The combination of my methods of declaring an array, adding elements to the array and applying the method toString() does not work. Essentially I enter a certain number (between one and five) values to textvariables : fontVorto1, fontVorto2, fontVorto3 ……… in the html-part of the document.
When I decide on leaving the remaining textelements empty, I click on a button, to assign them to an array, by way of the following function:
function difinNombroFv () {
var fontVortoj = new array();
fontVortoj[0] = document.getElementsByName("fontVorto1")[0].value;
fontVortoj[1] = document.getElementsByName("fontVorto2")[0].value;
fontVortoj[2] = document.getElementsByName("fontVorto3")[0].value;
……………….
and put them together in a string:
x = fontVortoj.toString();
document.getElementsByName("fontVorto")[0].value = x;
(the extra variable x is not needed) to enable me sending them to the next document, where I want to unserialize them with
$fontVortoj = unserialize($_POST["fontVorto"]);
I tested the method toString() by insering an alert(x), but the result was that I got for x the value of "fontVorto1" only.
I met solutions with JSON, jQuery etc., but I never used those "languages", only HTML, JavaScript, PHP.
Will my Christmas day be spoiled because of this simple problem ;>)?
couple of things to note:
1. var fontVortoj = new array(); . here new array() is not correct. it should be:
var fontVortoj = new Array();
now if you call fontVortoj.toString(), then it will convert the array and return a string with array elements separated by comma.
you can rebuild the array from the string in php by using "explode" function.
you can rebuild the array from the string in javascript by using "split" function.
Apparently I misunderstood the question to begin with.
To serialize an astray, you can use .join()
By default, it will give you the values, joined by commas.
To deserialize, use .split()
If there's a chance that there might be commas in your values, choose a more elaborate string for joining:
var ar = ["a", "b"];
var serialized = ar.join("|"); // "a|b"
var deserialized = serialized.split("|"); //["a", "b"]
The string that you use for joining and splitting can be as long as you like.
If you want to be completely covered against any values, then you need to look at JSON.stringify() & JSON.parse(). But that had browser compatibility issues.
Related
I am puzzled as to why I can not store the word length in a javascript array.
I have tried
var i = [];
i["length"] = "ABC";
i["len"+"gth"] = "ABC";
but both aren't accepted in javascript. Can anyone explain it, and is there a way that I can store the word length in an array as above.
Since some asked for more detail. I am creating a list of words that I need to do a lookup at and find the value to display to the user. My list contains for example:
localVars.FunctionDic = [];
localVars.FunctionDic["lastindexof"] = "LastIndexOf(text, textToLocate)";
localVars.FunctionDic["specificindexof"] = "SpecificIndexOf(text, textToLocate, indexNumber)";
localVars.FunctionDic["empty"] = "Empty(text)";
localVars.FunctionDic["length"] = "Length(text)";
everything works except for the "length"
and I am using an array since I need to test if the word a user search for is in my array, and if it is display the value, if it is not, show nothing
It does not work because you are trying to write a string to a property that only allows a number.
From MDN: The length property of an object which is an instance of type Array sets or returns the number of elements in that array. The value is an unsigned, 32-bit integer that is always numerically greater than the highest index in the array.
With the limited details in your question it is hard to tell what you are actually trying to accomplish. It seems like you want to use an array like an object. If that is the case, use an object.
var i = {};
i["length"] = "ABC";
Based on the expected output, I believe you should be using an object not an array.
const FunctionDic = {
lastindexof: "LastIndexOf(text, textToLocate)",
specificindexof: "SpecificIndexOf(text, textToLocate, indexNumber)",
empty: "Empty(text)",
length: "Length(text)",
};
console.log(FunctionDic["lastindexof"]);
console.log(FunctionDic["specificindexof"]);
console.log(FunctionDic["empty"]);
console.log(FunctionDic["length"]);
To store the word length in an array you can do:
var i = ["length"]
If you want to store the length of a word in an array you can do:
var lengthOfHello = "hello".length
var i = [lengthOfHello]
var i = ["ABC"];
console.log(new Array(i[0].length).length);
I have a string which is name=noazet difficulty=easy and I want to produce the two words noazet and easy. How can I do this in JavaScript?
I tried var s = word.split("=");
but it doesn't give me what I want .
In this case, you can do it with that split:
var s = "name=noazet difficulty=easy";
var arr = s.split('=');
var name = arr[0]; //= "name"
var easy = arr[2]; //= "easy"
here, s.split('=') returns an array:
["name","noazet difficulty","easy"]
you can try following code:
word.split(' ').map(function(part){return part.split('=')[1];});
it will return an array of two elements, first of which is name ("noazet") and second is difficulty ("easy"):
["noazet", "easy"]
word.split("=") will give you an array of strings which are created by cutting the input along the "=" character, in your case:
results = [name,noazet,difficulty,easy]
if you want to access noazet and easy, these are indices 1 and 3, ie.
results[1] //which is "noazet"
(EDIT: if you have a space in your input, as it just appeared in your edit, then you need to split by an empty string first - " ")
Based on your data structure, I'd expect the desired data to be always available in the odd numbered indices - but first of all I'd advise using a different data representation. Where is this string word coming from, user input?
Just as an aside, a better idea than making an array out of your input might be to map it into an object. For example:
var s = "name=noazet difficulty=easy";
var obj = s.split(" ").reduce(function(c,n) {
var a = n.split("=");
c[a[0]] = a[1];
return c;
}, {});
This will give you an object that looks like this:
{
name: "noazert",
difficulty: "easy"
}
Which makes getting the right values really easy:
var difficulty = obj.difficulty; // or obj["difficulty"];
And this is more robust since you don't need to hard code array indexes or worry about what happens if you set an input string where the keys are reversed, for example:
var s = "difficulty=easy name=noazet";
Will produce an equivalent object, but would break your code if you hard coded array indexes.
You may be able to get away with splitting it twice: first on spaces, then on equals signs. This would be one way to do that:
function parsePairs(s) {
return s.split(' ').reduce(
function (dict, pair) {
var parts = pair.split('=');
dict[parts[0]] = parts.slice(1).join('=');
return dict;
},
{}
);
}
This gets you an object with keys equal to the first part of each pair (before the =), and values equal to the second part of each pair (after the =). If a string has multiple equal signs, only the first one is used to obtain the key; the rest become part of the value. For your example, it returns {"name":"noazet", "difficulty":"hard"}. From there, getting the values is easy.
The magic happens in the Array.prototype.reduce callback. We've used String.prototype.split to get each name=value pair already, so we split that on equal signs. The first string from the split becomes the key, and then we join the rest of the parts with an = sign. That way, everything after the first = gets included in the value; if we didn't do that, then an = in the value would get cut off, as would everything after it.
Depending on the browsers you need to support, you may have to polyfill Array.prototype.reduce, but polyfills for that are everywhere.
I thought I knew how to declare javascript arrays but in this script I am getting an infinite loop of undefined elements in the array.
I declare three arrays of numbers, two of which have multiple values and one which has a single value.
I have a switch statement that assigns one of the three arrays to a new variable name cluster_array
When I run a for loop through cluster_array, I get an infinite loop and every element if undefined
What am I missing?
<script type="text/javascript">
var ga_west_cluster = new Array(10,11,12,14,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,295,296);
// original bad array
var ga_east_cluster = new Array(84);
// added an extra (dummy) value and it works fine
var ga_east_cluster = new Array(1,84);
var sc_cluster = new Array(93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103);
</script>
Here is the alert text:
var test_message = "cluster data\n";
for(var k=0;k<cluster_array.length;k++)
test_message += "value: "+cluster_array[k]+"\n";
Don't initialize arrays like that. Always do this instead:
var myarray = [value, value, value, ... ];
The "Array()" constructor is terribly designed. The single-argument form, when the argument is a number, is interpreted as a request to "initialize" an array with that many "empty" values. It's a pointless thing to do, so in general you're much better off using the array constant notation (as in my example above).
It doesn't seem to happen anymore in modern browsers, but I'd swear that there was a time that at least some browsers would actually allocate memory for the single-argument constructor, which was not really useful but dangerous to code that might accidentally pass in a single very large number.
if I have a large javascript string array that has over 10,000 elements,
how do I quickly search through it?
Right now I have a javascript string array that stores the description of a job,
and I"m allowing the user to dynamic filter the returned list as they type into an input box.
So say I have an string array like so:
var descArr = {"flipping burgers", "pumping gas", "delivering mail"};
and the user wants to search for: "p"
How would I be able to search a string array that has 10000+ descriptions in it quickly?
Obviously I can't sort the description array since they're descriptions, so binary search is out. And since the user can search by "p" or "pi" or any combination of letters, this partial search means that I can't use associative arrays (i.e. searchDescArray["pumping gas"] )
to speed up the search.
Any ideas anyone?
As regular expression engines in actual browsers are going nuts in terms of speed, how about doing it that way? Instead of an array pass a gigantic string and separate the words with an identifer.
Example:
String "flipping burgers""pumping gas""delivering mail"
Regex: "([^"]*ping[^"]*)"
With the switch /g for global you get all the matches. Make sure the user does not search for your string separator.
You can even add an id into the string with something like:
String "11 flipping burgers""12 pumping gas""13 delivering mail"
Regex: "(\d+) ([^"]*ping[^"]*)"
Example: http://jsfiddle.net/RnabN/4/ (30000 strings, limit results to 100)
There's no way to speed up an initial array lookup without making some changes. You can speed up consequtive lookups by caching results and mapping them to patterns dynamically.
1.) Adjust your data format. This makes initial lookups somewhat speedier. Basically, you precache.
var data = {
a : ['Ant farm', 'Ant massage parlor'],
b : ['Bat farm', 'Bat massage parlor']
// etc
}
2.) Setup cache mechanics.
var searchFor = function(str, list, caseSensitive, reduce){
str = str.replace(/(?:^\s*|\s*$)/g, ''); // trim whitespace
var found = [];
var reg = new RegExp('^\\s?'+str, 'g' + caseSensitive ? '':'i');
var i = list.length;
while(i--){
if(reg.test(list[i])) found.push(list[i]);
reduce && list.splice(i, 1);
}
}
var lookUp = function(str, caseSensitive){
str = str.replace(/(?:^\s*|\s*$)/g, ''); // trim whitespace
if(data[str]) return cache[str];
var firstChar = caseSensitive ? str[0] : str[0].toLowerCase();
var list = data[firstChar];
if(!list) return (data[str] = []);
// we cache on data since it's already a caching object.
return (data[str] = searchFor(str, list, caseSensitive));
}
3.) Use the following script to create a precache object. I suggest you run this once and use JSON.stringify to create a static cache object. (or do this on the backend)
// we need lookUp function from above, this might take a while
var preCache = function(arr){
var chars = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz".split('');
var cache = {};
var i = chars.length;
while(i--){
// reduce is true, so we're destroying the original list here.
cache[chars[i]] = searchFor(chars[i], arr, false, true);
}
return cache;
}
Probably a bit more code then you expected, but optimalisation and performance doesn't come for free.
This may not be an answer for you, as I'm making some assumptions about your setup, but if you have server side code and a database, you'd be far better off making an AJAX call back to get the cut down list of results, and using a database to do the filtering (as they're very good at this sort of thing).
As well as the database benefit, you'd also benefit from not outputting this much data (10000 variables) to a web based front end - if you only return those you require, then you'll save a fair bit of bandwidth.
I can't reproduce the problem, I created a naive implementation, and most browsers do the search across 10000 15 char strings in a single digit number of milliseconds. I can't test in IE6, but I wouldn't believe it to more than 100 times slower than the fastest browsers, which would still be virtually instant.
Try it yourself: http://ebusiness.hopto.org/test/stacktest8.htm (Note that the creation time is not relevant to the issue, that is just there to get some data to work on.)
One thing you could do wrong is trying to render all results, that would be quite a huge job when the user has only entered a single letter, or a common letter combination.
I suggest trying a ready made JS function, for example the autocomplete from jQuery. It's fast and it has many options to configure.
Check out the jQuery autocomplete demo
Using a Set for large datasets (1M+) is around 3500 times faster than Array .includes()
You must use a Set if you want speed.
I just wrote a node script that needs to look up a string in a 1.3M array.
Using Array's .includes for 10K lookups:
39.27 seconds
Using Set .has for 10K lookups:
0.01084 seconds
Use a Set.
I have an array that contain some fields
like this
ctl00_ctl00_cphBody_bodycph_content_rdo_SID_25_SortOrder_17
ctl00_ctl00_cphBody_bodycph_content_rdo_SID_25_SortOrder_18
ctl00_ctl00_cphBody_bodycph_content_rdo_SID_25_SortOrder_19
I want to create a new array or manipulate this array to contain only
sid = {25,26,27}
from
_SID_25
_SID_26
_SID_27
where sid will be my array containing sid's extracted from above array
with pattern _SID_
I have to do this in jquery or javascript
use jquery map + regexp
var arr= ['tl00_ctl00_cphBody_bodycph_content_rdo_SID_25_SortOrder_17',
'ctl00_ctl00_cphBody_bodycph_content_rdo_SID_26_SortOrder_18',
'ctl00_ctl00_cphBody_bodycph_content_rdo_SID_27_SortOrder_19']
var out = $(arr).map(function(){
return this.match(/SID_(.*?)_/)[1];
});
out should be an array of the values..
(assuming all the values in the array do match the pattern)
I would use regex here
var sid = []
var matches = "ctl00_ctl00_cphBody_bodycph_content_rdo_SID_25_SortOrder_17".match(/_SID_(\d+)/);
if(matches) sid.push(parseInt(matches[1]));
This solution is totally reliant on the overall string form not changing too much, ie the number of "underscores" not changing which seems fragile, props given to commenter below but he had the index wrong. My original solution first split on "SID_" since that seemed more like a key that would always be present in the string going forward.
Given:
s = "ctl00_ctl00_cphBody_bodycph_content_rdo_SID_25344_SortOrder_17"
old solution:
array.push(parseInt(s.split("SID_")[1].split("_")[0]))
new solution
array.push(parseInt(s.split("_")[7])