What does the jQuery function $('#myelement').is('*') do? - javascript

What does the following code do:
$('#myelement').is('*')
What does the asterisk signify? Since there is only one element, #myelement, I can't understand the point of using is(), which checks if an element matches a set of elements?

This is some seriously existential JavaScript.
$('#myelement').is('*')
It will fail whenever #myelement doesn't exist, and return true otherwise.

Basically check to see if an element exists or not. Not the best method...

is checks the element fits the criteria. In this case, "*" means all elements.
So, it simply returns true if the previous selector returns anything.
Take a look here for an example: http://jsfiddle.net/b7DwB/

http://api.jquery.com/is/
Pretty much what it does well from my understanding of it at least, and how I tend to use it. Is return true or false on whatever its called on.
Example I have a checkbox that I want to make sure is checked before I submit my form via AJAX I would do something like
if( $('input#tosCheck').is(':checked') ){
/*its checked submit form*/
}else{
alert('Error');
}
All in all the link to the API from jQuery better describes it then I ever could, but I wanted to at least share an example of use to help you gauge some idea.

Can't say I've ever seen that jQuery code used before, but it seems to be a poor way of checking for the existence of an element. Since * is the universal selector, the expression in question will always return true if #myelement exists, otherwise it will return false.
I say this is a "poor" way of checking the existence of an element because you can simply check the length of the jQuery object instead:
$('#myelement').length > 0
I haven't done any testing, but I assume the above is faster since it doesn't have the overhead of the is() function call.

Related

Find Text and Clone with jQuery

I have this sorta working without the if statement, but I'm not sure why it's not working when I used the if statement and with $(this).
So this:
if ($('.class--item:contains("Some random text items")'))
{
$(this).parent().clone().appendTo($(".other--class"));
}
Does not work. But this one does:
$('.class--item:contains("Some random text items")').parent().clone().appendTo($(".other--class"));
I'm not completely sure why one would work over the other, but I'm pretty sure I'm missing something. I'm also wondering if it's better to use one over the other as well since the if statement could offer some other "checking" rather than just "look for thing and clone it"
From the documentation you are using :contains() Selector but this does not return a boolean value. Instead, you should try jQuery.contains, which does return a boolean.

What does $($(this)) mean?

I saw some code around the web that uses the following statement
if ($($(this)).hasClass("footer_default")) {
$('#abc')
.appendTo($(this))
.toolbar({position: "fixed"});
}
What is the use of $($(this)) and why is that necessary here?
Yes, $($(this)) is the same as $(this), the jQuery() or $() function is wonderfully idempotent. There is no reason for that particular construction (double wrapping of this), however, something I use as a shortcut for grabbing the first element only from a group, which involves similar double wrapping, is
$($('selector')[0])
Which amounts to, grab every element that matches selector, (which returns a jQuery object), then use [0] to grab the first one on the list (which returns a DOM object), then wrap it in $() again to turn it back into a jQuery object, which this time only contains a single element instead of a collection. It is roughly equivalent to
document.querySelectorAll('selector')[0];, which is pretty much
document.querySelector('selector');
You can wrap $ as many times as you want, it won't change anything.
If foo is a DOM element, $(foo) will return the corresponding jQuery object.
If foo is a jQuery object, $(foo) will return the same object.
That's why $($(this)) will return exactly the same as $(this).
There is no specific need for double-wrapping and $($(this)) is exactly the same as $(this).
That said, I once found this double-wrapping in one file in my project, committed by another developer. Tracking the changes through revision, turned out that it started as $($(this).find('selector').first()) - that is, the result of some selector was wrapped to create a new object. Then for whatever reasons, the selector was removed and only the double-wrapping of this remained. Needless to say, on the next commit it was changed to $(this).
As explained before me, $($(this)) and $(this) are absolutely identical. jQuery returns the same jQuery object if you try to wrap it more than once.
Additionally, for performance considerations it is a good practice to reuse jQuery objects - it is quite expensive to create jQuery objects, especially the ones with complex selectors. Example:
var $this = $(this);
if ($this.hasClass("footer_default")) {
$('#abc')
.appendTo($this)
.toolbar({position: "fixed"});
}
Just google for 'jQuery best practices' - it will take a 30 min for you to learn these basics and you will use jQuery way more effectively.
There is no meainig of doing that.
The following code return the same:
console.log($($(this)).hasClass("footer_default"))
console.log($(this).hasClass("footer_default"))
a boolean value depenging on if the selected element has or not the class footer_default:
.hasClass( className )Returns: Boolean
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/IrvinDominin/aSzFn/
$(this) and $($(this)) both return jquery object.
There is no difference between these two.

How do I find out whether an element with that ID exists or not?

I do a:
console.log($('#test'));
I know that test doesn't exist. If I do a console.log, it doesn't output undefined/null. Rather it ouputs something like an empty array and when I check that array it looks like it returns the jQuery object itself.
I also tried:
if ($('#test')){
//do something
}
But it still doesn't work. I want to know whether the ID I am selecting exists on page or not. How do I do that using jQuery?
It's something like 20x faster to do this:
if (document.getElementById("test"))
compared to the jQuery operation to just determine if a DOM object with that id exists in the page. jQuery can do a lot for you, but when its general selector engine and general object structure isn't needed, it's not the quickest way to do things.
As others have said, $("#test") is always a valid jQuery object, even if #testdoesn't exist. If the #test object doesn't exist, then $("#test") will be a jQuery object that has no DOM objects in it (the internal array will have a .length === 0), but it's still a valid object.
In JavaScript, objects are always truthy, so using it in that fashion will always pass the condition.
You need to check the length property. A response of 0 is falsy, and will work as expected.
if ($('#test').length) {
// ...
}
This is unlike document.getElementById(), which returns null if the element with that id attribute does not exist.
If this is confusing, you could always write a quick jQuery plugin.
$.fn.exists = function() {
return !!this.length;
};
You can then call exists() on a jQuery collection, to ensure that selector has matched at least one item.
Use '(' and ')' for 'if' statements, and check if the returned array has length greater than 0:
if ($('#test').length > 0){
//do something
}
use something like this
if ($('#test').length > 0){
alert('hi')
}else
{
alert('hello')
}
Live Demo ​
Use
if ($('#test').length > 0){
//do something
}
the length tells you how many items were selected if it is 0 no element has the id test.
best way for this is to check length of the selected element
if ($('#test').length > 0){
//do something
}
But if you want to create a exist function jQuery welcomes you just add the line in your script
jQuery.fn.exists = function(){return this.length>0;}
and now you can Check if element exist or not
if ($(selector).exists()) {
// Do something
}
console.log($('#test'));
This won't print the value because it represents the object found in the DOM with the id test.
If you want to get values, use $("#test").val(); or $("#test").html();
If you want to check existence, do the length test as suggested above.
Also, if you're testing for the existence of a generated element (something you added to the DOM), make sure you checkout .live (http://api.jquery.com/live/). This is need for all elements that are created after the page is loaded.

What happens if a JavaScript event-listener is called and target element is missing?

For the moment, we're loading site-wide event-listeners from a single common.js file for a Rails project. We're aware of (most of) the trade-offs involved there, and are just trying to mitigate them. Once our basic architecture takes hold, we may move them off to separate files by controller or by view.
For the moment, the quick question is how we can activate them only when necessary, which begs the mangled, pseudo-zen question:
if an event-listener is declared in a forest when nobody is around to hear it, does it still make a sound?
In other words, if one declares a basic listener (i.e., nothing persistent like .live() or .delegate()) in the JavaScript for a given page, and the target element is not actually present on that given page, does anything really happen, other than the few cycles devoted to evaluating it and checking the DOM for the element? Is it active in memory, looking for that element? Something else? It never seems to throw an error, which is interesting, given that in other contexts a call like that would generate a null/nil/invalid type of error.
For instance:
$(document).ready(function () {
$('#element').bind('blur keyup', function);
}
Assume that #element isn't present. Does anything really happen? Moreover is it any better to wrap it in a pre-filter like:
$(document).ready(function () {
if ($('#element')) {
$('#element').bind('blur keyup', function);
}
Or, are the .js interpreters in the browsers smart enough to simply ignore a basic listener declared on an element that's not present at $(document).ready? Should we just declare the initial, simple form above, and leave it at that, or will checking for the element first somehow save us a few precious resources and/or avoid some hidden errors we're not seeing? Or is there another angle I'm missing?
JQuery was designed to work with 0+ selected elements.
If no elements were selected, nothing will happen.
Note that you will never get null when using jQuery selector. For example:
$('#IDontExist') // != null
$('#IDontExist').length === 0 // true (it's ajQuery object with
// zero selected elements).
The docs says:
If no elements match the provided selector, the new jQuery object is "empty"; that is, it contains no elements and has .length property of 0.
$('#element') if results into empty set then jQuery will not do anything.
Since jQuery always returns an object we can can call the methods on an empty set also but internally it will do the checking before applying it's logic.
Even if you want to check if the element exists before attaching the event handler you can use length property of jQuery object.
if ($('#element').length > 0) {
$('#element').bind('blur keyup', function);
}

Why doesn't IE7 think these two strings are equal?

I have an event handler that will remove an element from a list of the corresponding checkbox is unchecked. In the handler for the click event for the checkbox, first I copy the value of the label for that checkbox:
var label = $(this).next().html();
Then, I iterate over the list items and compare each of them to that label:
$("#sortable li").each(function() {
if ($(this).html() === label) {
$(this).remove();
}
});
In Internet Explorer 8 and in Firefox, this works exactly as I'd expect. In Internet Explorer 7, it does not. The condition in the "if" statement is never true. What am I missing here?
By request, the strings being compared are, "Charge" and "Charge" in one case.
Try alert(label) and alert($(this).html()) to see exactly what's being compared.
I'm not seeing any reason to use strict comparison (===), and you could conceivably benefit from using ordinary comparison (==).
As a method of doing what you're saying you want to do, this all seems pretty crazy. I'd always recommend identifying corresponding DOM elements by something more designed-for-the-purpose than their HTML contents, such as an ID.
Why don't you use the Script Debugger and see exactly why that comparison is false? Just set a breakpoint in the if and watch the variables.
The IE8 internal script debugger will help you, just switch to compatibility mode to run the script in the IE7 javascript runtime
Have you tried debugging it? Use alert to see what the two values hold, check that the function is actually called in IE7 and check that they have the same type.
Not an answer to your direct question, but here's another method that uses jQuery's data method to set and read a flag directly on the element:
$(this).next().data("toRemove", true);
//...
$("#sortable li").each(function() {
if ($(this).data("toRemove")) {
$(this).remove();
}
});
Of course, if you were manipulating label at any point then this wouldn't be what you want. I just mention this because .data() is a very useful jQuery feature that I haven't heard much about. I didn't even know about it until a week ago.

Categories

Resources