angular.module('app.services', []).service("test", function($http, $rootScope){
this.test=function(){
$rootScope.name="test1";
};
};
angular.module('app.controllers', []).controller('TestController', function ($scope, test) {
test.send();
})
I dont get an error but the changes don't get applied to the UI. I tried $scope.apply() and got an error.
We need to tell Angular which modules your module depends on, In our case the main module is app.controllers.
To call service from different model we need tell to controller where is our service:
['app.services']
JS
var appServices = angular.module('app.services', []);
var appCtrl = angular.module('app.controllers', ['app.services']);
appServices
.service("test", function ($http, $rootScope) {
this.send = function () {
$rootScope.name = "test1";
};
});
appCtrl.controller('TestController', function ($scope, test) {
test.send();
});
Demo Fiddle
I think you should change ".service" by ".factory".
As I can see in the creating services docs there are 3 ways of creating custom services. One of then is using factory way, as the following:
var myModule = angular.module('myModule', []);
myModule.factory('serviceId', function() {
var shinyNewServiceInstance;
//factory function body that constructs shinyNewServiceInstance
return shinyNewServiceInstance;
});
Hope to help.
Related
I am using requireJS for my angularjs app.
common.service.js
define(function () {
var coreModule = angular.module('coreModule');
coreModule.config(['$provide', function ($provide) {
$provide.factory("CommonService", CommonService);
}]);
CommonService.$inject = ["$http", "$q", "$window"];
function CommonService($http, $q, $window) {
var service = {};
service.sharedValue;
return service;
}
});
page1.controller.js
define(function () {
var coreModule = angular.module('coreModule');
coreModule.controller('Page1Controller', ['$scope', "CommonService", function ($scope, CommonService) {
// Q2: common service
$scope.commonService = CommonService;
}]);
});
Now When I am running my app, it throws me below error:
Error: [$injector:unpr] Unknown provider: CommonServiceProvider <- CommonService <- Page1Controller
any inputs?
Your core module should have empty dependencies injected
var coreModule = angular.module('coreModule',[]);
Also in page1. controller you dont have to declare the module again, you can just use
angular.module('coreModule')
.controller('Page1Controller', ['$scope', "CommonService", function ($scope, CommonService) {
Define config
Define the service
Define the controller, inject the service, use the dependency in function declaration etc. As you would know, both are needed, after all you need the those handles, else what's the point in injecting.
Define a module, define module dependencies. NOTE that the service has to be defined before controller. If you reverse the order, you will get an error, probably that's what is happening here. Without full code, I can't tell.
bootstrap angular.
Finally working plunkr: http://plnkr.co/edit/CE9enkgW3KASx8pf5vdb?p=preview
define('config',[],function(){
function config($routeProvider) {
$routeProvider.when('/home', {templateUrl: 'tpl.home.html', controller: 'HomeController'})
.otherwise({redirectTo: '/home'});
}
config.$inject=['$routeProvider'];
return config;
});
define('dataSvc',[], function(app){
function factoryFunc ($q, $timeout){
var svc = {getData: getData};
return svc;
function getData() {
console.log('executing function');
var d = $q.defer();
$timeout(function(){
console.log("firing timeout");
d.resolve({name:"test", data:[1, 2, 3, 4]});
}, 750);
return d.promise;
}
}
factoryFunc.$inject=['$q', '$timeout'];
return factoryFunc;
});
define('HomeController',[], function() {
function HomeController($scope, dataSvc) {
$scope.name = "Mahesh";
dataSvc.getData().then(function(result){
$scope.data=result;
console.log($scope.data);
});
}
HomeController.$inject=['$scope','dataSvc'];
return HomeController;
});
define('coreModule', ['config', 'dataSvc', 'HomeController']
, function(config, dataSvc, HomeController){
var app = angular.module('app', ['ngRoute','ngResource']);
app.config(config);
app.factory('dataSvc',dataSvc);
app.controller('HomeController', HomeController);
});
require(['coreModule'],
function() {
angular.bootstrap(document, ['app']);
}
);
Refer also,
https://www.sitepoint.com/using-requirejs-angularjs-applications/
http://beletsky.net/2013/11/using-angular-dot-js-with-require-dot-js.html
I'm trying to separate components into several files for a simple application but angular's dependency injector is giving me headaches and I don't really know what is expected.
Unknown provider: servicesProvider <- services <- maincontroller
Is the error I'm getting.
app.js
//Application definition with injected dependencies
var app = angular.module('leadcapacity', ['services', 'utils', 'customfilters', 'controllers']);
services.js
var services = angular.module('services', []);
services.service('xrmservice',
[
'$http', function($http) {
var oDataUrl = Xrm.Page.context.getClientUrl() + '/XRMServices/2011/OrganizationData.svc/';
var service = {};
service.query = function(entitySet, query) {
return $http.get(oDataUrl + entitySet + '?' + query);
};
return service;
}
]);
controllers.js
var ctrls = angular.module('controllers', ['utils', 'services']);
ctrls.controller('maincontroller',
function ($scope, services, utils) {
};
});
And the include order in index.html
<script src="service.js"></script>
<script src="controllers.js"></script>
<script src="app.js"></script>
Looks fine to me. I know this is perhaps not the best way to organize things, but getting a "Hello world" first would be nice.
Thanks.
Error message appearing in console clearly says that, services
dependency isn't exists in the module.
You have injected incorrect service name in maincontroller controller factory function, basically you were trying to to inject services(module name) instead of xrmservice(service name)
function ($scope, services, utils) {
should be
function ($scope, xrmservice, utils) {
Additional
Do follow Inline Array annotation of DI, as you were already used the same in your xrmservice service JS file, so that in future you don't need to go back and change that when you face javascript minification related issues.
Controller
ctrls.controller('maincontroller', [ '$scope', 'xrmservice', 'utils',
function ($scope, xrmservice, utils) {
//code goes here
//....
};
}]);
Although you have injected them into the module, you need to give them to the function so you can use the injected modules
ctrls.controller('maincontroller',
['$scope', 'services', 'utils', function ($scope, services, utils) {
};
}]);
I have an angular project that I'm breaking out into a better file structure but I'm getting Argument 'fn' is not a function, got undefined for an error when creating a new service. Any ideas what I'm doing wrong?
app.js
angular.module('app', [
'app.controllers'
]);
angular.module('app.controllers', ['leaflet-directive', 'app.services']);
angular.module('app.services', []);
main.controller.js
angular.module('app.controllers')
.controller('MainCtrl', MainCtrl);
function MainCtrl($scope, $window, leafletData, DataService) {
var main = this;
main.items = DataService.GetItems();
//Other controller stuff
};
data.service.js
angular.module("app.services")
.factory('DataService', DataService);
var DataService = function(){
return data = {
getItems: function(){
return [//data here];
}
};
}
Your declaration of DataService is the problem. You're declaring it after you're using it. You should change your declaration of DataService to function DataService() instead of setting it to a var to take advantage of function hoisting
I am new to Angular and I am creating my first app right now. I have a factory in place and my controller should be pulling in data from my source, however I keep on getting this error. My factory is called SpreadsheetFactory.
I have the code for my controller below. Any help is appreciated, thanks!
(function () {
angular
.module('beerApp')
.controller('appController', appController, ['$scope', 'SpreadsheetFactory']);
function appController($scope, SpreadsheetFactory) {
SpreadsheetFactory.getData().then( function (data) {
console.log(data)
});
// $scope.brews = [];
return data;
}
})();
This line is wrong:
.controller('appController', appController, ['$scope', 'SpreadsheetFactory']);
It should be:
.controller('appController', ['$scope', 'SpreadsheetFactory', appController]);
I have three controllers that are quite similar. I want to have a controller which these three extend and share its functions.
Perhaps you don't extend a controller but it is possible to extend a controller or make a single controller a mixin of multiple controllers.
module.controller('CtrlImplAdvanced', ['$scope', '$controller', function ($scope, $controller) {
// Initialize the super class and extend it.
angular.extend(this, $controller('CtrlImpl', {$scope: $scope}));
… Additional extensions to create a mixin.
}]);
When the parent controller is created the logic contained within it is also executed.
See $controller() for for more information about but only the $scope value needs to be passed. All other values will be injected normally.
#mwarren, your concern is taken care of auto-magically by Angular dependency injection. All you need is to inject $scope, although you could override the other injected values if desired.
Take the following example:
(function(angular) {
var module = angular.module('stackoverflow.example',[]);
module.controller('simpleController', function($scope, $document) {
this.getOrigin = function() {
return $document[0].location.origin;
};
});
module.controller('complexController', function($scope, $controller) {
angular.extend(this, $controller('simpleController', {$scope: $scope}));
});
})(angular);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/angular.js/1.3.15/angular.js"></script>
<div ng-app="stackoverflow.example">
<div ng-controller="complexController as C">
<span><b>Origin from Controller:</b> {{C.getOrigin()}}</span>
</div>
</div>
Although $document is not passed into 'simpleController' when it is created by 'complexController' $document is injected for us.
For inheritance you can use standard JavaScript inheritance patterns.
Here is a demo which uses $injector
function Parent($scope) {
$scope.name = 'Human';
$scope.clickParent = function() {
$scope.name = 'Clicked from base controller';
}
}
function Child($scope, $injector) {
$injector.invoke(Parent, this, {$scope: $scope});
$scope.name = 'Human Child';
$scope.clickChild = function(){
$scope.clickParent();
}
}
Child.prototype = Object.create(Parent.prototype);
In case you use the controllerAs syntax (which I highly recommend), it is even easier to use the classical inheritance pattern:
function BaseCtrl() {
this.name = 'foobar';
}
BaseCtrl.prototype.parentMethod = function () {
//body
};
function ChildCtrl() {
BaseCtrl.call(this);
this.name = 'baz';
}
ChildCtrl.prototype = Object.create(BaseCtrl.prototype);
ChildCtrl.prototype.childMethod = function () {
this.parentMethod();
//body
};
app.controller('BaseCtrl', BaseCtrl);
app.controller('ChildCtrl', ChildCtrl);
Another way could be to create just "abstract" constructor function which will be your base controller:
function BaseController() {
this.click = function () {
//some actions here
};
}
module.controller('ChildCtrl', ['$scope', function ($scope) {
BaseController.call($scope);
$scope.anotherClick = function () {
//other actions
};
}]);
Blog post on this topic
Well, I'm not exactly sure what you want to achieve, but usually Services are the way to go.
You can also use the Scope inheritance characteristics of Angular to share code between controllers:
<body ng-controller="ParentCtrl">
<div ng-controller="FirstChildCtrl"></div>
<div ng-controller="SecondChildCtrl"></div>
</body>
function ParentCtrl($scope) {
$scope.fx = function() {
alert("Hello World");
});
}
function FirstChildCtrl($scope) {
// $scope.fx() is available here
}
function SecondChildCtrl($scope) {
// $scope.fx() is available here
}
You don't extend controllers. If they perform the same basic functions then those functions need to be moved to a service. That service can be injected into your controllers.
Yet another good solution taken from this article:
// base controller containing common functions for add/edit controllers
module.controller('Diary.BaseAddEditController', function ($scope, SomeService) {
$scope.diaryEntry = {};
$scope.saveDiaryEntry = function () {
SomeService.SaveDiaryEntry($scope.diaryEntry);
};
// add any other shared functionality here.
}])
module.controller('Diary.AddDiaryController', function ($scope, $controller) {
// instantiate base controller
$controller('Diary.BaseAddEditController', { $scope: $scope });
}])
module.controller('Diary.EditDiaryController', function ($scope, $routeParams, DiaryService, $controller) {
// instantiate base controller
$controller('Diary.BaseAddEditController', { $scope: $scope });
DiaryService.GetDiaryEntry($routeParams.id).success(function (data) {
$scope.diaryEntry = data;
});
}]);
You can create a service and inherit its behaviour in any controller just by injecting it.
app.service("reusableCode", function() {
var reusableCode = {};
reusableCode.commonMethod = function() {
alert('Hello, World!');
};
return reusableCode;
});
Then in your controller that you want to extend from the above reusableCode service:
app.controller('MainCtrl', function($scope, reusableCode) {
angular.extend($scope, reusableCode);
// now you can access all the properties of reusableCode in this $scope
$scope.commonMethod()
});
DEMO PLUNKER: http://plnkr.co/edit/EQtj6I0X08xprE8D0n5b?p=preview
You can try something like this (have not tested):
function baseController(callback){
return function($scope){
$scope.baseMethod = function(){
console.log('base method');
}
callback.apply(this, arguments);
}
}
app.controller('childController', baseController(function(){
}));
You can extend with a services, factories or providers. they are the same but with different degree of flexibility.
here an example using factory : http://jsfiddle.net/aaaflyvw/6KVtj/2/
angular.module('myApp',[])
.factory('myFactory', function() {
var myFactory = {
save: function () {
// saving ...
},
store: function () {
// storing ...
}
};
return myFactory;
})
.controller('myController', function($scope, myFactory) {
$scope.myFactory = myFactory;
myFactory.save(); // here you can use the save function
});
And here you can use the store function also:
<div ng-controller="myController">
<input ng-blur="myFactory.store()" />
</div>
You can directly use $controller('ParentController', {$scope:$scope})
Example
module.controller('Parent', ['$scope', function ($scope) {
//code
}])
module.controller('CtrlImplAdvanced', ['$scope', '$controller', function ($scope, $controller) {
//extend parent controller
$controller('CtrlImpl', {$scope: $scope});
}]);
You can use Angular "as" syntax combined with plain JavaScript inheritance
See more details here
http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/oric/2015/01/01/base-controller-angularjs/
I wrote a function to do this:
function extendController(baseController, extension) {
return [
'$scope', '$injector',
function($scope, $injector) {
$injector.invoke(baseController, this, { $scope: $scope });
$injector.invoke(extension, this, { $scope: $scope });
}
]
}
You can use it like this:
function() {
var BaseController = [
'$scope', '$http', // etc.
function($scope, $http, // etc.
$scope.myFunction = function() {
//
}
// etc.
}
];
app.controller('myController',
extendController(BaseController,
['$scope', '$filter', // etc.
function($scope, $filter /* etc. */)
$scope.myOtherFunction = function() {
//
}
// etc.
}]
)
);
}();
Pros:
You don't have to register the base controller.
None of the controllers need to know about the $controller or $injector services.
It works well with angular's array injection syntax - which is essential if your javascript is going to be minified.
You can easily add extra injectable services to the base controller, without also having to remember to add them to, and pass them through from, all of your child controllers.
Cons:
The base controller has to be defined as a variable, which risks polluting the global scope. I've avoided this in my usage example by wrapping everything in an anonymous self-executing function, but this does mean that all of the child controllers have to be declared in the same file.
This pattern works well for controllers which are instantiated directly from your html, but isn't so good for controllers that you create from your code via the $controller() service, because it's dependence on the injector prevents you from directly injecting extra, non-service parameters from your calling code.
I consider extending controllers as bad-practice. Rather put your shared logic into a service. Extended objects in javascript tend to get rather complex. If you want to use inheritance, I would recommend typescript. Still, thin controllers are better way to go in my point of view.