I have a problem with my code, some code does not work when I call recursive call of same function inside it. It has to be something with myGalleria = Galleria.get(0);, but I have no idea how to make it all work.
Document Ready (just to show when I call function for the first time, everything works fine for first time)
$(document).ready(function(){
$.getJSON('getImages.php', {
cat: "123"
}, function(imgData){
createGallery(imgData);
});
});
Now function itself, note that when I click on .galleria-menuButtons span that calls same function nothing is working, well galleria itself is creating, but nothing else.
function createGallery(imgData){
$("#gallery").galleria({
image_margin: 30,
clicknext: true,
transition: "fade",
dataSource: imgData
});
myGalleria = Galleria.get(0); // I don't think this works after recursive call
// Adding menu and menu buttons
myGalleria.addElement("menu").appendChild("container", "menu");
myGalleria.addElement("menuButtons").appendChild("menu", "menuButtons");
$.ajax({
url: "menuButtons.php",
success: function(data){
myGalleria.$("menuButtons").html(data);
}
});
// Menu button click events
$('.galleria-menuButtons span').live('click', function(){
alert(this.id);
// Getting jSon data
$.getJSON('getImages.php', {
cat: this.id
}, function(imgData) {
alert(imgData);
createGallery(imgData); // <- Recursive call
});
});
}
I have similar function on window.resize and it also does not work after recursive call.
$(window).resize(function(){
$(".galleria-container").css("width", $(window).width());
$(".galleria-container").css("height", $(window).height());
galleriaRescale = Galleria.get(0);
galleriaRescale.rescale(); // <- this is not working either
//sizeBG();
});
FYI - this isn't actually recursion in the traditional sense because you're calling createGallery from a click handler which launches a JSON request which then calls createGallery when that succeeds, both of which will occur after the previous call to createGallery finishes.
But you do have surviving function closures which could be confusing things or causing problems. One guess is that you may want to make sure that things you expect to be local variables (like myGalleria have a var in front of them so they really are local variables and not variables that might be scoped to a higher level and be influenced by a previous incarnation of this call or be influencing an earlier call that hasn't yet completed.
var myGalleria = Galleria.get(0);
Then, assuming imgData is some sort of data structure like an array or object, you have to make sure that there's either only one global version of that data structure that never changes or that each call of createGallery has the appropriate separate copy of that data structure. If it's getting changed along the way, then subsequent calls to createGallery may not be getting the data they want. If it's a read-only data structure (you don't change it), then you're probably OK on that one.
OK, let's talk through the pseudo code for what this does.
On page ready, you get some JSON image data.
When that succeeds, you call createGallery with that image data.
The createGallery call does some sort of operation in the DOM (perhaps an animation)
It then calls: myGalleria = Galleria.get(0); Because there is no var in front of myGalleria, this is a global variable declaration (bad news for recursion and closures)
You then use the myGalleria data structure to make some changes to the DOM (adding menus and menu items).
You then add a .live click handler on a pretty generic set of CSS classes (it's possible you have added this click handler more than once here).
You then fetch some JSON image data again.
When that image data is fetched, you start the whole process over again by called createGallery.
Summary
The two potential problems I see are that myGalleria is not a local variable and probably should be and you may be adding duplicate click handlers.
If neither of these fully solve the issue, then we probably need more information about what Galleria.get(0) is doing.
FYI, the resize clickHandler looks like it may have the same issue with not using var to make your variable declaration a local variable.
Round 2
OK, here are some more observations.
When you add the menu and menu buttons with this block of code, you aren't providing any unique identifiers to either the addElement or appendChild functions (you're providing "menu" and "menuButtons" to both). As such, I don't know how you can uniquely hook up to them in the subsequent click event. As far as your code looks, all the menu items look identical and none have unique state. I don't know the Galleria code, but I assume somebody has to make unique identifiers for these new items so that you can uniquely identify them in your subsequent click handler.
// Adding menu and menu buttons
myGalleria.addElement("menu").appendChild("container", "menu");
myGalleria.addElement("menuButtons").appendChild("menu", "menuButtons");
When you set up a click handler to presumably handle the clicks for just these menu items, you are using the exact same CSS selector every time so there's no way that this click handler is going to be uniquely assigned to just the newly create menu items (which is what I assume you want). I don't know the Galleria code, but I assume that you should create some sort of unique ID that you pass into addElement and appendChild for the newly created menu items and then reference that unique identifier when you install the click handler. Likewise, this function needs to uniquely target just the menu buttons you created by using unique identifiers myGalleria.$("menuButtons").html(data);
Lastly, I'd suggest you change the name of one of your variables just to avoid confusion. In your click handler, change the three occurrences of imgData to just data so there can be no confusion about closures and the value of imgData.
Round 3
Ultimately one of the fixes was this (embedded in the comments):
I think it might work if you just only install the .live click handler once outside the createGallery function rather than call it each time. Since it's .live it will automatically work for all future buttons you create so you should only call it once. I'd suggest putting it in the $(document).ready function block.
Related
I have a function that builds my d3 display, within it is a function called update() which actually deals with the nodes.
The function can be seen here
As you can see, the svg tree is created and then the update() function is run, displaying the tree nodes.
When a tree node with a certain data attribute is clicked, an html form is appended to the screen which allows a user to add data relating to that node. The user enters the data, clicks 'save' which has a jQuery based event handler attached which updates the data source.
I need to then trigger the tree to update with the node showing the new data.
I'm unsure how to trigger this update() function from an external function. I don't want to have to rebuild the entire tree every time, just redraw the nodes to show the new data.
Where is the gap in my understanding of how to do this?
This seems to be more of a JavaScript scope issue. Is tree_data already exposed to other functions (e.g. in the jQuery event handler, can you console.log(tree_data)? If so, then we just need an external reference to update.
A quick way is to assign it to the global window scope:
window.update = function(source) { ...
Of course this isn's not optimal, but it does help us narrow down your issue.
If that works, then we just need to declare a variable outside the scope of your build: function(tree_data) and then inside, on line 65, assign it to update:
var externalReferenceToUpdate;
[...]
build: function(tree_data) {
[...]
var update = function(source) {
[...]
};
externalReferenceToUpdate = update;
update(root); // moved this due to function expression vs. declaration
[...]
}
As you noticed, we had to move update(root). This is because we've "made" the function using a different method. There's a whole other Stack Overflow discussion on the ways to declare functions and their scope issues. Essentially with the second way (var name = function()), the function is not "hoisted" to the top of its scope, so we had to call update after we assigned it to a variable.
Hope this helps!
PS In that other discussion, skim over the first answer and actually focus on the second answer by Eugene.
I came across a peculiar issue when trying to make an ajax call and isolate the actions of the function to itself. Here is the code snippet
$(document).on('click', 'input.action', function(event) {
var self = this;
$.ajax({
url:'http://date.jsontest.com/',
method:'GET',
cache:false,
dataType:'json',
success:self.process,
error:function(){self.process(false);}
});
self.process = function(data) {
if (data) {
alert(data.time);
}
else {
alert("Operation Failed!");
}
}
});
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.0/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div class="container">
<input type="button" value="Get Time" class="action"/>
</div>
Let me briefly explain what I am trying to do, on click of the button, I wish to receive some data from the server and display the data. I am using a process function to process the received data. In case of an error I reuse the process function in a different way to display the error message. I simply use the self variable to contain all the elements within the parent function. I fully understand the following:
What I know
I do not have to use the self to contain the process function because another method will not have access to it
Because the process method in the snippet above is declared after the ajax call for the program as far as it is concerned the process function is undefined.
I clearly know how to fix it.
Experiment:
Click on the Get Time button
Wait for as long as you want but see no result, which is expected because of the process function is declared after the ajax call
Click on the Get Time button again
It works now! Some time (which is probably not your time :P) is displayed now!!
What I wish to know:
What just happened? why does it work the second time and everytime after? Remember this only works for ajax calls, if it were the case that the assignment is retained in the function after calling it once, then this should work in every situation but it does not. Here is an experiment to show that it does not work the same way when ajax calls are not used: Fiddle - Experiment
The Solution:
I am adding a sample solution based on #Felix Kling's answer below. In the Sample Solution, there are two buttons Get Time and Get Date. I've attached the parameter to retrieve time in case of Get Time and date in the case of Get Date to the object self and it is interesting that once I click on Get Time nothing happens just like before but if I click on either Get Time or Get Date the second time only time is displayed.
What just happened?
In a simplified way, this:
var process;
// First click
ajaxCall(process); // process is still undefined
process = function() { ... };
// second click
ajaxCall(process); // process is defined
process = function() { ... };
The assignment to self.process "persists" between events because self refers to the same element.
Here is an experiment to show that it does not work the same way when ajax calls are not used: ...
It doesn't work in your fiddle because of one big difference: you are trying to execute process immediately. But it doesn't exist, so an error is thrown. At this point the script terminates and won't execute the rest of the function, where the function definition takes place.
In your example here, the execution of process is delayed. The script "doesn't know" that there is no function to call until the response was received.
There is nothing "special" going on here. Yes, accepted that the first time it returns undefined as it is yet to be defined.
But, you're attaching the function to the same element input.action. So, the next time, when you click the button, this already has the process method attached to it, so gets called when clicked again.
Try adding one more button with same class and click each once. Now though you've clicked the first button, clicking the second button will still not create an alert as it has not yet had the process function attached to it.
I'm displaying a series of images in a loop, and I'm trying to implement some sort of nudity filter so I'm using nude.js, a library that can somewhat detect nudity. Here's the code:
// we're inside a loop
$(".images").prepend($("<img>").attr({src: whatever, id: uniqueid}).load(function(e) {
nude.load(e.target.id);
nude.scan(function(result) { if (!result) $(e.target).detach(); });
});
However, it detaches all of the wrong images because nude.js is slow and it completes after the loop has gone on to the later iterations, detaching those images instead of the one it was working on.
I've tried using a function factory:
function generateCallback(arg) {
return function(result) { if (!result) $(arg).detach(); };
}
and
nude.scan( generateCallback(e.target) )
but the same thing happens.
What I want is a load event that will remove the image if it seems to contain nudity. How can I do this properly?
EDIT: nude.js works like this:
nude.load(imageid);
nude.scan(callback); // it'll pass true or false into the callback
another edit: accidentally omitted the id setting from the code I posted, but it was there in my real code, so I added it here.
I suspect the case here is that this kind of sequential processing won't work with nude.js.
Looking at the nude.js code, I think your problem is occurring in the call to nude.scan. nude.js has a variable that stores the function to invoke after the scan has completed. When calling nude.scan(callback), this variable is set to be callback.
From your PasteBin, it seems as though the callback gets assigned as expected on the first call, but on the second and subsequent calls, it gets replaced, hence why the second image is detached and not the first.
What happends to your script, is that the e var is global to the function and so after each loop it gets replaced with the new one. So when the first image is scanned, e already became the event of the second image, which get detached.
To solve your problem, use closures. If you want to know more about closures, have a look here.
Otherway, here's the solution to your problem :
$(".images").prepend($("<img>").attr({src: whatever, id: uniqueid}).load(function(e) {
(function(e) {
nude.load(e.target.id);
nude.scan(function(result) { if (!result) $(e.target).detach(); });
}) (e);
});
EDIT: AS nick_w said, there is var that contains the callback and probably gets replaced each time so this is why it isn't the right picture getting detached. You will probably have to modify the script yourself
I am learning javascript, and am trying to adjust the following:
$('#myform').change(function() {
if ($('#sv_I4b').attr('checked')||$('#sv_I4c').attr('checked')){
$('#sv_I5').removeClass('hidden');
} else {
$('#sv_I5').addClass('hidden');
}
});
To be a a function with a name that I can call on different events, such as page load etc.
I don't yet fully understand each element, but I know that:
if ($('#sv_I4b').attr('checked')||$('#sv_I4c').attr('checked')){
$('#sv_I5').removeClass('hidden');
} else {
$('#sv_I5').addClass('hidden');
}
is the core "logic" of the function: if (condition) {then this} else {that}
and more or less understand what is happening there. Which leaves the bounding javascript (is there better terminology than that?):
$('#myform').change(function() {...});
My Questions (are the following true etc):
The dollar I think denotes that it is jQuery
The id my form obviously
pertains the script to events within that form (namespace?)
.change seems to be, a trigger that listens to ... any change taking place
within #myform? so every time a change happens within #myform this
runs? That seems inefficient
function() I don't yet understand what
an anonymous or empty function does, just defines what is contained
in {} as a function?
My goal: to be able to have something like
function myfunction()
{
if ($('#sv_I4b').attr('checked')||$('#sv_I4c').attr('checked')){
$('#sv_I5').removeClass('hidden');
} else {
$('#sv_I5').addClass('hidden');
}
}
and then
$(function() {myfunction});
so I can call that function on page load, but I don't wan't to loose the functionality the .change syntax is providing me (that it changes as the user interacts with the elements on the page also.
Apologies for the general and cumbersome levels of ignorance
You guessed how to define the function correctly — that is,
function myfunction()
{
if ($('#sv_I4b').attr('checked')||$('#sv_I4c').attr('checked')){
$('#sv_I5').removeClass('hidden');
} else {
$('#sv_I5').addClass('hidden');
}
}
works just fine. However, this:
$(function() {myfunction});
Should be written as:
$(myfunction); // Run on page load.
$('#myform').change(myfunction); // ...and also run it when the form changes.
However, that second line won't actually work until the page has loaded unless the form exists at the time the script runs, so you may want to change it to this:
$(function() { // On page load, run this anonymous function:
myfunction(); // Run the function now (where now, at this point, is page load).
$('#myform').change(myfunction); // ...as well as when the form changes.
});
$ is shorthand notation for jQuery, and essentially namespaces any functions to the jQuery framework.
my_form is a DOM selector. $('#my_form') wraps the matched DOM element up as a jQuery object, adding all sorts of useful methods and properties.
.change() is an event listener which, as you guessed, watches for change events on that jQuery object. It is a little inefficient - take a look .on() instead.
the most useful behaviour an anonymous function (closure) is to create private scope, something that javascript doesn't otherwise provide.
I'm developing a small plugin that changes the favicons if there are unread messages in mailbox in Roundcubemail. However, the API sucks, and the event listupdate is fired only when the whole page is loaded, even if it is meant to fire when the list is updated.
However, I've managed to find out, that every time the list is updated, certain functions are called, such as set_unread_count. It gets the unread-count easily, so it would be great to somehow "append" stuff to this function. I just think based on hours of searching that there is no solution for this. Can I add a callback to be called when the set_unread_count is called? Can I somehow append stuff to that function? Any other ideas?
Create a little hook.
var _old_set_unread_count = set_unread_count;
set_unread_count = function() {
// do whatever you want here
// access arguments[x] to get arguments.
_old_set_unread_count.apply(this, arguments);
};
Demo: http://www.jsfiddle.net/4yUqL/69/