Develop Reference

Cloning and manipulating nested object using forEach, map, or filter without modifying original object

I'm trying to get a handle on using .map, .filter to clone and modify a big nested JSON object based on a deeply nested property. With the below code, the original data and the filtered data both end up getting modified, but I'm trying to leave the original data intact. What I'm hoping to do is have the deeply nested concerns array emptied in the final filtered object for a given id, leaving the original data as the original complete data set.
var data {...};
var dataFilter = function dataBuild(data) {
var newData = data;
newData.service_requests = newData.service_requests.map((request) => {
request.concerns = request.concerns.filter((concern) => {
return concern.building_id == 2
});
return request;
});
return newData;
};
var filtered = dataFilter(data);
Here's a fiddle with what I'm trying to do with the full object in there.
http://jsbin.com/doyoqinoxo/edit?js,console

When you do:
var newData = data;
you are simply making a second reference to the same object, so:
newData.service_requests = ...
overwrites the value in data.service_requests.
It seems you want newData to be a copy of data, not a reference to the same object. There are plenty of posts here on how to copy a nested object (a so–called deep copy), e.g. What is the most efficient way to clone an object?, but please ignore the accepted answer unless you are using jQuery. Use one of the other answers, like this one.

JSIterator .map() creates the new array with the same number of elements or does not change the original array. There might be the problem with referencing if there is object inside the array as it copies the same reference, so, when you are making any changes on the property of the object it will change the original value of the element which holds the same reference.
The solution would be to copy the object, well, array.Splice() and [...array](spread Operator) would not help in this case, you can use JavaScript Utility library like Loadash or just use below mention code:
const newList = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(orinalArr))

angularjs : iterate array with key value pairs

I am creating an array like the following:
var arr =[];
arr['key1'] = 'value1';
arr['key2'] = 'value2';
If is use this array in ng-repeat tag, it is not displaying anything. Is there any way to make it work?
<div data-ng-repeat='(key,value) in arr'>{{key}} - {{value}}</div>
Is there any way to make it work?

The way to go, is to creat plain object (instead of array)
// instead of creatin of an Array
// $scope.myArr = [];
// we just create plain object
$scope.myArr = {};
...
// here we just add properties (key/value)
$scope.myArr['attempt1'] = {};
...
// which is in this case same as this syntax
$scope.myArr.attempt1 = {};
Thee is updated plunker
Check more details what is behind for example here:
Javascript: Understanding Objects vs Arrays and When to Use Them. [Part 1]

Your associative array is nothing but an object, as far as JavaScript is concerned. IMO Associative arrays and Objects are almost same.
Ex: Your arr['key1'] = 'value1'; can be called as console.log(arr.key1);
To make your code work, you need to change the array declaration by removing [] and replacing with {} (Curly braces)
Like this var arr = {};

Stop the changing of one objects param affecting copies of that object

Say I have multiple arrays.
var array1= [];
var array2= [];
var array3= [];
And I have another array of objects, each with a health parameter.
Say I push the first object in this array into array1, array2 and array3.
Now if I edit the health parameter of array1's object:
array1[0].health -= 50
it changes the health for each arrays object. How can I do it so it only does it for the array im calling into?

If you want a copy of the object in each array, and you don't want the modification of one to affect the others, then you will need to clone the object. The answers on this post will help you with this:
What is the most efficient way to deep clone an object in JavaScript?

Objects in javascript are assigned by reference so if you put the same object into two separate arrays, each array element points at exactly the same object.
If you want separate objects in each array, then you have to explicitly make a new object for the second array (copying properties from the first object if that's what you want).
In jQuery, you can use $.extend() to make a copy of an object. See this answer for two different ways to use it.
Or, in plain Javascript, here's a function that makes a shallow copy of a plain JS object.
function copyObj(src) {
var copy = {};
for (var prop in src) {
if (src.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
copy[prop] = src[prop];
}
}
return copy;
}

var array1 = []
var array2 = []
array1.health = 50
array2.health = 10
console.log(array1.health)
50
it still remains 50. On the other hand if your question relates to changing array elements as such
var array1= [0,1]
array1[0].health = 50
array1[1].health = 10
console.log(array[0].health) will print out 10 because health is an property of the array object not the element.

Javascript pushing objects into array changes entire array

I'm using a specific game making framework but I think the question applies to javascript
I was trying to make a narration script so the player can see "The orc hits you." at the bottom of his screen. I wanted to show the last 4 messages at one time and possibly allow the player to look back to see 30-50 messages in a log if they want. To do this I set up and object and an array to push the objects into.
So I set up some variables like this initially...
servermessage: {"color1":"yellow", "color2":"white", "message1":"", "message2":""},
servermessagelist: new Array(),
and when I use this command (below) multiple times with different data called by an event by manipulating servermessage.color1 ... .message1 etc...
servermessagelist.push(servermessage)
it overwrites the entire array with copies of that data... any idea why or what I can do about it.
So if I push color1 "RED" and message1 "Rover".. the data is correct then if I push
color1"yellow" and message1 "Bus" the data is two copies of .color1:"yellow" .message1:"Bus"

When you push servermessage into servermessagelist you're really (more or less) pushing a reference to that object. So any changes made to servermessage are reflected everywhere you have a reference to it. It sounds like what you want to do is push a clone of the object into the list.
Declare a function as follows:
function cloneMessage(servermessage) {
var clone ={};
for( var key in servermessage ){
if(servermessage.hasOwnProperty(key)) //ensure not adding inherited props
clone[key]=servermessage[key];
}
return clone;
}
Then everytime you want to push a message into the list do:
servermessagelist.push( cloneMessage(servermessage) );

When you add the object to the array, it's only a reference to the object that is added. The object is not copied by adding it to the array. So, when you later change the object and add it to the array again, you just have an array with several references to the same object.
Create a new object for each addition to the array:
servermessage = {"color1":"yellow", "color2":"white", "message1":"", "message2":""};
servermessagelist.push(servermessage);
servermessage = {"color1":"green", "color2":"red", "message1":"", "message2":"nice work"};
servermessagelist.push(servermessage);

There are two ways to use deep copy the object before pushing it into the array.
1. create new object by object method and then push it.
servermessagelist = [];
servermessagelist.push(Object.assign({}, servermessage));
Create an new reference of object by JSON stringigy method and push it with parse method.
servermessagelist = [];
servermessagelist.push(JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(servermessage));
This method is useful for nested objects.

servermessagelist: new Array() empties the array every time it's executed. Only execute that code once when you originally initialize the array.

I also had same issue. I had bit complex object that I was pushing in to the array. What I did; I Convert JSON object as String using JSON.stringify() and push in to the Array.
When it is returning from the array I just convert that String to JSON object using JSON.parse().
This is working fine for me though it is bit far more round solution.
Post here If you guys having alternative options

I do not know why a JSON way of doing this has not been suggested yet.
You can first stringify the object and then parse it again to get a copy of the object.
let uniqueArr = [];
let referencesArr = [];
let obj = {a: 1, b:2};
uniqueArr.push(JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj)));
referencesArr.push(obj);
obj.a = 3;
obj.c = 5;
uniqueArr.push(JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj)));
referencesArr.push(obj);
//You can see the differences in the console logs
console.log(uniqueArr);
console.log(referencesArr);

This solution also work on the object containing nested keys.
Before pushing, stringify the obj by
JSON.stringify(obj)
And when you are using, parse by
JSON.parse(obj);

As mentioned multiple times above, the easiest way of doing this would be making it a string and converting it back to JSON Object.
this.<JSONObjectArray>.push(JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(<JSONObject>)));
Works like a charm.

Test for value within array of objects

I am dynamically building an array of objects using a process that boils down to something like this:
//Objects Array
var objects = [];
//Object Structure
var object1 = {"id":"foobar_1", "metrics":90};
var object2 = {"id":"some other foobar", "metrics":50};
objects[0] = object1;
objects[1] = object2;
(Let it be said for the record, that if you can think of a better way to dynamically nest data such that I can access it with objects[i].id I am also all ears!)
There's ultimately going to be more logic at play than what's above, but it's just not written yet. Suffice it to say that the "object1" and "object2" parts will actually be in an iterator.
Inside that iterator, I want to check for the presence of an ID before adding another object to the array. If, for example, I already have an object with the ID "foobar_1", instead of pushing a new member to the array, I simply want to increment its "metrics" value.
If I wasn't dealing with an array of objects, I could use inArray to look for "foobar_1" (a jQuery utility). But that won't look into the object's values. The way I see it, I have two options:
Keep a separate simple array of just the IDs. So instead of only relying on the objects array, I simply check inArray (or plain JS equivalent) for a simple "objectIDs" array that is used only for this purpose.
Iterate through my existing data object and compare my "foobar_1" needle to each objects[i].id haystack
I feel that #1 is certainly more efficient, but I can't help wondering if I'm missing a function that would do the job for me. A #3, 4, or 5 option that I've missed! CPU consumption is somewhat important, but I'm also interested in functions that make the code less verbose whether they're more cycle-efficient or not.

I'd suggest switching to an object instead of an array:
var objects = {};
objects["foobar_1"] = {metrics: 90};
objects["some other foobar"] = {metrics: 50};
Then, to add a new object uniquely, you would do this:
function addObject(id, metricsNum) {
if (!(id in objects)) {
objects[id] = {metrics: metricsNum};
}
}
To iterate all the objects, you would do this:
for (var id in objects) {
// process objects[id]
}
This gives you very efficient lookup for whether a given id is already in your list or not. The only thing it doesn't give you that the array gave you before is a specific order of objects because the keys of an object don't have any specific order.

Hmm , i wonder why dont you use dictionary cause that is perfectlly fits your case. so your code will be as below:
//Objects Array
var objects = [];
//Object Structure
var object1 = {"metrics":90};
var object2 = {"metrics":50};
objects["foobar_1"] = object1;
objects["some other foobar"] = object2;
// An example to showing the object existence.
if (!objects["new id"]){
objects["new id"] = {"metrics": 100};
}
else {
objects["new id"].matrics++;
}