Basically what the title says. Though the spacing needs to be the same on any resoulution. I tried to do it with css but on different resolutions it moves around a bit. It dosn't matter how you do it (javascript, css, html), as long as it works.
You can view the site that im having issues on here.
If the error is the Fatal Error. Check Code. bit at the top, then do this
Change
#newscontent {
top: 4px;
left: 14%;
position: fixed;
}
to
#newscontent {
top: 4px;
left: 18%; //CHANGE HERE
position: fixed;
}
This will keep the text from overlapping the Latest News bit, at least until the page shrinks smaller than the BB.
Even better would be to make #newscontent a span and place it inside the #news div, so there would be no overlapping or separation no matter what the screen size.
only #topbar should be positioned absolute (if needed), child divs can have float left and margin/padding right
OK, so bottom line is you don't want to solve this using absolute or fixed positioning with left-offset percentages. This approach will fail depending on screen resolution and length of text. A better approach is to float the items, which will allow them to "push" the next element to the right, if need be. Try this:
First, remove all your CSS for your #serverstats, #news, and #newscontent selectors.
Second, on all three of those divs, add a menu-item class:
<div id="serverstats" class="menu-item">...</div>
<div id="news" class="menu-item">...</div>
<div id="newscontent" class="menu-item">...</div>
Third, add the following CSS to your style sheet:
.menu-item {
float: left;
font: bold 120% Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
margin-left: 15px;
padding-top: 3px;
text-decoration: none;
}
Related
I'm using this plugin and it works perfectly:
https://codyhouse.co/demo/client-testimonials-carousel/index.html
however I'm not too sure how to get the arrows to stay put and never move. Right now they center themselves based on the height of the div and I just want them to stay where they are instead. If someone could show me what they changed so I can also learn that would be awesome!
You have to change this css:
.flex-direction-nav li a::before, .flex-direction-nav li a::after {
background-color: white;
content: "";
height: 13px;
left: 50%;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
width: 2px;
}
Change the top: 50%; to whatever you want. Like top: 200px for example.
The top: 50% will get the height of the parent element and move the own element 50% down. This can be disabled by adding a fixed declaration.
If you cant edit the css from your plugin, include your own css-file and paste this into it:
.flex-direction-nav li a::before, .flex-direction-nav li a::after {
top: 200px;
}
Consider sticking with the moving arrows. Reason for suggesting this is that your choice of fixed top position is unlikely to be as pleasing as the centred version. Say you choose
top: 100px;
It will look great for a testimonial that generates a 220px high block because the 100px point is roughly central. But it will look ugly when the testimonial block is 130px high and the arrow is close to the bottom of the block.
Your sample testimonials have either 3 or 4 lines only. Try it with single-line testimonial and a 7 line version and see how you feel about fixing the position.
Its a nice looking site so far - good work.
I've written some code where when I click on an image it fades out and fades in a new div which should be vertically aligned. I use the same code as my logo which is originally vertical-align: middle, so I don't see the issue.
The code I'm using currently is this:
position: absolute;
top: 0; right: 0; bottom: 0; left: 0;
margin: auto;
Here is the JSFiddle of a section of my code: http://jsfiddle.net/L79kte39/
Vertical alignments in CSS can be tricky. Here's a good article I go back to when I haven't done it for a while:
http://phrogz.net/css/vertical-align/
Apparently (read: supposedly), CSS has been adopted enough for the following to work fairly universally:
.element {
position: relative;
top: 50%;
transform: translateY(-50%);
}
Source
Here's my version. It uses vertical-align...with a lot of twists. It does not use transform, or any exact pixel widths. It does use one extra container.
The key is this:
.cod-valign:before {
content: '';
display: inline-block;
height: 100%;
vertical-align: middle;
}
which creates an empty inline-block that fakes vertical-align (meant for text-row character placement) into thinking the current line of text contains a 0-character, 100%-tall string, at the center of the div. Then, the next element aligns next to it by also setting vertical-align. (I applied the image the same way)
It's tricky, but probably easier to understand if you remember that vertical-align was first intended for things like aligning large characters in a line of text in the correct way. (ie, if the first letter of a book chapter is large, does the rest of the text go at its top, or its bottom?)
http://jsfiddle.net/7qtLLakq/
#cod-options would need a height to have it centered the way the logo is centered. Try height:200px
Okay I apologize if this is a repeat - but I couldn't find any working answers anywhere.
I want to have two divs (50% width each) side by side... so a left and a right - inside of a content div (see photo below).
I want them to have min-widths at 300px and once the page gets smaller than 600px (which is when both divs will reach their mins) I want to divs to wrap.. so one on top the other.
I've tried to do that here: fiddle but am having problems.
Here is EXACTLY what I want:
You're making things hard for yourself! This can be done quickly and easily with inline-blocks. Have a nice JSfiddle.
Lets explain the code:
.wrapper
{
text-align: center; /* specifies that the inline-blocks (which are treated
like text here) will be centered. */
font-size: 0; /* Explained later */
max-width: 1000px; /* Your desired max-width */
position: relative; /* These two lines center your wrapper in the page. */
margin: 0 auto;
}
Now for the inside 50% elements:
.left, .right{
display: inline-block; /* This will treat these divs like a text element.
This will work with the parent's "text-align: center" to center the element. */
min-width: 300px;
width: 50%;
font-size: 16px; /* Explained below */
vertical-align: text-top; /* Explained below */
}
You might be wondering why font-size is included. It is because with this method comes a little quirk - if a font size is kept at default, the div's will have an annoying gap between them that can not be eliminated with margin.
However, adding font-size: 0; to the parent element eliminates this gap. It's weird, and you then have to specify the font-size for your children elements, but it's well worth it for the ease of use.
But there's still a problem - the blue element is pushed down, and isn't flush on the top. This can be remedied with vertical-align: text-top; This will make sure all Div elements are aligned by the tops, so they lay in a more pleasant pattern. This is just another little quirk to remember when using inline-blocks. I know it seems like a lot of things to fix just for something this simple, but compared to your other options using inline-block is the cleanest and easiest way of going about this. (Though if you prefer, jshanley offers a very good alternative using float elements)
Also, because these children are now treated like text, they will automatically reposition themselves when the window gets too small! No media-queries needed. Yay.
Good luck.
Instead of using inline-block which causes some sizing quirks, you can use block elements, and float both .left and .right to the left, giving each a width of 50%.
Then to make them stack you need to do a little calculating. Since you specified that the wrapper is 80% of the page width, and the break point for the content is at 600px (each element 300px) the page's breakpoint would be at 750px since 80% of 750 is 600.
You can make a media query that will only apply styles when the page width is less than 750px and set .left and .right to width 100% to make them stack.
#media only screen and (max-width: 750px) {
.left, .right {
width: 100%;
}
}
It's very simple to implement, and gives a good result, here's the fiddle.
I think both #jshanley and #emn178's answers do the trick, but I want to point something out:
The display: inline-block; css property doesn't work with float: right nor float: left, since when you use the float property, it ALWAYS automatically set the display property to block.
Since you're doing this:
.right{
min-width:100px;
background-color:purple;
height:100%;
margin-left:50%;
display:inline-block;
}
The display: inline-block; property is doing nothing.
left and right could have same layout, so I add a class block.
To use float:left and width:50%, it should work.
http://jsfiddle.net/emn178/mzbku/7/
I add media query, it should be what you want.
But you need to calculate how to set the size.
I'm having some issues with a webpage of mine, mainly on mobile devices but it also affects desktop devices too, I would be willing to award a bounty (as and when stackoverflow allows me) to whomever can help with these problems
HTML: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=bbFsMcwT
CSS: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=SGMwt3cs
JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/D8SJD/
Issue 1 - Left/Right Scroll Image Buttons
Currently my left and right scroll image buttons are done in html using onmouseover and onmouseout I want to be able to convert them into css based "buttons"
Issue 2 - Dynamic Resolution(s)
The header and footers aren't dynamic with different resolutions for example, I created the page designed on a 1680x1050 monitor which looks like: Desktop 1680x1050 however making the window smaller it looks like: Desktop Small Window
On a Nexus 4 mobile phone on default zoom it looks like: Mobile Original Zoom
On a Nexus 4 mobile phone zoomed out to as far as it can go it looks like: Mobile Max Distance
On a Nexus 4 zoomed out and scrolled to the bottom (so that the browsers URL bar disappears) it looks like: Zoomed out without URL bar (the footer of the actual webpage vanishes)
On a Nexus 4 zoomed out and scrolled just off from the bottom (so that the browsers URL bar is visible) it looks like: Zoomed out with URL bar (the footer returns)
.
The placeholder image and arrows are supposed to be in the center of the footer and headers and should shrink in accordance to the screen resolution.
Mobile device default zoom (if possible) needs to be decreased so they can see more and on getting smaller (if possible) if it gets close to Mobile Original Zoom then the Up to Top, Down to Key, placeholder logos should vanish...
Please see images at bottom of this post
For the mobile devices I tried things like below just for testing but none of them worked...
#media (max-width: 640px) {
#header > a img {
display: none;
}
}
EDIT 14/11/2013 # 01:58GMT
On a 1920x1080 screen it looks kind of okay although there is a big gap between the text and the placeholder image as seen below:
On a 1680x1050 screen it looks roughly how it should take note of where "Semi" is located and compare to the 1920x1080 image from above.
On a 600x600 screen it appears as follows, which as you can see there is a big gap between the placeholder and the left arrow but on the right arrow there is no gap and infact it overflows, as for the text it too is too far to the right.
Type
#media screen and (max-width:640px) {
/* Your specific styles go here */
}
and dont forget to add
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0">
Hope that helps :-)
I see a border around your links, remove from your links:
a{
border:none ;
}
for first issue you can do it with CSS, just remove <img> tag inside <a> tag like this:
<div class="footleft">
<a class="def" href="javascript: void(0);">
</a>
</div>
create image buttons like this:
then set background to <a> tag like this:
#footer .footleft a {
width: 100px;
height: 47px;
display: block;
background: url(path/to/leftarrow.png);
background-position: 0 0;
}
#footer .footright a{
width: 100px;
height: 47px;
display: block;
background: url(path/to/rightarrow.png);
background-position: 0 0;
}
#footer .footleft a:hover , #footer .footright a:hover{
background-position: 0 100%;
}
second issue, I think if you remove position:absolute; from #header .headimage and #footer .footimage it will be okay.
and if your want to centerize headmid and footmid and footmidtwo you have two choices,
First: set fixed width to them and use CSS like this:
#footer .footmid {
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
position: absolute;
font-size: 15px;
width: 292px;
margin-left: -146px;
}
#footer .footmidtwo {
top: 70%;
left: 50%;
position: absolute;
font-size: 15px;
width: 126px;
margin-left: -63px;
}
#header .headmid {
top: 60%;
left: 50%;
position: absolute;
font-size: 15px;
width: 302px;
margin-left: -151px;
}
Second: if you need to have dynamic width you can use this CSS and JQuery:
CSS:
#header .headmid {
top: 60%;
left: 50%;
position: absolute;
font-size: 15px;
}
#footer .footmid {
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
position: absolute;
font-size: 15px;
}
#footer .footmidtwo {
top: 70%;
left: 50%;
position: absolute;
font-size: 15px;
}
JQuery:
var $widthhead = $(".headmid").width();
var $widthfoot = $(".footmid").width();
var $widthfoot2 = $(".footmidtwo").width();
$(".headmid").css("margin-left",$widthhead/2*(-1));
$(".footmid").css("margin-left",$widthfoot/2*(-1));
$(".footmidtwo").css("margin-left",$widthfoot2/2*(-1));
jsFiddle is here
Okay I've tried to filter out all of the irrelevant code for this solution.
See the solution here.
Most of the time, it is best to use relative positioning to fit elements absolutely inside of another element. In your case, with three different strings to fit in a 300x80 window, it's a bit crowded. I tried to place things in a logical position to demonstrate.
By placing a container in the footimage div with relative position, you can then place every element inside the footimage div absolutely relavtive to the footimage div, rather than to the entire page.
For example, what you had:
#footer .footmid
{
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
}
Will place the div of class footmid at a position 50% of the page height from the top of the page and 50% of the page width from the left of the page:
This will work if every user that visits your page has the exact same resolution, however it causes problems when the don't. Obviously, this isn't a perfect world, so different resolutions will visit your page.
What you can do is use relative positioning!
Basically I tell CSS that instead of moving 50% from the top and left of the window, move 50% from the top and left of the nearest parent element with relative positioning:
You can modify the bottom, left, and right attributes of my fiddle to move the footmid elements within the relative element .footimageContainer that is the same size and in the same position as the .footimage.
As far as your arrows, I wasn't quite sure what you were trying to accomplish; your question was pretty vague, so I simply made them fade out slightly when you mouseover them. Any mouseover/out events can be handled using CSS psuedo-elements.
.element //Native and mouseout
{}
.element:hover //onmouseover
{}
Remember that if you use pseudo-elements, you have to specify the attribute that will be changing in both the native and :hover rules.
.element
{color:red;}
.element
{color:black;}
If you have any additional questions on the arrows, let me know and I'll revise my answer.
http://jsfiddle.net/D8SJD/4/
Instead of using absolute positioning, you can just take advantage of the text-align center and images and text will center automatically.
If you want offset from center, try position:relative, and top, left, right etc and it will move relative to it's central position.
Elements that are display:inline; or display:inline-block; will align according to parents text-align property, in this case text-align:center.
#footer .footimage {
display:inline;
position:relative;
top:-10px;
}
#footer .footmid {
top: 50%;
width:100%;
position: absolute;
font-size: 15px;
}
#footer .footmidtwo {
top: 70%;
width:100%;
position: absolute;
font-size: 15px;
}
As per issue 2, i could be wrong but when targeting the image through the structure of the site
i.e.
headImg a img{...}
The style wouldn't work. But if you add classes to the images the style will work; the case could be that there are some unclosed divs or elements messing with the architecture.
<div class="headimage">
<img class="placeholder" src="http://placehold.it/300x80"/>
</div>
#media screen and (max-width: 640px) {
.placeholder {
display: none;
}
}
JsFiddle here - http://jsfiddle.net/Q5bEb/
I have this template and it works fine, but I need to fix that floating menu to the left side of page (not to the left side of browser window). I need to have it stitched when I change resolution or reduce browser window.
I have one idea with two columns with float: left, but there must be a better solution.
Thank you.
You could do the following:
#content {
width: 960px;
margin: 0 230px; //change from auto to a set margin
}
#floatMenu {
position: absolute;
top: 150px;
left: 0%;
margin-left: 200px; //REMOVE this margin altogether
width: 200px;
}
The simplest solution is to move the #floatmenu div inside the #content div. Also you need to manually change the margin-left in the floatingmenu css file to -220px etc. And in addition you would need to change the position attribute on #content div to relative, to make sure the absolutely positioned menu is positioned relative to the #content div's left side.
All in all, drop the floating menu, using JS to add annoying widgets to your website is so 90s. And, well, annoying.