Can somebody help me in demystifying the following expression:
++[[]][+[]]+[+[]]
My Understanding
Going from left to right:
++[[]]: Not sure what this will evaluate to and how.
[+[]]: The +[] will be executed first and the unary operator will try to convert [] to number. Hence 0. So the output of [+[]] will be [0].
[+[]]+[+[]]: Which is equal to [0] + [0]. Here both the array's toString() method will be called and the output will be "00".
Basically I am not able to understand the left most expression i.e. ++[[]]
++[[]][+[]]+[+[]]
The expression will be broken into two as follows
++[[]][+[]] and [+[]]
Now [+[]] evaluates to [0] (As you already understand.)
Next consider ++[[]][+[]] equivalent to ++([[]][+[]]):
steps(process)
++[[]][0]
Now [[]] is an array containing a single array as its element. So [[]][0] evaluates to [] that is already allocated in memory.
Now as the 0-element array is already allocated in memory hence at the time of a mathematical operation it is converted into 0 and hence the memory location having the 0-element array when incremented using ++ operator the memory location gets the new value 1.
So ++[[]][+[]] finally evaluates to 1.
Now its 1+[0] i.e. 1+[0].toString() i.e. 1.toString()+"0" i.e. "1" + "0" i.e. 10.
[+[]] translates to [0]
++[[]][+[]] translates to 1
And 1 + [0] is equal to "10" in javascript
Related
Can anybody explain the solutions to this kata on codewars to me
The instructions are -
Write a function/proc/lambda called _ that always returns 5.
Sounds easy right? Just bear in mind that you can only use the following characters:
~!##$%^&*()-_+=[]{}|:;"'<,>.?/`
How will these solutions work
_=_=>-~-~-~-~-~[]
_=()=>+!""+!""+!""+!""+!""
And there are many other solutions but I am not understanding any of them.
All I understand is that a function named _ is defined. How the expressions, being returned evaluate is beyond me.
Thanks in advance!
_=()=>+!""+!""+!""+!""+!""
At first this sets up an arrow function named _ :
_=()=>
And if that is called it evaluates this:
!""
An empty string "" is falsy, its negation (!) is truthy so we end up at:
true + true + true + true + true
As adding booleans doesnt really work, they are converted to numbers first (false -> 0, true -> 1)
-~-~-~-~-~[]
That is slightly more complicated.
~[]
That calls the bitwise negation operator onto an empty array. Again, the empty array is converted to a number, by first converting it into a string ([] -> "") and then parsing that as a number ("" -> 0), its negation is the number 2 ^ 32 - 1 (where 32 bits are set). Now doing
~-
on that converts that into a negative number (-) and then swaps all bits again. This is repeated until we arrive at 101 in binary.
I was coding today and I made a mistake while declaring an Array of Arrays in javascript (using the literal notation), I had forgotten to place a comma between each element in the array. After some further tests I got:
[[0][0]] gave me [0]
[[1][2]] gave me [undefined]
[0][0] gave me 0
[3][3] gave me undefined
[3]3 gave me a SyntaxError: Unexpected number
[][] gave me SyntaxError: Unexpected token ]
[3]*3 gave me 9 (Number not inside an array)
[3,4]*3 gave me NaN
[3,3]*[3,3] gave me NaN
[3,3]*[[3,3]] gave me NaN
[3,3][3,3] gave me undefined
[3,3][[3,3]] gave me undefined
At first I thought that this behavior might be mathematical vector/matrix multiplication, but that does not seem to be the case.
So the no operator between each array is clearly different than adding a * operator, and the * operator itself does not seem to perform neither scalar multiplication nor matrix multiplication.
The minus and division signs seems to always yield NaN and the plus sign seems to call a toString on both arrays and concat the strings.
I found that to be very odd, what is the semantic meaning behind operations between two arrays? To me the thing that makes most sense is to either always give errors when declaring Array Array and to always give NaN when declaring Array _operator_ Array. But that is not the case at all. The + sign at least makes sense because Array inherits from Object and that also happens if you try new Date() + new Date() (and this automatic toString call might be useful sometimes, although I would not design the language this way).
the * operator itself does not seem to perform neither scalar multiplication nor matrix multiplication. The minus and division signs seems to always yield NaN.
Indeed. *, / and - only work on numbers, and they will cast their operands to numbers. The array [3,3] will in that process first be converted to the string "3,3, which is not a valid number, therefore NaN as the result. With [3]*3 it "works" because the array is casted to the number 3. Similarly, [3]-[1] would yield 2.
So the no operator between each array is clearly different than adding a * operator. I found that to be very odd, what is the semantic meaning behind operations between two arrays?
If you did place "no operator" between the arrays, the latter ones are no arrays any more. The first pair of […] does build an array literal, but all the following […] are property accessors in bracket notation. [0][0] just accesses the first item of the [0] array which happens to be 0.
That is why […][] is a syntax error - the bracket notation needs an expression for the property name.
What you did see with […][…,…] was the comma operator to delimit expressions, it is not an array literal but parsed as …[(…, …)]. Your [3,3][3,3] is equivalent to [3,3][3], and accessing the fourth item in the array [3,3] will yield undefined.
The + sign at least makes sense because Array inherits from Object and that also happens if you try new Date() + new Date() (and this automatic toString call might be useful sometimes, although I would not design the language this way).
Yes, the + operator is complicated in JS, as it deals with multiple different types and does either (numeric) addition or (string) concatenation.
This is even worse when you use it on objects. In that case, it is tried to be cast to a primitive value (string, number, boolean), and for that the [[DefaultValue]] algorithm is applied (with no hint). When both operands are identified to be numeric, the addition is performed - this can even happen to objects:
> 1 + {valueOf: function(){ return 2; }}
3
> 1 + {valueOf: function(){ return "2"; }}
"12"
This question already has answers here:
Why does ++[[]][+[]]+[+[]] return the string "10"?
(10 answers)
(![]+[])[+[]]... Explain why this works
(1 answer)
Closed 9 years ago.
While reading this article posted on dzone I found a snippet of JavaScript originally posted on Twitter by Marcus Lagergren.
The following code apparently prints the string "fail"
(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]];
This involves implicit type casting and I'm trying to understand how exactly this line is interpreted.
I've isolated each character
(![]+[])[+[]] prints "f"
(![]+[])[+!+[]] prints "a"
([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]] prints "i"
(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]] prints "l"
I've also managed to break down the expressions returning each letter apart from "i"
letter "f"
![] an empty array is an Object, which according to ECMAScript documentation, point 9.2 evaluates to true when converted to a boolean so this is false
false+[] as per Point 11.6.1 both arguments of the binary + operator get converted to String, therefore we get "false"+"", which evaluates "false"
+[] a unary plus operator causes a ToNumber conversion followed by a ToPrimitive conversion if the argument is an Object. The result of such conversion is determined by calling the [[DefaultValue]] internal method of the object. In case of an empty array, it defaults to 0.
(ECMAScript Documentation, sections: 11.4.6, 9.3, 9.1 )
"false"[0] we're accessing the character at index 0, hence the "f"
letter "a"
Same story, the only difference here are additional conversions in the part in square brackets (which evaluates to a number to point at another character in the string "false"), triggered by the use of unary + and ! operators.
+[] evaluates to 0, as explained above.
!0 evaluates to true as defined in Section 9.2 and Section 11.4.9. First, 0 is converted to a boolean false and then the operator inverts the value.
+true again, the unary plus triggers a ToNumber conversion, which returns a 1 for binary true
(Section 11.4.6 and 9.3)
"false"[1] returns the second character in the string, which is "a"
letter "l"
!+[] evaluates to true as explained above
true+true using the binary + on primitives triggers a ToNumber conversion. In case of true, its result is 1 and 1+1 equals 2
"false"[2] - self explanatory
letter "i"
What leaves me stumped is the letter "i". I can see that the second part (in square brackets) evaluates to the string "10" and that the first part (in parentheses) returns "falseundefined" but I can't make heads or tails of how this is happening. Could someone explain it step by step? Especially the magic that happens with square brackets? (arrays and array access)
If possible, I'd like each step to contain a link to the underlying ECMAScript rules.
What I find the most cryptic is this part: [][[]]
Your cryptic part isn't all that cryptic if you rewrite it a little:
[]['']
[] will be coerced into a string because it isn't an integer, so you're looking for a property of [] with the name '' (an empty string). You'll just get undefined, as there is no property with that name.
As for the actual letter, break the expression up into the two main components:
The string ([![]]+[][[]]):
[![]] is [false].
[][[]] is undefined.
Add them together and you get "falseundefined".
And the index: [+!+[]+[+[]]]. Some whitespace and parentheses will make the operations much clearer: [+(!(+[])) + [+[]]]:
[+[]] is [0].
+[] coerces [] to an integer, so you get 0.
!+[] coerces 0 to a boolean and negates it, so you get true.
+!+[] coerces true to an integer, so you get 1.
Add them together, and you get ["10"].
When using a string to access the properties of the array and the string happens to be an element of the array, the string is coerced into an integer and you get back the actual element of the array:
> [1, 2, 3]["0"]
1
> [1, 2, 3]["1"]
2
So your final result is:
> "falseundefined"["10"]
"i"
Read this answer for an explanation of the [false] + undefined part.
([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]] has two parts :
([![]]+[][[]]) and the other which you found yourself.
![] returns false. Then we use [...] to get the .toString() behavior of +.
([]+[] is the same as [].toString()+[].toString())
the [][[]] is undefined because we're trying to access the index [] (or [].toString(), which is '') of [] which is undefined.
Sorry for the previous answered, I misread your comment totally.
This question already has answers here:
Why does ++[[]][+[]]+[+[]] return the string "10"?
(10 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
I have recently seen an expression from a source, which looks something like below -
++[[]][+[]]+[+[]]
Entering this into the Chrome (Windows 7, Version 27.0.1453.94 m) console shows a result of "10".
Can someone explain what's happening here?
JSFiddle.
JavaScript is fairly flexible about converting between data types. The first thing to notice is that +[] evaluates to 0.* That lets us rewrite the expression as:
++[[]][0] + [0]
The next thing to notice is that ++[[]][0] is the preincrement operator applied to the first element of [[]]. Normally you can't apply ++ to an array, but JavaScript kindly converts the first element to 0, so the result is that ++[[]][0] evaluates to 1 (the first element of [[]] having now been incremented). It is kind of like this:
var a = [[]];
var b = ++a[0];
// now a will be [1] and b will be 1
That leaves us with:
1 + [0]
JavaScript now converts the int and the array to strings (since [0] is not a numeric value) and concatenates them together. Done!
* My understanding of how +[] becomes 0 is that it is a two-step process: first, [] is converted to a string primitive, which is the empty string. The empty string then converts to a number, which is zero. Via the same route, [1] evaluates to '1' and then to 1, [2] evaluates to 2, etc. However, [1, 2] evaluates to '1,2' which evaluates to NaN. (The last because the decimal point separator is ., not ,. I don't know what would happen if my locale were different.)
This expression stringifies valid Javascript constructs that yelds NaN, numbers, boolean undefined etc.
e.g.
+[] -> 0 //The unary plus operator is applied to the result of toString applied to an empty array (which is an empty string)
!+[] -> true
You can have a look also at this question,
and at the no alnum cheat sheets.
+[] is a number conversion from array to number which is 0.
and +[0] is also 0.
So the final result can be deduced to (++0) + [0] which is 1+[0].
And for a number adding an array. They are converted to string so the result is actually '10'.
You can log typeof(++[[]][+[]]+[+[]]) to verify.
when I run the javascript code below, I get the variable original as ending as
"1059823647undefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefined0"
why is this happening and how can i fix it?
original="012345678901234567890";
document.write("<textarea>");
document.write(original);
document.write("</textarea>"+"<br>");
/* scramble */
var scramble='1059823647';
scramble=scramble.split('');
var scrambled=new Array();
original=original.split('');
for(i=0;i<original.length;i++){
if(Math.round(Math.round(Math.floor(i/10)*10)+10)>=original.length){
scrambled[i]=original[i];
}else{
scrambled[i]=original[Math.round(Math.round(Math.floor(i/10)*10)+scramble[i%10])];
}
}
original='';
for(i=0;i<scrambled.length;i++){
original+=scrambled[i];
}
document.write("<textarea>");
document.write(original);
document.write("</textarea>"+"<br>");
undefined is being printed because your equation:
Math.round(Math.round(Math.floor(i/10)*10)+scramble[i%10])
is returning a number outside of the range of your array "original"
eg when i = 10, your equation returns 101.
I'm not entirely sure but i think what you mean to do is this:
(Math.floor(i/10)*10) + Number(scramble[i%10])
You're working with strings. But treating them like numbers. JavaScript will convert a string representation of a number to an actual number, but only when it needs to... And the + operator doesn't require such a conversion, as it acts as the concatenation operator for strings.
Therefore, this expression:
Math.round(Math.floor(i/10)*10)+scramble[i%10]
...is converting the first operand into a string and appending an element from the scramble array. You don't notice this for the first ten iterations, since when i<10 the first expression evaluates to 0... But after that, you're suddenly prefixing each scramble element with "10", and trying to access original indexes >= 100... of which there are none defined.
Solution:
Convert your strings to numbers before using them.
Math.round(Math.floor(i/10)*10)+ Number(scramble[i%10])