I am trying to re-create website with parallax effect using JavaScript. That means that I have two or more layers, that are moving different speeds while scrolling.
In my case I'm moving only one layer, the other one remains static:
layer 1 = website text;
layer 2 = element background;
for this I'm using simple source code (with jQuery 1.6.4):
var docwindow = $(window);
function newpos(pos, adjust, ratio){
return ((pos - adjust) * ratio) + "px";
}
function move(){
var pos = docwindow.scrollTop();
element.css({'top' : newpos(pos, 0, 0.5)});
}
$(window).scroll(function(){
move();
});
The Problem:
- All calculations are done right and the effect "works" as expected. But there is some performance glitch under some browsers (Chrome MAC/Windows, Opera MAC, IE, paradoxically not Safari).
What do I see during scrolling?
- While scrolling the background moves in one direction together with scroll, but it seems to occasionally jump few pixels back and then forth, which creates very disturbing effect (not fluid).
Solutions that I tried:
- adding a timer to limit scroll events
- using .animate() method with short duration instead of .css() method.
I've also observed, that the animation is smooth when using .scrollTo method (scrollTo jQuery plugin). So I suspect that there is something wrong with firing scroll events (too fast).
Have you observed the same behavior?
Do you know, how to fix it?
Can you post a better solution?
Thanks for all responses
EDIT #1:
Here you can find jsfiddle demonstration (with timer): http://jsfiddle.net/4h9Ye/1/
I think you should be using scrollTop() instead and change the background position to fixed. The problem is that setting it to absolute will make it move by default when you scroll up or down.
The flicker occurs because the position is updated as part of the default browser scroll and updated again as part of your script. This will render both positions instead of just the one you want. With fixed, the background will never move unless you tell it so.
I've created a demo for you at http://jsfiddle.net/4h9Ye/2/ .
Related
I’ve created an animation for my website to change a certain element (for example its background colour) while scrolling using Vanilla JS. For this I have used the window.onscroll property and I trigger the animation when window.scrollY reaches a specific position, my code is:
window.addEventListener('scroll', () => {
if (window.scrollX >= 1000) {
box.style = "background:red"
}
})
It looks great when I am editing on my big screen resolution, but if I look at the page on my laptop, the animation gets messed up because the innerWidth and innerHeight of the screen are different. I want to trigger the animation dynamically if it reaches a certain section of the page without having to worry about the scroll position.
Does anyone have any ideas about how I can fix this?
I think using getBoundingClientRect() solves your problem.
You basically do something like this:
var my_box = document.getElementById('my-box');
var rect = my_box.getBoundingClientRect();
The rect variable now contains an Object which includes a top and a left property with values that are relative to the viewport.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Element/getBoundingClientRect
This may come as a huge surprise to some people but I am having an issue with the IE browser when I am using the $(window).scroll method.
My goal:
I would like to have the menu located on the left retain it's position until the scroll reaches > y value. It will then fix itself to the top of the page until the scroll returns to a < y value.
My error:
Everything seems just fine in Chrome and Firefox but when I go to Internet Explorer it would seem the browser is moving #scroller every time the scroll value changes, this is causing a moving/flickering event.
If someone could point me to a resource or give me a workaround for this I would be very grateful!
Here is a fiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/CampbeII/nLK7j/
Here is a link to the site in dev:
http://squ4reone.com/domains/ottawakaraoke/Squ4reone/responsive/index.php
My script:
$(window).scroll(function () {
var navigation = $(window).scrollTop();
if (navigation > 400) {
$('#scroller').css('top',navigation - 220);
} else {
$('#scroller').css('top',183);
$('#scroller').css('position','relative');
}
});
You might want to take a look at the jQuery Waypoints plugin, it lets you do sticky elements like this and a lot more.
If you want to stick with your current method, like the other answers have indicated you should toggle fixed positioning instead of updating the .top attribute in every scroll event. However, I would also introduce a flag to track whether or not it is currently stuck, this way you are only updating the position and top attributes when it actually make the transition instead of every scroll event. Interacting with the DOM is computationally expensive, this will take a lot of load off of the layout engine and should make things even smoother.
http://jsfiddle.net/WYNcj/6/
$(function () {
var stuck = false,
stickAt = $('#scroller').offset().top;
$(window).scroll(function () {
var scrollTop = $(window).scrollTop();
if (!stuck && scrollTop > stickAt) {
$('#scroller').css('top', 0);
$('#scroller').css('position','fixed');
stuck = true;
} else if (stuck && scrollTop < stickAt) {
$('#scroller').css('top', stickAt);
$('#scroller').css('position','absolute');
stuck = false;
}
});
});
Update
Switching the #scroller from relative to fixed removes it from the normal flow of the page, this can have unintended consequences for the layout as it re-flows without the missing block. If you change #scroller to use an absolute position it will be removed from the normal flow and will no longer cause these side-effects. I've updated the above example and the linked jsfiddle to reflect the changes to the JS/CSS.
I also changed the way that stickAt is calculated as well, it uses .offset() to find the exact position of the top of #scoller instead of relying on the CSS top value.
Instead of setting the top distance at each scroll event, please consider only switching between a fixed position and an absolute or relative position.All browsers will appreciate and Especially IE.
So you still listen to scroll but you now keep a state flag out of the scroll handler and simply evaluate if it has to switch between display types.
That is so much more optimized and IE likes it.
I can get flickers in Chrome as well if I scroll very quickly. Instead of updating the top position on scroll, instead used the fixed position for your element once the page has scrolled below the threshold. Take a look at the updated fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/nLK7j/2/
Hello StackOverflow Community,
what I am trying to achieve is a header that can be moved with the mouse.
You klick into the header and drag the mouse and the elements inside the header will move with different speeds.
I achieved the parallaxing part but the performance is not really good. It is partially a bit laggy while dragging the backgrounds.
My question now is: what can be changed in the code to get a performance boost?
That's the part of the code that takes care of parallaxing. On every mousemove a each loop is executed which I think is the reason for the performance beeing so laggy:
var dragging = false;
var clickMouseX;
//Our object for the layers
//each layer has a different scrolling speed
var movingObjects = {
'#header-l1' : {'speed': 1},
'#header-l2' : {'speed': 1.4},
'#header-l3' : {'speed': 1.85},
'#header-l4' : {'speed': 2.2},
};
$('#header-wrapper').mousedown(function(e){
dragging = true;
//Get initial mouse position when clicked
clickMouseX = e.pageX;
$(this).mousemove(function(mme){
//execute only if mousedown
if(dragging){
//iterate through all layers which have to be parallaxed
$.each(movingObjects, function(el, opt){
var element = $(el);
//get difference of initial mouse position and current mouse position
var diff = clickMouseX - mme.pageX;
//scroll-position left speed 1
if(diff < 0) diff = -1;
//scroll position right speed 1
if(diff >= 0) diff = 1;
//get current position of layer
currLeft = parseInt(element.css('left'));
//get current layer width
elWidth = element.width();
//if right border is reached don't scroll further
if(currLeft < -(elWidth - 810)){
element.css('left', -(elWidth - 810));
}
//so do with left border
if(currLeft > 0){
element.css('left', 0);
}
//parallax it! Subtract the scroll position speed multiplied by the speed of the desired
//layer from the current left property
element.css('left', parseInt(element.css('left')) - diff*opt.speed);
});
}
});
/* Cursor */
$(this).css('cursor', 'pointer');
return false;
});
I also put a fiddle up:
http://jsfiddle.net/yWGDz/
Thanks in advance,
Thomas
P.S. maybe someone even finds out why layer two and three have the same scroll speed while having different speeds defined.
I worked at this a bit, and came up with this: http://jsfiddle.net/amqER/2/
This works a lot faster than the original (especially in firefox, where it performs a whole lot better, chrome it's still pretty slow). I also changed up some of the logic in your code, to make it make more sense.
A list of things that I did:
Minify your pngs
2 of your png files were over 2 megs, so I threw them into a png compressor (tinypng) and that reduced the size a lot. This helps with loading time and overall snappiness.
Re-use values as much as possible
In your original code, you wrote to and then subsequently read from the css left property a couple times in your code. Doing this is going to make it a lot slower. Instead, I kept an left property, and would only touch $.css when I absolutely needed to. Likewise for reading each element's width each update.
Also, like I said, I modified your logic to (I think) make more sense, given what you were trying to accomplish. It calculates a new diff each update, and tries to move according to that. Also, it doesn't try to keep moving once one of the images falls off (which yours does if you move all the way to the right, and it looks really weird). You can also look at this: http://jsfiddle.net/amqER/5/, which maybe is more like the control scheme you wanted.
Just some quick performance tips.
Try not to use $(this).mousemove instead save $(this) into a variable and use that.
var th = $(this);
th.mousemove...
Try to avoid using $.each. This is probably the part that's slowing your code down.
You can replace it with a for loop, but I would suggest, in this case, sending in each element one by one.
var parallax = function(img){
};
parallax(img1);
parallax(img2);
instantly-increase-your-jquery-performance
Whilst Xymostech's answer does greatly improve upon the original poster's original code; the performance is hardly improved for me in Chrome.
Whilst inspecting the page FPS, the solution posted here runs at 15FPS for me on a Retina MacBook Pro.
I made a very simple change to the code, altering it to use translate3d properties instead of left. Now, it runs at 55-60 FPS for me. I'd call that a massive performance boost.
If 'show paint rectangles' are turned on in Chrome, you'll see the previously posted solution is continually painting changes to the dom whilst the parallax is in motion. With the translate3d solution, there's simply zero painting done the whole time the parallax is in motion.
http://jsfiddle.net/LG47e/
I am looking for help / a point in the right direction / or a solution for a flicker/jump, when scrolling on a looping/infinite website, which can be seen in this fiddle.
What seems to be causing the jump is:
"$(window).scrollTop(half_way - child_height);", and what could also be a Chrome windows scrollTop bug, but it is happening in all browsers at the moment.
If I remove "- child_height" there is no longer a flicker but the page no longer scrolls correctly, which can be seen in this fiddle.
Also, on the very first scroll the right hand column jumps up by three boxes - also because of 'half_way', which I can fix by giving it a "bottom: -600px;"
The full code:
http://jsfiddle.net/djsbaker/j3d8r/1/
var num_children = $('#up-left').children().length;
var child_height = $('#up-left').height() / num_children;
var half_way = num_children * child_height / 2;
$(window).scrollTop(half_way);
function crisscross() {
$('#up-left').css('bottom', '-' + window.scrollY + 'px');
$('#down-right').css('bottom', '-' + window.scrollY + 'px');
var firstLeft = $('#up-left').children().first();
var lastLeft = $('#up-left').children().last();
var lastRight = $('#down-right').children().last();
var firstRight = $('#down-right').children().first();
if (window.scrollY > half_way ) {
$(window).scrollTop(half_way - child_height);
lastRight.appendTo('#up-left');
firstLeft.prependTo('#down-right');
} else if (window.scrollY < half_way - child_height) {
$(window).scrollTop(half_way);
lastLeft.appendTo('#down-right');
firstRight.prependTo('#up-left');
}
}
$(window).scroll(crisscross);
Okay - here is a 'working' version - and by works I mean it less flickery than before. I thought it was flicker free, and it was when I was on battery power, but plugged into the mains and the CPU is fast enough to get flicker.
As I mentioned, to get rid of the flicker you need to clone the objects, manipulate them and then replace them into the DOM, rather than just manipulating the DOM directly.
I did this by getting the contents of <div id="content"> manipulating them and then replacing them into that <div>.
Also, it's a good idea to only find things in the DOM once, and from then on use a reference to that object rather than searching repeatedly. e.g.
var leftSide = $(clone).find('.up-left');
....
lastRight.appendTo(leftSide);
....
$(leftSide).css('bottom', '-' + window.scrollY + 'px');
rather than:
lastRight.appendTo('#up-left');
$('#up-left').css('bottom', '-' + window.scrollY + 'px');
Searching the DOM is relatively slow, and so storing references can improve performance/reduce flicker.
Storing the object also makes the code easier to understand (imho) as you can easily see that you're referencing the same thing, rather than possibly different things.
I still get flickering in chrome on windows with Danack solution. For this site I would control all the scrolling (you already scroll manually one of the sides), and give elements absolute positions.
Or if you insist on using the browser scrolling, may be use animations: animate the height of the last elements till 0px then use appendTo, and then animato from 0px to the normal height...
This might be a long shot, but I had the same flickering when working with infinitescroll,
and ended up using imagesLoaded.I ended up appending the additional images (now loaded) with a fade in, and that prevented them from flickering because of the fact they were loaded.
So maybe by using the imagesloaded - or a callback on the images, you can solve the flickering. It does decrease the speed though. I can image that if you want to scroll through everything as fast as possible, this might not be the solution. Good luck!
A solution would be to not use the native scrolling functionality but to simulate scrolling. This would be done by setting the overflow of your content to "hidden" in addition with capturing the "mousewheel" event on it and triggering some action when it is called. I started to try this out here (using MooTools instead of jQuery since I'm more fimilar with it). It's currently just "working" on the left side by altering the margin-top of the first element.
My next steps would be:
Check if the negative margin-top of the first element is bigger than the height of it and move it to the right side if so.
Same logic for the last box on the right side with a negative margin-bottom.
This has some downsides, though. Simulating scrolling doesn't feel as natural as the native scrolling functionality and clicking the mousewheel doesn't work. These might be solveable but it would require some more coding to get it to work smoothly. Anyway, in the end you would have a solution without any flickering and with no sticky scrollbar at the side (An idea for a replacement could be a small area on the side that triggers the scrolling on mouseover).
Here's the breakdown...
wrapper (position:relative; overflow:hidden; )
section-container (position:absolute)
multiple child sections
I attach a mousewheel event listener and animate (with easing) the 'top' position of 'section-container'. As this position changes, the 'background-position' of each section moves vertically based on the position of 'section-container's 'top' property (continually updated through a setTimeout()).
All of that works as it should, except as the 'background-position' changes, the image has a bit of a jitter. This doesn't happen if the 'background-attachment' is set to 'fixed'... but I don't want that.
Can anyone explain this, with a possible fix? I continually refer to the https://victoriabeckham.landrover.com/ site and can't figure out what they're doing differently to get theirs operating so efficiently.
You can check this out, i believe its where they do most of the animating:
https://victoriabeckham.landrover.com/js/ScrollAnimator.js?v=471
I would have to say they have some kind of framework that they are using to accomplish this.
EDIT: Sorry didn't see the new answer above mine, seems like a good starting point.
-Ken
If you inspect this website carefully, you will able to use it like landrover site.
You need to use: scrollTo plugin and parallax plugin
And document jQuery should be like this:
$(document).ready(function(){
$('#nav').localScroll(800);
//.parallax(xPosition, speedFactor, outerHeight) options:
//xPosition - Horizontal position of the element
//inertia - speed to move relative to vertical scroll. Example: 0.1 is one tenth the speed of scrolling, 2 is twice the speed of scrolling
//outerHeight (true/false) - Whether or not jQuery should use it's outerHeight option to determine when a section is in the viewport
$('#intro').parallax("50%", 0.1);
$('#second').parallax("50%", 0.1);
$('.bg').parallax("50%", 0.4);
$('#third').parallax("50%", 0.3);
});
Ok. So I figured out my issue was when trying to animate() the 'section-container' on the 'top' property. I was using a "+=" to allow it to increment from its current position. Not a good idea when using 'mousewheel' events. I changed it to a hard-set variable that is continually incremented/decremented.