Develop Reference

Regex finding the last string that doesnt contain a number

Usually in my system i have the following string:
http://localhost/api/module
to find out the last part of the string (which is my route) ive been using the following:
/[^\/]+$/g
However there may be cases where my string looks abit different such as:
http://localhost/api/module/123
Using the above regex it would then return 123. When my String looks like this i know that the last part will always be a number. So my question is how do i make sure that i can always find the last string that does not contain a number?

This is what i came up with which really stricty matches only module for the following lines:
http://localhost/api/module
http://localhost/api/module/123
http://localhost/api/module/123a
http://localhost/api/module/a123
http://localhost/api/module/a123a
http://localhost/api/module/1a3
(?!\w*\d\w*)[^\/][a-zA-Z]+(?=\/\w*\d+\w*|$)
Explanation
I basically just extended your expression with negative lookahead and lookbehind which basically matches your expression given both of the following conditions is true:
(?!\w*\d\w*) May contain letters, but no digits
[a-zA-Z]+ Really, truly only consists of one or more letters (was needed)
(?=\/\d+|$)The match is either followed by a slash, followed by digits or the end of the line
See this in action in my sample at Regex101.

partYouWant = urlString.replace(/^.*\/([a-zA-Z]+)[\/0-9]*$/,'$1')
Here it is in action:
urlString="http://localhost/api/module/123"
urlString.replace(/^.*\/([a-zA-Z]+)[\/0-9]*$/,'$1')
-->"module"
urlString="http://localhost/api/module"
urlString.replace(/^.*\/([a-zA-Z]+)[\/0-9]*$/,'$1')
-->"module"
It just uses a capture expression to find the last non-numeric part.
It's going to do this too, not sure if this is what you want:
urlString="http://localhost/api/module/123/456"
urlString.replace(/^.*\/([a-zA-Z]+)[\/0-9]*$/,'$1')
-->"module"

/([0-9])\w+/g
That would select the numbers. You could use it remove that part from the url. What language are you using it for ?

Javascript Regex Conditional

I have strings like this:
#WTK-56491650H #=> want to capture '56491650H'
#M123456 #=> want to capture 'M123456'
I want to match everything after the # unless there is a dash then I want everything after the dash. I have a feeling I'm close but maybe not. I've found a lot of stuff about javascript regex conditionals and I can never get it to do the if then else part. It only matches after the # and that's it.
This is what I have so far:
/((?=-{1})-(.+)|(?!-{0)#(.+))/
And the demo: https://regex101.com/r/bY0yC6/1

You can use this regex with an optional match to consume everything between # and -:
/#(?:[^-]*-)?([^#-]+)$/mg
Updated RegEx Demo

Here's a solution which uses non-capturing groups (?:stuff) which I prefer so I don't have to dig through the result groups to find the string I'm interested in.
(?:#)(?:[\w\d]+-)?([\w\d]+)
First it throws out the # character, then throws out the stuff up to and including the - character, if it is there, then groups the rest as your match.

With a single regular expression, your full match will always contain the hash and/or dash because you are using it to define an acceptable string, but the groupings of a match can provide you the information that you're looking for.
you want the string to start with a hash so your regex should contain the #
next, you don't want anything before and including a dash (.*-)?, and we add a question mark because this is an optional part (ie if there is no dash)
finally, we can grab everything that is left into a final group, which will be your answer (.*)
the full expression is then #(.*-)?(.*) as pointed out by Lux

Unable to find a string matching a regex pattern

While trying to submit a form a javascript regex validation always proves to be false for a string.
Regex:- ^(([a-zA-Z]:)|(\\\\{2}\\w+)\\$?)(\\\\(\\w[\\w].*))+(.jpeg|.JPEG|.jpg|.JPG)$
I have tried following strings against it
abc.jpg,
abc:.jpg,
a:.jpg,
a:asdas.jpg,
What string could possible match this regex ?

This regex won't match against anything because of that $? in the middle of the string.
Apparently using the optional modifier ? on the end string symbol $ is not correct (if you paste it on https://regex101.com/ it will give you an error indeed). If the javascript parser ignores the error and keeps the regex as it is this still means you are going to match an end string in the middle of a string which is supposed to continue.
Unescaped it was supposed to match a \$ (dollar symbol) but as it is written it won't work.
If you want your string to be accepted at any cost you can probably use Firebug or a similar developer tool and edit the string inside the javascript code (this, assuming there's no server side check too and assuming it's not wrong aswell). If you ignore the $? then a matching string will be \\\\w\\\\ww.jpg (but since the . is unescaped even \\\\w\\\\ww%jpg is a match)
Of course, I wrote this answer assuming the escaping is indeed the one you showed in the question. If you need to find a matching pattern for the correctly escaped one ^(([a-zA-Z]:)|(\\{2}\w+)\$?)(\\(\w[\w].*))+(\.jpeg|\.JPEG|\.jpg|\.JPG)$ then you can use this tool to find one http://fent.github.io/randexp.js/ (though it will find weird matches). A matching pattern is c:\zz.jpg

If you are just looking for a regular expression to match what you got there, go ahead and test this out:
(\w+:?\w*\.[jpe?gJPE?G]+,)
That should match exactly what you are looking for. Remove the optional comma at the end if you feel like it, of course.

If you remove escape level, the actual regex is
^(([a-zA-Z]:)|(\\{2}\w+)\$?)(\\(\w[\w].*))+(.jpeg|.JPEG|.jpg|.JPG)$
After ^start the first pipe (([a-zA-Z]:)|(\\{2}\w+)\$?) which matches an alpha followed by a colon or two backslashes followed by one or more word characters, followed by an optional literal $. There is some needless parenthesis used inside.
The second part (\\(\w[\w].*))+ matches a backslash, followed by two word characters \w[\w] which looks weird because it's equivalent to \w\w (don't need a character class for second \w). Followed by any amount of any character. This whole thing one or more times.
In the last part (.jpeg|.JPEG|.jpg|.JPG) one probably forgot to escape the dot for matching a literal. \. should be used. This part can be reduced to \.(JPE?G|jpe?g).
It would match something like
A:\12anything.JPEG
\\1$\anything.jpg
Play with it at regex101. A better readable could be
^([a-zA-Z]:|\\{2}\w+\$?)(\\\w{2}.*)+\.(jpe?g|JPE?G)$
Also read the explanation on regex101 to understand any pattern, it's helpful!

Regexp: excluding a word but including non-standard punctuation

I want to find strings that contain words in a particular order, allowing non-standard characters in between the words but excluding a particular word or symbol.
I'm using javascript's replace function to find all instances and put into an array.
So, I want select...from, with anything except 'from' in between the words. Or I can separate select...from from select...from (, as long as I exclude nesting. I think the answer is the same for both, i.e. how do I write: find x and not y within the same regexp?
From the internet, I feel this should work: /\bselect\b^(?!from).*\bfrom\b/gi but this finds no matches.
This works to find all select...from: /\bselect\b[0-9a-zA-Z#\(\)\[\]\s\.\*,%_+-]*?\bfrom\b/gi but modifying it to exclude the parenthesis "(" at the end prevents any matches: /\bselect\b[0-9a-zA-Z#\(\)\[\]\s\.\*,%_+-]*?\bfrom\b\s*^\(/gi
Can anyone tell me how to exclude words and symbols within this regexp?
Many thanks
Emma
Edit: partial string input:
left outer join [stage].[db].[table14] o on p.Project_id = o.project_id
left outer join
(
select
different_id
,sum(costs) - ( sum(brushes) + sum(carpets) + sum(fabric) + sum(other) + sum(chairs)+ sum(apples) ) as overallNumber
from
(
select ace from [stage].db.[table18] J
Javascript:
sequel = stringInputAsAbove;
var tst = sequel.replace(/\bselect\b[\s\S]*?\bfrom\b/gi, function(a,b) { console.log('match: '+a); selects.push(b); return a; });
console.log(selects);
Console.log(selects) should print an array of numbers, where each number is the starting character of a select...from. This works for the second regexp I gave in my info, printing: [95, 251]. Your \s\S variation does the same, #stribizhev.
The first example ^(?!from).* should do likewise but returns [].
The third example \s*^\( should return 251 only but returns []. However I have just noticed that the positive expression \s*\( does give 95, so some progress! It's the negatives I'm getting wrong.

Your \bselect\b^(?!from).*\bfrom\b regex doesn't work as expected because:
^ means here beginning of a line, not negation of next part, so
the \bselect\b^ means, select word followed by beginning of a
line. After removal of ^ regex start to match something
(DEMO) but it is still invalid.
in multiline text .* without modification will not match new line,
so regex will match only select...from in single lines, but if you
change it for (.|\n)* (as a simple example) it will match
multiline, but still invalid
the * is greede quantifire, so it will match as much a possible,
but if you use reluctant quantifire *?, regex will match to first
occurance of from word, and int will start to return relativly
correct result.
\bselect\b(?!from) means match separate select word which is not
directly followed by separate from word, so it would be
selectfrom somehow composed of separate words (because
select\bfrom) so (?!from) doesn't work and it is redundant
In effect you will get regex very similar to what Stribizhev gave you: \bselect\b(.|\n)*?\bfrom\b
In third expression you meke same mistake: \bselect\b[0-9a-zA-Z#\(\)\[\]\s\.\*,%_+-]*?\bfrom\b\s*^\( using ^ as (I assume) a negation, not beginning of a line. Remove ^ and you will again get relativly valid result (match from select through from to closing parathesis ) ).
Your second regex works similar to \bselect\b(.|\n)*?\bfrom\b or \bselect\b[\s\S]*?\bfrom\b.
I wrote "relativly valid result", as I also think, that parsing SQL with regex could be very camplicated, so I am not sure if it will work in every case.
You can also try to use positive lookahead to match just position in text, like:
(?=\bselect\b(?:.|\n)*?\bfrom\b)
DEMO - the () was added to regex just to return beginning index of match in groups, so it would be easier to check it validity
Negation in regex
We use ^ as negation in character class, for example [^a-z] means match anything but not letter, so it will match number, symbol, whitespace, etc, but not letter from range a to z (Look here). But this negation is on a level of single character. I you use [^from] it will prevent regex from matching characters f,r,o and m (demo). Also the [^from]{4} will avoid matching from but also form, morf, etc.
To exlude the whole word from matching by regex, you need to use negative look ahead, like (?!from), which will fail to match, if there will be chosen word from fallowing given position. To avoid matching whole line containing from you could use ^(?!.*from.*).+$ (demo).
However in your case, you don't need to use this construction, because if you replace greedy quantifire .*\bfrom with .*?\bfrom it will match to first occurance of this word. Whats more it would couse problems. Take a look on this regex, it will not match anything because (?![\s\S]*from[\s\S]*) is not restricted by anything, so it will match only if there is no from after select, but we want to match also from! in effect this regex try to match and exclude from at once, and fail. so the (?!.*word.*) construction works much better to exclude matching line with given word.
So what to do if we don't what to match a word in a fragment of a match? I think select\b([^f]|f(?!rom))*?\bfrom\b is a good solution. With ([^f]|f(?!rom))*? it will match everything between select and from, but will not exclude from.
But if you would like to match only select...from not followed by ( then it is good idea to use (?!\() like. But in your regex (multiline, use of (.|\n)*? or [\s\S]*? it will cause to match up to next select...from part, because reluctant quantifire will chenge a plece where it need to match to make whole regex . In my opinion, good solution would be to use again:
select\b([^f]|f(?!rom))*?\bfrom\b(?!\s*?\()
which will not overlap additional select..from and will not match if there is \( after select...from - check it here

Javascript regex: how to not capture an optional string on the right side

For example /(www\.)?(.+)(\.com)?/.exec("www.something.com") will result with 'something.com' at index 1 of the resulting array. But what if we want to capture only 'something' in a capturing group?
Clarifications:
The above string is just for example - we dont want to assume anything about the suffix string (.com above). It could as well be orange.
Just this part can be solved in C# by matching from right to left (I dont know of a way of doing that in JS though) but that will end up having www. included then!
Sure, this problem as such is easily solvable mixing regex with other string methods like replace / substring. But is there a solution with only regex?

(?:www\.)?(.+?)(?:\.com|$)
This will give only something ingroups.Just make other groups non capturing.See demo.
https://regex101.com/r/rO0yD8/4

Just removing the last character (?) from the regex does the trick:
https://regex101.com/r/uR0iD2/1
The last ? allows a valid output without the (\.com) matching anything, so the (.+) can match all the characters after the www..
Another option is to replace the greedy quantifier +, which always tries to match as much characters as possible, with the +?, which tries to match as less characters as possible:
(www\.)?(.+?)(\.com)?$
https://regex101.com/r/oY7fE0/2
Note that it is necessary to force a match with the entire string through the end of line anchor ($).

If you only want to capture "something", use non-capturing groups for the other sections:
/(?:www\.)?(.+)(?:\.com)?/.exec("www.something.com")
The ?: denotes the groups as non-capturing.