I'm trying to validate name which contains "alphanumeric characters, supported symbols, and space". Here I need to allow only a single hyphen(-), but not a double hyphen(--).
This is my code as follows:
$.validator.addMethod(
'alphanumeric_only',
function (val, elem) {
return this.optional(elem) || /^[^*~<^>+(\--)/;|.]+$/.test(val);
},
$.format("shouldn't contain *.^~<>/;|")
);
The above code, doesn't even allow a single hyphen(-). How do I allow a single hyphen, but prevent a double hyphen. Any help is greatly appreciated.
For this, you need a negative lookahead assertion:
/^(?!.*--)[^*~<^>+()\/;|.]+$/
should do it.
Explanation:
^ # Start of string
(?! # Assert it's impossible to match the following:
.* # any string, followed by
-- # two hyphens
) # End of lookahead
[^*~<^>+()\/;|.]+ # Match a string consisting only of characters other than these
$ # End of string
Not that this might fail if your string can contain newlines. If it can, use
/^(?![\s\S]*--)[^*~<^>+()\/;|.]+$/
I advise you to use white list instead of blacklist. However this is working:
<input type="text" id="validate"/>
<script>
$('#validate').keyup(function(){
val = this.value;
if(/([*.^~<>/;|]|--)/.test(val)) this.style.backgroundColor='red';
else this.style.backgroundColor='';
});
</script>
Related
I have a file and I require some Regex validation on that.
The validation is the file name must only contain ASCII 32-126 characters,
except:–34 ["] –39 [’] –59 [;] –60 [<] –61 [=] –62 [>] –92 [\]
Additionally, the file name cannot include the following sequence of characters: –%00
let filename = "filename"
let regex = ""
console.log(filename);
could someone take a look and let me know the solution?
Thanks
You can use the following Regex expression:
^(?:(?!["';<=>\\])[\x20-\x7E])+$
Regex Demo
Explanation:
^ # start of line
(?: # non-capturing group
(?!["';<=>\\]) # negative lookahead - do not to match if contains given symbols
[\x20-\x7E] # match in range from ASCII 32-126
) # close non-capturing group
+ # match 1-unlimited times
$ # end of line
I've got a text box where I wanted to ensure some goods and bads out of it.
For instance good could include:
GoodString
GoodString88
99GoodString
Some bad things I did not want to include was:
Good*String
Good&String
But one thing I wanted to allow would be to allow spaces between words so this should of been good:
Good String
However my regex/js is stating this is NOT a good string - I want to allow it. I'm using the test routine for this and I'm as dumb as you can get with regexes. I don't know why I can never understand these things...
In any event my validation is as follows:
var rx = /^[\w.-]+$/;
if (!rx.test($("#MainContent_txtNewDocumentTitle").val())) {
//code for bad string
}else{
//code for good string
}
What can I do to this:
var rx = /^[\w.-]+$/;
Such that spaces are allowed?
You can use this regex instead to allow space only in middle (not at start/end):
var rx = /^[\w.-]+(?:[ \t]+[\w.-]+)*$/gm;
RegEx Demo
RegEx Breakup:
^ # line start
[\w.-]+ # match 1 or more of a word character or DOT or hyphen
(?: # start a non-capturing group
[ \t]+ # match one or more space or tab
[\w.-]+ # match 1 or more of a word character or DOT or hyphen
)* # close the non-capturing group. * will allow 0 or more matches of group
$ # line end
/gm # g for global and m for multiline matches
RegEx Reference
I want to ensure that the user input doesn't contain characters like <, > or &#, whether it is text input or textarea. My pattern:
var pattern = /^((?!&#|<|>).)*$/m;
The problem is, that it still matches multiline strings from a textarea like
this text matches
though this should not, because of this character <
EDIT:
To be more clear, I need exclude &# combination only, not & or #.
Please suggest the solution. Very grateful.
You're probably not looking for m (multiline) switch but s (DOTALL) switch in Javascript. Unfortunately s doesn't exist in Javascript.
However good news that DOTALL can be simulated using [\s\S]. Try following regex:
/^(?![\s\S]*?(&#|<|>))[\s\S]*$/
OR:
/^((?!&#|<|>)[\s\S])*$/
Live Demo
I don't think you need a lookaround assertion in this case. Simply use a negated character class:
var pattern = /^[^<>&#]*$/m;
If you're also disallowing the following characters, -, [, ], make sure to escape them or put them in proper order:
var pattern = /^[^][<>&#-]*$/m;
Alternate answer to specific question:
anubhava's solution works accurately, but is slow because it must perform a negative lookahead at each and every character position in the string. A simpler approach is to use reverse logic. i.e. Instead of verifying that: /^((?!&#|<|>)[\s\S])*$/ does match, verify that /[<>]|&#/ does NOT match. To illustrate this, lets create a function: hasSpecial() which tests if a string has one of the special chars. Here are two versions, the first uses anubhava's second regex:
function hasSpecial_1(text) {
// If regex matches, then string does NOT contain special chars.
return /^((?!&#|<|>)[\s\S])*$/.test(text) ? false : true;
}
function hasSpecial_2(text) {
// If regex matches, then string contains (at least) one special char.
return /[<>]|&#/.test(text) ? true : false;
}
These two functions are functionally equivalent, but the second one is probably quite a bit faster.
Note that when I originally read this question, I misinterpreted it to really want to exclude HTML special chars (including HTML entities). If that were the case, then the following solution will do just that.
Test if a string contains HTML special Chars:
It appears that the OP want to ensure a string does not contain any special HTML characters including: <, >, as well as decimal and hex HTML entities such as: , , etc. If this is the case then the solution should probably also exclude the other (named) type of HTML entities such as: &, <, etc. The solution below excludes all three forms of HTML entities as well as the <> tag delimiters.
Here are two approaches: (Note that both approaches do allow the sequence: &# if it is not part of a valid HTML entity.)
FALSE test using positive regex:
function hasHtmlSpecial_1(text) {
/* Commented regex:
# Match string having no special HTML chars.
^ # Anchor to start of string.
[^<>&]* # Zero or more non-[<>&] (normal*).
(?: # Unroll the loop. ((special normal*)*)
& # Allow a & but only if
(?! # not an HTML entity (3 valid types).
(?: # One from 3 types of HTML entities.
[a-z\d]+ # either a named entity,
| \#\d+ # or a decimal entity,
| \#x[a-f\d]+ # or a hex entity.
) # End group of HTML entity types.
; # All entities end with ";".
) # End negative lookahead.
[^<>&]* # More (normal*).
)* # End unroll the loop.
$ # Anchor to end of string.
*/
var re = /^[^<>&]*(?:&(?!(?:[a-z\d]+|#\d+|#x[a-f\d]+);)[^<>&]*)*$/i;
// If regex matches, then string does NOT contain HTML special chars.
return re.test(text) ? false : true;
}
Note that the above regex utilizes Jeffrey Friedl's "Unrolling-the-Loop" efficiency technique and will run very quickly for both matching and non-matching cases. (See his regex masterpiece: Mastering Regular Expressions (3rd Edition))
TRUE test using negative regex:
function hasHtmlSpecial_2(text) {
/* Commented regex:
# Match string having one special HTML char.
[<>] # Either a tag delimiter
| & # or a & if start of
(?: # one of 3 types of HTML entities.
[a-z\d]+ # either a named entity,
| \#\d+ # or a decimal entity,
| \#x[a-f\d]+ # or a hex entity.
) # End group of HTML entity types.
; # All entities end with ";".
*/
var re = /[<>]|&(?:[a-z\d]+|#\d+|#x[a-f\d]+);/i;
// If regex matches, then string contains (at least) one special HTML char.
return re.test(text) ? true : false;
}
Note also that I have included a commented version of each of these (non-trivial) regexes in the form of a JavaScript comment.
In the example below the output is true. It cookie and it also matches cookie14214 I'm guessing it's because cookie is in the string cookie14214. How do I hone-in this match to only get cookie?
var patt1=new RegExp(/(biscuit|cookie)/i);
document.write(patt1.test("cookie14214"));
Is this the best solution?
var patt1=new RegExp(/(^biscuit$|^cookie$)/i);
The answer depends on your allowance of characters surrounding the word cookie. If the word is to appear strictly on a line by itself, then:
var patt1=new RegExp(/^(biscuit|cookie)$/i);
If you want to allow symbols (spaces, ., ,, etc), but not alphanumeric values, try something like:
var patt1=new RegExp(/(?:^|[^\w])(biscuit|cookie)(?:[^\w]|$)/i);
Second regex, explained:
(?: # non-matching group
^ # beginning-of-string
| [^\w] # OR, non-alphanumeric characters
)
(biscuit|cookie) # match desired text/words
(?: # non-matching group
[^\w] # non-alphanumeric characters
| $ # OR, end-of-string
)
Yes, or use word boundaries. Note that this will match great cookies but not greatcookies.
var patt1=new RegExp(/(\bbiscuit\b|\bcookie\b)/i);
If you want to match the exact string cookie, then you don't even need regular expressions, just use ==, since /^cookie$/i.test(s) is basically the same as s.toLowerCase() == "cookie".
I'm trying to exclude some internal IP addresses and some internal IP address formats from viewing certain logos and links in the site.I have multiple range of IP addresses(sample given below). Is it possible to write a regex that could match all the IP addresses in the list below using javascript?
10.X.X.X
12.122.X.X
12.211.X.X
64.X.X.X
64.23.X.X
74.23.211.92
and 10 more
Quote the periods, replace the X's with \d+, and join them all together with pipes:
const allowedIPpatterns = [
"10.X.X.X",
"12.122.X.X",
"12.211.X.X",
"64.X.X.X",
"64.23.X.X",
"74.23.211.92" //, etc.
];
const allowedRegexStr = '^(?:' +
allowedIPpatterns.
join('|').
replace(/\./g, '\\.').
replace(/X/g, '\\d+') +
')$';
const allowedRegexp = new RegExp(allowedRegexStr);
Then you're all set:
'10.1.2.3'.match(allowedRegexp) // => ['10.1.2.3']
'100.1.2.3'.match(allowedRegexp) // => null
How it works:
First, we have to turn the individual IP patterns into regular expressions matching their intent. One regular expression for "all IPs of the form '12.122.X.X'" is this:
^12\.122\.\d+\.\d+$
^ means the match has to start at the beginning of the string; otherwise, 112.122.X.X IPs would also match.
12 etc: digits match themselves
\.: a period in a regex matches any character at all; we want literal periods, so we put a backslash in front.
\d: shorthand for [0-9]; matches any digit.
+: means "1 or more" - 1 or more digits, in this case.
$: similarly to ^, this means the match has to end at the end of the string.
So, we turn the IP patterns into regexes like that. For an individual pattern you could use code like this:
const regexStr = `^` + ipXpattern.
replace(/\./g, '\\.').
replace(/X/g, '\\d+') +
`$`;
Which just replaces all .s with \. and Xs with \d+ and sticks the ^ and $ on the ends.
(Note the doubled backslashes; both string parsing and regex parsing use backslashes, so wherever we want a literal one to make it past the string parser to the regular expression parser, we have to double it.)
In a regular expression, the alternation this|that matches anything that matches either this or that. So we can check for a match against all the IP's at once if we to turn the list into a single regex of the form re1|re2|re3|...|relast.
Then we can do some refactoring to make the regex matcher's job easier; in this case, since all the regexes are going to have ^...$, we can move those constraints out of the individual regexes and put them on the whole thing: ^(10\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+|12\.122\.\d+\.\d+|...)$. The parentheses keep the ^ from being only part of the first pattern and $ from being only part of the last. But since plain parentheses capture as well as group, and we don't need to capture anything, I replaced them with the non-grouping version (?:..).
And in this case we can do the global search-and-replace once on the giant string instead of individually on each pattern. So the result is the code above:
const allowedRegexStr = '^(?:' +
allowedIPpatterns.
join('|').
replace(/\./g, '\\.').
replace(/X/g, '\\d+') +
')$';
That's still just a string; we have to turn it into an actual RegExp object to do the matching:
const allowedRegexp = new RegExp(allowedRegexStr);
As written, this doesn't filter out illegal IPs - for instance, 10.1234.5678.9012 would match the first pattern. If you want to limit the individual byte values to the decimal range 0-255, you can use a more complicated regex than \d+, like this:
(?:\d{1,2}|1\d{2}|2[0-4]\d|25[0-5])
That matches "any one or two digits, or '1' followed by any two digits, or '2' followed by any of '0' through '4' followed by any digit, or '25' followed by any of '0' through '5'". Replacing the \d with that turns the full string-munging expression into this:
const allowedRegexStr = '^(?:' +
allowedIPpatterns.
join('|').
replace(/\./g, '\\.').
replace(/X/g, '(?:\\d{1,2}|1\\d{2}|2[0-4]\\d|25[0-5])') +
')$';
And makes the actual regex look much more unwieldy:
^(?:10\.(?:\d{1,2}|1\d{2}|2[0-4]\d|25[0-5])\.(?:\d{1,2}|1\d{2}|2[0-4]\d|25[0-5]).(?:\d{1,2}|1\d{2}|2[0-4]\d|25[0-5])|12\.122\....
but you don't have to look at it, just match against it. :)
You could do it in regex, but it's not going to be pretty, especially since JavaScript doesn't even support verbose regexes, which means that it has to be one humongous line of regex without any comments. Furthermore, regexes are ill-suited for matching ranges of numbers. I suspect that there are better tools for dealing with this.
Well, OK, here goes (for the samples you provided):
var myregexp = /\b(?:74\.23\.211\.92|(?:12\.(?:122|211)|64\.23)\.(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|1[0-9]{2}|[1-9]?[0-9])\.(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|1[0-9]{2}|[1-9]?[0-9])|(?:10|64)\.(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|1[0-9]{2}|[1-9]?[0-9])\.(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|1[0-9]{2}|[1-9]?[0-9])\.(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|1[0-9]{2}|[1-9]?[0-9]))\b/g;
As a verbose ("readable") regex:
\b # start of number
(?: # Either match...
74\.23\.211\.92 # an explicit address
| # or
(?: # an address that starts with
12\.(?:122|211) # 12.122 or 12.211
| # or
64\.23 # 64.23
)
\. # .
(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|1[0-9]{2}|[1-9]?[0-9])\. # followed by 0..255 and a dot
(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|1[0-9]{2}|[1-9]?[0-9]) # followed by 0..255
| # or
(?:10|64) # match 10 or 64
\. # .
(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|1[0-9]{2}|[1-9]?[0-9])\. # followed by 0..255 and a dot
(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|1[0-9]{2}|[1-9]?[0-9])\. # followed by 0..255 and a dot
(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|1[0-9]{2}|[1-9]?[0-9]) # followed by 0..255
)
\b # end of number
/^(X|\d{1,3})(\.(X|\d{1,3})){3}$/ should do it.
If you don't actually need to match the "X" character you could use this:
\b(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\b
Otherwise I would use the solution cebarrett provided.
I'm not entirely sure of what you're trying to achieve here (doesn't look anyone else is either).
However, if it's validation, then here's a solution to validate an IP address that doesn't use RegEx. First, split the input string at the dot. Then using parseInt on the number, make sure it isn't higher than 255.
function ipValidator(ipAddress) {
var ipSegments = ipAddress.split('.');
for(var i=0;i<ipSegments.length;i++)
{
if(parseInt(ipSegments[i]) > 255){
return 'fail';
}
}
return 'match';
}
Running the following returns 'match':
document.write(ipValidator('10.255.255.125'));
Whereas this will return 'fail':
document.write(ipValidator('10.255.256.125'));
Here's a noted version in a jsfiddle with some examples, http://jsfiddle.net/VGp2p/2/