<style>
.info{
width:94%;
}
</style>
Now doing like this using JQuery
$('.info').css('width');
returns 94px rather than the equivalent value in pixles (500px in my case.)
if i set the width in css as 105% , JQuery would return it as 105px .
The height and width of the parent container is 600px and 500px respectively.
I think a possible cause is the container of the element being hidden at the moment you're trying to obtain the dimensions.
I had a similar situation with nested divs and tables.
See the following fiddle where I managed to reproduce the behavior:
http://jsfiddle.net/36yvb/
I still think it's a bug in jQuery returning a percentage as an integer number (without the % sign) when not being able to actually compute the dimensions of the element.
Change the width of #another-cell (expressed in %) and see it return the same value without the % sign when the table is hidden.
Actually, it doesn't seem so: see this fiddle.
html:
<div id="info"></div>
css:
html, body {
position: relative;
width: 500px;
}
#info {
width: 94%;
}
js:
$( function() {
document.write( $('#info').css('width') );
});
what is info width relative to? is it an element with 100px width maybe?
The width that it returns depends upon what part of the HTML is it written in. Meaning to say is that if it is written inside tag then then 94% percent would reflect 94% of that particular div.
But again if another tag in the same tag is already using some amount of defined width then the info might even get lesser space if the tag in defined before the info tag.
Please give up more amount of actual code to get a better answer
The only thing that explains this behavior is that you have more than one element with the class info
When this happens and you do a $('.info').css('width'); jQuery will return to you the width of the first element in the set.
If this is the case, you may need to be more specific with your selector.
DEMO
Each broswer will return textually different, but logically equal values e.g., #FFF, #ffffff, and rgb(255,255,255) when using .css()
Instead of using .css('width') use .width()
According to jQuery: http://api.jquery.com/width/
The difference between .css(width) and .width() is that the latter
returns a unit-less pixel value (for example, 400) while the former
returns a value with units intact (for example, 400px). The .width()
method is recommended when an element's width needs to be used in a
mathematical calculation.
Related
Sorry, I'm new to using the Javascript DOM and after my research I couldn't find anything. then i decided to post here
For example:
When I type
console.log(window.innerHeight);
it outputs 633.
then I create an html element and give its height a value of 633px look like:
width: 100%;
height: 633px;
I want this html element to look like a full page, but I cannot
height: 100%
because a different html element will come under it.
When the page height changes, the html element whose height I set as 633px is broken
the main question: Is there a way to equalize the window.innerHeight output with the height of the html element?
I'm not sure why you have two html elements on the same page but setting that aside... How does the second one come in? Does it get loaded via JavaScript? If so, you could make sure the first html id has an id like "" and use javascript to do something like this after the new one gets loaded:
var element = document.getElementById('whatever');
element.style.height = window.innerHeight + 'px';
This can be more easily solved using CSS using the relative units vw and vh. This unit is relative to the viewport. It can be used like this:
.fullscreen {
width: 100vw;
height: 100vh;
}
This example will always remain 100% of both width and height of the viewport and will therefor also scale responsively.
Suppose I have the following.
HTML:
<div id="foo"></div>
CSS:
#foo{
width: 150px;
}
JS:
document.getElementById("foo").style.width //Equals to "" instead of 150px
$("#foo").css("width") //equals to the expected "150px"
or this JSFiddle.
Why can we access the width of the element using jQuery but not using vanilla JS? Is it because external CSS rules are not part of the DOM?
Try offsetWidth. When you try to access style.width, it will give you just the width assigned to the element's style property. But in your case it is assigned the width via css rule.
document.getElementById("foo").offsetWidth;
Fiddle
Edit: clientWidth would probably be more appropriate as it gives you the inner width of the element, where as offsetWidth considers borders, margins as well.
Use getComputedStyle. See this updated fiddle:
computedWidth = window.getComputedStyle(document.getElementById("foo"), null).
getPropertyValue("width");
elem.style will just give you back inline styles associated with the element, i.e. the contents of the style="" attribute.
Using:
$(my_div).width(window.innerWidth)
Does not provide the desired result, because it does not account for the vertical scrollbar, so the element overflows the window, creating a horizontal scrollbar, as illustred below.
Illustration http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/62862049/Screenshots/om.png
You could use width:100%
<div style="width:100%;height:1500px;background:red"></div>
Demo
window.innerWidth includes the width of the vertical scrollbar in some versions of Firefox:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/window.innerWidth
however, w3schools seems to disagree (it says it doesn't include the width of the scrollbar):
http://www.w3schools.com/jsref/prop_win_innerheight.asp
There's even a bug concerning this in the Mozilla bug tracker:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156388#c14
The confusion above has been cleared a bit with CSS3, which has a specific property to calculate widths, box-sizing. Set box-sizing like this:
box-sizing: border-box
Which does the following (quoted from w3schools):
The specified width and height (and min/max properties) on this element determine the border box of the element. That is, any padding or border specified on the element is laid out and drawn inside this specified width and height. The content width and height are calculated by subtracting the border and padding widths of the respective sides from the specified 'width' and 'height' properties
You can use width:100% as noted, but bear in mind that this will ALSO include any extra spacing and padding you got - however, in CSS3-enabled browsers, this is resolved with the correct box-sizing property, as noted above. So, if you got, say a div like:
<div style="width:100%; padding: 20px;">
<div style="width:100%; background:red">Test</div>
</div>
The inner div will go off-bounds according to the CSS21 spec. Here's a jsFiddle that illustrates this problem.
So, make sure that you don't have any padding to avoid such issues.
If you want to use jQuery to get the width of the window, you could use jQuery's width() method (or css("width")).
Could you use
$(my_div).css('width', '100%');
?
$(my_div).css("width", "100%");
or
#my_div {
width: 100%;
}
You're also probably going to want to make sure your body or parent div has no padding or margin:
body {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
I have a div inside of another div. The outer div has a percentage width (80%), and I want the inner div to have 30px less width than the width of the outer div. How do I do this? I'm assuming I'll need to use javascript?
Thanks in advance.
Use margins :
<div style="width:80%;">
<div style="margin-left:15px;margin-right:15px;"> inner </div>
</div>
demonstration
#dystroy has a very good answer, though it lacks dynamic customization.
My take, use CSS variables.
You'll have to do something like this:
#parent-div
{
var-width: 100px; /* Or something else? */
//Notice that though the attribute is named var-width, the browser will
//treat it as width and will use the `var-` prefix as directive
//so that the calculations can be performed by using it as variable.
}
#child-div
{
width: calc(var(width) - 30);
}
This will make the CSS calculate the child's width.
More on this, here.
The width of the div "topNav" changes by few pixels when its position style is changed from relative to fixed. I found a jquery plugin (http://imakewebthings.github.com/jquery-waypoints/) which can perform the same functionality I'm looking for elegantly, but I feel it is a overkill for this purpose.
EDIT: My question is how to avoid changing the div sizes.
Check out the code at :
http://jsbin.com/azace5/edit
You need to remove the page's "default margin". This will do it in "every browser":
html, body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0
}
See: http://jsbin.com/azace5/2
Or you can add a minimum width.
min-width:600px;