Develop Reference

Comparing two arrays in Javascript

I've got two arrays in Javascript which currently look like this, but are updated by HTTP requests (node):
var x = [[292,"2349","902103","9"],[3289,"93829","092","920238"]]
var y = [[292,"2349","902103","9"],[322,"93829","092","920238"],[924,"9320","8932","4329"]]
I'm looking to compare these arrays, so that, if there is an array inside y that is not in x, it will be saved to a new array - z. Note that sometimes the order of arrays inside the arrays will change, but I would not like this to affect the result.
If there is an array inside x that is not in y, however, is should not be saved to z.
I read JavaScript array difference and have been able to replicate this, but if the x array is not shown in y, it is printed to z. I am wondering if it is possible for this not to be stored, only the different items in y?

Use a higher-order function that accepts an array (which changes with each iteration of y) and returns a new function that operates on each element (nested array) in some. It returns true if the arrays contain the same elements regardless of order.
function matches(outer) {
return function (el) {
if (outer.length !== el.length) return false;
return el.every(function (x) {
return outer.indexOf(x) > -1;
});
}
}
Iterate over y and return a list of arrays that aren't in x.
function finder(x, y) {
return y.filter(function (el) {
return !x.some(matches(el));
});
}
finder(x, y);
DEMO

You can use this function arrayDiff.
It takes two arrays (A and B) and returns an array of all elements that are in the first array and not in the second (A \ B), with any duplicates removed. Two array elements are equal if their JSON serialization is the same.
var x = [[292,"2349","902103","9"],[3289,"93829","092","920238"]];
var y = [[292,"2349","902103","9"],[322,"93829","092","920238"],[924,"9320","8932","4329"]];
var z = arrayDiff(y, x);
// z is [[322,"93829","092","920238"],[924,"9320","8932","4329"]]
// arrayDiff :: [a], [a] -> [a]
function arrayDiff(a1, a2) {
let a1Set = toStringSet(a1),
a2Set = toStringSet(a2);
return Array.from(a1Set)
.filter(jsonStr => !a2Set.has(jsonStr))
.map(JSON.parse);
// toStringSet :: [a] -> Set<String>
function toStringSet(arr) {
return new Set(arr.map(JSON.stringify));
}
}

This should work even if the order in the inner arrays is different.
I'm assuming you will have only numbers and strings in there and you don't expect a strict comparison between them.
var x = [[292,"2349","902103","9"],[3289,"93829","092","920238"]];
var y = [[292,"2349","902103","9"],[322,"93829","092","920238"],[924,"9320","8932","4329"]];
// this will do y \ x
var z = arrDiff(y, x);
console.log(z);
function arrDiff(arr1, arr2) {
var rez = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arr1.length; i++) {
if ( ! contains(arr2, arr1[i])) {
rez.push(arr1[i]);
}
}
return rez;
}
function contains(arr, x) {
x = x.slice().sort().toString();
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
// compare current item with the one we are searching for
if (x === arr[i].slice().sort().toString()) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}

Try this:
function getArraysDiff(arr1, arr2) {
var x = arr1.map(function(a) { return a.join("") });
var y = arr2.map(function(a) { return a.join("") });
var z = [];
for ( var i = 0, l = arr1.length; i < l; i++ ) {
if ( y.indexOf(x[i]) == -1 ) {
z.push(arr1[i])
}
}
return z;
}
Or this:
x.filter((function(y) {
return function(x) {
return y.indexOf(x.join("")) > -1;
}
}( y.map(function(y) { return y.join("") }) )))

You can use Array.prototype.forEach(), Array.prototype.every(), Array.prototype.map(), Array.prototype.indexOf(), JSON.stringify(), JSON.parse()
var z = [];
y.forEach(function(val, key) {
var curr = JSON.stringify(val);
var match = x.every(function(v, k) {
return JSON.stringify(v) !== curr
});
if (match && z.indexOf(curr) == -1) z.push(curr)
});
z = z.map(JSON.parse);
var x = [
[292, "2349", "902103", "9"],
[3289, "93829", "092", "920238"]
];
var y = [
[292, "2349", "902103", "9"],
[322, "93829", "092", "920238"],
[924, "9320", "8932", "4329"]
];
var z = [];
y.forEach(function(val, key) {
var curr = JSON.stringify(val);
var match = x.every(function(v, k) {
return JSON.stringify(v) !== curr
});
if (match && z.indexOf(curr) == -1) z.push(curr)
});
z = z.map(JSON.parse);
console.log(z);
document.querySelector("pre").textContent = JSON.stringify(z, null, 2)
<pre></pre>

You have got 2 arrays:
var x = [[292,"2349","902103","9"],[3289,"93829","092","920238"]];
var y = [[292,"2349","902103","9"],[322,"93829","092","920238"],[924,"9320","8932","4329"]];
To create the Z array, you need the following function:
function createZ(){
var i,j,k=0,z=[],p=x;
for(j=0;j<y.length;j++){
for(i=0;i<p.length;i++){
if(y[j][0]===p[i][0] && y[j][1]===p[i][1] && y[j][2]===p[i][2] && y[j][3]===p[i][3]){
p.splice(i,1); break;
} else {
z[k++]=y[j]; console.log((y[j][0]===p[i][0])+" "+i+","+j);
}
}
}
return z;
}
Note that the createZ() also prints out the i,j of corresponding entry to the console.

Compare multiple arrays for common values [duplicate]

What's the simplest, library-free code for implementing array intersections in javascript? I want to write
intersection([1,2,3], [2,3,4,5])
and get
[2, 3]

Use a combination of Array.prototype.filter and Array.prototype.includes:
const filteredArray = array1.filter(value => array2.includes(value));
For older browsers, with Array.prototype.indexOf and without an arrow function:
var filteredArray = array1.filter(function(n) {
return array2.indexOf(n) !== -1;
});
NB! Both .includes and .indexOf internally compares elements in the array by using ===, so if the array contains objects it will only compare object references (not their content). If you want to specify your own comparison logic, use Array.prototype.some instead.

Destructive seems simplest, especially if we can assume the input is sorted:
/* destructively finds the intersection of
* two arrays in a simple fashion.
*
* PARAMS
* a - first array, must already be sorted
* b - second array, must already be sorted
*
* NOTES
* State of input arrays is undefined when
* the function returns. They should be
* (prolly) be dumped.
*
* Should have O(n) operations, where n is
* n = MIN(a.length, b.length)
*/
function intersection_destructive(a, b)
{
var result = [];
while( a.length > 0 && b.length > 0 )
{
if (a[0] < b[0] ){ a.shift(); }
else if (a[0] > b[0] ){ b.shift(); }
else /* they're equal */
{
result.push(a.shift());
b.shift();
}
}
return result;
}
Non-destructive has to be a hair more complicated, since we’ve got to track indices:
/* finds the intersection of
* two arrays in a simple fashion.
*
* PARAMS
* a - first array, must already be sorted
* b - second array, must already be sorted
*
* NOTES
*
* Should have O(n) operations, where n is
* n = MIN(a.length(), b.length())
*/
function intersect_safe(a, b)
{
var ai=0, bi=0;
var result = [];
while( ai < a.length && bi < b.length )
{
if (a[ai] < b[bi] ){ ai++; }
else if (a[ai] > b[bi] ){ bi++; }
else /* they're equal */
{
result.push(a[ai]);
ai++;
bi++;
}
}
return result;
}

If your environment supports ECMAScript 6 Set, one simple and supposedly efficient (see specification link) way:
function intersect(a, b) {
var setA = new Set(a);
var setB = new Set(b);
var intersection = new Set([...setA].filter(x => setB.has(x)));
return Array.from(intersection);
}
Shorter, but less readable (also without creating the additional intersection Set):
function intersect(a, b) {
var setB = new Set(b);
return [...new Set(a)].filter(x => setB.has(x));
}
Note that when using sets you will only get distinct values, thus new Set([1, 2, 3, 3]).size evaluates to 3.

Using Underscore.js or lodash.js
_.intersection( [0,345,324] , [1,0,324] ) // gives [0,324]

// Return elements of array a that are also in b in linear time:
function intersect(a, b) {
return a.filter(Set.prototype.has, new Set(b));
}
// Example:
console.log(intersect([1,2,3], [2,3,4,5]));
I recommend above succinct solution which outperforms other implementations on large inputs. If performance on small inputs matters, check the alternatives below.
Alternatives and performance comparison:
See the following snippet for alternative implementations and check https://jsperf.com/array-intersection-comparison for performance comparisons.
function intersect_for(a, b) {
const result = [];
const alen = a.length;
const blen = b.length;
for (let i = 0; i < alen; ++i) {
const ai = a[i];
for (let j = 0; j < blen; ++j) {
if (ai === b[j]) {
result.push(ai);
break;
}
}
}
return result;
}
function intersect_filter_indexOf(a, b) {
return a.filter(el => b.indexOf(el) !== -1);
}
function intersect_filter_in(a, b) {
const map = b.reduce((map, el) => {map[el] = true; return map}, {});
return a.filter(el => el in map);
}
function intersect_for_in(a, b) {
const result = [];
const map = {};
for (let i = 0, length = b.length; i < length; ++i) {
map[b[i]] = true;
}
for (let i = 0, length = a.length; i < length; ++i) {
if (a[i] in map) result.push(a[i]);
}
return result;
}
function intersect_filter_includes(a, b) {
return a.filter(el => b.includes(el));
}
function intersect_filter_has_this(a, b) {
return a.filter(Set.prototype.has, new Set(b));
}
function intersect_filter_has_arrow(a, b) {
const set = new Set(b);
return a.filter(el => set.has(el));
}
function intersect_for_has(a, b) {
const result = [];
const set = new Set(b);
for (let i = 0, length = a.length; i < length; ++i) {
if (set.has(a[i])) result.push(a[i]);
}
return result;
}
Results in Firefox 53:
Ops/sec on large arrays (10,000 elements):
filter + has (this) 523 (this answer)
for + has 482
for-loop + in 279
filter + in 242
for-loops 24
filter + includes 14
filter + indexOf 10
Ops/sec on small arrays (100 elements):
for-loop + in 384,426
filter + in 192,066
for-loops 159,137
filter + includes 104,068
filter + indexOf 71,598
filter + has (this) 43,531 (this answer)
filter + has (arrow function) 35,588

My contribution in ES6 terms. In general it finds the intersection of an array with indefinite number of arrays provided as arguments.
Array.prototype.intersect = function(...a) {
return [this,...a].reduce((p,c) => p.filter(e => c.includes(e)));
}
var arrs = [[0,2,4,6,8],[4,5,6,7],[4,6]],
arr = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9];
document.write("<pre>" + JSON.stringify(arr.intersect(...arrs)) + "</pre>");

How about just using associative arrays?
function intersect(a, b) {
var d1 = {};
var d2 = {};
var results = [];
for (var i = 0; i < a.length; i++) {
d1[a[i]] = true;
}
for (var j = 0; j < b.length; j++) {
d2[b[j]] = true;
}
for (var k in d1) {
if (d2[k])
results.push(k);
}
return results;
}
edit:
// new version
function intersect(a, b) {
var d = {};
var results = [];
for (var i = 0; i < b.length; i++) {
d[b[i]] = true;
}
for (var j = 0; j < a.length; j++) {
if (d[a[j]])
results.push(a[j]);
}
return results;
}

The performance of #atk's implementation for sorted arrays of primitives can be improved by using .pop rather than .shift.
function intersect(array1, array2) {
var result = [];
// Don't destroy the original arrays
var a = array1.slice(0);
var b = array2.slice(0);
var aLast = a.length - 1;
var bLast = b.length - 1;
while (aLast >= 0 && bLast >= 0) {
if (a[aLast] > b[bLast] ) {
a.pop();
aLast--;
} else if (a[aLast] < b[bLast] ){
b.pop();
bLast--;
} else /* they're equal */ {
result.push(a.pop());
b.pop();
aLast--;
bLast--;
}
}
return result;
}
I created a benchmark using jsPerf. It's about three times faster to use .pop.

If you need to have it handle intersecting multiple arrays:
const intersect = (a1, a2, ...rest) => {
const a12 = a1.filter(value => a2.includes(value))
if (rest.length === 0) { return a12; }
return intersect(a12, ...rest);
};
console.log(intersect([1,2,3,4,5], [1,2], [1, 2, 3,4,5], [2, 10, 1]))

Sort it
check one by one from the index 0, create new array from that.
Something like this, Not tested well though.
function intersection(x,y){
x.sort();y.sort();
var i=j=0;ret=[];
while(i<x.length && j<y.length){
if(x[i]<y[j])i++;
else if(y[j]<x[i])j++;
else {
ret.push(x[i]);
i++,j++;
}
}
return ret;
}
alert(intersection([1,2,3], [2,3,4,5]));
PS:The algorithm only intended for Numbers and Normal Strings, intersection of arbitary object arrays may not work.

Using jQuery:
var a = [1,2,3];
var b = [2,3,4,5];
var c = $(b).not($(b).not(a));
alert(c);

A tiny tweak to the smallest one here (the filter/indexOf solution), namely creating an index of the values in one of the arrays using a JavaScript object, will reduce it from O(N*M) to "probably" linear time. source1 source2
function intersect(a, b) {
var aa = {};
a.forEach(function(v) { aa[v]=1; });
return b.filter(function(v) { return v in aa; });
}
This isn't the very simplest solution (it's more code than filter+indexOf), nor is it the very fastest (probably slower by a constant factor than intersect_safe()), but seems like a pretty good balance. It is on the very simple side, while providing good performance, and it doesn't require pre-sorted inputs.

For arrays containing only strings or numbers you can do something with sorting, as per some of the other answers. For the general case of arrays of arbitrary objects I don't think you can avoid doing it the long way. The following will give you the intersection of any number of arrays provided as parameters to arrayIntersection:
var arrayContains = Array.prototype.indexOf ?
function(arr, val) {
return arr.indexOf(val) > -1;
} :
function(arr, val) {
var i = arr.length;
while (i--) {
if (arr[i] === val) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
};
function arrayIntersection() {
var val, arrayCount, firstArray, i, j, intersection = [], missing;
var arrays = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments); // Convert arguments into a real array
// Search for common values
firstArray = arrays.pop();
if (firstArray) {
j = firstArray.length;
arrayCount = arrays.length;
while (j--) {
val = firstArray[j];
missing = false;
// Check val is present in each remaining array
i = arrayCount;
while (!missing && i--) {
if ( !arrayContains(arrays[i], val) ) {
missing = true;
}
}
if (!missing) {
intersection.push(val);
}
}
}
return intersection;
}
arrayIntersection( [1, 2, 3, "a"], [1, "a", 2], ["a", 1] ); // Gives [1, "a"];

Simplest, fastest O(n) and shortest way:
function intersection (a, b) {
const setA = new Set(a);
return b.filter(value => setA.has(value));
}
console.log(intersection([1,2,3], [2,3,4,5]))
#nbarbosa has almost the same answer but he cast both arrays to Set and then back to array. There is no need for any extra casting.

Another indexed approach able to process any number of arrays at once:
// Calculate intersection of multiple array or object values.
function intersect (arrList) {
var arrLength = Object.keys(arrList).length;
// (Also accepts regular objects as input)
var index = {};
for (var i in arrList) {
for (var j in arrList[i]) {
var v = arrList[i][j];
if (index[v] === undefined) index[v] = 0;
index[v]++;
};
};
var retv = [];
for (var i in index) {
if (index[i] == arrLength) retv.push(i);
};
return retv;
};
It works only for values that can be evaluated as strings and you should pass them as an array like:
intersect ([arr1, arr2, arr3...]);
...but it transparently accepts objects as parameter or as any of the elements to be intersected (always returning array of common values). Examples:
intersect ({foo: [1, 2, 3, 4], bar: {a: 2, j:4}}); // [2, 4]
intersect ([{x: "hello", y: "world"}, ["hello", "user"]]); // ["hello"]
EDIT: I just noticed that this is, in a way, slightly buggy.
That is: I coded it thinking that input arrays cannot itself contain repetitions (as provided example doesn't).
But if input arrays happen to contain repetitions, that would produce wrong results. Example (using below implementation):
intersect ([[1, 3, 4, 6, 3], [1, 8, 99]]);
// Expected: [ '1' ]
// Actual: [ '1', '3' ]
Fortunately this is easy to fix by simply adding second level indexing. That is:
Change:
if (index[v] === undefined) index[v] = 0;
index[v]++;
by:
if (index[v] === undefined) index[v] = {};
index[v][i] = true; // Mark as present in i input.
...and:
if (index[i] == arrLength) retv.push(i);
by:
if (Object.keys(index[i]).length == arrLength) retv.push(i);
Complete example:
// Calculate intersection of multiple array or object values.
function intersect (arrList) {
var arrLength = Object.keys(arrList).length;
// (Also accepts regular objects as input)
var index = {};
for (var i in arrList) {
for (var j in arrList[i]) {
var v = arrList[i][j];
if (index[v] === undefined) index[v] = {};
index[v][i] = true; // Mark as present in i input.
};
};
var retv = [];
for (var i in index) {
if (Object.keys(index[i]).length == arrLength) retv.push(i);
};
return retv;
};
intersect ([[1, 3, 4, 6, 3], [1, 8, 99]]); // [ '1' ]

With some restrictions on your data, you can do it in linear time!
For positive integers: use an array mapping the values to a "seen/not seen" boolean.
function intersectIntegers(array1,array2) {
var seen=[],
result=[];
for (var i = 0; i < array1.length; i++) {
seen[array1[i]] = true;
}
for (var i = 0; i < array2.length; i++) {
if ( seen[array2[i]])
result.push(array2[i]);
}
return result;
}
There is a similar technique for objects: take a dummy key, set it to "true" for each element in array1, then look for this key in elements of array2. Clean up when you're done.
function intersectObjects(array1,array2) {
var result=[];
var key="tmpKey_intersect"
for (var i = 0; i < array1.length; i++) {
array1[i][key] = true;
}
for (var i = 0; i < array2.length; i++) {
if (array2[i][key])
result.push(array2[i]);
}
for (var i = 0; i < array1.length; i++) {
delete array1[i][key];
}
return result;
}
Of course you need to be sure the key didn't appear before, otherwise you'll be destroying your data...

function intersection(A,B){
var result = new Array();
for (i=0; i<A.length; i++) {
for (j=0; j<B.length; j++) {
if (A[i] == B[j] && $.inArray(A[i],result) == -1) {
result.push(A[i]);
}
}
}
return result;
}

For simplicity:
// Usage
const intersection = allLists
.reduce(intersect, allValues)
.reduce(removeDuplicates, []);
// Implementation
const intersect = (intersection, list) =>
intersection.filter(item =>
list.some(x => x === item));
const removeDuplicates = (uniques, item) =>
uniques.includes(item) ? uniques : uniques.concat(item);
// Example Data
const somePeople = [bob, doug, jill];
const otherPeople = [sarah, bob, jill];
const morePeople = [jack, jill];
const allPeople = [...somePeople, ...otherPeople, ...morePeople];
const allGroups = [somePeople, otherPeople, morePeople];
// Example Usage
const intersection = allGroups
.reduce(intersect, allPeople)
.reduce(removeDuplicates, []);
intersection; // [jill]
Benefits:
dirt simple
data-centric
works for arbitrary number of lists
works for arbitrary lengths of lists
works for arbitrary types of values
works for arbitrary sort order
retains shape (order of first appearance in any array)
exits early where possible
memory safe, short of tampering with Function / Array prototypes
Drawbacks:
higher memory usage
higher CPU usage
requires an understanding of reduce
requires understanding of data flow
You wouldn't want to use this for 3D engine or kernel work, but if you have problems getting this to run in an event-based app, your design has bigger problems.

I'll contribute with what has been working out best for me:
if (!Array.prototype.intersect){
Array.prototype.intersect = function (arr1) {
var r = [], o = {}, l = this.length, i, v;
for (i = 0; i < l; i++) {
o[this[i]] = true;
}
l = arr1.length;
for (i = 0; i < l; i++) {
v = arr1[i];
if (v in o) {
r.push(v);
}
}
return r;
};
}

A functional approach with ES2015
A functional approach must consider using only pure functions without side effects, each of which is only concerned with a single job.
These restrictions enhance the composability and reusability of the functions involved.
// small, reusable auxiliary functions
const createSet = xs => new Set(xs);
const filter = f => xs => xs.filter(apply(f));
const apply = f => x => f(x);
// intersection
const intersect = xs => ys => {
const zs = createSet(ys);
return filter(x => zs.has(x)
? true
: false
) (xs);
};
// mock data
const xs = [1,2,2,3,4,5];
const ys = [0,1,2,3,3,3,6,7,8,9];
// run it
console.log( intersect(xs) (ys) );
Please note that the native Set type is used, which has an advantageous
lookup performance.
Avoid duplicates
Obviously repeatedly occurring items from the first Array are preserved, while the second Array is de-duplicated. This may be or may be not the desired behavior. If you need a unique result just apply dedupe to the first argument:
// auxiliary functions
const apply = f => x => f(x);
const comp = f => g => x => f(g(x));
const afrom = apply(Array.from);
const createSet = xs => new Set(xs);
const filter = f => xs => xs.filter(apply(f));
// intersection
const intersect = xs => ys => {
const zs = createSet(ys);
return filter(x => zs.has(x)
? true
: false
) (xs);
};
// de-duplication
const dedupe = comp(afrom) (createSet);
// mock data
const xs = [1,2,2,3,4,5];
const ys = [0,1,2,3,3,3,6,7,8,9];
// unique result
console.log( intersect(dedupe(xs)) (ys) );
Compute the intersection of any number of Arrays
If you want to compute the intersection of an arbitrarily number of Arrays just compose intersect with foldl. Here is a convenience function:
// auxiliary functions
const apply = f => x => f(x);
const uncurry = f => (x, y) => f(x) (y);
const createSet = xs => new Set(xs);
const filter = f => xs => xs.filter(apply(f));
const foldl = f => acc => xs => xs.reduce(uncurry(f), acc);
// intersection
const intersect = xs => ys => {
const zs = createSet(ys);
return filter(x => zs.has(x)
? true
: false
) (xs);
};
// intersection of an arbitrarily number of Arrays
const intersectn = (head, ...tail) => foldl(intersect) (head) (tail);
// mock data
const xs = [1,2,2,3,4,5];
const ys = [0,1,2,3,3,3,6,7,8,9];
const zs = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6];
// run
console.log( intersectn(xs, ys, zs) );

.reduce to build a map, and .filter to find the intersection. delete within the .filter allows us to treat the second array as though it's a unique set.
function intersection (a, b) {
var seen = a.reduce(function (h, k) {
h[k] = true;
return h;
}, {});
return b.filter(function (k) {
var exists = seen[k];
delete seen[k];
return exists;
});
}
I find this approach pretty easy to reason about. It performs in constant time.

I have written an intesection function which can even detect intersection of array of objects based on particular property of those objects.
For instance,
if arr1 = [{id: 10}, {id: 20}]
and arr2 = [{id: 20}, {id: 25}]
and we want intersection based on the id property, then the output should be :
[{id: 20}]
As such, the function for the same (note: ES6 code) is :
const intersect = (arr1, arr2, accessors = [v => v, v => v]) => {
const [fn1, fn2] = accessors;
const set = new Set(arr2.map(v => fn2(v)));
return arr1.filter(value => set.has(fn1(value)));
};
and you can call the function as:
intersect(arr1, arr2, [elem => elem.id, elem => elem.id])
Also note: this function finds intersection considering the first array is the primary array and thus the intersection result will be that of the primary array.

This function avoids the N^2 problem, taking advantage of the power of dictionaries. Loops through each array only once, and a third and shorter loop to return the final result.
It also supports numbers, strings, and objects.
function array_intersect(array1, array2)
{
var mergedElems = {},
result = [];
// Returns a unique reference string for the type and value of the element
function generateStrKey(elem) {
var typeOfElem = typeof elem;
if (typeOfElem === 'object') {
typeOfElem += Object.prototype.toString.call(elem);
}
return [typeOfElem, elem.toString(), JSON.stringify(elem)].join('__');
}
array1.forEach(function(elem) {
var key = generateStrKey(elem);
if (!(key in mergedElems)) {
mergedElems[key] = {elem: elem, inArray2: false};
}
});
array2.forEach(function(elem) {
var key = generateStrKey(elem);
if (key in mergedElems) {
mergedElems[key].inArray2 = true;
}
});
Object.values(mergedElems).forEach(function(elem) {
if (elem.inArray2) {
result.push(elem.elem);
}
});
return result;
}
If there is a special case that cannot be solved, just by modifying the generateStrKey function, it could surely be solved. The trick of this function is that it uniquely represents each different data according to type and value.
This variant has some performance improvements. Avoid loops in case any array is empty. It also starts by walking through the shorter array first, so if it finds all the values of the first array in the second array, exits the loop.
function array_intersect(array1, array2)
{
var mergedElems = {},
result = [],
firstArray, secondArray,
firstN = 0,
secondN = 0;
function generateStrKey(elem) {
var typeOfElem = typeof elem;
if (typeOfElem === 'object') {
typeOfElem += Object.prototype.toString.call(elem);
}
return [typeOfElem, elem.toString(), JSON.stringify(elem)].join('__');
}
// Executes the loops only if both arrays have values
if (array1.length && array2.length)
{
// Begins with the shortest array to optimize the algorithm
if (array1.length < array2.length) {
firstArray = array1;
secondArray = array2;
} else {
firstArray = array2;
secondArray = array1;
}
firstArray.forEach(function(elem) {
var key = generateStrKey(elem);
if (!(key in mergedElems)) {
mergedElems[key] = {elem: elem, inArray2: false};
// Increases the counter of unique values in the first array
firstN++;
}
});
secondArray.some(function(elem) {
var key = generateStrKey(elem);
if (key in mergedElems) {
if (!mergedElems[key].inArray2) {
mergedElems[key].inArray2 = true;
// Increases the counter of matches
secondN++;
// If all elements of first array have coincidence, then exits the loop
return (secondN === firstN);
}
}
});
Object.values(mergedElems).forEach(function(elem) {
if (elem.inArray2) {
result.push(elem.elem);
}
});
}
return result;
}

Here is underscore.js implementation:
_.intersection = function(array) {
if (array == null) return [];
var result = [];
var argsLength = arguments.length;
for (var i = 0, length = array.length; i < length; i++) {
var item = array[i];
if (_.contains(result, item)) continue;
for (var j = 1; j < argsLength; j++) {
if (!_.contains(arguments[j], item)) break;
}
if (j === argsLength) result.push(item);
}
return result;
};
Source: http://underscorejs.org/docs/underscore.html#section-62

Create an Object using one array and loop through the second array to check if the value exists as key.
function intersection(arr1, arr2) {
var myObj = {};
var myArr = [];
for (var i = 0, len = arr1.length; i < len; i += 1) {
if(myObj[arr1[i]]) {
myObj[arr1[i]] += 1;
} else {
myObj[arr1[i]] = 1;
}
}
for (var j = 0, len = arr2.length; j < len; j += 1) {
if(myObj[arr2[j]] && myArr.indexOf(arr2[j]) === -1) {
myArr.push(arr2[j]);
}
}
return myArr;
}

I think using an object internally can help with computations and could be performant too.
// Approach maintains a count of each element and works for negative elements too
function intersect(a,b){
const A = {};
a.forEach((v)=>{A[v] ? ++A[v] : A[v] = 1});
const B = {};
b.forEach((v)=>{B[v] ? ++B[v] : B[v] = 1});
const C = {};
Object.entries(A).map((x)=>C[x[0]] = Math.min(x[1],B[x[0]]))
return Object.entries(C).map((x)=>Array(x[1]).fill(Number(x[0]))).flat();
}
const x = [1,1,-1,-1,0,0,2,2];
const y = [2,0,1,1,1,1,0,-1,-1,-1];
const result = intersect(x,y);
console.log(result); // (7) [0, 0, 1, 1, 2, -1, -1]

I am using map even object could be used.
//find intersection of 2 arrs
const intersections = (arr1,arr2) => {
let arrf = arr1.concat(arr2)
let map = new Map();
let union = [];
for(let i=0; i<arrf.length; i++){
if(map.get(arrf[i])){
map.set(arrf[i],false);
}else{
map.set(arrf[i],true);
}
}
map.forEach((v,k)=>{if(!v){union.push(k);}})
return union;
}

This is a proposed standard: With the currently stage 2 proposal https://github.com/tc39/proposal-set-methods, you could use
mySet.intersection(mySet2);
Until then, you could use Immutable.js's Set, which inspired that proposal
Immutable.Set(mySet).intersect(mySet2)

I extended tarulen's answer to work with any number of arrays. It also should work with non-integer values.
function intersect() {
const last = arguments.length - 1;
var seen={};
var result=[];
for (var i = 0; i < last; i++) {
for (var j = 0; j < arguments[i].length; j++) {
if (seen[arguments[i][j]]) {
seen[arguments[i][j]] += 1;
}
else if (!i) {
seen[arguments[i][j]] = 1;
}
}
}
for (var i = 0; i < arguments[last].length; i++) {
if ( seen[arguments[last][i]] === last)
result.push(arguments[last][i]);
}
return result;
}

If your arrays are sorted, this should run in O(n), where n is min( a.length, b.length )
function intersect_1d( a, b ){
var out=[], ai=0, bi=0, acurr, bcurr, last=Number.MIN_SAFE_INTEGER;
while( ( acurr=a[ai] )!==undefined && ( bcurr=b[bi] )!==undefined ){
if( acurr < bcurr){
if( last===acurr ){
out.push( acurr );
}
last=acurr;
ai++;
}
else if( acurr > bcurr){
if( last===bcurr ){
out.push( bcurr );
}
last=bcurr;
bi++;
}
else {
out.push( acurr );
last=acurr;
ai++;
bi++;
}
}
return out;
}

write a function finding maximum/minimum of array in javascript

[WITHOUT USING MIN/MATH Function]
The question ask me to create the function including 2 parameters.first is an array and the second parameter is either the String “Minimum” or “Maximum” . It confusing me when i don't know how to input the parameter as the string in the function. So that i decide to create 2 similar function as extremeValue(vector, maximum) and extremeValue(vector, minimum) ( I still don't know whether i can do that or not ).
And this is my code for extremeValue(vector, maximum).
So the way i did is create the array which have the same value with vector[i] than i using if statement to see if it bigger than that vector or not. However, The code is doesn't work. :(
var vector = [3, 1, 1]
var maximum
//------------this function give us the vector with all same value---------------//
function set(value, len) {
var arr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < len; i++) {
arr.push(value);
}
return arr;
}
//---------------------------------------------------//
//---------------------------------------------------//
function extremeValue(vector, maximum) {
var answer = "";
for (var count = 1; count++; count < vector.length) {
if (set(vector[count], vector.length) > vector)
answer += vector[count] + "is maximum"
}
return answer
}
//---------------------------------------------------//
console.log(extremeValue(vector, maximum))

Without using Math or any other javascript function, you can find the max and min values of an array as below.
var arr = [2, 3, 5, 10, 2, -9, 3];
alert("Max value is " + arrayMaxMin(arr, "Max"));
alert("Min value is " + arrayMaxMin(arr, "Min"));
function arrayMaxMin(array, selector) {
var val = array[0]; // variable to hold the current max/min value.
for (var i = 1; i < array.length; i++) {
if (selector == "Min") {
if (array[i] < val) {
val = array[i];
}
} else if (selector == "Max") {
if (array[i] > val) {
val = array[i];
}
}
}
return val;
}

You can use Math functions. Math.min will return you the smallest number of the passed numbers. You cannot call these functions directly on array so, you can use apply to call these functions and pass the array as parameters to the functions.
The Math.min() function returns the smallest of zero or more numbers.
Math.max as follow:
// array: The source array
// type: 'max' or 'min' to find Maximum or Minimum number
var getNum = function(array, type) {
return Math[type].apply(null, array);
};
var arr = [1, 3, 35, 12];
document.write('Max: ' + getNum(arr, 'max'));
document.write('<br />Min: ' + getNum(arr, 'min'));
UPDATE
they does not allow us use min max function
You can use array methods to get maximum and minimum value. Sort the array in ascending order and then the first element in array will be minimum and last element is maximum.
// array: Source array
// type: 'max' or 'min'
var getNum = function(array, type) {
// Sort the array by ascending order
array.sort(function(a, b) {
return a < b;
});
return type === 'max' ? array[0] : array[array.length - 1];
};
var vector = [233, 10, 32543, 54321];
var max = getNum(vector, 'max');
var min = getNum(vector, 'min');
document.write('Max: ' + max);
document.write('<br />Min: ' + min);

This should work too!. Hope it helps bro.
var arr = [2 ,4 ,56, 23, 10];
var max = arr.reduce(function(x,y){
return (x > y) ? x : y;
});
var min = arr.reduce(function(x,y){
return (x < y) ? x : y;
});
console.log('Max: '+ max);
console.log('Min: '+ min);

You could do something like this:
function extremeValue(my_arr, min_max) {
var retval, i, len;
for(i=0,len=my_arr.length; i < len; i++) {
if (min_max == 'minimum') {
retval = (my_arr[i] < retval ? my_arr[i] : retval);
} else {
retval = (my_arr[i] > retval ? my_arr[i] : retval);
}
}
return retval;
}
Then you would call it like this:
console.log(extremeValue(vector, 'maximum'));
console.log(extremeValue(vector, 'minimum'));

Without the Built in Math Min/Max method:
let minMaxValues = (arr) => {
let maxValues;
let minValues;
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
// check first value with all iterater
if(arr[i] < arr[1]){
minValues = arr[i];
}
// check last value with all iterater
if(arr[i] > arr[arr.length-1]){
maxValues = arr[i];
}
}
console.log(minValues);
console.log(maxValues);
}
minMaxValues([100, 20, 30, 10, 50]);

array.contains(array) in JavaScript

Is there an easy way of knowing if and array contains all elements of another array?
Example:
var myarray = [1,2,3];
var searchinarray = [1,2,3,4,5];
searchinarray contains all elements of myarray, so this should return true.
Regards

Here is an implementation of that function:
function contains(a, s) {
for(var i = 0, l = s.length; i < l; i++) {
if(!~a.indexOf(s[i])) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
This shows that it does what you describe:
> var myarray = [1,2,3];
> var searchinarray = [1,2,3,4,5];
> contains(myarray, searchinarray)
false
> contains(myarray, [1,2])
true
> contains(myarray, [2,3])
true

A contains function should only visit members of the array to be contained that exist, e.g.
var myArray = [1,,2];
var searchInArray = [1,2,3];
contains(myArray, searchInArray);
should return true, however a simple looping solution will return false as myArray[1] doesn't exist so will return undefined, which is not present in the searchInArray. To easily avoid that and not use a hasOwnProperty test, you can use the Array every method:
function contains(searchIn, array) {
return array.every(function(v){return this.indexOf(v) != -1}, searchIn);
}
so that:
var a = [1,,3];
var s = [1,2,3,4,5];
console.log(contains(s, a)); // true
You can add a contains method to all instances of Array if you wish:
if (typeof Array.prototype.contains == 'undefined') {
Array.prototype.contains = function(a) {
return a.every(function(v, i) {
return this.indexOf(v) != -1;
}, this);
}
}
console.log(s.contains(a)); // true
console.log(s.contains([1,9])); // false
You may need a polyfill for browsers that don't have .every (IE 8?).

function compare(array, contains_array) {
for(var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
if(contains_array.indexOf(array[i]) == -1) return false;
}
return true;
}
compare(myarray, searchinarray);

Trying to return up a recursive combinations function without getting 'undefined'

When I call this with [1,2,3,4], it returns undefined and I'm not understanding why. The goal is for it to return true if any combination of numbers in the array add up to the maximum number in the array, and false if it's not possible.
function ArrayAdditionI(arr) {
var max = Math.max.apply(null, arr);
arr.splice(arr.indexOf(max), 1);
var sum = function(arr) { return arr.reduce(function(a,b) { return a + b; }); };
function combos(arr) {
var f = function(prefix, arr) {
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
var clone = prefix.slice(0);
clone.push(arr[i]);
if (sum(clone) == max) { return true; }
return f(clone, arr.slice(i+1));
}
}
return f([], arr);
}
return combos(arr);
}

f is returning undefined when it is called with an empty arr! You will need to explicitly return false if none of the tests in the loop returned from the function. And you must not return false on the first occasion of the loop, but break only when you found true and continue the loop elsewhile.
To fix this, you'd have something like
function combos(arr) {
function f(prefix, arr) {
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
var clone = prefix.slice(0);
clone.push(arr[i]);
if (sum(clone) == max) return true;
if (f(clone, arr.slice(i+1))) return true;
}
return false;
}
return f([], arr);
}
However, also your recursion scheme with the loop looks a bit complicated. I would rather go with the naive enumeration of the "binary tree", where the nodes of each level decide whether the current item will be included in the to-be-tested subset:
function ArrayAdditionI(arr) {
var max = Math.max.apply(null, arr);
arr.splice(arr.indexOf(max), 1);
var sum = function(arr) { return arr.reduce(function(a,b) { return a + b; }, 0); };
function f(subset, arr) {
return arr.length
? f(subset, arr.slice(1)) || f(subset.concat([arr[0]]), arr.slice(1))
: sum(subset) == max
}
return f([], arr);
}

It seems that you don't test all the possible combination.
Here you will test 1+2+3, 2+3, 3 but never 1+3.
Do you really want to have a recursive function here ?
There may be some more simple way to find that.
function ArrayAdditionI(arr) {
var max = Math.max.apply(null, arr);
arr.splice(arr.indexOf(max), 1);
var res = arr.filter(function(num, idx) {
var combination = false;
// Check all combination non previously tested
for (var i = idx; i < arr.length - 1; i++) {
if (num + arr[i+1] === max) {
combination = true;
break;
}
}
return combination;
});
return res.length > 0;
}

The problem is your f function is not ever hitting the
if (sum(clone) == max) { return true; }
line of code so it will just keep recursively calling until arr.length == 0 and it will return undefined.
Your variables torf and results are unused, maybe you forgot to do something with them?