I just can't get this thing to work in javascript. So, I have a text "game_1" without the quotes and now i want to get that number out of it and I tried this:
var idText = "game_1";
re = /game_(.*?)/;
found = idText.match(re);
var ajdi = found[1];
alert( ajdi );
But it doesn't work - please point out where am I going wrong.
If you're only matching a number, you may want to try
/game_([0-9]+)/
as your regular expression. That will match at least one number, which seems to be what you need. You entered a regexp that allows for 0 characters (*) and let it select the shortest possible result (?), which may be a problem (and match you 0 characters), depending on the regex engine.
If this is the complete text, then there is no need for regular expressions:
var id = +str.split('_')[1];
or
var id = +str.replace('game_', '');
(unary + is to convert the string to a number)
If you insist on regular expression, you have to anchor the expression:
/^game_(.*?)$/
or make the * greedy by omitting the ?:
/game_(.*)/
Better is to make the expression more restrictive as #Naltharial suggested.
Simple string manipulation:
var idText = "game_1",
adji = parseInt(idText.substring(5), 10);
* means zero or more occurrences. It seems that combining it with a greediness controller ? results in zero match.
You could replace * with + (which means one or more occurrences), but as #Felix Kling notes, it would only match one digit.
Better to ditch the ? completely.
http://jsfiddle.net/G8Qt7/2/
Try "game_1".replace(/^(game_)/, '')
this will return the number
You can simply use this re /\d+/ to get any number inside your string
Related
Let's say I have a string: "We.need..to...split.asap". What I would like to do is to split the string by the delimiter ., but I only wish to split by the first . and include any recurring .s in the succeeding token.
Expected output:
["We", "need", ".to", "..split", "asap"]
In other languages, I know that this is possible with a look-behind /(?<!\.)\./ but Javascript unfortunately does not support such a feature.
I am curious to see your answers to this question. Perhaps there is a clever use of look-aheads that presently evades me?
I was considering reversing the string, then re-reversing the tokens, but that seems like too much work for what I am after... plus controversy: How do you reverse a string in place in JavaScript?
Thanks for the help!
Here's a variation of the answer by guest271314 that handles more than two consecutive delimiters:
var text = "We.need.to...split.asap";
var re = /(\.*[^.]+)\./;
var items = text.split(re).filter(function(val) { return val.length > 0; });
It uses the detail that if the split expression includes a capture group, the captured items are included in the returned array. These capture groups are actually the only thing we are interested in; the tokens are all empty strings, which we filter out.
EDIT: Unfortunately there's perhaps one slight bug with this. If the text to be split starts with a delimiter, that will be included in the first token. If that's an issue, it can be remedied with:
var re = /(?:^|(\.*[^.]+))\./;
var items = text.split(re).filter(function(val) { return !!val; });
(I think this regex is ugly and would welcome an improvement.)
You can do this without any lookaheads:
var subject = "We.need.to....split.asap";
var regex = /\.?(\.*[^.]+)/g;
var matches, output = [];
while(matches = regex.exec(subject)) {
output.push(matches[1]);
}
document.write(JSON.stringify(output));
It seemed like it'd work in one line, as it did on https://regex101.com/r/cO1dP3/1, but had to be expanded in the code above because the /g option by default prevents capturing groups from returning with .match (i.e. the correct data was in the capturing groups, but we couldn't immediately access them without doing the above).
See: JavaScript Regex Global Match Groups
An alternative solution with the original one liner (plus one line) is:
document.write(JSON.stringify(
"We.need.to....split.asap".match(/\.?(\.*[^.]+)/g)
.map(function(s) { return s.replace(/^\./, ''); })
));
Take your pick!
Note: This answer can't handle more than 2 consecutive delimiters, since it was written according to the example in the revision 1 of the question, which was not very clear about such cases.
var text = "We.need.to..split.asap";
// split "." if followed by "."
var res = text.split(/\.(?=\.)/).map(function(val, key) {
// if `val[0]` does not begin with "." split "."
// else split "." if not followed by "."
return val[0] !== "." ? val.split(/\./) : val.split(/\.(?!.*\.)/)
});
// concat arrays `res[0]` , `res[1]`
res = res[0].concat(res[1]);
document.write(JSON.stringify(res));
I have a string that can be a comma separated list of \w, such as:
abc123
abc123,def456,ghi789
I am trying to find a JavaScript regexp that will return ['abc123'] (first case) or ['abc123', 'def456', 'ghi789'] (without the comma).
I tried:
^(\w+,?)+$ -- Nope, as only the last repeating pattern will be matched, 789
^(?:(\w+),?)+$ -- Same story. I am using non-capturing bracket. However, the capturing just doesn't seem to happen for the repeated word
Is what I am trying to do even possible with regexp? I tried pretty much every combination of grouping, using capturing and non-capturing brackets, and still not managed to get this happening...
If you want to discard the whole input when there is something wrong, the simplest way is to validate, then split:
if (/^\w+(,\w+)*$/.test(input)) {
var values = input.split(',');
// Process the values here
}
If you want to allow empty value, change \w+ to \w*.
Trying to match and validate at the same time with single regex requires emulation of \G feature, which assert the position of the last match. Why is \G required? Since it prevents the engine from retrying the match at the next position and bypass your validation. Remember than ECMA Script regex doesn't have look-behind, so you can't differentiate between the position of an invalid character and the character(s) after it:
something,=bad,orisit,cor&rupt
^^ ^^
When you can't differentiate between the 2 positions, you can't rely on the engine to do a match-all operation alone. While it is possible to use a while loop with RegExp.exec and assert the position of last match yourself, why would you do so when there is a cleaner option?
If you want to savage whatever available, torazaburo's answer is a viable option.
Live demo
Try this regex :
'/([^,]+)/'
Alternatively, strings in javascript have a split method that can split a string based on a delimeter:
s.split(',')
Split on the comma first, then filter out results that do not match:
str.split(',').filter(function(s) { return /^\w+$/.test(s); })
This regex pattern separates numerical value in new line which contains special character such as .,,,# and so on.
var val = [1234,1213.1212, 1.3, 1.4]
var re = /[0-9]*[0-9]/gi;
var str = "abc123,def456, asda12, 1a2ass, yy8,ghi789";
var re = /[a-z]{3}\d{3}/g;
var list = str.match(re);
document.write("<BR> list.length: " + list.length);
for(var i=0; i < list.length; i++) {
document.write("<BR>list(" + i + "): " + list[i]);
}
This will get only "abc123" code style in the list and nothing else.
May be you can use split function
var st = "abc123,def456,ghi789";
var res = st.split(',');
Hopefully a simple one!
I've been trying to get this to work for several hours now but am having no luck, as I'm fairly new to regexp I may be missing something very obvious here and was hoping someone could point me in the right direction. The pattern I want to match is as follows: -
At least 1 or more numbers + "##" + at least 1 or more numbers + "##" + at least 1 or more numbers
so a few examples of valid combinations would be: -
1##2##3
123#123#123
0##0##0
A few invalid combinations would be
a##b##c
1## ##1
I've got the following regexp like so: -
[\d+]/#/#[\d+]/#/#[\d+]
And am using it like so (note the double slashes as its inside a string): -
var patt = new RegExp("[\\d+]/#/#[\\d+]/#/#[\\d+]");
if(newFieldValue!=patt){newFieldValue=="no match"}
I also tried these but still nothing: -
if(!patt.text(newFieldValue)){newFieldValue==""}
if(patt.text(newFieldValue)){}else{newFieldValue==""}
But nothing I try is matching, where am I going wrong here?
Any pointers gratefully received, cheers!
1) I can't see any reason to use the RegExp constructor over a RegExp literal for your case. (The former is used primarily where the pattern needs to by dynamic, i.e. is contributed to by variables.)
2) You don't need a character class if there's only one type of character in it (so \d+ not [\d+]
3) You are not actually checking the pattern against the input. You don't apply RegEx by creating an instance of it and using ==; you need to use test() or match() to see if a match is made (the former if you want to check only, not capture)
4) You have == where you mean to assign (=)
if (!/\d+##\d+##\d+/.test(newFieldValue)) newFieldValue = "no match";
You put + inside the brackets, so you're matching a single character that's either a digit or +, not a sequence of digits. I also don't understand why you have / before each #, your description doesn't mention anything about this character.
Use:
var patt = /\d+##\d+##\d+/;
You should use the test method of the pat regex
if (!patt.test(newFieldValue)){ newFieldValue=="no match"; }
once you have a valid regular expression.
Try this regex :
^(?:\d+##){2}\d+$
Demo: http://regex101.com/r/mE8aG7
With the following regex
[\d+]/#/#[\d+]/#/#[\d+]
You would only match things like:
+/#/#5/#/#+
+/#/#+/#/#+
0/#/#0/#/#0
because the regex engine sees it like on the schema below:
Something like:
((-\s)?\d+##)+\d+
I'm sorry if it is a confusing question. I was trying to find a way to do this but couldn't find it so, if it is a repeated question, my apologies!
I have a text something like this: something:"askjnqwe234"
I want to be able to get askjnqwe234 using a RegExp. You can notice I want to omit the quotes. I was trying this using /[^"]+(?=(" ")|"$)/g but it returns an array. I want a RegExt to return a single string, not an array.
I don't know if it's possible but I do not want to specify the position of the array; something like this:
var x = string.match(/[^"]+(?=(" ")|"$)/g)[0];
Thanks!
Try:
/"([^"]*)"/g
in English: look for " the match and record anything that isn't " till you see another "".
match and exec always return an array or null, so, assuming you have a single double-quoted value and no newlines in the string, you could use
var x;
var str = 'something:"askjnqwe234"';
x = str.replace( /^[^"]*"|".*/g, '' );
// "askjnqwe234"
Or, if you may have other quoted values in the string
x = str.replace( /.*?something:"([^"]*)".*/, '$1' );
where $1 refers to the substring captured by the sub-pattern [^"]* between the ().
Further explanation on request.
Notwithstanding the above, I recommend that you tolerate the array indexing and just use match.
You can capture the information inside quotes like this, assuming it matches:
var x = string.match(/something:"([^"]*)"/)[1];
The memory capture at index 1 is the part inside the double quotes.
If you're not sure it will match:
var match = string.match(/something:"([^"]*)"/);
if (match) {
// use match[1] here
}
My problem start with like-
var str='0|31|2|03|.....|4|2007'
str=str.replace(/[^|]\d*[^|]/,'5');
so the output becomes like:"0|5|2|03|....|4|2007" so it replaces 31->5
But this doesn't work for replacing other segments when i change code like this:
str=str.replace(/[^|]{2}\d*[^|]/,'6');
doesn't change 2->6.
What actually i am missing here.Any help?
I think a regular expression is a bad solution for that problem. I'd rather do something like this:
var str = '0|31|2|03|4|2007';
var segments = str.split("|");
segments[1] = "35";
segments[2] = "123";
Can't think of a good way to solve this with a regexp.
Here is a specific regex solution which replaces the number following the first | pipe symbol with the number 5:
var re = /^((?:\d+\|){1})\d+/;
return text.replace(re, '$15');
If you want to replace the digits following the third |, simply change the {1} portion of the regex to {3}
Here is a generalized function that will replace any given number slot (zero-based index), with a specified new number:
function replaceNthNumber(text, n, newnum) {
var re = new RegExp("^((?:\\d+\\|){"+ n +'})\\d+');
return text.replace(re, '$1'+ newnum);
}
Firstly, you don't have to escape | in the character set, because it doesn't have any special meaning in character sets.
Secondly, you don't put quantifiers in character sets.
And finally, to create a global matching expression, you have to use the g flag.
[^\|] means anything but a '|', so in your case it only matches a digit. So it will only match anything with 2 or more digits.
Second you should put the {2} outside of the []-brackets
I'm not sure what you want to achieve here.