Develop Reference

What is the difference of callback and module exports?

There is an article I've seen about the callbacks in javascript. https://codeburst.io/javascript-what-the-heck-is-a-callback-aba4da2deced I know that I can understand it by reading the article. However, I'm getting confused of the callback while studying the module export in node.js
Callback - A callback is a function that is to be executed after another function has finished executing
Callback in javascript
function doHomework(subject, callback) {
console.log(`Starting my ${subject} homework.`);
callback();
}
doHomework('math', function() {
console.log('Finished my homework');
});
Module export in node.js
//app.js
const logger = require('./logger');
logger.log(10, 10);
//logger.js
const multiply = require('./multiplication');
function log(valueOne, valueTwo) {
multiply('The result is ', valueOne, valueTwo);
}
module.exports.log = log;
//
function multiply(speech, valueOne, valueTwo) {
let result = valueOne * valueTwo;
return console.log(speech + result);
}
module.exports = multiply;
and ran the node app.js on my terminal.
The result that I got from running the node app.js is The result is 100 and that is correct.
But my question is
Does the approach that I did on the node app is consider as callback as well?

Callback - A callback is a function that is to be executed after another function has finished executing
That's not a correct definition of "callback." Unless that definition had major caveats on it you didn't quote, I wouldn't continue to use whatever resource you got that from.
A fairly broad definition of a callback is:
A callback is a function you pass to something else (as a function argument, property value, etc.) that the other thing will call when its defined criteria for calling the function are met.
Some might argue for a narrower definition:
A callback is a function you pass to another function for that other function to call back when its defined criteria for doing so are met.
Examples of callbacks:
DOM event handlers, although we usually call them "handlers" rather than callbacks. (Broad definition.)
The function you pass to Array.prototype.sort to compare array elements. (Both the broad and narrower definitions.)
The function you pass to new Promise to start the asynchronous operation the promise will observe (called the "promise executor function"). (Both the broad and narrower definitions.)
The function you pass to Array.prototype.map to transform elements. (Both the broad and narrower definitions.)
The function you pass to a promise's then, catch, or finally method.
The function you pass to fs.openFile that Node.js will call when the file has been opened (or the operation has failed). (Both the broad and narrower definitions.)
...and many others.
Notice that many of those (2, 3, and 4) are called before the function calling them has finished executing.
Does the approach that I did on the node app is consider as callback as well?
No. Although you use multiply in log, it's just a function you call from log, not a callback. This would be a callback:
function multiply(a, b, cb) {
cb(a * b);
}
function showResult(msg) {
console.log(msg);
}
multiply(7, 6, showResult);
showResult is used as a callback when calling multiply.

I don't entirely understand your question. However, from what I gather, module.exports does not make a function a callback function explicitly. The purpose of module.exports is to allow access to that function when requiring the relevant .js file...as seen in your example.
Your log() function is a not a callback as you are simply passing in parameters and then using those values to call the multiply function and output the result.
When you call the multiply function you are simply calling it like so:
multiply('some text', 10, 10)
For this to be a callback it would have to take a function as it's final parameter, i.e.:
multiply('some text', 10, 10, function(err, data) {
// ...
})
This also goes for the log function, and any for that matter.
So, unless the final parameter of a function is a function, it is a not a callback. module.exports purely allows access to that function or the functions you specify in the object, for example:
module.exports = {
functionOne: someFunctionName,
functionTwo,
functionThree
}
If the name of the function is the same name as what you are trying to export you do not need to specify a value to the key.

JavaScript Get Function Instance with Arguments Passed In

Say I have the following code.
function myFunc(item) {
console.log(item);
}
function action() {
return myFunc("Hello World");
}
const myUncalledFunction = action;
myUncalledFunction(); // will console.log "Hello World"
Is there a way to make this code cleaner? I've looked into .apply() but it looks like that calls the function immediately as well.
The reason I'm wanting to do this is Chai's expect for throw requires you to pass in an uncalled function. But the function I'm wanting to test requires arguments to be passed in. So currently I just created a wrapper function that returns the function with the arguments passed in.
I feel like there has to be a better way to achieve this that is cleaner and simpler for someone looking at it.

Use .bind to bind arguments (and a calling context, if needed) to a function, which produces a new callable function in the process. Here, you can see this as basically allowing you to pass in arguments at one time, and then call the desired function with those arguments later:
function myFunc(item) {
console.log(item);
}
const myUncalledFunction = myFunc.bind(undefined, 'Hello World');
myUncalledFunction();
Or you might just use a concise arrow function
function myFunc(item) {
console.log(item);
}
const myUncalledFunction = () => myFunc('Hello World');
myUncalledFunction();

IndexedDB - Can't pass variable after onsuccess when opening database

I have been looking for assistance with setting up an IndexedDB for web storage, and I have run into a problem that I cannot find a good answer to. After I have successfully setup/opened the database I am having trouble passing the variable that contains the database information to access it later. Here is my code, I have been following a guide from MDN :
const DB_NAME = 'database-name';
const DB_VERSION = 2;
const DB_STORE_NAME = 'users';
var db;
function openDb() {
console.log('openDb ...')
var request = indexedDB.open(DB_NAME, DB_VERSION);
request.onsuccess = function(event) {
db = request.result;
console.log("openDb DONE");
};
request.onerror = function(event) {
console.log(request.errorCode);
};
request.onupgradeneeded = function(event) {
console.log('openDb.onupgradeneeded');
var store = event.currentTarget.result.createObjectStore(DB_STORE_NAME, { keyPath: 'id', autoIncrement: true });
store.createIndex('age', 'age', { unique: false });
};
}
function getObjectStore(store_name, mode) {
var tx = db.transaction(store_name, mode);
return tx.objectStore(store_name);
}
When getObjectStore is called the variable db is undefined. My knowledge of javascript is very limited and some concepts I don't get. The guide doesn't not show anything special being done and their demo works as is. Some other guides have mentioned implementing a callback, but they don't show how its done nor do I understand the concept of callbacks. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.

Unfortunately you need to learn about a relatively complicated concept usually referred to as asynchronous JavaScript before proceeding to use indexedDB. There are already several thousand questions related to AJAX on stackoverflow. I am trying to think of the most polite way to say this, but basically, the answer you are looking for is already provided by these other questions, and by many other websites. Nevertheless, here are some quick tips.
First, your approach is never going to work. You cannot skip over learning about async.
Second, do not use the setTimeout trick to get it to work. That is horrible advice.
Third, at a general level, a callback is simply a word used to describe a function when the function is used in a particular way. Specifically, a callback refers to a function that is passed as an argument to another function, where the other function then maybe calls the function at some later point in time. More specifically, a callback is generally a function that is called at the end of the function it is passed to, when the function has completed.
For example:
function a(b) { alert(b); }
function c(d) { d('hi'); }
c(a);
That might look a bit confusing at first but it is the simplest thing I can describe off the top of my head. In the example, the final line calls function c and passes in function a. The effect of the code is that you see 'hi' as a browser alert. In this example, the function a is passed as a parameter/argument to function c. Function c uses the name d for its one and only argument. c calls d with the string 'hi'. When describing this example, we would say that argument d represents a callback function passed to function c. We could also say that function a is the particular callback function used by function c. So that is basically it. When you pass a function in as an argument and the other function calls the passed in argument, you are using a callback.
Then things gets way more complicated, because you have to learn about how to read and write asynchronous code. Properly introducing it would take several pages. Here is an extreme crash course.
You have traditionally been writing synchronous code, even if you did not call it that. Synchronous code runs exactly when you expect it to, in the order that you write your statements. Here is a brief example of typical sync code:
function sum(a, b) { return a + b; }
alert(sum(1, 2));
Simple stuff. The next example is code that uses a callback, but is still synchronous.
function doOperation(op, num1, num2) { return op(num1, num2); }
function sumOperation(num1, num2) { return num1 + num2; }
var result = doOperation(sumOperation, 1, 2);
alert(result);
Here we passed the sumOperation function into the doOperation function. sumOperation is the callback function. It is the first argument with the name 'op'. Still pretty simple stuff. Now consider the next example. The point of the next example is to show how we pass control to the function to do something. Kind of like how goto/labels work.
function doOperation(op, num1, num2) {
var result = op(num1, num2);
alert(result);
return undefined;
}
function sumOperation(num1, num2) { return num1 + num2; }
doOperation(sumOperation, 1, 2);
Notice how doOperation no longer returns a value. It has the logic within its function body. So once we call doOp, the browser starts running the code inside doOperation. So we switched from the outer context into the body of the function. Also, because doOperation doesn't return anything, we cannot do anything with its return value. The logic is locked inside the body of the doOperation function. The code still works about the same, its just that now we are not returning anything from doOperation, and now the logic is inside doOperation instead of outside in the main/global context.
Now an example that uses setTimeout. This is completely unrelated to the suggestion of using setTimeout.
function doOperation(op, num1, num2) {
setTimeout(function runLater() {
var result = op(num1, num2);
alert(result);
return undefined;
}, 1000);
return undefined;
}
function sumOperation(num1, num2) { return num1 + num2; }
doOperation(sumOperation, 1, 2);
The point here is to understand that we use a callback (named runLater in this example), and that the code inside the callback does not run immediately. Therefore, we can no longer say it runs synchronously. We instead refer to the statements constituting the body of the callback function as asynchronous. So now an alert appears after 1 second. Notice how we cannot return anything from runLater. Also notice how we cannot return anything from doOperation. There is nothing to return. There is no way to get the value in the 'result' variable out of the scope of runLater. It is locked in there.
Let's try almost the same thing, but try to have runLater set a variable. Also, I am going to omit 'return undefined' because that is what every function without a explicit return statement returns.
var aGlobalResult = null;
function doOperation(op, num1, num2) {
setTimeout(function runLater() {
aGlobalResult = op(num1, num2);
}, 1000);
}
function sumOperation(num1, num2) { return num1 + num2; }
doOperation(sumOperation, 1, 2);
alert(aGlobalResult);
Hopefully you are catching on to the problem. First off, runLater does not return anything, so doOperation does not return anything, so we could not even try to do something like aGlobalResult = doOperation(...);, because that would not make any sense. Second, the result here is that you will see an alert 'undefined' because the alert statement executes prior to the statement that assigns a value to aGlobalResult. This is even though you wrote the assignment statement higher up (earlier) in the code, and the alert is later. This is the brick wall some newer developers run into right here. This is indeed confusing for some. aGlobalResult is undefined here because setTimeout does not set it until later. Even if we passed in 0 milliseconds to setTimeout, it is still 'later', meaning that the assignment happens at a later point in time, after the alert. The alert message is always going to be undefined. There is absolutely nothing you can do to avoid the way this works. Nothing. Period. Stop trying. Learn it, or give up entirely.
So, how does one typically write code that behaves or involves asynchronous stuff? By using callbacks. Which again means that you can no longer use return statements to assign values to outer scope variables. You instead want to write functions and pass around control to various functions. In other words, instead of:
function a() {}
function b() {}
function c() {}
a(); b(); c();
you write code like this:
function a(callback) {
var asdf = 1+2; // do some stuff in a
alert('a finished');
// a has now completed, call its callback function, appropriately named callback
callback();
}
function b(callback) {
var asdfasdfasdf = 3 + 4;
alert('b finished');
// call the callback
callback();
}
a( function(){ b(function() { alert('both a and b finished'); }); });
This is more formally known as continuation passing style, or CPS.
So, that is an example of the very basics of writing callback functions and basic asynchronous code. Now you can start to use indexedDB. The first thing you will notice is that the function indexedDB.open is documented as asynchronous. So, how can we use it? Like this:
var someGlobalVariable = null;
var openRequest = indexedDB.open(...);
openRequest.onsuccess = function openRequestOnSuccessCallbackFunction(event) {
// Get a reference to the database variable. If this function is ever called at some later
// point in time, the database variable is now defined as the 'result' property of the
// open request. There are multiple ways to access the result property. Any of the following
// lines works 100% the same way. Use whatever you prefer. It does not matter.
var databaseConnection = openRequest.result;
var databaseConnection = this.result;
var databaseConnection = event.target.result;
var databaseConnection = event.currentTarget.result;
// Now that we have a valid and defined databaseConnection variable, do something with it
// e.g.:
var transaction = databaseConnection.transaction(...);
var objectStore = transaction.objectStore(...);
// etc.
// DO NOT DO THE FOLLOWING, it does not work. Why? Review the early descriptions. First off
// this onsuccess callback function does not return anything. Second off this function gets
// called at some *later* point in time, who knows when. It could be a nanosecond later.
someGlobalVariable = databaseConnection;
};
Hopefully that sets you on the path.
Edit: I thought I would add a bit more of an intro. A related concept you need to learn that I did not explain clearly enough regarding control is the difference between imperative and declarative programming.
Imperative programming involves executing a series of statements in the order you wrote. You are the caller and are in control. Imperative code looks like this (fictional code):
var dbConn = dbFactory.newConnection('mydb');
var tx = dbConn.newTransaction();
var resultCode = tx.put(myObject);
if(resultCode == dbResultConstants.ERROR_PUT_KEY_EXISTS) {
alert('uhoh');
}
Declarative programming is subtly different. With a declarative approach, you write functions, and then you register (aka hook or bind) the functions to the JavaScript engine, and then at some point later, when it is appropriate, the engine runs your code. The engine is the caller and is in control, not you. Declarative programming involves callbacks and looks like this (fictional code):
dbFactory.newConnection(function onConnect(dbConn) {
dbConn.newTransaction(function onNewTransaction(tx) {
tx.put(myObject, function onPut(resultCode) {
if(resultCode == dbResultConstants.ERROR_PUT_KEY_EXISTS) {
alert('uhoh');
}
});
});
});
In this example, the only thing you called was the fictional dbFactory.newConnection function. You passed in a callback function. You did not call the callback function yourself. The engine calls the callback function. You cannot call the callback function yourself. This is kind of the whole idea behind why JavaScript engines can allow you to write asynchronous code. Because you don't get to control the order of execution of statements/functions. The engine gets to control it. All you get to do is write your functions, register them, and then start a chain of callbacks (the sole imperative line, the starting statement).
So this is why a function like getObjectStore in your question will not work. You are trying to call the function yourself, but that is backwards. You can only write a function and register it (somehow hook it up as a callback somewhere) and then the engine, not you, calls it at some later point in time.
Hopefully this is not more confusing, but you could actually write your function getObjectStore if you really wanted to by passing in the database variable to the function as its first argument. This leads to the logical next question, how to get a valid database variable to pass into the function. You cannot get one in a global context (reliably). Because the connection variable is only valid within the context of the onOpen callback function. So you would have to make your call to this function from within the onOpen function. Something like:
function getObjectStore(db, name, mode) {
var tx = db.transaction(name, mode);
var store = tx.objectStore(name);
return store;
}
var openRequest = indexedDB.open(...);
openRequest.onsuccess = function onOpen(event) {
// get the connection variable. it is defined within this (onOpen) function and open.
var db = this.result;
// call our simple imperative helper function to get the users store. only call it from
// within this onOpen function because that is the only place we can get the 'db' variable.
var usersStore = getObjectStore(db, 'users', 'readwrite');
// do something here with usersStore, inside this function only.
};

Javascript async function composition

I have several async functions with varying numbers of parameters, in each the last param is a callback. I wish to call these in order. For instance.
function getData(url, callback){
}
function parseData(data, callback){
}
By using this:
Function.prototype.then = function(f){
var ff = this;
return function(){ ff.apply(null, [].slice.call(arguments).concat(f)) }
}
it is possible to call these functions like this, and have the output print to console.log.
getData.then(parseData.then(console.log.bind(console)))('/mydata.json');
I've been trying to use this syntax instead, and cannot get the Then function correct. Any ideas?
getData.then(parseData).then(console.log.bind(console))('/mydata.json');

Implementing a function or library that allows you to chain methods like above is a non-trivial task and requires substantial effort. The main problem with the example above is the constant context changing - it is very difficult to manage the state of the call chain without memory leaks (i.e. saving a reference to all chained functions into a module-level variable -> GC will never free the functions from memory).
If you are interested in this kind of programming strategy I highly encourage you to use an existing, established and well-tested library, like Promise or q. I personally recommend the former as it attempts to behave as close as possible to ECMAScript 6's Promise specification.
For educational purposes, I recommend you take a look at how the Promise library works internally - I am quite sure you will learn a lot by inspecting its source code and playing around with it.

Robert Rossmann is right. But I'm willing to answer purely for academic purposes.
Let's simplify your code to:
Function.prototype.then = function (callback){
var inner = this;
return function (arg) { return inner(arg, callback); }
}
and:
function getData(url, callback) {
...
}
Let's analyze the types of each function:
getData is (string, function(argument, ...)) → null.
function(argument, function).then is (function(argument, ...)) → function(argument).
That's the core of the problem. When you do:
getData.then(function (argument) {}) it actually returns a function with the type function(argument). That's why .then can't be called onto it, because .then expects to be called onto a function(argument, function) type.
What you want to do, is wrap the callback function. (In the case of getData.then(parseData).then(f), you want to wrap parseData with f, not the result of getData.then(parseData).
Here's my solution:
Function.prototype.setCallback = function (c) { this.callback = c; }
Function.prototype.getCallback = function () { return this.callback; }
Function.prototype.then = function (f) {
var ff = this;
var outer = function () {
var callback = outer.getCallback();
return ff.apply(null, [].slice.call(arguments).concat(callback));
};
if (this.getCallback() === undefined) {
outer.setCallback(f);
} else {
outer.setCallback(ff.getCallback().then(f));
}
return outer;
}

This looks like an excellent use for the Promise object. Promises improve reusability of callback functions by providing a common interface to asynchronous computation. Instead of having each function accept a callback parameter, Promises allow you to encapsulate the asynchronous part of your function in a Promise object. Then you can use the Promise methods (Promise.all, Promise.prototype.then) to chain your asynchronous operations together. Here's how your example translates:
// Instead of accepting both a url and a callback, you accept just a url. Rather than
// thinking about a Promise as a function that returns data, you can think of it as
// data that hasn't loaded or doesn't exist yet (i.e., promised data).
function getData(url) {
return new Promise(function (resolve, reject) {
// Use resolve as the callback parameter.
});
}
function parseData(data) {
// Does parseData really need to be asynchronous? If not leave out the
// Promise and write this function synchronously.
return new Promise(function (resolve, reject) {
});
}
getData("someurl").then(parseData).then(function (data) {
console.log(data);
});
// or with a synchronous parseData
getData("someurl").then(function (data) {
console.log(parseData(data));
});
Also, I should note that Promises currently don't have excellent browser support. Luckily you're covered since there are plenty of polyfills such as this one that provide much of the same functionality as native Promises.
Edit:
Alternatively, instead of changing the Function.prototype, how about implementing a chain method that takes as input a list of asynchronous functions and a seed value and pipes that seed value through each async function:
function chainAsync(seed, functions, callback) {
if (functions.length === 0) callback(seed);
functions[0](seed, function (value) {
chainAsync(value, functions.slice(1), callback);
});
}
chainAsync("someurl", [getData, parseData], function (data) {
console.log(data);
});
Edit Again:
The solutions presented above are far from robust, if you want a more extensive solution check out something like https://github.com/caolan/async.

I had some thoughts about that problem and created the following code which kinda meets your requirements. Still - I know that this concept is far away from perfect. The reasons are commented in the code and below.
Function.prototype._thenify = {
queue:[],
then:function(nextOne){
// Push the item to the queue
this._thenify.queue.push(nextOne);
return this;
},
handOver:function(){
// hand over the data to the next function, calling it in the same context (so we dont loose the queue)
this._thenify.queue.shift().apply(this, arguments);
return this;
}
}
Function.prototype.then = function(){ return this._thenify.then.apply(this, arguments) };
Function.prototype.handOver = function(){ return this._thenify.handOver.apply(this, arguments) };
function getData(json){
// simulate asyncronous call
setTimeout(function(){ getData.handOver(json, 'params from getData'); }, 10);
// we cant call this.handOver() because a new context is created for every function-call
// That means you have to do it like this or bind the context of from getData to the function itself
// which means every time the function is called you have the same context
}
function parseData(){
// simulate asyncronous call
setTimeout(function(){ parseData.handOver('params from parseData'); }, 10);
// Here we can use this.handOver cause parseData is called in the context of getData
// for clarity-reasons I let it like that
}
getData
.then(function(){ console.log(arguments); this.handOver(); }) // see how we can use this here
.then(parseData)
.then(console.log)('/mydata.json'); // Here we actually starting the chain with the call of the function
// To call the chain in the getData-context (so you can always do this.handOver()) do it like that:
// getData
// .then(function(){ console.log(arguments); this.handOver(); })
// .then(parseData)
// .then(console.log).bind(getData)('/mydata.json');
Problems and Facts:
the complete chain is executed in the context of the first function
you have to use the function itself to call handOver at least with the first Element of the chain
if you create a new chain using the function you already used, it will conflict when it runs to the same time
it is possible to use a function twice in the chain (e.g. getData)
because of the shared conext you can set a property in one function and read it in one of the following functions
At least for the first Problem you could solve it with not calling the next function in the chain in the same context and instead give the queue as parameter to the next function. I will try this approach later. This maybe would solve the conflicts mentioned at point 3, too.
For the other problem you could use the sample Code in the comments
PS: When you run the snipped make sure your console is open to see the output
PPS: Every comment on this approach is welcome!

The problem is that then returns a wrapper for the current function and successive chained calls will wrap it again, instead of wrapping the previous callback. One way to achieve that is to use closures and overwrite then on each call:
Function.prototype.then = function(f){
var ff = this;
function wrapCallback(previousCallback, callback) {
var wrapper = function(){
previousCallback.apply(null, [].slice.call(arguments).concat(callback));
};
ff.then = wrapper.then = function(f) {
callback = wrapCallback(callback, f); //a new chained call, so wrap the callback
return ff;
}
return wrapper;
}
return ff = wrapCallback(this, f); //"replace" the original function with the wrapper and return that
}
/*
* Example
*/
function getData(json, callback){
setTimeout( function() { callback(json) }, 100);
}
function parseData(data, callback){
callback(data, 'Hello');
}
function doSomething(data, text, callback) {
callback(text);
}
function printData(data) {
console.log(data); //should print 'Hello'
}
getData
.then(parseData)
.then(doSomething)
.then(printData)('/mydata.json');

What to do when passing a parameter into a callback function conflicts with the callback's caller

I am using an ID3 reader script to retrieve data from audio files. The basic usage is:
ID3.loadTags(file,function()
{
var attr = ID3.getAllTags(file).attribute;
});
where the anonymous function is a callback function. This is just to provide context, however, I'm not at all sure the problem I'm having is specific to that particular script.
Typically, inside the callback function, you can extract the info you need and then use the DOM to set the innerHTML attribute of whatever element to equal the info you extracted.
Sometimes you're extracting a bunch of info and connecting all together in a long string though, and I'm trying to compartmentalize it a bit more so that my calling function will be a little cleaner. What I want to do is this:
function callingFunction()
{
var file = "whatever.mp3";
var info = getInfo(file);
}
function calledFunction(file)
{
var info = {data: 0};
ID3.loadTags(file, function(passedVar)
{
var dataobj = ID3.getAllTags(file);
passedVar.data = dataobj.title+etc+dataobj.album+....(it can get long);
}(info));
return info;
}
An object with an attribute is created because it's one of the only ways to simulate passing by reference in JS - pass the object into the callback function, assign the appropriate data to the attribute in the object, and then at the end of calledFunction, return the object to callingFunction.
It doesn't work though. Now, in that code above, if I said passedVar.data = "teststring" instead of assigning it data from dataobj, that would work, so the passing of the object into the callback function is working correctly. But if the object is assigned data from the data object that the ID3 function returns, it doesn't work. It comes back undefined, and furthermore, Chrome's JS debugger says that the object the ID3 function returns is null. This is further confirmed when I do this:
function calledFunction(file)
{
var info = {data: 0};
ID3.loadTags(file, function(passedVar)
{
alert(ID3.getAllTags(file).(any attribute));
}(info));
return info;
}
and no alert box comes up at all. But if remove the parameter being passed into the callback function in the code above, and leave everything else the same, that alert box comes up like it's supposed to.
So, to sum up, when I pass a parameter into the callback function, for some reason, another function of the object that's calling the callback function ceases to work correctly.
Is it possible that passing a parameter into the callback function is somehow conflicting with, or overriding, whatever the ID3.loadTags function is passing into the callback function, and that's why the getAllTags function is failing? Because for some reason when a parameter is passed into the callback function, the getAllTags function is no longer getting all of the information it needs to run properly? That's the only explanation I can think of.
If that's the case, is there a way to work around it? And if that's not what's going on, what is going on?
I have figured one solution, but I feel like it's hacky. I basically create a third function that gets called from the callback function(which itself receives no parameters), that takes as a parameter the object that the getAllTags method returns, extracts data from that object, and assigns it to global variables that other functions can access. So, this:
var globalVar;
function calledFunction(file)
{
//var info = {data: 0};
ID3.loadTags(file, function()
{
thirdFunction(ID3.getAllTags(file));
});
//return info;
}
function thirdFunction(dataobj)
{
globalVar = dataobj.title+etc;
}
But I don't really like that solution, I feel like it goes against the spirit of compartmentalization that I was after in the first place with this.
I'd appreciate any help.

The reason this doesn't work:
function calledFunction(file)
{
var info = {data: 0};
ID3.loadTags(file, function(passedVar)
{
var dataobj = ID3.getAllTags(file);
passedVar.data = dataobj.title+etc+dataobj.album+....(it can get long);
} (info));
// ^^^^^^ --- calls the function immediately
return info;
}
...is that you're calling your anonymous function and passing the result of that call (undefined) into ID3.loadTags. You're not passing a function into it anymore at all.
But the fundamental problem is that you're trying to use the data object before loadTags calls its callback and puts the data on the object.
I suggest that, since its output depends on an asynchronous operation, rather than relying on function return values, you change calledFunction to take a callback function. Here's what it should look like:
function callingFunction() {
getInfo('whatever.mp3', function(info) { // pass a callback function
// info.data is here now
});
}
function getInfo(file, cb) { // accept a callback function as the 2nd param
ID3.loadTags(file, function() {
var tags = ID3.getAllTags(file);
// once your async operation is done, call cb and pass back the return value
cb({
data: tags.title+etc+tags.album+....(it can get long);
});
});
}
This approach avoids problems you were trying to solve by using an object you could pass by reference, and it ensures you only move on once your asynchronous operation (ID3.getAllTags) is complete.