Javascript - sort without sort - javascript

Problem in Javascript
I previously asked this question Javascript 2D array sorting - by numerical value with a solution provided using the sort function, which I have tried to use without sucsess. Turns out the sort function isn't correctly within the tool I am using, it sorts 5 values and then stops working - and is not working using negative values etc. Spoken to their development team and been told to upgrade - not an option.
Tl:dr - I need to sort with out using the inbuilt sort function.
I have two arrays
values = [1000, 2356, 3456778, 7645748, -2324, 348845.45, -2345666]
labels = ["ValA", "ValB", "ValC", "ValD", "ValE", "ValF", "ValG", "ValH"]
These need to be combined to show [1000,ValA, etc] with the largest value appearing first.
Without the inbuilt sort functionality, I am at a loss on how to proceed. I tried using the Math.Max to cycle through the array, but when I'd combined these two arrays the function stopped working.
I am not sure whether to combine these two individual arrays, or to keep them separate so that the sorting is simpler, remembering the original index and links to the label.
Any thoughts or questions welcome, I am truly stumped and not a developer by trade so sure there is some kind soul out there who maybe able to support me.
Thanks
Expected output
[7645748, ValD]
[3456778, ValC]
[348845.45, ValF]
[2356, ValB]
[2324, ValE]
[1000, ValA]
[-2345666, ValG]

Create an array of customr objects and pupoluate with the data
for (var i = 0; i < values.length; i++) {
myArray[i].value = values[i];
myArray[i].label = labels[i];
}
Then implement your own bubblesort algorithm :
for (var j = 0; j < myArray.length - 1; j++) {
for (var i = 0, swapping; i < myArray.length - 1; i++) {
if (myArray[i].value > myArray[i + 1].value) {
swapping = myArray[i + 1];
myArray[i + 1] = myArray[i];
myArray[i] = swapping;
};
};
};

var list = ['z','b', 'a', 'y'];
for (var j = 0; j < list.length - 1; j++) {
for (var i = 0, swapping; i < list.length - 1; i++) {
if (list[i]> list[i + 1]) {
swapping = list[i + 1];
list[i + 1] = list[i];
list[i] = swapping;
};
};
};
output will be = ["a", "b", "y", "z"]

This method is a very simple and easy way to solve a sort problem in an array without a sort() method.
function sortArray(arr) {
var temp = [];
if (Array.isArray(arr)) {
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
for (let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++) {
if (arr[i] < arr[j]) {
temp = arr[j];
arr[j] = arr[i];
arr[i] = temp;
}
}
}
return arr;
}
}
console.log(sortArray([2, 6, 0, 4, 3, 4, 3, 5, 9, 6, 12, 43, 6]));

// It will work for both Python or JS code
let b = ["ValA", "ValB", "ValC", "ValD", "ValE", "ValF", "ValG", "ValH"]
for(let i=0;i<b.length-1;i++){
for(let j=i+1;j<b.length;j++)
{
if(b[j]<b[i])
{
temp = b[j]
b[j]=b[i]
b[i] = temp
}
}
}
console.log(b)

Related

Adding Negative Integers in Javascript

I am trying to write a function that returns the first two values in order of appearance that add to the sum. My function works fine with positive numbers, but not with negative. Can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong?
This function return an empty array:
const sumOfPairs = (arr, sum) => {
const answer = [];
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
for (let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++) {
if (arr[i] + arr[j] === sum && i != j) {
answer.push(arr[j], arr[i]);
}
break;
}
}
return answer;
}
console.log(sumOfPairs([1, -2, 3, 0, -6, 1], -6));
Your implementation doesn't work for all positive numbers either. Try 3 as sum.
I believe you want to put the break statement inside the if statement or just replace the body of the if statement with return [arr[j], arr[i]]:
const sumOfPairs = (arr, sum) => {
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
for (let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++) {
if (arr[i] + arr[j] === sum && i != j) {
// You can return here if you only want to find *one* pair
// You also need add some additional logic if you want them
// to be in the same order as in the original array:
return i < j ? [arr[i], arr[j]] : [arr[j], arr[i]]
}
}
}
return []
}
console.log(sumOfPairs([1, -2, 3, 0, -6, 1], -6));
The current location of the break statement in your loop causes the inner loop to terminate after its first iteration! Therefore the inner loop is equivalent to testing whether the sum of the current outer loop's item (arr[i]) and 1 (the first element in the array) is equal the provided sum.

Pairwise sums challenge

I've got working code, but I'm looking to improve the way I understand and implement different coding techniques as a whole. I thought this problem presented a good chance to get feedback on what I'm doing.
The idea here is to take two arguments, an array and an integer. Identify all pairs in the array that sum to make the integer argument, and then return the sum of the indices. You cannot reuse an index, and you must always use the smallest index available to you. There is an explanation on the FCC code guide here: https://www.freecodecamp.org/learn/coding-interview-prep/algorithms/pairwise
So - here is the question. Is there any good way of doing this without using nested for loops? I am becoming increasingly aware of time/space complexities, and I know that O(n^2) won't land me the job.
I would imagine a hashmap of some sort would come into it, but I just don't have the experience and knowledge to know how to use them.
Here is the code:
function pairwise(arr, arg) {
let usedIndex = [];
let output = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
for (let j = i + 1; j < arr.length; j++) {
if (
arr[i] + arr[j] == arg
&& usedIndex.indexOf(i) == -1
&& usedIndex.indexOf(j) == -1
) {
usedIndex.push(i, j)
output += i + j
}
}
}
return output;
}
pairwise([0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1], 1) // should return 10
This can be done in one loop with some clever use of an object and knowledge that indices can only be used once.
function pairwise(arr, arg) {
let map = {};
let output = 0;
let length = arr.length;
for (let i = 0; i < length; i++) {
let subArr = map[arr[i]];
if(subArr && subArr[0] !== undefined) {
//there is an index waiting to pair, remove it and add to output
output += subArr.pop() + i;
} else {
//add this index to its pair slot
let left = arg - arr[i];
if(!map[left]) map[left] = [];
map[left].unshift(i);
}
}
return output;
}
console.log(pairwise([0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1], 1), "should be 10");
console.log(pairwise([1, 4, 2, 3, 0, 5], 7), "should be 11");
console.log(pairwise([], 100), "should be 0");
console.log(pairwise([1, 3, 2, 4], 4), "should be 1");
The keys of the map represent the other value needed to make a pair, and the values of the map are arrays of indices that have the value that would make a pair. The indices are inserted using unshift() so that pop() returns the first one that was inserted - the smallest one.
Iterating from the front guarantees that the smallest pairs are found first, and the map guarantees that any later index will know exactly what the earliest index that could make a pair is.
For a better performance you can save the arr.length into a variable, then for loop won't count every single loop.
function pairwise(arr, arg) {
let usedIndex = [];
let output = 0;
let length = arr.length;
for (let i = 0; i < length; i++) {
for (let j = i + 1; j < length; j++) {
if (
arr[i] + arr[j] == arg
&& usedIndex.indexOf(i) == -1
&& usedIndex.indexOf(j) == -1
) {
usedIndex.push(i, j)
output += i + j
}
}
}
return output;
}
Sort the list.
Have two counters walking from the ends. At each step check to see if the sum is what you want. If so, capture the desired metric.
Step 1 is O(n*logn).
Step 2 is O(n) -- each counter will go about halfway through the list, stopping when they meet.

javascript reverse an array without using reverse()

I want to reverse an array without using reverse() function like this:
function reverse(array){
var output = [];
for (var i = 0; i<= array.length; i++){
output.push(array.pop());
}
return output;
}
console.log(reverse([1,2,3,4,5,6,7]));
However, the it shows [7, 6, 5, 4] Can someone tell me, why my reverse function is wrong? Thanks in advance!
array.pop() removes the popped element from the array, reducing its size by one. Once you're at i === 4, your break condition no longer evaluates to true and the loop ends.
One possible solution:
function reverse(array) {
var output = [];
while (array.length) {
output.push(array.pop());
}
return output;
}
console.log(reverse([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]));
You can make use of Array.prototype.reduceright and reverse it
check the following snippet
var arr = ([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]).reduceRight(function(previous, current) {
previous.push(current);
return previous;
}, []);
console.log(arr);
In ES6 this could be written as
reverse = (array) => array.map(array.pop, [... array]);
No need to pop anything... Just iterate through the existing array in reverse order to make your new one.
function reverse(array){
var output = [];
for (var i = array.length - 1; i> -1; i--){
output.push(array[i]);
}
return output;
}
console.log(reverse([1,2,3,4,5,6,7]));
Edit after answer got accepted.
A link in a comment on your opening post made me test my way VS the accepted answer's way. I was pleased to see that my way, at least in my case, turned out to be faster every single time. By a small margin but, faster non the less.
Here's the copy/paste of what I used to test it (tested from Firefox developer scratch pad):
function reverseMyWay(array){
var output = [];
for (var i = array.length - 1; i> -1; i--){
output.push(array[i]);
}
return output;
}
function reverseTheirWay(array) {
var output = [];
while (array.length) {
output.push(array.pop());
}
return output;
}
function JustDoIt(){
console.log("their way starts")
var startOf = new Date().getTime();
for(var p = 0; p < 10000; p++)
{
console.log(reverseTheirWay([7,6,5,4,3,2,1]))
}
var endOf = new Date().getTime();
console.log("ran for " + (endOf - startOf) + " ms");
console.log("their way ends")
}
function JustDoIMyWay(){
console.log("my way starts")
var startOf = new Date().getTime();
for(var p = 0; p < 10000; p++)
{
console.log(reverseMyWay([7,6,5,4,3,2,1]))
}
var endOf = new Date().getTime();
console.log("ran for " + (endOf - startOf) + " ms");
console.log("my way ends")
}
JustDoIt();
JustDoIMyWay();
Solution to reverse an array without using built-in function and extra space.
let arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7];
let n = arr.length-1;
for(let i=0; i<=n/2; i++) {
let temp = arr[i];
arr[i] = arr[n-i];
arr[n-i] = temp;
}
console.log(arr);
Do it in a reverse way, Because when you do .pop() every time the array's length got affected.
function reverse(array){
var output = [];
for (var i = array.length; i > 0; i--){
output.push(array.pop());
}
return output;
}
console.log(reverse([1,2,3,4,5,6,7]));
Or you could cache the length of the array in a variable before popping out from the array,
function reverse(array){
var output = [];
for (var i = 0, len= array.length; i< len; i++){
output.push(array.pop());
}
return output;
}
console.log(reverse([1,2,3,4,5,6,7]));
You are modifying the existing array with your reverse function, which is affecting array.length.
Don't pop off the array, just access the item in the array and unshift the item on the new array so that the first element of the existing array becomes the last element of the new array:
function reverse(array){
var output = [],
i;
for (i = 0; i < array.length; i++){
output.unshift(array[i]);
}
return output;
}
console.log(reverse([1,2,3,4,5,6,7]));
If you'd like to modify the array in-place similar to how Array.prototype.reverse does (it's generally inadvisable to cause side-effects), you can splice the array, and unshift the item back on at the beginning:
function reverse(array) {
var i,
tmp;
for (i = 1; i < array.length; i++) {
tmp = array.splice(i, 1)[0];
array.unshift(tmp);
}
return array;
}
var a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
console.log('reverse result', reverse(a));
console.log('a', a);
This piece allows to reverse the array in place, without pop, splice, or push.
var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
function reverseArrayInPlace(arr2) {
var half = Math.floor(arr2.length / 2);
for (var i = 0; i < half; i++) {
var temp = arr2[arr2.length - 1 - i];
arr2[arr2.length - 1 - i] = arr2[i];
arr2[i] = temp;
}
return arr2;
}
As you pop items off the first array, it's length changes and your loop count is shortened. You need to cache the original length of the original array so that the loop will run the correct amount of times.
function reverse(array){
var output = [];
var len = array.length;
for (var i = 0; i< len; i++){
output.push(array.pop());
}
return output;
}
console.log(reverse([1,2,3,4,5,6,7]));
You're modifying the original array and changing it's size. instead of a for loop you could use a while
function reverse(array){
var output = [];
while(array.length){
//this removes the last element making the length smaller
output.push(array.pop());
}
return output;
}
console.log(reverse([1,2,3,4,5,6,7]));
function rvrc(arr) {
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length / 2; i++) {
const buffer = arr[i];
arr[i] = arr[arr.length - 1 - i];
arr[arr.length - 1 - i] = buffer;
}
};
const reverse = (array)=>{
var output = [];
for(let i=array.length; i>0; i--){
output.push(array.pop());
}
console.log(output);
}
reverse([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]);
This happens because every time you do array.pop(), whilst it does return the last index in the array, it also removes it from the array. The loop recalculates the length of the array at each iteration. Because the array gets 1 index shorter at each iteration, you get a much shorter array returned from the function.
This piece of code will work without using a second array. It is using the built in method splice.
function reverse(array){
for (let i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
array.splice(i, 0, array.splice(array.length - 1)[0]);
}
return array;
}
Here, let's define the function
function rev(arr) {
const na = [];
for (let i=0; i<arr.length; i++) {
na.push(arr[arr.length-i])
}
return na;
}
Let's say your array is defined as 'abca' and contains ['a','b','c','d','e','foo','bar']
We would do:
var reva = rev(abca)
This would make 'reva' return ['bar','foo','e','d','c','b','a'].
I hope I helped!
You can use .map as it is perfect for this situation and is only 1 line:
const reverse = a =>{ i=a.length; return a.map(_=>a[i-=1]) }
This will take the array, and for each index, change it to the length of the array - index, or the opposite side of the array.
with reverse for loop
let array = ["ahmet", "mehmet", "aslı"]
length = array.length
newArray = [];
for (let i = length-1; i >-1; i--) {
newArray.push(array[i])
}
console.log(newArray)
And this one:
function reverseArray(arr) {
let top = arr.length - 1;
let bottom = 0;
let swap = 0;
while (top - bottom >= 1) {
swap = arr[bottom];
arr[bottom] = arr[top];
arr[top] = swap;
bottom++;
top--;
}
}
function reverse(arr) {
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length - 1; i++) {
arr.splice(i, 0, arr.pop())
}
return arr;
}
console.log(reverse([1, 2, 3, 4, 5]))
//without another array
reverse=a=>a.map((x,y)=>a[a.length-1-y])
reverse=a=>a.map((x,y)=>a[a.length-1-y])
console.log(reverse(["Works","It","One","Line"]))
One of shortest:
let reverse = arr = arr.map(arr.pop, [...arr])
This is an old question, but someone may find this helpful.
There are two main ways to do it:
First, out of place, you basically push the last element to a new array, and use the new array:
function arrReverse(arr) {
let newArr = [];
for(let i = 0; i<arr.length; i++){
newArr.push(arr.length -1 -i);
}
return newArr;
}
arrReverse([0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]);
Then there's in place. This is a bit tricky, but the way I think of it is like having four objects in front of you. You need to hold the first in your hand, then move the last item to the first place, and then place the item in your hand in the last place.
Afterwards, you increase the leftmost side by one and decrease the rightmost side by one:
function reverseArr(arr) {
let lh;
for(let i = 0; i<arr.length/2; i++){
lh = arr[i];
arr[i] = arr[arr.length -i -1];
arr[arr.length -i -1] = lh;
}
return arr;
}
reverseArr([0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]);
Like so. I even named my variable lh for "left hand" to help the idea along.
Understanding arrays is massively important, and figuring out how they work will not only save you from unnecessarily long and tedious ways of solving this, but will also help you grasp certain data concepts way better!
I found a way of reversing the array this way:
function reverse(arr){
for (let i = arr.length-1; i >= 0; i--){
arr.splice(i, 0, arr.shift());
}
return arr;
}
Without Using any Pre-define function
const reverseArray = (array) => {
for (let i = 0; i < Math.floor(array.length / 2); i++) {
[array[i], array[array.length - i - 1]] = [
array[array.length - i - 1],
array[i]
];
}
return array;
};
let array = [1,2,3,4,5,6];
const reverse = (array) => {
let reversed = [];
for(let i = array.length - 1; i >= 0; i--){
reversed[array.length - i] = array[i];
}
return reversed;
}
console.log(reverse(array))
you can use the two pointers approach
example
function reverseArrayTwoPointers(arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]) {
let p1 = 0;
let p2 = arr.length - 1;
while (p2 > p1) {
const temp = arr[p1];
arr[p1] = arr[p2];
arr[p2] = temp;
p1++;
p2--;
}
return arr;
}
to return [5,4,3,2,1]
example on vscode
let checkValue = ["h","a","p","p","y"]
let reverseValue = [];
checkValue.map((data, i) => {
x = checkValue.length - (i + 1);
reverseValue[x] = data;
})
function reverse(str1) {
let newstr = [];
let count = 0;
for (let i = str1.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
newstr[count] = str1[i];
count++;
}
return newstr;
}
reverse(['x','y','z']);
Array=[2,3,4,5]
for(var i=0;i<Array.length/2;i++){
var temp =Array[i];
Array[i]=Array[Array.length-i-1]
Array[Array.length-i-1]=temp
}
console.log(Array) //[5,4,3,2]

Inserting (splicing?) an Array into another Array without apply

Let's say we have two Arrays in JavaScript, [3,4,7] and [5,6].
Without sorting or using .apply, what is the best way to insert [5,6] into [3,4,7] at index 2 in order to achieve the resulting Array: [3,4,5,6,7]?
Don't know how you're defining "best way", but you can do this:
a.slice(0,2).concat(b,a.slice(2));
Unless you're saying you actually want to mutate the a Array, in which case you could do this:
var c = a.splice(2);
for (var i = 0; i < b.length + c.length; i++) {
a.push(i < b.length ? b[i] : c[i-b.length]);
}
This behavior of .splice() to split the Array in two parts may have issues in older IE that would need to be patched.
Or this would probably be better:
var c = b.concat(a.splice(2));
for (var i = 0; i < c.length; i++) {
a.push(c[i]);
}
Same caveat about .splice().
function splice(arrayOne, arrayTwo, index) {
var result = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arrayOne.length; i++) {
if (i == index) {
result = result.concat(arrayTwo);
}
result.push(arrayOne[i]);
}
return result;
}
Not really sure why you don't want to use the native methods, but here's a fairly naive solution with just loops:
function doInsert(index, items, arr) {
var insertLen = items.length,
current;
for (i = 0; i < insertLen; ++i) {
current = i + index;
arr[current + insertLen - 1] = arr[current];
arr[current] = items[i];
}
}
var arr = [3, 4, 7];
doInsert(2, [5, 6], arr);
console.log(arr);

Dynamically create index in two dimensional array

Having some trouble with this script. It iterates through a two dimensional array and adds each corresponding index together. So basically arr[0][1] + arr[0][2] + arr[0][3] ... arr[1][1] + arr[1][2] + arr[1][3] ...etc.
This first one works fine. So my logic is ok. My problem here is that I can't create the indices dynamically. I don't think a push will work since I'm summing values here.
var cat_stats_week_radar = [[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]];
for (var i = 0; i < cat_stats_week.length; i++) {
for (var j = 0; j < cat_stats_week[0].length; j++) {
cat_stats_week_radar[0][j] += +(cat_stats_week[i][j]);
}
}
This one doesn't work, I don't get an error, just a bunch of NaN values.
var cat_stats_week_radar = [[]];
for (var i = 0; i < cat_stats_week.length; i++) {
for (var j = 0; j < cat_stats_week[0].length; j++) {
cat_stats_week_radar[0][j] += +(cat_stats_week[i][j]);
}
}
Here are the arrays I'm working with.
Array to add:
var cat_stats_week = [
[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0],
[0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0],
[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0],
[0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0],
[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0],
[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0],
[0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]
];
Resulting array:
var cat_stats_week_radar = [[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0]];
You need to initialize it with the right number of zeroes:
var cat_stats_week_radar = [[]];
for (var i = 0; i < cat_stats_week[0].length; i++) {
cat_stats_week_radar[0].push(0);
}
And with Underscore.js:
_.map(_.zip.apply(null, cat_stats_week), function(a) {
return _.reduce(a, function(a, b) {
return a + b
})
});

Categories

Resources