I am doing some research at the moment into creating a new maths game for primary school children where divs from 0-9 appear at random inside a container.
A question is given at the beginning. Something like, multiples of 20. The user will then have to click on the correct ones, and they will then be counted at the end and a score will be given.
I have just changed the speed in which the divs appear so that they appear for longer and more than one at a time to make the game easier for younger children.
I used "fadeIn" like so..
$('#' + id).animate({
top: newY,
left: newX
}, 'slow', function() {}).fadeIn(2000);
}
My problem is that now when I shoot the correct or incorrect number the animation is very glitchy and I cannot figure out why.
Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/cFKHq/6/ (See version 5 to see what it was like before)
Inside startplay(), control the concurrency when calling scramble() , I do it with a global var named window.cont, so I replaced your following call:
play = setInterval(scramble, 1800);
for this one:
play = setInterval(function() {
if (window.cont){
window.cont = false;
scramble();
}
}, 1000);
The var window.cont needs to be set globally at the start of your code, like so:
var miss = 0;
var hit = 0;
var target = $("#target");
window.cont = true;
So with window.cont you now can control that animations are executed one after another, without overlapping, like so:
$('#'+id).css({
top: newY,
left: newX
}).fadeIn(2000, function() {
setTimeout(function() {
$('#' + id).slideUp('fast');
window.cont = true;
}, 1500);
});
See working demo
Related
I'm currently using the following javascript as shown below.
It's working well when I place just text within the div .image_scroll_3 but as soon as I insert images the scroll glitches and won't move past the top of the image.
Any advice would be much appreciated
JS
<script>
(function($, undefined) {
$.fn.loopScroll = function(p_options) {
var options = $.extend({
direction: "upwards",
speed: 60
}, p_options);
return this.each(function() {
var obj = $(this).find(".image_scroll_2");
var text_height = obj.find(".image_scroll_3").height();
var start_y, end_y;
if (options.direction == "downwards") {
start_y = -text_height;
end_y = 0;
} else if (options.direction == "upwards") {
start_y = 0;
end_y = -text_height;
}
var animate = function() {
// setup animation of specified block "obj"
// calculate distance of animation
var distance = Math.abs(end_y - parseInt(obj.css("top")));
//alert("animate " + obj.css("top") + "-> " + end_y + " " + distance);
//duration will be distance / speed
obj.animate(
{ top: end_y }, //scroll upwards
1500 * distance / options.speed,
"linear",
function() {
// scroll to start position
obj.css("top", start_y);
animate();
}
);
};
obj.find(".image_scroll_3").clone().appendTo(obj);
$(this).on("mouseout", function() {
obj.stop();
}).on("mouseout", function() {
animate(); // resume animation
});
obj.css("top", start_y);
animate(); // start animation
});
};
}(jQuery));
$("#example4").loopScroll({ speed: 700 });
</script>
I think the problem is that your text_height is calculated before the images are actually loaded inside your .image_scroll_3 elements. So you'll need to wait for the images to load.
Put your loopScroll call inside a $(window).load like so:
$(window).load(function(){
$('#example4').loopScroll({speed:700});
});
That massive glitch should now be gone as the fix above should have helped mitigate it.
However, there is still some unwanted jank / stutter (don't want to use the word glitch again, lets keep it reserved for the initial problem) in movement of all images if you notice and I am guessing that is probably because we are animating the whole thing too fast. Passing in speed like 100 or 200 resolves that but this is not really a solution because, ideally, you should be able to put in any speed value and it should just produce smooth animations out of it.
I am working on exactly the same thing but before that, I want to know if the above fix for the glitch helps you and we are finally done with it? Let me know.
Update:
Here is my version that I spoke of earlier, for your perusal.
Because all you are trying to do is loop images in a very linear fashion, I, for one, do not see the need to rely on animate() function of jQuery. There is requestAnimationFrame API that I have leveraged instead. In fact, in my demonstration below I have completely abandoned jQuery in favour of vanilla JavaScript only because I kept finding alternatives to pretty much everything we needed to do in this demo. But of course, this is also a very subjective matter; a taste thing; so if you want to go with jQuery, then by all means.
Another fundamental change I brought is rather than updating top values, I have resorted to updating translateY values.
Take a look at this jsFiddle and let me know if it fits your needs.
JavaScript code of which is as belows:
// [http://www.paulirish.com/2011/requestanimationframe-for-smart-animating/]
window.requestAnimFrame=(function(){return window.requestAnimationFrame||window.webkitRequestAnimationFrame||window.mozRequestAnimationFrame||function(callback){window.setTimeout(callback,1000/60);};})();
var main=null;
var imageScroll2=null;
var imageScroll3=null;
var totalHeight=null;
var initY=null;
var destY=null;
var currY=null;
var increment=null;
var direction=null;
var UP=null;
var DOWN=null;
var isPlaying=null;
function init(){
main=document.getElementById('example4');
imageScroll2=main.getElementsByClassName('image_scroll_2')[0];
imageScroll3=main.getElementsByClassName('image_scroll_3')[0];
totalHeight=imageScroll3.clientHeight;
UP='upwards';
DOWN='downwards';
isPlaying=true;
direction=UP;
increment=10;
if(direction===DOWN){
initY= -totalHeight;
destY=0;
}else{
initY=0;
destY= -totalHeight;
}
currY=initY;
imageScroll2.appendChild(imageScroll3.cloneNode(true));
if(imageScroll2.addEventListener){
imageScroll2.addEventListener('mouseover',function(){isPlaying=false;},false);
imageScroll2.addEventListener('mouseout',function(){isPlaying=true;},false);
}else{
imageScroll2.attachEvent('onmouseover',function(){isPlaying=false;});
imageScroll2.attachEvent('onmouseout',function(){isPlaying=true;});
}
requestAnimFrame(render);
}
function render(){
if(isPlaying){
imageScroll2.style.transform='translate(0px,'+currY+'px)';
if(direction===DOWN){
currY+=increment;
if(currY>=destY){currY=initY;}
}else{
currY-=increment;
if(currY<=destY){currY=initY;}
}
}
requestAnimFrame(render);
}
//
init();
New to Javascript, and this one is troubling me a little. I am basically trying to make a whack-a-mole type game. Once I add the images, I want to remove them one by one. I think I have the unique IDs added, but but when I add the image removal, everything stops working. What am I doing wrong? I also thought to find other items besides the .remove, but I'm not sure what that part of the code is called (method, function, etc.) My code is below.
function addMole(){
var xPos = randomPosX();
var yPos = randomPosY();
var count=0;
$("#gamespace").append('<img src="img/roach.png" style="left: '+xPos+'px; top: '+yPos+'px;" id="img'+count+'"/>');
var r=Math.floor(Math.random()*2000);
t=setTimeout("addMole();", r);
$("#gamespace").remove("img'+count+'"").removeAttribute(img'+count+'");
count++;
}
Everything stops working because this line is not valid JavaScript:
$("#gamespace").remove("img'+count+'"").removeAttribute(img'+count+'");
check your quotes: while '...' and "..." are interchangeable, single " and ' are not.
Another problem is, after fixing the above, that your code logic doesn't pan out: you are adding an image then immediately removing it. I don't quite know what you are trying to do so I can't rewrite it for you; the best I can do is tell you to define your flow more in detail.
Finally, when you are creating elements programmatically, it is generally nicer and less failure-prone to keep element references rather than mess with IDs.
var $gamespace = $('#gamespace');
var $img = $('<img>').css({
left: left,
top: top
}).appendTo($gamespace);
// ...
$img.remove();
use
$("#gamespace").find("#img'"+count+"'").remove();
instead of
$("#gamespace").remove("img'+count+'"").removeAttribute(img'+count+'");
or.. while image ID is unique you can use directly
$("#img'"+count+"'").remove();
You had some invalid quotations:
function addMole(){
var xPos = randomPosX();
var yPos = randomPosY();
var count=0;
$("#gamespace").append('<img src="img/roach.png" style="left: '+xPos+'px; top:' + yPos + 'px;" id="img'+count+'"/>');
var r=Math.floor(Math.random()*2000);
t = setTimeout(addMole, r);//is t defined already?
$("#gamespace").remove("#img" + count).removeAttribute("img" + count);//why you need removeAttribute
count++;
}
move the count declaration outside of your function... it's reset to 0 each time it runs.
Also, would add 300 to your random number for remove, so it will show at elast 1/3 second... beyond this, you can reference the function directly in the setTimeout(addMole,r); ... you're creating an extra wrapper that isn't needed.
var count = -1; //first is 1
function addMole(){
count++;
var rnd;
var xPos = randomPosX();
var yPos = randomPosY();
var img = $('<img src="img/roach.png" />')
.css({left:xPos,top:yPos})
.addClass('mole')
.attr('id','img'+count);
img.click(addPoints);
$('#gamespace').append(img);
//remove image at random interval
rnd = 300 + Math.floor(Math.random() * 2000);
setTimeout(removeImageShim(img),rnd);
//add next mole at random interval
rnd = Math.floor(Math.random() * 2000);
setTimeout(addMole, rnd);
}
function addPoints() {
//TODO: addPoints
$(this).remove();
}
function removeImageShim(img) {
return function(){
img.remove();
}
}
This may be a little too specific, but I have a jquery slider that I am using <p> classes instead of images to cycle through customer quotes. Basically the problem I am running into right now is when it is static and non moving (JS code is commeneted out) they are aligned how I want them to be. As soon as the JS is un commented, they stretch out of view and you just see a white box?
Any ideas?
How I want each panel to look like:
jsfiddle
So I sort of made this my Friday project. I've changed a whole lot of your code, and added a vertical-align to the quotes and authors.
Here's the fiddle http://jsfiddle.net/qLca2fz4/49/
I added a whole lot of variables to the top of the script so you could less typing throughout.
$(document).ready(function () {
//rotation speed and timer
var speed = 5000;
var run = setInterval(rotate, speed);
var slides = $('.slide');
var container = $('#slides ul');
var elm = container.find(':first-child').prop("tagName");
var item_width = container.width();
var previous = 'prev'; //id of previous button
var next = 'next'; //id of next button
Since you used a % based width I'm setting the pixel widths of the elements in case the screen is reszed
slides.width(item_width); //set the slides to the correct pixel width
container.parent().width(item_width);
container.width(slides.length * item_width); //set the slides container to the correct total width
As you had, I'm rearranging the slides in the event the back button is pressed
container.find(elm + ':first').before(container.find(elm + ':last'));
resetSlides();
I combined the prev and next click events into a single function. It checks for the ID of the element targeted in the click event, then runs the proper previous or next functions. If you reset the setInterval after the click event your browser has trouble stopping it on hover.
//if user clicked on prev button
$('#buttons a').click(function (e) {
//slide the item
if (container.is(':animated')) {
return false;
}
if (e.target.id == previous) {
container.stop().animate({
'left': 0
}, 1500, function () {
container.find(elm + ':first').before(container.find(elm + ':last'));
resetSlides();
});
}
if (e.target.id == next) {
container.stop().animate({
'left': item_width * -2
}, 1500, function () {
container.find(elm + ':last').after(container.find(elm + ':first'));
resetSlides();
});
}
//cancel the link behavior
return false;
});
I've found mouseenter and mouseleave to be a little more reliable than hover.
//if mouse hover, pause the auto rotation, otherwise rotate it
container.parent().mouseenter(function () {
clearInterval(run);
}).mouseleave(function () {
run = setInterval(rotate, speed);
});
I broke this in to its own function because it gets called in a number of different places.
function resetSlides() {
//and adjust the container so current is in the frame
container.css({
'left': -1 * item_width
});
}
});
//a simple function to click next link
//a timer will call this function, and the rotation will begin :)
And here's your rotation timer.
function rotate() {
$('#next').click();
}
It took me a little bit, but I think I figured out a few things.
http://jsfiddle.net/qLca2fz4/28/
First off, your console was throwing a few errors: first, that rotate wasn't defined and that an arrow gif didn't exist. Arrow gif was probably something you have stored locally, but I changed the 'rotate' error by changing the strings in the code here to your actual variables.
So, from:
run = setInterval('rotate()', speed);
We get:
run = setInterval(rotate, speed);
(No () based on the examples here: http://www.w3schools.com/jsref/met_win_setinterval.asp)
But I think a more important question is why your text wasn't showing up at all. It's because of the logic found here:
$('#slides ul').css({'left' : left_value});
You even say that this is setting the default placement for the code. But it isn't..."left_vaule" is the amount that you've calculated to push left during a slide. So if you inspect the element, you can see how the whole UL is basically shifted one slide's worth too far left, unable to be seen. So we get rid of 'left_value', and replace it with 0.
$('#slides ul').css({'left' : 0});
Now, there's nothing really handling how the pictures slide in, so that part's still rough, but this should be enough to start on.
Let me know if I misunderstood anything, or if you have any questions.
So, a few things:
1) I believe you are trying to get all of the lis to be side-by-side, not arranged up and down. There are a few ways to do this. I'd just make the ul have a width of 300%, and then make the lis each take up a third of that:
#slides ul {
....
width: 300%;
}
#slides li {
width: calc(100% / 3);
height:250px;
float:left;
}
2) You got this right, but JSFiddle automatically wraps all your JS inside a $(document).ready() handler, and your function, rotate needs to be outside, in the normal DOM. Just change that JSFiddle setting from 'onload' to 'no wrap - in head'
3) Grabbing the CSS value of an element doesn't always work, especially when you're dealing with animating elements. You already know the width of the li elements with your item_width variable. I'd just use that and change your code:
var left_indent = parseInt($('#slides ul').css('left')) - item_width;
$('#slides ul').animate({'left' : left_indent}, 1500, function () {
to:
$('#slides ul').stop().animate({'left' : -item_width * 2}, 1500, function () {
4) Throw in the .stop() as seen in the above line. This prevents your animations from overlapping. An alternative, and perhaps cleaner way to do this, would be to simply return false at the beginning of your 'next' and 'prev' functions if #slides ul is being animated, like so:
if ($('#slides ul').is(':animated')) return false;
And I think that's everything. Here's the JSFiddle. Cheers!
EDIT:
Oh, and you may also want to clearInterval at the beginning of the next and prev functions and then reset it in the animation callback functions:
$('#prev').click(function() {
if ($('#slides ul').is(':animated')) return false;
clearInterval(run);
$('#slides ul').stop().animate({'left' : 0}, 1500,function(){
....
run = setInterval('rotate()', speed);
});
});
I'm trying to build a simple image slider (but using a fade effect). Every two seconds, the image should change to another image. At the end, it should call repeat_sponsor() again, to start over, so it becomes a loop.
I've written this (highly ineffective) code for 5 images. Turns out I'm going to need it for around 50 images. My editor just freezes when I add too much code.
I've tried using while-loops, but I just can't figure it out how to do this the right way.
Anyone who can help me with this?
function repeat_sponsor()
{
$("#sponsor2").hide();
$("#sponsor3").hide();
$("#sponsor4").hide();
$("#sponsor5").fadeOut("slow");
$("#sponsor1").fadeIn("slow", function() {
setTimeout(function(){$("#sponsor2").fadeIn("slow", function() {
setTimeout(function(){$("#sponsor3").fadeIn("slow", function() {
setTimeout(function(){$("#sponsor4").fadeIn("slow", function() {
setTimeout(function(){$("#sponsor5").fadeIn("slow", ...
(function (){
var cnt = 50; //set to the last one...
var max=50;
function show() {
$("#sponsor" + cnt).fadeOut("slow"); //if you want the fadeout to be done before showing next, put the following code in the complete callback
cnt++;
if(cnt>max) {
cnt=1;
}
$("#sponsor" + cnt).fadeIn("slow");
window.setTimeout(show, 2000);
}
show();
})();
But the real issue is the fact you are loading tons of images from the start. You will be better off changing it so you only have a small subset of images and change the source.
You should use some sort of for loop and a class for hiding the images. and add a max value that if checks out resets c & i
var i=0;
var c=1;
function repeat_sponsor()
{
$("#sponsor"+i).fadeOut("slow");
$(".sponsers").hide()
$("#sponsor"+c).fadeIn("slow", function() {
window.setTimeout(repeat_sponsor(), 3000);
}
i++;
c++;
}
Just run a function every two seconds with setInterval and appropriately target your different sponsor divs:
var i = 1;
var max = 50;
setInterval(function() {
// Could target all other sponsor images with a class "sponsor"
$('.sponsor').fadeOut();
// Execute code on the target
$("#sponsor" + i).fadeIn();
if (i === max) {
i = 0;
}
i++;
}, 2000);
So I've created the following function to fade elements in and passed in a div that I want to fade in which in this case is an image gallery popup that I want to show when a user clicks an image thumbnail on my site. I'm also passing in a speed value (iSpeed) which the timeout uses for it's time value. In this case I'm using 25 (25ms).
I've stepped through this function whilst doing so it appears to be functioning as expected. If the current opacity is less than 1, then it is incremented and it will recall itself after the timeout until the opacity reaches 1. When it reaches one it stops fading and returns.
So after stepping through it, I take off my breakpoints and try to see it in action but for some reason my gallery instantly appears without any sense of fading.
var Effects = new function () {
this.Fading = false;
this.FadeIn = function (oElement, iSpeed) {
//set opacity to zero if we haven't started fading yet.
if (this.Fading == false) {
oElement.style.opacity = 0;
}
//if we've reached or passed max opacity, stop fading
if (oElement.style.opacity >= 1) {
oElement.style.opacity = 1;
this.Fading = false;
return;
}
//otherwise, fade
else {
this.Fading = true;
var iCurrentOpacity = parseFloat(oElement.style.opacity);
oElement.style.opacity = iCurrentOpacity + 0.1;
setTimeout(Effects.FadeIn(oElement, iSpeed), iSpeed);
}
}
}
Here's where I'm setting up the gallery.
this.Show = function (sPage, iImagesToDisplay, oSelectedImage) {
//create and show overlay
var oOverlay = document.createElement('div');
oOverlay.id = 'divOverlay';
document.body.appendChild(oOverlay);
//create and show gallery box
var oGallery = document.createElement('div');
oGallery.id = 'divGallery';
oGallery.style.opacity = 0;
document.body.appendChild(oGallery);
//set position of gallery box
oGallery.style.top = (window.innerHeight / 2) - (oGallery.clientHeight / 2) + 'px';
oGallery.style.left = (window.innerWidth / 2) - (oGallery.clientWidth / 2) + 'px';
//call content function
ImageGallery.CreateContent(oGallery, sPage, iImagesToDisplay, oSelectedImage);
//fade in gallery
Effects.FadeIn(oGallery, 25);
}
Could anyone help me out?
Also, I'm using IE10 and I've also tried Chrome, same result.
Thanks,
Andy
This line:
setTimeout(Effects.FadeIn(oElement, iSpeed), iSpeed);
calls Effects.FadeIn with the given arguments, and feeds its return value into setTimeout. This is exactly like foo(bar()), which calls bar immediately, and then feeds its return value into foo.
Since your FadeIn function doesn't return a function, that would be the problem.
Perhaps you meant:
setTimeout(function() {
Effects.FadeIn(oElement, iSpeed);
}, iSpeed);
...although you'd be better off creating that function once and reusing it.
For instance, I think this does what you're looking for, but without recreating functions on each loop:
var Effects = new function () {
this.FadeIn = function (oElement, iSpeed) {
var fading = false;
var timer = setInterval(function() {
//set opacity to zero if we haven't started fading yet.
if (fading == false) { // Consider `if (!this.Fading)`
oElement.style.opacity = 0;
}
//if we've reached or passed max opacity, stop fading
if (oElement.style.opacity >= 1) {
oElement.style.opacity = 1;
clearInterval(timer);
}
//otherwise, fade
else {
fading = true;
var iCurrentOpacity = parseFloat(oElement.style.opacity);
oElement.style.opacity = iCurrentOpacity + 0.1;
}
}, iSpeed);
};
};
Your code has a lot of problems. The one culpable for the element appearing immediately is that you call setTimeout not with a function but with the result of a function, because Effects.FadeIn will be executed immediately.
setTimeout(function(){Effects.FadeIn(oElement, iSpeed)}, iSpeed);
will probably act as you intend.
But seriously, you probably should not re-invent this wheel. jQuery will allow you to fade elements in and out easily and CSS transitions allow you to achieve element fading with as much as adding or removing a CSS class.
T.J. and MoMolog are both right about the bug: you're invoking the Effects.FadeIn function immediately before passing the result to setTimeout—which means that Effects.FadeIn calls itself synchronously again and again until the condition oElement.style.opacity >= 1 is reached.
As you may or may not know, many UI updates that all take place within one turn of the event loop will be batched together on the next repaint (or something like that) so you won't see any sort of transition.
This jsFiddle includes the suggested JS solution, as well as an alternate approach that I think you may find to be better: simply adding a CSS class with the transition property. This will result in a smoother animation. Note that if you go this route, though, you may need to also include some vendor prefixes.