Just trying to understand the exact difference in approaches of using ngView and ngInclude in AngularJS. When would is it correct to use one over the other? Thanks.
ngView works together with routing, and is mostly essential to an angular SPA. It's normally used to include the main content of your site, the bit in between the header and footer that changes every time a user clicks a link. Its integration with routing means changing the ngView content changes the controller too (depending on your configuration).
ngInclude is a general purpose include, you may not even need it. You'd sometimes use it inside a view to avoid repeating yourself, in the cases where several views need the same code included.
Related
I have a very common pattern that occurs, simplified it is along the lines of (pretend the all caps things are directives)
SOMESTUFF
BUTTONS
HEADER
<div ng-repeat="blah in data">
CONTENT
</div>
FOOTER
This is the same and repeated throughout the app, and will be repeated in subsequent apps. However, occasionally (particularly in the future) we will have a few pages where BUTTONS will be different but everything else the same. Or maybe CONTENT is different. Obviously, I could make each of these sections a directive and on each page put something like the above, however if I decide there needs to be MORESTUFF after FOOTER on every page I have to go through every page and add this.
Therefore, I feel the ideal setup would be one big directive, that contains each of the above smaller directives, and then be able to plug in other directives, so something along the lines of:
<BIGDIRECTIVE header="SPECIALHEADER">
And that would generate a big directive but with SPECIALHEADER in place of HEADER. Equally I could do
<BIGDIRECTIVE header="SPECIALHEADER" footer="SPECIALFOOTER">
Is this a good idea, or even possible? Does something like this exist or would I have to generate and compile the sub-directives on the fly?
I am trying to learn and understand the capabilities of UI-router with Angular 1.3.15.
I am trying to set up an application which has many views that have a header and footer directive. It also has a smaller number of views that do not need this setup, with the loaded view taking up the entire page.
Therefore, it seems I should handle this divergence "one level down", as in my diagram below. In the past, I have worked on ui-router apps with the index.html coded with the header/footer directives and a single ui-view for the other pages to load into. This time I am trying to get it correct form the start. Opinions and advice welcome.
I'm not sure what you want to know.
Yeah, you should handle the difference in templates the way you suggested: the root template should contain only the elements which appear on all states. Elements which appear on some states should go on those states templates, in the template of a parent state (if it makes sense), or in directives that you reuse in the various templates.
Instead of directives, you might want to use named views if your templates have some peatures in common, but the differences between them are not inside a single DOM element. For example, maybe all your pages have a small toolbar on top that always has some buttons, but other buttons depend on the state you are in. You can place that constant part of the toolbar in the root template, together with a <div ui-view="toolbar"></div>. The states would then define a view named toolbar with a template with the buttons they want to add.
You could make a directive for that toolbar with all the global buttons in its template and use <ng-transclude> to add the custom buttons at each state's template, but using named views seems cleaner.
I have tried many different approach but nothing is working as I expected. I've few css and javascript files, that I want to load along with partial associated to my Angular route. Is there any way I can do this? There were some solution around on the web, but nothing seems to work as per their instruction.
Our SPA has 2 distinctive top level views. To compare it is like windows file explorer showing tree view on one side and content details on other side. For these top level views, we are considering to have 2 partial views. Other alternative is to pack these views as directives. Our initial thoughts are going toward partial views, because these are quite larger blocks of functionalties and each view can have multiple controllers. Any experience/thoughts on similar lines would help us decide. Just a note we communicate between these views using eventing mechanism.
We do not intend to reuses these views. Specifically, are there any issues going partial views? Like performance, maintainability, etc.
I'm not sure I'm understanding the problem here, so sorry if I say something wrong (also sorry for my english).
What you need are 2 views; if 'inside' those views you use a directive or not, it's another thing.
The only thing I'm pretty sure is that those 2 views need to have they're own scope.
To me it seems a lot like a 'navigation menu' vs. 'view' kind of problem (only that the navigation part is gonna be some sort of tree-view), so the solution should be similar:
the 'normal' ngView (your 'details' side);
a div with it's own controller (and it's own scope).
Something like:
<nav ng-controller="treeViewController()">
<!-- here we use a directive, for example -->
<tree-view ng-model="tree"></tree-view>
</nav>
<div ng-view></div>
Then the best way to make them communicate is probably a custom service.
In case I misunderstood your problem, sorry in advance.
I am using a master page having navigation and ng-view on it, partial pages loading successfully under ng-view and with navigation of master page , but I require to load some isolated page like login.html page but not under ng-view and without master page content during route.
I am new on angular and not sure how to do this, login page loaded every time under ng-view.
Please suggest me any way to do this.
Thanks in advanced.
ng-include is your friend. see doc
here is simple way, but you should go to doc and see that there are extra options as to what can be done onload and if you want to autoscroll or do some kind of animation.
<div ng-include="'somefile.html'">
</div>
The one extra note is that ng-include is given an expression so if you have a static reference you need the extra quotes.
One of the great things about Angular is it is very flexible. Ultimately it will depend on your app and how you work. I'm not exactly certain what you are trying to accomplish but, it sounds like a job for the ngInclude directive as Dan mentioned.
You mention a login.html that excludes navigational and other main page content. Using a modal may be a viable alternative interface decision.
If you have everything built and you only want to hide part of the DOM and be done with it then, nghide or ngShow may be the quickest solution.
If there is a lot of stuff on your index.html you may want to separate those things into partials other than the ones connected directly to your routes, and use ng-include="'path/to/partial.html'" to include them. (The "''" are intentional as it likes a string.) Read the docs and experiment with the plunkr. You can do a lot of cool things with ngInclude, especially if you pay attention to its context.
If you combine the ngInclude directive with ng-switch-when, you could put together something like:
<div ng-switch="routeAction">
<div ng-switch-when="extpage" ng-include="'extraneous.content.html'"></div>
<div ng-switch-when="login" ng-include="'login.partial.html'"></div>
<div ng-switch-default ng-include="'default.tpl.html'"></div>
</div>
Where routeAction is tied to your controler which, is tied to your $route or $location.. depending on how you have things set up.