I have a table printed via ng-repeat, and my goal is to make every single td in tbody square. All the tds are equal in width, so I only need to check the first one to make changes. However, the page is dynamic so the width of table and therefore the td will change on window resize.
I have stylesheet in head.
<style type="text/css">.squerify>tr{height:60px;}</style>
This is used to change the height via:
document.styleSheets[1].cssRules[0].style.height=document.querySelector('.squerify td').offsetWidht+"px";
This works on its own, but I wonder how to get angular to tell me, that the td has changed its width (here I was thinking about the 'onresize' on window event).
Well, onresize might work now, but how about the initialization?
I have not found a way to let angular to tell me that it finished all its work.
PS.: The table is in view, if that changes anything...
The questions are as follow:
Is there a better way to check for the page resize in angular?
What to use for the initialization of table?
For everyone who would like to know how to do square elements:
We need a base element (div will do it) give it class (I will use square), this one will be square:
<div class="square"></div>
We put an img tag inside: (the "data:..." is needed, don't remove it, it is 1x1px transparent img)
We need a bit of css:
.square img{
width: 100%;
height: auto;
border: 0;
}
.square *:not(img){
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
}
That is it, easy right?
Related
I am trying to cycle through two sets of images using some Javascript. In order for each image to replace the old one as it cycles, I need to use css and set the position to absolute.
I'd like to align the image sets in a html table. If I don't specify positions within the css, the two image sets are on top of each other. If I do, they ignore the table, which I think is caused by the absolute positioning.
Rather than display a lot of code here, I will share a JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/n342aadc/3/
Add:
td {
position: relative;
width: 50px;
}
.container img.
.container1 img {
position: absolute;
}
fiddle
I think you need to specify a width for td otherwise it seems to collapse.
I have a round < button > with a < div > inside that represents a Unicode image. Currently the button is set to border-radius: 12px; height: 24px; and width: 24px; and the < div > is to font-size: 17px. The < div > Unicode image sits inside but not centered and the button is slightly off to the side.
How can I get the < div > to center inside an oval button despite what font-size the < div > is?
EDIT
I want to create a circle/round button with an emoji center to the middle of the button despite the button's size or the emoji image's size.
CSS for the button and emoji image for div:
#emoji-button {
border-radius: 19px;
width: 38px;
height: 38px;
}
#thumb-emoji:after {
content: "\01F44C";
font-size: 20px;
}
And round/circle button with emoji image inside:
<button
type="submit"
id="emoji-button"
>
<div id="thumb-emoji"></div>
</button>
But it is not centered.
And is there a way to just back the emoji image alone to be clickable for a method?
First off:
A <div> is a block element by nature. It will always become 100% wide. If you want it to not be 100% wide, give it a display:inline-block so it won't get bigger than it needs to be. Then give it a margin:0 auto; or a text-align:center on the parent to center it.
HOWEVER, You are not allowed to put <div>s inside of <buttons>. it is invalid HTML
See this answer for more information:
Why can't a <button> element contain a <div>?
Or, you could read here, from W3 that only phrasing content is expected to be used within a button:
https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-html5-20120329/the-button-element.html#the-button-element
If you do not know what phrasing content is, See this page:
https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-html5-20120329/content-models.html#phrasing-content
-- if you are looking into styling buttons specifically, maybe this very short tutorial would help:
http://web.archive.org/web/20110721191046/http://particletree.com/features/rediscovering-the-button-element/
Here is a fiddle of a working button like yours:
https://jsfiddle.net/68w6m7rr/
I honestly didn't have many problems with this. I only replaced your <div> with a span, that's it.
can you post your code?
You should NOT need a div inside the button. If you need the button to have a specific style give it a class. You could do something like this
CSS:
button.something {
padding: 25px;
border-radius: 100%;
font-size: 20px;
border: none;
}
HTML:
<button class="something">👌</button>
For clean and valid code, you'd better use a :before or :after pseudo-element. This would also take care of the centering by default.
It's even easy to set the content. Either in css only, like this:
1.
button:before {content:"\25b6";}
(put your unicode value there and classes/ids as needed, then specify them in turn in css)
2.
Or if you need to specify the value in mark-up, drop a custom data-* attribute like this:
<button data-myunicode="\25b6"></button>
with each button taking it's own value, then drop this single line in css:
button:before {content:attr(data-myunicode);}
Before answering, let's clear some things out.
div is a block level element, used in an inline element, which is the button element. Browsers will consider this invalid and will fix it by removing the block element from the inline element. For more about CSS concepts like box model, box generation please refer to these resources:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/HTML/Block-level_elements#Block-level_vs._inline
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Guide/CSS/Visual_formatting_model
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/CSS_Box_Model/Introduction_to_the_CSS_box_model
Also, if you are using an IDE, make sure you have installed linting/hinting tools to help you out. These tools can help you in code authoring so, make sure you have them. If you are using software like VSCode or Sublime Editor, there are many free code analysis tools out there.
Let's go back to the code now.
You said
I want to create a circle/round button with an emoji center to the
middle of the button despite the button's size or the emoji image's
size.
I went ahead and created a plunk here where I demonstrate this. Essentially, I wrapped the button around a div which serves as a container and through some CSS magic, I made it to have the same height as its width. More on that you can find at this SO answer.
The #emoji-button then has a border-radius: 100% in order to be round, width is inherited from the parent, meaning it has the same as the container and it position is absolute in order to fit in the container.
The #thumb-emoji has changed to a span element. By user agent styles it has text-align:center.
<div class="button-group">
<button type="submit" id="emoji-button">
<span id="thumb-emoji"></span>
</button>
</div>
CSS:
.button-group {
position: relative;
width: 100px;
}
.button-group:before {
content: "";
display: block;
padding-top: 100%;
}
#emoji-button {
width: inherit;
border-radius: 100%;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
}
#thumb-emoji:after {
content: "\01F44C";
font-size: 200%;
}
You can change the .button-group width to whatever width you want, it will still keep its 1:1 ratio.
You can use then media queries on .button-group to adjust the font-size of your #thumb-emoji, by setting your desired breakpoints.
I've got HTML+CSS code. I need 1st div (row-1, white colored) to take first half of the container height, and 2nd div (row-2, orange-colored) to take the second part.
Here is my html:
http://pastebin.com/ipiEKHBZ
and my css:
http://pastebin.com/jtxw695F
Revised answer: After realising the default approach did not work with your HTML, this should work. You have classes .content-row-1 and 2 respectively. You can use those to tell the corresponding rows to always use a certain portion of the height. For this to work you also need to manually fix the positioning. (Someone correct me if this can be done more elegantly) For example those classes could look something like:
.content-row-1 {
background: #eee;
position: absolute;
top: 10%;
display: block;
height: 40%;
width: 100%;
}
I noticed that your footer already takes 10% of the height and and assumed you did not want any overlap or gaps. For that to work you should also give your header a percentage for height (10% in my example to keep things simple).
And for the future: try using https://jsfiddle.net/ when showing your code samples. I put it together at https://jsfiddle.net/kvbyk3f1/.
This is an issue on Firefox and IE so far that I've tested; the problem does not exist on Chrome.
I'm including two TinyMCE editors on a page with one partially off-screen to start. When I select the color picker dropdown option from the toolbar on the first TinyMCE instance, the dropdown appears where it should. But if I scroll down and select the color picker dropdown in the second instance, that dropdown appears way below the editor and typically off the page.
You can see this in action here: http://jsfiddle.net/nm6wtca3/
Without removing the html, body CSS, what can I do to have the color picker always appear in the correct position?
I've traced the problem down to setting CSS on the html, body elements.
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
overflow-x: hidden;
}
The dropdown div has CSS applied to it that is auto-calculated by TinyMCE. It looks something like this:
z-index: 65535;
left: 641.467px;
top: 633px;
width: 162px;
height: 105px;
How it appears in FF (sometimes way worse):
How it appears in Chrome (how it should look):
You did say you don't want to remove any CSS from the html,body, but you didn't say anything about adding to it! This solution is based on the assumption that you can add to the html,body
Solution
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
overflow-x: hidden;
position: relative; /* Line added */
}
JSFiddle Example
I hope this helps. In all reality, you really only need to apply position: relative; to the body like so body { position: relative; }
I'm not super familiar with tinymce's colorpicker, but I can see the issue, and I can replicate it reliably: your problem occurs when you have a picker open, and then you scroll. I can replicate this in chrome too. Here's a video.
When I look at the DOM, I see that tinyMCE has created two absolute-positioned divs at the end of document.body, one for each picker. When you open one, their position is updated to reflect the location of the toolbar-button at the time you clicked it, but it never gets updated when you scroll!
So, how to solve this? Well, there are a few possibilities:
Option 1: it looks like tinyMCE provides a method to bind a control to an event (here). With this, you could bind a callback to 'scroll' that repositions the box...
Huh, now that I think of it, you could simply close any open colorpickers whenever a user scrolls ... kinda feels like a cop-out but there's no denying it has the best R.O.I. ;) We'll call that Option 2!
Option 3: depending on the implementation of the colorpicker, you may be able to override where in the DOM those divs get rendered. The API method I saw that looked the most promising is here. Once you have the div inside a relative-positioned parent, you'd also have to make the colorpicker's positioning algorithm smart enough to look in the right place for x and y offset ...when I tried this by just moving the element and mashing in some css by hand in chrome-console, the algorithm still computed x and y offsets based on doc.body, so depending on where you were scrolled at click-time, everything would be out of position
It looks like this issue might be troubling other people as well... maybe they've found a solution but haven't posted anything about it?
I hope this is enough info to get you past the problem... Let me know if you have any questions!
It looks like the problem is caused by overflow-x: hidden;
It may not be the answer you want but removing that or moving it to a page wrapper will solve your problem.
Working Example
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
padding:0;
margin:0;
}
#pagewrapper{
overflow-x: hidden;
}
Another option would be to force repositioning on scroll, but honestly this is overkill... I strongly recommend fixing the css instead.
Another working example
$('body').scroll(posfix); // when the body scrolls
$('#mceu_10').click(posfix); // when you click the top font color button
$('#mceu_35').click(posfix); // when you click the bottom font color button
function posfix() {
setTimeout(function () { // hack way to ensure it fires after the menu is shown
$('#mceu_51').css({
top: $('#mceu_10').offset().top + $('#mceu_10').height(), // set top/left based on button's position
left: $('#mceu_10').offset().left + $('#mceu_10').width() / 2
});
$('#mceu_52').css({
top: $('#mceu_35').offset().top + $('#mceu_35').height(),
left: $('#mceu_35').offset().left + $('#mceu_35').width() / 2
});
}, 1);
}
it works on firefox, and Internet Explorer fine
just remove this css code
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
overflow-x: hidden;
}
Please take a look at this:
html,
body {
width: auto;
height: auto;
overflow-x: hidden;
}
You can simply set body width and height to auto, then there won't be any need to use position and you don't have to remove anything. I think you do not need to use height: 100% since it will be auto-calculated by TinyMCE. i hope it helped.
Update
Look at the screen shot from chrome and its same in firefox. And i didn't remove any css but just changed..and by putting 100% in css the output will be like :-
Please check this one with auto but not 100%..thank you
Here's a link to what I'll be referring to.
I'm having some trouble getting the background image to work the way I'd like it to.
I want the background to auto resize based on the width of the window, which it is already doing correctly. If you make your window smaller you'll see the background shrink with it.
Here's the issue. If you make your window wide (short) then the background will resize and go too high so you can't see the top of the background anymore (since the background is bottom positioned).
I want the background to be top position when you are at the top of the page, and as you scroll down it will slowly move to be bottom positioned. Sort of like the effect of an Android phone's background when you move left and right. Of course, keep in mind that I still want the background to auto-resize when you make the window smaller.
html {
background-color: #70d4e3;
height: 100%;
}
body {
height: 100%;
}
.background {
margin-top: 45px;
width: 100%;
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
z-index: -9999;
}
.banner {
margin: 0px auto;
width: 991px;
margin-bottom: -9px;
}
.content {
background: url("http://i.imgur.com/daRJl.png") no-repeat scroll center center transparent;
height: 889px;
margin: 0 auto;
width: 869px;
}
.innerContent {
padding: 30px;
}
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/6d5Cm.jpg" alt="" class="background" />
<div class="banner">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/JptsZ.jpg" alt="" />
</div>
<div class="content">
<div class="innerContent">
testing
</div>
</div>
Maybe some javascript or jquery would be needed to achieve this.
Well, this was fun, thanks!
I hope you don't mind me taking the liberty to use percentages to make my life a little bit easier and possibly the script slightly more robust since I can reliably use floats with percentages.
What I did is make the layout, html and css comply with the rules you need for the bg to be animated properly, they stayed largely the same from what you had.
Then it was just a question of figuring out the calculations needed with the right properties to figure out the percentage you were from the top, the *20 is actually the amount of space 'left' to fill by the background image in percentages (as the background height is 80%).
They I moved the calculations to a function so I could call that on scroll and on window resize, making sure it's initiated on any event that modifies the window somehow...
Didn't do extensive testing but it worked in Chrome and I'm tired :p
I believe this is what you are looking for:
http://jsfiddle.net/sg3s/RSqrw/15/ See edit 2
If you wanted this the other way arround just make the page background start at the top and modify that:
http://jsfiddle.net/sg3s/RSqrw/14/ See edit 2
Edit:
As a bonus, and since I had never actually written jquery script as a 'plugin', I decided to convert this into one. What I came up with should be easy to implement and use!
http://jsfiddle.net/sg3s/RSqrw/52/ See Edit 3
Functionality successfully tested in Chrome, Firefox 3.6, IE9 + compatibility mode
Edit 2:
Reading the question again checking if I did it right I noticed I didn't quite do what you want, so I updated the link in the first edit which gives you a plugin in which you can have several options for the scrolling background. It retains my 'old' interpetation while also doing what you want... Read comments in code for some extra descriptions.
Edit 3:
As I went to work today I was bothered with the fact that my plugin 'try' was a little bloated. And as you mentioned in the comment it didn't quite fit the requirements.
So I rewrote it to only do what you want and not much more, tested in Chrome Firefox, IE9 +compat etc etc.. This script is a lot cleaner.
http://jsfiddle.net/sg3s/vZxHW/
You can chose to make the background stick to the top or bottom if the height fits in the window. Nothing else, but that is already more than enough to do some pretty cool stuff :p
An exact solution: Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/srGHE/2/show/
View source
Thanks for the challenge. See below for the solution, which is complying with all requirements, including recommended yet optional (with steps on how to remove these) features. I only show the changed parts of your page, with an explanation after each section (CSS, HTML and JavaScript):
CSS (changes):
html,body{
margin: 0;
height: 100%;
padding: 0;
}
body{
background-color: #70d4e3;
}
#background { /*Previously: .background*/
/*Removed: margin-top: 45px;
No other changes*/
}
#banner /*Previously: .banner; no other changes */
#content /*Previously: .content; no other changes */
#innerContent /*Previously: .innerContent; no other changes */
Explanation of CSS revisions:
margin-top:45px at the background is unnecessary, since you're absolutely positioning the element.
All of the elements which are unlikely to appear more than once should be selected via the id (#) selector. This selector is more specific than the class selector.
HTML (changes):
All of the class attributes have been replaced by id. No other changes have been made. Don't forget to include the JQuery framework, because I've implemented your wishes using JQuery.
JavaScript (new):
Note: I have added a feature which you didn't request, but seems logical. The code will automatically reserve sufficient margin at the left side of the window in order to always display the background. Remove anything between the marked comments if you don't want this feature.
$(document).ready(function(){
//"Static" variables
var background = $("#background");
var marginTop = parseFloat(background.css("margin-top")) || 0;
var bannerWidth = $("#banner").width(); /*Part of auto left-margin */
var extraContWidth = (bannerWidth - $("#content").width())/2; /*Same as above*/
function fixBG(){
var bodyWidth = $("body").width();
var body_bg_width_ratio = bodyWidth/1920;
var bgHeight = body_bg_width_ratio * 926; //Calcs the visible height of BG
var height = $(document).height();
var docHeight = $(window).height();
var difHeight = bgHeight - docHeight;
var scrollDif = $(document).scrollTop() / (height - docHeight) || 0;
/*Start of automatic left-margin*/
var arrowWidth = body_bg_width_ratio * 115; //Arrow width
if(bodyWidth - bannerWidth > arrowWidth*2){
$("body > div").css("margin-left", "auto");
} else {
$("body > #banner").css("margin-left", arrowWidth+"px");
$("body > #content").css("margin-left", (arrowWidth+extraContWidth)+"px");
}
/*End of automatic left-margin*/
if(difHeight > 0){
background.css({top:(-scrollDif*difHeight-marginTop)+"px", bottom:""});
} else {
background.css({top:"", bottom:"0"});
}
}
$(window).resize(fixBG);
$(window).scroll(fixBG);
fixBG();
});
Explanation of the JavaScript code
The size of the background is determined by calculating the ratio of the background and document width. The width property is used, because it's the most reliable method for the calculation.
Then, the height of the viewport, document body and background is calculated. If applicable, the scrolling offset is also calculated, to prepare the movement of the background, if necessary.
Optionally, the code determines whether it's necessary to adjust the left margin (to keep the background visible at a narrow window).
Finally, if the background arrow has a greater height than the document's body, the background is moved accordingly, taking the scrolling position into account. The arrow starts at the top of the document, and will move up as the user scrolls (so that the bottom side of the arrow will be the bottom of the page when the user has fully scrolled down). If it's unnecessary to move the background, because it already suits well, the background will be positioned at the bottom of the page.
When the page has finished loading, this functionality is added to the Resize and scroll events, so that the background is always at the right location.
If you've got any other questions, feel free to ask them.
well, I'm not sure if I understand you and why do you want to do that, but you can try adding 2 backgrounds (see http://www.css3.info/preview/multiple-backgrounds/ ), one with the top bg and another with the bottom bg but I think that if the page is not too long it will cause issues, so the other answer with pure CSS is as follows: first add 3 horizontal divs with 100% width. Top div will have your top bg and its height, middle div will be transparent and auto height and bottom div will have your bottom bg and its height. All divs will have a 0 z-index. Then create a higher z-index div to act as a container and you'll be set. If I understand your question right, that's the close I can think of to achieve that. This being said, I'm pretty sure you can do this with JQuery with way better results
Using jQuery I was able to give you what I think you're asking for:
$(window).scroll(function() {
var h = Math.max($(document).height(), $(window).height());
var bottom = h - $(".background").height() - $(window).height();
$(".background").css("top", (($(window).scrollTop() / h) * bottom) + "px");
});
EDIT: Forgot to account for the way scrollTop reports position.
Or maybe:
.background {
margin-top: 45px;
max-width: 100%;
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
z-index: -9999;
max-height: 100%;
}
I reccomend using jQuery Background Parallax
http://www.stevefenton.co.uk/Content/Jquery-Background-Parallax/
The function is as simple as
$("body").backgroundparallax();
Ask if you don't get it to work.
#abney; as i understand your question may that's you want http://jsfiddle.net/sandeep/RSqrw/60/
you need only css for this:
#background {
position: fixed;
width: 100%;
height:100%;
top: 0;
left:0;
z-index: -1;
}
The solution to your issue is a nice little lightweight plugin by Scott Robin. You can get more info, download it, and make your life easier for all of your projects by visiting his project page here.