This line in my JS file:
RedQueryBuilderFactory.create(config,
'SELECT "x0"."title", "x0"."priority" FROM "ticket" "x0" WHERE ("x0"."status" = (?))',
[]
);
works fine witih an empty array as the 3rd parameter. This parameter is supposed to be an array of strings according to the documentation and any sample code I can find. When I pass a string in the array it fails:
RedQueryBuilderFactory.create(config,
'SELECT "x0"."title", "x0"."priority" FROM "ticket" "x0" WHERE ("x0"."status" = (?))',
['in_process']
);
I get java.lang.ClassCastException in the Safari console. Here's the related part of the config if it's relevant:
var config = {
meta : {
tables : [ {
"name" : "ticket",
"label" : "Ticket",
"columns" : [ {
"name" : "title",
"label" : "Title",
"type" : "STRING",
"size" : 255
}, {
"name" : "priority",
"label" : "Priority",
"type" : "REF"
} ],
fks : []
} ],
types : [ {
"name" : "REF",
"editor" : "SELECT",
"operators" : [ {
"name" : "IN",
"label" : "any of",
"cardinality" : "MULTI"
}]
} ]
}
};
Looks like this is a bug in passing in parameter values. Internally it is expecting a collection but this is not happening.
Best if you raise a https://github.com/salk31/RedQueryBuilder bug report here?
NB Should be "IN" not "="
Related
hello i need help with array , as you can see my data
{
"age" : "18",
"altKategoriler" : [ "Dramalar" ],
"category" : [ "Aksiyon", "Heyecanlı", "Gerilim" ],
"id" : 5240718100,
"img" : "https://i.ibb.co/k8wx5C8/AAAABW9-ZJQOg-MRljz-Zwe30-JZw-Hf4vq-ERHq6-HMva5-ODHln-Ci-OEV6ir-Rcjt88tcnm-QGQCKpr-K9h-Oll-Ln-Sbb-EI.jpg",
"izlenilmeSayisi" : 0,
"logo" : "https://i.ibb.co/Rb2SrcB/AAAABfcrhh-Rni-Ok-Ct2l-Rys-ZYk-Oi-T0-XTeagkrw-Mkm-U0h-Lr-WIQZHEHg-VXihf-OWCwz-Vv-Qd7u-Ffn-DFZEX2-Ob.webp",
"oyuncuKadrosu" : [ "Diego Luna", "Michael Pena", "Scoot McNairy", "Tenoch Huerta", "Joaquin Cosio" ],
"senarist" : [ "Doug Miro" ],
"time" : "3 Sezon",
"title" : "Narcos: Mexico",
"type" : "Dizi",
"videoDescription" : "Guadalajara Karteli'nin yükselişinin gerçek öyküsünü anlatan bu yeni ve cesur Narcos hikâyesinde, Meksika'daki uyuşturucu savaşının 1980'lerdeki doğuşuna tanıklık edin.",
"videoQuality" : "HD",
"videosrc" : "https://tr.vid.web.acsta.net/uk/medias/nmedia/90/18/10/18/19/19550785_hd_013.mp4",
"year" : "2021",
"yonetmen" : [ "Carlo Bernard", "Chris Brancato" ]
}
I can access elements such as id , title or logo because they are not arrays.
How can I loop through the data inside the array since there is an array in the category in yield?
var data = this.database.filter((item) => item.type == searchType)
var data = this.database.filter((item) => item.category == searchCategory)
It's okay because my type value doesn't have an array.
But when I enter my category value, it only gets the first index[0]. It does not look at other indexes.
in summary,
item.category[0] , item.category[1] , item.category[2]...........
How can I get index browsing like
if your data looks like this :
let data ={
"age" : "18",
"altKategoriler" : [ "Dramalar" ],
"category" : [ "Aksiyon", "Heyecanlı", "Gerilim" ],
"id" : 5240718100,
"img" : "https://i.ibb.co/k8wx5C8/AAAABW9-ZJQOg-MRljz-Zwe30-JZw-Hf4vq-ERHq6-HMva5-ODHln-Ci-OEV6ir-Rcjt88tcnm-QGQCKpr-K9h-Oll-Ln-Sbb-EI.jpg",
"izlenilmeSayisi" : 0,
"logo" : "https://i.ibb.co/Rb2SrcB/AAAABfcrhh-Rni-Ok-Ct2l-Rys-ZYk-Oi-T0-XTeagkrw-Mkm-U0h-Lr-WIQZHEHg-VXihf-OWCwz-Vv-Qd7u-Ffn-DFZEX2-Ob.webp",
"oyuncuKadrosu" : [ "Diego Luna", "Michael Pena", "Scoot McNairy", "Tenoch Huerta", "Joaquin Cosio" ],
"senarist" : [ "Doug Miro" ],
"time" : "3 Sezon",
"title" : "Narcos: Mexico",
"type" : "Dizi",
"videoDescription" : "Guadalajara Karteli'nin yükselişinin gerçek öyküsünü anlatan bu yeni ve cesur Narcos hikâyesinde, Meksika'daki uyuşturucu savaşının 1980'lerdeki doğuşuna tanıklık edin.",
"videoQuality" : "HD",
"videosrc" : "https://tr.vid.web.acsta.net/uk/medias/nmedia/90/18/10/18/19/19550785_hd_013.mp4",
"year" : "2021",
"yonetmen" : [ "Carlo Bernard", "Chris Brancato" ]
}
and if we have array of data you can do something like this :
myArray.filter(item=>item.category.indexOf(searchCategory)>=0)
but if you want to explore in object rather than array you can do this :
data.category.indexOf(searchCategory)>=0
You could make this a bit generic, by testing whether the targeted field is an array, using Array.isArray, and then call a filter on each element, and see if any is positive (using .some()). The filter can be function that is provided, so that it can perform a simple match, or apply a regular expression, or anything else.
Instead of testing with Array.isArray you could skip that step and check whether the value has a .some() method. If so, calling it will give the desired outcome, and otherwise (using the .? and ?? operators), the filter should be applied to the value as a whole:
Here is how that looks:
function applyFilter(data, field, filter) {
return data.filter(item => item[field]?.some(filter) ?? filter(item));
}
// Example use:
var data = [{
"category" : [ "Action", "Thriller", "Horror"],
"type" : "Series",
}, {
"category" : [ "Historical", "Romance" ],
"type" : "Theatre",
}];
// Find entries that have a category that looks like "roman*":
var result = applyFilter(data, "category", value => /^roman.*/i.test(value));
console.log(result);
If you are running on an older version of JavaScript, and don't have support for .? or ??, then use:
return data.filter(item => Array.isArray(item[field])
? item[field].some(filter)
: filter(item));
I am new to javascript.
I would like to check whether the specific nested property is present or not in an array of items, ex)
[{
"_id" : ObjectId("5c4ec057e21b840001968d31"),
"status" : "ACTIVE",
"customerId" : "sample-book",
"bookInfo" : {
"bookChunks" : [
{
"key" : "Name",
"value" : "test"
},
{
"key" : "Surname1",
"value" : "testtt"
},
{
"key" : "user-contact",
"value" : "sample-value",
"ContactList" : {
"id" : "sample-id",
"timeStamp" : "Tue, 20 Sep 2016 07:49:25 +0000",
"contacts" : [
{
"id" : "contact-id1",
"name" : "Max Muller",
"phone_number" : "+XXXXXXX"
},
{
"id" : "contact-id2",
"name" : "Max Muller",
"phone_number" : "+XXXXXXX"
}
]
}
}
]
}
},
{
"_id" : ObjectId("5c4ec057e21b840001968d32"),
"status" : "ACTIVE",
"customerId" : "sample-book1",
"bookInfo" : {
"bookChunks" : [
{
"key" : "Name",
"value" : "test"
},
{
"key" : "Surname1",
"value" : "testtt"
}
]
}
}]
Here, I would like to find whether any item has ContactList or contacts present. If it is present take the item and put it in a separate list.
I am using ember-lodash. Using normal javascript or lodash would be fine for me. Any help will be really appreciated.
You could use filter and some. This returns all the objects which have at least one object with ContactList property inside bookInfo.bookChunks array.
const input=[{"_id":"5c4ec057e21b840001968d31","status":"ACTIVE","customerId":"sample-book","bookInfo":{"bookChunks":[{"key":"Name","value":"test"},{"key":"Surname1","value":"testtt"},{"key":"user-contact","value":"sample-value","ContactList":{"id":"sample-id","timeStamp":"Tue, 20 Sep 2016 07:49:25 +0000","contacts":[{"id":"contact-id1","name":"Max Muller","phone_number":"+XXXXXXX"},{"id":"contact-id2","name":"Max Muller","phone_number":"+XXXXXXX"}]}}]}},{"_id":"5c4ec057e21b840001968d32","status":"ACTIVE","customerId":"sample-book1","bookInfo":{"bookChunks":[{"key":"Name","value":"test"},{"key":"Surname1","value":"testtt"}]}}]
const output = input.filter(o =>
o.bookInfo.bookChunks.some(c => "ContactList" in c)
)
console.log(output)
If you just want to check if any of the objects have ContactList, you could replace filter with another some
(Note: This assumes that bookInfo.bookChunks will not be undefined. Otherwise you'd have to add a undefined check before using the nested property)
My collection looks like this:
> db.projects_columns.find()
{ "_id" : "5b28866a13311e44a82e4b8d", "checkbox" : true }
{ "_id" : "5b28866a13311e44a82e4b8e", "field" : "_id", "title" : "ID", "sortable" : true }
{ "_id" : "5b28866a13311e44a82e4b8f", "field" : "Project", "title" : "Project", "editable" : { "title" : "Project", "placeholder" : "Project" } }
{ "_id" : "5b28866a13311e44a82e4b90", "field" : "Owner", "title" : "Owner", "editable" : { "title" : "Owner", "placeholder" : "Owner" } }
{ "_id" : "5b28866a13311e44a82e4b91", "field" : "Name #1", "title" : "Name #1", "editable" : { "title" : "Name #1", "placeholder" : "Name #1" } }
{ "_id" : "5b28866a13311e44a82e4b92", "field" : "Name #2", "title" : "Name #2", "editable" : { "title" : "Name #2", "placeholder" : "Name #2" } }
{ "_id" : "5b28866a13311e44a82e4b93", "field" : "Status", "title" : "Status", "editable" : { "title" : "Status", "type" : "select", "source" : [ { "value" : "", "text" : "Not Selected" }, { "value" : "Not Started", "text" : "Not Started" }, { "value" : "WIP", "text" : "WIP" }, { "value" : "Completed", "text" : "Completed" } ], "display" : "function (value, sourceData) { var colors = { 0: 'Gray', 1: '#E67C73', 2: '#F6B86B', 3: '#57BB8A' }; var status_ele = $.grep(sourceData, function(ele){ return ele.value == value; }); $(this).text(status_ele[0].text).css('color', colors[value]); }", "showbuttons" : false } }
You can see that in the very last document that I have stored a function as text.Now the idea is that I will request this data and will be in an Javascript Array format.
But I want to be able to have my function without the quotes! You can see that simply evaluating it will not work because I need to have it still needs to be inside of the object ready to be executed when the array is used.
How can I achieve this?
Thanks for any help!
There are two possible solutions, but neither particularly safe and you should strongly consider why you need to store functions as strings in the first place. That being said, you could do two things.
The simplest is to use eval. To do so, you would have to first parse the object like normal, and then set the property that you want to the result of eval-ing the function string, like so:
// Pass in whatever JSON you want to parse
var myObject = JSON.parse(myJSONString);
// Converts the string to a function
myObject.display = eval("(" + myObject.display + ")");
// Call the function with whatever parameters you want
myObject.display(param1, param2);
The additional parentheses are to make sure that evaluation works correctly. Note, that this is not considered safe by Mozilla and there is an explicit recommendation not to use eval.
The second option is to use the Function constructor. To do so, you would need to restructure your data so that you store the parameters separately, so you could do something like this:
var myObject = JSON.parse(myJSONString);
// displayParam1 and displayParam2 are the stored names of your parameters for the function
myObject.display = Function(myObject.displayParam1, myObject.displayParam2, myObject.display)
This method definitely takes more modification, so if you want to use your existing structure, I recommend eval. However, again, make sure that this is absolutely necessary because both are considered unsafe since outside actors could basically inject code into your server.
I have a mongo document like so:
{
"_id" : "EimL8Hf5SsCQKM7WP",
"enable" : "no",
"collector" : [
{
"name" : "prod",
"enable" : "no",
"transport" : {
"address" : {},
"port" : "8000",
"protocol" : "http-secure"
},
"authentication" : {},
"notify-syslog" : "yes"
},
{
"name" : "test",
"enable" : "no",
"transport" : {
"address" : {},
"port" : "8000",
"protocol" : "http-secure"
},
"authentication" : {},
"notify-syslog" : "yes"
}
],
"misc" : {
"createdBy" : "someuser",
"updatedBy" : "someuser",
}
}
I display certain fields of the mongo document as an autoform to the user so that they can be edited. Since the other fields are hidden, the outcome of the form will only contain the fields that were exposed.
I end up with a modified document object like so: (keep an eye on the "name" fields)
{
"enable" : "no",
"collector" : [
{
"name" : "someohername",
},
{
"name" : "anothername",
}
],
"misc" : {
"createdBy" : "someuser",
"updatedBy" : "anotheruser",
}
}
My current requirement is to somehow merge both the documents together such that the initial document has all fields of the modified document, along with it's fields.
Outcome:
{
"_id" : "EimL8Hf5SsCQKM7WP",
"enable" : "no",
"collector" : [
{
"name" : "someothername",
"enable" : "no",
"transport" : {
"address" : {},
"port" : "8000",
"protocol" : "http-secure"
},
"authentication" : {},
"notify-syslog" : "yes"
},
{
"name" : "anothername",
"enable" : "no",
"transport" : {
"address" : {},
"port" : "8000",
"protocol" : "http-secure"
},
"authentication" : {},
"notify-syslog" : "yes"
}
],
"misc" : {
"createdBy" : "someuser",
"updatedBy" : "anotheruser",
}
}
If you notice above, only the name field has been updated whilst retaining the remaining fields.
I tried to directly update the document using collection.update({id}, $set:{<<modified_docuemnt}}); but it is replacing the entire collector field with what is passed in the $set
How exactly do I go about this? It does not matter if I'm doing the changes directly in mongodb or as a JSON object using javascript.
I want to limit my query's result to a set of fields. This is one of my documents:
{
"_id" : "WA9QRuiWtGsr4amtT",
"status" : 3,
"data" : [
{
"name" : "0",
"value" : "Text ..."
},
{
"name" : "1",
"value" : "12345678"
},
{
"name" : "2",
"value" : "Text"
},
{
"name" : "4",
"value" : "2"
},
{
"name" : "8",
"value" : true
},
{
"name" : "26",
"value" : true
},
],
"userId" : "7ouEumtudgC2HX4fF",
"updatedAt" : NumberLong(1415903962863)
}
I want to limit the output to the status field as well a the first and third data document.
This is what I tried:
Meteor.publish('cases', function () {
var fields = {
currentStatus: 1,
'data.0': 1,
'data.2': 1
};
return Cases.find({}, { fields: fields });
});
Sadly it doesn't work. Something else I found is $elemMatch but it only returns the first element:
data: {
$elemMatch: {
name: {
$in: ['0', '2']
}
}
},
How can I limit the output to these fields?
To display status and data(unlimited) fields try
cases.find({}, {"status":1, "data":1})
This is simple query, to limit "data" output you will need to work harder :)
Get 1 element by data.name (not by position):
cases.find({}, {status:1, "data": {$elemMatch:{name:"0"}}})
Get 1 element by data.name, but from a list of values:
cases.find({}, {status:1, "data": {$elemMatch:{name:{$in:["0", "1"]}}}})
To get close to your question, you may try redact. That is new in Mongodb 2.6.
Or play with $unwind and .aggregate() in previous editions.
So far, I do not see a way to return array elements based on a position.