my friend has designed my webpage for me, but has now gone on holiday and i only know the very basics. I want to reduce the width of my buttons on one of my pages.
I think this is the part of the coding (where it says (".betbutton) i need to change but just don't know how - hope somebody can help me - thanks
$(".betbutton").click(function(){
$("#numberofbets").html(this.attributes["nob"].value);
bet = this.attributes["bet"].value;
This is the problem with how it actually looks on my site and need the size to reduce so the buttons all shift to the left.
http://freebetoffersonline.com/bet-calc.php
Instead of giving you a fish I will teach you to fish.
First use Firefox and then install the Firebug extension. Restart Firefox.
Once you have restarted there should be a Firebug menu, open it.
Once Firebug is open click on the blue arrow icon and that will let you choose the element inspector.
Then use the element inspector to inspect the "button" elements.
Firebug has a "style" tab on the right, it will show you the styles, including the width from various CSS classes. It will also show you where the CSS style sheet is located.
Even nicer, you can CHANGE the styles including the width to test and see if the changes you think may work will actually do what you think they will.
When you look at the buttons with Chrome's Web Inspector you see that they have a dynamic width. The container, which has class name .bidlist has a fixed width of 880px. Change it to ~560px and you should be fine :-)
I'm not really sure which buttons you want to change the size of, so this answer will be rather generic.
You need to use CSS. Inside the HTML for your button put style="width:100px;" or whatever width you want. If there is already a style attribute in the button's HTML, just add the width:100px; to the style.
In style.css, line 797, there is the .bidlist width property. Reduce that to something like 580px and see them shrink :)
Your friend made the buttons 25% of the width of the bidlist container, so there would be 4 fitting in each row. If you reduce the parent container's width, they shrink, too. In the style.css file, the design of all the elements are implemented, including the container width. So that is the part you change, not somewhere in the HTML (markup).
Related
I've created a small javascript Rich Text Editor, but when I open it in an iframe, the padding of certain objects are not correct. Here's an image of what it looks like from the source:
But, when I put it in the iframe and use this source, it looks like this:
I tried changing the DOCTYPE and changing the margin: and padding: to 0px, but nothing changed. I can't seem to fix this. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
As far as I can see, what's happening is that the iframe's width is not enough. From the source the colorpicker box can fill all the space it needs, but in the iframe it's cramped, shrinking everything inside it and making the color bands at the end and the gray 16, 32, 64 fall to another row. Also, the offset for the colorpicker seems to be off; are you using percentage-widths and offsets, maybe? You can do many things to solve this: just increase the width of the iframe (you can't make the box only spill out of the iframe), move the colorpicker box to the left, make the picker's size fixed (you'll need to resize the iframe or make it scrolling for this, etc. It's probably not a DOCTYPE problem, though. More details would be appreciated, but I hope this helps!
Ok. I figured out what I needed to do. I had the colorpicker div set to be at a specific .offset() with jQuery, but it didn't fully function in the iframe. The reason was because the div's width was variant on the color bit function. Because of this, jQuery had trouble determining the left positioning of the colorpicker div since the offset function I wrote uses the width of the div. So, all I needed to do was set the width of the colorpicker. ;) Thanks for the help!
is it possible to have a visible html element but one which lacks presence on the page?
Let me give you an example of what I mean. Lets say I have a picture gallery and a light box. Usually lightboxes grey out the background so you can focus on the image. All i want is the greyed out overlay but i dont want it to be interactive. So if you were to click on it, you would click on the element behind it. So lets say I have a paragraph and in that paragraph i have a link and covering the paragraph is a overlay at 50% opacity, if i were to hover over the link, the link would react asif the overlay was not there.
I hope I have explained this well enough
AFAIK there is no easy way to do this and the only alternative would be to get the mouse coordinates and relay them somehow :/ is ther anyway what I want is possible?
Thanks
This can be done with pointer-events: none in certain browsers, but unfortunately not any version of IE.
It is not possible to have an overlay be transparent in the sense you want it to be. What you could try to do is the opposite; put the 'overlay' layer behind the rest of your page and then change the opacity of your entire page to 50%. Visually this will not make any difference, but it will remove the bubbly effect of JS clicking.
You can take an element out of the document flow with CSS but when that happens the element still receives click events as long as it is visible.
You could probably attach a click event to the overlay and then use the mouse coordinates with document.elementFromPoint or by manually looping through all the elements you want to be interactive and checking their coordinates on the page. The problem with this approach is that NoScript or a number of other products might detect this as ClickJacking, which it essentially is even though you are using it for a benign purpose.
I don't see why this isn't possible. opacity is about 5 css properties for cross-browser. I am not sure what exactly you mean by an overlay (same thing as a layer or z-index?) or are you talking about the possibility of using a css
for all p tags, then it's p:hover in css, but for a specific p tag, then you use an #id with :hover pseudo-class like this:
#myptag:hover {
background-color: #f3c9d5;
background-image:url(/images/mybgimg.jpg);
color:blue;
cursor:pointer;
}
for opacity, use a number in windows.index from 0 to 100:
//this function modifies the opacity of an element at a
//specific id like el1 or el2 using imageNumber as the index.
//you also specify an opacityInteger, which is an non-negative
//integer number in the range 0..100
//works on chrome, safari, ie, and firefox, all the major browsers.
function processimage(imageNumber, opacityInteger) {
var opacityFloat=opacityInteger/100.0;
//set image style, if we can - I hear it's readonly...
//filter:alpha(opacity=100);-moz-opacity:1.0;opacity:1.0
document.getElementById("el"+imageNumber).style.filter="alpha(opacity="+opacityInteger+")";
document.getElementById("el"+imageNumber).style.mozOpacity=opacityFloat.toString();
document.getElementById("el"+imageNumber).style.opacity=opacityFloat.toString();
}
well, I just realized this is only marginally helpful. while it may get your toward your goal, you may still have to set a css z-index:1; on a layerto get an actual overlay. what I just gave you was an UNDERLAY or simply setting a given p tag's color or background image to another thing. I don't know if that's desirable to you or not. I have found overlays to be extremely difficult to manage, because the page layout engine treats all the layers as if they were the same layer tags-flow-wise and you have to use absolute positioning to force them to stick in a position you want them in. plus it messes up your main page using layers.
My example here,
Shows an image in the center of CSS3 generated columns. I need the text in the column to the right of the image to wrap around the image so that it doesn't appear in front of the image. This to my understanding is not doable in current css.
Does someone have a NON-OBTRUSIVE way of achieving what I am looking for?
I'd love to achieve this look here,
without the title and misc stuff located in the top left of course. The idea would be to allow the adding of images anywhere in the markup and have it look correctly.
I dont care about browser support at this time, so - any solution is great!
Thanks in advance....
Erik
Without doing JavaScript hacks, I don’t believe there is any pure CSS way of doing this. There is the column-span property, which is supported by Opera (currently not in a public build), but it only has two values; none and all. The spec currently doesn’t allow you to specify the number of columns, which would be very useful. It’s something I’d love to see.
Maybe the column span property can help if you create an additional container for the image and set the column-span width to the cumulated width of the middle columns.
You could also make the middle column larger and remove the need for another column, so the text and the image will be nicely aligned, but at this step, it is design consideration.
http://designshack.co.uk/tutorials/introduction-to-css3-part-5-multiple-columns
Knock out the height and width img attributes - they're not needed - and use CSS max-width:100%;
There are some backwards compatibility issues (notably with IE), but they can be plugged with JS. This method is the future.
A useful related article with references:
http://www.ldexterldesign.co.uk/2010/10/99-css-problems-but-liquid-aint-one/
Best,
Instead of defining the number of column you could define their size to adjust to the size of pictures.
Or you can define a size for every column, then you add a css selectors on images for making them automatically resize depending the width of the column.
Something like that
.column{
columns: 12em;
}
.column img{
width: 10em;
}
This is not exact answer to your question but at least there is possibility to wrap text around the image inside one column. Check "Example X" from here.
I have an image icon in an HTML page that should show right to a label only when some condition is true. If the condition is false, it should not show, but it should still take up the same space.
I'm sure most of you have done something like this and I got a couple of solutions.
Put the img tag as usual but add to its style attribute visibility: hidden when the condition is false.
Specify the width and height style attribute for the img tag and use a transparent 1 X 1 image when the condition is false.
I don't like either since it seems like pre-CSS 3. Does anyone know the best practice of doing this?
EDIT: When the image does not show, I don't need the image, but I need its space not to disrupt the positioning of the rest of the elements.
CSS 3 isn't really supported all that well and still includes most things from 1 and 2 anyway. I see absolutely nothing wrong with your first option.
option 2 is not as clean but certainly viable if you're expecting it to be viewed by something that doesn't support CSS.
Create div with the size of the image e.g. width/height and show or not the image in the div
The "best practice" here would mean not printing the image at all, if there is no reason to be printing an image. I assume since you mention a 1x1 pixel, that you are simply trying to hide the image altogether. So don't print it!
If your layout needs the image to exist though (let's say you have a link gallery where every link has an image) then you need some sort of icon/picture that indicates there IS NO picture -- something generic like a silhouette or question mark.
I have an issue best shown by example: http://dont.net/DesigningIntro/index.html
Here the last "Car Exterior" is opened fully, but not properly opens as like other small bars. It gets hidden while hovering on other links.
I want it to be shown, and not get hidden even if I hover on other tabs.
Any suggestions?
Looks like the problem is the car_L.jpg image in the .jimgMenu ul li.car_ext a element is being moved to the next line when it animates somehow due to the min-width css tag. Removing that causes the image to be set to just 56px wide by the animation when not hovering on it. Not what you want.
However, I kind of made it work by setting the background image for the .jimgMenu Div. See the result here: http://jsbin.com/ayutu and code here: http://jsbin.com/ayutu/edit
I am not 100% sure whether this is causing your issue or not, but it looks like you have the ending of a comment tag before your tag. I would try removing that and see if it fixes the problem first.
When you first come into the page there are 9 accordion panels. when you hover over one there are only eight.
So, do you have the control setup for 9 panels even when you hover? maybe you need to clear out the last panel on hover so the control knows to reclaim the space and then put it back on mouse out.
the next issue then might be that the control will resize because now the last panel is missing so the max width will be less.
Maybe you are forgetting the image for "Car Exterior" of 56x330px? Also, you don't have an image with vertical letters for "Interior".
Then you are not referencing them well, because if I search images on your page with the Firefox's add-on Web Developer Toolbar it doesn't find the images Car Exterior or Interior.