JS / jQuery : background image onload - javascript

I have function that is supposed to wait till background image is loaded and then add image's ratio to it's container and fade background image container in. It seems to work in Chrome, but fails in Internet explorer 8 and 9, and not always works in 10. In ie8 it doesn't seem to understand jquery on('load') event. In ie 9 and 10 it not always finds width of background image. How can I make it work in ie8+ and other major browsers?
js:
$('.item').each(function(index) {
var thisItem = $(this);
var image_url = thisItem.find('.img').css('background-image');
var img = new Image();
img.src = image_url.replace(/(^url\()|(\)$|[\"\'])/ig, '');
if (image_url){
//initialize only when background img is loaded
var $img = $('<img>').attr('src', img.src).on('load', function(){
//don't allow img to be larger than it is
if(img.width < thisItem.width()){thisItem.css({'max-width':img.width+'px'});}
var ratio = img.height/img.width;
thisItem.find('.item_ratio').css({'padding-bottom':ratio*100+'%'});
thisItem.find('.img').fadeIn(800);
});
}
});
html:
<div class="item">
<div class="img" style="background-image:url('some_url'); width: 100%; background-size: cover;"></div>
<div class="item_ratio"></div>
<!-- Some other not important html ->
</div>

The load event on images has been shown to be unreliable/absent, which is why there's a well-known jQuery plugin to help smoothen things out cross-browser. I'd recommend having a look at that instead rather than trying to figure out the browser issues and edge cases like missing load events when browsers fetch images from cache etc.
Edit: code sample to make it work with a dangling <img/> (untested)
//initialize only when background img is loaded
var $img = $('<img>').attr('src', img.src).prependTo(thisItem).hide().imagesLoaded(function() {
//don't allow img to be larger than it is
//... [your code]
});
I used this approach here. (The thumbs on the left are a single background image sprite, I animate those in once the image has loaded).
As an aside, you may also be able to use background-size: contain in CSS. Doing that might be more performant in newer browsers (if images are large) and much simpler since you don't need any code. It's unsupported in IE8 though, which you can test if you're using Modernizr. That would probably be my preferred approach, but I normally include Modernizr anyway. YMMV.

Related

Smooth way to replace background-image

I’m quite new to jQuery and JS and been asked to write a script that will be loading background-image progressively - I mean that low quality image should appear immediately and when full size image is loaded should replace the small one.
I found some tips how to do something similar by layering <img /> on top of background-image however in my case i have to deal with background-image only, so I have made this:
$('.img-loader').each(function(){
var box = this;
var smallImg = $(this).attr('style');
var bigImg = smallImg.replace('.jpg)', 'big.jpg)');
var imgUrl = bigImg.replace('background-image: url', '');
var imgUrlS = imgUrl.replace(/[{()}]/g, '');
console.log(imgUrlS);
$('<img/>').attr('src', imgUrlS).load(function(){
$(this).remove();
$(box).attr('style', bigImg);
});
})
The script basically does the job but in that moment when the image gets replaced there is a quite noticeable ‘shake’.
Any ideas how to make transition smoother or anyone knows what causing this 'shake'?
Edit: As suggested I'm adding a markup snipped of where script has to be applied.
<div class="about__section__bgimage img-loader"
style="background-image: url(<?php echo $contentBlock->imageurl ?>)"></div>
I suggest you create two separate elements with the same size, overlapping each other, with position: absolute; make one of them visible with the original bg image (using opacity: 1). The second one invisible (using opacity:0)
Once the higher quality image is completely loaded, set the opacity of the original image to 0 and the new image to 1.
use a css transition on the opacity property to make the opacities change smoothly.
you have to use animation for this. Use any of them according to your scenario enjoy it !!!
https://daneden.github.io/animate.css/

How can I display an image in webkit really fast?

I'm building a photo application using electron that loads user photos from the file system. These photos can easily be 7MB or more in size. The application allows the user to switch between photo's using the keyboard arrows, at which point I want the new photo to display extremely fast.
For a 7MB image, just changing the src of an existing image tag in the DOM can take ~200-300ms, webkit must load the file, decode the file, and render the file on the page. The loading and decoding take 100-150ms each. (actually the profiler just says 2 x decoding, but the next step removes one of those decodes, so I presume it's related to the file read).
Preloading an img tag...
var img = new Image();
img.src = "/path/to/photo.jpg"
...means that webkit preloads the file, and this strips the file load time, but there is still a 100-150ms delay in appending like this...
domElement.appendChild(img);
...because the read data must still be decoded for the item to be appended to the DOM.
Is there a way to pre-decode the image, so that appending to the DOM does not have a 100-150ms delay, and only the fast rendering is required?
No you cannot "pre-decode". However, you can pre-append the img in an effectively invisible way by applying the style width: 1px; height: 1px; opacity: 0.01, and webkit won't redo the work if you append again.
You can even remove the image in the mean time, provided it has had time to fully decode, and webkit will hold on to the decoded data (although I'm not sure for how long).
If you want to be absolutely certain it will load fast, you could do one of two things. Reveal the img tag by removing the styles above, or by loading the same img tag in a different part of the DOM, while leaving the 'pre-appended' one in place. This will take between 3ms and 20ms in my experience.
BE CAREFUL regarding cleanup if you are using a lot of user defined photo contents.
In my experience, simply removing numerous img elements from the DOM will cause memory leaks (and electron windows to crash). I would advise that you either set the img.src to null after removing the image from the DOM, or set the entire img to null if you no longer need the Image instance.
You could play with the following code (use images of your own) using the chrome devtools timeline to measure the render speeds of photos in different scenarios.
<style>
/*#preload img {
width: 1px;
height: 1px;
opacity: 0.01;
}*/
</style>
<button>Toggle Image</button>
<div id="container"></div>
<div id="preload"></div>
<script>
"use strict"
const button = document.getElementsByTagName('button')[0]
, container = document.getElementById('container')
, preload = document.getElementById('preload')
, img1 = new Image()
, img2 = new Image()
var current = img2
img1.src = './img1.JPG'
img2.src = './img2.JPG'
preload.appendChild(img2)
setTimeout(function(){
preload.removeChild(preload.childNodes[0])
}, 200)
button.addEventListener('click', function(e){
toggleImg()
})
function toggleImg(){
if (current === img1) {
setImg(img2);
} else {
setImg(img1)
}
}
function setImg(img){
if (container.hasChildNodes()) container.removeChild(container.childNodes[0])
container.appendChild(img)
current = img
}
</script>
I'd suggest experimenting with using the HTML5 Canvas to render your images, that way you can load the next image ahead of time and have more direct control over the caching strategy.

Skrollr Image Flicker. Firefox preload issue

Im in the process of developing a 'flipbook-style' animation using Skrollr by triggering background image changes when the user scrolls to indicated positions on the page. The issue i'm having is that in browser the image changes are delayed, creating what can only be defined as a 'flicker' of white between the frames.
<div class="section" style="background: url('frame1.png')"
data-560-top="background-image:!url('frame1.png');"
data-440-top="background-image:!url('frame2.png');">
The HTML is simple; it basically states that at 560 pixels from the top of the div (in relation to the browser window), the background should be at frame 1, then as the user scrolls closer to the div (440 pixels from the top of the div) the background image changes to frame 2. I plan to use up to around 20 frames and the images are quite large.
I have created a JSBin here which includes a very simplified sample with images from placehold.it. This includes the Skrollr script and an example layout of a section of my project. The key difference being that the images in my project are of much larger scale.
(function($) {
var cache = [];
// Arguments are image paths relative to the current page.
$.preLoadImages = function() {
var args_len = arguments.length;
for (var i = args_len; i--;) {
var cacheImage = document.createElement('img');
cacheImage.src = arguments[i];
cache.push(cacheImage);
}
};
})(jQuery);
jQuery.preLoadImages(
'http://www.placehold.it/300x200.png',
'http://www.placehold.it/300x200.png'
);
The above snippet seems to be working on Chrome, however the flicker issue remains in Firefox. Based on research, firefox handles cached images differently from Chrome? (e.g Where an image is not considered needed by firefox at a given time, it is trashed?)
I would like to know how I could possibly force all browsers to preload the images efficiently, to potentially avoid the background image flicker upon change. I am still quite new to Javascript/JQuery.
I hope I have provided a clear explanation. All assistance appreciated.
Dan
You can preload images using CSS only, no need for JS. Check out this article for more info. Another interesting way to do it is in the comment section of the article. Basically you assign the background image to a pseudo-element so that is is cached and ready to be used whenever. See this code for an example:
#something:before {
content: url("./img.jpg");
width:0;
height:0;
visibility:hidden;
}

How to prevent a background image flickering on change

I'm applying a repeated background image from a canvas to a div via javascript like this:
var img_canvas = document.createElement('canvas');
img_canvas.width = 16;
img_canvas.height = 16;
img_canvas.getContext('2d').drawImage(canvas, 0, 0, 16, 16);
var img = img_canvas.toDataURL("image/png");
document.querySelector('#div').style.backgroundImage = 'url(' + img + ')';
I have to update it quite frequently. The problem is it flickers upon change, it doesn't appear to happen in Chrome but it's really bad in Firefox and Safari. Is it possible to stop this? I didn't think it would happen since it's a dataurl and therefore doesn't need to be downloaded.
Solution:
// create a new Image object
var img_tag = new Image();
// when preload is complete, apply the image to the div
img_tag.onload = function() {
document.querySelector('#div').style.backgroundImage = 'url(' + img + ')';
}
// setting 'src' actually starts the preload
img_tag.src = img;
Try to preload the image resource to the device storage by including the image in DOM like in the following HTML-Code. Maybe the error comes up because the image resource need to be loaded which takes some time (flickering).
<img src="imageToPreload.png" style="display:none;" alt="" />
You may prefer to use sprites-images. By using sprites your application will need less HTTP-Requests to load all ressources into your page. Also add the following CSS styles if you are using css animations. It will prevent background flickering on mobile devices:
-webkit-backface-visibility: hidden;
-moz-backface-visibility: hidden;
-ms-backface-visibility: hidden;
Preload your image like this, no need to include a <img> with display: none
<link rel="preload" href="/images/bg-min.png" as="image">
Try adding this css to your background element:
-webkit-backface-visibility: hidden;
-moz-backface-visibility: hidden;
-ms-backface-visibility: hidden;
It should help with flickering..
You can also "force" hardware acceleration by adding this to your background element:
-webkit-transform: translate3d(0, 0, 0);
Another option is to use image instead of DIV and change only the image url.
I struggled with this for a bit, tried preloading, appending the image to the document, etc.
In the end, I resaved the JPEG without the "Progressive" option.
That fixed the rolling flicker when the img src was swapped.
In my case changing height: 1080px; (background height) to height: fit-content;
I think that preloading all the images is essential in any case. What I found is that the way the browsers behave while changing the background image dynamically is different from one another. In Firefox for example it flickers when the change is frequent however in Chrome and Safari it doesn't.
The best solution I came up with so far is drawing the image inside a child canvas that fills the space of the whole parent div.
In all cases, the images you are using must be optimized as it affects the rendering performance.
My javascript code that works now, looks like this
const pic = new Image();
const pic2 = new Image();
pic.src="../images/settings_referrals_anim.gif";
pic2.src="../images/settings_referrals_still.png";
I don't actually reference that code in the query, for example, i use
document.querySelector(".button_Settings_referrals").addEventListener("mouseover", function() {
myDiv.style.backgroundImage = "url('../images/settings_referrals_anim.gif')";
But it seems to work. If I replace the long URL with const pic for example it doesn't work, and if I include the image object declaration and location at first time in the assignment, then the flickering stops.
This does not address all of the specifics noted by the OP, but might be useful for others. Tested in Chrome 97, Firefox 96, Android 11, iOS 15.
I have a div that includes these CSS parameters...
#div_image {
background-image: url( [Path to low-res image] );
background-size: cover;
}
I have a corresponding class that looks like this...
.div_image_highres {
background-image: none !important;
}
The corresponding class has a pseudo-element defined as follows:
.div_image_highres::before {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
content: " ";
background-image: url( [Path to highres image] );
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: 50% 0;
background-size: cover;
opacity: 1;
display: block;
}
I have an img element that also points to the high-res image...
<img id="img_highres_preload" src=" [Path to high-res image ] ">
The img element has a corresponding style which allows the image to be displayed (ensuring that image file loads) but not seen...
#img_highres_preload {
width: 1px;
height: 1px;
}
Two notes: (1) I realize a lot of people use other methods of pre-loading (e.g., programmatically), but I have a personal preference for this method. (2) See the addendum about the reliability of the load event.
Last but not least, I have some Javascript (jQuery) that adds the "high-res" class to "div_image" once the high-res file is loaded...
$(document).ready(function() {
$("#img_highres_preload").off().on("load", function() {
$("#div_image").addClass("div_image_highres");
});
});
This could easily be vanilla JS, but since I use jQuery throughout my code, I like having a consistency.
Here's a summary of what's happening...
Presumably, the low-res image is loaded first and becomes the background image for the div. Even if that does not occur, everything will work as intended (i.e., the high-res image will be displayed).
When the high-res image loads into the img element (i.e., Javascript confirms that the high-res file is loaded), the "div_image_highres" class is applied to "div_image".
As result, the div switches to the high-res image without flashing. In my experience, if anything, it shifts a little to the left; but that often doesn't occur and, if it does, it's not inelegant.
And here's the primary reason I use this approach when required: In my application, there are multiple panels the user can navigate, which results in one panel sliding out of view and the new one into view. If I don't use a pseudo-element (as described above) for displaying a high-res image, the image flickers when its div is hidden and re-displayed. With the above-described technique, I can slide the div in and out of view without any flickering.
Regarding the Load Event
You can't depend on the load event firing. For instance, it typically does not fire when the browser has cached an image. So to make a long post even longer, here's the enhancement I have in my code to accommodate that reality...
I modify the document.ready event (shown above) to look like this:
$(document).ready(function() {
positionOnPage(true);
$("#img_highres_preload").off().on("load", function() {
checkImage();
});
});
checkImage = function() {
var image = $("#img_highres_preload")[0];
if (!image.complete || (typeof image.naturalWidth != "undefined" && image.naturalWidth == 0)) {
console.log("Waiting for high-res image.");
}
else if (!$("#div_home").hasClass("div_home_highres")) {
$("#div_home").addClass("div_home_highres");
$("#img_highres_preload").remove();
}
}
The checkImage function examines the image element to see whether an image has in fact been loaded. In this code example, it is a little redundant — that is, the img element has confirmed the load, so there's usually no need to check it (unless there is some reason to believe the file is being misloaded).
I might do it as shown because I also call checkImage from other places in my code, so if I have more of a programmatic response (unlike the simple version shown), I want all of that code in the same place and written just once. The checkImage function might be called when triggered by a timer or when the section displaying the intended image is about to be displayed. Perhaps something like this...
if (sectionName == "[whatever]" && $("#img_highres_preload").length === 1) {
checkImage();
}
In this example, I look for the presence of the preload img element because I know that my previous function removes the element after it has fulfilled its purpose.
This post has a stripped-down version to illustrate the concept. As written above, it only accommodates a single known img element, so the code could be extended to call checkImage with some parameters (e.g., the name of an image or the element itself) and checkImage could look for the existence of the preload element, so that check occurs in one place. It can be fairly fancy, so I went with the simplest example for this post.
In many cases, this stripped-down version is all I need because typically I only use a high-res photo for a window background image. I either start with the display of a low-res image and switch it out as soon as the high-res file is loaded, or I have some animation that gets triggered after I confirm the presence of the high-res image.
A good case for a more generalized version is when I need a series of images loaded at the outset and don't want to start until all of them are ready. In those cases, the web page might begin with some welcome text that stays displayed until all images have been confirmed.
Hey Guys I know this has been an older question but if you are still flickering after all this you can simply put the final version behind you background div. That flicker is seeing behind the image you currently have so if its the final image it will be smooth.

jQuery data() and resize() to change src attribute

I'm working on a script uses jQuery's data() function and HTML5 data attributes to dynamically switch an image's src attribute based on a media query. The idea behind this is to serve a lo-fi image by default (optimized for mobile), and serve a hi-fi image for larger screens. (This is not necessarily limited to images.) The script works 100% in Chrome/Opera/Safari/iOS but not completely in FF and IE.
<img src="ex1_lo-res.png" data-websrc="ex2_hi-res.png" alt="example">
<img src="ex2_lo-res.png" data-websrc="ex2_hi-res.png" alt="example">
A live example of this in use is responsetheme.com, where above 480px wide, the image should be pink, and below 480px wide, it should be yellow. I know that both data() and Modernizr.mq are supported in FF and IE—I tested them without the resize() function. So I think the issue has something to do with the trigger or the each() or resize() function. Any idea on what I'm missing?
jQuery(document).ready(function($) {
/* get elements that have a data-websrc attribute */
$websrc = $('[data-websrc]');
$websrc.each(function() {
/*
Set data-osrc equal to element's original src value.
This allows us the ability to access the original src
(even after we replace the attribute).
*/
var $this = $(this);
$this.data('osrc', $this.attr('src'));
});
$(window).resize(function() {
/*
Check breakpoint.
(Modernizr.mq checks the media query and returns boolean.)
*/
airsrcWEB = Modernizr.mq('screen and (min-width:480px)');
/*
Replace src with data-websrc (if above breakpoint).
Otherwise fallback to data-osrc (original src).
*/
$websrc.each(function() {
var $this = $(this);
var src = ( window.airsrcWEB ) ? $this.data('websrc') : $this.data('osrc');
$this.attr('src', src);
});
}).resize(); // trigger resize handlers
});
Also, I wasn't sure as to whether I have the functions in the most efficient way as far as which was inside which, so I'd also like to hear any tips for speeding this up. =)
Update 1: I also tried with the ternary like this and still the same issue:
var src = ( airsrcWEB ) ? $this.data('websrc') : $this.data('osrc');
Update 2: I figured out the issue with FF. Apparently a FF6 window won't resize below about 556px wide. I tested the script with a breakpoint above that and the switch worked. (Even the examples on mediaqueri.es won't shrink below 556px wide in FF6.)
You already found out that FF has a minimal window size. I don't know the exact value, but I believe it's a percentage of the initially available viewport width.
This is a restriction of XUL, the language in which FF was written.
The question is, is this really a problem in your case? The only persons that fiddle around with the window size are (front-end) webdevelopers. Normal users just load a page and stick with it, so basically I'm thinking that you might not really need to attach this functionality to a resize event.
Furthermore, this is only an issue when users are shrinking the window, not when expanding. If they already loaded the hi-res image, why bother loading the low-res aswell?

Categories

Resources