im looking for an implementation of a card layout:
given a fixed width canvas, an arbitrary number of rectangles will be laid out, with some margins initially. fixed Y coordinate.
if the number of rectangles doesnt fit the canvas width, each rectangle will be partly overlayed by the next one. the last reactangle showing its whole width
wanted to have the layout auto adjust as I add a new rectangle
if there is such thing exist already or similar, pls share. was hoping i dont have to write it.
Like #puggsoy, I can't think of a library that does this, but here's a simple function that should do what you need.
function updateLayout(canvasWidth:Number, rects:Array, rectWidth:Number, margin:Number):void
{
var totalWidth:Number = rects.length * rectWidth + ((rects.length-1)*margin);
var offset:Number = rectWidth + margin;
if(totalWidth > canvasWidth)
{
offset = (canvasWidth - rectWidth) / (rects.length-1);
}
var currX:Number = 0;
for each(var rect:DisplayObject in rects)
{
rect.x = currX;
currX += offset;
}
}
This assumes that the DisplayObjects in the rects array are ordered by their childIndex.
Related
I'm trying to make a line graph using the canvas that looks like a typical line graph and uses typical Cartesian coordinates like we learned in algebra;
starts with 0,0 at the bottom left, and the position x-axis is to be determined by the number of items to chart.
However, the position of the points doesn't match the input (although the shape of the graph is correct, indicating I'm doing something right). What am I doing wrong?
I've rewritten and tweaked the formula for converting numerous times
function newLineGraph(parent, width, height, dataArray) {
//this makes the element using my own code, no observable error here
var canvas = newCanvas(parent, width, height);
var canvasContext = canvas.getContext("2d");
var spaceBetweenEntries = width / dataArray.length;
var largestNumber = findHighestNumber(dataArray);
canvasContext.beginPath();
canvasContext.moveTo(0, 0);
var n = 0;
while (dataArray[n]) {
var x = spaceBetweenEntries * n;
var y = height - dataArray[n];
console.log("x,y", x, y);
canvasContext.lineTo(x, y);
n++;
}
canvasContext.stroke();
return canvas;
}
edit: fixed the image so you can see the canvas size
The resulting graph is much smaller than the intended graph; for example
newLineGraph("body",55,45,[1,40,10]);
produces a graph with a small ^ shape in the corner, rather than properly starting at the bottom. However, the console logs show " 0 44" "18.333333333333332 5","36.666666666666664 35" which I believe should produce a graph that fits the whole chart nicely.
The first lineTo will always have x as 0 so I assume the first line isn't drawing like you intended. It is more like a |/\ shape instead of \/\.
Set x like this:
var x = spaceBetweenEntries * (n + 1);
Edit
As you can see in this fiddle your chart renders at the right points with the coordinates you posted. I implemented the newCanvas function like I expect it to behave. So are we missing some other code that modifies the canvas width and height?
function newCanvas(parent, width, height) {
const canvas = document.createElement('canvas');
canvas.width = width;
canvas.height = height;
document.querySelector(parent).appendChild(canvas);
return canvas;
}
The problem was using style.width and style.height to modify the canvas height, instead of canvas.height and canvas.width
I'm tinkering with a slowly-rotating geodesic sphere, and I was hoping you guys could help me make some tweaks:
https://codepen.io/anon/pen/QaYQBd
(The code is based on this: https://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/3057239)
var width = 1000,
height = 500;
var velocity = [.002, .002],
t0 = Date.now();
var projection = d3.geo.orthographic()
.scale(height / 2 - 10);
var canvas = d3.select("body").append("canvas")
.attr("width", width)
.attr("height", height);
var context = canvas.node().getContext("2d");
context.strokeStyle = "#fa0";
context.lineWidth = 0.5;
geodesic(3);
d3.timer(function() {
var time = Date.now() - t0;
projection.rotate([time * velocity[0], time * velocity[1]]);
redraw();
});
function redraw() {
context.clearRect(0, 0, width, height);
faces.forEach(function(d) {
d.polygon[0] = projection(d[0]);
d.polygon[1] = projection(d[1]);
d.polygon[2] = projection(d[2]);
});
context.beginPath();
faces.forEach(function(d) {
drawTriangle(d.polygon);
});
context.stroke();
}
function drawTriangle(triangle) {
context.moveTo(triangle[0][0], triangle[0][1]);
context.lineTo(triangle[1][0], triangle[1][1]);
context.lineTo(triangle[2][0], triangle[2][1]);
context.closePath();
}
function geodesic(n) {
faces = d3.geodesic.polygons(n).map(function(d) {
d = d.coordinates[0];
d.polygon = d3.geom.polygon(d.map(projection));
return d;
});
redraw();
}
I've been able to modify the code to get the design of the sphere closer to what I want. I'm not sure how to progress any further.
My goals:
Add dots to each vertex like this: https://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/3055104
Give the sphere a 3d perspective instead of being flat (Check out this design, which has a slider that lets you adjust the perspective: http://dmccooey.com/polyhedra/GeodesicIcosahedron3.html)
Have the stroke widths and dot sizes change relative to the perspective (this will make the whole thing have a more 3d solid look to it, instead of having the same stroke widths for every line segment)
Move the sphere to an arbitrary position within the canvas and allow the canvas size to change depending on the width of the browser window
Randomize the rotation and starting position of the sphere when the page reloads
If anyone can help me achieve any of these goals, I'd be ecstatic!
I would like to be able to click on an object, and have it zoomed to its boundingbox in the canvas viewport. How do I accomplish that? See http://jsfiddle.net/tinodb/qv989nzs/8/ for what I would like to get working.
Fabricjs' canvas has the zoomToPoint method (about which the docs say: Sets zoom level of this canvas instance, zoom centered around point), but that does not center to the given point, but it does work for zooming with scrolling. See http://jsfiddle.net/qv989nzs/
I tried several other approaches, like using canvas.setViewportTransform:
// centers a circle positioned at (200, 150)??
canvas.setViewportTransform([2, 0, 0, 2, -250, -150])
But I can't find the relation between the last two parameters to setViewportTransform and the position of the object.
(Btw, another problem is with the first example fiddle, that the zooming only works on the first click. Why is that?)
I found a way to do this, which is composed of:
canvas.setZoom(1) // reset zoom so pan actions work as expected
vpw = canvas.width / zoom
vph = canvas.height / zoom
x = (object.left - vpw / 2) // x is the location where the top left of the viewport should be
y = (object.top - vph / 2) // y idem
canvas.absolutePan({x:x, y:y})
canvas.setZoom(zoom)
See http://jsfiddle.net/tinodb/4Le8n5xd/ for a working example.
I was unable to get it to work with zoomToPoint and setViewportTransform (the latter of which does strange things, see for example http://jsfiddle.net/qv989nzs/9/ and click the blue circle; it is supposed to put the top left viewport at (25, 25), but it does not)
Here's an example of how to do it with setViewportTransform:
// first set the zoom, x, and y coordinates
var zoomLevel = 2;
var objectLeft = 250;
var objectTop = 150;
// then calculate the offset based on canvas size
var newLeft = (-objectLeft * zoomLevel) + canvas.width / 2;
var newTop = (-objectTop * zoomLevel) + canvas.height / 2;
// update the canvas viewport
canvas.setViewportTransform([zoomLevel, 0, 0, zoomLevel, newLeft, newTop]);
I'm making a game in Phaser using some large images that I want to scale down in the actual game:
create() {
//Create the sprite group and scale it down to 30%
this.pieces = this.add.group(undefined, "pieces", true);
this.pieces.scale.x = 0.3;
this.pieces.scale.y = 0.3;
//Add the players to the middle of the stage and add them to the 'pieces' group
var middle = new Phaser.Point( game.stage.width/2, game.stage.height/2);
var player_two = this.add.sprite(middle.x - 50, middle.y, 'image1', undefined, this.pieces);
var player_one = this.add.sprite(middle.x, middle.y-50, 'image2', undefined, this.pieces);
}
However because the sprites are scaled in size, their starting location is also scaled, so instead appearing in the middle of the stage, they appear only 30% of the distance to the middle.
How do I scale the sprite image without it affecting their location?
(The code is incidentally in Typescript but I think this particular sample is also javascript so that's probably irrelevant)
Set Sprite.anchor to 0.5 so the physics body is centered on the Sprite, scale the sprite image without it affecting their location.
this.image.anchor.setTo(0.5, 0.5);
Doc Phaser.Image
Anchor example
You can scale your sprite like so:
var scaleX = 2;
var scaleY = 2;
sprite.scale.set(scaleX, scaleY);
then calculate position of sprite:
var positionX = 100;
var positionY = 100;
sprite.x = positionX / scaleX;
sprite.y = positionY / scaleY;
Now your sprite is at position (100, 100).
The problem is that sprite.x got multiplied by with scaleX.
Regarding Phaser, I'd like to add that in the specific case of weapon.bullets or other groups you create yourself you're going to have to do it this way instead:
weapon.bullets.setAll('scale.x', 0.5);
weapon.bullets.setAll('scale.y', 0.5);
I got stuck on this and ended up in this thread, which is closed but in my case just not what I needed. Others will hopefully have some use out of this :)
I know how to get this height of a font:
By placing the text in a div and getting offset height of the div.
But I would like to get this actual height (Which will depend on font family):
Is that in any way possible using web based programming?
Is there a simple solution? I think the answer is no.
If you're ok with a more involved (and processor-intensive) solution, you could try this:
Render the text to a canvas, then use canvasCtx.getImageData(..) to retrieve pixel information. Next you would do something similar to what this pseudo code describes:
first_y : null
last_y : null
for each y:
for each x:
if imageData[x][y] is black:
if first_y is null:
first_y = y
last_y = y
height = last_y - first_y
This basically looks for the top (lowest y-index) of the lettering (black pixels) and the bottom (highest y-index) then subtracts to retrieve the height.
I was writing the code while Jason answered, but I decided to post it anyway:
http://jsfiddle.net/adtn8/2/
If you follow the comments you should get the idea what's going on and why. It works pretty fast and it's not so complicated as it may sound. Checked with GIMP and it is accurate.
(code to be sure it wont be lost):
// setup variables
var c = document.createElement('canvas'),
div = document.getElementsByTagName('div')[0],
out = document.getElementsByTagName('output')[0];
// set canvas's size to be equal with div
c.width = div.offsetWidth;
c.height = div.offsetHeight;
var ctx = c.getContext('2d');
// get div's font from computed style and apply it to context
ctx.font = window.getComputedStyle(div).font;
// use color other than black because all pixels are 0 when black and transparent
ctx.fillStyle = '#bbb';
// draw the text near the bottom of the canvas
ctx.fillText(div.innerText, 0, div.offsetHeight);
// loop trough the canvas' data to find first colored pixel
var data = ctx.getImageData(0, 0, c.width, c.height).data,
minY = 0, len = data.length;
for (var i = 0; i < len; i += 4) {
// when you found it
if (data[i] != 0) {
// get pixel's y position
minY = Math.floor(i / 4 / c.width);
break;
}
}
// and print out the results
out.innerText = c.height - minY + 'px';
EDIT:
I even made jQuery plugin for this: https://github.com/maciek134/jquery-textHeight
Enjoy.