Develop Reference

Regex returns nothing to repeat [duplicate]

I'm new to Regex and I'm trying to work it into one of my new projects to see if I can learn it and add it to my repitoire of skills. However, I'm hitting a roadblock here.
I'm trying to see if the user's input has illegal characters in it by using the .search function as so:
if (name.search("[\[\]\?\*\+\|\{\}\\\(\)\#\.\n\r]") != -1) {
...
}
However, when I try to execute the function this line is contained it, it throws the following error for that specific line:
Uncaught SyntaxError: Invalid regular expression: /[[]?*+|{}\()#.
]/: Nothing to repeat
I can't for the life of me see what's wrong with my code. Can anyone point me in the right direction?

You need to double the backslashes used to escape the regular expression special characters. However, as #Bohemian points out, most of those backslashes aren't needed. Unfortunately, his answer suffers from the same problem as yours. What you actually want is:
The backslash is being interpreted by the code that reads the string, rather than passed to the regular expression parser. You want:
"[\\[\\]?*+|{}\\\\()#.\n\r]"
Note the quadrupled backslash. That is definitely needed. The string passed to the regular expression compiler is then identical to #Bohemian's string, and works correctly.

Building off of #Bohemian, I think the easiest approach would be to just use a regex literal, e.g.:
if (name.search(/[\[\]?*+|{}\\()#.\n\r]/) != -1) {
// ... stuff ...
}
Regex literals are nice because you don't have to escape the escape character, and some IDE's will highlight invalid regex (very helpful for me as I constantly screw them up).

For Google travelers: this stupidly unhelpful error message is also presented when you make a typo and double up the + regex operator:
Okay:
\w+
Not okay:
\w++

Firstly, in a character class [...] most characters don't need escaping - they are just literals.
So, your regex should be:
"[\[\]?*+|{}\\()#.\n\r]"
This compiles for me.

Well, in my case I had to test a Phone Number with the help of regex, and I was getting the same error,
Invalid regular expression: /+923[0-9]{2}-(?!1234567)(?!1111111)(?!7654321)[0-9]{7}/: Nothing to repeat'
So, what was the error in my case was that + operator after the / in the start of the regex. So enclosing the + operator with square brackets [+], and again sending the request, worked like a charm.
Following will work:
/[+]923[0-9]{2}-(?!1234567)(?!1111111)(?!7654321)[0-9]{7}/
This answer may be helpful for those, who got the same type of error, but their chances of getting the error from this point of view, as mine! Cheers :)

for example I faced this in express node.js when trying to create route for paths not starting with /internal
app.get(`\/(?!internal).*`, (req, res)=>{
and after long trying it just worked when passing it as a RegExp Object using new RegExp()
app.get(new RegExp("\/(?!internal).*"), (req, res)=>{
this may help if you are getting this common issue in routing

This can also happen if you begin a regex with ?.
? may function as a quantifier -- so ? may expect something else to come before it, thus the "nothing to repeat" error. Nothing preceded it in the regex string so it didn't get to quantify anything; there was nothing to repeat / nothing to quantify.
? also has another role -- if the ? is preceded by ( it may indicate the beginning of a lookaround assertion or some other special construct. See example below.
If one forgets to write the () parentheses around the following lookbehind assertion ?<=x, this will cause the OP's error:
Incorrect: const xThenFive = /?<=x5/;
Correct:
const xThenFive = /(?<=x)5/;
This /(?<=x)5/ is a positive lookbehind: we're looking for a 5 that is preceded by an x e.g. it would match the 5 in x563 but not the 5 in x652.

Regex: get string between last character occurence before a comma

I need some help with Regex.
I have this string: \\lorem\ipsum\dolor,\\sit\amet\conseteteur,\\sadipscing\elitr\sed\diam
and want to get the result: ["dolor", "conseteteur", "diam"]So in words the word between the last backslash and a comma or the end.
I've already figured out a working test, but because of reasons it won't work in neitherChrome (v44.0.2403.130) nor IE (v11.0.9600.17905) console.There i'm getting the result: ["\loremipsumdolor,", "\sitametconseteteur,", "\sadipscingelitrseddiam"]
Can you please tell me, why the online testers aren't working and how i can achieve the right result?
Thanks in advance.
PS: I've tested a few online regex testers with all the same result. (regex101.com, regexpal.com, debuggex.com, scriptular.com)

The string
'\\lorem\ipsum\dolor,\\sit\amet\conseteteur,\\sadipscing\elitr\sed\diam'
is getting escaped, if you try the following in the browser's console you'll see what happens:
var s = '\\lorem\ipsum\dolor,\\sit\amet\conseteteur,\\sadipscing\elitr\sed\diam'
console.log(s);
// prints '\loremipsumdolor,\sitametconseteteur,\sadipscingelitrseddiam'
To use your original string you have to add additional backslashes, otherwise it becomes a different one because it tries to escape anything followed by a single backslash.
The reason why it works in regexp testers is because they probably sanitize the input string to make sure it gets evaluated as-is.
Try this (added an extra \ for each of them):
str = '\\\\lorem\\ipsum\\dolor,\\\\sit\\amet\\conseteteur,\\\\sadipscing\\elitr\\sed\\diam'
re = /\\([^\\]*)(?:,|$)/g
str.match(re)
// should output ["\dolor,", "\conseteteur,", "\diam"]
UPDATE
You can't prevent the interpreter from escaping backslashes in string literals, but this functionality is coming with EcmaScript6 as String.raw
s = String.raw`\\lorem\ipsum\dolor,\\sit\amet\conseteteur,\\sadipscing\elitr\sed\diam`
Remember to use backticks instead of single quotes with String.raw.
It's working in latest Chrome, but I can't say for all other browsers, if they're moderately old, it probably isn't implemented.
Also, if you want to avoid matching the last backslash you need to:
remove the \\ at the start of your regexp
use + instead of * to avoid matching the line end (it will create an extra capture)
use a positive lookahead ?=
like this
s = String.raw`\\lorem\ipsum\dolor,\\sit\amet\conseteteur,\\sadipscing\elitr\sed\diam`;
re = /([^\\]+)(?=,|$)/g;
s.match(re);
// ["dolor", "conseteteur", "diam"]

You may try this,
string.match(/[^\\,]+(?=,|$)/gm);
DEMO

Why is regex failing when input contains a newline?

I've inherited this javascript regex from another developer and now, even though nothing has changed, it doesn't seem to match the required text. Here is the regex:
/^.*(already (active|exists|registered)).*$/i
I need it to match any text that looks like
stuff stuff already exists more stuff etc
It looks perfectly fine to me, it only looks for those 2 words together and should in theory ignore the rest of the string. In my script I check the text like this
var cardUsedRE = /^.*(already (active|exists|registered)).*$/i;
if(cardUsedRE.test(responseText)){
mdiv.className = 'userError';
mdiv.innerHTML = 'The card # has already been registered';
document.getElementById('cardErrMsg').innerHTML = arrowGif;
}
I've stepped through this in FireBug and I've seen it fail to test this string:
> Error: <detail>Card number already registered for CLP.\n</detail>
Am I missing something? What is the likely issue with this?

Here's a simplified but functionally-equivalent regex that should handle newlines:
/(already\s+(active|exists|registered))/i
Not sure why you'd ever want to lead with ^.* or end with .*$ unless your goal is specifically to prevent newlines. Otherwise it's just superfluous.
EDIT: I replaced the space with \s+ so it will be more liberal with how it handles whitespace (e.g. one space, two spaces, a tab, etc. should all match).

tldr; Use the m modifier to make . match newlines. See the MDC regular expression documentation.
Failing (note the "\n" in the string literal):
var str = "Error: <detail>Card number already registered for CLP.\n</detail>"
str.match(/^.*(already (active|exists|registered)).*$/i)
Working (note m flag for "multi-line" behavior of .):
var str = "Error: <detail>Card number already registered for CLP.\n</detail>"
str.match(/^.*(already (active|exists|registered)).*$/mi)
I would use a simpler form, however: (Adjust for definition of "space".)
var str = "Error: <detail>Card number already registered for CLP.\n</detail>";
str.match(/(?:already\s+(?:active|exists|registered))/i)
Happy coding.

URL regex does not work in javascript

I am trying to use John Gruber's URL regex in Javascript but NetBeans keeps telling me there is a syntax error and illegal errors:
var patt = "/(?i)\b((?:[a-z][\w-]+:(?:/{1,3}|[a-z0-9%])
|www\d{0,3}[.]|[a-z0-9.\-]+[.][a-z]
{2,4}/)(?:[^\s()<>]+|\(([^\s()<>]+|
(\([^\s()<>]+\)))*\))+(?:\(([^\s()<>]+|
(\([^\s()<>]+\)))*\)|[^\s`!()\[\]{};:
'".,<>?«»“”‘’]))/";
Anyone know how to solve this?

As others have said, it's the double quote. But alternatively, you can just write the regexp as a literal in javascript (but then you need to escape the forward slashes in lines 1 and 3 instead).
var regexp = /\b((?:[a-z][\w-]+:(?:\/{1,3}|[a-z0-9%])|www\d{0,3}[.]|[a-z0-9.\-]+[.][a-z]{2,4}\/)(?:[^\s()<>]+|\(([^\s()<>]+|(\([^\s()<>]+\)))*\))+(?:\(([^\s()<>]+|(\([^\s()<>]+\)))*\)|[^\s`!()\[\]{};:'".,<>?«»“”‘’]))/i;
I also moved the case-insensitive modifier to the end. Just because. (edit: Well, not just "because" - see Alan Moore's comment below)
Note: Whether you use a literal or a string, it has to be on 1 line.

put the whole expression in one line, and remove the quotes at the start and end so it looks like this var patt = /the-long-patttern/;, netbeans will still complain, but the browsers won't and thats what matters.

You should write it like this in NetBeans:
"(?i)\\b((?:[a-z][\\w-]+:(?:\\/{1,3}|[a-z0-9%])|www\\d{0,3}[.]|[a-z0-9.\\-]"
+ "+[.][a-z]{2,4}\\/)(?:[^\\s()<>]+|\\(([^\\s()<>]+|(\\([^\\s()<>]+\\)))*\\))"
+ "+(?:\\(([^\\s()<>]+|(\\([^\\s()<>]+\\)))*\\)|[^\\s`!()\\[\\]{};:'\".,<>?«»“”‘’]))";

How to search csv string and return a match by using a Javascript regex

I'm trying to extract the first user-right from semicolon separated string which matches a pattern.
Users rights are stored in format:
LAA;LA_1;LA_2;LE_3;
String is empty if user does not have any rights.
My best solution so far is to use the following regex in regex.replace statement:
.*?;(LA_[^;]*)?.*
(The question mark at the end of group is for the purpose of matching the whole line in case user has not the right and replace it with empty string to signal that she doesn't have it.)
However, it doesn't work correctly in case the searched right is in the first position:
LA_1;LA_2;LE_3;
It is easy to fix it by just adding a semicolon at the beginning of line before regex replace but my question is, why doesn't the following regex match it?
.*?(?:(?:^|;)(LA_[^;]*))?.*
I have tried numerous other regular expressions to find the solution but so far without success.

I am not sure I get your question right, but in regards to the regular expressions you are using, you are overcomplicating them for no clear reason (at least not to me). You might want something like:
function getFirstRight(rights) {
var m = rights.match(/(^|;)(LA_[^;]*)/)
return m ? m[2] : "";
}

You could just split the string first:
function getFirstRight(rights)
{
return rights.split(";",1)[0] || "";
}

To answer the specific question "why doesn't the following regex match it?", one problem is the mix of this at the beginning:
.*?
eventually followed by:
^|;
Which might be like saying, skip over any extra characters until you reach either the start or a semicolon. But you can't skip over anything and then later arrive at the start (unless it involves newlines in a multiline string).
Something like this works:
.*?(\bLA_[^;]).*
Meaning, skip over characters until a word boundary followed by "LA_".