Develop Reference

Why object method is rewrites the original objects? [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Is JavaScript a pass-by-reference or pass-by-value language?
(33 answers)
Closed 3 years ago.
Does JavaScript pass by references or pass by values?
Here is an example from JavaScript: The Good Parts. I am very confused about the my parameter for the rectangle function. It is actually undefined, and redefined inside the function. There are no original reference. If I remove it from the function parameter, the inside area function is not able to access it.
Is it a closure? But no function is returned.
var shape = function (config) {
var that = {};
that.name = config.name || "";
that.area = function () {
return 0;
};
return that;
};
var rectangle = function (config, my) {
my = my || {};
my.l = config.length || 1;
my.w = config.width || 1;
var that = shape(config);
that.area = function () {
return my.l * my.w;
};
return that;
};
myShape = shape({
name: "Unhnown"
});
myRec = rectangle({
name: "Rectangle",
length: 4,
width: 6
});
console.log(myShape.name + " area is " + myShape.area() + " " + myRec.name + " area is " + myRec.area());

Primitives are passed by value, and Objects are passed by "copy of a reference".
Specifically, when you pass an object (or array) you are (invisibly) passing a reference to that object, and it is possible to modify the contents of that object, but if you attempt to overwrite the reference it will not affect the copy of the reference held by the caller - i.e. the reference itself is passed by value:
function replace(ref) {
ref = {}; // this code does _not_ affect the object passed
}
function update(ref) {
ref.key = 'newvalue'; // this code _does_ affect the _contents_ of the object
}
var a = { key: 'value' };
replace(a); // a still has its original value - it's unmodfied
update(a); // the _contents_ of 'a' are changed

Think of it like this:
Whenever you create an object in ECMAscript, this object is formed in a mystique ECMAscript universal place where no man will ever be able to get. All you get back is a reference to that object in this mystique place.
var obj = { };
Even obj is only a reference to the object (which is located in that special wonderful place) and hence, you can only pass this reference around. Effectively, any piece of code which accesses obj will modify the object which is far, far away.

My two cents.... It's irrelevant whether JavaScript passes parameters by reference or value. What really matters is assignment vs. mutation.
I wrote a longer, more detailed explanation in this link.
When you pass anything (whether that be an object or a primitive), all JavaScript does is assign a new variable while inside the function... just like using the equal sign (=).
How that parameter behaves inside the function is exactly the same as it would behave if you just assigned a new variable using the equal sign... Take these simple examples.
var myString = 'Test string 1';
// Assignment - A link to the same place as myString
var sameString = myString;
// If I change sameString, it will not modify myString,
// it just re-assigns it to a whole new string
sameString = 'New string';
console.log(myString); // Logs 'Test string 1';
console.log(sameString); // Logs 'New string';
If I were to pass myString as a parameter to a function, it behaves as if I simply assigned it to a new variable. Now, let's do the same thing, but with a function instead of a simple assignment
function myFunc(sameString) {
// Reassignment... Again, it will not modify myString
sameString = 'New string';
}
var myString = 'Test string 1';
// This behaves the same as if we said sameString = myString
myFunc(myString);
console.log(myString); // Again, logs 'Test string 1';
The only reason that you can modify objects when you pass them to a function is because you are not reassigning... Instead, objects can be changed or mutated.... Again, it works the same way.
var myObject = { name: 'Joe'; }
// Assignment - We simply link to the same object
var sameObject = myObject;
// This time, we can mutate it. So a change to myObject affects sameObject and visa versa
myObject.name = 'Jack';
console.log(sameObject.name); // Logs 'Jack'
sameObject.name = 'Jill';
console.log(myObject.name); // Logs 'Jill'
// If we re-assign it, the link is lost
sameObject = { name: 'Howard' };
console.log(myObject.name); // Logs 'Jill'
If I were to pass myObject as a parameter to a function, it behaves as if I simply assigned it to a new variable. Again, the same thing with the exact same behavior but with a function.
function myFunc(sameObject) {
// We mutate the object, so the myObject gets the change too... just like before.
sameObject.name = 'Jill';
// But, if we re-assign it, the link is lost
sameObject = {
name: 'Howard'
};
}
var myObject = {
name: 'Joe'
};
// This behaves the same as if we said sameObject = myObject;
myFunc(myObject);
console.log(myObject.name); // Logs 'Jill'
Every time you pass a variable to a function, you are "assigning" to whatever the name of the parameter is, just like if you used the equal = sign.
Always remember that the equals sign = means assignment.
And passing a parameter to a function also means assignment.
They are the same and the two variables are connected in exactly the same way.
The only time that modifying a variable affects a different variable is when the underlying object is mutated.
There is no point in making a distinction between objects and primitives, because it works the same exact way as if you didn't have a function and just used the equal sign to assign to a new variable.

Function arguments are passed either by-value or by-sharing, but never ever by reference in JavaScript!
Call-by-Value
Primitive types are passed by-value:
var num = 123, str = "foo";
function f(num, str) {
num += 1;
str += "bar";
console.log("inside of f:", num, str);
}
f(num, str);
console.log("outside of f:", num, str);
Reassignments inside a function scope are not visible in the surrounding scope.
This also applies to Strings, which are a composite data type and yet immutable:
var str = "foo";
function f(str) {
str[0] = "b"; // doesn't work, because strings are immutable
console.log("inside of f:", str);
}
f(str);
console.log("outside of f:", str);
Call-by-Sharing
Objects, that is to say all types that are not primitives, are passed by-sharing. A variable that holds a reference to an object actually holds merely a copy of this reference. If JavaScript would pursue a call-by-reference evaluation strategy, the variable would hold the original reference. This is the crucial difference between by-sharing and by-reference.
What are the practical consequences of this distinction?
var o = {x: "foo"}, p = {y: 123};
function f(o, p) {
o.x = "bar"; // Mutation
p = {x: 456}; // Reassignment
console.log("o inside of f:", o);
console.log("p inside of f:", p);
}
f(o, p);
console.log("o outside of f:", o);
console.log("p outside of f:", p);
Mutating means to modify certain properties of an existing Object. The reference copy that a variable is bound to and that refers to this object remains the same. Mutations are thus visible in the caller's scope.
Reassigning means to replace the reference copy bound to a variable. Since it is only a copy, other variables holding a copy of the same reference remain unaffected. Reassignments are thus not visible in the caller's scope like they would be with a call-by-reference evaluation strategy.
Further information on evaluation strategies in ECMAScript.

As with C, ultimately, everything is passed by value. Unlike C, you can't actually back up and pass the location of a variable, because it doesn't have pointers, just references.
And the references it has are all to objects, not variables. There are several ways of achieving the same result, but they have to be done by hand, not just adding a keyword at either the call or declaration site.

JavaScript is pass by value.
For primitives, primitive's value is passed. For Objects, Object's reference "value" is passed.
Example with Object:
var f1 = function(inputObject){
inputObject.a = 2;
}
var f2 = function(){
var inputObject = {"a": 1};
f1(inputObject);
console.log(inputObject.a);
}
Calling f2 results in printing out "a" value as 2 instead of 1, as the reference is passed and the "a" value in reference is updated.
Example with primitive:
var f1 = function(a){
a = 2;
}
var f2 = function(){
var a = 1;
f1(a);
console.log(a);
}
Calling f2 results in printing out "a" value as 1.

In the interest of creating a simple example that uses const...
const myRef = { foo: 'bar' };
const myVal = true;
function passes(r, v) {
r.foo = 'baz';
v = false;
}
passes(myRef, myVal);
console.log(myRef, myVal); // Object {foo: "baz"} true

In practical terms, Alnitak is correct and makes it easy to understand, but ultimately in JavaScript, everything is passed by value.
What is the "value" of an object? It is the object reference.
When you pass in an object, you get a copy of this value (hence the 'copy of a reference' that Alnitak described). If you change this value, you do not change the original object; you are changing your copy of that reference.

"Global" JavaScript variables are members of the window object. You could access the reference as a member of the window object.
var v = "initialized";
function byref(ref) {
window[ref] = "changed by ref";
}
byref((function(){for(r in window){if(window[r]===v){return(r);}}})());
// It could also be called like... byref('v');
console.log(v); // outputs changed by ref
Note, the above example will not work for variables declared within a function.

Without purisms, I think that the best way to emulate scalar argument by reference in JavaScript is using object, like previous an answer tells.
However, I do a little bit different:
I've made the object assignment inside function call, so one can see the reference parameters near the function call. It increases the source readability.
In function declaration, I put the properties like a comment, for the very same reason: readability.
var r;
funcWithRefScalars(r = {amount:200, message:null} );
console.log(r.amount + " - " + r.message);
function funcWithRefScalars(o) { // o(amount, message)
o.amount *= 1.2;
o.message = "20% increase";
}
In the above example, null indicates clearly an output reference parameter.
The exit:
240 - 20% Increase
On the client-side, console.log should be replaced by alert.
★ ★ ★
Another method that can be even more readable:
var amount, message;
funcWithRefScalars(amount = [200], message = [null] );
console.log(amount[0] + " - " + message[0]);
function funcWithRefScalars(amount, message) { // o(amount, message)
amount[0] *= 1.2;
message[0] = "20% increase";
}
Here you don't even need to create new dummy names, like r above.

I can't see pass-by-reference in the examples where people try to demonstrate such. I only see pass-by-value.
In the case of variables that hold a reference to an object, the reference is the value of those variables, and therefore the reference is passed, which is then pass-by-value.
In a statement like this,
var a = {
b: "foo",
c: "bar"
};
the value of the 'a' is not the Object, but the (so far only) reference to it. In other words, the object is not in the variable a - a reference to it is. I think this is something that seems difficult for programmers who are mainly only familiar with JavaScript. But it is easy for people who know also e.g. Java, C#, and C.

Objects are always pass by reference and primitives by value. Just keep that parameter at the same address for objects.
Here's some code to illustrate what I mean (try it in a JavaScript sandbox such as https://js.do/).
Unfortunately you can't only retain the address of the parameter; you retain all the original member values as well.
a = { key: 'bevmo' };
testRetain(a);
document.write(' after function ');
document.write(a.key);
function testRetain (b)
{
document.write(' arg0 is ');
document.write(arguments[0].key);
b.key = 'passed by reference';
var retain = b; // Retaining the original address of the parameter
// Address of left set to address of right, changes address of parameter
b = {key: 'vons'}; // Right is a new object with a new address
document.write(' arg0 is ');
document.write(arguments[0].key);
// Now retrieve the original address of the parameter for pass by reference
b = retain;
document.write(' arg0 is ');
document.write(arguments[0].key);
}
Result:
arg0 is bevmo arg0 is vons arg0 is passed by reference after function passed by reference

Primitives are passed by value. But in case you only need to read the value of a primitve (and value is not known at the time when function is called) you can pass function which retrieves the value at the moment you need it.
function test(value) {
console.log('retrieve value');
console.log(value());
}
// call the function like this
var value = 1;
test(() => value);

Is there a form of C++ references in Javascript? [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Is JavaScript a pass-by-reference or pass-by-value language?
(33 answers)
Closed 3 years ago.
Does JavaScript pass by references or pass by values?
Here is an example from JavaScript: The Good Parts. I am very confused about the my parameter for the rectangle function. It is actually undefined, and redefined inside the function. There are no original reference. If I remove it from the function parameter, the inside area function is not able to access it.
Is it a closure? But no function is returned.
var shape = function (config) {
var that = {};
that.name = config.name || "";
that.area = function () {
return 0;
};
return that;
};
var rectangle = function (config, my) {
my = my || {};
my.l = config.length || 1;
my.w = config.width || 1;
var that = shape(config);
that.area = function () {
return my.l * my.w;
};
return that;
};
myShape = shape({
name: "Unhnown"
});
myRec = rectangle({
name: "Rectangle",
length: 4,
width: 6
});
console.log(myShape.name + " area is " + myShape.area() + " " + myRec.name + " area is " + myRec.area());

Primitives are passed by value, and Objects are passed by "copy of a reference".
Specifically, when you pass an object (or array) you are (invisibly) passing a reference to that object, and it is possible to modify the contents of that object, but if you attempt to overwrite the reference it will not affect the copy of the reference held by the caller - i.e. the reference itself is passed by value:
function replace(ref) {
ref = {}; // this code does _not_ affect the object passed
}
function update(ref) {
ref.key = 'newvalue'; // this code _does_ affect the _contents_ of the object
}
var a = { key: 'value' };
replace(a); // a still has its original value - it's unmodfied
update(a); // the _contents_ of 'a' are changed

Think of it like this:
Whenever you create an object in ECMAscript, this object is formed in a mystique ECMAscript universal place where no man will ever be able to get. All you get back is a reference to that object in this mystique place.
var obj = { };
Even obj is only a reference to the object (which is located in that special wonderful place) and hence, you can only pass this reference around. Effectively, any piece of code which accesses obj will modify the object which is far, far away.

My two cents.... It's irrelevant whether JavaScript passes parameters by reference or value. What really matters is assignment vs. mutation.
I wrote a longer, more detailed explanation in this link.
When you pass anything (whether that be an object or a primitive), all JavaScript does is assign a new variable while inside the function... just like using the equal sign (=).
How that parameter behaves inside the function is exactly the same as it would behave if you just assigned a new variable using the equal sign... Take these simple examples.
var myString = 'Test string 1';
// Assignment - A link to the same place as myString
var sameString = myString;
// If I change sameString, it will not modify myString,
// it just re-assigns it to a whole new string
sameString = 'New string';
console.log(myString); // Logs 'Test string 1';
console.log(sameString); // Logs 'New string';
If I were to pass myString as a parameter to a function, it behaves as if I simply assigned it to a new variable. Now, let's do the same thing, but with a function instead of a simple assignment
function myFunc(sameString) {
// Reassignment... Again, it will not modify myString
sameString = 'New string';
}
var myString = 'Test string 1';
// This behaves the same as if we said sameString = myString
myFunc(myString);
console.log(myString); // Again, logs 'Test string 1';
The only reason that you can modify objects when you pass them to a function is because you are not reassigning... Instead, objects can be changed or mutated.... Again, it works the same way.
var myObject = { name: 'Joe'; }
// Assignment - We simply link to the same object
var sameObject = myObject;
// This time, we can mutate it. So a change to myObject affects sameObject and visa versa
myObject.name = 'Jack';
console.log(sameObject.name); // Logs 'Jack'
sameObject.name = 'Jill';
console.log(myObject.name); // Logs 'Jill'
// If we re-assign it, the link is lost
sameObject = { name: 'Howard' };
console.log(myObject.name); // Logs 'Jill'
If I were to pass myObject as a parameter to a function, it behaves as if I simply assigned it to a new variable. Again, the same thing with the exact same behavior but with a function.
function myFunc(sameObject) {
// We mutate the object, so the myObject gets the change too... just like before.
sameObject.name = 'Jill';
// But, if we re-assign it, the link is lost
sameObject = {
name: 'Howard'
};
}
var myObject = {
name: 'Joe'
};
// This behaves the same as if we said sameObject = myObject;
myFunc(myObject);
console.log(myObject.name); // Logs 'Jill'
Every time you pass a variable to a function, you are "assigning" to whatever the name of the parameter is, just like if you used the equal = sign.
Always remember that the equals sign = means assignment.
And passing a parameter to a function also means assignment.
They are the same and the two variables are connected in exactly the same way.
The only time that modifying a variable affects a different variable is when the underlying object is mutated.
There is no point in making a distinction between objects and primitives, because it works the same exact way as if you didn't have a function and just used the equal sign to assign to a new variable.

Function arguments are passed either by-value or by-sharing, but never ever by reference in JavaScript!
Call-by-Value
Primitive types are passed by-value:
var num = 123, str = "foo";
function f(num, str) {
num += 1;
str += "bar";
console.log("inside of f:", num, str);
}
f(num, str);
console.log("outside of f:", num, str);
Reassignments inside a function scope are not visible in the surrounding scope.
This also applies to Strings, which are a composite data type and yet immutable:
var str = "foo";
function f(str) {
str[0] = "b"; // doesn't work, because strings are immutable
console.log("inside of f:", str);
}
f(str);
console.log("outside of f:", str);
Call-by-Sharing
Objects, that is to say all types that are not primitives, are passed by-sharing. A variable that holds a reference to an object actually holds merely a copy of this reference. If JavaScript would pursue a call-by-reference evaluation strategy, the variable would hold the original reference. This is the crucial difference between by-sharing and by-reference.
What are the practical consequences of this distinction?
var o = {x: "foo"}, p = {y: 123};
function f(o, p) {
o.x = "bar"; // Mutation
p = {x: 456}; // Reassignment
console.log("o inside of f:", o);
console.log("p inside of f:", p);
}
f(o, p);
console.log("o outside of f:", o);
console.log("p outside of f:", p);
Mutating means to modify certain properties of an existing Object. The reference copy that a variable is bound to and that refers to this object remains the same. Mutations are thus visible in the caller's scope.
Reassigning means to replace the reference copy bound to a variable. Since it is only a copy, other variables holding a copy of the same reference remain unaffected. Reassignments are thus not visible in the caller's scope like they would be with a call-by-reference evaluation strategy.
Further information on evaluation strategies in ECMAScript.

As with C, ultimately, everything is passed by value. Unlike C, you can't actually back up and pass the location of a variable, because it doesn't have pointers, just references.
And the references it has are all to objects, not variables. There are several ways of achieving the same result, but they have to be done by hand, not just adding a keyword at either the call or declaration site.

JavaScript is pass by value.
For primitives, primitive's value is passed. For Objects, Object's reference "value" is passed.
Example with Object:
var f1 = function(inputObject){
inputObject.a = 2;
}
var f2 = function(){
var inputObject = {"a": 1};
f1(inputObject);
console.log(inputObject.a);
}
Calling f2 results in printing out "a" value as 2 instead of 1, as the reference is passed and the "a" value in reference is updated.
Example with primitive:
var f1 = function(a){
a = 2;
}
var f2 = function(){
var a = 1;
f1(a);
console.log(a);
}
Calling f2 results in printing out "a" value as 1.

In the interest of creating a simple example that uses const...
const myRef = { foo: 'bar' };
const myVal = true;
function passes(r, v) {
r.foo = 'baz';
v = false;
}
passes(myRef, myVal);
console.log(myRef, myVal); // Object {foo: "baz"} true

In practical terms, Alnitak is correct and makes it easy to understand, but ultimately in JavaScript, everything is passed by value.
What is the "value" of an object? It is the object reference.
When you pass in an object, you get a copy of this value (hence the 'copy of a reference' that Alnitak described). If you change this value, you do not change the original object; you are changing your copy of that reference.

"Global" JavaScript variables are members of the window object. You could access the reference as a member of the window object.
var v = "initialized";
function byref(ref) {
window[ref] = "changed by ref";
}
byref((function(){for(r in window){if(window[r]===v){return(r);}}})());
// It could also be called like... byref('v');
console.log(v); // outputs changed by ref
Note, the above example will not work for variables declared within a function.

Without purisms, I think that the best way to emulate scalar argument by reference in JavaScript is using object, like previous an answer tells.
However, I do a little bit different:
I've made the object assignment inside function call, so one can see the reference parameters near the function call. It increases the source readability.
In function declaration, I put the properties like a comment, for the very same reason: readability.
var r;
funcWithRefScalars(r = {amount:200, message:null} );
console.log(r.amount + " - " + r.message);
function funcWithRefScalars(o) { // o(amount, message)
o.amount *= 1.2;
o.message = "20% increase";
}
In the above example, null indicates clearly an output reference parameter.
The exit:
240 - 20% Increase
On the client-side, console.log should be replaced by alert.
★ ★ ★
Another method that can be even more readable:
var amount, message;
funcWithRefScalars(amount = [200], message = [null] );
console.log(amount[0] + " - " + message[0]);
function funcWithRefScalars(amount, message) { // o(amount, message)
amount[0] *= 1.2;
message[0] = "20% increase";
}
Here you don't even need to create new dummy names, like r above.

I can't see pass-by-reference in the examples where people try to demonstrate such. I only see pass-by-value.
In the case of variables that hold a reference to an object, the reference is the value of those variables, and therefore the reference is passed, which is then pass-by-value.
In a statement like this,
var a = {
b: "foo",
c: "bar"
};
the value of the 'a' is not the Object, but the (so far only) reference to it. In other words, the object is not in the variable a - a reference to it is. I think this is something that seems difficult for programmers who are mainly only familiar with JavaScript. But it is easy for people who know also e.g. Java, C#, and C.

Objects are always pass by reference and primitives by value. Just keep that parameter at the same address for objects.
Here's some code to illustrate what I mean (try it in a JavaScript sandbox such as https://js.do/).
Unfortunately you can't only retain the address of the parameter; you retain all the original member values as well.
a = { key: 'bevmo' };
testRetain(a);
document.write(' after function ');
document.write(a.key);
function testRetain (b)
{
document.write(' arg0 is ');
document.write(arguments[0].key);
b.key = 'passed by reference';
var retain = b; // Retaining the original address of the parameter
// Address of left set to address of right, changes address of parameter
b = {key: 'vons'}; // Right is a new object with a new address
document.write(' arg0 is ');
document.write(arguments[0].key);
// Now retrieve the original address of the parameter for pass by reference
b = retain;
document.write(' arg0 is ');
document.write(arguments[0].key);
}
Result:
arg0 is bevmo arg0 is vons arg0 is passed by reference after function passed by reference

Primitives are passed by value. But in case you only need to read the value of a primitve (and value is not known at the time when function is called) you can pass function which retrieves the value at the moment you need it.
function test(value) {
console.log('retrieve value');
console.log(value());
}
// call the function like this
var value = 1;
test(() => value);

JS - Override console.log to show "object: object" of logged object? [duplicate]

I've got a feeling this might not be possible, but I would like to determine the original variable name of a variable which has been passed to a function in javascript. I don't know how to explain it any better than that, so see if this example makes sense.
function getVariableName(unknownVariable){
return unknownVariable.originalName;
}
getVariableName(foo); //returns string "foo";
getVariableName(bar); //returns string "bar";
This is for a jquery plugin i'm working on, and i would like to be able to display the name of the variable which is passed to a "debug" function.

You're right, this is very much impossible in any sane way, since only the value gets passed into the function.

This is now somehow possible thanks to ES6:
function getVariableName(unknownVariableInAHash){
return Object.keys(unknownVariableInAHash)[0]
}
const foo = 42
const bar = 'baz'
console.log(getVariableName({foo})) //returns string "foo"
console.log(getVariableName({bar})) //returns string "bar"
The only (small) catch is that you have to wrap your unknown variable between {}, which is no big deal.

As you want debugging (show name of var and value of var),
I've been looking for it too, and just want to share my finding.
It is not by retrieving the name of the var from the var but the other way around : retrieve the value of the var from the name (as string) of the var.
It is possible to do it without eval, and with very simple code, at the condition you pass your var into the function with quotes around it, and you declare the variable globally :
foo = 'bar';
debug('foo');
function debug(Variable) {
var Value = this[Variable]; // in that occurrence, it is equivalent to
// this['foo'] which is the syntax to call the global variable foo
console.log(Variable + " is " + Value); // print "foo is bar"
}

Well, all the global variables are properties of global object (this or window), aren't they?
So when I wanted to find out the name of my variables, I made following function:
var getName = function(variable) {
for (var prop in window) {
if (variable === window[prop]) {
return prop;
}
}
}
var helloWorld = "Hello World!";
console.log(getName(helloWorld)); // "helloWorld"
Sometimes doesn't work, for example, if 2 strings are created without new operator and have the same value.

Global w/string method
Here is a technique that you can use to keep the name and the value of the variable.
// Set up a global variable called g
var g = {};
// All other variables should be defined as properties of this global object
g.foo = 'hello';
g.bar = 'world';
// Setup function
function doStuff(str) {
if (str in g) {
var name = str;
var value = g[str];
// Do stuff with the variable name and the variable value here
// For this example, simply print to console
console.log(name, value);
} else {
console.error('Oh snap! That variable does not exist!');
}
}
// Call the function
doStuff('foo'); // log: foo hello
doStuff('bar'); // log: bar world
doStuff('fakeVariable'); // error: Oh snap! That variable does not exist!
This is effectively creating a dictionary that maps variable names to their value. This probably won't work for your existing code without refactoring every variable. But using this style, you can achieve a solution for this type of problem.
ES6 object method
In ES6/ES2015, you are able to initialize an object with name and value which can almost achieve what you are trying to do.
function getVariableName(unknownVariable) {
return Object.keys(unknownVariable)[0];
}
var foo = 'hello';
var output = getVariableName({ foo }); // Note the curly brackets
console.log(output);
This works because you created a new object with key foo and value the same as the variable foo, in this case hello. Then our helper method gets the first key as a string.
Credit goes to this tweet.

Converting a set of unique variable into one JSON object for which I wrote this function
function makeJSON(){ //Pass the variable names as string parameters [not by reference]
ret={};
for(i=0; i<arguments.length; i++){
eval("ret."+arguments[i]+"="+arguments[i]);
}
return ret;
}
Example:
a=b=c=3;
console.log(makeJSON('a','b','c'));
Perhaps this is the reason for this query

I think you can use
getVariableName({foo});

Use a 2D reference array with .filter()
Note: I now feel that #Offermo's answer above is the best one to use. Leaving up my answer for reference, though I mostly wouldn't recommend using it.
Here is what I came up with independently, which requires explicit declaration of variable names and only works with unique values. (But will work if those two conditions are met.)
// Initialize some variables
let var1 = "stick"
let var2 = "goo"
let var3 = "hello"
let var4 = "asdf"
// Create a 2D array of variable names
const varNames = [
[var1, "var1"],
[var2, "var2"],
[var3, "var3"]
]
// Return either name of variable or `undefined` if no match
const getName = v => varNames.filter(name => name[0] === v).length
? varNames.filter(name => name[0] === v)[0][1]
: undefined
// Use `getName` with OP's original function
function getVariableName(unknownVariable){
return getName(unknownVariable)
}

This is my take for logging the name of an input and its value at the same time:
function logVariableAndName(unknownVariable) {
const variableName = Object.keys(unknownVariable)[0];
const value = unknownVariable[variableName];
console.log(variableName);
console.log(value);
}
Then you can use it like logVariableAndName({ someVariable })

__hash__ for javascript?

Is there a way to give objects in js custom hashes, just as overriding
__hash__()
in python let's someone define how a given object is hashed into a dictionary.
My underlying question is: what hash function is used to put js objects into associative arrays, and can I over-ride it?

You mean using objects as keys, how do you make sure you access that key again?
The magic method is toString(). Turns out all objects in JS use string keys, and the toString() method is called if it's not a string.
http://jsfiddle.net/udsdT/1/
var objA = {
data: 'yay',
toString: function() {
return 'value_as_key';
}
};
var objB = {
data: 'some other totally data thing',
toString: function() {
return 'value_as_key';
}
}
var foo = {};
foo[objA] = 'abc';
foo[objB] = 'def';
foo['value_as_key'] = 'qwe';
foo.value_as_key = 'omg';
foo[objA]; // 'omg'
foo[objB]; // 'omg'
foo['value_as_key']; // 'omg'
foo.value_as_key; // 'omg'
​​​​​​Usually though, you really don't want to use whole objects as keys. Especially if you dont create your own toString() method, since the default toString() method on basic objects isn't exactly very awesome...
({a:123}).toString() // [object Object]
({b:456}).toString() // [object Object]
var foo = {};
foo[{a:123}] = 'wtf';
foo[{asdf:9876}]; // 'wtf'
foo['[object Object]']; // 'wtf

In JS, you can't control the hashing, but you don't have to.
Two things are the same if they're equal. The hash is not part of the definition, it's just an implementation detail. Under the covers, two different objects may have the same hash, but they're still different, and the implementation has to deal with that magically (e.g., by using a chaining hash table).
Also, the keys of an object are always strings—the interpreter will stringify the values inside the hash constructor, inside the [], or after the ., rather than storing the actual values, which means that this rarely comes up in the first place.
To give some examples:
function X() {}
x = new X()
y = new Y()
h = {x: 2, y: 3} // h has 2 members, named "x" and "y"
a = (x, y)
b = (x, y)
h[a] = 4
h[b] = 5 // h has 3 members, named "x", "y", and "[object Object]"
Put in Python terms, it's as if dict called __repr__ on keys instead of __hash__ (although this isn't quite 100% accurate), which means you can provide a custom toString method to control equal-ness of different instances of your class.

How to access the properties of a JavaScript object?

while review a javascript coding, i saw that
var detailInf = {
"hTitle":"Results",
"hMark":"98"
};
What's the concept behind this js coding. While give alert for the variable its shows as "[object Object]". So this is an object, then how can we access the variable and reveal the data from this object.

Try doing this:
alert(detailInf['hTitle']);
alert(detailInf.hTitle);
Both will alert "Results" - this is a Javascript object that can be used as a dictionary of sorts.
Required reading: Objects as associative arrays
As a footnote, you should really get Firebug when messing around with Javascript. You could then just console.log(detailInf); and you would get a nicely mapped out display of the object in the console.

That form of a JavaScript object is called an object literal, just like there are array literals. For example, the following two array declarations are identical:
var a = [1, 2, 3]; // array literal
var b = new Array(1, 2, 3); // using the Array constructor
Just as above, an object may be declared in multiple ways. One of them is object literal in which you declare the properties along with the object:
var o = {property: "value"}; // object literal
Is equivalent to:
var o = new Object; // using the Object constructor
o.property = "value";
Objects may also be created from constructor functions. Like so:
var Foo = function() {
this.property = "value";
};
var o = new Foo;
Adding methods
As I said in a comment a few moments ago, this form of declaring a JavaScript object is not a JSON format. JSON is a data format and does not allow functions as values. That means the following is a valid JavaScript object literal, but not a valid JSON format:
var user = {
age : 16,
// this is a method
isAdult : function() {
// the object is referenced by the special variable: this
return this.age >= 18;
}
};
Also, the name of the properties need not be enclosed inside quotes. This is however required in JSON. In JavaScript we enclose them in brackets where the property name is a reserved word, like class, while and others. So the following are also equivalent:
var o = {
property : "value",
};
var o = {
"property" : "value",
};
Further more, the keys may also be numbers:
var a = {
0 : "foo",
1 : "bar",
2 : "abz"
};
alert(a[1]); // bar
Array-like objects
Now, if the above object would have also a length property, it will be an array like object:
var arrayLike = {
0 : "foo",
1 : "bar",
2 : "baz",
length : 3
};
Array-like means it can be easily iterated with normal iteration constructs (for, while). However, you cannot apply array methods on it. Like array.slice(). But this is another topic.
Square Bracket Notation
As Paolo Bergantino already said, you may access an object's properties using both the dot notation, as well as the square bracket notation. For example:
var o = {
property : "value"
};
o.property;
o["property"];
When would you want to use one over the other? People use square bracket notation when the property names is dynamically determined, like so:
var getProperty = function(object, property) {
return object[property];
};
Or when the property name is a JavaScript reserved word, for example while.
object["while"];
object.while; // error

That's an object in JSON format. That's a javascript object literal. Basically, the bits to the left of the :'s are the property names, and the bits to the right are the property values. So, what you have there is a variable called detailInf, that has two properties, hTitle and hMark. hTitle's value is Results, hMark's value is 98.
var detailInf = { "hTitle":"Results", "hMark":"98"};
alert(detailInf.hTitle); //should alert "Results"
alert(detailInf.hMark); //should alert "98
Edit Paolo's answer is better :-)

As Dan F says, that is an object in JSON format. To loop through all the properties of an object you can do:
for (var i in foo) {
alert('foo[' + i + ']: ' + foo[i]);
}