I have been using Glassfish 3.1 for a web project, even after updating a JavaScript file, and re-publishing the whole project onto the glassfish server, server seems to execute the older version of file.
I have tried, restarting the server, but everything went in vain.
Thanks in advance.
In my answer I assume you are entirely sure that even if you packed an updated script still the old script version is rendered on the page. However I would advice to double check it.
You have some options here:
First option
If it is a developer machine and just one time problem with cache you can quickly fix it by deleting applications, generated and osgi-cache folders from your GLASSFISH_HOME. Before you should stop your AS though.
Second option
If you do not want your page to be cashed you can create a javax.servlet.Filter and add Expires header to a response in the doFilter method. If you use some date in the past the page will never be cached.
((HttpServletResponse) resp).addHeader("Expires", "Mon, 8 Aug 2006 10:00:00 GMT");
Alternatively you can calculate a value and that would be your strategy for caching.
Third Option
You can add a parameter to your page URL. For example http(s)://{YOUR_URL}/${PATH_TO_PAGE}?version={APP_VERSION}
You do not have to read or process this parameter, so you do not care about either its name or value, but if in your application you will increase {APP_VERSION} each time you upgrade your app and navigate to the page adding this parameter, it will make the page URL unique for each application version and you can be sure cached version from previous version is not used. This way of course a bit awkward, nevertheless it is still an option. BTW this is a good way to check if you really ran into a cache related problem. Just add a random parameter to your page URL with a random value and you should see the latest script version.
Forth Option
You can somehow combine these option
Hope that helps
This is not a Glassfish problem. This is because your browser caches the js files.
You just have to clear your browser cache.
Is there a way I can put some code on my page so when someone visits a site, it clears the browser cache, so they can view the changes?
Languages used: ASP.NET, VB.NET, and of course HTML, CSS, and jQuery.
If this is about .css and .js changes, then one way is "cache busting" by appending something like "_versionNo" to the file name for each release. For example:
script_1.0.css // This is the URL for release 1.0
script_1.1.css // This is the URL for release 1.1
script_1.2.css // etc.
or after the file name:
script.css?v=1.0 // This is the URL for release 1.0
script.css?v=1.1 // This is the URL for release 1.1
script.css?v=1.2 // etc.
You can check this link to see how it could work.
Look into the cache-control and the expires META Tag.
<META HTTP-EQUIV="CACHE-CONTROL" CONTENT="NO-CACHE">
<META HTTP-EQUIV="EXPIRES" CONTENT="Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:12:01 GMT">
Another common practices is to append constantly-changing strings to the end of the requested files. For instance:
<script type="text/javascript" src="main.js?v=12392823"></script>
Update 2012
This is an old question but I think it needs a more up to date answer because now there is a way to have more control of website caching.
In Offline Web Applications (which is really any HTML5 website) applicationCache.swapCache() can be used to update the cached version of your website without the need for manually reloading the page.
This is a code example from the Beginner's Guide to Using the Application Cache on HTML5 Rocks explaining how to update users to the newest version of your site:
// Check if a new cache is available on page load.
window.addEventListener('load', function(e) {
window.applicationCache.addEventListener('updateready', function(e) {
if (window.applicationCache.status == window.applicationCache.UPDATEREADY) {
// Browser downloaded a new app cache.
// Swap it in and reload the page to get the new hotness.
window.applicationCache.swapCache();
if (confirm('A new version of this site is available. Load it?')) {
window.location.reload();
}
} else {
// Manifest didn't changed. Nothing new to server.
}
}, false);
}, false);
See also Using the application cache on Mozilla Developer Network for more info.
Update 2016
Things change quickly on the Web.
This question was asked in 2009 and in 2012 I posted an update about a new way to handle the problem described in the question. Another 4 years passed and now it seems that it is already deprecated. Thanks to cgaldiolo for pointing it out in the comments.
Currently, as of July 2016, the HTML Standard, Section 7.9, Offline Web applications includes a deprecation warning:
This feature is in the process of being removed from the Web platform.
(This is a long process that takes many years.) Using any of the
offline Web application features at this time is highly discouraged.
Use service workers instead.
So does Using the application cache on Mozilla Developer Network that I referenced in 2012:
Deprecated This feature has been removed from the Web standards.
Though some browsers may still support it, it is in the process of
being dropped. Do not use it in old or new projects. Pages or Web apps
using it may break at any time.
See also Bug 1204581 - Add a deprecation notice for AppCache if service worker fetch interception is enabled.
Not as such. One method is to send the appropriate headers when delivering content to force the browser to reload:
Making sure a web page is not cached, across all browsers.
If your search for "cache header" or something similar here on SO, you'll find ASP.NET specific examples.
Another, less clean but sometimes only way if you can't control the headers on server side, is adding a random GET parameter to the resource that is being called:
myimage.gif?random=1923849839
I had similiar problem and this is how I solved it:
In index.html file I've added manifest:
<html manifest="cache.manifest">
In <head> section included script updating the cache:
<script type="text/javascript" src="update_cache.js"></script>
In <body> section I've inserted onload function:
<body onload="checkForUpdate()">
In cache.manifest I've put all files I want to cache. It is important now that it works in my case (Apache) just by updating each time the "version" comment. It is also an option to name files with "?ver=001" or something at the end of name but it's not needed. Changing just # version 1.01 triggers cache update event.
CACHE MANIFEST
# version 1.01
style.css
imgs/logo.png
#all other files
It's important to include 1., 2. and 3. points only in index.html. Otherwise
GET http://foo.bar/resource.ext net::ERR_FAILED
occurs because every "child" file tries to cache the page while the page is already cached.
In update_cache.js file I've put this code:
function checkForUpdate()
{
if (window.applicationCache != undefined && window.applicationCache != null)
{
window.applicationCache.addEventListener('updateready', updateApplication);
}
}
function updateApplication(event)
{
if (window.applicationCache.status != 4) return;
window.applicationCache.removeEventListener('updateready', updateApplication);
window.applicationCache.swapCache();
window.location.reload();
}
Now you just change files and in manifest you have to update version comment. Now visiting index.html page will update the cache.
The parts of solution aren't mine but I've found them through internet and put together so that it works.
For static resources right caching would be to use query parameters with value of each deployment or file version. This will have effect of clearing cache after each deployment.
/Content/css/Site.css?version={FileVersionNumber}
Here is ASP.NET MVC example.
<link href="#Url.Content("~/Content/Css/Reset.css")?version=#this.GetType().Assembly.GetName().Version" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
Don't forget to update assembly version.
I had a case where I would take photos of clients online and would need to update the div if a photo is changed. Browser was still showing the old photo. So I used the hack of calling a random GET variable, which would be unique every time. Here it is if it could help anybody
<img src="/photos/userid_73.jpg?random=<?php echo rand() ?>" ...
EDIT
As pointed out by others, following is much more efficient solution since it will reload images only when they are changed, identifying this change by the file size:
<img src="/photos/userid_73.jpg?modified=<? filemtime("/photos/userid_73.jpg")?>"
A lot of answers are missing the point - most developers are well aware that turning off the cache is inefficient. However, there are many common circumstances where efficiency is unimportant and default cache behavior is badly broken.
These include nested, iterative script testing (the big one!) and broken third party software workarounds. None of the solutions given here are adequate to address such common scenarios. Most web browsers are far too aggressive caching and provide no sensible means to avoid these problems.
Updating the URL to the following works for me:
/custom.js?id=1
By adding a unique number after ?id= and incrementing it for new changes, users do not have to press CTRL + F5 to refresh the cache. Alternatively, you can append hash or string version of the current time or Epoch after ?id=
Something like ?id=1520606295
<meta http-equiv="pragma" content="no-cache" />
Also see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/126772/how-to-force-a-web-browser-not-to-cache-images
Here is the MDSN page on setting caching in ASP.NET.
Response.Cache.SetExpires(DateTime.Now.AddSeconds(60))
Response.Cache.SetCacheability(HttpCacheability.Public)
Response.Cache.SetValidUntilExpires(False)
Response.Cache.VaryByParams("Category") = True
If Response.Cache.VaryByParams("Category") Then
'...
End If
Not sure if that might really help you but that's how caching should work on any browser. When the browser request a file, it should always send a request to the server unless there is a "offline" mode. The server will read some parameters like date modified or etags.
The server will return a 304 error response for NOT MODIFIED and the browser will have to use its cache. If the etag doesn't validate on server side or the modified date is below the current modified date, the server should return the new content with the new modified date or etags or both.
If there is no caching data sent to the browser, I guess the behavior is undetermined, the browser may or may not cache file that don't tell how they are cached. If you set caching parameters in the response it will cache your files correctly and the server then may choose to return a 304 error, or the new content.
This is how it should be done. Using random params or version number in urls is more like a hack than anything.
http://www.checkupdown.com/status/E304.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_ETag
http://www.xpertdeveloper.com/2011/03/last-modified-header-vs-expire-header-vs-etag/
After reading I saw that there is also a expire date. If you have problem, it might be that you have a expire date set up. In other words, when the browser will cache your file, since it has a expiry date, it shouldn't have to request it again before that date. In other words, it will never ask the file to the server and will never receive a 304 not modified. It will simply use the cache until the expiry date is reached or cache is cleared.
So that is my guess, you have some sort of expiry date and you should use last-modified etags or a mix of it all and make sure that there is no expire date.
If people tends to refresh a lot and the file doesn't get changed a lot, then it might be wise to set a big expiry date.
My 2 cents!
I implemented this simple solution that works for me (not yet on production environment):
function verificarNovaVersio() {
var sVersio = localStorage['gcf_versio'+ location.pathname] || 'v00.0.0000';
$.ajax({
url: "./versio.txt"
, dataType: 'text'
, cache: false
, contentType: false
, processData: false
, type: 'post'
}).done(function(sVersioFitxer) {
console.log('Versió App: '+ sVersioFitxer +', Versió Caché: '+ sVersio);
if (sVersio < (sVersioFitxer || 'v00.0.0000')) {
localStorage['gcf_versio'+ location.pathname] = sVersioFitxer;
location.reload(true);
}
});
}
I've a little file located where the html are:
"versio.txt":
v00.5.0014
This function is called in all of my pages, so when loading it checks if the localStorage's version value is lower than the current version and does a
location.reload(true);
...to force reload from server instead from cache.
(obviously, instead of localStorage you can use cookies or other persistent client storage)
I opted for this solution for its simplicity, because only mantaining a single file "versio.txt" will force the full site to reload.
The queryString method is hard to implement and is also cached (if you change from v1.1 to a previous version will load from cache, then it means that the cache is not flushed, keeping all previous versions at cache).
I'm a little newbie and I'd apreciate your professional check & review to ensure my method is a good approach.
Hope it helps.
In addition to setting Cache-control: no-cache, you should also set the Expires header to -1 if you would like the local copy to be refreshed each time (some versions of IE seem to require this).
See HTTP Cache - check with the server, always sending If-Modified-Since
There is one trick that can be used.The trick is to append a parameter/string to the file name in the script tag and change it when you file changes.
<script src="myfile.js?version=1.0.0"></script>
The browser interprets the whole string as the file path even though what comes after the "?" are parameters. So wat happens now is that next time when you update your file just change the number in the script tag on your website (Example <script src="myfile.js?version=1.0.1"></script>) and each users browser will see the file has changed and grab a new copy.
Force browsers to clear cache or reload correct data? I have tried most of the solutions described in stackoverflow, some work, but after a little while, it does cache eventually and display the previous loaded script or file. Is there another way that would clear the cache (css, js, etc) and actually work on all browsers?
I found so far that specific resources can be reloaded individually if you change the date and time on your files on the server. "Clearing cache" is not as easy as it should be. Instead of clearing cache on my browsers, I realized that "touching" the server files cached will actually change the date and time of the source file cached on the server (Tested on Edge, Chrome and Firefox) and most browsers will automatically download the most current fresh copy of whats on your server (code, graphics any multimedia too). I suggest you just copy the most current scripts on the server and "do the touch thing" solution before your program runs, so it will change the date of all your problem files to a most current date and time, then it downloads a fresh copy to your browser:
<?php
touch('/www/sample/file1.css');
touch('/www/sample/file2.js');
?>
then ... the rest of your program...
It took me some time to resolve this issue (as many browsers act differently to different commands, but they all check time of files and compare to your downloaded copy in your browser, if different date and time, will do the refresh), If you can't go the supposed right way, there is always another usable and better solution to it. Best Regards and happy camping. By the way touch(); or alternatives work in many programming languages inclusive in javascript bash sh php and you can include or call them in html.
For webpack users:-
I added time with chunkhash in my webpack config. This solved my problem of invalidating cache on each deployment. Also we need to take care that index.html/ asset.manifest is not cached both in your CDN or browser. Config of chunk name in webpack config will look like this:-
fileName: [chunkhash]-${Date.now()}.js
or If you are using contenthash then
fileName: [contenthash]-${Date.now()}.js
This is the simple solution I used to solve in one of my applications using PHP.
All JS and CSS files are placed in a folder with version name. Example : "1.0.01"
root\1.0.01\JS
root\1.0.01\CSS
Created a Helper and Defined the version Number there
<?php
function system_version()
{
return '1.0.07';
}
And Linked JS and SCC Files like below
<script src="<?= base_url(); ?>/<?= system_version();?>/js/generators.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="<?= base_url(); ?>/<?= system_version(); ?>/css/view-checklist.css" />
Whenever I make changes to any JS or CSS file, I change the System Verson in Helper and rename the folder and deploy it.
I had the same problem, all i did was change the file names which are linked to my index.html file and then went into the index.html file and updated their names, not the best practice but if it works it works. The browser sees them as new files so they get redownloaded on to the users device.
example:
I want to update a css file, its named styles.css, change it to styless.css
Go into index.html and update , and change it to
in case interested I've found my solution to get browsers refreshing .css and .js in the context of .NET MVC (.net fw 4.8) and the use of bundles.
I wanted to make browsers refresh cached files only after a new assembly is deployed.
Buinding on Paulius Zaliaduonis response, my solution is as follows:
store your application base url in the web config app settings (the HttpContext is not yet available at runtime during the RegisterBundle...), then make this parameter changing according to the configuration (debug, staging, release...) by the xml transform
In BundleConfig RegisterBundles get the assembly version by the means of reflection, and...
...change the default tag format of both styles and scripts so that the bundling system generates link and script tags appending a query string parameter on them.
Here is the code
public static void RegisterBundles(BundleCollection bundles)
{
string baseUrl = system.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["by.app.base.url"].ToString();
string assemblyVersion = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetName().Version.ToString();
Styles.DefaultTagFormat = $"<link href='{baseUrl}{{0}}?v={assemblyVersion}' rel='stylesheet'/>";
Scripts.DefaultTagFormat = $"<script src='{baseUrl}{{0}}?v={assemblyVersion}'></script>";
}
You'll get tags like
<script src="https://example.org/myscriptfilepath/script.js?v={myassemblyversion}"></script>
you just need to remember to to build a new version before deploying.
Ciao
2023 onward
At the time of writing, many web browsers support the Clear-Site-Data HTTP header [MDN reference]. To instruct the client web browser to clear the cache for the website domain and subdomains, set the following header in the HTTP response from the server:
Clear-Site-Data: "cache"
Alternatively, the following header may be better supported across browsers, but it clears other website data, such as localStorage and cookies, in addition to the cache.
Clear-Site-Data: "*"
However note that intermediate caches (e.g. a CDN) may not understand or respect this header, so intermediate caches may still respond with previously cached data.
Do you want to clear the cache, or just make sure your current (changed?) page is not cached?
If the latter, it should be as simple as
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Pragma" CONTENT="no-cache">
Is there a way to force the clients of a webpage to reload the cache (i.e. images, javascript, etc) after a server has been pushed an update to the code base? We get a lot of help desk calls asking why certain functionality no longer works. A simple hard refresh fixes the problems as it downloads the newly updated javascript file.
For specifics we are using Glassfish 3.x. and JSF 2.1.x. This would apply to more than just JSF of course.
To describe what behavior I hope is possible:
Website A has two images and two javascript files. A user visits the site and the 4 files get cached. As far as I'm concerned, no need to "re-download" said files unless user specifically forces a "hard" refresh or clears their cache. Once a site is pushed an update to one of the files, the server could have some sort of metadata in the header informing the client of said update. If the client chooses, the new files would be downloaded.
What I don't want to do is put meta-tag in the header of a page to force nothing from ever being cached...I just want something that tells the client an update has occurred and it should get the latest once something has been updated. I suppose this would just be some sort of versioning on the client side.
Thanks for your time!
The correct way to handle this is with changing the URL convention for your resources. For example, we have it as:
/resources/js/fileName.js
To get the browser to still cache the file, but do it the proper way with versioning, is by adding something to the URL. Adding a value to the querystring doesn't allow caching, so the place to put it is after /resources/.
A reference for querystring caching: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec13.html#sec13.9
So for example, your URLs would look like:
/resources/1234/js/fileName.js
So what you could do is use the project's version number (or some value in a properties/config file that you manually change when you want cached files to be reloaded) since this number should change only when the project is modified. So your URL could look like:
/resources/cacheholder${project.version}/js/fileName.js
That should be easy enough.
The problem now is with mapping the URL, since that value in the middle is dynamic. The way we overcame that is with a URL rewriting module that allowed us to filter URLs before they got to our application. The rewrite watched for URLs that looked like:
/resources/cacheholder______/whatever
And removed the cacheholder_______/ part. After the rewrite, it looked like a normal request, and the server would respond with the correct file, without any other specific mapping/logic...the point is that the browser thought it was a new file (even though it really wasn't), so it requested it, and the server figures it out and serves the correct file (even though it's a "weird" URL).
Of course, another option is to add this dynamic string to the filename itself, and then use the rewrite tool to remove it. Either way, the same thing is done - targeting a string of text during rewrite, and removing it. This allows you to fool the browser, but not the server :)
UPDATE:
An alternative that I really like is to set the filename based on the contents, and cache that. For example, that could be done with a hash. Of course, this type of thing isn't something you'd manually do and save to your project (hopefully); it's something your application/framework should handle. For example, in Grails, there's a plugin that "hashes and caches" resources, so that the following occurs:
Every resource is checked
A new file (or mapping to this file) is created, with a name that is the hash of its contents
When adding <script>/<link> tags to your page, the hashed name is used
When the hash-named file is requested, it serves the original resource
The hash-named file is cached "forever"
What's cool about this setup is that you don't have to worry about caching correctly - just set the files to cache forever, and the hashing should take care of files/mappings being available based on content. It also provides the ability for rollbacks/undos to already be cached and loaded quickly.
i use a no-cache parameter for this situations...
a have a string constant value like (from config file)
$no_cache = "v11";
and in pages, i use assets like
<img src="a.jpg?nc=$no_cache">
and when i update my code, just change the $no_cache value, and it works like a charm.
I'm using CKEditor which is a multi-file library so the main js file calls other js and css files. I'm noticing that after the main file is called, additional files have a ?t=CODE added to them, so something like this, but the actual files don't have that extra ?t=B49E5BQ at the end.
http://site.com/ckeditor/config.js?t=B49E5BQ
http://site.com/ckeditor/extra.js?t=B49E5BQ
What's the point of this
P.S. Please feel free to add additional tags, because I'm not sure about this one.
This sort of trailing data is sometimes put into URLs for resources files like scripts/stylesheets so as to prevent caching of resources across re-deployments.
Whenever you change a resource, you change the code in HTML files/templates which require that resource, so that clients re-request the resource from the server the next time they load the page.
I would guess that the URL parameter is added to bypass any caching mechanisms. When a client sees the same URL with a different query parameter, that usually means the client can't use the cached version of the resource (in this case a JS file) and go to the server to fetch the latest version.
In HTTP, if a URL is the same in every way except for the URL parameters, a client can not assume that those files/resources are the same resulting object.
Which means:
http://site.com/ckeditor/config.js?t=B49E5BQ
is not the same as:
http://site.com/ckeditor/config.js?t=1234
It must be there to prevent caching.
I do this occasionally for images and script files. In my case, it's a meaningless argument (usually datetime) that just forces the browser to fetch a new copy every time.
If the parameter keeps changing, those files won't be cached on the client side.
Often this is easier than say, changing the name of the file to include a version number (jquery-1.6.2.js works nicely, but do you want to rename config.js to config-1.0.js, -2.0, etc. every time you make a change?
Like all the other answers, this simply forces the browser to grab the latest version when the querystring (?t=B49E5BQ) is changed. In our case, we simply add the date (?06022011).
If this has been asked before, I apologize but this is kinda of a hard question to search for. This is the first time I have come across this in all my years of web development, so I'm pretty curious.
I am editing some HTML files for a website, and I have noticed that in the src attribute of the script tags that the previous author appended a question mark followed by data.
Ex: <script src="./js/somefile.js?version=3.2"></script>
I know that this is used in some languages for value passing in GET request, such as PHP, but as I far as I ever knew, this wasn't done in javascript - at least in calling a javascript file. Does anyone know what this does, if anything?
EDIT: Wow, a lot of responses. Thanks one and all. And since a lot of people are saying similar things, I will post an global update instead of commenting everyone.
In this case the javascript files are static, hence my curiosity. I have also opened them up and did not see anything attempt to access variables on file load. I've never thought about caching or plain version control, both which seam more likely in this circumstance.
I believe what the author was doing was ensuring that if he creates version 3.3 of his script he can change the version= in the url of the script to ensure that users download the new file instead of running off of the old script cached in their browser.
So in this case it is part of the caching strategy.
My guess is it's so if he publishes a new version of the JavaScript file, he can bump the version in the HTML documents. This will not do anything server-side when requested, but it causes the browser to treat it as a different file, effectively forcing the browser to re-fetch the script and bypass the local cache of the file.
This way, you can set a really high cache time (like a week or a month!) but not sacrifice the ability to update scripts frequently if necessary.
What you have to remember is that this ./js/somefile.js?version=3.2 doesn't have to be a physical file. It can be a page which creates the file on the fly. So you could have it where the request says, "Hey give me version 3 of this js file," and the server side code creates it and writes it to the output stream.
The other option is to force the browser to not cache the file and pull down the new one when it makes the request. Since the URI changed, it will think the file is completely new.
A (well-configured) web server will send static files like JavaScript source code once and tell the web browser to cache that file locally for a certain period of time (could be a day, a week, a month, or longer). When the browser sees another request for that same file, it will just use that version instead of getting new code from the server.
If the URL changes -- for example by adding a query string -- then the browser suspects that its cached version is no good and gets a new one. As such, the ? helps developers say "Oops, I changed this file, make sure the browser gets a new copy."
In this case it's probably being used to ensure the source file isn't cached between versions.
Of course, it could also be used server side to generate the javascript file, without knowing what you have on the other end of the request, it's difficult to be definitive.
BTW, the ?... portion of the url is called the query string.
this is used to guarantee that the browser downloads a new version of the script when available. The version number in the url is incremented each time a new version is deployed so that the browser see it as a different file.
Just because the file extension is .js doesn't mean that the target is an actual .js file. They could set up their web server to pass the requested URL to a script (or literally have a script named somefile.js) and have that interpret the filename and version.
The query string has nothing to do with the javascript. Some server side code is hosting up a different version depending on that querystring it appears.
You should never assume anything about paths in a URL. The extension on a path in a URL doesn't really tell you anything. URLs can be completely dynamic and served by some server side code or can rewritten in web servers dynamically.
Now it is common to add a querystring to urls when loading javascript files to prevent client side caching. If the page updates and references a new version of the script then the page can bust through and cause the client to refresh it's script.