Develop Reference

Data Model's "serialize" function not called on property "set"ting

Also asked on Sencha's site here
My data model's "serialize" function is not called when I call
model.set("<fieldName>", <newValue>);
Here's a fiddle
I'm pretty unclear on why the serialize function isn't called...am I missing something, or is this a bug?
(And here's the code from the fiddle)
Ext.application({
name : 'Fiddle',
requires: [
"Ext.data.Store"
],
launch : function() {
var store = Ext.create("Ext.data.Store", {
data: [{Id: 0, Name: "Bill", Props: "{foo: 2, bar:{pan:5}}"}],
fields:[
{name: "Id", type: "int"},
{name: "Name", type: "string"},
{name: "Props",
convert: function(value, record){
console.log("called convert");
return Ext.JSON.decode(value);
},
serialize: function(value, record){
alert("never getting called!! :(");
console.log("sure, i'll put log here too..not getting called though");
return Ext.JSON.encode(value);
}
}
]
});
console.log(store.getAt(0));
var rec = store.getAt(0);
var newProp = {rec:"junk", foo: "orange"};
console.log(newProp);
rec.set("Props",newProp);
}
});

Mappings from source content (JSON/XML) to business model (Ext.data.Model) are not automatically created in ExtJS's data model system. As such, another step is needed to produce this relationship using mapping/associationsor something similar.
I.e. The data model doesn't store the original JSON to read/write from, which is fine for most cases. When a JSON string needs to be updated via ExtJS, one solution is to, on the model, set
convertOnSet
to false, allowing for custom manipulation of the JSON string via extract/update functions on the data model.

Backbone Menu Not Sorting

I'm having trouble getting a Backbone collection to sort properly. I inherited the project, so there may be some shenanigans someplace else, but I want to rule out any syntax error on my part.
The project uses a JSON file to handle the data:
"classifications": [
{
"name": "1 Bedroom",
"alias": "1BR",
"id": "1BR",
"menu_desc": "Residences"
},
{
"name": "2 Bedroom",
"alias": "2BR",
"id": "2BR",
"menu_desc": "Residences"
},
{
"name": "3 Bedroom",
"alias": "3BR",
"id": "3BR",
"menu_desc": "Residences"
},
{
"name": "4 Bedroom",
"alias": "4BR",
"id": "4BR",
"menu_desc": "Residences"
},
{
"name": "Common Areas",
"alias": "Common",
"id": "Common",
"menu_desc": "Resident Amenities"
}
]
Previously, there were no one-bedroom units, and the order in which it rendered was this:
I added the one-bedroom classification, and suddenly the order was this:
I did some digging and found documentation about the comparator property, but it only seems to apply to collections. This project doesn't use a collection for the classifications. It does for the submenu items (which floor the units are on, etc.), but not the main menu:
var MenuClassificationListView = Backbone.View.extend({
id: "classification_accordion",
template: _.template( "<% var classifications = this.options.classifications; _.each(this.collection.attributes, function(v,k) { %>"+
"<h3 class='<%= k %>'><%= classifications.get(k).get('name') %>"+
"<p><%=classifications.get(k).get('menu_desc')%></p></h3>"+
"<% var model = new MenuClassificationList(v); var view = new MenuClassificationItemView({collection:model, classification:k}); %>"+
"<% print(view.render().el.outerHTML); %>"+
"<% }); "+
"%>"),
render: function(){
//console.log(this.options.classifications);
//console.log(this.collection.attributes);
//alert(1);
this.$el.html(this.template());
return this;
}
});
How do I incorporate the comparator?
Thanks,
ty

One way could be to define a collection for the classifications, same way they are defined for the other items you mention:
var Classifications = Backbone.Collections.extend({ // etc. etc.
That way you can add the comparator and it will always be sorted.
Another way is to sort (http://underscorejs.org/#sortBy) the array in the initialize function in your view:
initialize: function(options) { // sorry don't remember the exact syntax for the parameters passed in, but I believe options is what you need
this.options.sortedclassifications = _sortBy(options.classifications, function (c) { return parseInt(c.id); }); // or any other sorting logic
}
Then in the template use the sorted classifications:
template: _.template( "<% var classifications = this.options.sortedclassifications; _.each(this.collection.attributes, function(v,k) { %>" + // etc. etc.
This should give you what you need. However, if I may add a personal opinion, I would go through the effort of defining a Collection for the classifications and a model for the single classification. Moreover, I would keep the MenuClassificationListView but also create a MenuClassificationView that will hold the single classification template.
In this way you are able to compose views, change rendering of the single classification without changing the list and scope the events to the inner views (so clicking on a single classification is handled by the single classification view). It makes everything cleaner, more composable and readable, in my opinion.

_.sortBy does not need to be used as Backbone collections already come with built in functionality for sorting.
See: http://backbonejs.org/#Collection-comparator
Example:
var SortedCollection = Backbone.Collection.extend({
comparator: 'key'
});
var mySortedCollection = new SortedCollection([{a:5, key:2}, {key:1}]);
console.log( mySortedCollection.toJSON() );
// [{key:1}, {a:5, key:2}]
However, the collection will not be automatically re-sorted when changing the key attribute. See:
mySortedCollection.at(0).set( 'key', 3 );
console.log( mySortedCollection.toJSON() );
// [{key:3}, {a:5, key:2}]
You have multiple options to solve this problem: you can manually call mySortedCollection.sort() or you can initialize the collection by binding its change:key event to re-sort the collection. The change:key event is triggered by the model whose key attribute is changed. This event is automatically propagated to the collection.
var AutoSortedCollection = Backbone.Collection.extend({
comparator: 'key',
initialize: function() {
this.listenTo( this, 'change:key', this.sort );
}
});
In addition, I suggest removing functionality from the templates. It is easy to debug Backbone Views, but it gets harder to read the stack trace as you move functionality inside the template string. You also enforce proper separation of concerns by using your Backbone View for preparing all data for presentation and your template should just display it.
var MyView = Backbone.View.extend({
//...
serializeData: function() {
return {
classifications: this.collection.toJSON(),
keys: this.collection.length > 0 ? this.collection.at(0).keys() : []
}; // already sorted
}
render: function() {
this.$el.html(this.template( this.serializeData() ));
}
});
Your template string becomes much easier to read: you can directly use the variables classifications and keys, iterate on them with _.each and simply reference to values without having to deal with the Collection syntax.

Mapping JSON to backbone.js collections

Alright, it looks like I need a hint to point me in the right direction. This question is two part - working with mult-dimensional JSON and Collections of Collections from JSON.
Background
I have some JSON that is going to be retrieved from a server and have control over how it could be formatted.
Multi-Dimentional JSON
I'm having some trouble being able connecting the model to the parts in the JSON. Say I wanted to render just each of the posts author name, and the content of status in the sample JSON below. I'm having no problem getting the status into the model, but the author name I'm a bit confused how to get to it. From my understanding I have to override the parse.
Is this bad standards / is there a better JSON structure I should use? Would it be better to keep it as flat as possible? That is move the author name and photo up one level?
I was reading How to build a Collection/Model from nested JSON with Backbone.js but it is still a little unclear to me.
Collection in Collections
Is there a nice way to make a collection within a collection for backbone.js? I will have a collection of posts, and then would have a collection of comments on that post. As I'm developing in backbone is that even possible?
From what I understand in Backbone.js Collection of Collections and Backbone.js Collection of Collections Issue, it would look something like this?
var Comments = Backbone.Model.extend({
defaults : {
_id : "",
text : "",
author : ""
}
})
var CommentsCollection = Backbone.Collection.extend({ model : Comments })
var Posts = Backbone.Model.extend({
defaults : {
_id : "",
author : "",
status : "",
comments : new CommentsCollection
}
})
var PostsCollection = Backbone.Collection.extend({ model : Posts })
Sample JSON
{
"posts" : [
{
"_id": "50f5f5d4014e045f000002",
"author": {
"name" : "Chris Crawford",
"photo" : "http://example.com/photo.jpg"
},
"status": "This is a sample message.",
"comments": [
{
"_id": "5160eacbe4b020ec56a46844",
"text": "This is the content of the comment.",
"author": "Bob Hope"
},
{
"_id": "5160eacbe4b020ec56a46845",
"text": "This is the content of the comment.",
"author": "Bob Hope"
},
{
...
}
]
},
{
"_id": "50f5f5d4014e045f000003",
"author": {
"name" : "Chris Crawford",
"photo" : "http://example.com/photo.jpg"
},
"status": "This is another sample message.",
"comments": [
{
"_id": "5160eacbe4b020ec56a46846",
"text": "This is the content of the comment.",
"author": "Bob Hope"
},
{
"_id": "5160eacbe4b020ec56a46847",
"text": "This is the content of the comment.",
"author": "Bob Hope"
},
{
...
}
]
},
{
...
}
]}
I appreciate even any hints to guild me. Thanks!

It can be overwhelming when trying to write up code to make it work for nested objects. But to make it simpler lets break it up into smaller manageable pieces.
I would think in these lines.
Collections
Posts
Comments
Models
Post
Comment
Author
Main collection -- Posts collection
(Which contains list of Post Models)
And each model in the Posts collection will have 3 sets of attributes(May not be the right term).
1st - level of attributes (status , id).
2nd - Author attribute which can be placed in a separate Model(Authod Model).
3rd - Collection of comments for each Post Model.
Collection in Collections would be a bit confusing here.
As you would have Models in Collection(Post Model inside Posts Collection) and each Model will nest a collection again(Comments collection inside Post Model). Basically you would be Handling a Collection inside a Model.
From my understanding I have to override the parse.
Is this bad standards / is there a better JSON structure I should use?
It is a perfectly plausible solution to handle the processing this in the Parse method. When you initialize a Collection or a Model , Parse methods is first called and then initialize is called. So it is perfectly logical to handle the logic inside the Parse method and it is not at all a bad standard.
Would it be better to keep it as flat as possible?
I don't think it is a good idea to keep this flat at a single level, as the other data is not required on the first level in the first place.
So the way I would approach this problem is write up the parse method in the Post Model which processes the response and attach the Author model and Comments collection directly on the Model instead as an attribute on the Model to keep the attributes hash clean consisting of 1st level of Post data. This I feel will be cleaner and lot more scalable on the long run.
var postsObject = [{
"_id": "50f5f5d4014e045f000002",
"author": {
"name": "Chris Crawford",
"photo": "http://example.com/photo.jpg"
},
"status": "This is a sample message.",
"comments": [{
"_id": "5160eacbe4b020ec56a46844",
"text": "This is the content of the comment.",
"author": "Bob Hope"
}, {
"_id": "5160eacbe4b020ec56a46845",
"text": "This is the content of the comment.",
"author": "Bob Hope"
}]
}, {
"_id": "50f5f5d4014e045f000003",
"author": {
"name": "Brown Robert",
"photo": "http://example.com/photo.jpg"
},
"status": "This is another sample message.",
"comments": [{
"_id": "5160eacbe4b020ec56a46846",
"text": "This is the content of the comment.",
"author": "Bob Hope"
}, {
"_id": "5160eacbe4b020ec56a46847",
"text": "This is the content of the comment.",
"author": "Bob Hope"
}]
}];
// Comment Model
var Comment = Backbone.Model.extend({
idAttribute: '_id',
defaults: {
text: "",
author: ""
}
});
// Comments collection
var Comments = Backbone.Collection.extend({
model: Comment
});
// Author Model
var Author = Backbone.Model.extend({
defaults: {
text: "",
author: ""
}
});
// Post Model
var Post = Backbone.Model.extend({
idAttribute: '_id',
defaults: {
author: "",
status: ""
},
parse: function (resp) {
// Create a Author model on the Post Model
this.author = new Author(resp.author || null, {
parse: true
});
// Delete from the response object as the data is
// alredy available on the model
delete resp.author;
// Create a comments objecton model
// that will hold the comments collection
this.comments = new Comments(resp.comments || null, {
parse: true
});
// Delete from the response object as the data is
// alredy available on the model
delete resp.comments;
// return the response object
return resp;
}
})
// Posts Collection
var Posts = Backbone.Collection.extend({
model: Post
});
var PostsListView = Backbone.View.extend({
el: "#container",
renderPostView: function(post) {
// Create a new postView
var postView = new PostView({
model : post
});
// Append it to the container
this.$el.append(postView.el);
postView.render();
},
render: function () {
var thisView = this;
// Iterate over each post Model
_.each(this.collection.models, function (post) {
// Call the renderPostView method
thisView.renderPostView(post);
});
}
});
var PostView = Backbone.View.extend({
className: "post",
template: _.template($("#post-template").html()),
renderComments: function() {
var commentsListView = new CommentsListView({
// Comments collection on the Post Model
collection : this.model.comments,
// Pass the container to which it is to be appended
el : $('.comments', this.$el)
});
commentsListView.render();
},
render: function () {
this.$el.empty();
// Extend the object toi contain both Post attributes
// and also the author attributes
this.$el.append(this.template(_.extend(this.model.toJSON(),
this.model.author.toJSON()
)));
// Render the comments for each Post
this.renderComments();
}
});
var CommentsListView = Backbone.View.extend({
renderCommentView: function(comment) {
// Create a new CommentView
var commentView = new CommentView({
model : comment
});
// Append it to the comments ul that is part
// of the view
this.$el.append(commentView.el);
commentView.render();
},
render: function () {
var thisView = this;
// Iterate over each Comment Model
_.each(this.collection.models, function (comment) {
// Call the renderCommentView method
thisView.renderCommentView(comment);
});
}
});
var CommentView = Backbone.View.extend({
tagName: "li",
className: "comment",
template: _.template($("#comment-template").html()),
render: function () {
this.$el.empty();
this.$el.append(this.template(this.model.toJSON()));
}
});
// Create a posts collection
var posts = new Posts(postsObject, {parse: true});
// Pass it to the PostsListView
var postsListView = new PostsListView({
collection: posts
});
// Render the view
postsListView.render();
Check Fiddle

(Edited to correct my initial misreading of the question.)
There's no need to override parse method of the model unless you want to change its structure. But it sounds like you don't need to -- to render the author name, just use author.name in the view:
<%= author.name %>
As far as initializing the nested collection, your approach is exactly right. All you have to do is convert the JSON object to Backbone models, and pass them to the PostsCollection (the Backbone.Collection constructor accepts an array of Backbone models, not raw JSON). One way of doing this is to use map:
var postModels = json.posts.map(function(post) { return new Posts(post); });
var posts = new PostsCollection(postModels);
Note that you'll need to do something similar in the initialize method of the Posts model -- retrieve the comments JSON array, and convert it to an array of Comments models:
initialize: function() {
if (attributes.comments && attributes.comments.length > 0) {
var commentModels = attributes.comments.map(function(comment) {
return new Comments(comment);
});
this.set("comments", new CommentsCollection(commentModels));
}
}
Here is working example.

Update, I found a SuperModel for backbone which provides relationships between models and between collections. It has proved to be a great solution for Collections within Collections as well as Deep Nested Model data.
Models are pre-defined with their relationships to other models via key. During the initialize/parse of the model any values in the JSON at that key gets passed off to a new related model or collection. A relationship is created between the two models/collections.
This means with the above example we can do something like this with our models:
Setup
var Author = Supermodel.Model.extend({});
var Post = Supermodel.Model.extend({});
var Comment = Supermodel.Model.extend({});
var Posts = Backbone.Collection.extend({
model: function(attrs, options) {
return Post.create(attrs, options);
}
});
var Comments = Backbone.Collection.extend({
model: function(attrs, options) {
return Comment.create(attrs, options);
}
});
Post.has().one('author', {
model: Author,
inverse: 'post'
}).many('comments', {
collection: Comments,
inverse: 'post'
});
//reverse relationships could also be setup
Usage
var posts = new Posts( postsObject ); //where postsObject is an array of posts
//With SuperModel, we are able to navigate the related models
posts.first().comments();
posts.first().comments().author();
posts.last().author();
Fiddle
Working Example in JSFiddle

Iteration in handlebar using backbone

I'm using backbone and handlebars for templating and i'm new to this.
My current json is in the below format and the code works fine.
[
{
"id": "10",
"info": {
"name": "data10"
}
},
{
"id": "11",
"info": {
"name": "data11"
}
}
]
But when i change my json structure to something like shown below i'm having difficulty in getting things to be populated.
{
"total_count": "10",
"dataElements": [
{
"id": "10",
"info": {
"name": "data10"
}
},
{
"id": "11",
"info": {
"name": "data11"
}
}
]
}
How can i populate name, info and total_count keeping the current code structure ?
JSFiddle : http://jsfiddle.net/KTj2K/1/
Any help really appriciated.

A few things that you need to do in order for this to work.
Replace Backbone's core 'reset' on your collection with a custom one that understands the data you are passing to it. For example:
reset: function (data) {
this.totalCount = data.total_count;
Backbone.Collection.prototype.reset.call(this, data.dataElements);
}
Now when you reset your collection, it will pull the total_count out of the object you are resetting it with, and use Backbone's core reset with the dataElement array. Keep in mind you may have to do a similar thing with 'parse' if you're intending on pulling this from the server.
I'd recommend that (if your example looks anything like the real code you're working with) you reset your collection before getting to rendering.
var dataCollectionList = new dataCollection();
dataCollectionList.reset(jsonData);
var App = new AppView({model : dataCollectionList});
Now in your view's "render" method you can grab the 'totalCount' property off the collection -
render : function() {
//Should spit the total count into the element, just as an example
this.$el.append(this.model.totalCount);
//or console.log it
console.log(this.model.totalCount);
return this;
}
Voila. Side note - as someone who works with Backbone a lot, it drives me nuts when people set an attribute of something like "model" (i.e. peopleModel, itemModel, etc) and it ends up being a backbone collection. It's much clearer to name it after what it is - though some MVC purists may disagree a bit.
Also, in this code block:
_.each(this.model.models, function (myData) {
$(this.el).append(new ItemView({model:myData}).render().el);
}, this);
You don't need to do _.each(this.model.models.......). Since you're working with a collection, the collection has a built in 'each' method.
this.model.each(function (myData) { ..... } , this);
Quite a bit cleaner.

Backbone JS complex model fetch

I have two backbone models, loaded from server:
var Model = Backbone.Model.extend({});
var SubModel = Backbone.Model.extend({});
var SubCollection = Backbone.Collection.extend({
model: SubModel
});
var m = new Model();
m.fetch({success: function(model)
{
model.submodels = new SubCollection();
model.submodels.url = "/sub/" + model.get("id");
model.submodels.fetch();
}});
So, the server has to send two separate responses. For example:
{ name: "Model1", id: 1 } // For Model fetch
and
[{ name: "Submodel1", id: 1 }, { name: "Submodel2", id: 2 }] // For Submodel collection fetch
Is there a way to fetch a Model instance with Submodel collection at once, like:
{
name: "Model1",
id: 1,
submodels: [{ name: "Submodel1", id: 2 }, { name: "Submodel1", id: 2 }]
}

To be able to do that is up to your back-end - it doesn't really have anything to do with Backbone.
Can you configure your back-end technology to return related models as nested resources?
If your back-end is Rails, for instance, and your models are related in ActiveRecord, one way of doing this is something like
respond_to do |format|
format.json { render :json => #model.to_json(:include => [:submodels])}
end
What back-end technology are you using?
Edit:
Sorry, misunderstood the gist of your question, once you've got your back-end returning the JSON in the proper format, yeah, there are things you need to do in Backbone to be able to handle it.
Backbone-Relational
One way to deal with it is to use Backbone-Relational, a plugin for handling related models.
You define related models through a 'relations' property:
SubModel = Backbone.RelationalModel.extend({});
SubCollection = Backbone.Collection.extend({
model: SubModel
});
Model = Backbone.RelationalModel.extend({
relations: [
{
type: 'HasMany',
key: 'submodels',
relatedModel: 'SubModel',
collectionType: 'SubCollection'
}
]
});
When your Model fetches the JSON, it will automatically create a SubCollection under the 'submodels' property and populate it with SubModels - one for each JSON object in the array.
jsfiddle for backbone-relational: http://jsfiddle.net/4Zx5X/12/
By Hand
You can do this by hand if you want as well. In involves overriding the parse function for your Model class (forgive me if my JS is not 100% correct - been doing CoffeeScript so much lately its hardwired in my brain)
var Model = Backbone.Model.extend({
parse: function(response) {
this.submodels = new SubCollection();
// Populate your submodels with the data from the response.
// Could also use .add() if you wanted events for each one.
this.submodels.reset(response.submodels);
// now that we've handled that data, delete it
delete response.submodels;
// return the rest of the data to be handled by Backbone normally.
return response;
}
});
parse() runs before initialize() and before the attributes hash is set up, so you can't access model.attributes, and model.set() fails, so we have to set the collection as a direct property of the model, and not as a "property" that you would access with get/set.
Depending on what you want to happen on "save()" you may have to override `toJSON' to get your serialized version of the model to look like what your API expects.
jsfiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/QEdmB/44/