$('.email').each(function(l,i){
var that = $(this);
var thatOtherOne = $(this:after);
$('<a>').attr('href', 'mailto: '+ that.html + thatOtherOne.css('content')).insertAfter(that);
that.hide();
});
.email:after {
content: "#mydomain.com";
}
<span class="email">info</span>
Hello again Stackoverflow!
This is my method against spam. Using CSS the :after selector and content I try fill my custom email in inside the <span> and the css adds the url. This doesn't make it clickable though, so that's why I try the above method using JS/jQuery.
This sadly doesn't work because $(this:after); is not a valid selector. How can I change this?
You simply cannot construct a selector like that; it really doesn't make syntactic sense. Selectors are for searching through the DOM. To do what you're trying to do, you can try using the attr() trick in your "content":
.email:after {
content: attr(data-domain);
}
Then in your markup:
<a class=email data-domain='#whatever.com'>info</a>
And your JavaScript can then do this:
$('.email').each(function(l,i){
var that = $(this);
var domain = that.data('domain');
$('<a>').prop('href', 'mailto: ' + that.text() + domain).insertAfter(that);
that.hide();
});
The idea is to keep stuff that your code actually needs to use in a separate attribute, and then use the attr() operator (or whatever you want to call it) in the CSS rule to get that attribute value and use it as content. The operator can be combined with strings if you like. Chris Coyier has a good blog post about it.
Related
Lets say I have an empty div:
<div id='myDiv'></div>
Is this:
$('#myDiv').html("<div id='mySecondDiv'></div>");
The same as:
var mySecondDiv=$("<div id='mySecondDiv'></div>");
$('#myDiv').append(mySecondDiv);
Whenever you pass a string of HTML to any of jQuery's methods, this is what happens:
A temporary element is created, let's call it x. x's innerHTML is set to the string of HTML that you've passed. Then jQuery will transfer each of the produced nodes (that is, x's childNodes) over to a newly created document fragment, which it will then cache for next time. It will then return the fragment's childNodes as a fresh DOM collection.
Note that it's actually a lot more complicated than that, as jQuery does a bunch of cross-browser checks and various other optimisations. E.g. if you pass just <div></div> to jQuery(), jQuery will take a shortcut and simply do document.createElement('div').
EDIT: To see the sheer quantity of checks that jQuery performs, have a look here, here and here.
innerHTML is generally the faster approach, although don't let that govern what you do all the time. jQuery's approach isn't quite as simple as element.innerHTML = ... -- as I mentioned, there are a bunch of checks and optimisations occurring.
The correct technique depends heavily on the situation. If you want to create a large number of identical elements, then the last thing you want to do is create a massive loop, creating a new jQuery object on every iteration. E.g. the quickest way to create 100 divs with jQuery:
jQuery(Array(101).join('<div></div>'));
There are also issues of readability and maintenance to take into account.
This:
$('<div id="' + someID + '" class="foobar">' + content + '</div>');
... is a lot harder to maintain than this:
$('<div/>', {
id: someID,
className: 'foobar',
html: content
});
They are not the same. The first one replaces the HTML without creating another jQuery object first. The second creates an additional jQuery wrapper for the second div, then appends it to the first.
One jQuery Wrapper (per example):
$("#myDiv").html('<div id="mySecondDiv"></div>');
$("#myDiv").append('<div id="mySecondDiv"></div>');
Two jQuery Wrappers (per example):
var mySecondDiv=$('<div id="mySecondDiv"></div>');
$('#myDiv').html(mySecondDiv);
var mySecondDiv=$('<div id="mySecondDiv"></div>');
$('#myDiv').append(mySecondDiv);
You have a few different use cases going on. If you want to replace the content, .html is a great call since its the equivalent of innerHTML = "...". However, if you just want to append content, the extra $() wrapper set is unneeded.
Only use two wrappers if you need to manipulate the added div later on. Even in that case, you still might only need to use one:
var mySecondDiv = $("<div id='mySecondDiv'></div>").appendTo("#myDiv");
// other code here
mySecondDiv.hide();
if by .add you mean .append, then the result is the same if #myDiv is empty.
is the performance the same? dont know.
.html(x) ends up doing the same thing as .empty().append(x)
Well, .html() uses .innerHTML which is faster than DOM creation.
.html() will replace everything.
.append() will just append at the end.
You can get the second method to achieve the same effect by:
var mySecondDiv = $('<div></div>');
$(mySecondDiv).find('div').attr('id', 'mySecondDiv');
$('#myDiv').append(mySecondDiv);
Luca mentioned that html() just inserts hte HTML which results in faster performance.
In some occassions though, you would opt for the second option, consider:
// Clumsy string concat, error prone
$('#myDiv').html("<div style='width:'" + myWidth + "'px'>Lorem ipsum</div>");
// Isn't this a lot cleaner? (though longer)
var newDiv = $('<div></div>');
$(newDiv).find('div').css('width', myWidth);
$('#myDiv').append(newDiv);
Other than the given answers, in the case that you have something like this:
<div id="test">
<input type="file" name="file0" onchange="changed()">
</div>
<script type="text/javascript">
var isAllowed = true;
function changed()
{
if (isAllowed)
{
var tmpHTML = $('#test').html();
tmpHTML += "<input type=\"file\" name=\"file1\" onchange=\"changed()\">";
$('#test').html(tmpHTML);
isAllowed = false;
}
}
</script>
meaning that you want to automatically add one more file upload if any files were uploaded, the mentioned code will not work, because after the file is uploaded, the first file-upload element will be recreated and therefore the uploaded file will be wiped from it. You should use .append() instead:
function changed()
{
if (isAllowed)
{
var tmpHTML = "<input type=\"file\" name=\"file1\" onchange=\"changed()\">";
$('#test').append(tmpHTML);
isAllowed = false;
}
}
This has happened to me . Jquery version : 3.3.
If you are looping through a list of objects, and want to add each object as a child of some parent dom element, then .html and .append will behave very different. .html will end up adding only the last object to the parent element, whereas .append will add all the list objects as children of the parent element.
Am newbie to regex am trying to do some regex replace function in java script here is my content and code
jQuery("td[headers='name_head']").each(function (index, value) {
var text = jQuery(this).html();
if( text.indexOf('<a href=') >= 0){
jQuery(this).text(text.replace(/<a href=.*\"$/, ""));
}
});
Html content will be look like this
Calculate Points
i just want to remove only the value inside href ""
Please throw some light on this
Regards
Sathish
The text() method just retrieves the text contents which doesn't include any HTML tags. You can use html() method with a callback function where you can get the old HTML content as the second argument to the callback and based on the old value generate updated HTML.
The better way is to update the href attribute value of a tag to empty by directly selecting them, there is no need to loop over them since all values need to be empty.
jQuery("td[headers='name_head'] a").attr('href', '');
UPDATE 1 : In case you want to iterate and do some operation based on condition then do something like this.
jQuery("td[headers='name_head'] a").each(function(){
if(//your ondition){
$(this).attr('href', '');
}
});
or
jQuery("td[headers='name_head']").each(function(){
if(//your ondition){
$('a', this).attr('href', '');
}
});
UPDATE 2 : If you want to remove the entire attribute then use removeAttr('href') method which removes the entire attribute itself.
jQuery("td[headers='name_head'] a").removeAttr('href');
Why would you reinvent the wheel?
You don't need regex to achieve this, you can simply do it this way:
jQuery("td[headers='name_head'] a").attr('href', '');
It will set href to "" for all <a> elements inside td[headers='name_head'] so it will always respect your condition.
I haven't tested this code; but something like this should help, don't think you need to use regex for this;
$('a.DisableItemLink[href!=''][href]').each(function(){
var href = $(this).attr('href');
// do something with href
})
This piece of code selects all elements which have the class DisableItemLink with a location set and sets it to blank.
I am curious as to what you are trying to do in the larger scheme of things though, sounds like there might be better ways to go about it.
Reference: some good selector combinations for links
Can anyone tell me how can I use these two functions without using jQuery?
I am using a pre coded application that I cannot use jQuery in, and I need to take HTML from one div, and move it to another using JS.
You can replace
var content = $("#id").html();
with
var content = document.getElementById("id").innerHTML;
and
$("#id").append(element);
with
document.getElementById("id").appendChild(element);
.html(new_html) can be replaced by .innerHTML=new_html
.html() can be replaced by .innerHTML
.append() method has 3 modes:
Appending a jQuery element, which is irrelevant here.
Appending/Moving a dom element.
.append(elem) can be replaced by .appendChild(elem)
Appending an HTML code.
.append(new_html) can be replaced by .innerHTML+=new_html
Examples
var new_html = '<span class="caps">Moshi</span>';
var new_elem = document.createElement('div');
// .html(new_html)
new_elem.innerHTML = new_html;
// .append(html)
new_elem.innerHTML += ' ' + new_html;
// .append(element)
document.querySelector('body').appendChild(new_elem);
Notes
You cannot append <script> tags using innerHTML. You'll have to use appendChild.
If your page is strict xhtml, appending a non strict xhtml will trigger a script error that will break the code. In that case you would want to wrap it with try.
jQuery offers several other, less straightforward shortcuts such as prependTo/appendTo after/before and more.
To copy HTML from one div to another, just use the DOM.
function copyHtml(source, destination) {
var clone = source.ownerDocument === destination.ownerDocument
? source.cloneNode(true)
: destination.ownerDocument.importNode(source, true);
while (clone.firstChild) {
destination.appendChild(clone.firstChild);
}
}
For most apps, inSameDocument is always going to be true, so you can probably elide all the parts that function when it is false. If your app has multiple frames in the same domain interacting via JavaScript, you might want to keep it in.
If you want to replace HTML, you can do it by emptying the target and then copying into it:
function replaceHtml(source, destination) {
while (destination.firstChild) {
destination.removeChild(destination.firstChild);
}
copyHtml(source, destination);
}
Few years late to the party but anyway, here's a solution:
document.getElementById('your-element').innerHTML += "your appended text";
This works just fine for appending html to a dom element.
.html() and .append() are jQuery functions, so without using jQuery you'll probably want to look at document.getElementById("yourDiv").innerHTML
Javascript InnerHTML
Code:
<div id="from">sample text</div>
<div id="to"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
var fromContent = document.getElementById("from").innerHTML;
document.getElementById("to").innerHTML = fromContent;
</script>
I need to show user's list which should look like in the example below:
Helen Burns Edward
Fairfax Rochester Bertha
Antoinetta Mason Adèle
Varens
Is there a way to achieve this without using javascript? Each row should be one span, i.e. <span>Helen</span><span>Burns</span> is not acceptable.
No, there is not. You are going to have to use some form of scripting to accomplish this if you don't want your last names to be in their own tags.
To the browser, each row is an element, and the "words" themselves have no separate meaning as far as CSS is concerned. You must place the words in different tags in order to do what you want.
The browser does not automagically know what part of the name is the last name so you have to add extra markup to achieve what you want.
There's no solution for common used browser for know using only CSS. You should use javascript or HTML + CSS as you already made.
without pure css this is impossible (as you don't want a separation in the markup)...
<span>Monty Burns</span><br />
<span>Bart Simpson</span>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function() {
var spans = $('span');
spans.each(function(index, element) {
var span = $(element);
var spanText = span.text();
var spanTextArray = spanText.split(' ');
var spanTextArrayLength = spanTextArray.length;
var lastName = spanTextArray[spanTextArrayLength -1];
spanTextArray.pop();
var firstName = spanTextArray.join(' ');
span.text(firstName);
var spanLastName = $('<span/>');
spanLastName.css('font-weight', 'bold');
spanLastName.css('margin-left', '5px');
spanLastName.appendTo(span);
spanLastName.text(lastName);
});
});
</script>
working demo.
edit: if you do not want an extra span-tag in there, just change
var spanLastName = $('<span/>');
spanLastName.css('font-weight', 'bold');
to
var spanLastName = $('<strong/>');
I don't think this is possible with CSS because your example doesn't show any order:
Helen Burns
Edward Fairfax Rochester
Bertha Antoinetta Mason
Adèle Varens
I don't know why you might desire not to have an extra tag surrounding the last name (as other answers and comments have suggested), but if you are looking simply for minimalist mark-up, this works (no span even used):
Html:
<body>
First Middle <strong>Last</strong>
First Middle <strong>Last</strong>
First Middle <strong>Last</strong>
</body>
Css:
strong:after {content:' '; display: block;}
Which creates "rows" with your desired styling without anything more than a single tag (which could be a span rather than a strong if you desired).
Edit: Of course, this will not work for IE7 or under.
I have some HTML that is stored as an attribute on a tag. I can access it in jQuery using
$("input[id$='_myField_hiddenSpanData']").attr("value")
This looks like this:
"<span id='spantest\user' tabindex='-1' contentEditable='false' class='ms-entity-resolved' title='test\user'><div style='display:none;' id='divEntityData' key='test\user' displaytext='Test User' isresolved='True' description='test\user'><div data=''></div></div><span id='content' tabindex='-1' contenteditable onMouseDown='onMouseDownRw();' onContextMenu='onContextMenuSpnRw();' >Test User</span></span>"
I would need the value of the key attribute (test\user). Can I somehow tell jQuery to parse a block of HTML and apply selectors to it? I found I can wrap it into a new jQuery object by wrapping it into another $(): $($("input[id$='_myField_hiddenSpanData']").attr("value")) but I still did not manage to apply a selector on it.
Any hints? And no, sadly I do not control the markup that generates the hidden field.
Wrap your crappy markup with a jQuery object, and then use the find function to apply a selector to it...
var crappyHtml = $("input[id$='_myField_hiddenSpanData']").attr("value");
var key = $(crappyHtml).find("div[key]").attr("key");
alert(key);
Try this:
var html = $("input[id$='_myField_hiddenSpanData']").attr("value");
var user = $(html).find("#divEntityData").attr("key");
alert("user=" + user);
You should be able to pass it as a context. Does this work?:
$('#divEntityData', $($("input[id$='_myField_hiddenSpanData']").attr("value"))).attr('key');