is there any way to get semantic javascript code completion in VIM?
I've tried YouCompleteMe (YCM) and it gives me some code completion, however it is purely based upon my current buffer (or buffers?).
When I explicitly call :YcmCompleter, I get
ValueError: No semantic completer exists for filetypes: ['javascript']
I'm mostly working in node:sails.js and angularjs. I'd really appreciate a way of getting library methods suggested while typing (e.g. for angular, protractor / mocha / jasmine).
Thanks!
From YCm's huge README:
YCM will use your omnifunc (see :h omnifunc in Vim) as a source for semantic completions if it does not have a native semantic completion engine for your file's filetype. Vim comes with okayish omnifuncs for various languages like Ruby, PHP etc. It depends on the language.
Tern for Vim provides the kind of completion you are looking for via Vim's native omni-completion (<C-x><C-o>). With that plugin installed, YCM should be able to use it transparently for JavaScript completion.
These answers being very outdated, and since I've struggle a little bit with it, here is an update:
Javascript semantic support in Vim with YouCompleteMe is now supported via TSServer engine as explained in Ycm's HUGE readme
I've got the information thanks to : https://medium.com/parallel-thinking/actually-great-vim-javascript-completion-eaefa1cb443d
At the moment there is no semantic completer for javascript available in YouCompleteMe. However, people are working on that. Here is the pending pull request for integrating JS Tern.
Without semantic completer available you are indeed limited to language agnostic completers, such as the identifier completer, filepath completer and snippet completer.
UPDATE: Tern has been integrated into YCM
Related
Github repo says:
Implementation of Mozilla's Parser API in JavaScript. There are few examples on github and mozilla's reference link. I have seen this library being used in one of Angular 2 seed project as well.
But what is the use of this library? Can someone explain in easy words to elaborate purpose/advantage of this library.
Thanks
It is literally just a javascript shell, much like node you can use it to write JS interactively in the shell or run JS files with it.
SpiderMonkey is Mozilla's JavaScript engine written in C/C++.
Parser, is a JS API version of that, you can use it to write tools that manipulate JS files, like a linter or compiler.
Reflect is a super old version of that which, as far as I know, is not a viable option given the other tools we have today. Note that the repo was last updated in 2012, and the JS is only ES3 compliant.
I am new to creating plugins. I want to create an eclipse plugin for a new scripting language. And, its syntax is quite similar to JavaScript. So, I wish to extend existing Javascript plugin that exists in eclipse.
Please suggest how do I go about it. Mainly, I want to have editor functionality (syntax checking, auto completion and ctrl-click to go to hop across functions), no compiler/build is needed.
Also, where do I find the source code for existing JavaScript plugin.
The source of the JavaScript editor can be found in the http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/repository/kepler/ repository (assuming Eclipse Kepler). Look for the JavaScript Development Tools SDK.
You install this in to Eclipse using Help > Install New Software and the source is then available to read using Navigate > Open Type (you need to have Include all plug-ins from target in Java search selected in Preferences > Plug-in Development for this).
Eclipse editor code is very complex and it likely to be hard work to adapt it. You might find it easier to use something like Eclipse xText which is designed for developing support for new languages.
I have a JavaScript library that I am working on currently. I have structured it into lots of files and I use the module approach to define each 'module'.
var ns = generateNamespace("me.mycompany.mypackage.MyFile");
(function (ns, undefined) {
// some module
}(ns));
The modules are dynamically named using a namespacing function meaning that autocomplete is almost impossible as things stand (unless Eclipse can run my code and figure out the namespaces, Visual Studio can!).
Therefore I intend to generate JSdoc for my project in the hope that if I include this into Eclipse (somehow) Eclipse can use this to give me content assist.
Firstly I do not know if this is possible... however I think that it is as I can see that it is maybe how this works? However I tried to follow this along and struggled to get something working, by this I mean it didn't work. The interesting info from the link:
"JSDT libraries are collections of JavaScript source files that have prototyped object/class definitions and JSDoc. The inference engine then models these libraries... making them available to every JavaScript file in the project... Bindings for nonstandard and future runtimes are similarly easy to create... add the... library to their project and gain content completion and hover help"
I know how to write JSdoc annotations and I know how to generate JSdoc using one of the various tools.
What I need therefore is instructions on how to include JSdoc (as a library maybe) in Eclipse so that it will give auto complete for the stuff in the JSdoc.
Previous answer:
You can also run jsdoc_toolkit from within eclipse by setting up Run -
> External Tools -> Open External Tools Dialog...
Location
C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.5.0_12\bin\java.exe
Working Directory
C:\DirectoryToWhereJsDocToolkitIsLocated\jsdoc_toolkit
Arguments
-jar app/js.jar app/run.js -r=4 -t=templates/htm "-d=C:
\PathToWhereDocIsSaved" "C:\PathToWebsiteToDocument"
For more about the arguments check the jsdoc_toolkit documentation.
Have fun
Simon
Taken from this Google Groups thread.
Updated Answer:
Eclipse JavaScript Editor: content assist for js files, autocompletion
Disclaimer, I'm the author of tern.java.
I suggest you that you install tern.java. It provides a JSDoc support. Once you have selected this support, you can benefit
with completion :
and soon with validation:
This support is not perfect but it starts working.
I am not using it by myself, so I'm not sure if it works, but there exists a grunt-plugin for jsdoc3. Grunt is supported by Eclipse. So maybe it helps.
Grunt-PlugIn in npm
So we're writing a full-text search framework MongoDb. MongoDB is pretty much javascript-native, so we wrote the javascript library first, and it works.
Now I'm trying to write a python framework for it, which will be partially in python, but partially use those same stored javascript functions - the javascript functions are an intrinsic part of the library. On the other hand, the javascript framework does not depend on python. since they are pretty intertwined it seems like it's worthwhile keeping them in the same repository.
I'm trying to work out a way of structuring the whole project to give the javascript and python frameworks equal status (maybe a ruby driver or whatever in the future?), but still allow the python library to install nicely.
Currently it looks like this: (simplified a little)
javascript/jstest/test1.js
javascript/mongo-fulltext/search.js
javascript/mongo-fulltext/util.js
python/docs/indext.rst
python/tests/search_test.py
python/tests/__init__.py
python/mongofulltextsearch/__init__.py
python/mongofulltextsearch/mongo_search.py
python/mongofulltextsearch/util.py
python/setup.py
I've skipped out a few files for simplicity, but you get the general idea; it' a pretty much standard python project... except that it depends critcally ona whole bunch of javascript which is stored in a sibling directory tree.
What's the preferred setup for dealing with this kind of thing when it comes to setuptools? I can work out how to use package_data etc to install data files that live inside my python project as per the setuptools docs.
The problem is if i want to use setuptools to install stuff, including the javascript files from outside the python code tree, and then also access them in a consistent way when I'm developing the python code and when it is easy_installed to someone's site.
Is that supported behaviour for setuptools? Should i be using paver or distutils2 or Distribute or something? (basic distutils is not an option; the whole reason I'm doing this is to enable requirements tracking) How should i be reading the contents of those files into python scripts?
The short answer is that none of the Python distribution tools is going to do what you want, the exact way you want it. Even if you use distutils' data_files feature, you're still going to have to have your javascript files copied into your Python project directory (i.e., somewhere under the same directory as your setup.py.)
Given that, you might as well just copy the .js files to your package (i.e. alongside mongofulltextsearch/init.py) as part of your build process, and use package_data or include_package_data=True.
(Or alternatively, you could possibly use symlinks, externals, or some such, if your revision control system supports those. I believe that when building source distributions, the Python distribution tools convert symlinks to real files. At least, you could give that a try.)
Given a need to write command line utilities to do common tasks like uploading files to a remote FTP site, downloading data from a remote MySQL database etc.
Is it practical to use JavaScript for this sort of thing? I know there are JavaScript interpreters that can be run from the command line, but are there libraries for things like FTP and database access the way there are for e.g. Java? If so, what's the best place to look for them? (Google searches with JavaScript in the keywords always seem to return many pages of browser specific things.)
And is there a way to package a JavaScript program up as a standalone executable on Windows?
Update: I've decided Python is a better tool for this kind of job, but the answers to the original question are still good ones.
Standalone executable?
By the way you ask the question, I'm not sure if you are aware, but the Windows Script Host - included in Windows - allows you to run .js files from the command-line. Your javascript will not be an executable, it will remain a script, a text file. The script runs within cscript.exe, which is provided by WSH. There's no compilation required. Maybe you knew all that.
I use Javascript this way for various utilities on Windows.
I think your instinct is right on the availability of libraries. You are sort of on your own to find all those things. Although, once you find them, it's not hard to package Javascript libraries as COM components and allow re-use from anywhere. See here for an example of packaging the Google Diff/Patch/Match Javascript library in COM.
Addendum: Once a bit of code is available within COM, it can be consumed by any Javascript running on the machine. Some examples of COM objects available to Javascript scripts running in WSH:
MSXML2.XMLHTTP object - used in AJAX, but can be used for any HTTP communication. There also an object for the XSLT engine so you can do transforms from script.
Excel.Application - allows you to open up Excel spreadsheets and automate them from Javascript.
Communicator.UIAutomation - automate MS Communicator (send IM's via script)
COM objects for Google Earth.
SlowAES - an all-Javascript implementation of AES encryption.
You can use Rhino to compile Javascript into Java byte code, and get access to all Java libraries.
Or you could use JScript.net, and get access to the .net libraries. .net includes a jsc.exe that produces exe-files.
Both of these requires the respective framework to be installed to be able to run.
Node.js is by far the best environment for running non-browser JS. I've used Rhino and SpiderMonkey, and there's a pretty huge difference in everything from the basics like how errors are handled to the size of the community using the tool. Node is pitched for "server-side" JS - building server apps in JS. It's great for this. But it works equally well for building command line tools.
The NPM package manager (bundled with Node) provides a nice global directory for finding and installing packages. It works much better than other language equivalents like PECL / Pear / CPAN / etc. Several high quality tools like JSHint, The Jade templating language, and the CoffeeScript compiler are all already available through NPM/Node:
npm install -g jshint, coffee-script, jade
jshint my_code.js
jade < my.jade > my.html
For args parsing, there are packages like commander.js. I currently use a heavily extended version of Commander in my underscore-cli command-line tool.
For messing with JSON or for doing command-line JS work (similar to "perl -pe"), check out underscore-cli - It's a really powerful tool for processing JSON data, processing underscore templates, and running JS expressions from the command-line. I use it for 1001 different things that would otherwise be really annoying to accomplish.
Rhino is bundled with JDK 1.6, jrunscript.exe in the bin directory will allow you to run any Javascript you want. Since it runs under Java you get access to any Java libraries that you may have.
We use it from the command line extensively. It's very good at that.
One way is to write these utilities as AIR applications - They can be written in JavaScript and need not have a UI. They have access to the command line, and there are existing ActionScript 3 libraries that can handle FTP etc. These ActionScript APIs can be called from JS, in AIR applications. AIR applications also have access to a sqlite database.
jslibs is a good standalone JavaScript runtime that support many 3rd party open source libraries like zlib, SQLite, NSPR, libiconv, libTomCrypt, OpenGL, ...