(function($) {
$.fn.extend({
clock: function(options) {
var options = $.extend(defaults, options);
.......
.......
return this.each(function() {
var prev = function() {
console.log("hello world!");
alert('getweather');
};
$('#left').click(function() {alert(342);});
});
})(jQuery);
how to call the plugin functions prev and $('#left') from below code
$.fn.clock().prev(); //doesn't work
$.fn.clock('#left'); //doesn't work
thanks in advance
You cannot, based on the code provided. It is impossible. The function is assigned to the local variable prev, which is not being exposed outside the local scope in any way.
If you want to make it accessible, you need to store the function somewhere such that it won't go out of scope, and then provide some interface, typically via something like $('my-element').clock('prev'). jQuery Plugin Authoring explains best practices for exactly this, specifically under Plugin Methods.
Those are anonymous functions. Even if they were within your scope, you wouldn't be able to call them.
A workaround would be to trigger a click event on #left:
$('#left').trigger('click');
Related
new to writing a function in jquery, just testing the waters.
I have this just to to demo:
(function ( $ ) {
$.fn.update_notifications = function( options ) {
// This is the easiest way to have default options.
var settings = $.extend({
// These are the defaults.
user_id: 0,
}, options );
alert('test');
};
}( jQuery ));
Which I include in a JS file included before the tag. What I want to know, is how to actually call it inside my html?
I was thinking something like:
<script type="text/javascript">
jQuery.update_notifications({
user_id: 1
});
</script>
But that tells me "jQuery.update_notifications is not a function"
You want to call it on selected element like this:
$("some_element").update_notifications();
You can find more here at the official documentation.
No, the function is not part of the jquery object, but of its fn child object
$.fn.update_notifications();
However, it doesnt make sense to add something to the jquery prototype if youre not doing sth jqueryobjectbased
To fix the issue you simply need to change $.fn.update_notifications to $.update_notifications. The $.fn namespace is used for attaching functions to instances of jQuery objects.
(function($) {
$.update_notifications = function(options) {
var settings = $.extend({
user_id: 0,
}, options);
console.log('test');
};
}(jQuery));
jQuery.update_notifications({
user_id: 1
});
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
That being said, your example is a little redundant as you've just wrapped the existing $.extend() function without adding any real logic - although I assume this is a work in progress.
If your function has nothing to do with any DOM elements, i would suggest you not to pollute jQuery. You can very well declare this function some where else (page, separate JS file etc.).
But if you still want to do this, you can try these
$.update_notifications();
or
$(window).update_notifications();
or
$(document).update_notifications();
Why are you exactly extending the Jquery object?
Usually, lacking a valid reason to do so you would simply write a function inside your script.
Let's assume you have a valid reason and proceed:
Once you bind your function to $ or better create object like $.custom and bind the function (and rest of custom things you wanna bind to Jquery) you can use it like a normal function - only prefix it with $.custom
Not sure I understand your question but are you searching how to run that function from HTML other than using jquery?
Are you asking for an example like this?
<p id="onThis" onclick="$.custom.yourFunctionName()">Click me.</p>
That is obtrusive JS code and is not best practice when dealing with Jquery.
You wanna bind that function to element with on or click handler when document is ready:
$(document).ready( function() {
$('#onThis').on('click', function here);
// OR //
$('#onThis').click(function here);
});
If there is no reason to bind it to jQuery, don't do it you are only implying to someone reading your code something that doesn't exist ;)
I am currently developing a rather complex jQuery plugin. One that I am designing to be extensible. The quandary I have is how to exactly provide my users with the APIs available to them.
There are two methods that I can come up with:
Provide the API via an object in the global scope
This is the method I am currently using. I do it similar to this:
(function ($, win, undefined) {
//main plugin functionality
function pluginStuff() { /*...including method calling logic...*/ }
//register function with jQuery
$.fn.extend({ Plugin: pluginStuff });
//register global API variable
win.PluginAPI = { extendMe: {}, getVar: function() {} };
})(jQuery, window);
Unfortunately since I impliment the standard $().plugin('method') architecture its a little strange to have to use the jQuery method for some things and the API variable for others.
Provide the API via an object placed in jQuery
I toyed with this method as well but its best practice to take up only a single slot in jQueries fn scope, as not to crowd the jQuery variable. In this method I would put my api variable in $.fn instead of the window:
//register function with jQuery
$.fn.extend({ Plugin: pluginStuff });
//register global API variable
$.fn.PluginAPI = { extendMe: {}, getVar: function() {} };
I would rather not break this convention and take up two places.
Now that I write this I can see a third option where I assign my plugins slot in jQuery's fn scope to be an object:
$.fn.Plugin = { plugin: pluginStuff, api: { extendMe: {}, getVar: function() {} } };
but how well received would this be if users had to do $('#elm').Plugin.plugin({ setting: 'value' }) to create a new instance of the plugin?
Any help or pointers would be greatly appreciated.
Please Note: I'm am not looking for a way to incorporate the API object into my plugin functionality. I am looking for a way to keep it separately modularized, but intuitively available for use/extension.
You could always do like
var plugin = function plugin() { /* do the main stuff */ };
// api stuff here
plugin.getVar = function() { };
plugin.extendMe = {};
$.fn.Plugin = plugin;
Or stick the extra stuff in an object that you assign to plugin.api.
Any way you do it, though, you're going to have to worry a bit about settings bleeding into each other. Since everything's going to be using the same function, regardless of how you choose to set it up, you'll need a way to keep invocations of the plugin separate from one another. Perhaps using something like, say, this.selector (in your plugin function) as a key into an associative array of properties, for example. I'd normally recommend .data() to attach settings to individual elements, but that doesn't help much if the same element gets the plugin called for it twice.
The method I eventually decided to use was registering the plugin under the fn namespace and the api variable under the jQuery $ namespace. Since methods and options set operate on an instance of the plugin $.fn is the best choice.
However, the API is global and does not link to a single instance. In this case $.fn doesn't quite fit. What I ended up using was something similar to this:
(function ($, win, undefined) {
//main plugin functionality
function pluginStuff() { /*...including method calling logic...*/ }
//register function with jQuery
$.fn.Plugin = pluginStuff;
//register global API variable
$.Plugin = { extendMe: {}, getVar: function() {} };
})(jQuery, window);
now you can create an use a plugin object as expected:
$('#elm').Plugin();
$('#elm').Plugin('option', 'something', 'value');
$('#elm').Plugin('method');
and you can easily extend and access the API:
$.extend($.Plugin.extendMe, {
moreStuff: {}
});
$.Plugin.getVar('var');
Thanks for the help everyone!
I'm writing my first jquery plugin and wondered what the correct/best practice way of referencing another function from within a plugin was? Is there a better way to define bar in my plugin script. Should it be within function($) ? I'd also like it to be available to other plugins within the script.
function bar() {
return 'is this best paractice?';
}
(function($) {
$.fn.foo = function() {
alert(bar());
};
}(jQuery));
Why doesn't something like this work:
(function($) {
$.fn.bar = function() {
return 'is this best paractice?';
};
}(jQuery));
(function($) {
$.fn.foo = function() {
alert(bar());
};
}(jQuery));
Thanks
Functions added to $.fn will be used as jQuery plugins. If you just want to provide a global function from your plugin you add it to $ directly (e.g. $.bar = function() ...).
If you just want use the function internally for your plugin put it within function($). That way you make it available only in that scope (the anonymous function) and not everywhere.
I'm ("still", for those who read my previous posts) working on an ICEFaces web application.
This question can be interpreted as general Javascript question, so read on if you don't know much about ICEFaces
I need to extend the behaviour of the classes created by ICEFaces Javascript framework, in particular ToolTipPanelPopup.
I cannot modify the source code of the library (otherwise I would have achieved my goal).
This is how ICEFaces defines the class (much like jQuery and other Javascript frameworks).
ToolTipPanelPopup = Class.create({
[...]
showPopup: function() {
[...]
},
updateCordinate: function(event) {
[...]
},
[...]
});
My question is very simple
How do I extend the behaviour of showPopup() function in order to run my custom function at the end of it?
I mean something like following Java example code that supposes inheritance
public void ShowPopup()
{
super.ShowPopup();
customMethod();
}
Something like this should work:
var original = ToolTipPanel.showPopup;
ToolTipPanel.showPopup = function() {
original(); //this is kind of like the call to super.showPopup()
//your code
};
I tried out this trivial example in Firebug, and it seems to work:
var obj = {
func: function() {
console.log("foo");
}
};
obj.func();
var original = obj.func;
obj.func = function() {
original();
console.log("bar");
};
obj.func();
Firebug output:
foo
foo
bar
So what's happening here is that you're saving a reference to the original showPopup function. Then you're creating a closure and assigning it back to showPopup. The original showPopup is not lost, because you still have a reference to it in original. In the closure, you call the function that original references, and then you have your own code. Just swap around the order if you want to do something first before you call original. Since you're using a closure, original is lexically bound to the current scope and should be available every time the new showPopup is called (if I'm wrong about this, someone please correct me).
Let me know if this works out for you.
I like to organize my javascript in namespace style like below. What I want to know : is there another (shorter?) way to call myFirstFunction() from mySecondFunction()? I tried this.myFirstFunction() and it's not working so maybe there's some kind of mysterious trick here that I don't know.
var myNameSpace = {
myFirstFunction: function(){
alert("Hello World!");
},
mySecondFunction: function(){
myNameSpace.myFirstFunction();
}
}
Thanks for your help as usual, people of SO! :)
As written in your example code, this.myFirstFunction() would work. Your code is likely simplified to illustrate your problem, so it would probably help to see the actual code to tell why it doesn't work with this.
One possible reason that it fails would be if the code where you call this.myFirstFunction() is inside a closure. If so, this would be a reference to the closing function, not your namespace and would therefore fail. See here for a contrived example based on your code to see what I mean. Again, having a look at the actual code would probably be helpful to diagnose what's going on.
Your suggestion to use 'this' should work. i.e.:
var myNameSpace = {
myFirstFunction: function(){
alert("Hello World!");
},
mySecondFunction: function(){
this.myFirstFunction();
}
}
Result:
myNameSpace.mySecondFunction() // "Hello World!".
If you want it to be shorter maybe you should consider the following pattern:
Javascript Design Pattern Suggestion
basically for your example:
var myNameSpace = (function()
{
function _myFirstFunction(){
alert("Hello World!");
}
function _mySecondFunction(){
_myFirstFunction();
}
return {
MyFirstFunction : _myFirstFunction,
MySecondFunction : _mySecondFunction
};
})();
I find this to be the cleanest pattern, also providing "private/public" variables in javascript that's otherwise pretty much impossible
In some cases the this keyword should work fine. If you explicitly call myNameSpace.mySecondFunction() then this.myFirstFunction() will execute as intended.
If you are using myNameSpace.mySecondFunction as an event handler it likely will not. In the case of an event handler you would need some way to refer to the namespace you want to use. A lot of JavaScript frameworks provide a way to define what the this keyword refers to. For example, in MooTools you can do myNameSpace.mySecondFunction.bind(myNameSpace) which will cause this to refer to myNameSpace inside mySecondFunction. If you are not using a framework you could make your event handler an anonymous function like:
document.getElementById('myId').addEventListener('click', function(e) {
myNameSpace.mySecondFunction.call(myNameSpace);
});
For more information on the call method I would refer to the MDC page for the call function or you could use apply which behaves similarly to call but passing an array of arguments for the second paramter rather than having a varargs like approach for additional parameters.
All of these suggestions are predicated on defining your namespace as #Harnish suggested:
var myNameSpace = {
myFirstFunction: function(){
alert("Hello World!");
},
mySecondFunction: function(){
this.myFirstFunction();
}
}
For more information about JavaScript function binding I'd highly suggest reading Justin's article on Function scope and binding in JavaScript
If you are attaching to event:
possible issue could be if you are attaching Namespace's function to event, like:
$(el).on("click", nameSpace.myFunc);
....
nameSpace = {
myFunc: function(){
this.anotherFunc();
}
}
that will throw error.
Solution 1
You may change this.anotherFunc() with nameSpace.anotherFunc()
Solution 2
You might change
$(el).on("click", nameSpace.myFunc);
// to ----->
$(el).on("click", function(){ nameSpace.myFunc(); } );