I have large images of varying dimensions that need to completely fill 240px by 300px containers in both dimensions. Here is what I got right now, which only works for one dimension:
http://jsfiddle.net/HsE6H/
HTML
<div class="container">
<img src="http://placehold.it/300x1500">
</div>
<div class="container">
<img src="http://placehold.it/1500x300">
</div
CSS
.container {
height: 300px;
width: 240px;
background-color: red;
float: left;
overflow: hidden;
margin: 20px;
}
img {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
The proportions should stay the same. Essentially, wide images should be cut off in width, while high images need to be cut off in height. So just zooming in as much as is needed to fill the container.
Not sure why I can't get it to work, do I need JavaScript for this?
Edit: To be clear. I need everything red on the fiddle gone. The images coming in are dynamic, therefore I can't use background-images. I'm open to using JavaScript. Thanks! :)
Auto-sizing Images to Fit a Div - Making the CSS Work
Here is one way of doing it, start with the following HTML:
<div class="container portrait">
<h4>Portrait Style</h4>
<img src="http://placekitten.com/150/300">
</div>
and the CSS:
.container {
height: 300px;
width: 240px;
background-color: red;
float: left;
overflow: hidden;
margin: 20px;
}
.container img {
display: block;
}
.portrait img {
width: 100%;
}
.landscape img {
height: 100%;
}
and the demo fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/audetwebdesign/QEpJH/
When you have an image oriented as a portrait, you need to scale the width to 100%. Conversely, when the image is landscape oriented, you need to scale the height.
Unfortunately, there is no combination of selectors in CSS that targets the aspect ratio of the image, so you can't use CSS to pick out the correct scaling.
In addition, you have no easy way of centering the image since the top left corner of the image is pinned to the top left corner of the containing block.
jQuery Helper
You can use the following jQuery action to determine which class to set based
on the aspect ratio of the image.
$(".container").each(function(){
// Uncomment the following if you need to make this dynamic
//var refH = $(this).height();
//var refW = $(this).width();
//var refRatio = refW/refH;
// Hard coded value...
var refRatio = 240/300;
var imgH = $(this).children("img").height();
var imgW = $(this).children("img").width();
if ( (imgW/imgH) < refRatio ) {
$(this).addClass("portrait");
} else {
$(this).addClass("landscape");
}
})
For each image in .container, get the height and width, test if width<height and then set the appropriate class.
Also, I added a check to take into account the aspect ratio of the containing block.
Before, I had implicitly assumed a square view panel.
For anyone looking to do this that doesn't have dynamic images, here's an all-CSS solution using background-image.
<div class="container"
style="background-image: url('http://placehold.it/300x1500');
background-size: cover; background-position: center;">
</div>
<div class="container"
style="background-image: url('http://placehold.it/1500x300');
background-size: cover; background-position: center;">
</div>
The "background-size: cover" makes it so that the image scales to cover all of the div while maintaining the aspect ratio. The CSS could also be moved to a CSS file. Although if it's dynamically generated, the background-image property will have to stay in the style attribute.
Taking out the line: max-width:100% in your CSS file seems to do the trick.
.container {
height: 300px;
width: 240px;
background-color: red;
float: left;
overflow: hidden;
margin: 20px;
}
img {
height: auto;
}
Also you can add > to your closing div in your HTML file could make the code neater.
<div class="container">
<img src="http://placehold.it/300x1500">
</div>
<div class="container">
<img src="http://placehold.it/1500x300">
</div>
Here is a working JSFiddle link: http://jsfiddle.net/HsE6H/19/
Here is another solution I found, that no need to seperate portraid or landscape or scripting.
<div class="container">
<img src="http://placehold.it/500x500" class="pic" />
</div>
CSS
.container{
position: relative;
width: 500px;
height: 300px;
margin-top: 30px;
background: #4477bb;
}
.pic{
max-width: 100%;
width: auto;
max-height: 100%;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
right: 0;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
margin: auto;
}
Here it is, it works well...
https://jsfiddle.net/efirat/17bopn2q/2/
Background can do this
set image as background
2.
div {
-webkit-background-size: auto 100%;
-moz-background-size: auto 100%;
-o-background-size: auto 100%;
background-size: auto 100%;
}
or
div {
-webkit-background-size: cover;
-moz-background-size: cover;
-o-background-size: cover;
background-size: cover;
}
You should try this:
img {
min-width:100%;
min-height:100%;
}
I used this plugin that accounts for any ratio. It also requires imagesloaded plugin to work. This would be useful for numerous images across a site needing this treatment. Simple to initiate too.
https://github.com/johnpolacek/imagefill.js/
It works if you add the following to the parent div for img styling;
https://jsfiddle.net/yrrncees/10/
.container img {
position: relative;
vertical-align: middle;
top: 50%;
-webkit-transform: translateY(-50%);
min-height: 100%;
min-width: 100%;
object-fit:cover;
}
This could do the job:
.container {
float: left;
height: 300px;
width: 240px;
background-color: red;
margin: 20px;
}
img {
width:240px;
height:300px;
}
We went down the path with an Angular app of using a variation on the jQuery approach above. Then one of our bright colleagues came up with a pure CSS approach. See this example here: https://jsfiddle.net/jeffturner/yrrncees/1/.
Basically using line-height solved the problem for us. For those not wanting to hit the fiddle, the code fragments are:
.container {
margin: 10px;
width: 125px;
height: 125px;
line-height: 115px;
text-align: center;
border: 1px solid red;
}
.resize_fit_center {
max-width:100%;
max-height:100%;
vertical-align: middle;
}
The key is in using line-height and setting the container to do the same.
I came across this topic because I was trying to solve a similar problem. Then a lightbulb went off in my head and I couldn't believe it worked because it was so simple and so obvious.
CSS
.container {
height: 300px;
width: 240px;
background-color: red;
float: left;
overflow: hidden;
margin: 20px;
}
img {
min-width:100%;
min-height:100%;
}
Just set the min-width and min-height to 100% and it will always automatically resize to fit the div, cutting off the excess image. No muss no fuss.
Using an image as Div background has many disadvantages (like missing ALT for SEO). Instead of it, use object-fit: cover; in the image tag style!
The following solution is very short and clean if you need to insert img tag into div tag:
.container, .container img
{
max-height: 300px;
max-width: 240px;
}
Try to open every image into another page you will notice that originals are all different sized but none is streched, just zoomed:
<p></p>
<div class="container"><img src="https://www.gentoo.org/assets/img/screenshots/surface.png" /></div>
<p></p>
<div class="container"><img src="https://cdn.pixabay.com/photo/2011/03/22/22/25/winter-5701_960_720.jpg" /></div>
<p></p>
<div class="container"><img src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Screenshot-gnome-shell-overview.png" /></div>
<p></p>
<div class="container"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/OwFSTIw.png" /></div>
<p></p>
<div class="container"><img src="https://www.gentoo.org/assets/img/screenshots/surface.png" /></div>
<p></p>
<div class="container"><img src="https://freebsd.kde.org/img/screenshots/uk_maximignatenko_kde420-1.png" /></div>
<p></p>
<div class="container"><img src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/9mrOgkYje0s/maxresdefault.jpg" /></div>
<p></p>
<div class="container"><img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Linux_screenshot.jpg" /></div>
<p></p>
Also, if you don't need to use a div you can just write an even shorter css:
img
{
max-height: 300px;
max-width: 240px;
}
Related
I am a fullstack developer but css is my my weak point so I decided to put more effort on it. I have a weird situation and could not figure out why. The issue is I could not adjust the image height and wide properly. I m using reactstrap, bootstrap and scss but i make sure that bootstrap code will not overwrite my css:
import "bootstrap/dist/css/bootstrap.min.css";
import "../styles/main.scss";
here is the part of html:
<Col md="6">
<div className="hero-section">
<div className={`flipper ${isFlipping ? "isFlipping" : ""}`}>
<div className="front">
<div className="hero-section-content">
<h2> Full Stack Web Developer </h2>
<div className="hero-section-content-intro">
Have a look at my portfolio and job history.
</div>
</div>
<img
alt="programming welcome picture"
className="image"
src="/images/original.png"
/>
<div className="shadow-custom">
<div className="shadow-inner"> </div>
</div>
</div>
</Col>
here is the related css code:
.hero-section {
h2 {
color: black;
font-weight: bold;
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
perspective: 10rem;
color: black;
font-weight: bold;
width: 40rem;
position: relative;
&-content {
position: absolute;
bottom: 20px;
width: 360px;
left: 6%;
z-index: 1;
&-intro {
font-size: 17px;
}
}
}
.image {
max-width: 100%;
// background-size: cover;
max-height: 50%;
position: relative;
background-position: center;
}
with this I have this:
however with this .image
.image {
max-width: 100%;
// background-size: cover;
// max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
position: relative;
background-position: center;
}
I have same view. height changes if I change the width but i just want to change the height.
image css i am having this
with this .image
.image {
max-height: auto;
max-width: 100%;
background-position: center;
background-size: cover;
}
i am getting text outside the image :( even though the max-width: 100% it is not as wide as first image :(
[Edit]: I forgot I am the only one on this earth that allowed to have a well working stackblitz so just in case here is the code :
<div className="content">
<h2>FullStack developerdfghbdfg</h2>
<p>Were you looking for something like this ?</p>
</div>
And the CSS part :
.content {
padding: 15px;
padding-top: 200px;
max-width: 200px;
background-image: url('https://picsum.photos/200/300'); /* you need an HD image to do this */
background-size: cover; /* because thiswill strech your image */
color: red; /* pretty disgusting yeah ! */
}
Are you looking for something like this ? Stackblitz example
If not, can you provide the shape of your image please ? I mean, is it a loooong vertical image full of blue, or is it just the boy and screen and books and stuff and a background color set to the same blue for your container ?
why is the text outside the image?
TL;TD: the image is narrower than 40rem.
Here's the too long to read version:
by setting max-width to 100%, the image would allow itself to take 100% of its intrinsic width, but since the height is set to auto, the image width would be dictated by the intrinsic height of the image, making it a fractional width from 100%.
why is image wider and taller from your 1st scenario below?
.image {
// allows the image to take up 100% of its width
max-width: 100%;
// allows the image to take up 100% of its height
max-height: 100%;
...
}
the image is taking up the intrinsic width/height values since the <img> element is a replaced element type and its object-fit css property is not defined.
resolution 1
set div.hero-section to a fixed width and height, like this
.hero-section {
// ie. height/width can be anything you like
height: 20rem;
width: 40rem;
...
}
then set the object-fit property to cover in the .image class
.image {
...
object-fit: cover
}
resolution 2
use the image as a background image. Take out the .img class and the image markup entirely from HTML. Set the .hero-section css like this
.hero-section {
...
width: 40rem;
height: 20rem;
background-size: cover;
background-position: center;
background-image: url("/images/original.png");
...
}
I have a mock of the code in my codesandbox below
I'm attempting to set up a way for users to be able to hover over a small preview of an image and have a "featured" section show this image in its full size. I've managed to accomplish that with the code below.
My problem is when images are very different sizes (one landscape and one portrait It looks very bad and makes the page jump.
Goal: I'm trying to figure out a way to avoid this. I want to find a way to display the main image in a uniformed look. Aka the same size. I want to accomplish this without heavily distorting the images by changing their sizes. Any help is hugely appreciated.
Check out the JS fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/4hrvxpe2/10/
HTML:
<img id='mainPicture' class="image-resposive" src= "https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51EG732BV3L.jpg">
<br>
<br>
<div class='smallerImages'>
<img id='imageNum1' class="small" src="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/4393678/images/o-THE-MATRIX-facebook.jpg">
<img id='imageNum2' class="small" src="https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51EG732BV3L.jpg">
</div>
CSS:
.smallerImages{
display:inline-block;
}
#mainPicture{
width: 75%;
height: 75%;
display: table; margin: 0 auto;
}
.small{
max-width: 15%;
max-height: 15%;
min-width: 15%!important;
min-height: 15%!important;
}
Jquery:
$('#imageNum1').hover(function() {
$('.small').removeClass('selectedImage')
var src = $('#imageNum1').attr('src');
$('#imageNum1').addClass('selectedImage')
$('#mainPicture').attr('src', src);
});
$('#imageNum2').hover(function() {
$('.small').removeClass('selectedImage')
var src = $('#imageNum2').attr('src');
$('#imageNum2').addClass('selectedImage')
$('#mainPicture').attr('src', src);
});
Adding a max-height and max-width makes it better.
Check out https://jsfiddle.net/4hrvxpe2/13/
Or you can encapsulate it in a div. Something like
<div class="container"><img src="img.jpg"></div>
and give dimensions to the container, as in:
.container{
height: 100px; width: 200px; overflow: hidden;
}
Check out https://jsfiddle.net/4hrvxpe2/22/
Or
In order for the image to take a fixed size always use a div and set it as its background and make it cover the div:
Check out https://jsfiddle.net/4hrvxpe2/23/
If you don't want the images to affect the rest of the elements in the document you need to take them out of the flow.
This is possible if you give the selected image a fixed position and make use of the transform property.
With that being said, here's a very rough example of how I would do it.
Responsive example (open in full screen and resize the window):
$('#imageNum1').hover(function() {
$('.small').removeClass('selectedImage')
var src = $('#imageNum1').attr('src');
$('#imageNum1').addClass('selectedImage')
$('#mainPicture').attr('src', src);
});
$('#imageNum2').hover(function() {
$('.small').removeClass('selectedImage')
var src = $('#imageNum2').attr('src');
$('#imageNum2').addClass('selectedImage')
$('#mainPicture').attr('src', src);
});
body {
position: relative
}
.smallerImages {
width: 20%;
}
#mainPicture {
max-width: 55vw;
max-height: 75vh;
margin: 0 auto;
position: fixed;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%)
}
.small {
width: 100%;
margin: .5em auto;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div class='smallerImages'>
<img id='imageNum1' class="small" src="http://i.huffpost.com/gen/4393678/images/o-THE-MATRIX-facebook.jpg">
<img id='imageNum2' class="small" src="https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51EG732BV3L.jpg">
</div>
<img id='mainPicture' class="image-resposive" src="https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51EG732BV3L.jpg">
<br>
<br>
My best attempt so far is the following. This works okay but it does distort images that are very tall. Can anyone suggest improvements?
JSFiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/4hrvxpe2/26/
.small{
max-width: 10%;
height: 100px;
min-width: 10%!important;
}
.smallerImages{
margin: 0 auto;
}
#mainPicture{
width: 100%;
height: 600px;
display: table; margin: 0 auto;
}
I accomplished the goal by changing 15% of maximum and minimum width in .small to 15vw.
.small{
max-width: 15vw;
max-height: 15%;
min-width: 15vw!important;
min-height: 15%!important;
}
vw is for the viewport width, while % will take the content size and size it relative to that. When the image changes, because of the image size differences, that image is increasing the content width, meaning that anything using % will change to the new width.
Here's the JSFiddle.
This question already has answers here:
How do I auto-resize an image to fit a 'div' container?
(33 answers)
Closed 4 years ago.
http://jsfiddle.net/Log82brL/15/
This <img> isn't shrink wrapping as I would expect with min-width:100%
I'm trying to shrink the <img> until either height or width matches the container
Click anywhere in the <iframe> to toggle container shapes
Please try to edit the <img> CSS:
MAINTAIN ASPECT RATIO
COVER ENTIRE SURFACE AREA OF CONTAINER DIV
ONLY EDIT THE IMAGE
My question is specifically: scale an <img> to maintain aspect ratio but cover the entire surface of parent <div> even as the parent <div> resizes.
Maybe I could somehow use css flex box-layout or something? Maybe a transform?
http://jsfiddle.net/Log82brL/7/
#img {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
object-fit: cover;
}
object-fit: cover allows the replaced content is sized to maintain its aspect ratio while filling the element’s entire content box: its concrete object size is resolved as a cover constraint against the element’s used width and height.
If you don't want to touch the container, put the background on the <img>
#img {
background: url(imgpath) no-repeat center;
background-size: cover;
}
You can set HTML source to a transparent base64 pixel (credit CSS Tricks)
<img id="img" src="" />
http://jsfiddle.net/Log82brL/17/
Did u try the bootstrap solution
http://getbootstrap.com/css/#images-responsive
which is pretty much
.img-responsive
{
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
display: block;
}
Adding to your update question
http://jsfiddle.net/arunzo/Log82brL/5/
.skinny>img
{
max-width:none !important;
min-height:none !important;
max-height:100%;
-webkit-transform:translate3d(+50%, +50%, 0);
}
And still i am unsure what is that you seek, sorry for the jerky animation.
You can use CSS background instead of HTML img.
.myDiv
{
height: 400px;
width: 300px;
background-image: url('image-url.png');
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: contain;
background-position: center center;
border: 1px solid #000000;
}
<div class="myDiv">
</div>
Here is the JS Fiddle Demo.
Try to change height and width - you will see that image stretches to fill the div.
You can also different background-size values:
Proportional stretch to contain: background-size: contain;
Too tall div
Too wide div
Proportional stretch to fill: background-size: cover;
Too tall div
Too wide div
Stretch to fill 100%: background-size: 100% 100%;
Too tall div
Too wide div
use single css background shorthand property
.myDiv
{
height: 400px;/*whatever you want*/
width: 300px;/*whatever you want*/
background: url('image-url.png') no-repeat center center;
background-size: contain;
}
<div class="myDiv">
</div>
Updated answer. Now works as intended.
var toggle = false,
containerElement = document.querySelector("#container");
window.onclick = function () {
containerElement.className = (toggle = !toggle ? "skinny" : "");
}
window.alert("click anywhere to toggle shapes. img is a large square");
#container {
overflow: hidden;
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
transition: all .5s;
margin: 0 auto; /* this is just for demonstration purposes */
}
#container.skinny {
width: 200px;
height:600px;
}
#img {
height: auto;
left: 50%;
margin: auto;
min-height: 100%;
position: relative;
top: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%); /* changed to 2d translate */
width: 100%; /* full width in wide mode */
}
#container.skinny #img {
width: auto; /* width reset in tall mode */
}
<div id="container">
<img id="img" src="http://farm8.static.flickr.com/7440/12125795393_3beca9c24d.jpg" />
</div>
http://krasimirtsonev.com/blog/article/CSS-Challenge-1-expand-and-center-image-fill-div
contained AND centered
I think this is the rendering you're trying to get, this might help ;)
https://jsfiddle.net/erq1otL4/
<div id="container" style="background-image: url(http://farm8.static.flickr.com/7440/12125795393_3beca9c24d.jpg);"></div>
#container.skinny {
width: 400px;
height:600px;
}
#container {
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
overflow: hidden;
background-size: cover;
background-color:pink;
background-position: center center;
}
var toggle = false,
containerElement = document.querySelector("#container");
window.onclick = function () {
containerElement.className = (toggle = !toggle ? "skinny" : "");
}
window.alert("click anywhere to toggle shapes. img is a large square");
A while back I found a jQuery solution called "backstretch". Now this looks possible with CSS3:
html {
background: url(images/bg.jpg) no-repeat center center fixed;
background-size: cover;
}
Usually to achieve that you need to use:
parentdiv img {
width:100%;
height:auto;}
in order to make your image resize with the parent div.
This can cause some cropping issues (visually) if you set the overflow to hidden.
Try this:
<div class="img_container">
<img src="image/yourimage.jpg" alt="" />
</div>
<style type="text/css">
.img_container{
width: 400px;
height: 400px;
overflow: hidden;
}
.img_container img{
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
</style>
setting the height or the with auto will not make the image look stretched.
Use this class of Bootstrap .img-responsive and if parent div changes add media Queries to image and div both
Here is a very simple CSS solution that does not require changing the attributes of an img tag.
div{
background-image: url("http://www.frikipedia.es/images/thumb/d/d5/Asdsa-asdas.jpg/300px-Asdsa-asdas.jpg");
height: auto;
width: 400px;
overflow: hidden;
background-size: cover;
background-position: center;
}
I'm trying to centre an image, i've attached a jsfiddle to show the outcome of what I want, the only difference would be that the image is placed into the html and not the css code.
http://jsfiddle.net/6y2qjxm0/3/
Here's the css I'm using in the fiddle and i've already taken the image url out.
width:100%;
height:100%;
background: no-repeat center center fixed;
-webkit-background-size: cover;
-moz-background-size: cover;
-o-background-size: cover;
background-size: cover;
and finally here's the html:
<div class="full-screen">
<img src="http://placehold.it/350x150">
</div>
Failing this, does anyone know a better way of doing this?
It must be centred and it must be 100% width and 100% height.
Thanks
UPDATE: The image must stay in proportion like the fiddle.
UPDATED This solution is independent of the image dimensions, apart from that it needs its with to be greater than its height. It uses CSS positioning to set the image within .full-screen to be of full height, keep proportions and with a 50% negative horizontal offset (centered).
HTML:
<div class="full-screen">
<img src="http://placehold.it/350x150" />
</div>
CSS:
body, html {
margin: 0;
height: 100%;
overflow-x: hidden;
}
.full-screen {
position: relative;
height: 100%;
}
.full-screen img {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
height: 100%;
left: -50%;
}
Updated fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/5e6btwa2/1/
background-size: cover; is your best bet, with support from ie9+. Getting an img to cover the page without distorting only works if you know its size or are willing to use javascript.
Why do you need to use an img? Is it because you want the src to be added dynamically? in that case you should use an inline style.
<div style="background-image:{{dynamicImage}}"></div>
Try use attribute align with value middle in your img tag
<img src="smth.gif" align="middle">
If you want the same behavior as you had with the image as a background, you could do it like this (depends on the CSS3 transform method):
http://jsfiddle.net/6y2qjxm0/6/
HTML
<div class="full-screen">
<img src="http://placehold.it/350x150">
</div>
CSS
* {
margin:0;
padding:0;
position: relative;
}
html {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background-size: cover;
position: relative;
overflow-y: scroll;
}
body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin-left:auto;
margin-right:auto;
background: inherit;
/* overflow: hidden; enable to disable scrolling */
}
.full-screen {
width:100%;
height:100%;
overflow: hidden;
}
.full-screen img {
min-width: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%,0);
}
Try this, it works in IE8+ and pretty much every other browser:
HTML
<div class="full-screen">
<img src="http://placehold.it/350x150" />
</div>
CSS
.full-screen {
position: fixed;
top: -50%; /* this will center the image vertically */
left: -50%; /* this will center the image horizontally*/
width: 200%;
height: 200%;
}
.full-screen img {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
margin: auto;
min-width: 50%;
min-height: 50%;
}
Demo
For other ways have a look at this article on CSS tricks by Chris Coyier. The CSS above is used in Technique #2 in his examples.
I would like to place an image centrally within a div (fiddle). Because I want that div to inherit that div's height from another one that is floating next to it, I had to use this trick.
For that reason, the solutions described here don't seem to be working.
The requirement is that no other behavior is modified, but the code can be as long as the effect achieved is the same. I am also willing to accept solutions involving javascript, if necessary.
<div class="container">
<div class="logo-div">
<img class="logo" src="http://bit.ly/1qCKrtJ" />
</div>
<div class="text-div">
<h4 style="display: inline;">Because Sometimes It Takes a Village</h4><br />
What about robots the size of tea cups that scoot around on tiny wheels, snapping pictures with miniature cameras and keeping track of where they are in relation to dozens of others?
</div>
.container {
background: green;
overflow: hidden;
}
.logo-div {
background: yellow;
width: 150px;
float: left;
padding-bottom: 1000px;
margin-bottom: -1000px;
}
.text-div {
background: blue;
float: left;
max-width: 350px;
padding-bottom: 1000px;
margin-bottom: -1000px;
}
.logo {
width: 100px;
}
I have modified the code so that the logo image can be center aligned horizontally as well as vertically.
JSFiddle
HTML code:
<div class="container">
<div class="image-div">
<div class="logo-div">
<img class="logo" src="http://bit.ly/1qCKrtJ" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="text-div">
<h4 style="display: inline;">Because Sometimes It Takes a Village</h4><br />
What about robots the size of tea cups that scoot around on tiny wheels, snapping pictures with miniature cameras and keeping track of where they are in relation to dozens of others?
</div>
</div>
Css code:
.container {
background: green;
overflow: hidden;
}
.logo-div {
background: #FFFF00;
display: table-cell;
height: 100px;
text-align: center;
vertical-align: middle;
width: 150px;
}
.text-div {
background: blue;
float: left;
max-width: 350px;
}
.image-div {
float: left;
}
.logo {
width: 100px;
}
If you have further issue, please comment on the code, and modify the jsfiddle.
Regards D.
There are two ways for this. One you can set Margin property of any component to 'auto' if you want it to align at the middle. Of course you can set this property in CSS instead of using style tag.
<img src="http://bit.ly/1qCKrtJ" style="margin:auto;"/>
Another is using center tag
(As 'margin:auto' may not work for images for some browsers however it works for div tag.)
<center>
<img src="http://bit.ly/1qCKrtJ" alt="Logo">
</center>
If you need just horizontal center, try:
.logo-div {text-align: center;}
img {margin: 0 auto;}
http://jsfiddle.net/yXNnd/18/
JS version
Using jQuery (I'm too lazy :))
http://jsfiddle.net/yXNnd/25/
Add this js
$(document).ready(function(){
var img = $('.logo-div img');
var top = ($('.container').height() / 2) - (img.height() / 2);
img.css('margin-top', top + 'px');
});