i'm looking to implement 'Yui Test' in my website to use the TDD methodology. I've also installed the yuitest CLI (npm install -g yuitest).
I don't know how organize my files, i thought to leave the js code in my 'www/js/functions.js' file and create a new file 'www/js/tests.js' where to put my tests.
The issue is that i don'w know how connect different files. I'll try to explain.
In my 'www/js/tests.js' file i've this code (by example on website):
var testCase = new Y.Test.Case({
name: "TestCase Name",
//---------------------------------------------
// Special instructions
//---------------------------------------------
_should: {
error: {
testSortArray: true //this test should throw an error
}
},
//---------------------------------------------
// Tests
//---------------------------------------------
testSortArray: function () {
sortArray(12); //this should throw an error
}
});
and in my 'www/js/functions.js' file i've this function:
function sortArray(array) {
if (array instanceof Array){
array.sort();
} else {
throw new TypeError("Expected an array");
}
}
Obviously it didn't works because when i run the test 'yuitest www/js/tests.js' it didn't see my function in 'www/js/functions.js' file.
Obviously if i move the function from 'www/js/functions.js' file to 'www/js/tests.js' file, it works.
But i need to leave separate these files. Any suggestions?
Thanks!
I use a tests.html page to bring in all necessary resources and to execute the tests.
so tests.html will:
include YUI
include functions.js
include tests.js
create a Y.Test.Suite which includes all my tests
call Y.Test.Runner.add(mySuite)
create a Y.Test.Console to render my results
call Y.Test.Runner.run();
You could also probably use the YUI loader to load up your functions.js too, but I've not tried that (largely because my code under test is all YUI modules, so the loader can laod and work with them just fine)
One alternative is to use modules. Add a module to YUI and use it in your test. If you use namespaces, it could look like this:
In www/js/functions.js:
YUI.add('my-module', function (Y) {
Y.namespace('MyNamespace');
Y.MyNamespace.SortArray = function(array) {
if (array instanceof Array){
array.sort();
} else {
throw new TypeError("Expected an array");
}
}
});
In www/js/tests.js:
YUI().use('test', 'my-module', function (Y) {
var testCase = new Y.Test.Case({
name: "TestCase Name",
//---------------------------------------------
// Tests
//---------------------------------------------
testSortArray: function () {
Y.MyNamespace.SortArray(12); //this should throw an error
}
});
});
See Creating YUI Modules.
To make the Loader aware of the my-module, look at this example, from the same page:
YUI.GlobalConfig: {
groups: {
mymodules: {
base: '/www/js/',
modules: {
'my-module': {
path: 'functions.js'
}
}
}
}
};
For Loader config options, take a look at the docs.
Related
I'm trying to integrate systemJS in my current project which is using angular 1.5 syntax. I want to load sum.js file using system js , which in turn calls reduce.js and add.js using commonJS syntax .
currently all the build files are being generated though gulp.
I'm not using any transpiler because as per my understanding they are needed for ES6.
My Systemjs.config.js file looks like this:
console.log("in systemjs config");
SystemJS.config({
map: {
'wire': 'app/Test/js'
},
packages: {
'wire': {
main: './sum.js'
}
}
}
});
SystemJS.import('wire').then(function(wire) {
console.log('Module', wire);
});
console.log("end of systemjs config");
sum.js file has this content:
console.log("inside sum file first line");
var reduce = require("./reduce");
var add = require("./add");
function sum(list){
return reduce(list, add, 0);
};
module.exports = sum;
console.log("inside sum file");
reduce.js has this content:
function reduce(list, iteratee, memo) {
list.forEach(function (item) {
memo = iteratee(item, memo);
});
return memo;
}
module.exports = reduce;
add.js looks like this:
function add(a,b){
return a + b;
}
module.exports = add;
I can see system JS file being loaded in debugger(network tab) but not sum.js file, neither i can see any console message , which I have added in sum.js for debugging.
I think I'm missing some basic configuration steps. Please help
I know some inner functionality inside Webpack. Something about dependencies, template, and module building. However, there is little comment inside its source and no full document site for now. So, i can't chain them all to deal with my problem.
With my current requirement, i need to render specific module with custom source template (similar to this MultiModule in webpack).
Note: To be clear, the generated module's dependency array is not static. For example, one time it may be ['./a', './b', './c'], another time it may be ['./b', './c','./d']. That is up to some dynamic config before build.
For more detail example, i need a module call main.js. In build time, it need to be dynamically generated with target dependencies like(for being not sure which modules would be dependencies):
// main.js
var a = require('./a')
var b = require('./b')
var c = require('./c')
var d = require('./d')
...
In fact, if i only need to dynamically require them all, i can just construct an entry point dynamically.
// webpack.config.js
{
entry: {
main: [
'./a',
'./b',
'./c',
...
]
},
}
and it(webpack) will generate a module may like this：
__webpack_require__(1);
__webpack_require__(2);
__webpack_require__(3);
return __webpack_require__(4);
But i need to do something more:
var a = __webpack_require__(1);
var b = __webpack_require__(2);
var c = __webpack_require__(3);
var d = __webpack_require__(4);
...
// do something with a,b,c,d... under my custom need
...
return somthing or nothing;
As you guys who know about webpack, it's very very complicated and hard to understand and track its plugin(event) hierarchy.
Need some expertise! :)
I'm sorry foy my unclear question before.
However, there is some kind of weird atmosphere. I set up a bounty for attention and guidance. Someone's free-minded answer drove me to make comment with impoliteness somehow. And then some peacemaker shows up with comments unrelated to the question or answer. That sucks.
Focusing on that thing just makes things worse and nothing helped. Not letting it go just means someone has petty mind.
Either lacking attention and lacking expert or not, I have to fight it myself. Fortunately, digging into webpack makes some progress.
Prerequisite
The day before popular webpack, there are fashions like grunt and gulp to construct a custom build flow (with their plugins). They can achieve most of custom requirement, especially generating a custom module(which webpack doesn't have obvious and direct way to deal with).
when you come to do something like automatic collecting custom dependencies, then generating a custom module is the next essential step. It can be commonly seen in product line/family design.
Solutions
#1
This is the simplest and direct way but lack of flexibility.
The source method of MultiModule is to generate the entry module with multi-dependencies. Just overriding it will hit the target.
// hack.js
const MultiModule = require('webpack/lib/MultiModule')
MultiModule.prototype.source = function(dependencyTemplates, outputOptions) {
var str = ['"hello world";\n'];
this.dependencies.forEach(function (dep, idx) {
if (dep.module) {
if (idx === this.dependencies.length - 1)
str.push("module.exports = ");
str.push("__webpack_require__(");
if (outputOptions.pathinfo)
str.push("/*! " + dep.request + " */");
str.push("" + JSON.stringify(dep.module.id));
str.push(")");
} else {
str.push("(function webpackMissingModule() { throw new Error(");
str.push(JSON.stringify("Cannot find module \"" + dep.request + "\""));
str.push("); }())");
}
str.push(";\n");
}, this);
return new RawSource(str.join(""));
}
At the fifth line, i add a string statement "hello world;"\n, nothing else changed.
module.exports = {
entry: {
main: ["./a", "./b"],
}
// something else
}
the output main.js may look like:
//...
/* 0 */
/*!******************!*\
!*** multi main ***!
\******************/
/***/ function(module, exports, __webpack_require__) {
"hello world";
__webpack_require__(/*! ./a */1);
module.exports = __webpack_require__(/*! ./b */2);
/***/ }
//...
Now we can do what we want with the source method, with the compatibility in mind.
#2
This way is much more flexible but also complex.
It requires at lease 5 files(sources are too long, I made them into snippets):
CustomMultiModule.js:
// CustomMultiModule.js
const MultiModule = require('webpack/lib/MultiModule')
const RawSource = require('webpack/lib/RawSource')
class CustomMultiModule extends MultiModule {
constructor(...args) {
super(...args)
}
source(dependencyTemplates, outputOptions) {
var str = ['"hello world";'];
this.dependencies.forEach(function(dep, idx) {
if (dep.module) {
if (idx === this.dependencies.length - 1)
str.push("module.exports = ");
str.push("__webpack_require__(");
if (outputOptions.pathinfo)
str.push("/*! " + dep.request + " */");
str.push("" + JSON.stringify(dep.module.id));
str.push(")");
} else {
str.push("(function webpackMissingModule() { throw new Error(");
str.push(JSON.stringify("Cannot find module \"" + dep.request + "\""));
str.push("); }())");
}
str.push(";\n");
}, this);
return new RawSource(str.join(""));
}
}
module.exports = CustomMultiModule
CustomMultiModuleFactory.js:
// CustomMultiModuleFactory.js
const MultiModuleFactory = require('webpack/lib/MultiModuleFactory')
const CustomMultiModule = require('./CustomMultiModule')
class CustomMultiModuleFactory extends MultiModuleFactory {
constructor() {
super()
}
create(context, dependency, callback) {
callback(null, new CustomMultiModule(context, dependency.dependencies, dependency.name));
};
}
module.exports = CustomMultiModuleFactory
CustomMultiEntryPlugin.js:
// CustomMultiEntryPlugin.js
const MultiEntryPlugin = require('webpack/lib/MultiEntryPlugin')
const MultiEntryDependency = require('webpack/lib/dependencies/MultiEntryDependency')
const CustomMultiModuleFactory = require('./CustomMultiModuleFactory')
class CustomMultiEntryPlugin extends MultiEntryPlugin {
constructor(context, entries, name) {
super(context, entries, name)
}
apply(compiler) {
compiler.plugin('after-plugins', function(compiler) {
compiler.plugin("compilation", function(compilation, params) {
var multiModuleFactory = new CustomMultiModuleFactory();
compilation.dependencyFactories.set(MultiEntryDependency, multiModuleFactory);
})
})
}
}
module.exports = CustomMultiEntryPlugin
CustomEntryOptionPlugin.js:
// CustomEntryOptionPlugin.js
const CustomMultiEntryPlugin = require('./CustomMultiEntryPlugin')
class CustomEntryOptionPlugin {
constructor() {}
apply(compiler) {
compiler.plugin("entry-option", function(context, entry) {
if (typeof entry === "object") {
Object.keys(entry).forEach(function(name) {
if (Array.isArray(entry[name])) {
compiler.apply(new CustomMultiEntryPlugin(context, entry[name], name));
}
});
}
});
}
}
module.exports = CustomEntryOptionPlugin
webpack.config.js:
// webpack.config.js
const CustomEntryOptionPlugin = require('./CustomEntryOptionPlugin')
module.exports = {
entry: {
main: ["./a", "/b"] // this dependencies array may be generated
...
},
output: {
path: path.join(__dirname, "js"),
pathinfo: true,
filename: "[name].[chunkhash].js",
chunkFilename: "[chunkhash].js"
}
plugins: [
new CustomEntryOptionPlugin(),
...
]
...
};
With the code above, we can achieve the same as #1. And we can gain more control over the target entry or other requirements, if we want.
Often in webpack you're only requiring one file, and maybe different libs that the files depend on. If you require main, then webpack is going to resolve the dependencies based on the CommonJS syntax which you can read about here. Does removing the extra requirements in your webpack.config.js file solve this? e.g. having only the following as the config:
// webpack.config.js
{
entry: [ "./main" ],
...
}
It sounds like you don't really understand how webpack works-- the idea of it is to emulate how Node's CommonJS syntax allows your javascript to be modular and placed in separate files, while also being performant and not requiring tons of AJAX requests by your browser. If you want to read more about Webpack's config file, check out this page.
As a side note, returning at the end of the module does absolutely nothing. If you want to export, you can use module.exports, but having a line like return true or something at the end of your main.js file doesn't get caught anywhere meaningful.
I'm trying to adapt a gulp file to my purposes and I'm running into issues. I only care about one task:
gulp.task('js:browser', function () {
return mergeStream.apply(null,
Object.keys(jsBundles).map(function(key) {
return bundle(jsBundles[key], key);
})
);
});
It is using browserify to condense my bundle into a usable single file. It uses these two methods and this object:
function createBundle(src) {
//if the source is not an array, make it one
if (!src.push) {
src = [src];
}
var customOpts = {
entries: src,
debug: true
};
var opts = assign({}, watchify.args, customOpts);
var b = watchify(browserify(opts));
b.transform(babelify.configure({
stage: 1
}));
b.transform(hbsfy);
b.on('log', plugins.util.log);
return b;
}
function bundle(b, outputPath) {
var splitPath = outputPath.split('/');
var outputFile = splitPath[splitPath.length - 1];
var outputDir = splitPath.slice(0, -1).join('/');
console.log(outputFile);
console.log(plugins);
return b.bundle()
// log errors if they happen
.on('error', plugins.util.log.bind(plugins.util, 'Browserify Error'))
.pipe(source(outputFile))
// optional, remove if you don't need to buffer file contents
.pipe(buffer())
// optional, remove if you dont want sourcemaps
.pipe(plugins.sourcemaps.init({loadMaps: true})) // loads map from browserify file
// Add transformation tasks to the pipeline here.
.pipe(plugins.sourcemaps.write('./')) // writes .map file
.pipe(gulp.dest('build/public/' + outputDir));
}
var jsBundles = {
'js/polyfills/promise.js': createBundle('./public/js/polyfills/promise.js'),
'js/polyfills/url.js': createBundle('./public/js/polyfills/url.js'),
'js/settings.js': createBundle('./public/js/settings/index.js'),
'js/main.js': createBundle('./public/js/main/index.js'),
'js/remote-executor.js': createBundle('./public/js/remote-executor/index.js'),
'js/idb-test.js': createBundle('./public/js/idb-test/index.js'),
'sw.js': createBundle(['./public/js/sw/index.js', './public/js/sw/preroll/index.js'])
};
When I run the gulp task js:bower I get the following error coming from the the .pipe(plugins.sourcemaps.init({loadMaps: true})) expression:
TypeError: Cannot read property 'init' of undefined
I know that the lines are optional and I can just comment them out, but I do want them. When I run the code in the example file it works properly, when I run it in my gulp file it gives me the error. Any suggestions on what I might be missing? Thanks!
gulp-load-plugins analyzes the contents of your package.json file to find out which Gulp plugins you have installed. Make sure that gulp-sourcemaps is among the "devDependencies" defined there. If not run
npm install --save-dev gulp-sourcemaps
There's a small chance that your problem is related to lazy loading the sourcemaps plugin. If the above doesn't help try requiring gulp-load-plugins like this:
var plugins = require('gulp-load-plugins')({lazy:false});
How do I require() / import modules from the console? For example, say I've installed the ImmutableJS npm, I'd like to be able to use functions from the module while I'm working in the console.
Here's another more generic way of doing this.
Requiring a module by ID
The current version of WebPack exposes webpackJsonp(...), which can be used to require a module by ID:
function _requireById(id) {
return webpackJsonp([], null, [id]);
}
or in TypeScript
window['_requireById'] =
(id: number): any => window['webpackJsonp'];([], null, [id]);
The ID is visible at the top of the module in the bundled file or in the footer of the original source file served via source maps.
Requiring a module by name
Requiring a module by name is much trickier, as WebPack doesn't appear to keep any reference to the module path once it has processed all the sources. But the following code seems to do the trick in lot of the cases:
/**
* Returns a promise that resolves to the result of a case-sensitive search
* for a module or one of its exports. `makeGlobal` can be set to true
* or to the name of the window property it should be saved as.
* Example usage:
* _requireByName('jQuery', '$');
* _requireByName('Observable', true)´;
*/
window['_requireByName'] =
(name: string, makeGlobal?: (string|boolean)): Promise<any> =>
getAllModules()
.then((modules) => {
let returnMember;
let module = _.find<any, any>(modules, (module) => {
if (_.isObject(module.exports) && name in module.exports) {
returnMember = true;
return true;
} else if (_.isFunction(module.exports) &&
module.exports.name === name) {
return true;
}
});
if (module) {
module = returnMember ? module.exports[name] : module.exports;
if (makeGlobal) {
const moduleName = makeGlobal === true ? name : makeGlobal as string;
window[moduleName] = module;
console.log(`Module or module export saved as 'window.${moduleName}':`,
module);
} else {
console.log(`Module or module export 'name' found:`, module);
}
return module;
}
console.warn(`Module or module export '${name}'' could not be found`);
return null;
});
// Returns promise that resolves to all installed modules
function getAllModules() {
return new Promise((resolve) => {
const id = _.uniqueId('fakeModule_');
window['webpackJsonp'](
[],
{[id]: function(module, exports, __webpack_require__) {
resolve(__webpack_require__.c);
}},
[id]
);
});
}
This is quick first shot at this, so it's all up for improvement!
Including this in a module will allow require([modules], function) to be used from a browser
window['require'] = function(modules, callback) {
var modulesToRequire = modules.forEach(function(module) {
switch(module) {
case 'immutable': return require('immutable');
case 'jquery': return require('jquery');
}
})
callback.apply(this, modulesToRequire);
}
Example Usage:
require(['jquery', 'immutable'], function($, immutable) {
// immutable and $ are defined here
});
Note: Each switch-statement option should either be something this module already requires, or provided by ProvidePlugin
Sources:
Based on this answer, which can be used to add an entire folder.
Alternative method from Webpack Docs - which allows something like require.yourModule.function()
I found a way that works, for both WebPack 1 and 2. (as long as the source is non-minified)
Repo: https://github.com/Venryx/webpack-runtime-require
Install
npm install --save webpack-runtime-require
Usage
First, require the module at least once.
import "webpack-runtime-require";
It will then add a Require() function to the window object, for use in the console, or anywhere in your code.
Then just use it, like so:
let React = Require("react");
console.log("Retrieved React.Component: " + React.Component);
It's not very pretty (it uses regexes to search the module wrapper functions) or fast (takes ~50ms the first call, and ~0ms after), but both of these are perfectly fine if it's just for hack-testing in the console.
Technique
The below is a trimmed version of the source to show how it works. (see the repo for the full/latest)
var WebpackData;
webpackJsonp([],
{123456: function(module, exports, __webpack_require__) {
WebpackData = __webpack_require__;
}},
[123456]
);
var allModulesText;
var moduleIDs = {};
function GetIDForModule(name) {
if (allModulesText == null) {
let moduleWrapperFuncs = Object.keys(WebpackData.m).map(moduleID=>WebpackData.m[moduleID]);
allModulesText = moduleWrapperFuncs.map(a=>a.toString()).join("\n\n\n");
// these are examples of before and after webpack's transformation: (which the regex below finds the var-name of)
// require("react-redux-firebase") => var _reactReduxFirebase = __webpack_require__(100);
// require("./Source/MyComponent") => var _MyComponent = __webpack_require__(200);
let regex = /var ([a-zA-Z_]+) = __webpack_require__\(([0-9]+)\)/g;
let matches = [];
let match;
while (match = regex.exec(allModulesText))
matches.push(match);
for (let [_, varName, id] of matches) {
// these are examples of before and after the below regex's transformation:
// _reactReduxFirebase => react-redux-firebase
// _MyComponent => my-component
// _MyComponent_New => my-component-new
// _JSONHelper => json-helper
let moduleName = varName
.replace(/^_/g, "") // remove starting "_"
.replace(new RegExp( // convert chars where:
"([^_])" // is preceded by a non-underscore char
+ "[A-Z]" // is a capital-letter
+ "([^A-Z_])", // is followed by a non-capital-letter, non-underscore char
"g"),
str=>str[0] + "-" + str[1] + str[2] // to: "-" + char
)
.replace(/_/g, "-") // convert all "_" to "-"
.toLowerCase(); // convert all letters to lowercase
moduleIDs[moduleName] = parseInt(id);
}
}
return moduleIDs[name];
}
function Require(name) {
let id = GetIDForModule(name);
return WebpackData.c[id].exports;
}
Being able to use require modules in the console is handy for debugging and code analysis. #psimyn's answer is very specific so you aren't likely to maintain that function with all the modules you might need.
When I need one of my own modules for this purpose, I assign a window property to it so I can get at it e.g window.mymodule = whatever_im_exporting;. I use the same trick to expose a system module if I want to play with it e.g:
myservice.js:
let $ = require('jquery');
let myService = {};
// local functions service props etc...
module.exports = myService;
// todo: remove these window prop assignments when done playing in console
window.$ = $;
window.myService = myService;
It is still a bit of a pain, but digging into the bundles, I can't see any way to conveniently map over modules.
The answer from #Rene Hamburger is good but unfortunately doesn't work anymore (at least with my webpack version). So I updated it:
function getWebpackInternals() {
return new Promise((resolve) => {
const id = 'fakeId' + Math.random();
window['webpackJsonp'].push(["web", {
[id]: function(module, __webpack_exports__, __webpack_require__) {
resolve([module, __webpack_exports__, __webpack_require__])
}
},[[id]]]);
});
}
function getModuleByExportName(moduleName) {
return getWebpackInternals().then(([_, __webpack_exports__, __webpack_require__]) => {
const modules = __webpack_require__.c;
const moduleFound = Object.values(modules).find(module => {
if (module && module.exports && module.exports[moduleName]) return true;
});
if (!moduleFound) {
console.log('couldnt find module ' + moduleName);
return;
}
return moduleFound.exports[moduleName];
})
}
getModuleByExportName('ExportedClassOfModule');
expose-loader is, in my opinion, a more elegant solution:
require("expose-loader?libraryName!./file.js");
// Exposes the exports for file.js to the global context on property "libraryName".
// In web browsers, window.libraryName is then available.
Adding the below code to one of your modules will allow you to load modules by id.
window.require = __webpack_require__;
In the console use the following:
require(34)
You could do something similar as psimyn advised by
adding following code to some module in bundle:
require.ensure([], function () {
window.require = function (module) {
return require(module);
};
});
Use require from console:
require("./app").doSomething();
See more
After making an npm module for this (see my other answer), I did a search on npms.io and seem to have found an existing webpack-plugin available for this purpose.
Repo: https://www.npmjs.com/package/webpack-expose-require-plugin
Install
npm install --save webpack-expose-require-plugin
Usage
Add the plugin to your webpack config, then use at runtime like so:
let MyComponent = require.main("./path/to/MyComponent");
console.log("Retrieved MyComponent: " + MyComponent);
See package/repo readme page for more info.
EDIT
I tried the plugin out in my own project, but couldn't get it to work; I kept getting the error: Cannot read property 'resource' of undefined. I'll leave it here in case it works for other people, though. (I'm currently using the solution mentioned above instead)
After both making my own npm package for this (see here), as well as finding an existing one (see here), I also found a way to do it in one-line just using the built-in webpack functions.
It uses WebPack "contexts": https://webpack.github.io/docs/context.html
Just add the following line to a file directly in your "Source" folder:
window.Require = require.context("./", true, /\.js$/);
Now you can use it (eg. in the console) like so:
let MyComponent = Require("./Path/To/MyComponent");
console.log("Retrieved MyComponent: " + MyComponent);
However, one important drawback of this approach, as compared to the two solutions mentioned above, is that it seems to not work for files in the node_modules folder. When the path is adjusted to "../", webpack fails to compile -- at least in my project. (perhaps because the node_modules folder is just so massive)
Our extension (Addon SDK) looking for new files in folder C:\scan and send it to server. Every second extension look for latest file creation time and defined it as latest.(compare new file creation time and file creation time 1 sec ago.)
Files put to C:\scan from scanner Brother 7050 on Windows 7.
But sometimes into console.error we see:
Exception
message: "Component returned failure code: 0x8052000e (NS_ERROR_FILE_IS_LOCKED)
[nsIFileInputStream.init]",
result: 2152857614,
name: "NS_ERROR_FILE_IS_LOCKED"
I think Brother 7050 application have no time to unlock file before our extension can start to read it.
Q: How we can read latest file in folder true way without read file lock error?
/*
adr- folder path
array2 - array for search
mode - search or not search in array2 (0-1)
*/
function getfilelist(adr,array2, mode)
{
filelist2=[];
filelist2[0]="";
filelist2[1]=0;
var file = new FileUtils.File(adr);
var enumerator = file.directoryEntries;
while (enumerator.hasMoreElements())
{
inner = enumerator.getNext().QueryInterface(Ci.nsIFile);
if (inner.isFile())
{
namearray=inner.leafName.split(".");
r=namearray[namearray.length-1];
if (r=="jpg" || r=="jpeg")
{
if (mode==0)
{
if (inner.lastModifiedTime>filelist2[1])
{
filelist2[0]=inner.leafName;
filelist2[1]=inner.lastModifiedTime;
}
}
else if (mode==1)
{
if (inner.lastModifiedTime>array2[1] && inner.isReadable()==true)
return inner.leafName;
}
}
}
}
if (mode==0)
{
return filelist2;
}
return false;
}
The reason why you see NS_ERROR_FILE_IS_LOCKED is most likely that the file is still being written and you are trying to access it too early. However, it is also possible that some other software immediately locks the file to check it, e.g. your anti-virus.
Either way, there is no way to ignore the lock. Even if you could, you might get an incomplete file as a result. What you should do is noting that exception and remembering that you should try to read that file on next run. Something along these lines:
var {Cr} = require("chrome");
var unaccessible = null;
setInterval(checknewfiles, 1000);
function checknewfiles()
{
var files = getfilelist(...);
if (unaccessible)
{
// Add any files that we failed to read before to the end of the list
files.push.apply(files, unaccessible);
unaccessible = null;
}
for (var file of files)
{
try
{
readfile(file);
}
except(e if e.result == Cr.NS_ERROR_FILE_IS_LOCKED)
{
if (!unaccessible)
unaccessible = [];
unaccessible.push(file);
}
}
}
For reference:
Components.results
Chrome authority
Conditional catch clauses
for..of loop