I recently tried out the div with different shape like triangle trapezoid etc.
HTML:
<div class="triangle">HI nice to meet you guys</div>
CSS
.triangle {
width: 0;
height: 0;
border-left: 50px solid transparent;
border-right: 50px solid transparent;
border-bottom: 100px solid blue;
}
Previously, the content appears properly when the div is a square (height and width are 100px).
When I style the div to look like a triangle, then the content oveflows.
How can I make this one as proportional in order to appear properly inside the div.
See fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/7qbGX/2/
Any suggestion would be great.
try this: LINK
.triangle{
width: 0px;
height: 0px;
border-style: inset;
border-width: 0 100px 173.2px 100px;
border-color: transparent transparent #007bff transparent;
float: left;
transform:rotate(360deg);
-ms-transform:rotate(360deg);
-moz-transform:rotate(360deg);
-webkit-transform:rotate(360deg);
-o-transform:rotate(360deg);
}
.triangle p {
text-align: center;
top: 80px;
left: -47px;
position: relative;
width: 93px;
height: 93px;
margin: 0px;
}
Your Height and width is 0. You won't fit any text into it. It will either overflow or you can set overflow to "hidden", but than you will not see anything cos the div have the size 0.
your div is invisible to see in your actual div try to give background-color to that div.
[see demo]http://jsfiddle.net/salwenikhil0724/7qbGX/6/
.triangle {
width: 0;
height: 0;
border-left: 50px solid transparent;
border-right: 50px solid transparent;
border-bottom: 100px solid blue;
background-color:red;
}
.triangle p {
text-align: center;
top: 40px;
left: -47px;
position: relative;
width: 93px;
height: 93px;
margin: 0px;
}
This is for displayed text properly, you need to mentioned width property as follows:-
<div style="width: 10em; word-wrap: break-word;">
Some longer than expected text with antidisestablishmentarianism
</div>
for Horizontal scroll you can put overflow-x:hidden its up to you dear.
Related
I have a design. In this design, one is overlapping on another image. I have created some code to try as given in the design. but it's not working for me. Click here to find the design
Below is some line of code of components. that is tried by me
<div className="container">
<Image className="container-img1" src={img1}/>
<Image className="container-img2" src={img2}/>
</div>
below is a style in scss
.container{
text-align: center;
.container-img1{
position: inherit;
left: 0;
top: 0;
height: auto;
border-radius: 50%;
border: 3px solid grey;
margin-right: -5rem;
}
.container-img1{
position: inherit;
left: 0;
top: 0;
height: auto;
border-radius: 50%;
border: 3px solid grey;
margin-left: -5rem;
}
}
Click Here to check what I have designed. but it's not looking as given in design.
How can I style the same as given in Design? And should be responsive also.
To achieve the demo image you can eliminate the border with transparency for the img2 that has higher stack order in DOM.
.container-img1 {
position: inherit;
left: 0;
top: 0;
height: 7rem;
border-radius: 50%;
border: 3px solid grey;
/* Reduce the margin so that the border aligns properly */
margin-right: -1.1rem;
}
.container-img2 {
position: inherit;
left: 0;
top: 0;
height: 7rem;
border-radius: 50%;
border: 3px solid grey;
/* Reduce the margin so that the border aligns properly */
margin-left: -1.1rem;
/* make it transparent */
border-left-color: transparent;
}
To make it responsive, the image width seems very small but you need to adjust the width & margin according to the device size using media query.
Hello is it possible to make a image have a slanted right side border.
.fh {
border-right: 180px solid transparent;
}
<div class="fh"><img src="img/fh.jpg" style="max-height: 500px;"></div>
So what I basically want is this http://prntscr.com/glcq2l but with the image instead.
One possible solution is to have a div which you rotate and set overflow hidden. There is a wrap around it, just in case you want to use it it makes it easier to place the image.. fiddle to play around here (I left the borders just to help understand whats going on)
(The background image on the body is just there to show that the cut off corner is transparent and not a border or anything like that.)
body {
background-image: url(https://i.stack.imgur.com/xxGZk.jpg);
}
* { box-sizing: border-box; }
.wrap {
position: relative;
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
border: solid 2px black;
overflow:hidden;
}
.fh {
position: relative;
top: -5px;
left: -250px;
width: 600px;
height: 700px;
transform: rotate(45deg);
overflow: hidden;
border-top:solid 1px red;
border-bottom:solid 1px red;
border-left:solid 1px orange;
border-right:solid 1px lime;
}
.fh img {
position: absolute;
margin: -30px 0px 0 30px;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
border:solid 2px green;
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
transform: rotate(-45deg);
}
<div class="wrap">
<div class="fh">
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/400/200/sports/1/" >
</div>
</div>
A lot of answers and possible solutions can also be found here: Cut Corners using CSS of course they need to be tweaked to your request.
I am having issues placing my dT(Date/Time) div at the bottom of it's containing div. I have tried setting bottom: 0px; to no avail. Below is the html and css code I am using.
HTML:
<div class='container'>
<aside>
<img id="user-pic" src="images/blank-user.jpg">
#User_Name
<div id="trend"><h6>TRENDING</h6></div>
</aside>
<section class="main">
</section>
</div>
CSS:
#dT{
width:inherit;
bottom: 0px;
border-top: gray;
background-color: gray;
font-size: small;
}
.container{
margin-top: 80px;
}
section{
margin: auto;
width: 400px;
clear: left;
top: 100px;
}
.tweet{
width: 450px;
height: 225px;
background-color: #FFFFFF;
border: 4px solid #F1433F;
border-top-left-radius: 20px;
border-bottom-right-radius: 20px;
margin-bottom: 15px;
padding: 25px 15px 0px 15px;
}
.tweetContent{
width: inherit;
height: inherit;
margin: 5px 5px 0 5px;
border-bottom: 1px solid #EEEEEE;
border-top: 1px solid #EEEEEE;
}
There is some JQuery elements within my code that I have not poseted because I do not believe it would have any effect on the positioning of a div.
It appears that the jquery aspect of the code might have something to do with it so here it is.
UPDATE: removed JQuery because it was not relevant.
Add position:relative to parent of your #dT element . Only if it is relative you can control the child elements using left , right , bottom and top.
Update:
And to the child elements for which you want to change position using left add position:absolute
P.S : Need to add relative for the div that contains #dT and absolute for #dT
#parentofdT
{
position:relative;
}
#dT
{
position:absolute
}
Easily pixed with position:absolute;: https://jsfiddle.net/1Lsnjou9/
Good luck.
You should add position: relative or position: absolute property to make the bottom: 0px work
#dT{
width:inherit;
bottom: 0px;
border-top: gray;
background-color: gray;
font-size: small;
position: relative;
}
use position property like position absolute or position relative so as to work with top, left,right,bottom properties
so, i made a simple animated progress bar in jQuery. you can view it here.
I need some code in this post, so here's my CSS:
.progress {
height: 14px;
width: 300px;
background: #111;
border-radius: 5px;
vertical-align: middle;
display: inline-block;
overflow: hidden;
color: white;
}
.filename {
font-size: 10px;
color: white;
position: relative;
}
.progresstop {
padding: 4px;
width: 40px;
border-top-left-radius: 5px;
border-bottom-left-radius: 5px;
height: 8px;
float: left;
background: #c44639;
vertical-align: middle;
display: inline-block;
}
.arrow-right {
width: 0px;
height: 0px;
border-style: solid;
background: #111;
border-width: 7px 7px 7px ;
border-color: transparent transparent transparent #c44639;
float: left;
display: inline-block;
}
my question: as the progress bar reaches the end, the elements "pop" out of existence when they overflow the div and are hidden, instead of staying visible until they're completely out of the div. specifically, when the CSS arrow disappears as it reaches the end, the end of the progress bar changes from a triangle to a line, which is really visually jarring. is there any way to change this behavior, either in CSS or jQuery, to have elements hide "smoothly"?
Altenatively to JoshC's answer,
you could wrap it in a container like this fiddle
HTML
<div id="progress-container">
<div class='progress'>
<div class='progresstop'></div>
<div class='arrow-right'></div>
<div class='filename'>FILENAME</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS
#progress-container {
height: 14px;
width: 300px;
background: #111;
border-radius: 5px;
vertical-align: middle;
display: inline-block;
overflow: hidden;
color: white;
}
.progress {
height: 14px;
width: 500px; /* large value */
}
Just make sure that the .progess width is larger than what you need (text, arrow, and bar)
You are looking for white-space: pre.
Here is an updated example - it works how you want it to now.
.filename {
white-space: pre;
}
EDIT
If you want to remove the glitch at the end of the animation (where the arrow jumps to a new line), use the following markup/CSS:
jsFiddle example - less HTML now, since the arrow is a pseudo element.
HTML
<div class='progress'>
<div class='progresstop'></div>
<div class='arrow-right'></div> /* Removed this, and made the arrow a psuedo element. */
<div class='filename'>FILENAME</div>
</div>
CSS
.filename:before {
content:"\A";
width: 0px;
height: 0px;
border-style: solid;
border-width: 7px 7px 7px;
border-color: transparent transparent transparent #c44639;
position:absolute;
}
I know with some border tricks, I could create trapezoid shape. I can also set its border-color to rgba(r,g,b,a) to make it transparent.
But is it possible to create trapezoid that has transparent borders and background ?
See below image for an example,
Currently, I use some png images to achieve this effect，but generating images of different sizes is really boring work，so I'm looking for a css soluation。
Personally, I think it's overkill, but it can be done like this:
demo
HTML:
<div class='outer'>
<div class='content'><!--stuff here--></div>
<div class='label l1'></div>
<div class='label l2'></div>
</div>
CSS:
.outer {
position: relative;
width: 500px; /* whole thing breaks if this is not a multiple of 100px */
border: solid .5em rgba(0,0,255,.5);
border-bottom: solid 0px transparent;
margin: 7em auto 0;
background: rgba(0,0,0,.5);
background-clip: padding-box;
}
.outer:before, .outer:after {
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
height: .5em;
background: rgba(0,0,255,.5);
content: ''
}
.outer:before { left: -.5em; width: 15%; border-left: solid .5em transparent; }
.outer:after { right: -.5em; width: 55%; border-right: solid .5em transparent; }
.content {
padding: .5em;
margin: 1.5em;
border-bottom: solid 1.5em transparent;
background: lightblue;
background-clip: padding-box;
}
.label {
overflow: hidden;
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
width: 15%;
height: 3em;
}
.l1 { left: 15%; }
.l2 { left: 30%; }
.label:before {
position: absolute;
top: -.5em;
width: 100%;
height: 2.5em;
border: solid .5em rgba(0,0,255,.5);
background: rgba(0,0,0,.5);
background-clip: padding-box;
content: '';
}
.l1:before { left: 9%; transform: skewX(30deg); }
.l2:before { right: 9%; transform: skewX(-30deg); }
It works in Firefox, Chrome, Opera and Safari (I was afraid to test it in IE9, though both transform and background-clip work) but only if the width for .outer has a value that's a multiple of 100px.
Unless using a width that's a multiple of 100px, it only works in Firefox and Chrome (there is a little glitch in Chrome - could be fixed by using a WebKit-only left to right linear gradient that sharply goes from transparent to that semitransparent blue really close to the start).
It breaks in Opera and Safari (if using a width that is not a multiple of 100px):
You can make the bg color and border colors transparent, but the borders will not follow the shape of the trapezoid:
http://jsfiddle.net/Kyle_Sevenoaks/UZbJh/1/
So your best bet is to stick with the pngs for now.