I am building an application that has auth system and a lot of post requests,
I want to know how to make my backend endpoints accept only requests that are coming from my application, not from anything else like Postman.
For example, if a user submitted a registration form, a post request is sent to my backend with user info, how can I make sure this post request is coming from my application?
What I was thinking of, is saving a secret on the client’s side that is to be sent with each request to the backend, so that I can make sure the request is coming from my app.
I think SSL pinning is meant for this.
I know that anyone can access my app source code if they extract the APK file.
I want to make sure that no one can alter or steal my source code.
I read that I can make my code unreadable by Obfuscating it ( I still need to figure out how I am going to do that on my EAS build ), is this enough?
And I have to use JailMonkey to detect if the device is rooted.
I am using Expo secure store to save my sensitive info on the client side.
Is this approach good enough, is there anything I am missing?
I have zero information about security, this is just what I learned through searching.
Let me know if you have better suggestions.
Thank you in advance.
The Difference Between WHO and WHAT is Accessing the API Server
I want to know how to make my backend endpoints accept only requests that are coming from my application, not from anything else like Postman.
First, you need to understand the difference between WHO and WHAT is accessing the API Server to be in a better position to look for a solution to your problem.
I wrote a series of articles around API and Mobile security, and in the article Why Does Your Mobile App Need An Api Key? you can read in detail the difference between who and what is accessing your API server, but I will extract here the main takes from it:
The what is the thing making the request to the API server. Is it really a genuine instance of your mobile app, or is it a bot, an automated script or an attacker manually poking around your API server with a tool like Postman?
The who is the user of the mobile app that we can authenticate, authorize and identify in several ways, like using OpenID Connect or OAUTH2 flows.
So think about the who as the user your API server will be able to Authenticate and Authorize access to the data, and think about the what as the software making that request in behalf of the user.
When you grasp this idea and it's ingrained in your mindset, then you will look into mobile API security with another perspective and be able to see attack surfaces that you never though they existed before.
Certificate Pinning and MitM Atacks
What I was thinking of, is saving a secret on the client’s side that is to be sent with each request to the backend, so that I can make sure the request is coming from my app. I think SSL pinning is meant for this.
Certificate pinning on the mobile app side serves to guarantee that the app is talking only with your API server and not anything else, like when a MitM attack occurs and the app has its requests intercepted, and potentially modified and/or replayed, or simply saved to later extract the secrets from it.
Pinning doesn't guarantee to your API server that the request is coming indeed from what it expects, a genuine and unmodified version of your mobile app, "unless" you implement mutual pinning, that isn't encouraged to do so, because you will need to ship the private key for the API server certificate in the mobile app. Even if you do so, all an attacker needs to do is to extract the private key and will be able to communicate with your API server like if it was your genuine mobile app.
I don't have an article to implement pinning on a react-native mobile app but you can take a look to the one I wrote for Android to understand better all the process. Read my article Securing HTTPS with Certificate Pinning on Android on how you can implement certificate pinning and by the end you will understand how it can prevent a MitM attack.
In this article you have learned that certificate pinning is the act of associating a domain name with their expected X.509 certificate, and that this is necessary to protect trust based assumptions in the certificate chain. Mistakenly issued or compromised certificates are a threat, and it is also necessary to protect the mobile app against their use in hostile environments like public wifis, or against DNS Hijacking attacks.
You also learned that certificate pinning should be used anytime you deal with Personal Identifiable Information or any other sensitive data, otherwise the communication channel between the mobile app and the API server can be inspected, modified or redirected by an attacker.
Finally you learned how to prevent MitM attacks with the implementation of certificate pinning in an Android app that makes use of a network security config file for modern Android devices, and later by using TrustKit package which supports certificate pinning for both modern and old devices.
Bypassing Certificate Pinning
I think SSL pinning is meant for this.
The good news is that you already learned how good pinning is to prevent MitM attacks, now the bad news is that it can be bypassed, and yes I also wrote an article on how to it on Android (sorry to not be specific on react-native). If you want to learn the mechanics of it then read my article How to Bypass Certificate Pinning with Frida on an Android App:
Today I will show how to use the Frida instrumentation framework to hook into the mobile app at runtime and instrument the code in order to perform a successful MitM attack even when the mobile app has implemented certificate pinning.
Bypassing certificate pinning is not too hard, just a little laborious, and allows an attacker to understand in detail how a mobile app communicates with its API, and then use that same knowledge to automate attacks or build other services around it.
Code Obfuscation and Modifying Code
I know that anyone can access my app source code if they extract the APK file. I want to make sure that no one can alter or steal my source code.
Sorry, but once you release it to the public is up for grabs for everyone, even if heavily obfuscated its still possible to modify it statically or during runtime.
I read that I can make my code unreadable by Obfuscating it ( I still need to figure out how I am going to do that on my EAS build ), is this enough?
No, you can use the best obfuscation tool, but then an attacker well versed in deobuscation techniques will be able to understand your code and modify it statically or at runtime. Several open-source tools exist to ake this easy, and if you read the article to bypass certificate pinning then you already saw an example of doing it at runtime with Frida:
Inject your own scripts into black box processes. Hook any function, spy on crypto APIs or trace private application code, no source code needed. Edit, hit save, and instantly see the results. All without compilation steps or program restarts.
RASP - Runtime Application Self-Protection
And I have to use JailMonkey to detect if the device is rooted.
Using Frida the check can be modified to always return that the device is not rooted. Also JailMonkey may not detect all ways used to hide that a device is rooted, and this a moving target, because hackers and developers are in a constant cat and mouse game.
Sensitive Info Security
I am using Expo secure store to save my sensitive info on the client side.
Even when a secret is securely stored it will need to be used at some point, and the attacker will hook Frida to this point and extract the secret or do it in a MitM attack.
Possible Solutions
Is this approach good enough, is there anything I am missing?
From all I wrote it looks no matter what you are doomed to failure in properly secure your sensitive info and to guarantee that your API server knows that what is making the request is the genuine mobile app it expects, but security its all about of applying as many layers of defences as possible, like done in medieval castles, prisons, etc., because this will increase the level of effort, time and expertise required to succeed in an attack.
You now need to find a solution that allows you to detect MitM attacks, tampered and modified apk binaries, Frida present at runtime and that can deliver a runtime secret to mobile apps that pass a mobile app attestation that guarantees with a very high degree of confidence that such threats are not present. Unfortunately I don't know any open-source project that can deliver all this features, but a commercial solution exists (I work there), and if you want to learn more about you can read the article:
Hands-on Mobile App and API Security - Runtime Secrets Protection
In a previous article we saw how to protect API keys by using Mobile App Attestation and delegating the API requests to a Proxy. This blog post will cover the situation where you can’t delegate the API requests to the Proxy, but where you want to remove the API keys (secrets) from being hard-coded in your mobile app to mitigate against the use of static binary analysis and/or runtime instrumentation techniques to extract those secrets.
We will show how to have your secrets dynamically delivered to genuine and unmodified versions of your mobile app, that are not under attack, by using Mobile App Attestation to secure the just-in-time runtime secret delivery. We will demonstrate how to achieve this with the same Astropiks mobile app from the previous article. The app uses NASA's picture of the day API to retrieve images and descriptions, which requires a registered API key that will be initially hard-coded into the app.
Do You Want To Go The Extra Mile?
In any response to a security question I always like to reference the excellent work from the OWASP foundation.
For APIS
OWASP API Security Top 10
The OWASP API Security Project seeks to provide value to software developers and security assessors by underscoring the potential risks in insecure APIs, and illustrating how these risks may be mitigated. In order to facilitate this goal, the OWASP API Security Project will create and maintain a Top 10 API Security Risks document, as well as a documentation portal for best practices when creating or assessing APIs.
For Mobile Apps
OWASP Mobile Security Project - Top 10 risks
The OWASP Mobile Security Project is a centralized resource intended to give developers and security teams the resources they need to build and maintain secure mobile applications. Through the project, our goal is to classify mobile security risks and provide developmental controls to reduce their impact or likelihood of exploitation.
OWASP - Mobile Security Testing Guide:
The Mobile Security Testing Guide (MSTG) is a comprehensive manual for mobile app security development, testing and reverse engineering.
short answer you can't.
I want to know how to make my backend endpoints accept only requests
that are coming from my application, not from anything else like
Postman
the only thing you can do here is cors Cross-Site Request Forgery Prevention. Y to stop other servers from calling your api.
and you can't make only your application communicate with the server
you can hard code(parameters in the request) in the application to send to the server.but hackers can listen to request made from devices
I know that anyone can access my app source code if they extract the
APK file. I want to make sure that no one can alter or steal my source
code.
short answer you also can't
you can use ProGuard(native code) to obfuscate on native android and ios have compiled binary on release but those are not to js
so basically anyone can read your bundle js in plain text editor.
maybe in the future facebook can make something for hermes.
Which is the best way to notify a webapp (need to work in chrome and safari) from server? (my webapp is in angular for information).
Is it possible to receive UDP broacast with a webapp? (If not, that will not be a problem i can do a little app that will receive the broadcast and translate it to a notification but which is the best one for webapp that the question...)
This probably a double post but i didn't find a real example so if you can give me an example of what i need to do that gona be great :).
I'm not sure of what you want, but if you need to notify your webapp from server in real time you probably will be interested by websocket technology. You can get information about this subject here: https://developer.mozilla.org/fr/docs/WebSockets
If you use a nodeJs server, socket.io seems to be great and there are good exemples and documentation in the official website (http://socket.io/).
I am working on a project where i need my mobile application to talk to my web browser on a pc, where both devices are connected over wifi. The app would send data which would be received by the computer browser followed by some client side code execution. The browser then may send some feedback.
My initial approach is to make the app talk to an endpoint which in turn talks to client side of the browser (javascript).
What could be the best approach to do this ?
Update
I am not sure if Socket.io is a possible solution since it requires a server to be hosted. Is it possible to solve this using sockets ?
You've now edited your question to mention P2P. That's quite hard to achieve PHONE TO BROWSER (i.e., by hard I mean 6 to 12 man-months of work - and/or plain not possible). However in MOST situations you can instantly (ie "one line of code on each platform") resolve the problem by using a service like pubnub. Much as nobody has back-ends anymore and everything is just done with parse.com or game center, networking like you mention is now just done with pubunb (or any competitor).
This is an extremely common use case problem - and everyone just uses PubNub as mentioned below or one of its competitors.
These days it couldn't be easier, just use pubnub.com
It's the world's biggest data-messaging service for a reason!
There's essentially no other realistic approach, it's so simple - a few lines of code.
So short answer would be: A real peer-to-peer (P2P) communication is currently not possible with all browsers. So instead you have the following options:
App + Server with a WebUI (maybe)
App + Chrome App (Chrome Apps can start an web server, see http://www.devworx.in/news/misc/chrome-apps-can-now-run-a-web-server-135711.html)
App + WebApp with Plugin (Flash, Silverlight or Java)
I personally would prefer solution 1.
You need a server. If you consider this problem strictly from the typical firewall point of view, a PC or a mobile device are going to ignore connections unless they initiate the connection themselves. So neither the PC nor the mobile device can start a connection with the other.
My understanding is that web browsers do not support standard sockets within javascript. You can use the analagous websocket, but sockets and websockets are not directly compatible.
You can setup a simple server on the PC, and have this server relay messages between the mobile device and the PC browser. Both the mobile device and the PC browser connect to the server. This is basically what an external service will do for you.
PeerJS is what you're looking for:
http://peerjs.com
I know that for connecting to the database from JavaScript I need to mention the database credentials in plain JavaScript code. Therefore for a online application that would be a huge security risk. But in my case I want to write a small JavaScript application which is stored locally. So the credentials won't be shown to the world but just to the user I give the application, which is acceptable for me.
The motivation behind this is that I want to connect to an online database without a running PHP server, just from a JavaScript embedded in the local page. My goal is to provide an application that can be run by the user without the need for PHP and a server, except the database server. It's similar to a desktop application but running in the browser.
How can I connect from JavaScript to an online MySQL database? All other similar questions I found on Stack Overflow advices the thread starter against this usage for good reason but hadn't answered the question.
I heard that connecting to MySQL from JavaScript would be impossible. But how do, say, Windows 8 Metro Apps written in JavaScript handle that issue?
A backend repeater is always needed. For this issue you can set up a light-weight server that forwards your database accessing request to mysql server using, say node.js.
If you are focussing on a specific web browser, maybe you'll find a workaround. But if you're thinking on a local application independent from the user agent, you should follow the standards to reach a predictable behavior (or at least the best approach). In the W3C standards you have two options for storage:
Web Storage API: you're limited to key-value storage, but is very well supported.
Indexed Database API. I've no experience with it, but it's supported.
If you're not to limit the user context to a restricted machine and user agent, you can start with standard storage solutions as mentioned above and then enhance your app for more advanced browsers (perhaps even with MySQL!), as recommended in Progressive Enhancement
I have been working on creating an application that sends a string from an android phone to a server and from there sending it to a Chrome extension. I am sitting with a few options to continue, I can convert everything to websockets, I can use normal sockets for android to computer and websockets for extension to server, or I can do some HTTPRequest stuff.
I am looking for suggestions on the best way to pull off this communication. I have a php server an android application and a chrome extension that need to be connected. If there is a way to connect the android application to the chrome extension without the server I would be happy to hear that too.
I need something secure and something that can be organized based on the correct person asking or sending information. So when someone sends a string from the android application the server stores it (probably using their gmail) and when the extension asks for it the server sends it along.
Also could the server just push the string to the extension without the extension calling it? This would occur after the initial websocket connection. I guess it would just store the IP address or something like that.
Any suggestions or comments would be appreciated I am just trying to make the most efficient and secure system I can come up with. I have done a significant amount of research about every aspect so I'm more suffering from information overload then anything.
Thanks in advance :]
Look into Windows Communication Foundation Services (WCF). That's what I have been using for my android applications working with a database - the .NET framework is great, and the services seem to be fairly dynamic.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/netframework/aa663324