Develop Reference

Creating interactive SVG maps for a web portal

I'm creating a web portal with maps in SVG format and set in the HTML code using <object> tag in order to preserve the possibility of interactivity. My main problem is how to create and support an interactive SVG format in the browser?
As far as I have researched there are several options:
SMIL animation directly in SVG,
CSS animation,
JavaScript libraries.
It seems to me that this last option has the most potential. There are many libraries (Snap.svg, svg.js, Velocity.js, d3.js, jVectorMap.js, GreenSock ....) to use, so I would appreciate if someone could give some tips on which of them to use.
Do I need to use them within the SVG directly using the <script> tag or using an external .js file? To my knowledge, jQuery can't be used directly within SVG.

In fact, all three variants work more or less with different advantages and drawbacks.
1. SMIL
SMIL is easy to use inside of your SVG and allows modifying attributes of your SVG object directly. However, if you want/need to support Internet Explorer or Edge, you don't have much luck (see CanIUse).
Chrome 45 deprecated SMIL in favor of CSS animations and Web animations. But the Chrome developers recently suspended their intent (see this StackOverflow answer).
2. CSS Animations
These are a good alternative for animation of SVGs. The implementation is normally very fast and smooth, as far as I saw it. Browser support is better especially with Microsoft Browsers. So I would really recommend it.
If you need some more user interaction, you get to the limits of CSS animations quickly. Some interaction is possible, but if you want more, you need JavaScript.
3. JavaScript libraries
jQuery really have serious problems with SVGs, but I think it is better doing without jQuery (for both, jQuery and your software) because if it would support SVGs, it would be even larger and slower. However, if you already have jQuery included, it is possible to select elements and then animate them without jQuery.
Other libraries are more specialized for SVG and work really great (I myself worked with d3.js with good results).
Recommendation
If you don't need to support Microsoft browsers, then SMIL can be an easy and compact way to define certain animations.
If you need those browsers, I would recommend trying CSS animations. But if that seems too static, one of the JavaScript libraries may help.

Is WebGL or Canvas the only way to get SVG Keyframe Animations Hardware Accelerated?

What I'm looking is a flash alternative for mobile phones using html5.
I was looking into SVG and it seems the only way to get hardware acceleration is to use CSS transforms on it. But CSS transforms aren't enough, I want to animate the actual nodes that make up a vector (ie, points on a path) so I could get more sophisticated character animation. To do this I was looking at some gui based editors.
I checked what adobe has been up to and they seem to have killed Edge Animate and rebranded Flash as "Animate CC" for 2016.
http://blogs.adobe.com/creativecloud/update-about-edge-tools-and-services/
https://blogs.adobe.com/flashpro/welcome-adobe-animate-cc-a-new-era-for-flash-professional/
But reading up on "Animate CC" I see that it exports vector animations to either Canvas or WebGL. Which I think is due to them not getting hardware acceleration with native SVG via SMIL or using javascript.
https://css-tricks.com/guide-svg-animations-smil/
Another one is http://www.animatron.com which converts everything to canvas as well.
So my question is, in order to do keyframe animations on nodes within a vector path, a vector needs to be converted to either WebGL or Canvas for it to be hardware accelerated on mobile?
p.s I prefer using SVG as it's loaded in the DOM and I can manipulate things with jquery. This is for a mobile game that uses vectors (svg) as its base but I'd like to incorporate animations too - beyond the basic css transforms. I wish there was a way to have a .svg file that not only contains the vector information but also the animation info. so I could load this .svg file. and then in javascript go:
character1.play('animation1') or something. If SMIL worked fast I'm sure editors like adobe would make it as simple as that.
EDIT: I just read that Chrome 45 killed SMIL in favor of "web animations" and css.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/SVG/SVG_animation_with_SMIL
And as Kaiido mentioned in the comments IE never supported smil so maybe that's why adobe never exported to it (?).
http://caniuse.com/#feat=svg-smil
also I never saw any examples online that show hardware accelerated path animation with smil, if any of you guys find a link pls let me know.
EDIT #2: I'm thinking of giving up my wishful thinking and instead looking at vector to canvas exporters like animatron.com. However, it doesn't seem like canvas is even hardware accelerated or fast like css3 transforms. I loaded some animations from animatron in my old iPhone 4s/iOS 8 and it's jittery and slow for example:
https://www.animatron.com/project/1953f3526e5b2ec4eef429c8
whereas css3 transform animations always run very smooth...
I still haven't tested vector to webgl.. but I think that's why adobe eventually chose to use it for their vector animations since canvas is slow and svg is limited.
EDIT #3: sure enough it seems like webgl is the way to go (unless someone finds a way to do this with native svg) http://www.yeahbutisitflash.com/?p=7231 .. this works fast in my iphone 4s/ios8.. I currently think this is the only way to do what I want: hardware accelerated vector based animation (however the graphics don't look as crisp as I'd want them.. webgl kinda messed with that I think).
but this is why I think Edge Animate got killed cause they were trying to create a tool that took advantage of css3 transforms, but ppl want to animate vector nodes so they went back to Flash and rebranded it. (another note: the above webgl anim doesn't work so well on my galaxy S4/kitkat android phone.. so this is mainly for newer devices/OSs)
EDIT #4: come to think of it. it'd be a pain to have multiple webgl contexts running in my program. so if I had 10 animated characters I'd have to have 10 webgl contexts which would be intense for a mobile device.. unless I chose to do the whole game in flash, and then I'd have one big webgl context after I export it. but I prefer to work in the dom. oh well css3 transforms for the meantime.. :/
EDIT #5 - Dec 2016: I'm now using svg/javascript with snap.svg. modern phones seem fast enough.
Other Useful Links I Found:
http://www.crmarsh.com/svg-performance/

Canvas is (as far as i know) software accelerated. So it's rendered by the processor (CPU). The processor (cause of them pixels) ain't that good at graphical stuff but for simple things it would be enough. And it runs everywhere, where there is a processor.
If you want to have better performance on hardware accelerated devices which most modern smartphones are, you need webgl. But you can export your stuff in webgl from adobe CC. Older smartphones are not very optimized on hardware acceleration so please check with your target group what devices they have and try to run your app on one of the slowest devices.
I would not use SVG. SVG is even worse than DOM. You can be faster manipulating HTML in javascript than SVG. I don't know why but it is damn slow. SVG is just an alternative if you want to have scalable graphics or charts and that's what it is made for. To animate in SVG is a pain. Don't do it. It is not optimized for animation.
CSS-Transform is a prototype-like and will not help you with keyframe animation. But it has potential to have an eye on it.
Does this help you?

This library/plugin might be exactly what you are looking for: Greensock SVG Morph Plugin. It seems to perform pretty well on mobile, not sure how well it performs on devices mentioned by you.
It's also not GPU accelerated but Greensock Animation Platform seems to perform extremely well even on mobile devices.

I think its a difficult question to answer as there's so many issues with different browsers. Some don't support SMIL transforms well (or being deprecated, but as mentioned there are fills for it), some don't support CSS3 transforms on SVG elements at all, so most of the 'solutions' out there, have some issue that may need to be compromised on. I think one browser doesn't support d attribute morph properly, but I can't recall which (so test this early on with required browsers if you do go down this route).
Canvas does typically seem to perform better on mobile for most animation I've seen or played with, certainly as the number of objects increases on page.
Other alternatives to webGL that was mentioned..
One option that kinda springs to mind is fabric.js, which is a canvas approach to SVG. It will take the same commands, elements as SVG, but display it on an HTML5 canvas. Turn off drag/freetransform within it (as I think its slowed down a bit with this if it needs extra checks), and I think it will be a bit faster, but its a while since I've played. This could be an interesting approach if you don't need specific DOM element access, but would be fine if you are ok with a similar object based setup.
If you insist on using SVG, then I would look at integrating it with another library (or even 2). Snap or SVG.js are both decent, but can be a bit slow. However, I would experiment with using Velocity.js or React.js with that svg library, as they have some methods that can squeeze out a bit more performance. Also GSAP may be worth a look.

There is no general answer to this, it depends on the browser implementation and your hardware, but ... for the long term solution I would bet on WebGL because it uses the GPU and will ultimately dominate.
WebGL is not well supported right now (2016), and it potentially comes with security issues.
Also see: https://css-tricks.com/rendering-svg-paths-in-webgl/
Canvas is better at working on raw 2d pixel buffers (+ alpha channel) and is slow for higher resolution+animation.
You could use some dual lib like Pixi though.

If you don't mind the k-weight increasing a bit and are comfortable using flash, the easiest and the fastest solution would be to use Animate CC (It's exactly Flash, without the symbol filters and gives canvas output instead of swf).

Can we use canvas.toDataURL on IE7 and IE8?

I am using toDataURL() method of a canvas object. It works on IE9 and Chrome.
But it is not supporting for IE7 and IE8. I found this link
https://github.com/sampula/SVG.toDataURL/commit/9b59af148b7f14d41974cf318eed6f84c8c91062
It extends SVG to use toDataURL(). But in its implementation, it again uses canvas.toDataURL(). I am using Google's API (jquery.flot.js) for plotting all the graphs graphs. But it also uses canvas to plot the graph. So, SVG is not an option.
I there ever a way to use canvas.toDataURL() or something similar for IE7 and IE8.
Thanks in advance

IE7/8 does not support either Canvas or SVG.
It does however support VML, which is a vector language similar to SVG, and there are a number of javascript-based hacks for IE that use its VML functionality to emulate both Canvas and SVG in this older browser.
The most well known IE-Canvas hack is this one: http://code.google.com/p/explorercanvas/
I haven't spent much time with it myself, so I can't vouch for whether it can do specific functionality such as the toDataURL() method you're asking about, but if you can't do it with this, then it's unlikely to be possible at all.
I mentioned that there are similar tools for VML->SVG as well. If that's of interest to you, then you might want to look into this one: http://code.google.com/p/svg2vml/
Bear in mind that no matter how clever these hacks are, there is always a fundamental issue of performance. IE7/8's javascript interpreter is very slow by modern standards, and these are javascript-based tools trying to shoehorn very modern functionality into this old browser. They may well work, but don't try to do anything too clever with your canvas or SVG, or you'll kill the browser.
Finally, since you mentioned that you're using all this to draw graphs, I will point out the graphing module of the Raphael library. Raphael is a library which draws SVG graphics on all browsers (falling back to VML for IE). The graphing module provides all the usual graph types, wrapped in an extremely easy-to-use javascript API. And it is fully cross-browser compatible -- it works on all desktop browsers out of the box from the latest Chrome and Firefox all the way back to IE6. If you're struggling with cross-browser compatibility with the tools you're using now, you may want to switch to this library.
Hope that helps.

I have recently created an application in which I had to use toDataURL() but I was not able to find any way to do this in IE7/8. My application was an online image editor in which user was able to save the canvas contents. I believe there is not way we can use this method in IE7/8.

Modernizr, html5shiv, ie7.js, and CSS3 Pie. Which to use and when?

I'm just starting to use HTML5 and CSS3 in my documents.
I understand the need for JavaScript to bring Internet Explorer up to speed with these new tags and styles, but I don't know which to use and when!
My plan was to use html5shiv and IE9.js to look after the HTML5 tags as well as the transparent pngs (and whatever other pesky errors they fix) but then Modernizr and CSS3 Pie were brought to my attention.
My question is, if I use Modernizr, does it look after my need for html5shiv as well as IE9.js? Or should I include these as well? What is the overlap, if any?
And what does CSS3 Pie do that Modernizr or the others doesn't? Or vice versa?
I appreciate your guys help. Let me know what you do!?

I've got extensive experience with all of these, having used them for a few years each.
Modernizr
Includes HTML5shiv functionality
Also does a lot more – if you don't use the other features, then don't use it, it does slow down page loads, but is worth it if you need it!
HTML5shiv
Very small, just fixes html5 elements in IE, nothing else.
CSS3PIE
Lets you use border-radius, gradients and box shadow in older versions of IE. Also can allow PNGs in IE 6. Adds a noticeable delay to page load.
ie7.js (and ie9.js)
Gives you many CSS3 selectors, min and max width, multiple classes and fixed positioning. Also can have a png fix if you like. Doesn't seem to slow things down much.
Conclusion
My advice would fall into two categories:
If you are just using the new (is 2 years new on the internet?!) elements, and CSS3 selectors, then use ie9.js + the html5shiv. This is lightweight, and just lets you get on with things without having to remember that IE6 doesn't support anything.
If you are using a lot of CSS3 stuff, then CSS3PIE will sort out border-radius and box-shadow. The gradient support seems a little flaky, so I've always used a fallback image instead. Modernizr lets you easily deliver different properties to browsers with different support. I've mainly used this for determining whether a browser has CSS transitions and transforms, as they are useful for any image sliders or content carousels. It's worth using the customisation tool to only include the functionality that you want – the webforms stuff shows a textbox with 50 in it for a couple of milliseconds, so it's worth disabling if you don't want it.
Hope that's helpful!

I would recommend you use only what you need. Build your app in a browser that supports the features you are using, and periodically test in other browsers that you support. If something isn't working correctly, find the appropriate fix, whether it be html5shiv, IE9.js, Modernizr, or CSS3 Pie. You are not going to use all of the new features in HTML5 and CSS3 all in one page, so you don't need to include every polyfill library in existence. Wait until you find problems with the features you're trying to use, then try and find the library necessary to do that.

I've used mainly CSS3Pie...it works great. But this afternoon i tested it on my laptop with I.E8 and there was an problem with it...it was disabling some css lines...when i removed the css3pie code my site gained twice the speed...then i came accross the posts with people arguing about the css3 slowdown...So at the moment i'm busy to find another way for IE7 & IE8 to have border-radius and shades.
If you want to use it...please test alot as it is NON-official fixes

Which is better and why? RaphaelJS or HTML5 Canvas?

I found a vector library on the Internet that even works with IE6!
http://raphaeljs.com/index.html
It's amazing.
Now my question is it better than the upcoming HTML5 <canvas>? The only reason I ask is that it could be years before Microsoft implements a <canvas> that doesn't require a plugin for it to run.
And it will be even longer until all the IE users on the Internet get rid of their old browsers so that we can even justify using the HTML5 <canvas>.
I'm all about sticking to standards, but this one is just going to take too long, thanks to MS's slow development of their browser.
Thoughts?

Raphael is a vector graphics library, done using SVG, whereas HTML5 canvas is bitmap graphics.
If you want to do vector graphics, I think going with Raphael is probably a good choice over "just" canvas. As you say, canvas does not quite work with IE and it will probably be a while before it's natively supported. If Raphael does what you need, there is no particular reason not to use it.
Do note that there are also other libraries for this: Excanvas, which emulates canvas for IE using VML (as far as I know), and also some others which do the same with Silverlight and Flash but I forgot their names.
There's also Dojo, which has a component for abstracting canvas usage behind an easy to use interface, which also supports IE.
Having native canvas in all browsers will not make the libraries obsolete, since the libraries usually abstract some of the canvas complexities away, making the usage easier.

SVGWeb (http://code.google.com/p/svgweb/) by Google is what you want. It makes IE compatible with SVG, which is the standard, and which all other mainstream browsers already support. In other words, as google say, "Using the library plus native SVG support you can instantly target ~95% of the existing installed web base."

And you can use http://code.google.com/p/explorercanvas/ which implements the HTML5 Canvas Standard in IE. All you do is add:
<head>
<!--[if IE]><script src="excanvas.js"></script><![endif]-->
</head>
The difference between Canvas and SVG is explained as follows:
SVG and canvas aren't really
interchangeable technologies. SVG is a
type of retained mode graphics where
everything is drawn from a rather
abstract model (the SVG document).
Canvas on the other hand is a kind of
immediate mode graphics, where there
is no model and the client
(JavaScript) must take care of
redrawing, animations etc.

The answer depends on what you need:
if you need to add event handlers to the graphic objects: you need to use SVG. Else Canvas.
if no events are needed is performance important: if yes then Canvas 5.
Note that IE 9 supports Canvas and offers more HTML 5 support compare to other browsers!