For frontend unit testing with jasmine i want to mock all my requests in my application.
I've already implemented a method to mock all my proxies.
proxy: appname.classes.proxy.ProxyNegotiator.getModelProxy("User")
and this method does something like this:
getModelProxy: function(config) {
var url = this.getUrl(config);
if (this.getProxyType() == 'api') {
return appname.classes.proxy.WebApiProxy.getModelProxy(url);
} else if (this.getProxyType() == 'test') {
return appname.classes.proxy.LocalTestProxy.getModelProxy(url);
}
return undefined;
}
so you can imagine depending on my ProxyType configuration i get the web api proxy or the local proxy for testing. I do now have covered my crud operations..
Still, i do have another issue to deal with..
I do have some other requests in my application like this (validation of the username):
//check if Username is Valid
Ext.Ajax.request({
url: '/api/User',
method: 'GET',
async: false,
params: { id: user.get('Id'), username: user.get('UserName') },
failure: function(response, opts) {
myErrors.push({
field: 'UserName',
message: appname.locale.ErrorInvalidUsername
});
}
});
I do have some troubles with mocking this Ext.Ajax.request things... I've already searched in the web and did not find any nice solution for this.
Whats best practice to mock this request? I am glad about every hint and/or idea u can give me. Please HELP!
All versions of Ext JS starting with 4.0.7 ship with the Ext.ux.ajax.SimManager class. It's not included in the base library builds, but the unminified source is found under examples/ux/ajax of your Ext JS folder.
To use it, you register a URL with a Simlet configuration that defines your return data.
Ext.onReady(function () {
Ext.ux.ajax.SimManager.init({
delay: 500 // Simulates network latency/server processing time
}).register({
'/api/User': {
stype: 'json', // stype is what kind of Simlet you want to use
data: [
// JSON response data, if needed
]
}
});
});
Then you make your Ajax requests like normal and the SimManager will re-route the request through the registered Simlet.
I would check out sinon js to do your ajax mocking. We are currently using it to write unit tests in our Ext heavy application. http://sinonjs.org/docs/#fakeServer
You should be able to test your ajax request using something like this:
{
setUp: function () {
this.server = sinon.fakeServer.create();
},
tearDown: function () {
this.server.restore();
},
"test user" : function () {
this.server.respondWith("GET", "/api/User,
[500, { "Content-Type": "application/json" },
'[{ "id": 12, "comment": "Hey there" }]']);
Ext.Ajax.request({
url: '/api/User',
method: 'GET',
async: false,
params: { id: user.get('Id'), username: user.get('UserName') },
failure: function(response, opts) {
myErrors.push({
field: 'UserName',
message: appname.locale.ErrorInvalidUsername
});
}
});
this.server.respond();
//assert myErrors
}
}
Related
I am currently using angular-hateoas (https://github.com/jmarquis/angular-hateoas). I would like to add specific interceptors to the query() and get() functions of the resource created in HateoasInterface. I have been looking for ways to do it, but not been successful.
I thought it could be done by adding it like this:
var someResource = someService.resource('someresource');
someResource.query.interceptors = {
response: function (data) {
// do something data
return data
},
responseError: function (error) {
// do something with error
return $q.reject(error);
}
};
but that gives me:
TypeError: Attempted to assign to readonly property.
I might need to use $decorator, but I have no experience with that, and I have seen no example for adding specific interceptors to specific resource objects.
I don't really want to use $httpProvider.interceptors, since I don't want the interceptor to work on all resources.
The only thing I can currently think of, is configuring HateoasInterfaceProvider with specificly named functions that contain the specific interceptors.
angular.module('myModule')
.config(HateoasInterfaceConfig);
HateoasInterfaceConfig.$inject = ['HateoasInterfaceProvider'];
function HateoasInterfaceConfig(HateoasInterfaceProvider) {
HateoasInterfaceProvider.setHttpMethods({
get: {
method: 'GET',
isArray: false
},
getSomeResource: {
method: 'GET',
isArray: false,
interceptors: {
response: someResponseFunc,
responseError: someErrorFunc
}
},
update: {
method: 'POST',
},
query: {
method: 'GET',
isArray: true
}
querySomeResource: {
method: 'GET',
isArray: true,
interceptors: {
response: function(data) {
// do something with data
return data;
},
responseError: function (error) {
//do something with error
return $q.reject(error);
}
}
});
HateoasInterfaceProvider.setLinksKey('_links');
}
but I prefer not to do it like that.
Figured it out.
When calling a resource, params and actions can be passed.
So like:
someServiceResult.resource('someresource',{},{get: {method: 'GET',...,
interceptor: { response: responseInterceptorFunc, ...}}})
Still not really the preferred solution, but when wrapped in a function in a service, acceptible.
I would like to have a solution that allows changing the interceptor definition for the Resource object created with:
someServiceResult.resource('someresource')
but I currently don't have time for figuring that out.
Here is what my Ajax post looks like:
$.ajax({
type: "POST",
url: "/create",
data: {
"question": $('#question').val(),
"options": options
},
success: function() { window.location.href="/view"; }
});
Fairly simple. options is an array of string charachters. The problem is, when I receive on the server end with Hapijs, the request payload shows this object received:
{
question: "..etc..",
"options[]": [..etc...]
}
Why does it add a [] to the options variable name? Normally this wouldn't be a problem for me, but when I do the same thing and simulate a server request in my lab test like this:
var test = [..etc..]
// Simulate POST request
var serverOptions = {
method: 'POST',
url: '/create',
payload: {
question: 'Question',
options: test
}
};
It shows that the variable name received is just "options", not "options[]". How can I get jquery to stop adding the [] to the variable name when POSTing? Thanks
Note: I have limited exp with js so correct me if my I'm completely wrong in how I'm describing this scenario.
I have two javascript files. I am calling a function on the first file (client side) which calls a function on the second file and uses the callback from the second file's function for the purposes of response.success/.error on the first file.
If that doesn't make sense here is some code:
Note: this is being done temporarily using Parse's cloud functions. Let me know if more information is needed regarding those but not sure if it's important.
First file:
Parse.Cloud.define("methodName", function(request, response) {
...
secondFile.myFunction(param1, {
stuff: request.params.stuff,
}, function (err, res) {
if (err) {
response.error(err);
} else {
response.success(res);// I'm assuming this is going to the hardcoded "yes." from httpRequest on second file's function
}
});
});
Second File:
myFunction: function(param1, properties, callback) {
if (!param1) return callback(new Error("Helpful error message"));
var headersForReq = {
...
};
var bodyForReq = ...; // the properties properly parsed
Parse.Cloud.httpRequest({
method: 'PUT',
url: ...,
headers: headersForReq,
body: bodyForReq,
success: function (httpResponse) {
callback(null, 'yes'); // the hardcoded "yes" i referred to
},
error: function (httpResponse) {
callback(httpResponse.status + httpResponse.error);
}
});
}
On my the client, the code is treated as a success (errors aren't thrown or returned back) but when I print out the value it comes across as (null) not "yes".
What's going on here? (Side note, httpRequest is currently not doing anything, its hard to verify if the request is properly being sent because it's being sent to a third party API).
I do know the second file's method is properly being called though. So it's not a silly issue with the module.exports or var secondFile = require('\path\secondFile')
I think you are just mis-use the api
Rewrite it with the example style.
https://parse.com/docs/js/api/classes/Parse.Cloud.html#methods_httpRequest
Parse.Cloud.httpRequest({
method: 'PUT',
url: ...,
headers: headersForReq,
body: bodyForReq
}).then(function (httpResponse) {
callback(null, 'yes'); // the hardcoded "yes" i referred to
},
function (httpResponse) {
callback(httpResponse.status + httpResponse.error);
}
});
I think below will work, too.
Parse.Cloud.httpRequest({
method: 'PUT',
url: ...,
headers: headersForReq,
body: bodyForReq
}, {
success: function (httpResponse) {
callback(null, 'yes'); // the hardcoded "yes" i referred to
},
error: function (httpResponse) {
callback(httpResponse.status + httpResponse.error);
}
});
BTW, if you are using open source parse-server, you can use request or request-promise. These 2 npm package is used by many people. (Parse.Promise is not es6-like promise)
I need to write a script inside of datorama.com to access pardot.com. Pardot does have an API that requires a request that has a request inside the body as
POST: https://pi.pardot.com/api/login/version/3
message body: email=&password=&user_key=
Right now here is my code:
phantom.casperPath = casperPath;
phantom.injectJs(casperPath + "/bin/bootstrap.js");
var casper = require('casper').create({
verbose: true,
logLevel: 'debug'
});
casper.start().thenOpen('https://pi.pardot.com/api/login/version/3',{
method: 'post',
content: {
'text' : 'email=<myemail>&password=<password>&user_key=<userKey>'
}
}, function(response) {
this.echo(this.getHTML());
});
casper.run();
I can tell that it is getting through to the server because it is responding this.echo(this.getHTML()); "Login Failed" . I am using the right email/password/user_Key because i am pulling that from the API Console for pardot and it is working there.... So I believe the issue is I am not setting the body of the request correctly.
So does anyone know a way to set the body on the request?
casper.open() or casper.thenOpen() don't understand the content setting. You probably wanted to use data:
casper.start()
.thenOpen('https://pi.pardot.com/api/login/version/3', {
method: 'post',
data: 'email=<myemail>&password=<password>&user_key=<userKey>'
}, function() { ... });
Don't forget to use encodeURIComponent() on the email, password and user key parameters if you build the string yourself.
You can also pass an object:
casper.start()
.thenOpen('https://pi.pardot.com/api/login/version/3', {
method: 'post',
data: {
email: '<myemail>',
password: '<password>',
user_key: '<userKey>'
}
}, function() { ... });
If you expect something else than HTML from the API, then you should use casper.getPageContent() instead of casper.getHTML().
i am leveraging CamFind's API for image recognition in my windows phone 8 app. On their site they have given an example for how to use the API with Node.js.. however i am writing a PhoneGap Windows Phone app and dont have this availble.
I would like to use just plain jquery/javascript to use this API.
Here's the example provided on their site:
var Request = unirest.post("https://camfind.p.mashape.com/image_requests")
.headers({
"X-Mashape-Authorization": "Z**********************"
})
.send({
"image_request[locale]": "en_US",
"image_request[language]": "en",
"image_request[device_id]": "<image_request[device_id]>",
"image_request[latitude]": "35.8714220766008",
"image_request[longitude]": "14.3583203002251",
"image_request[altitude]": "27.912109375",
"focus[x]": "480",
"focus[y]": "640",
"image_request[image]": "/tmp/file.path"
})
.end(function (response) {
console.log(response);
});
Here's how i am trying to do the same using jquery/ 'plain' javascript
$.ajax({
url: 'https://camfind.p.mashape.com/image_requests', // The URL to the API. You can get this by clicking on "Show CURL example" from an API profile
type: 'POST', // The HTTP Method
data: {
"image_request[locale]": "en_US",
"image_request[language]": "en",
"image_request[device_id]": "<image_request[device_id]>",
"image_request[latitude]": "35.8714220766008",
"image_request[longitude]": "14.3583203002251",
"image_request[altitude]": "27.912109375",
"focus[x]": "480",
"focus[y]": "640",
"image_request[image]": "http://exelens.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/bmw-car-2013.jpg"
}, // Additional parameters here
datatype: 'json',
success: function(data) { alert(JSON.stringify(data)); },
error: function(err) { alert(err); },
beforeSend: function(xhr) {
xhr.setRequestHeader("X-Mashape-Authorization", "Z**********************");
}
});
Issue/Question:
When i do it through javascript/jquery - it seems to be complaining about missing image_request[image] attribute. It never hits the success block.
Am i doing something wrong in terms of how i transformed the Node.js API request example (1st block of code above) provided by CamFind VS. how i am doing trying to consumer the API through plain through Javascript (2nd block of code above)?
Thanks!!
Fyi, references i am using:
Consume an API in javacstipt: https://www.mashape.com/imagesearcher/camfind#!endpoint-1-Image-Request
CamFind API usage: https://www.mashape.com/imagesearcher/camfind#!endpoint-1-Image-Request
I know this is an old question but having stumbled across it whilst trying to solve it myself I thought I should answer it for the future.
The issue is this line:
"image_request[image]": "http://exelens.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/bmw-car-2013.jpg"
It should be:
"image_request[remote_image_url]": "http://exelens.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/bmw-car-2013.jpg"
So the complete code is:
$.ajax({
url: 'https://camfind.p.mashape.com/image_requests', // The URL to the API. You can get this by clicking on "Show CURL example" from an API profile
type: 'POST', // The HTTP Method
data: {
"image_request[locale]": "en_US",
"image_request[language]": "en",
"image_request[device_id]": "<image_request[device_id]>",
"image_request[latitude]": "35.8714220766008",
"image_request[longitude]": "14.3583203002251",
"image_request[altitude]": "27.912109375",
"focus[x]": "480",
"focus[y]": "640",
"image_request[remote_image_url]": "http://exelens.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/bmw-car-2013.jpg"
}, // Additional parameters here
datatype: 'json',
success: function(data) { nowDoSomethingFun(data); },
error: function(err) { alert(err); },
beforeSend: function(xhr) {
xhr.setRequestHeader("X-Mashape-Key", "YOURKEY")
}
});
}
I am not familiar with this API but you might try formatting your data parameter like this:
data: {
image_request: {
locale: 'en_US',
language: 'en',
device_id: '<image_request[device_id]>',
latitude: '35.8714220766008',
longitude: '14.3583203002251',
altitude: '27.912109375',
image: 'http://exelens.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/bmw-car-2013.jpg'
},
focus: {
x: '480',
y: '640'
}
}