I have big horizontal strip image in photoshop which is made of lots of smaller elements. The background is transparent and the strip goes from smaller elements (left) to bigger elements (right). My goal is to make this strip interactive to mouse events.
Each element is some kind of polygonal image which is trimmed left and right and then exported as a png. It is then imported into a canvas.
The problem is that I can put them side by side but since they are not rectangles I need a way to calculate the offset made up by the transparent pixels on each side of each element to make them stick together correctly... I am using KineticJs to get a precise hitarea for each element... So maybe there is a way to do it automatically with kineticjs,or there is some kind of operation I could do using each image data?
My problem illustrated:
Any ideas?
Also I am doing this simply because I would prefer precise mouseOver bounding box on each item (rather than a simple rectangle) and would rather avoid the solution to calculate each offset manually... But maybe that's not worth it?!
Ok, so you have yourself a custom shape you want to use, here is a tutorial for that: http://www.html5canvastutorials.com/kineticjs/html5-canvas-kineticjs-shape-tutorial/ , the simplest thing you can do, and even that seems fairly long, is to calculate the bounding lines for that shape. (Two somewhat vertical lines, and two somewhat horizontal lines). Then you test if the right vertical line of shape one crosses with the left vertical line of shape two, if they do, then set the coordinates of the images to be the same coordinate.
http://www.mathopenref.com/coordintersection.html
line1 = ax + b ..... line2 = cx+d //see possible tests
if(...intersection test...){ // or just test if some coordinate is left of some other coordinate
shape2.setX(shape1.getX()+shape1.getWidth()); //account for image width, so they don't overlap
shape2.setY(shape1.getY()) // no need to account for height
}
UPDATE: This is a very rough solution to the workings of the problem. The next step would be to do more fine tuning dependent on each image.
http://jsfiddle.net/9jkr7/15/
If you want precise areas, use an image map. With some clever finagling and a blank image gif you should be able to have the background you want whenever you hover over any particular area of the image map (might require javascript).
The other option I can think of would be to use SVG itself or one of the many libraries in existance to build interactive vector graphics into your page.
You could also write a function that calculates the left most, top most, right most, and bottom most pixel by looking at all of the pixels in the image data. Here's a tutorial on that:
http://www.html5canvastutorials.com/advanced/html5-canvas-get-image-data-tutorial/
Related
I'm working with svg files and some processing.js code to create a homepage.
It has some animation and static elements but the idea is to have everything the same but with different colours - Like an alternative homepage. I want this alternative to "peek" through as the mouse moves around. Only a small area around the mouse.
Does anyone have any idea how to do that?
since it isn't an image file it's a bit tricky.
I tried doing it by using the an image and the "drawing" element of processing.js thinking it could paint the alternative homepage, however it repeats the image everywhere the mouse go and what i want is for everything to remain in the same position only show the different colours in that spot.
You might consider superimposing two versions of your site, the "top" one completely covering the "bottom" one (make sure all backgrounds are opaque). Then you could try applying an SVG mask to the top page, making it transparent at a specific area and causing the bottom page to shine through. You could modify the mask as the mouse moves.
The other way round - i.e. clipping the top layer - is also thinkable.
I see the risk that this approach is slow and not consistent across browsers - you'd have to give it a try. Speed may differ depending on whether you clip/mask the top or the bottom layer.
W3C SVG Clipping, Masking and Compositing specs
MDN page on clipping and masking
MDN page on applying SVG effects to HTML content
If one version of the page can be converted to other by swapping out colors, SVG filters might be an option as well.
I have an element of given dimensions (say, 100x300 px) living in a container of the same height and variable width that I want to transform using rotateX around -webkit-transform-origin: top center; while picking the -webkit-perspective of the container so that it appears that the bottom line of the image stays where it is but only expands to fill the entire container.
Wow, that sounds confusing. Here's a picture:
So basically, I want to create a trapezoid with a fixed upper width and a variable lower width. I can't however quite figure out the math behind the relations... Javascript welcome. Following example works IF the body is 600px wide: http://jsfiddle.net/24qrQ/
Now the task is to change the perspective and rotation continuously with the body width. Any Ideas?
Okay, after a glass of wine the maths came back to me:
First, let's look at the perspective / rotation ratio. Viewed from the side, it looks like this:
The red element is rotated around its upper edge, if we project its lower edge to the lower edge of the container, the intersection between the projection line and the line perpendicular to the container at its upper edge is the required viewpoint. We get this by simple trigonometry (notice phi here is in radians, not in degree).
If we apply this, the lower edge of the element will always appear on the lower edge of the container. Now the free parameter is rotation. This seems to have the relation
rad = pi/2 - element.width / container.width
for sufficiently large widths, however I can't quite wrap my head around the actual relationship. Here is a fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/24qrQ/6/
Basically, you are trying to figure out how to put an object in 3D space, so it lines up with a 2D viewport. That's always a tricky thing.
I don't know what the math is, and most other probably don't either. This is hardly a common problem. But here's how I would go about figuring it out.
The only variable here is width. And the 2 values that would need to change based on the width is -webkit-perspective on the container and -webkit-transformon the inner element. So I would manually edit the values for a few different widths and record the 3D values that you had to enter to make things look right. (I'd use the web inspector to edit the values in realtime so you get immediate feedback)
One you have a few data points, plot them out on a graph and then try to figure out how they change. I have a hunch it's a parabolic curve, but it may but hyperbolic or sinusoidal too, my 3D math isn't good enough to know for sure.
Then you can try figure out an equation where when you input the widths you've sampled, you get back the manual 3D values you set previously. Then use JS to read the width of the container and set the CSS values to make it look right.
I've done that with 3 widths 300, 450, 600:
http://jsfiddle.net/24qrQ/3/
Some trends are obvious. As width increases, perspective goes up at an increasing reate, and rotation goes down at an increasing rate.
Figuring out the exact formula, is now up to you.
As a simpler alternative, if figuring out a formula becomes too difficult, you could manually curate a handful of widths and 3D values that look nice and store them in JS somewhere. Then you could just linearly interpolate between them. It wouldn't be exact, but it might be close enough.
It would also be less fun!
Usually when an image is being resized in javascript or css3(using background-size), it will stretch an image from the center point. I need an image to be stretched and distorted from a single point that could be anywhere. It's going to be dynamic so I don't want to resort to using separate images.
Here's a pic that illustrates what I mean:
Hopefully there's an answer out there!
You have a few options to achieve this effect.
The "correct" way would be to use canvas to draw the image: Skewing images individually using canvas
Another way would be to fake the effect using the CSS transform skew.
http://developerdrive.com/demo/skewing_elements/skewing_elements.html
You would do this inside an element with "overflow: hidden" to make it look like a background image.
It's not even clear to me what you want from the image you're linking too. Do you want it distorted or not? And is the distortion uniform?
I'm going to guess whatever you're doing can be approximated by drawing an ever decreasing set of (or maybe rectangles) clipped from the center of a some image and drawing them onto a "canvas" (think generic term not html5 term) given new coordinates for the center of each clipping. There may be a faster way to draw this than redrawing parts of the image multiple times, it's just how I visualize it possibly working.. at least maybe in some mathematical sense.
Google has the coolest effects - once it was a Pac-man game, today is apparently the 160th anniversary of the first World Fair, and Google's logo has an image of it. They also turn the mouse into a magnifying glass that can sweep over the picture (the gold ring).
I'm wondering how they do that. It's obviously Javascript, and I looked at the page source, but it's not especially readable (no surprise).
Looking at their source code, it seems they are using rather basic techniques to achieve this.
Ignoring all the embedded nifty animated gif's, there are basically two images - large, and small of the entire scene. The larger image is repeated thrice in the document. Look at the annotated image below to get a better idea of how the zoom works.
The portion inside the magnifying circle is split up in three div's - top, mid, and bottom. The overflow for each div should be hidden. Each div is relatively positioned inside the zoom circle. On mouse move, change the absolute position of the zoom circle to the mouse coordinates. Their example also uses CSS3 for the scaling and adding some animation delays.
Here's a sorta minimal reconstructed example.
Another example where we don't hide the div overflow to reveal the entire thing as a square.
Well, firstly, for anyone who wants to use such an effect, there are loads of jQuery plugins. Here are just a few:
Power Zoomer
Featured Image
Zoomer
Cloud Zoom
Secondly, it's quite easy to achieve. Just load the full-size image, but give it a width smaller than it's actual width, so it is scaled by CSS. Then, use JavaScript+CSS to create a Div (the magnifying glass) with the same image as background, but change the background-position property to the corresponding scaled x,y coordinate that the user's mouse is currently on.
There are other ways of doing it I suppose, and Google might be doing it differently, but this is the most obvious way for me that comes to mind.
Visit http://codeblab.com/glass/ for an real life example and in depth explanation of this technique. Flash and CSS v3 have ample functionality to construct a round magnifying glass.
However, simulate-a-circle-with-overlapping-rectangles works on (many) more platforms.
(DISCLOSURE: codeblab.com is my personal hobby blog with some weak links to my work in The Netherlands.)
There is a full example of magnifying any sort of HTML, including HTML5 at http://www.aplweb.co.uk/blog/js/magnifying-glass/. Works cross-browser too - although rounded corners are a bit iffy on most browsers - so you are going to have to use a box rather than circle.
Here is how to works:
Duplicate the content you want to zoom
Place the duplicated content into another element and set the visible width/height and overflow hidden
Use JavaScript to move the duplicated content so that it moves by the zoom amount * mouse movement. Also move the visible div by the mouse movement.
That is pretty much it too it. There are lots of little things to look out for though to make it work on all browsers.
I don't know how Google does it, since the logo is no longer showing in my area; but this effect can be achieved by clipping the enlarged animated GIF over the regular image using canvas. Alternatively, it is also possible to create create a circular clipping using CSS border-radius (commonly used to implement rounded corners).
EDIT: I've hacked this up together to show the basic technique that you need if you used CSS border-radius: http://jsfiddle.net/yjBuS/
Looks like they're using two images, one for the logo and one for the zoom (the zoomed one is actually sliced, to run the animations separately...?) They probably detect if the mouse is over the normal logo, then show the yellow circle and attach it to the mouse position. Then showing the other image, shifting it opposite of the mouse. Or something similar.
I'm making a canvas-based game engine and am wondering if anyone has any good info on how to achieve an overhead view perspective. What I'm looking for is somewhere halfway between the traditional birds eye view and the old SNES mode7 view. Just a slight angle to give the illusion of 3D.
I'm trying to figure out what is going to be the best way to deal with the perspective skewing. I'm not doing rotations so 3D matrix stuff would be going overboard, but I need to be able to deal with rendering the map layers at a consistent angle and it'd be nice if the angle was adjustable. I also need to deal with the depth warp. Basically, the bottom row of pixels should be 1:1 pixel width and height, then for each row it'd get, for example, 5% smaller or something like that. What I'd like is to be able to supply a large canvas as a texture and then supply a camera angle between 0 and 90 where 0 is perfectly horizontal and 90 is birds eye view.
Anyone have any related tutorials or sample code? I've searched online a bit, but everything I've found seems to either be unsuitable for use in this particular application or overly complex, doing all sorts of crazy 3D skewing and rotation stuff. All I want is to take the normal tiled grid and lean it back a bit, no rotations or complicated stuff like that.
Here's an example of what I want;
Here's an example. http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/2176/perspectivesample.jpg
The bottom pixel row is 1:1 pixel ratio, and each row above that progressively gets shorter horizontally and vertically. The source texture of the top center region is normally about half the height of the bottom center region, but it has been shrunk vertically and horizontally to fit the perspective.
What I'm thinking might work best is to render the current viewport state to another canvas in flat, birds eye view, with approximately 50% extra space on the top and sides, then slice an upside triangular region from that and draw that to the actual visible canvas.
Only problem is, I suck at math when it comes to calculating angles and such.
if i understand you right, you just want a simple trapeze transformation. if so, maybe this or this link helps you out. for images that aren't centered it would just be an additional rhomboid tranformation, wich is easily possible with canvas, as far as i know.
What you're talking about is something that can be done simply with any 3D api. However since you've decided to try to stick to 2D canvas, you have to do everything in the 2D world which means working with rectangles, rotation, scaling, skewing, etc. Also know as affine transformations as mentioned the other answer.
What you want to do is possible, but since you want to use 2D you have to think in terms of 2D functions.
Generate your initial image.
Add a slice from the bottom of the original image to the bottom of the canvas, very slightly positioned to the left so the center of the image matches up with the center of the current canvas.
Very slightly increase the scale of the entire image
Repeat until you get to the top of the image.
The Pseudo code would look like this...
imgA = document.getElementById('source');
// grab image slices from bottom to top of image
for (var ix=height-slice_height;ix>=0;ix-=slice_height)
{
// move a section of the source image to the target canvas
ctx.drawImage(imgA, 0,ix,width,slice_height,
0-half_slice_width_increase,width,slice_height);
// stretch the whole canvas
ctx.scale(scale_ratio, 1);
}
This will take lots of tweaking, but that is the general solution.
scale_ratio will be a number slightly larger, but very close to 1.
ctx is the standard canvas 2D context
half_slice_width_increase is the 1/2 the amount the canvas will grow when scaled by the scale ratio. This keeps the scaled image centered.
To look correct you would want to transform the background tiles first before you add the icon overlays.