Javascript - How do I improve performance when animating integers? - javascript

On the site I'm working on, we collect data from a datasource and present these in their own design element, in the form of an SVG. The SVG files are renamed to .php in order to insert the dynamic data from the datasource.
Then, I'm using inview javascript to initialize a function that animates the data from the source, from 0 to their actual value. However, I notice this gets kinda heavy on the browser, when there are a lot of elements that are running the animate function.
Is there perhaps a smarter way of doing this? I haven't really dug that much into it, because it's not that bad. I just happened to notice the lag when scrolling through the area being repainted.
Here's my js code:
$('.inview article').bind('inview', function(event, isInView, visiblePartX, visiblePartY) {
if (isInView) {
// element is now visible in the viewport
if (visiblePartY == 'top' || visiblePartY == 'both' || visiblePartY == 'bottom') {
var $this = $(this);
var element = $($this);
$this.addClass('active');
reinitializeText(element);
$this.unbind('inview');
// top part of element is visible
} else if (visiblePartY == 'bottom') {
} else {
}
} else {
}
});
function reinitializeText(element) {
var svg = element.find('svg');
var children = svg.children('.infographics_svg-text');
// If there is no class in svg file, search other elements for the class
if (children.length == 0) {
var children = element.find('.infographics_svg-text');
}
children.each(function (){
var step = this.textContent/100;
var round = false;
if (this.textContent.indexOf('.') !=-1) {
round = true;
}
animateText(this, 0, step, round);
});
}
function animateText(element, current, step, round) {
if (current > 100) return;
var num = current++ *step;
if (round) {
num = Math.round((num)*100)/100
} else {
num = Math.round(num);
}
element.textContent = num;
setTimeout(function() {
animateText(element, current, step, round);
}, 10);
}
Edit: Because of the difference in data values received from the source (low numbers to huge numbers), The speed of the animation is increased so it doesn't go on forever

Related

Scroll to pure javascript not working

Yes I am avoiding a 3rd party lib on purpose, very small app on mobile device and don't want to pull anything.
I am trying to scroll to elements on a page using this scrollTo function:
function scrollTo(element, to, duration) {
if (duration <= 0) return;
var difference = to - element.scrollTop;
var perTick = difference / duration * 10;
setTimeout(function() {
element.scrollTop = element.scrollTop + perTick;
if (element.scrollTop === to) return;
scrollTo(element, to, duration - 10);
}, 10);
}
I grab a list of span tags that I want to use as my scroll points each time the user clicks a next button:
var index = null;
function next() {
var list = document.querySelectorAll("span");
var element = null;
if (index == null) {
index = -1;
element = document.body;
} else {
element = list[index];
}
index++;
if (index >= list.length) {
return;
}
var to = list[index];
scrollTo(element, to.offsetTop, 250);
}
The first next click properly scrolls to the first element. However the next click does not scroll. I debugged into the scrollTo method and it seems the element.scrollTop variable is not changing each time it is assigned. Any ideas?
You musst change the element.scrollTop of the element you want to scroll on, in this case document.body. You are only doing this in the first call. After that you´re always scrolling on the list item which is your target (what has no effect, since it has no overflow).
You should call your scrollTop like this:
scrollTo(document.body, to.offsetTop, 250);
Maybe you should also take a look at
window.scrollTo()
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/API/Window/scrollTo
I was not able to replicate your exact issue, but what I did find was that I was not able to get to the last span with the way your code was written. To get around that, I rewrote a few things. It may fix the issue for you.
function next() {
var list = document.querySelectorAll("span");
var element = null;
if (index == null) {
index = -1;
element = document.body;
} else {
element = list[index];
}
if (index >= list.length) {
return;
}
if(index >= 0)
{
var to = list[index];
scrollTo(element, to.offsetTop, 250);
}
index++;
}
Essentially, you were trying to increment your index too soon causing it to never process the last span.

Nonconcurrent async recursion

My end goal is to mitigate as much lag (window freezing/stuttering) as possible, giving the client a responsive window from page load.
My program is a Chrome extension, and part of it needs to search through a reddit submission, including all comments for certain words and then do some stuff with them. After this answer, I converted my code to use setInterval for the recursive search. Unforutnately, this runs concurrently, so even though each branch in the comment tree is delayed from its parent, the overall search overlaps each other, negating any benefit in the delay.
I have a solution, but I don't know how to implement it.
The solution would be to have a callback when a branch runs out that goes to the nearest parent fork. This in effect would traverse the comment tree linearly and would allow the setInterval (or probably setTimeout would be more appropriate) to have a noticeable affect.
The code that would need to be changed is:
function highlightComments(){
var elems = $(".content .usertext-body > .md");
var index = 0;
var total = elems.length;
console.log("comments started");
var intId = setInterval(function(){
highlightField(elems.get(index));
index++;
if(index == total){
clearInterval(intId);
addOnClick();
console.log("comments finished");
}
}, 25);
}
and highlightField is:
function highlightField(node) {
var found = $(node).attr("data-ggdc-found") === "1";
var contents = $.makeArray($(node).contents());
var index = 0;
var total = contents.length;
if (total == 0){
return;
}
var intId = setInterval(function() {
if (contents[index].nodeType === 3) { // Text
if (!found){
//Mods
var content = contents[index].nodeValue.replace(new RegExp(data.mods.regex, "gi"), data.mods.replacement);
//Creators
content = content.replace(new RegExp(data.creators.regex, "gi"), data.creators.replacement);
//Blacklist
for (var key in data.blacklist.regex){
if(data.blacklist.regex.hasOwnProperty(key)){
content = content.replace(new RegExp(data.blacklist.regex[key], "gi"), data.blacklist.replacement[key]);
}
}
if (content !== contents[index].nodeValue) {
$(contents[index]).replaceWith(content);
}
}
} else if (contents[index].nodeType === 1) { // Element
highlightField(contents[index]);
}
index++;
if(index == total){
clearInterval(intId);
}
}, 25);
}

Javascript "For" Loop not working?

I have a Javascript file that I am using to try to animate a dropdown menu. I have the "Toggle" function in that file set to run when I click on a certain div. Here's the script I'm using:
var up = true;
function Toggle(x)
{
if (up)
{
for (var i = x.offsetTop; i <= 0; i++)
{
x.style.top = i;
if (i == 0)
{
up = false;
}
}
}
else if (up == false)
{
for (var i = x.offsetTop; i >= -50; i--)
{
x.style.top = i;
if (i == -50)
{
up = true;
}
}
}
}
In the HTML div I want to animate, I have the "onclick" property set to "onclick=Toggle(this)". The first for loop works as it should (it sets the div's top offset to 0). However, the second for loop doesn't set the offsetTop. I know that the for loop is activating because I've tested it and it gives me every integer between 0 and -50. Why isn't it setting the offset position?
1) You must specify a unit to the top ie: x.style.top = i +"px"
2) Your function won't animate instead of you use a setInterval or a setTimeout
Like you asked, an example. I wouldn't do it like this for one of my project, but i kept your function to make you more familiar with the code.
I Used setTimeout instead of setInterval because setInterval must be cleared when not needed and setTimeout is just launched one time :
var Toggle = (function() { // use scope to define up/down
var up = true;
return function(element) {
var top = parseInt(element.style.top, 10); // element.offsetTop ?
if ( !top ) {
top = 0;
}
if (up) {
if (element.offsetTop < 0) { // if we are not at 0 and want to get up
element.style.top = (top+1) + "px";
setTimeout(function() { Toggle(element); }, 10); // recall the function in 10 ms
} else { // we change up value
up = !up;
}
}
else {
if (element.offsetTop > -50) {
element.style.top = (top-1) + "px";
setTimeout(function() { Toggle(element); }, 10); // recall the function in 10 ms
} else {
up=!up;
}
}
}
})();
You'd have to use x.style.top = i + 'px' as top and similar css properties must define the type (px, em, %, etc.) unless they are 0, as this is 0 in any case.
But your script would actually snap the div directly to -50px, as you do not wait between those iteration steps.
I'd recommend to use a library like jQuery to use it's animate() method.
function Toggle(obj) {
$(obj).animate({
top: parseInt($(obj).css('top')) === 0 ? '-50px' : '0px'
})
}

javascript 'over-clicking' bug

I have a bug in Javascript where I am animating the margin left property of a parent container to show its child divs in a sort of next/previous fashion. Problem is if clicking 'next' at a high frequency the if statement seems to be ignored (i.e. only works if click, wait for animation, then click again) :
if (marLeft === (-combinedWidth + (regWidth) + "px")) {
//roll margin back to 0
}
An example can be seen on jsFiddle - http://jsfiddle.net/ZQg5V/
Any help would be appreciated.
Try the below code which will basically check if the container is being animated just return from the function.
Working demo
$next.click(function (e) {
e.preventDefault();
if($contain.is(":animated")){
return;
}
var marLeft = $contain.css('margin-left'),
$this = $(this);
if (marLeft === (-combinedWidth + (regWidth) + "px")) {
$contain.animate({
marginLeft: 0
}, function () {
$back.fadeOut('fast');
});
} else {
$back.fadeIn(function () {
$contain.animate({
marginLeft: "-=" + regWidth + "px"
});
});
}
if (marLeft > -combinedWidth) {
$contain.animate({
marginLeft: 0
});
}
});
Sometimes is better if you create a function to take care of the animation, instead of writting animation code on every event handler (next, back). Also, users won't have to wait for the animation to finish in order to go the nth page/box.
Maybe this will help you:
if (jQuery) {
var $next = $(".next"),
$back = $(".back"),
$box = $(".box"),
regWidth = $box.width(),
$contain = $(".wrap")
len = $box.length;
var combinedWidth = regWidth*len;
$contain.width(combinedWidth);
var currentBox = 0; // Keeps track of current box
var goTo = function(n) {
$contain.animate({
marginLeft: -n*regWidth
}, {
queue: false, // We don't want animations to queue
duration: 600
});
if (n == 0) $back.fadeOut('fast');
else $back.fadeIn('fast');
currentBox = n;
};
$next.click(function(e) {
e.preventDefault();
var go = currentBox + 1;
if (go >= len) go = 0; // Index based, instead of margin based...
goTo(go);
});
$back.click(function(e) {
e.preventDefault();
var go = currentBox - 1;
if (go <= 0) go = 0; //In case back is pressed while fading...
goTo(go);
});
}
Here's an updated version of your jsFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/victmo/ZQg5V/5/
Cheers!
Use a variable to track if the animation is taking place. Pseudocode:
var animating = false;
function myAnimation() {
if (animating) return;
animating = true;
$(this).animate({what:'ever'}, function() {
animating = false;
});
}
Crude, but it should give you the idea.
Edit: Your current code works fine for me as well, even if I jam out on the button. On firefox.

Can i create a javascript carousel which contains a flash file as well as static images?

I was wondering if it's possible to include an swf within a javascript carousel that currently just contains stagic images. What I'm looking to do is include a flash animation within the carousel.
I guess I've got two main questions:
Is it possible to cycle through flash files in the same way as an image?
How would I get the javascript and flash to interact so the flash file would know when it had been selected?
If it helps, here's the js we're using:
$(document).ready(function(){
var $looper = true;
var timer;
var currentSlide = 0;
var cell = 0;
var row = 1;
var hCycles = 0;
var aCycles = 0;
//no. of full cycles
var homecycles = 2;
var aboutcycles = 2;
//aboutSlide speed
var fast = 1200;
var slow = 4000;
//hide homepage slides
$('#slide2').fadeOut(0);
$('#slide3').fadeOut(0);
$('#slide4').fadeOut(0);
$('#slide5').fadeOut(0);
$('#slide6').fadeOut(0);
//hide about slides
$('.a-slide1').fadeOut(0);
$('.a-slide2').fadeOut(0);
$('.a-slide3').fadeOut(0);
$('.a-slide4').fadeOut(0);
$('#slide-c1 .a-slide1').fadeIn(1200);
runSlide(fast);
function runSlide(x) {
if ($('body').is('.about')) {
setTimeout(function() {
aboutSlides();
}, x);
} else {
if ($looper) {
setTimeout(function() {
slideShow();
}, 4000);
}
}
}
function slideShow() {
if ($looper) {
if (currentSlide++ < 6 && hCycles < homecycles) {
$('#slide'+ currentSlide).fadeOut(1200);
if (currentSlide == 6) {
$('#slide1').fadeIn(1200);
$('#slide-wrapper li').removeClass('active');
$('#btn1').addClass('active');
currentSlide = 0;
hCycles = hCycles+1;
} else {
$('#slide'+ (currentSlide+1)).fadeIn(1200);
$('#slide-wrapper li').removeClass('active');
$('#btn'+ (currentSlide+1)).addClass('active');
}
runSlide();
} else {
$looper = false;
}
}
};
$('#slide-wrapper li').each(function(index) {
$('#btn'+(index+1)).click(function(){
$looper = false;
$('.slide').fadeOut(1200);
$('#slide'+ (index+1)).fadeIn(1200);
$('#slide-wrapper li').removeClass('active');
$(this).addClass('active');
});
});
function aboutSlides() {
if (cell++ < 3 && aCycles < aboutcycles) {
if (cell == 3) {
if (row < 3) {
row = row+1;
} else {
row = 1;
aCycles = aCycles+1;
}
var hide = (row-1);
if ((row-1) == 0) {hide = 3}
$('#slide-c1 .a-slide'+ hide).fadeOut(1200);
$('#slide-c1 .a-slide'+row).fadeIn(1200);
cell = 0;
runSlide(fast);
} else {
$('#slide-c'+(cell+1)+' .a-slide'+ (row-1)).fadeOut(1200);
$('#slide-c'+(cell+1)+' .a-slide'+(row)).fadeIn(1200);
if (cell == 2) {
runSlide(slow);
} else {
runSlide(fast);
}
}
} else {
// create the final strip
$('#slide-c3 .a-slide3').fadeOut(1200);
$('#slide-c3 .a-slide4').fadeIn(1200);
}
}
});
Thanks!
There isn't any problem as to whatever content you want to put in your slides. As long as it is valid html, it's valid in a slide. Countless jquery/motools/etc plugins let you specify whatever you want for content.
flash is valid.
But you might want to revert to another revealing method. setting the opacity on a swf from javascript is complex and yields to different results, according to browser and flash version. If your flash file is custom made, then you can create a function that fades it to white for example, and call it from javascript. But from experience, changing the opacity of a swf is calling for trouble.
I don't know if this is relevant enough to be an answer, I wanted to post it as a comment, but there isn't any comment button. Oh well.

Categories

Resources