server

I need users to be able to post data from a single page browser application (SPA) to me, but I can't put server-side code on the host.
Is there a web service that I can use for this? I looked at Amazon SQS (simple queue service) but I can't call their REST APIs from within the browser due to cross origin policy.
I favour ease of development over robustness right now, so even just receiving an email would be fine. I'm not sure that the site is even going to catch on. If it does, then I'll develop a server-side component and move hosts.

Not only there are Web Services, but nowadays there are robust systems that provide a way to server-side some logic on your applications. They are called BaaS or Backend as a Service providers, usually to provide some backbone to your front end applications.
Although they have multiple uses, I'm going to list the most common in my opinion:
For mobile applications - Instead of having to learn an API for each device you code to, you can use an standard platform to store logic and data for your application.
For prototyping - If you want to create a slick application, but you don't want to code all the backend logic for the data -less dealing with all the operations and system administration that represents-, through a BaaS provider you only need good Front End skills to code the simplest CRUD applications you can imagine. Some BaaS even allow you to bind some Reduce algorithms to calls your perform to their API.
For web applications - When PaaS (Platform as a Service) came to town to ease the job for Backend End developers in order to avoid the hassle of System Administration and Operations, it was just logic that the same was going to happen to the Backend. There are many clones that showcase the real power of this strategy.
All of this is amazing, but I have yet to mention any of them. I'm going to list the ones that I know the most and have actually used in projects. There are probably many, but as far as I know, this one have satisfied most of my news, whether it's any of the previously ones mentioned.
Parse.com
Parse's most outstanding features target mobile devices; however, nowadays Parse contains an incredible amount of API's that allows you to use it as full feature backend service for Javascript, Android and even Windows 8 applications (Windows 8 SDK was introduced a few months ago this year).
How does a Parse code looks in Javascript?
Parse works through classes and objects (ain't that beautiful?), so you first create a specific class (can be done through Javascript, REST or even the Data Browser manager) and then you add objects to specific classes.
First, add up Parse as a script tag in javascript:
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.parsecdn.com/js/parse-1.1.15.min.js"></script>
Then, through a given Application ID and a Javascript Key, initialize Parse.
Parse.initialize("APPLICATION_ID", "JAVASCRIPT_KEY");
From there, it's all object manipulation
var Person = Parse.Object.extend("Person"); //Person is a class *cof* uppercase *cof*
var personObject = new Person();
personObject.save({name: "John"}, {
success: function(object) {
console.log("The object with the data "+ JSON.stringify(object) + " was saved successfully.");
},
error: function(model, error) {
console.log("There was an error! The following model and error object were provided by the Server");
console.log(model);
console.log(error);
}
});
What about authentication and security?
Parse has a User based authentication system, which pretty much allows you to store a base of users that can manipulate the data. If map the data with User information, you can ensure that only a given user can manipulate specific data. Plus, in the settings of your Parse application, you can specify that no clients are allowed to create classes, to ensure innecesary calls are performed.
Did you REALLY used in a web application?
Yes, it was my tool of choice for a medium fidelity prototype.
Firebase.com
Firebase's main feature is the ability to provide Real Time to your application without all the hassle. You don't need a MeteorJS server in order to bring Push Notifications to your software. If you know Javascript, you are half way through to bring Real Time magic to your users.
How does a Firebase looks in Javascript?
Firebase works in a REST fashion, and I think they do an amazing job structuring the Glory of REST. As a good example, look at the following Resource structure in Firebase:
https://SampleChat.firebaseIO-demo.com/users/fred/name/first
You don't need to be a rocket scientist to know that you are retrieve the first name of the user "Fred", giving there's at least one -usually there should be a UUID instead of a name, but hey, it's an example, give me a break-.
In order to start using Firebase, as with Parse, add up their CDN Javascript
<script type='text/javascript' src='https://cdn.firebase.com/v0/firebase.js'></script>
Now, create a reference object that will allow you to consume the Firebase API
var myRootRef = new Firebase('https://myprojectname.firebaseIO-demo.com/');
From there, you can create a bunch of neat applications.
var USERS_LOCATION = 'https://SampleChat.firebaseIO-demo.com/users';
var userId = "Fred"; // Username
var usersRef = new Firebase(USERS_LOCATION);
usersRef.child(userId).once('value', function(snapshot) {
var exists = (snapshot.val() !== null);
if (exists) {
console.log("Username "+userId+" is part of our database");
} else {
console.log("We have no register of the username "+userId);
}
});
What about authentication and security?
You are in luck! Firebase released their Security API about two weeks ago! I have yet to explore it, but I'm sure it fills most of the gaps that allowed random people to use your reference to their own purpose.
Did you REALLY used in a web application?
Eeehm... ok, no. I used it in a Chrome Extension! It's still in process but it's going to be a Real Time chat inside a Chrome Extension. Ain't that cool? Fine. I find it cool. Anyway, you can browse more awesome examples for Firebase in their examples page.
What's the magic of these services? If you read your Dependency Injection and Mock Object Testing, at some point you can completely replace all of those services for your own through a REST Web Service provider.
Since these services were created to be used inside any application, they are CORS ready. As stated before, I have successfully used both of them from multiple domains without any issue (I'm even trying to use Firebase in a Chrome Extension, and I'm sure I will succeed soon).
Both Parse and Firebase have Data Browser managers, which means that you can see the data you are manipulating through a simple web browser. As a final disclaimer, I have no relationship with any of those services other than the face that James Taplin (Firebase Co-founder) was amazing enough to lend me some Beta access to Firebase.

You actually CAN use SQS from the browser, even without CORS, as long as you only need the browser to send messages, not receive them. Warning: this is a kludge that would make my CS professors cry.
When you perform a GET request via javascript, the browser will always perform the request, however, you'll only get access to the response if it was from the same origin (protocol, host, port). This is your ticket to ride, since messages can be posted to an SQS queue with just a GET, and who really cares about the response anyways?
Assuming you're using jquery, your queue is https://sqs.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/71717171/myqueue, and allows anyone to post a message, the following will post a message with the body "HITHERE" to the queue:
$.ajax({
url: 'https://sqs.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/71717171/myqueue' +
'?Action=SendMessage' +
'&Version=2012-11-05' +
'&MessageBody=HITHERE'
})
The'll be an error in the console saying that the request failed, but the message will show up in the queue anyways.

Have you considered JSONP? That is one way of calling cross-domain scripts from javascript without running into the same origin policy. You're going to have to set up some script somewhere to send you the data, though. Javascript just isn't up to the task.

Depending in what kind of data you want to send, and what you're going to do with it, one way of solving it would be to post the data to a Google Spreadsheet using Ajax. It's a bit tricky to accomplish though.Here is another stackoverflow question about it.
If presentation isn't that important you can just have an embedded Google Spreadsheet Form.

What about mailto:youremail#goeshere.com ? ihihi
Meantime, you can turn on some free hostings like Altervista or Heroku or somenthing else like them .. so you can connect to their server , if i remember these free services allows servers p2p, so you can create a sort of personal web services and push ajax requests as well, obviously their servers are slow for free accounts, but i think it's enought if you do not have so much users traffic, else you should turn on some better VPS or Hosting or Cloud solution.

Maybe CouchDB can provide what you're after. IrisCouch provides free CouchDB instances. Lock it down so that users can't view documents and have a sensible validation function and you've got yourself an easy RESTful place to stick your data in.