Modernizr provides a testAllProps() method which conveniently tests all the vendor prefixed styles of the one given to see if the style is supported by the currently running browser.
However I have no come to a point where I need to actually assign these properties from javascript because of various reasons that boil down to it being too cumbersome to conditionally link CSS files.
So for instance I could build an array and a routine which assigns each vendor specific style to the style of my target element:
['mozTransitionDuration', 'webkitTransitionDuration', 'oTransitionDuration', 'msTransitionDuration', 'transitionDuration'].map(function(s){ element.style.s = "style_setting"; });
Well, this will probably generate a bunch of errors because I will try to assign "style_setting" to 4 or 5 undefined values.
Does anybody know anything to make this a bit less painful?
Probably best to use an existing library that knows all about this stuff:
Prefix Free will let you assign styles from CSS without vendor-prefixing. There is also a jQuery Plugin for it that will allow you to do the same from JavaScript.
Before setting the value, check whether the property is undefined:
['mozTransitionDuration', 'webkitTransitionDuration', 'oTransitionDuration', 'msTransitionDuration', 'transitionDuration']
.map(function(s) {
if (element.style[s] != undefined) element.style[s] = "style_setting";
});
Related
We have a corporate content management system that allows for rich text editing/html markup, but does not allow for head elements or style sheets to be uploaded, attached, or used in any way. It provides some rich text editing controls and also access to the source html, but just for the html fragment -- there is no head, no body. We also have no access the whole system that presents these bits of markup on the page. The only way to style the content is through inline style attributes on the elements. It is best, it isn't pretty, but that is what we have and I'm trying to make the best of a bad situation.
We also have high standards for visual presentation and would like to be able to quickly produce and modify/update content and keep it looking nice. It is difficult to correctly apply formatting using the system. For anybody who has tried to markup anything more than a paragraph or two with an RTE, you probably know what I mean. It seems like we should have a different system, but has anybody worked for a large company before? Just sayin.
We do have access to another location where we could "author" and "store" actual styled content and then "compile it" for copypasta into the other system. In other words, we could author/design using css and best practices and then we could run some code that could convert those element, class, and id formatting into inline styles.
I did my research and found this thread which also lead me to this code.
These both are very helpful in exploring solutions, but I've run into an issue. These solutions use the javascript getComputedStyle() method. There are some other options for properties to only look at other properties or to be recursive on the children of the element provide, but basically it boils down to this. (Since getComputeStyle returns an object and not an array, there is also a prototype/polyfill to allow iterating over an object with forEach, but none of that is part of the issue I'm facing.)
const computedStyle = getComputedStyle(element);
computedStyle.forEach(property => {
element.style[property] = computedStyle.getPropertyValue(property);
});
This works well for css attributes like font-size:24px or margin:0 15px. The issue I'm running into are when I'm using units other than px. For example, if I'm trying to make something that has width:50%. getComputedStyle() converts the 50% to the actual number of pixels that 50% is currently using.
In the notes section of the MDN web docs I see that this is expected behavior. Although I'm not quite clear on what that last line means.
...An example difference between pre- and post-layout values includes the
resolution of percentages for width or height, as those will be
replaced by their pixel equivalent only for used values.
So what I'm trying to do is convert something like this
.container{width:50%;}
<div class="container">
into something like this
<div class="container" style="width:50%">
Does anyone know of a way to complete this type of transformation?
PS: If it matters we'll be using the more basic attributes in our css -- no transitions, grid, prefixing, etc. We still need to support IE 11 -- if that tells you anything. We won't need to account for every edge case or browser. Just some basic stuff so that all our H1 look the same.
Couldn't find any way to do this using the built in getComputedStyle(). It also returned too many properties that I wasn't interested in. So I came up with a different approach. Basically to use the same function to loop through an element (and maybe all its children elements) and the use Element.matches() to get all the css rules that apply to the element and apply the properties as they were specified in the stylesheet.
I modified this answer a bit to get the rules from the stylesheet.
Has the added benefit that we can pull either from all the document stylesheets or just from a specific one that is needed for preparing the code to go into our content management systems's rich text editor.
function applyInline(element, recursive = true) {
if (!element) {
throw new Error("No element specified.");
}
const matches = matchRules(element);
// we need to preserve any pre-existing inline styles.
var srcRules = document.createElement(element.tagName).style;
srcRules.cssText = element.style.cssText;
matches.forEach(rule => {
for (var prop of rule.style) {
let val = srcRules.getPropertyValue(prop) || rule.style.getPropertyValue(prop);
let priority = rule.style.getPropertyPriority(prop);
element.style.setProperty(prop,val,priority);
}
});
if (recursive) {
element.children.forEach(child => {
applyInline(child, recursive);
});
}
}
function matchRules(el, sheets) {
sheets = sheets || document.styleSheets;
var ret = [];
for (var i in sheets) {
if (sheets.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
var rules = sheets[i].rules || sheets[i].cssRules;
for (var r in rules) {
if (el.matches(rules[r].selectorText)) {
ret.push(rules[r]);
}
}
}
}
return ret;
}
I have a page with a short form to input some less values. I then want to take those values and recompile the less (from within the browser, with less.modifyVars(); ), but be able to specify the target file. This is so that I can access it from an iframe from within the page.
Does anyone know how I can specify a target for less compilation in the browser?
I'm not too familiar with in-browser "less.js" usage so this is quite rough answer.
Basically, no, you can't specify a target for automatic compilation.
#1
So you will have to explicitly parse a less file of interest into a string containing the result CSS styles and then apply these result styles to whatever HTML target you need. E.g. using javascript:
var parser = new(less.Parser)(options);
parser.parse(less_src_string, function (err, tree) {
var css_result_string;
if (err) {
// handle errors
} else {
css_result_string = tree.toCSS(env);
}
// ...
});
I'm not aware of any good examples/demos of such in-browser LESS usage so I'm afraid the less.js and lessc sources themselves are the only documentation for this stuff.
#2
The other way around is to do it in reverse, i.e. instead of including "less.js" into the frame where you set your variables, include it into your target frame and then set your config frame script to use modifyVars() of the less object defined in the target frame. That could be much more simple than #1.
I'm working with some legacy code where the original developers made heavy use of generating HTML DOM nodes with a non-standard attribute named translate
<span translate="[{"shown":"My Account","translated":"My Account","original":"My Account","location":"Text","scope":"Mage_Customer"}]">My Account</span>
and then traversing/searching for those nodes with javascript code like the following.
if (!$(target).match('*[translate]')) {
target = target.up('*[translate]');
}
The problem I'm trying to solve is, it appears that Google Chrome automatically adds a translate attribute to every DOM node in the document, and that this DOM node's value is a boolean true. You can see this by running the following Javascript from Chrome's javascript console
> document.getElementsByTagName('p')[0].translate
true
>
Is there anyway to tell Chrome not to populate these attributes? Their presence is wrying havoc with the legacy code. PrototypeJS's match and up nodes treat these boolean object attributes as matches, while the code I'm dealing with is specifically looking for DOM nodes with an attribute named translate. I'd like to find a solution for my problem that doesn't involved rewriting the old Javascript to use methods like hasAttribute.
I tried (as a wild guess) adding the meta attributes mentioned in this article,
<meta name=”google” value=”notranslate”>
<meta name=”google” content=”notranslate”>
but the nodes in the page still has a boolean true translate attribute.
(if it matters, this is Magento's inline translation system I'm talking about here)
The best I've been able to come up with so far is going through every DOM element in the page defining a getter that checks for the existence of an attribute. (the Object.__defineGetter__ guard clause ensures no errors in browsers that don't support modern Javascript)
if(Object.__defineGetter__)
{
var hasTranslateAttribute = function(){
return $(this).hasAttribute("translate");
};
document.observe("dom:loaded", function() {
$$('*').each(function(theElement){
theElement.__defineGetter__("translate", hasTranslateAttribute);
});
});
}
I tried defining a getting on Object.prototype and Element.prototype, but it seems like the browser's native translate is defined higher up the chain, so you need to redefine things on a per element basis.
Replace the nonstandard attribute translate by an attribute like data-translate, which is virtually guaranteed to be and to remain undefined in HTML specifications and in browsers. The data-* attributes were invented to prevent issues like this, and they can also be used to fix them.
Is there a way to assign attributes in a more compact manner
I dont really want to use setAttribute as it seems to be buggy in ie8
This list is for all attributes so its quite long
else if(a=="textalign")
{
e.style.textAlign="";
e.align=v
}
if(a=="textalign")
{
e.style.textAlign="";
e.align=v
}
I don't know why you are trying to set alignment via an HTML attribute rather than just using the CSS... this is much less reliable as there are many elements which have no align attribute. HTML align is also deprecated and should be avoided in general.
You don't say what the “other attributes” are that you might want to set. If you are talking specifically about HTML attribute properties it's easy to set them by a name in a string:
e[a]= v;
But then you need a to be the HTML attribute property name, which would be ‘align’ not ‘textalign’. It wouldn't do anything special to try to workaround CSS overrides like textAlign, because there is no automated way to do that, and the interaction between the deprecated HTML styling attributes and CSS is ill-defined. Stick to attributes or CSS (CSS is highly preferable); don't use both.
If you are talking about setting any CSS style property, as I might guess from the name being ‘textalign’, that's done similarly:
e.style[a]= v;
But then, again, you'd want to be using the exact style property name ‘textAlign’ not ‘textalign’.
If you want to set CSS style properties by their CSS name, like ‘text-align’, you could transform that to the DOM name automatically:
// convert foo-bar-baz to fooBarBaz
//
var doma= a.replace(/-([a-z])/g, function(m, g) {
return g.toUpperCase();
});
e.style[a]= v;
If you really do need to use case-lossy names like ‘textalign’ you'd have to use a lookup of all property names you wanted to use to get the case back:
var propernames= ['textAlign', 'borderColor', 'paddingTop']; // etc
for (var i= propernames.length; i-->0;)
if (propernames[i].toLowerCase()===a)
a= propernames[i];
e.style[a]= v;
Forget setAttribute. It has nothing to do with style properties (it's a bug in IE6-7 that it even works on styles there), and you shouldn't use it on elements either for HTML documents, as there are other IE6-7 bugs to contend with there. Stick to the ‘DOM Level 2 HTML’ direct property access stuff, which is more reliable and easier to read.
Use a class instead of giving all the attribute values.
.testClass
{
// set all attribute values here
}
e.className = "test";
See
element.className
Use some framework such as JQuery, it takes care of all of your browser incompatibility issues. In JQuery you use the .css('attributeName', 'value')method.
jQuery would make that easy with .attr({attr1: val, attr2: val}) etc. It would also shield you from many cross-browser compatibility bugs.
I'm trying to find a way that will add / update attribute using JavaScript. I know I can do it with setAttribute() function but that doesn't work in IE.
You can read here about the behaviour of attributes in many different browsers, including IE.
element.setAttribute() should do the trick, even in IE. Did you try it? If it doesn't work, then maybe
element.attributeName = 'value' might work.
What seems easy is actually tricky if you want to be completely compatible.
var e = document.createElement('div');
Let's say you have an id of 'div1' to add.
e['id'] = 'div1';
e.id = 'div1';
e.attributes['id'] = 'div1';
e.createAttribute('id','div1')
These will all work except the last in IE 5.5 (which is ancient history at this point but still is XP's default with no updates).
But there are contingencies, of course.
Will not work in IE prior to 8:e.attributes['style']
Will not error but won't actually set the class, it must be className:e['class'] .
However, if you're using attributes then this WILL work:e.attributes['class']
In summary, think of attributes as literal and object-oriented.
In literal, you just want it to spit out x='y' and not think about it. This is what attributes, setAttribute, createAttribute is for (except for IE's style exception). But because these are really objects things can get confused.
Since you are going to the trouble of properly creating a DOM element instead of jQuery innerHTML slop, I would treat it like one and stick with the e.className = 'fooClass' and e.id = 'fooID'. This is a design preference, but in this instance trying to treat is as anything other than an object works against you.
It will never backfire on you like the other methods might, just be aware of class being className and style being an object so it's style.width not style="width:50px". Also remember tagName but this is already set by createElement so you shouldn't need to worry about it.
This was longer than I wanted, but CSS manipulation in JS is tricky business.
Obligatory jQuery solution. Finds and sets the title attribute to foo. Note this selects a single element since I'm doing it by id, but you could easily set the same attribute on a collection by changing the selector.
$('#element').attr( 'title', 'foo' );
What do you want to do with the attribute? Is it an html attribute or something of your own?
Most of the time you can simply address it as a property: want to set a title on an element? element.title = "foo" will do it.
For your own custom JS attributes the DOM is naturally extensible (aka expando=true), the simple upshot of which is that you can do element.myCustomFlag = foo and subsequently read it without issue.