Related
I have two arrays containing objects. One contains keys in some order and another has data and I need to sort the data array in order against the given sorted key array. How can I do this?
var a = ['d','a','b','c'] ;
var b = [{a:1},{c:3},{d:4},{b:2}];
The result should be:
result = [{d:4},{a:1},{b:2},{c:3]
Try this
var a = ['d','a','b','c'] ;
var b = [{a:1},{c:3},{d:4},{b:2}];
b.sort(function(x,y){
var xkey = a.indexOf(Object.keys(x)[0]);
var ykey = a.indexOf(Object.keys(y)[0]);
return xkey - ykey;
})
document.body.innerHTML += JSON.stringify(b,0,4);
A different approach from above ones would be, using Lodash Javascript Library.
var a = ['d','a','b','c'] ;
var b = [{a:1},{c:3},{d:4},{b:2}];
var results = _.map(a,function(av) {
var obj = {};
obj[av] = _.find(b, av)[av];
return obj
});
document.body.innerHTML += JSON.stringify(results);
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/lodash/4.11.1/lodash.min.js"></script>
This approach respects the keys in the objects of the array for sorting.
Only the items of a are used for lookup and their respective order.
In this case d gets all sort value of the item of b, so d looks like
[ 1, 3, 0, 2 ]
While sorting with indices, we need e, which has simply the indices of b
[ 0, 1, 2, 3 ]
after sorting it became
[ 2, 0, 3, 1 ]
the wanted sort order. Now the original array is remapped to the new order.
But why?
Usually objects contains more than one property. If you use Object.keys and take just the first element, then you could go wrong, because this element is not the wanted element for getting the sort order.
To make it save, you need a different approach, which does not use Array#indexOf in combination with a fixed item of Object.keys.
var a = ['d', 'a', 'b', 'c'],
b = [{ a: 1 }, { c: 3 }, { d: 4 }, { b: 2 }],
d = b.map(function (bb) {
var k = -1;
a.some(function (aa, i) {
if (aa in bb) {
k = i;
return true;
}
});
return k;
}),
e = b.map(function (_, i) { return i; });
e.sort(function (a, b) {
return d[a] - d[b];
});
b = e.map(function (a) {
return b[a];
});
document.write('<pre> ' + JSON.stringify(b, 0, 4) + '</pre>');
This should do the trick
result = a.map(function(key) {
for(var i=0; i<b.length; ++i) {
if(key in b[i]) return b[i];
}
});
Brute force approach is to loop through each of a array and check the b array for it's presence.
var a = ['d','a','b','c'] ;
var b = [{a:1},{c:3},{d:4},{b:2}];
var ans = [];
for(var i = 0; i < a.length; ++i)
{
for(var j = 0; j < b.length; ++j)
{
if(b[j][a[i]])
ans.push(b[j]);
}
}
document.write(JSON.stringify(ans, 0, 4));
I have two arrays, a and b, e.g.
var a = [1,2,3,4];
var b = [2,4];
I want to get the indexes of the elements of a that are contained in b. I could use a loop, like
var ii = [];
for (var i=0; i < x.length; i++)
{
if (y.indexOf(x[i]) >= 0)
ii.push(i);
};
This works. But coming from the R language where this would simply be which(a %in% b), I suppose there will be more concise ways to get what I want in JS. Suggestions?
TIA :)
You can make it shorter by using Array.map
var idx = b.map(function(n){ return a.indexOf(n) }).filter(function(n){
return n != -1
})
A solution using the Array.reduce method
var a = [1,2,3,4];
var b = [2,4];
var idxs = b.reduce(function(l, r, idx) {
var i = a.indexOf(r);
return i > -1 ? (l.push(i), l) : l;
}, []);
console.log(idxs);
Lodash also offers tools that could make this easy. If you fancy using external libraries:
var a = [1,2,3,4];
var b = [2,4];
var intersection = _.intersection(a,b);
_.forEach(intersection, function(item){
console.log(a.indexOf(item));
});
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/2.4.1/lodash.js"></script>
But a pure vanilla solution could looks like:
var a = [1,2,3,4];
var b = [2,4];
function intersection(a, b)
{
var ai=0, bi=0;
var result = new Array();
while( ai < a.length && bi < b.length )
{
if (a[ai] < b[bi] ){ ai++; }
else if (a[ai] > b[bi] ){ bi++; }
else /* they're equal */
{
result.push(a[ai]);
ai++;
bi++;
}
}
return result;
}
var intersect = intersection(a,b);
intersect.forEach(function(item){
console.log(a.indexOf(item));
});
There will always be some form of loop, either written outright or implied with a call to Array.map() or the like. There's not much of a way around that.
You shouldn't have to write that code, though. Libraries like Lodash and Underscore have a method called intersection() which does the bulk of this -- potentially with more than two arrays:
_.intersection([1, 2, 3], [5, 2, 1, 4], [2, 1]);
// → [1, 2]
For the specific case of getting the indexes from a, you can chain the output of intersection() into map():
var a = [1,2,3,4];
var b = [2,4];
var result = _.intersection(a, b).map(function (v) {
return a.indexOf(v);
});
console.log(result);
// → [1, 3]
This works by mapping array a to return its index or an empty string-
filtering the map for Numbers returns only the indexes.
But your original script is more efficient, which is worth a few bytes download.
var a = [1,2,3,4];
var b = [2,4];
var a_in_b=a.map(function(itm,i){ return b.indexOf(itm)!=-1? i:''}).filter(Number);
/* a_in_b value: (Array) [1,3]; */
This question already has answers here:
Get all unique values in a JavaScript array (remove duplicates)
(91 answers)
Closed 1 year ago.
How can I get a list of unique values in an array? Do I always have to use a second array or is there something similar to java's hashmap in JavaScript?
I am going to be using JavaScript and jQuery only. No additional libraries can be used.
Here's a much cleaner solution for ES6 that I see isn't included here. It uses the Set and the spread operator: ...
var a = [1, 1, 2];
[... new Set(a)]
Which returns [1, 2]
Or for those looking for a one-liner (simple and functional) compatible with current browsers:
let a = ["1", "1", "2", "3", "3", "1"];
let unique = a.filter((item, i, ar) => ar.indexOf(item) === i);
console.log(unique);
Update 2021
I would recommend checking out Charles Clayton's answer, as of recent changes to JS there are even more concise ways to do this.
Update 18-04-2017
It appears as though 'Array.prototype.includes' now has widespread support in the latest versions of the mainline browsers (compatibility)
Update 29-07-2015:
There are plans in the works for browsers to support a standardized 'Array.prototype.includes' method, which although does not directly answer this question; is often related.
Usage:
["1", "1", "2", "3", "3", "1"].includes("2"); // true
Pollyfill (browser support, source from mozilla):
// https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#sec-array.prototype.includes
if (!Array.prototype.includes) {
Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, 'includes', {
value: function(searchElement, fromIndex) {
// 1. Let O be ? ToObject(this value).
if (this == null) {
throw new TypeError('"this" is null or not defined');
}
var o = Object(this);
// 2. Let len be ? ToLength(? Get(O, "length")).
var len = o.length >>> 0;
// 3. If len is 0, return false.
if (len === 0) {
return false;
}
// 4. Let n be ? ToInteger(fromIndex).
// (If fromIndex is undefined, this step produces the value 0.)
var n = fromIndex | 0;
// 5. If n ≥ 0, then
// a. Let k be n.
// 6. Else n < 0,
// a. Let k be len + n.
// b. If k < 0, let k be 0.
var k = Math.max(n >= 0 ? n : len - Math.abs(n), 0);
// 7. Repeat, while k < len
while (k < len) {
// a. Let elementK be the result of ? Get(O, ! ToString(k)).
// b. If SameValueZero(searchElement, elementK) is true, return true.
// c. Increase k by 1.
// NOTE: === provides the correct "SameValueZero" comparison needed here.
if (o[k] === searchElement) {
return true;
}
k++;
}
// 8. Return false
return false;
}
});
}
Since I went on about it in the comments for #Rocket's answer, I may as well provide an example that uses no libraries. This requires two new prototype functions, contains and unique
Array.prototype.contains = function(v) {
for (var i = 0; i < this.length; i++) {
if (this[i] === v) return true;
}
return false;
};
Array.prototype.unique = function() {
var arr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < this.length; i++) {
if (!arr.contains(this[i])) {
arr.push(this[i]);
}
}
return arr;
}
var duplicates = [1, 3, 4, 2, 1, 2, 3, 8];
var uniques = duplicates.unique(); // result = [1,3,4,2,8]
console.log(uniques);
For more reliability, you can replace contains with MDN's indexOf shim and check if each element's indexOf is equal to -1: documentation
One Liner, Pure JavaScript
With ES6 syntax
list = list.filter((x, i, a) => a.indexOf(x) === i)
x --> item in array
i --> index of item
a --> array reference, (in this case "list")
With ES5 syntax
list = list.filter(function (x, i, a) {
return a.indexOf(x) === i;
});
Browser Compatibility: IE9+
Using EcmaScript 2016 you can simply do it like this.
var arr = ["a", "a", "b"];
var uniqueArray = Array.from(new Set(arr)); // Unique Array ['a', 'b'];
Sets are always unique, and using Array.from() you can convert a Set to an array. For reference have a look at the documentations.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/from
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Set
These days, you can use ES6's Set data type to convert your array to a unique Set. Then, if you need to use array methods, you can turn it back into an Array:
var arr = ["a", "a", "b"];
var uniqueSet = new Set(arr); // {"a", "b"}
var uniqueArr = Array.from(uniqueSet); // ["a", "b"]
//Then continue to use array methods:
uniqueArr.join(", "); // "a, b"
If you want to leave the original array intact,
you need a second array to contain the uniqe elements of the first-
Most browsers have Array.prototype.filter:
const unique = array1.filter((item, index, array) => array.indexOf(item) === index);
//if you need a 'shim':
Array.prototype.filter= Array.prototype.filter || function(fun, scope){
var T= this, A= [], i= 0, itm, L= T.length;
if(typeof fun== 'function'){
while(i<L){
if(i in T){
itm= T[i];
if(fun.call(scope, itm, i, T)) A[A.length]= itm;
}
++i;
}
}
return A;
}
Array.prototype.indexOf= Array.prototype.indexOf || function(what, i){
if(!i || typeof i!= 'number') i= 0;
var L= this.length;
while(i<L){
if(this[i]=== what) return i;
++i;
}
return -1;
}
Fast, compact, no nested loops, works with any object not just strings and numbers, takes a predicate, and only 5 lines of code!!
function findUnique(arr, predicate) {
var found = {};
arr.forEach(d => {
found[predicate(d)] = d;
});
return Object.keys(found).map(key => found[key]);
}
Example: To find unique items by type:
var things = [
{ name: 'charm', type: 'quark'},
{ name: 'strange', type: 'quark'},
{ name: 'proton', type: 'boson'},
];
var result = findUnique(things, d => d.type);
// [
// { name: 'charm', type: 'quark'},
// { name: 'proton', type: 'boson'}
// ]
If you want it to find the first unique item instead of the last add a found.hasOwnPropery() check in there.
Not native in Javascript, but plenty of libraries have this method.
Underscore.js's _.uniq(array) (link) works quite well (source).
If you don't need to worry so much about older browsers, this is exactly what Sets are designed for.
The Set object lets you store unique values of any type, whether
primitive values or object references.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Set
const set1 = new Set([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1]);
// returns Set(5) {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}
Using jQuery, here's an Array unique function I made:
Array.prototype.unique = function () {
var arr = this;
return $.grep(arr, function (v, i) {
return $.inArray(v, arr) === i;
});
}
console.log([1,2,3,1,2,3].unique()); // [1,2,3]
Short and sweet solution using second array;
var axes2=[1,4,5,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,1,3,4];
var distinct_axes2=[];
for(var i=0;i<axes2.length;i++)
{
var str=axes2[i];
if(distinct_axes2.indexOf(str)==-1)
{
distinct_axes2.push(str);
}
}
console.log("distinct_axes2 : "+distinct_axes2); // distinct_axes2 : 1,4,5,2,3
Majority of the solutions above have a high run time complexity.
Here is the solution that uses reduce and can do the job in O(n) time.
Array.prototype.unique = Array.prototype.unique || function() {
var arr = [];
this.reduce(function (hash, num) {
if(typeof hash[num] === 'undefined') {
hash[num] = 1;
arr.push(num);
}
return hash;
}, {});
return arr;
}
var myArr = [3,1,2,3,3,3];
console.log(myArr.unique()); //[3,1,2];
Note:
This solution is not dependent on reduce. The idea is to create an object map and push unique ones into the array.
You only need vanilla JS to find uniques with Array.some and Array.reduce. With ES2015 syntax it's only 62 characters.
a.reduce((c, v) => b.some(w => w === v) ? c : c.concat(v)), b)
Array.some and Array.reduce are supported in IE9+ and other browsers. Just change the fat arrow functions for regular functions to support in browsers that don't support ES2015 syntax.
var a = [1,2,3];
var b = [4,5,6];
// .reduce can return a subset or superset
var uniques = a.reduce(function(c, v){
// .some stops on the first time the function returns true
return (b.some(function(w){ return w === v; }) ?
// if there's a match, return the array "c"
c :
// if there's no match, then add to the end and return the entire array
c.concat(v)}),
// the second param in .reduce is the starting variable. This is will be "c" the first time it runs.
b);
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/some
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/Reduce
Another thought of this question. Here is what I did to achieve this with fewer code.
var distinctMap = {};
var testArray = ['John', 'John', 'Jason', 'Jason'];
for (var i = 0; i < testArray.length; i++) {
var value = testArray[i];
distinctMap[value] = '';
};
var unique_values = Object.keys(distinctMap);
console.log(unique_values);
Array.prototype.unique = function () {
var dictionary = {};
var uniqueValues = [];
for (var i = 0; i < this.length; i++) {
if (dictionary[this[i]] == undefined){
dictionary[this[i]] = i;
uniqueValues.push(this[i]);
}
}
return uniqueValues;
}
I have tried this problem in pure JS.
I have followed following steps 1. Sort the given array, 2. loop through the sorted array, 3. Verify previous value and next value with current value
// JS
var inpArr = [1, 5, 5, 4, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2,2, 100, 100, -1];
//sort the given array
inpArr.sort(function(a, b){
return a-b;
});
var finalArr = [];
//loop through the inpArr
for(var i=0; i<inpArr.length; i++){
//check previous and next value
if(inpArr[i-1]!=inpArr[i] && inpArr[i] != inpArr[i+1]){
finalArr.push(inpArr[i]);
}
}
console.log(finalArr);
Demo
You can enter array with duplicates and below method will return array with unique elements.
function getUniqueArray(array){
var uniqueArray = [];
if (array.length > 0) {
uniqueArray[0] = array[0];
}
for(var i = 0; i < array.length; i++){
var isExist = false;
for(var j = 0; j < uniqueArray.length; j++){
if(array[i] == uniqueArray[j]){
isExist = true;
break;
}
else{
isExist = false;
}
}
if(isExist == false){
uniqueArray[uniqueArray.length] = array[i];
}
}
return uniqueArray;
}
Here is an approach with customizable equals function which can be used for primitives as well as for custom objects:
Array.prototype.pushUnique = function(element, equalsPredicate = (l, r) => l == r) {
let res = !this.find(item => equalsPredicate(item, element))
if(res){
this.push(element)
}
return res
}
usage:
//with custom equals for objects
myArrayWithObjects.pushUnique(myObject, (left, right) => left.id == right.id)
//with default equals for primitives
myArrayWithPrimitives.pushUnique(somePrimitive)
I was just thinking if we can use linear search to eliminate the duplicates:
JavaScript:
function getUniqueRadios() {
var x=document.getElementById("QnA");
var ansArray = new Array();
var prev;
for (var i=0;i<x.length;i++)
{
// Check for unique radio button group
if (x.elements[i].type == "radio")
{
// For the first element prev will be null, hence push it into array and set the prev var.
if (prev == null)
{
prev = x.elements[i].name;
ansArray.push(x.elements[i].name);
} else {
// We will only push the next radio element if its not identical to previous.
if (prev != x.elements[i].name)
{
prev = x.elements[i].name;
ansArray.push(x.elements[i].name);
}
}
}
}
alert(ansArray);
}
HTML:
<body>
<form name="QnA" action="" method='post' ">
<input type="radio" name="g1" value="ANSTYPE1"> good </input>
<input type="radio" name="g1" value="ANSTYPE2"> avg </input>
<input type="radio" name="g2" value="ANSTYPE3"> Type1 </input>
<input type="radio" name="g2" value="ANSTYPE2"> Type2 </input>
<input type="submit" value='SUBMIT' onClick="javascript:getUniqueRadios()"></input>
</form>
</body>
status_name=Array("a","b","c","b","e","f");
status_id=Array( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6);
How to combine these two arrays and to built multi dimensional array Expected Multidimensional array be like this
[["a", 1],["b", 2],["c", 3],["d", 4],["e", 5],["f", 6]]
Help me how to use above two array values and built my expected multidimensional array
Since you're including jQuery, you can use jQuery.map in a similar fashion to Linus' answer:
var result = [],
status_name = ["a","b","c","b","e","f"],
status_id = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6];
result = $.map(status_name, function (el, idx) {
return [[el, status_id[idx]]];
});
Looking at your variable names, I'd guess that your coming from a language (like PHP). If that's the case, make sure you remember to declare local variables with the var keyword, otherwise you'll be polluting the global scope and you'll run into some hideous bugs in IE.
JavaScript has no buitin method for this, but you can easily write it yourself:
function zip(arrayA, arrayB) {
var length = Math.min(arrayA.length, arrayB.length);
var result = [];
for (var n = 0; n < length; n++) {
result.push([arrayA[n], arrayB[n]]);
}
return result;
}
The name zip is chosen because a function that does something like this is often called zip in other languages.
I tried Myself and brought this solution, It might help some one
status_name=Array("a","b","c","b","e","f");
status_id=Array( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6);
Script:
Values=[];
for (i = 0; i < status_name.length; ++i)
{
Values[i] =Array(status_name[i], status_id[i]);
}
Using jQuery.map
var status_name = ["a","b","c","b","e","f"],
status_id = [1,2,3,4,5,6],
r = [];
r = $.map(status_name, function(n, i) {
return [[n, status_id[i]]];
});
Note the difference between return [[n, status_id[i]]] and return [n, status_id[i]]. Using the former will result in a 2d array while using the latter will result in a 1d array.
var combined = [], length = Math.min(status_name.length, status_id.length);
for(var i = 0; i < length; i++) {
combined.push([status_name[i], status_id[i]]);
}
You could also use Array.prototype.map, but that's not supported in all browsers:
var combined = status_name.map(function(name, index) { return [name, status_id[index]] });
try
function array_combine (keys, values) {
// Creates an array by using the elements of the first parameter as keys and the elements of the second as the corresponding values
//
// version: 1102.614
// discuss at: http://phpjs.org/functions/array_combine
// + original by: Kevin van Zonneveld (http://kevin.vanzonneveld.net)
// + improved by: Brett Zamir (http://brett-zamir.me)
// * example 1: array_combine([0,1,2], ['kevin','van','zonneveld']);
// * returns 1: {0: 'kevin', 1: 'van', 2: 'zonneveld'}
var new_array = {},
keycount = keys && keys.length,
i = 0;
// input sanitation
if (typeof keys !== 'object' || typeof values !== 'object' || // Only accept arrays or array-like objects
typeof keycount !== 'number' || typeof values.length !== 'number' || !keycount) { // Require arrays to have a count
return false;
}
// number of elements does not match
if (keycount != values.length) {
return false;
}
for (i = 0; i < keycount; i++) {
new_array[keys[i]] = values[i];
}
return new_array;
Reference
- arr combine
- array combine
This question already has answers here:
How to merge two arrays in JavaScript and de-duplicate items
(89 answers)
Closed 4 years ago.
Say I have an array of [34, 35, 45, 48, 49] and another array of [48, 55]. How can I get a resulting array of [34, 35, 45, 48, 49, 55]?
With the arrival of ES6 with sets and splat operator (at the time of being works only in Firefox, check compatibility table), you can write the following cryptic one liner:
var a = [34, 35, 45, 48, 49];
var b = [48, 55];
var union = [...new Set([...a, ...b])];
console.log(union);
Little explanation about this line: [...a, ...b] concatenates two arrays, you can use a.concat(b) as well. new Set() create a set out of it and thus your union. And the last [...x] converts it back to an array.
If you don't need to keep the order, and consider 45 and "45" to be the same:
function union_arrays (x, y) {
var obj = {};
for (var i = x.length-1; i >= 0; -- i)
obj[x[i]] = x[i];
for (var i = y.length-1; i >= 0; -- i)
obj[y[i]] = y[i];
var res = []
for (var k in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(k)) // <-- optional
res.push(obj[k]);
}
return res;
}
console.log(union_arrays([34,35,45,48,49], [44,55]));
If you use the library underscore you can write like this
var unionArr = _.union([34,35,45,48,49], [48,55]);
console.log(unionArr);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.9.1/underscore-min.js"></script>
Ref: http://underscorejs.org/#union
I'm probably wasting time on a dead thread here. I just had to implement this and went looking to see if I was wasting my time.
I really like KennyTM's answer. That's just how I would attack the problem. Merge the keys into a hash to naturally eliminate duplicates and then extract the keys. If you actually have jQuery you can leverage its goodies to make this a 2 line problem and then roll it into an extension. The each() in jQuery will take care of not iterating over items where hasOwnProperty() is false.
jQuery.fn.extend({
union: function(array1, array2) {
var hash = {}, union = [];
$.each($.merge($.merge([], array1), array2), function (index, value) { hash[value] = value; });
$.each(hash, function (key, value) { union.push(key); } );
return union;
}
});
Note that both of the original arrays are left intact. Then you call it like this:
var union = $.union(array1, array2);
If you wants to concatenate two arrays without any duplicate value,Just try this
var a=[34, 35, 45, 48, 49];
var b=[48, 55];
var c=a.concat(b).sort();
var res=c.filter((value,pos) => {return c.indexOf(value) == pos;} );
function unique(arrayName)
{
var newArray=new Array();
label: for(var i=0; i<arrayName.length;i++ )
{
for(var j=0; j<newArray.length;j++ )
{
if(newArray[j]==arrayName[i])
continue label;
}
newArray[newArray.length] = arrayName[i];
}
return newArray;
}
var arr1 = new Array(0,2,4,4,4,4,4,5,5,6,6,6,7,7,8,9,5,1,2,3,0);
var arr2= new Array(3,5,8,1,2,32,1,2,1,2,4,7,8,9,1,2,1,2,3,4,5);
var union = unique(arr1.concat(arr2));
console.log(union);
Adapted from: https://stackoverflow.com/a/4026828/1830259
Array.prototype.union = function(a)
{
var r = this.slice(0);
a.forEach(function(i) { if (r.indexOf(i) < 0) r.push(i); });
return r;
};
Array.prototype.diff = function(a)
{
return this.filter(function(i) {return a.indexOf(i) < 0;});
};
var s1 = [1, 2, 3, 4];
var s2 = [3, 4, 5, 6];
console.log("s1: " + s1);
console.log("s2: " + s2);
console.log("s1.union(s2): " + s1.union(s2));
console.log("s2.union(s1): " + s2.union(s1));
console.log("s1.diff(s2): " + s1.diff(s2));
console.log("s2.diff(s1): " + s2.diff(s1));
// Output:
// s1: 1,2,3,4
// s2: 3,4,5,6
// s1.union(s2): 1,2,3,4,5,6
// s2.union(s1): 3,4,5,6,1,2
// s1.diff(s2): 1,2
// s2.diff(s1): 5,6
I like Peter Ajtai's concat-then-unique solution, but the code's not very clear. Here's a nicer alternative:
function unique(x) {
return x.filter(function(elem, index) { return x.indexOf(elem) === index; });
};
function union(x, y) {
return unique(x.concat(y));
};
Since indexOf returns the index of the first occurence, we check this against the current element's index (the second parameter to the filter predicate).
Shorter version of kennytm's answer:
function unionArrays(a, b) {
const cache = {};
a.forEach(item => cache[item] = item);
b.forEach(item => cache[item] = item);
return Object.keys(cache).map(key => cache[key]);
};
You can use a jQuery plugin: jQuery Array Utilities
For example the code below
$.union([1, 2, 2, 3], [2, 3, 4, 5, 5])
will return [1,2,3,4,5]
function unite(arr1, arr2, arr3) {
newArr=arr1.concat(arr2).concat(arr3);
a=newArr.filter(function(value){
return !arr1.some(function(value2){
return value == value2;
});
});
console.log(arr1.concat(a));
}//This is for Sorted union following the order :)
function unionArrays() {
var args = arguments,
l = args.length,
obj = {},
res = [],
i, j, k;
while (l--) {
k = args[l];
i = k.length;
while (i--) {
j = k[i];
if (!obj[j]) {
obj[j] = 1;
res.push(j);
}
}
}
return res;
}
var unionArr = unionArrays([34, 35, 45, 48, 49], [44, 55]);
console.log(unionArr);
Somewhat similar in approach to alejandro's method, but a little shorter and should work with any number of arrays.
function unionArray(arrayA, arrayB) {
var obj = {},
i = arrayA.length,
j = arrayB.length,
newArray = [];
while (i--) {
if (!(arrayA[i] in obj)) {
obj[arrayA[i]] = true;
newArray.push(arrayA[i]);
}
}
while (j--) {
if (!(arrayB[j] in obj)) {
obj[arrayB[j]] = true;
newArray.push(arrayB[j]);
}
}
return newArray;
}
var unionArr = unionArray([34, 35, 45, 48, 49], [44, 55]);
console.log(unionArr);
Faster
http://jsperf.com/union-array-faster
I would first concatenate the arrays, then I would return only the unique value.
You have to create your own function to return unique values. Since it is a useful function, you might as well add it in as a functionality of the Array.
In your case with arrays array1 and array2 it would look like this:
array1.concat(array2) - concatenate the two arrays
array1.concat(array2).unique() - return only the unique values. Here unique() is a method you added to the prototype for Array.
The whole thing would look like this:
Array.prototype.unique = function () {
var r = new Array();
o: for(var i = 0, n = this.length; i < n; i++)
{
for(var x = 0, y = r.length; x < y; x++)
{
if(r[x]==this[i])
{
continue o;
}
}
r[r.length] = this[i];
}
return r;
}
var array1 = [34,35,45,48,49];
var array2 = [34,35,45,48,49,55];
// concatenate the arrays then return only the unique values
console.log(array1.concat(array2).unique());
Just wrote before for the same reason (works with any amount of arrays):
/**
* Returns with the union of the given arrays.
*
* #param Any amount of arrays to be united.
* #returns {array} The union array.
*/
function uniteArrays()
{
var union = [];
for (var argumentIndex = 0; argumentIndex < arguments.length; argumentIndex++)
{
eachArgument = arguments[argumentIndex];
if (typeof eachArgument !== 'array')
{
eachArray = eachArgument;
for (var index = 0; index < eachArray.length; index++)
{
eachValue = eachArray[index];
if (arrayHasValue(union, eachValue) == false)
union.push(eachValue);
}
}
}
return union;
}
function arrayHasValue(array, value)
{ return array.indexOf(value) != -1; }
Simple way to deal with merging single array values.
var values[0] = {"id":1235,"name":"value 1"}
values[1] = {"id":4323,"name":"value 2"}
var object=null;
var first=values[0];
for (var i in values)
if(i>0)
object= $.merge(values[i],first)
You can try these:
function union(a, b) {
return a.concat(b).reduce(function(prev, cur) {
if (prev.indexOf(cur) === -1) prev.push(cur);
return prev;
}, []);
}
or
function union(a, b) {
return a.concat(b.filter(function(el) {
return a.indexOf(el) === -1;
}));
}
ES2015 version
Array.prototype.diff = function(a) {return this.filter(i => a.indexOf(i) < 0)};
Array.prototype.union = function(a) {return [...this.diff(a), ...a]}
If you want a custom equals function to match your elements, you can use this function in ES2015:
function unionEquals(left, right, equals){
return left.concat(right).reduce( (acc,element) => {
return acc.some(elt => equals(elt, element))? acc : acc.concat(element)
}, []);
}
It traverses the left+right array. Then for each element, will fill the accumulator if it does not find that element in the accumulator. At the end, there are no duplicate as specified by the equals function.
Pretty, but probably not very efficient with thousands of objects.
I think it would be simplest to create a new array, adding the unique values only as determined by indexOf.
This seems to me to be the most straightforward solution, though I don't know if it is the most efficient. Collation is not preserved.
var a = [34, 35, 45, 48, 49],
b = [48, 55];
var c = union(a, b);
function union(a, b) { // will work for n >= 2 inputs
var newArray = [];
//cycle through input arrays
for (var i = 0, l = arguments.length; i < l; i++) {
//cycle through each input arrays elements
var array = arguments[i];
for (var ii = 0, ll = array.length; ii < ll; ii++) {
var val = array[ii];
//only add elements to the new array if they are unique
if (newArray.indexOf(val) < 0) newArray.push(val);
}
}
return newArray;
}
[i for( i of new Set(array1.concat(array2)))]
Let me break this into parts for you
// This is a list by comprehension
// Store each result in an element of the array
[i
// will be placed in the variable "i", for each element of...
for( i of
// ... the Set which is made of...
new Set(
// ...the concatenation of both arrays
array1.concat(array2)
)
)
]
In other words, it first concatenates both and then it removes the duplicates (a Set, by definition cannot have duplicates)
Do note, though, that the order of the elements is not guaranteed, in this case.