I have a object in mainController.js that is set as default as 99.
I am obtaining user location and do running some other function with it to calculate this value.
However, When I load the page, the page seems to load faster than this process. Therefore it displays 99 instead of the calculated value.
If I put console.log after the calculation, the object is successfully changed.
edit1:
status.success( function(data)
{
$scope.current = data;
$scope.$broadcast('back_end_connected');
});
$scope.getLocation = function()
{
if (navigator.geolocation)
{
navigator.geolocation.getCurrentPosition(function (position){
$scope.location = {lat: position.coords.latitude, lng: position.coords.longitude};
$scope.$broadcast('location_obtained');
$scope.buildDist();
$scope.fetch();
//$scope.getRec();
});
}
else{
alert("Geolocation is not supported by this browser.");
}
};
var dirBuilt = false;
$scope.$on('location_obtained', function(){
$scope.buildDist = function()
{
if(dirBuilt === false)
{
$scope.facilities[0].distance = distCalc($scope.location.lat,$scope.location.lng,$scope.facilities[0].location.lat,$scope.facilities[0].location.lng);
$scope.facilities[1].distance = distCalc($scope.location.lat,$scope.location.lng,$scope.facilities[1].location.lat,$scope.facilities[1].location.lng);
$scope.facilities[2].distance = distCalc($scope.location.lat,$scope.location.lng,$scope.facilities[2].location.lat,$scope.facilities[2].location.lng);
$scope.facilities[3].distance = distCalc($scope.location.lat,$scope.location.lng,$scope.facilities[3].location.lat,$scope.facilities[3].location.lng);
$scope.facilities[4].distance = distCalc($scope.location.lat,$scope.location.lng,$scope.facilities[4].location.lat,$scope.facilities[4].location.lng);
$scope.facilities[5].distance = distCalc($scope.location.lat,$scope.location.lng,$scope.facilities[5].location.lat,$scope.facilities[5].location.lng);
$scope.$broadcast('dist_obtained');
dirBuilt = true;
alert("aaa: "+ $scope.facilities[0].distance);
}
};
});
that "alert("aaa: "+ $scope.facilities[0].distance);" returns the value I want it to display but it is not displayed on the page....
(ng-bind would not work for some reason...)
How can I make the html wait for the operation? Thanks
You should not make HTML wait until you finish your Js code ! What you should be doing is showing a placeholder value - Loading image so that user know the page is loading some data.
Once you are done with your calculation, hide /replace the loading image with the data you want to show.
Quick example
Your view markup will have some HTML element to show the progress bar.And all your other contents will be in another div
<body ng-app="yourApp" ng-controller="yourCtrl as vm">
<div ng-show="loaderCount>0"> Loading something..</div>
<div ng-show="loaderCount==0">
<h4>{{userScore}}</h4>
</div>
</body>
And in your angular controller, You have a scope variable called loaderCount which you will increase everytime when you are doing some operation (http call/Long running function execution etc..). When you get your result, You decrease this variable value back. In your View You are hiding and showing the Loading Pane based on this value.
var yourApp= angular.module('yourApp', []);
var ctrl = function($scope, $http) {
var vm = this;
vm.loaderCount = 0;
vm.someValue = "";
vm.actionItems = [{ Name: "Test" }, { Name: "Test2" }];
vm.loaderCount++;
$http.get("../Home/GetSlowData").then(function(s) {
vm.loaderCount--;
vm.someValue = s.data;
});
};
yourApp.controller('yourCtrl', ['$scope', '$http', ctrl]);
This might not be the best angular code. But this will give you an idea about how to handle this use case. You should be using services to talk to Http endpoints instead of directly using $http in your angular controller.
Note that, $http.get returns a promise which allows you do things when you get the response from this asynchronous operation (the then event). You should make sure that your time taking calculation is returning a promise.
You can bind with the ngBind directive instead of {{}} and not write to the binded property when the calculation is done.
This will hide the result from the view while it is null.
Try to do something like this:
$scope.value = "Loading";
or
$scope.value = "";
$scope.calculate = function() {
$scope.value = yourcalculation;
}
$scope.calculate();
Or in your case i think if you use $scope.$apply() after you add data to your scope element will do the trick
Try this :
$scope.$on('location_obtained', function(){
$scope.buildDist = function()
{
if(dirBuilt === false)
{
$scope.facilities[0].distance = distCalc($scope.location.lat,$scope.location.lng,$scope.facilities[0].location.lat,$scope.facilities[0].location.lng);
$scope.facilities[1].distance = distCalc($scope.location.lat,$scope.location.lng,$scope.facilities[1].location.lat,$scope.facilities[1].location.lng);
$scope.facilities[2].distance = distCalc($scope.location.lat,$scope.location.lng,$scope.facilities[2].location.lat,$scope.facilities[2].location.lng);
$scope.facilities[3].distance = distCalc($scope.location.lat,$scope.location.lng,$scope.facilities[3].location.lat,$scope.facilities[3].location.lng);
$scope.facilities[4].distance = distCalc($scope.location.lat,$scope.location.lng,$scope.facilities[4].location.lat,$scope.facilities[4].location.lng);
$scope.facilities[5].distance = distCalc($scope.location.lat,$scope.location.lng,$scope.facilities[5].location.lat,$scope.facilities[5].location.lng);
$scope.$broadcast('dist_obtained');
dirBuilt = true;
alert("aaa: "+ $scope.facilities[0].distance);
$scope.$apply(); // This should do the trick
}
};
});
Are you using a promise on the service? The function running your calculation can be in a separate angular factory which has .success and .error events to tap into. If the calculation is a success. You can pass the data back to your controller and then bind that data to the controller scope. I'll be at a computer soon and will add some code to explain further if needed.
This would be your distance calculator, I used a Factory over a service but you can read about why to use one over the other
A couple of things to keep in mind. You geolcation is more of a service then something to control since you're requesting from the user, you could add it to the below factory to expand the factories capabilities and allow you to use getLocation in other controllers.
make sure you add the distance service to your html document
also make sure you put the distance service in your controller and on the main angular app.
distanceService.js
(function(){
'use strict'
var distSrvc= angular.module("distanceService",[])
distSrvc.factory('DistanceCalc',['$http',function($http){
return{
getDistance:function(facilitiesData,locationData){
Object.keys(facilitiesData).length; // or if it's already an array of facilities use facilitiesData.length
// if its a javascript object and distance is already defined
for (var distance in facilitiesData) {
if (facilitiesData.hasOwnProperty(distance)) {
facilitiesData.distance = distCalc(locationData.lat,locationData.lng,facilitieData.location.lat,facilitieData.location.lng);
}
}
// if its an array of objects
for (var i = 0 ; i< facilitiesData.length;i++){
facilitiesData[i].distance = distCalc(locationData.lat,locationData.lng,facilitieData.location.lat,facilitieData.location.lng);
}
return facilitiesData
}
})();
Then in your controller you'll need to load the service for use.
yourcontroller.js this will give errors if you don't load it on the html page and add it to the main angular app.
(function(){
'use strict'
var myController= angular.module("distanceService",[])
myController.controller('myController',['$scope','DistanceCalc',function($http,DistanceCalc){ // see how i added the service and passed it to the function
$scope.getLocation = function(){
if (navigator.geolocation)
{
navigator.geolocation.getCurrentPosition(function (position){
$scope.location = {lat: position.coords.latitude, lng: position.coords.longitude};
$scope.$broadcast('location_obtained');
$scope.buildDist();
$scope.fetch();
//$scope.getRec();
});
}
else{
alert("Geolocation is not supported by this browser.");
}
};
// this line below sends the data to the service
DistanceCalc.getDistance($scope.facilities,$scope.location)
.success(function(data){
//success i'm done running distance calculations and now i want to update the facilties object with the added distance
$scope.facilities = data
})
.error(function(data){
// some error occurred and data can tell you about that error
})
}
})();
I am trying to implement a list-details view. The list is generated with $firebaseArray(ref). When an item on the list is clicked, the list controller uses list.$getRecord(item.$id) to get the particular record. Puts it in a global service(just and empty object with set and get) and in my detail controller i assign that service(already set to the selected item) to a scope variable in the detail controller and display it.
The information in the detail view is editable. and when it is editted, a save button appears which when clicked saves the edit using this code
item = editItem; //editItem contains the new changes made on the detail page
list.$save(item).then(function(ref){
//ref.key() === item.$id; //
console.log("Your Edit has been saved');
});
This works. The edits are reflected on the remote firebase data.
But the problem occurs when i navigate back to the list view and try to click another item. It gets an error which says list.$getRecord() is not a function. Now this error doesn't occur when you don't save an edit on the details view.
I printed out the list array before and after i save and i realised this
List array before an item is saved (contains AngularFire methods)
List array after an item is saved (no longer contains AngularFire methods)
I have no idea why $firebaseArray is reacting this way. Is there something i am missing? is this a normal behaviour?
PS: i am using ionic and angularFire.
I can post more code if neccesary
EDIT
Here is an abstraction of the code
List.html
<ion-list>
<ion-item href="#/lead/info" ng-click="vm.selectItem(l.$id)" ng-repeat="l in vm.list" >
<h3>{{l.firstName}} {{l.lastName}}</h3>
<h4 class="">
<p>{{l.topic}}</p>
</h4>
</ion-item>
</ion-list>
list.js (controller function)
function ListCtrl(selectedItem, $firebaseArray) {
/* jshint validthis: true */
var vm = this;
vm.list= {};
vm.selectItem = selectItem;
loadList(); //Loads the List array
function loadList() {
var fireList = new Firebase("https://xxxxx.firebaseio.com/list");
var r = $firebaseArray(fireList);
r.$loaded(function () {
vm.list = r;
});
console.log(vm.list); //Outputs the first image(above). But after an item edit and i go back, outputs the second image(above)
}
function selectItem(index) {
var sItem = vm.list.$getRecord(index);
selectedItem.setList(vm.list);
selectedItem.setItem(sItem);
}
}
The selectedItem service is simple. i use it to set a single object or array of objects
function selectedItem() {
var sItem = {};
var List = {};
return {
getItem: function () {
return sItem;
},
setItem: function (authObject) {
sItem = authObject;
},
getList: function(){
return List;
},
setList: function(al){
List = al;
}
};
};
The detail view controller is ass so:
item.js(controller function)
function ItemCtrl(selectedItem, $scope, $firebaseObject) {
/* jshint validthis: true */
var vm = this;
$scope.selectedItem = selectedItem.getItem();
$scope.listArray = selectedItem.getList();
//vm.item = $scope.selectedItem;
function saveEdit() {
var t = $scope.selectedItem;
$scope.listArray.$save(t).then(function(ref){
//console.log(ref);
});
}
};
UPDATE
After serious cross checking throughout my code i realised the issue is not from AngularFiire array. Even the workaround i did with the r.$watch and r.$loaded was unnecessary. the need for the work around was cause by another part of my code i didnt think was relevant.
I apologise for the mistake. I'd be deleting this question and a related one soon
Try using a watcher to reload the data:
var fireList = new Firebase("https://xxxxx.firebaseio.com/list");
var r = $firebaseArray(fireList);
r.$watch(function() {
r.$loaded(function () {
vm.list = r;
});
});
This is a common way of dealing with updates in an easy way, might solve your problem.
I am building an AngularJS CRUD site to add data to Parse.com to be used by mobile apps that will read it. (The CRUD is easier to do on a real keyboard due to the amount of data added.) First step is to create and save the Child objects (Ingredients and Steps), and then to create and save a Recipe object that has a Relation to the Ingredients and Steps. I need to use Relation and not Pointers for these. (because I may need this to be many to many in future)
Here's my problem: writing the query to find any Ingredients and Steps that were created that are NOT yet part of a relation, to find the ones to be added to a new recipe.
The examples in the Javascript SDK don't show this scenario, they only show a query for a relation that exists, but does not have an additional attribute on the related item (comments for posts where post doesn't have an image).
Recipe has ingredients, a Relation<Ingredient>, and steps, a Relation<Step>.
This doesn't work to get the Ingredients that are not yet related to a Recipe.
var Recipe = Parse.Object.extend("Recipe");
var Ingr = Parse.Object.extend("Ingredient");
recipeQuery= new Parse.Query(Recipe);
recipeQuery.exists("ingredients");
query = new Parse.Query(Ingr);
query.doesNotMatchQuery("recipe",recipeQuery);
query.ascending('name');
query.find({
success: function (data) {
if (data.length > 0) {
$scope.loadingMsg = '';
}
$scope.ingredients = data;
}
});
angular
.module('app.services')
.service('siteService', function($q, ParseService, $timeout) {
var that = this;
this.fetchIngr = function() {
return this.fetchRecipes().then(function(recipes) {
var q = recipes.reduce(function(initial, current) {
initial.push(that.fetchIngredient(current));
return initial;
}, []);
return $q.all(q);
});
};
this.fetchRecipes = function() {
var defer = $q.defer();
var Recipe = Parse.Object.extend("Recipe");
recipeQuery = new Parse.Query(Recipe);
recipeQuery.ascending('name');
recipeQuery.find({
success: function(data) {
console.log('data', data)
defer.resolve(data);
},
error: function(error) {
defer.reject(error);
}
});
return defer.promise;
};
this.fetchIngredient = function(recipe) {
var defer = $q.defer();
recipe.relation('ingredients').query().find({
success: function(res) {
defer.resolve(res);
},
error: function(error) {
defer.reject(error);
}
});
return defer.promise;
};
})
Usage:
siteService.fetchIngr().then(function(all){
console.log('flatten all ingr for used recipes',[].concat.apply([], all));
});
in the fetchIngr function you will receive array of all ingredients that are used in the Recipe. then you have to the diff between two arrays to find not used ingredients. To do the subtract you should fetch all ingredients and to make subtraction between two arrays (one used ingrdients for recipes and the one with all ingredients). see here the post : JavaScript array difference
if you have questions feel free to ask me.
How to I get angular to retain data updates returned in the response to a PUT?
I have a basic angular (vsn 1.2.26) RESTful app that successfully retrieves, updates and writes data back to the server. The server alters the "updateTime" field of the updated record and returns it in the (200) response to the browser. I can see the updated value in the $resource.save callback function, but I can't figure how to persist it to the $scope beyond the duration of the callback to make it visible in the UI.
angular.module('myResources',['ngResource'])
.factory('Fund',['$resource',function($resource)
{
return $resource('http://myhost/xyz/fund/:id'
,{ id: '#guid' }
,{ save: { method: 'PUT' }
,query: {method: 'GET', isArray: false }
}
);
}])
...
$scope.selectRecord = function(R)
{
...
$scope.record = R;
}
$scope.saveRecordChanges = function()
{
...
myFundResource.save($scope.record,function(response){
$scope.record = angular.fromJson(response); // gets refreshed data but doesn't update UI
console.log("new updateTime=" + $scope.record.updateTime); // correctly displays new value in the log
});
}
You can add this to your save callback function:
$scope.$apply();
Or you can change you function into:
$scope.saveRecordChanges= function(){
myFundResponse.save($scope.record).$promise.then(function(response){
$scope.record = response;
});
};
Cuz in angular $promise, it will invoke $asyncEval to call your success or error callback, which means with angular $promise will update the view automatically.
My error was that I was expecting the ng-repeat record list to update - but I wasn't updating the list, only redirecting the $scope.record (current record) pointer to a new object. I added code to update the record list:
myFundResource.save($scope.record,function(response)
{
var vIdx = $scope.allRecords.indexOf($scope.record); // allRecords is bound to the UI table via ng-repeat
$scope.record = response; // ** $scope.record no longer points to the same object as $scope.allRecords[vIdx] - array is unaware of this change
$scope.allRecords[vIdx] = $scope.record; // replace array element with new object
});
Thank you to #Tyler.z.yang for your insights and questions that got me thinking in the right direction.
I'm trying to implement nested Collections exactly like the example I found here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/17453870/295133
The only difference being is that I'm trying to store the data locally using the localStorage plugin.
Here, my Lists would be the Hotels in the example above:
var app = app || {};
(function (){
'use strict';
// List Collection - list of words
//---------------------
var listCollection = Backbone.Collection.extend({
//referebce to this collection's model
model: app.ListModel,
localStorage: new Backbone.LocalStorage('translate-lists')
});
app.listCollection = new listCollection();
})();
(function (){
'use strict';
app.ListModel = Backbone.Model.extend({
initialize: function() {
// because initialize is called after parse
_.defaults(this, {
words: new app.wordCollection
});
},
parse: function(response) {
if (_.has(response, "words")) {
this.words = new app.wordCollection(response.words, {
parse: true
});
delete response.words;
}
return response;
}
});
})();
What the localStorage does is stores the ListModels, but if I add anything to the words collection it soon disappears after I refresh.
Any ideas how I should be saving the entire nested collection?
So got this working and it came down to something in parse but also if you want to ensure you just get the attributes out of your nested collection you should override the toJSON otherwise you get the full collection in what this returns.
Backbone.Model.prototype.toJSON = function() {
var json = _.clone(this.attributes);
for (var attr in json) {
if ((json[attr] instanceof Backbone.Model) || (json[attr] instanceof Backbone.Collection)) {
json[attr] = json[attr].toJSON();
}
}
return json;
};
The main thing that was breaking is in the parse. Is assigns words directly to the model,
this.words = new app.wordCollection(response.words, {
parse: true
});
but this means that it will not show up when toJSON is called as it is not in the attributes (it also means you can't access it via model.get)
so this should be changed to
initialize: function () {
// because initialize is called after parse
_.defaults(this.attributes, {
words: new app.WordCollection()
});
},
parse: function (response) {
if (_.has(response, "words")) {
this.attributes.words = new app.WordCollection(response.words, {
parse: true
});
delete response.words;
}
return response;
}
this way it is added to the attributes of the model on not directly on the model. If you look at this fiddle http://jsfiddle.net/leighking2/t2qcc7my/ and keep hitting run it will create a new model in the collection, save it in local storage then print the results to the console. each time you hit run you should see it grow by 1 (as it gets the previous results local storage) and contain the full information that you want.