I have to get the number of parenthesized substring matches in a regular expression:
var reg=/([A-Z]+?)(?:[a-z]*)(?:\([1-3]|[7-9]\))*([1-9]+)/g,
nbr=0;
//Some code
alert(nbr); //2
In the above example, the total is 2: only the first and the last couple of parentheses will create grouping matches.
How to know this number for any regular expressions?
My first idea was to check the value of RegExp.$1 to RegExp.$9, but even if there are no corresponding parenthseses, these values are not null, but empty string...
I've also seen the RegExp.lastMatch property, but this one represents only the value of the last matched characters, not the corresponding number.
So, I've tried to build another regular expression to scan any RegExp and count this number, but it's quite difficult...
Do you have a better solution to do that?
Thanks in advance!
Javascripts RegExp.match() method returns an Array of matches. You might just want to check the length of that result array.
var mystr = "Hello 42 world. This 11 is a string 105 with some 2 numbers 55";
var res = mystr.match(/\d+/g);
console.log( res.length );
Well, judging from the code snippet we can assume that the input pattern is always a valid regular expression, because otherwise it would fail before the some code partm right? That makes the task much easier!
Because We just need to count how many starting capturing parentheses there are!
var reg = /([A-Z]+?)(?:[a-z]*)(?:\([1-3]|[7-9]\))*([1-9]+)/g;
var nbr = (' '+reg.source).match(/[^\\](\\\\)*(?=\([^?])/g);
nbr = nbr ? nbr.length : 0;
alert(nbr); // 2
And here is a breakdown:
[^\\] Make sure we don't start the match with an escaping slash.
(\\\\)* And we can have any number of escaped slash before the starting parenthes.
(?= Look ahead. More on this later.
\( The starting parenthes we are looking for.
[^?] Make sure it is not followed by a question mark - which means it is capturing.
) End of look ahead
Why match with look ahead? To check that the parenthes is not an escaped entity, we need to capture what goes before it. No big deal here. We know JS doens't have look behind.
Problem is, if there are two starting parentheses sticking together, then once we capture the first parenthes the second parenthes would have nothing to back it up - its back has already been captured!
So to make sure a parenthes can be the starting base of the next one, we need to exclude it from the match.
And the space added to the source? It is there to be the back of the first character, in case it is a starting parenthes.
Related
Usually in my system i have the following string:
http://localhost/api/module
to find out the last part of the string (which is my route) ive been using the following:
/[^\/]+$/g
However there may be cases where my string looks abit different such as:
http://localhost/api/module/123
Using the above regex it would then return 123. When my String looks like this i know that the last part will always be a number. So my question is how do i make sure that i can always find the last string that does not contain a number?
This is what i came up with which really stricty matches only module for the following lines:
http://localhost/api/module
http://localhost/api/module/123
http://localhost/api/module/123a
http://localhost/api/module/a123
http://localhost/api/module/a123a
http://localhost/api/module/1a3
(?!\w*\d\w*)[^\/][a-zA-Z]+(?=\/\w*\d+\w*|$)
Explanation
I basically just extended your expression with negative lookahead and lookbehind which basically matches your expression given both of the following conditions is true:
(?!\w*\d\w*) May contain letters, but no digits
[a-zA-Z]+ Really, truly only consists of one or more letters (was needed)
(?=\/\d+|$)The match is either followed by a slash, followed by digits or the end of the line
See this in action in my sample at Regex101.
partYouWant = urlString.replace(/^.*\/([a-zA-Z]+)[\/0-9]*$/,'$1')
Here it is in action:
urlString="http://localhost/api/module/123"
urlString.replace(/^.*\/([a-zA-Z]+)[\/0-9]*$/,'$1')
-->"module"
urlString="http://localhost/api/module"
urlString.replace(/^.*\/([a-zA-Z]+)[\/0-9]*$/,'$1')
-->"module"
It just uses a capture expression to find the last non-numeric part.
It's going to do this too, not sure if this is what you want:
urlString="http://localhost/api/module/123/456"
urlString.replace(/^.*\/([a-zA-Z]+)[\/0-9]*$/,'$1')
-->"module"
/([0-9])\w+/g
That would select the numbers. You could use it remove that part from the url. What language are you using it for ?
I want to find strings that contain words in a particular order, allowing non-standard characters in between the words but excluding a particular word or symbol.
I'm using javascript's replace function to find all instances and put into an array.
So, I want select...from, with anything except 'from' in between the words. Or I can separate select...from from select...from (, as long as I exclude nesting. I think the answer is the same for both, i.e. how do I write: find x and not y within the same regexp?
From the internet, I feel this should work: /\bselect\b^(?!from).*\bfrom\b/gi but this finds no matches.
This works to find all select...from: /\bselect\b[0-9a-zA-Z#\(\)\[\]\s\.\*,%_+-]*?\bfrom\b/gi but modifying it to exclude the parenthesis "(" at the end prevents any matches: /\bselect\b[0-9a-zA-Z#\(\)\[\]\s\.\*,%_+-]*?\bfrom\b\s*^\(/gi
Can anyone tell me how to exclude words and symbols within this regexp?
Many thanks
Emma
Edit: partial string input:
left outer join [stage].[db].[table14] o on p.Project_id = o.project_id
left outer join
(
select
different_id
,sum(costs) - ( sum(brushes) + sum(carpets) + sum(fabric) + sum(other) + sum(chairs)+ sum(apples) ) as overallNumber
from
(
select ace from [stage].db.[table18] J
Javascript:
sequel = stringInputAsAbove;
var tst = sequel.replace(/\bselect\b[\s\S]*?\bfrom\b/gi, function(a,b) { console.log('match: '+a); selects.push(b); return a; });
console.log(selects);
Console.log(selects) should print an array of numbers, where each number is the starting character of a select...from. This works for the second regexp I gave in my info, printing: [95, 251]. Your \s\S variation does the same, #stribizhev.
The first example ^(?!from).* should do likewise but returns [].
The third example \s*^\( should return 251 only but returns []. However I have just noticed that the positive expression \s*\( does give 95, so some progress! It's the negatives I'm getting wrong.
Your \bselect\b^(?!from).*\bfrom\b regex doesn't work as expected because:
^ means here beginning of a line, not negation of next part, so
the \bselect\b^ means, select word followed by beginning of a
line. After removal of ^ regex start to match something
(DEMO) but it is still invalid.
in multiline text .* without modification will not match new line,
so regex will match only select...from in single lines, but if you
change it for (.|\n)* (as a simple example) it will match
multiline, but still invalid
the * is greede quantifire, so it will match as much a possible,
but if you use reluctant quantifire *?, regex will match to first
occurance of from word, and int will start to return relativly
correct result.
\bselect\b(?!from) means match separate select word which is not
directly followed by separate from word, so it would be
selectfrom somehow composed of separate words (because
select\bfrom) so (?!from) doesn't work and it is redundant
In effect you will get regex very similar to what Stribizhev gave you: \bselect\b(.|\n)*?\bfrom\b
In third expression you meke same mistake: \bselect\b[0-9a-zA-Z#\(\)\[\]\s\.\*,%_+-]*?\bfrom\b\s*^\( using ^ as (I assume) a negation, not beginning of a line. Remove ^ and you will again get relativly valid result (match from select through from to closing parathesis ) ).
Your second regex works similar to \bselect\b(.|\n)*?\bfrom\b or \bselect\b[\s\S]*?\bfrom\b.
I wrote "relativly valid result", as I also think, that parsing SQL with regex could be very camplicated, so I am not sure if it will work in every case.
You can also try to use positive lookahead to match just position in text, like:
(?=\bselect\b(?:.|\n)*?\bfrom\b)
DEMO - the () was added to regex just to return beginning index of match in groups, so it would be easier to check it validity
Negation in regex
We use ^ as negation in character class, for example [^a-z] means match anything but not letter, so it will match number, symbol, whitespace, etc, but not letter from range a to z (Look here). But this negation is on a level of single character. I you use [^from] it will prevent regex from matching characters f,r,o and m (demo). Also the [^from]{4} will avoid matching from but also form, morf, etc.
To exlude the whole word from matching by regex, you need to use negative look ahead, like (?!from), which will fail to match, if there will be chosen word from fallowing given position. To avoid matching whole line containing from you could use ^(?!.*from.*).+$ (demo).
However in your case, you don't need to use this construction, because if you replace greedy quantifire .*\bfrom with .*?\bfrom it will match to first occurance of this word. Whats more it would couse problems. Take a look on this regex, it will not match anything because (?![\s\S]*from[\s\S]*) is not restricted by anything, so it will match only if there is no from after select, but we want to match also from! in effect this regex try to match and exclude from at once, and fail. so the (?!.*word.*) construction works much better to exclude matching line with given word.
So what to do if we don't what to match a word in a fragment of a match? I think select\b([^f]|f(?!rom))*?\bfrom\b is a good solution. With ([^f]|f(?!rom))*? it will match everything between select and from, but will not exclude from.
But if you would like to match only select...from not followed by ( then it is good idea to use (?!\() like. But in your regex (multiline, use of (.|\n)*? or [\s\S]*? it will cause to match up to next select...from part, because reluctant quantifire will chenge a plece where it need to match to make whole regex . In my opinion, good solution would be to use again:
select\b([^f]|f(?!rom))*?\bfrom\b(?!\s*?\()
which will not overlap additional select..from and will not match if there is \( after select...from - check it here
I am having trouble making zero or one '?' give preference to one occurrence over zero, in javascript.
Ex. This is my regex: (=1)?
This is my string, str: abcd=1
when i do regex.exec(str) I get the following returned: ["",undefined]. It looks like it's choosing the zero length match in the beginning of my string. Is there a way to get it to choose '=1'? Possibly this may work differently in other languages but I'm currently using javascript, and this seems to be the case.
The expression (=1)? will give precedence to one occurrence over zero, but the regular expression engine will always attempt to match as early in the string as possible. So starting at the first character in the string, first it will try to match =1 and fail, and then because of the ? it will match the empty string.
I think the following expression is most similar to what your intention is:
(?:.*(=1))?
This will put =1 into the first capture group if it is anywhere in the string, but every string will still be matched because of the ? making the non-capturing group optional.
By defaut ? is greedy in javascript. Your problem is somewhere else.
aside note: to have ? lazy you must write ?? (like other quantifiers)
(=1)* will match =1=1=1=1=1=1=1=1
If you're looking to match all digits after the = then use
abcde=(\d+)
This will place all the digits into capture group 1.
Not a big user of RegEx - never really understood them! However, I feel the best way to check input for a username field would be with one that only allows Letters (upper or lower), numbers and the _ character, and must start with a letter as per the site policy. The My RegEx and code is as such:
var theCheck = /[a-zA-Z]|\d|_$/g;
alert(theCheck.test(theUsername));
Despite trying with various combinations, everything is returning "true".
Can anyone help?
Your regex is saying "does theUsername contain a letter, digit, or end with underscore".
Try this instead:
var theCheck = /^[a-z]([a-z_\d]*)$/i; // the "i" is "ignore case"
This says "theUsername starts with a letter and only contains letters, digits, or underscores".
Note: I don't think you need the "g" here, that means "all matches". We just want to test the whole string.
How about something like this:
^([a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_]{3,})$
To explain the entire pattern:
^ = Makes sure that the first pattern in brackets is at the beginning
() = puts the entire pattern in a group in case you need to pull it out and not just validate
a-zA-Z0-9_ = matches your character allowances
$ = Makes sure that this must be the entire line
{3,} = Makes sure there are a minimum of 3 characters.
You can add a number after the comma for a character limit max
You could also use a +, which would merely enforce at least one character match the second pattern. A * would not enforce any lengths
Use this as your regex:
^[A-Za-z][a-zA-Z0-9_]*$
I need a form with one button and window for input
that will check an array, via a regular expression.
And will find a exact match of letters + numbers. Example wxyz [some space btw] 0960000
or a mix of numbers and letters [some space btw] + numbers 01xg [some space btw] 0960000
The array has four objects for now.
Once found i need a function the will open a new page or window when match is found .
Thanks you for your help.
Michael
To answer the Javascript part, here's one way to "grep" through the array to find matching elements:
var matches = [];
var re = /whatever/;
foo.forEach(
function(el) {
if( re.exec(el) )
matches.push(el);
}
);
To attempt to answer the regular expression part: I don't know what "exact match" means to you, and I'm assuming "some space" belongs only in between the other terms, and I'm assuming letters means the English alphabet from 'a' to 'z' in lower and upper case and the digits should be 0-9 (otherwise, other language characters might be matched).
The first pattern would be /[a-zA-Z0-9]+\s*0960000/. Change "\s*" to "\s+" if there is at least one space, instead of zero or more space characters. Change "\s" to " " if matching the tab character (and some lesser-used space chars) is not desirable.
For the second pattern, I don't know what "numbers 01xg" means, but if it means numbers followed by that string, then the pattern would be /[a-zA-Z0-9]+\s*[0-9]+\s*01xg\s*0960000/. The same caveats apply as above.
Additionally, this will match a partial string. If the string much be matched in entirety (if nothing in the string must exist except that which is matched), add "^" to the beginning of the pattern to anchor it to the beginning of the string, and "$" at the end to anchor it to the end of the string. For example, /[a-zA-Z0-9]+\s*0960000/ matches "foo_bar 5 0960000", but /^[a-zA-Z0-9]+\s*0960000$/ does not.
For more on regular expressions in Javascript, take a look at developer.mozilla.org's article on the RegExp object (the link takes you to JS version 1.5 reference, which should apply to all JS-capable browsers).
(edited to add): To match either situation, since they have overlapping parts, you could use the following pattern: /[a-zA-Z0-9]+(?:\s*[0-9]+\s*01xg)?\s*0960000/. The question mark says to match the part that differs -- in a non-matching group (?:foo) -- once or zero times. (?:foo)? and (?:foo|) do the same thing in this case, but I'm not sure whether there is a performance difference; I would recommend to use the one that makes the most sense to you, so you can read it later.