I want to move a widget around on the canvas, and for various reasons I don't want to use sprites. I'm using the latest version of Chrome. In order to move the widget, I 'undraw' it and then redraw it in another place. By 'undraw', I mean that I just draw the same image in the same place, but draw it with the same color as the background, so the widget disappears completely before I draw the new one. The problem is that when I 'undraw', traces of the original image remain on the canvas. I've poked around on related questions here and haven't found anything that helps. I understand the problem of drawing a one-pixel line and getting anti-aliasing, so I set my line width to 2 (and various other non-integer values), but to no avail. Anyone have any ideas? Here's a fiddle demo, and here's the function that does the update:
function draw(){
if(previousX !== null) {
ctx.lineWidth = 1;
ctx.fillStyle = '#ffffff';
ctx.strokeStyle = '#ffffff';
drawCircle(previousX, previousY, 20);
}
ctx.lineWidth = 1;
ctx.fillStyle = '#000000';
ctx.strokeStyle = '#000000';
drawCircle(x, y, 20);
console.log('drew circle (' + x + ', ' + y + ')');
previousX = x;
previousY = y;
}
P.S. I'm just a hobbyist with no great experience in graphics, so please dumb-down your answer a bit if possible.
When your draw a shape with anti-aliasing, you are doing a solid covering of some pixels, but only a partial covering of the edge pixels. The trouble is that pixels (temporarily ignoring LCD panels) are indivisible units. So how do we partially cover pixels? We achieve this using the alpha channel.
The alpha channel (and alpha blending) combines the colour at the edge of a circle with the colour underneath it. This happens when the circle only partially covers the pixel. Here's a quick diagram to visualise this issue.
The mixing of colours causes a permanent change that is not undone by drawing the circle again in the background colour. The reason: colour mixing happens again, but that just causes the effect to soften.
In short, redrawing only covers up the pixels with total coverage. The edge pixels are not completely part of the circle, so you cannot cover up the edge effects.
If you need to erase the circle, rather think about it in terms of restoring what was originally there. You can probably copy the original content, then draw the circle, then when you want to move the circle, restore the original content and repeat the process.
This previous SO question may give you some ideas about copying canvas regions. It uses the drawImage method. The best solution would combine the getImageData and putImageData methods. I have modified your Fiddle example to show you how you might do this. You could try the following code:
var x, y, vx, vy;
var previousX = null, previousY = null;
var data = null;
function draw(){
ctx.lineWidth = 2.5;
ctx.fillStyle = '#000000';
ctx.strokeStyle = '#FF0000';
drawCircle(x, y, 20);
previousX = x;
previousY = y;
}
function drawCircle(x, y, r){
// Step 3: Replace the stuff that was underneath the previous circle
if (data != null)
{
ctx.putImageData(data, previousX - r-5, previousY - r-5);
}
// Step 1: Copy the region in which we intend to draw a circle
data = ctx.getImageData(x - r-5, y - r-5, 2 * r + 10, 2 * r + 10);
// Step 2: Draw the circle
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(x, y, r, 0, Math.PI*2, true);
ctx.closePath();
ctx.stroke();
ctx.fill();
}
Related
I have a canvas which is filled with the webcam stream.
On top of that, I want to have rectangles (just the borders of a rectangle) appear for 1 second at random areas. So every second a rectangle will pop up, and the next it will be somewhere else.
Currently, rectangles are appearing every second but the last doesn't disappear. Therefore, on the 2nd second there are 2 rectangle, 3rd second 3 rectangles, etc...
I need to find a way to either have the rectangle appear for 1 second, have it removed after 1 second, or have it moved after 1 second: results are the same for me.
let sx; // x axis
let sy; // y axis
let i = setInterval( axisChanger, 1000 ); // pops up every second
function axisChanger() {
sx = getRandomInt(0, 535); // gets a random num
sy = getRandomInt(0, 445); // gets a random num
}
requestAnimationFrame(animate);
function animate(t) {
requestAnimationFrame(animate);
randomRect();
}
function randomRect() {
ctx.rect(sx, sy, 50, 30); // these 4 lines make a hollow rectangle: border only.
ctx.lineWidth = 2;
ctx.strokeStyle = '#FF0000';
ctx.stroke();
}
If I use clearRect(), then the inside of the rectangle will also be gone... and so part of the webcam stream with it.
If you only need to draw a single rectangle, replace rect() and stroke() with strokeRect():
function randomRect() {
ctx.lineWidth = 2;
ctx.strokeStyle = '#FF0000';
ctx.strokeRect(sx, sy, 50, 50);
}
The reason for the current behavior is that rect() adds to the main path and accumulates all rect() calls. Because of that the path must be cleared using beginPath().
But since you are only using a single rectangle you can simply use strokeRect() which does not add anything to the path but renders directly.
The alternative however, would be:
function randomRect() {
ctx.beginPath(); // clear path and sub-paths
ctx.rect(sx, sy, 50, 30); // these 4 lines make a hollow rectangle: border only.
ctx.lineWidth = 2;
ctx.strokeStyle = '#FF0000';
ctx.stroke();
}
I'm finishing a project, but I have one more step to finish.
I want to visualize microphone input by a canvas.
Getting the data from the microphone isn't a problem.
But I want to visualize it in a special way. (see image)
I want to animate each element from the wave.
My problem isn't the animation.
My problem is to create those shapes in the CANVAS.
This is an example of one shape:
I can create a rounded corner shape with the canvas
const draw = () => {
fillRoundedRect(20, 20, 100, 100, 20);
ctx.fillStyle = "red";
ctx.fill();
};
const fillRoundedRect = (x, y, w, h, r) => {
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(x+r, y);
ctx.lineTo(x+w-r, y);
ctx.quadraticCurveTo(x+w, y, x+w, y+r);
ctx.lineTo(x+w, y+h-r);
ctx.quadraticCurveTo(x+w, y+h, x+w-r, y+h);
ctx.lineTo(x+r, y+h);
ctx.quadraticCurveTo(x, y+h, x, y+h-r);
ctx.lineTo(x, y+r);
ctx.quadraticCurveTo(x, y, x+r, y);
ctx.fill();
};
Can someone help me with creating a shape like in the second image?
Thanks in advance guys!
Instead of trying to make a single shape with dependency on surrounding shapes and a high risk of headache math-wise, use instead two shapes which you merge using composition. My suggestion anyways.
Draw all the bars in full height using composition mode source-over (default)
Define a single shape on top using some sort of spline (I would suggest a cardinal spline).
Set composition mode to destination-out and render an enclosed shape using the spline as top "line".
Example
This should work in a loop (remember to clear canvas for each frame) but shows only the building stones needed here -
var ctx = c.getContext("2d");
var points = [];
var skippy = 0;
// render all bars
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "source-over"; // not needed here, but in a loop yes!
// produce bars
ctx.beginPath(); // not needed here, but in a loop yes!
for(var x = 0; x < c.width; x += 30) {
ctx.rect(x, 0, 16, c.height)
// OKIDOKI, lets produce the spline using random points (y) as well
// but not for all, only every second for prettyness... modify to taste
if (skippy++ % 2 === 0) points.push(x, c.height * Math.random());
}
points.push(c.width, c.height * Math.random()); // one last
ctx.fillStyle = "rgb(198, 198, 198)";
ctx.fill();
// render spline
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(0, c.height); // bottom left corner
curve(ctx, points); // spline
ctx.lineTo(c.width, c.height); // bottom right corner
ctx.closePath();
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "destination-out";
ctx.fill();
I am drawing onto an HTML5 canvas with stroke() and regardless of how or when I set globalAlpha, the stroke is being drawn with some measure of transparency. I'd like for the stroke to be completely opaque (globalAlpha=1). Is there somewhere else where the alpha is being set?
In this jsfiddle, I am drawing a grid of solid black lines onto a canvas. For me, the result shows dots at the intersections, confirming that the lines are partially transparent. Here's the gist of it:
context.globalAlpha=1;
context.strokeStyle="#000";
context.beginPath();
/* draw the grid */
context.stroke();
context.closePath;
The especially weird thing (to me) is that this problem was not occurring in my code before my last computer restart, so I'm guessing there was something hanging around in the cache that was keeping the alpha at my desired level.
I'm obviously missing something here... thanks for any help you can provide.
Real answer :
Each point in a canvas has its center in its (+0.5, +0.5) coordinate.
So to avoid artifacts, start by translating the context by (0.5, 0.5) ,
then round the coordinates.
css scaling creates artifact, deal only with canvas width and height, unless
you want to deal with hidpi devices with webGL, or render at a lower resolution
with both webGL and context2D.
-> in your case, your setup code would be (with NO css width/height set ) :
( http://jsfiddle.net/gamealchemist/x9bTX/8/ )
// parameters
var canvasHorizontalRatio = 0.9;
var canvasHeight = 300;
var hCenterCanvas = true;
// setup
var canvasWidth = Math.floor(window.innerWidth * canvasHorizontalRatio);
var cnv = document.getElementById("myCanvas");
cnv.width = canvasWidth;
cnv.height = canvasHeight;
if (hCenterCanvas)
cnv.style['margin-left'] = Math.floor((window.innerWidth - canvasWidth) * 0.5) + 'px';
var ctx = cnv.getContext("2d");
ctx.translate(0.5, 0.5);
gridContext();
The rest of the code is the same as your original code, i just changed the size of you squares to get quite the same visual aspect.
ctx.beginPath();
for (var i=60; i<canvasHeight; i+=60) {
ctx.moveTo(0,i);
ctx.lineTo(canvasWidth,i);
}
for (i=60; i<canvasWidth; i+=60) {
ctx.moveTo(i,0);
ctx.lineTo(i,canvasHeight);
}
ctx.strokeStyle="#000";
ctx.stroke();
ctx.closePath();
With those changes we go from :
to :
Edit : to ensure rounding, in fact i think most convenient is to inject the context and change moveTo, lineTo :
function gridContext() {
var oldMoveTo = CanvasRenderingContext2D.prototype.moveTo;
CanvasRenderingContext2D.prototype.moveTo = function (x,y) {
x |= 0; y |= 0;
oldMoveTo.call(this, x, y);
}
var oldLineTo = CanvasRenderingContext2D.prototype.lineTo;
CanvasRenderingContext2D.prototype.lineTo = function (x,y) {
x |= 0; y |= 0;
oldLineTo.call(this, x, y);
}
}
Obviously, you must do this for all drawing functions you need.
When drawing lines on a canvas, the line itself is exactly on the pixel grid. But because the line is one pixel wide, half of it appears in each of the pixels to either side of the grid, resulting in antialising and a line that is basically 50% transparent over two pixels.
Instead, offset your line by 0.5 pixels. This will cause it to appear exactly within the pixel.
Demo
I want to place a number of light sources on a background for a game I'm making, which works great with one light source as shown below:
This is achieved by placing a .png image above everything else that becomes more transperant towards the center, like this:
Works great for one light source, but I need another approach where I can add more and move the light sources around.
I have considered drawing a similar "shadow layer" pixel by pixel for each frame, and calculate the transparency depending of the distance to each light source. However, that would probably be very slow and I'm sure there are way better solutions to this problem.
The images are just examples and each frame will have considerably more content to move around and update using requestAnimationFrame.
Is there a light weight and simple way to achieve this? Thanks in advance!
Edit
With the help of ViliusL, I came up with this masking solution:
http://jsfiddle.net/CuC5w/1/
// Create canvas
var canvas = document.createElement('canvas');
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
canvas.width = 300;
canvas.height = 300;
document.body.appendChild(canvas);
// Draw background
var img=document.getElementById("cat");
ctx.drawImage(img,0,0);
// Create shadow canvas
var shadowCanvas = document.createElement('canvas');
var shadowCtx = shadowCanvas.getContext('2d');
shadowCanvas.width = canvas.width;
shadowCanvas.height = canvas.height;
document.body.appendChild(shadowCanvas);
// Make it black
shadowCtx.fillStyle= '#000';
shadowCtx.fillRect(0,0,canvas.width,canvas.height);
// Turn canvas into mask
shadowCtx.globalCompositeOperation = "destination-out";
// RadialGradient as light source #1
gradient = shadowCtx.createRadialGradient(80, 150, 0, 80, 150, 50);
gradient.addColorStop(0, "rgba(255, 255, 255, 1.0)");
gradient.addColorStop(1, "rgba(255, 255, 255, .1)");
shadowCtx.fillStyle = gradient;
shadowCtx.fillRect(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
// RadialGradient as light source #2
gradient = shadowCtx.createRadialGradient(220, 150, 0, 220, 150, 50);
gradient.addColorStop(0, "rgba(255, 255, 255, 1.0)");
gradient.addColorStop(1, "rgba(255, 255, 255, .1)");
shadowCtx.fillStyle = gradient;
shadowCtx.fillRect(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
Another way to play with light is to use the globalCompositeOperation mode 'ligther' to ligthen things, and just use globalAlpha to darken things.
First here's an image, with a cartoon lightening on the left, and a more realistic lightening on the right, but you'd rather watch the fiddle, since it's animated :
http://jsfiddle.net/gamealchemist/ABfVj/
So how i did things :
To darken :
- Choose a darkening color( most likely black, but you can choose a red or another color to teint the result).
- choose an opacity ( 0.3 seems a good start value ).
- fillRect the area you want to darken.
function darken(x, y, w, h, darkenColor, amount) {
ctx.fillStyle = darkenColor;
ctx.globalAlpha = amount;
ctx.fillRect(x, y, w, h);
ctx.globalAlpha = 1;
}
To lighten :
- Choose a lightening color. Beware that this color's r,g,b will be added to the previous point's r,g,b : if you use a high value your color will get burnt.
- change the globalCompositeOperation to 'lighter'
- you might change opacity also, to have more control over the lightening.
- fillRect or arc the area you want to lighten.
If you draw several circles while in lighter mode, the results will add up, so you can choose a quite low value and draw several circles.
function ligthen(x, y, radius, color) {
ctx.save();
var rnd = 0.03 * Math.sin(1.1 * Date.now() / 1000);
radius = radius * (1 + rnd);
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = 'lighter';
ctx.fillStyle = '#0B0B00';
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(x, y, radius, 0, 2 * π);
ctx.fill();
ctx.fillStyle = color;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(x, y, radius * 0.90+rnd, 0, 2 * π);
ctx.fill();
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(x, y, radius * 0.4+rnd, 0, 2 * π);
ctx.fill();
ctx.restore();
}
Notice that i added a sinusoidal variation to make the light more living.
Ligthen : another way :
You can also, while still using the 'ligther' mode, use a gradient to have a smoother effect (first one is more cartoon like, unless you draw a lot of circles.).
function ligthenGradient(x, y, radius) {
ctx.save();
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = 'lighter';
var rnd = 0.05 * Math.sin(1.1 * Date.now() / 1000);
radius = radius * (1 + rnd);
var radialGradient = ctx.createRadialGradient(x, y, 0, x, y, radius);
radialGradient.addColorStop(0.0, '#BB9');
radialGradient.addColorStop(0.2 + rnd, '#AA8');
radialGradient.addColorStop(0.7 + rnd, '#330');
radialGradient.addColorStop(0.90, '#110');
radialGradient.addColorStop(1, '#000');
ctx.fillStyle = radialGradient;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(x, y, radius, 0, 2 * π);
ctx.fill();
ctx.restore();
}
i also added here a sin variation.
Rq : creating a gradient on each draw will create garbage : store the gradient if you use a single gradient, and store them in an array if you want to animate the gradients.
If you are using the same light in several places, have a single gradient built, centered on (0,0), and translate the canvas before drawing always with this single gradient.
Rq 2 : you can use clipping to prevent some parts of the screen to be lightened (if there's an obstacle).
I added the blue circle on my example to show this.
So you might want to ligthen directly your scene with those effects, or create separately a light layer that you darken/lighten as you want before drawImage it on the screen.
There are too many scenari to discuss them here (light animated or not, clipping or not, pre-compute a light layer or not, ...) but as far as speed is concerned, for Safari and iOS safari, the solution using rect/arc draws -either with gradient or a solid fill- will be rocket faster than drawing an image/canvas.
On Chrome it will be quite the opposite : it's faster to draw an image than to draw each geometry when the geometry count raises.
Firefox is rather similar to Chrome for this.
your png should have full transparent corners and not transparent white in middle.
or you can draw this, but not pixel by pixel like here jsfiddle.net/pr9r7/2/
More examples: jsfiddle.net/pr9r7/3/ http://codepen.io/cwolves/pen/prvnb
Here is my Take on it:
A. Don't worry about performance until you have tried it out. The Canvas is pretty darn fast at drawing.
B. Rather than having a image with dark Corners and a Transparent middle. Why don't you try and make it more "IRL" and have the overall world be more Dark and let the light-source illuminate the Area? Highlight a small area, instead of darken everything EXCEPT a small Area.
How can I fill the path that I've drawn in red?
http://jsfiddle.net/MVXZu/1/
I've tried to use fill but it doesn't fill my path as I want it to - that is to fill in the red outline - but instead it fills only a diagonal portion (comment out the ctx.fill(); to see the full outline I want to fill) The code that's drawing the line is this:
//loop through the data
ctx.beginPath();
for (var i = 0; i < data.length; i++) {
ctx.lineWidth=3;
ctx.lineCap = 'round';
ctx.strokeStyle = 'red';
ctx.moveTo(linePosX,linePosY);
ctx.lineTo((i*cellWidth) + cellWidth + padding,(tableHeight + padding) - data[i].v);
linePosX = i*cellWidth + padding + cellWidth;
linePosY = (tableHeight + padding) - data[i].v;
if(i == 13) {
ctx.lineTo(linePosX,tableHeight+padding);
ctx.lineTo(padding,tableHeight+padding);
}
ctx.fillStyle="red";
ctx.fill();
ctx.stroke();
ctx.closePath();
}
Don't put the beginPath into the loop
Don't use moveTo, as that creates a new polygon to fill (see it here, as the result of closePath()). You're at the correct position after the before lineTo anyway. Without it it works better…
Here's the fixed fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/MVXZu/3/
Pseudo-code:
ctx.beginPath();
// set ctx styles
ctx.moveTo( bottom-left corner );
for each (point in data) {
ctx.lineTo(point);
}
ctx.lineTo( bottom-right corner );
ctx.closePath(); // automatically moves back to bottom left corner
ctx.fill();
Hopefully this is what you were wanting: http://jsfiddle.net/MVXZu/2/
Because you were only running some of the code if (i == 13) {}, only the moveTo and the first lineTo were getting called. This was resulting in a line at the top of the section, but not a box to fill.
I moved a lot of the drawing outside of the loop. It creates the first point in the bottom left of the graph, then the points along the top, then the point in the bottom right. Then it fills in the whole graph after the path is finished.