I am experiencing very poor performance with the .slideToggle jQuery function in IE8. Its either choppy or it completely freezes the browser. Works great in firefox chrome opera etc.
I think it might be related to my DOCTYPE attribute? I am not sure. However, I have tried many solutions mentioned around the this site and others but none of them have worked so far, that includes making sure none of the sliding elements are set to position: relative.
Here is the script and html. Basically when the user clicks a button on a radio list contained in an upper div that upper div collapses and the lower div opens up with more buttons. They are hidden initially hence the check against .css('display'):
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
function btnList_Type_Click() {
$('#btnList_Type_Div').slideToggle(200, null);
if ($("#btnPanelTwo").css('display') == 'none') {
$('#btnPanelTwo').slideToggle(200, null);
}
if ($("#btnList_Date_Div").css('display') == 'none') {
$('#btnList_Date_Div').slideToggle(200, null);
}
}
<div id="btnPanelTwo" class="lightPanel" onmouseover="page.cursor('pointer')" onmouseout="page.cursor('default')"
style="height: 36px; width:320px; margin-left:20px; margin-top:0px; display:none;">
<span style="font-size: 13pt; left: 14px; top:10px;">Step 2:    Choose Date Range:</span>
</div>
<div id="btnList_Date_Div" style="margin-left:60px; width:320px; height:325px; display:none;">
<asp:RadioButtonList
ID="btnList_Date" runat="server" style="margin-left: 35px; margin-top:12px;"
Width="226px" AutoPostBack="False" Font-Size="11pt"
</asp:RadioButtonList>
<asp:TextBox ID="txt_StartRange" class="textbox" runat="server" style="margin-left: 46px; margin-top:10px;"
Height="22px" Width="98px"></asp:TextBox>
<asp:TextBox ID="txt_EndRange" class="textbox" runat="server" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-top:10px;"
Height="22px" Width="98px"></asp:TextBox> <br />
<asp:Button runat="server" ID="btn_Submit" class="button"
Style="float:right; margin-top:40px; margin-right:56px;" Text="Submit" OnClick="btn_Submit_Click" />
<asp:CalendarExtender ID="CalendarExtender1" runat="server" TargetControlID="txt_StartRange" >
</asp:CalendarExtender>
<asp:CalendarExtender ID="CalendarExtender2" runat="server" TargetControlID="txt_EndRange" >
</asp:CalendarExtender>
</div>
</div>
EDIT Here is the rendered HTML as requested:
<DIV style="WIDTH: 320px; HEIGHT: 36px; MARGIN-LEFT: 20px" id=btnPanel
class=lightPanel onmouseover="page.cursor('pointer')"
onmouseout="page.cursor('default')"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 13pt; TOP: 10px; LEFT: 14px" id=btnPanel_Text>Step 1:
Select a Type of Report:</SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV style="WIDTH: 320px; MARGIN-LEFT: 60px" id=btnList_Type_Div>
<TABLE style="MARGIN-TOP: 12px; MARGIN-LEFT: 35px; FONT-SIZE: 11pt"
id=ContentPlaceHolder1_btnList_Type>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD><INPUT id=ContentPlaceHolder1_btnList_Type_0
onclick=btnList_Type_Click(); value=1 type=radio
name=ctl00$ContentPlaceHolder1$btnList_Type><LABEL
for=ContentPlaceHolder1_btnList_Type_0>Label0</LABEL></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><INPUT id=ContentPlaceHolder1_btnList_Type_1
onclick=btnList_Type_Click(); value=2 type=radio
name=ctl00$ContentPlaceHolder1$btnList_Type><LABEL
for=ContentPlaceHolder1_btnList_Type_1>Label1</LABEL></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><INPUT id=ContentPlaceHolder1_btnList_Type_2
onclick=btnList_Type_Click(); value=3 type=radio
name=ctl00$ContentPlaceHolder1$btnList_Type><LABEL
for=ContentPlaceHolder1_btnList_Type_2>Label2</LABEL></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD><INPUT id=ContentPlaceHolder1_btnList_Type_3
onclick=btnList_Type_Click(); value=4 type=radio
name=ctl00$ContentPlaceHolder1$btnList_Type><LABEL
for=ContentPlaceHolder1_btnList_Type_3>Label3</LABEL></TD></TR>
Label4
Step 2: Choose Date
Range:
Label1
Label2
Label3
Label4
Ok, I ran your page through profiler, and it actually doesn't look that bad. Javascript execution is within the range of reasonable (245ms). Your problem is reflows (takes around 1073ms) to reflow your page fully within your sliding animations. See screenshot.
There are a few things you can do to improve this. First of all, remove margin from your btnList_Type_Div element, as well as padding. JQuery Animation framework is written quite poorly. When you call slide function, it actually runs 5 different animations at the same time, 2 for margins, 2 for padding and one for width or height of your element. Having margins on your element (even though they are not getting animated in your case) is not great for animation. This should improve your reflows quite significantly (in my test it went down from 1073ms down to 217ms).
Second thing I would suggest, get rid of table around your radio buttons, it's absolutely not required for your layout, a few divs will do the trick just fine. If, for some reason, you have to have a table, at least write it out correctly (declare cols with width on each one, set table-layout: fixed style on it, etc.). Tables are quite expansive to reflow, since they have to recalculate the width/height of every cell every time.
Last thing I can suggest (if everything else fails), nest your div inside another one, and then set position: absolute on it. This will take it out of context, which means that nothing else on the page needs to reflow when you change the settings on your div.
Edit:
Oh and one more thing, even though you set your DTD to XHTML Transitional, and Transitional is more forgiving then Strict, you should still try to follow XHTML format, like closing br and input tags, setting the case correctly on tag names, etc. All of this can affect performance greatly as well.
Edit 2:
Since you didn't post the whole source of the page, including all javascripts and css files, I can't really profile it correctly. More than that, my computer might be more powerful than yours, and might still not be able choppiness in the performance of the animation. I suggest you try to profile the page yourself. For that, you will need to install DynaTrace Ajax. Run it, start profiling for IE, it will open default version of IE installed on your machine. Navigate to your page, at that point I suggest setting a mark, just so it would be easier to find, then click on your radio button (and perform whatever other actions you want to profile). Close your browser, and in DynaTrace, you should see a new session on the right, expand it and navigate into PurePaths view. Find the mark you set (should be Mark 1 by default) and then look around it for click events and rendering activities. Once you found something that looks like it's taking longer than it should (duration), you can click on it and expand all child actions until you find what is causing an issue. Now by tweaking HTML, you should be able to profile it each time, till you get close to the result you are looking for.
P.S. If you set position:absolute on your div, you have to wrap it into another div, with position:relative on it, as well as height. Setting absolute positioning will take your div out of context, and parent div will have a height of 0px, unless you set it manually yourself.
Related
I'm working on a project where you can insert your working hours, in which you have to insert start- & end times. But after you put in the start time and tab to go on, it does focus first on the icon, which comes from the
<input type="time">
I want that the tabbing only hits the input area, not the icon next to it.
This is the current state:
example input field:
<div class="text-section">
<label for="startTime"
class="text label without-margin">#((MarkupString)loc["StartTime"].ToString())</label>
<div class="property-container-three">
<div class="property-icon">
<div class="icon solid start" tabIndex="-2">#Icons.Startzeit</div>
</div>
<input class="input-text nomargin centerInputContentVertical"
type="time"
id="startTime"
#ref="startTimeElement"
#bind-value="blazorStartTime"
#onblur="HandleStartTimeSet">
</div>
</div>
I already tried everything with tabindex:"-1", it just makes no difference. Also I'm just able to modify this icon due css, which goes like:
input[type="text"], input[type="date"], input[type="number"], input[type="search"], input[type="time"], input[type="datetime"], input[type="password"], [type="email"], select, textarea {
padding: 8px 12px;
height: 38px;
width: 100%;
}
I do not have any more ideas or approaches...
After some googling I found, it is a known issue with Edge... see this answer, it states that Microsoft do not plan to fix it; but the link they mention is dead.
I can only replicate this bug on Edge. And it seems MS won't solve it...
You can target it with CSS: idea from here
input[type="time"]::-webkit-calendar-picker-indicator` {
display: none:
}
Perhaps setting display: none will be enough and maybe adjusting padding/margin for it too?
Unfortunately, there is currently no stable CSS way to change the tab-index; and currently no way to change the HTML attributes.
The current CSS equivalent for tab-index is -moz-user-focus but this is non-standard and the documentation stresses that you "should not use this".
Similar things exist for grabbing the pseudo element with JavaScript like this question, but again this is for computedStyles which is back to the CSS issue again.
Maybe in future this sort of feature will be introduced and there will be a working answer for it....
so, i'm an intern on my company, and need to deal with some stuff that i'm not 100%.
The thing is, the last google chrome update crashed some css in my java web app. We do work with a table, based on scrum. Basicly a taskboard, where you can set a task, remove it, set is as "to do, doing and done". But, since 12/12 +/- your task was missing from the taskboard. We didn't knew what was going on at the begining, but after a little research we found out that the style of the 'height:100%' of tr td was crashing, and making everything desapear. It works fine in firefox and also in IE. when we did remove the height, the tasks appeared. But the thing is, without the height:100% the jquery droppable ui, that we use to move the tasks inside the table was set to the height automatically, even when it is with height 100%.
We don't want to set a minimal height, because it was supposed to work pretty fine.
Here is the code, it's a little big to text in here, so i typed it on jsfiddle.
https://jsfiddle.net/rychardgoltara/bvw1hkxg/
<tr data-bind="attr:{id: sequencial}" id="2093" class ="selectable">
<td class ="historia" style="height:1px">
<div class="colapsada" style="display:none;">
</div>
<div class="expandida">
<div class="historiaLayout">
<span id=""></span>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<!-- ko foreach: {data: $root.fases, as : 'fase'} -->
<td data-bind="css : 'fase-' + id" class="fase-7">
<div class="colapsada"></div>
<div class="expandida tarefaExpandida">
<div class="nomeFase fase">
<span class="tamanhoVariavel sh-tooltip" data-bind="text: titulo, attr: {'aria-label': titulo}" aria-label="A Fazer">A Fazer</span>
}
.tabelaQT tbody tr td {
border-right: 1px #ccc solid;
height: 100%;
}
.tarefaExpandida {
margin: 5px;
overflow: auto;
height: 100%;
One of our solutions was setting the height:100% on tr td and also setting it to height:-webkit-calc(0px). So it can work fine on chrome without affecting other browsers. But the thing is, this solution is the real solution? Am i missing something? And if this is the solution, why is it? I don't know how to explain the solution to my boss. Here is a pic of what is looks like, and what should looks like.
https://imgur.com/a/DXthL
I'm trying to figure out out to create a event to appear in front of my home without it opening a new page. It would, for lack of a better word, expand to fill the browser. I know I'll have to do some work with z-index and javascript. The month would hover and then the user would click to see the event.
Home and event
My HTML
<div class= "month sep_box">
<h1 class= "sep">SEP</h1>
<div class= "year">2016</div>
</div>
CSS
.sep_box{
background-image: url("images/design_disrupt.svg");
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: cover;
background-clip: content-box;
background-position: center;
float: left;
width: 25%;
height: 25vh;
transition:.25s ease;
}
EDIT: Screen-shoted HTML now copied
<article>
<div><h1 id="design_disruptors">
DESIGN <br />DISRUPTORS</h1></div>
<div><p class="child_day">THURSDAY</p></div>
<div><p class="child_day_number">15</p></div>
<div><p class="child_event_about">JCM 2121<br />7:00pm</p></div>
<div><p class="child_rsvp">RSVP</p></div>
<div><p class="child_desc">Design Disruptors reveals<br />
a never-before-seen<br />
perspective on the design approaches of these<br />
companies and how they<br />
are overtaking billion dollar industries though design.</p>
</div>
</article>
https://jsfiddle.net/es60r7cv/
The comments aren't going to work at this point because of the character limit, so I'm going to try my best to give you some hints here. I am a little unsure as to how far along you are in your development to this point, and the intent of the design, but let's give it a shot.
Firstly, if I understand your design image correctly, you want almost the entire screen to look different except for the square that was clicked. This is going to be difficult, as you'll need to position a lot of elements in just such a way that you can have a transparency in exactly the right spot. Given your design, and how important pixel-perfection is going to be to making it work, and where you are in your development, I'm wondering if it would be ideal to simply fix the width of the whole design (no growing or shrinking with the screen).
I would also recommend you use jQuery for this project, as it will be easier for you.
To add an event listener to all your month boxes using jQuery, you would write it:
$(document).on('click', '.month', function (evt) {
// your event handling code here
}
I would give each month element an id for the month it represented, then create your overlays with a similar id. So, for example, the December month box would be <div class="month" id="december"><!--your_content--></div> and the overlay for the month could be <div class="overlay" id="decemberOverlay"><!--your_overlay_content--></div>. That way you could target it by getting the clicked month boxes id, and getting the overlay by doing that id + "Overlay".
You could fetch your overlay content on the fly using AJAX, but to reduce complexity for yourself you may just always load all overlays to the page and hide them with CSS, but also include the positioning code:
.overlay {
display: none;
z-index: 10;
position: absolute; /* this will position it to the document, or the first parent that is relatively or absolutely positioned */
top: 0;
left: 0
}
We are using absolute positioning because:
we want to be able to position the overlay directly over the original image, and not influence the flow of the rest of the document, and
z-index requires some non-static position value to be applied
Then, in your script, you would update it do be this:
$(document).on('click', '.month', function (evt) {
var clickedMonth = this.id;
var correspondingOverlay = $(clickedMonth+"Overlay");
correspondingOverlay.show();
}
Based on your fiddle and code, I think perhaps you are not very far along yet. Hopefully this gives you a bit of a head start on how to achieve your desired result.
Edit:
One last thing-- this is a cleaner way to style your markup:
<article>
<div>
<h1 id="design_disruptors">DESIGN <br />DISRUPTORS</h1>
</div>
<div>
<p class="child_day">THURSDAY</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="child_day_number">15</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="child_event_about">JCM 2121<br />7:00pm</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="child_rsvp">RSVP</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="child_desc">
Design Disruptors reveals<br />
a never-before-seen<br />
perspective on the design approaches of these<br />
companies and how they<br />
are overtaking billion dollar industries though design.
</p>
</div>
</article>
Clean HTML will be easier to read and easier to spot errors.
Screenreaders will read whatever string is set to the "alt" attribute. The use of this attribute is specifically for image tags.
If I have a div like so:
<div id=myCoolDiv tabindex="0"> 2 <div>
Is there a way to have a screen reader pickup an attribute to read a string the same way an alt tag is used?
So for the div listed below, the screen reader will say ie: "shopping cart items 2"?
I tried using aria-label but the screenreader won't pick it up:
<div id=myCoolDiv tabindex="0" aria-label="shopping cart items"> 2 <div>
You can just put a title tag in the div which will do the same as an alt tag like so:
<div title="I AM HELLO WORLD">HELLO WORLD</div>
"I AM HELLO WORLD" will be printed once you move your cursor around it on a browser
There are two ways (which can be combined) to have screen reader to read alternative text:
Anything with ARIA role img can (MUST) have alt attribute. See WAI-ARIA img role.
<div role="img" alt="heart">
♥︎
</div>
UPDATE: In 2017 the WAI-ARIA document was changed and the following text does not apply anymore. See comments below.
However this should be used only in case the element really represent an image (e.g. the heart unicode character).
If an element contain actual text, that just need different reading, you should set ARIA role to text and add aria-label with whatever you want to be read by the screen reader. See WAI-ARIA text role.
<div role="text" aria-label="Rating: 60%">
Rating: ★★★☆☆︎
</div>
Do not mismatch it with aria-labeledby which should contain ID of an related element.
You can combine the previous two cases into one using two ARIA roles and adding both alt and aria-label:
<div role="img text" alt="heart" aria-label="heart">
♥︎
</div>
When more ARIA roles are defined, browser should use the first one that is supported and process the element with that role.
One last important thing is that you must set page type to HTML5 (which support ARIA by design).
<!DOCTYPE html>
Using HTML4 or XHTML requires special DTD to enable ARIA support.
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+ARIA 1.0//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/schemata/xhtml-aria-1.dtd">
Try role="listitem" or role="group" and aria-labelledby="shopping cart items". See Example 1. The 2 is text content which should be read by screen reader already with the attribute read as context to the content. Refer to this section.
UPDATE 2
Add aria-readonly=true role=textbox if you use an input. If there are doubts whether to use aria-label or aria-labelledby, read this article. In the documentation for JAWS and testing it myself supports the fact that aria-label is ignored. Furthermore, semantics are very important when accessibility is your concern. Using a div when you could use an input is not semantically sound and like I said before, JAWS would accept a form element more readily than a div. I assume that this "shopping cart" is a form or part of a form, and if you don't like it's borders, input {border: 0 none transparent} or use <output>* which would be A+ as far as semantics are concerned.
Sorry, #RadekPech reminded me; I forgot to add that using aria-labelledby needs visible text and that the text needs an id which is also listed as the value(s) of aria-labelledby. If you don't want text because of aesthetics, use color: transparent, line-height: 0, or color:<same as background>. That should satisfy visibility as far as the DOM is concerned* and still be invisible to the naked eye. Keep in mind these measures are because JAWS ignores aria-label.
*untested
EXAMPLE 3
<span id="shopping">Shopping</span>
<span id="cart">Cart</span>
<span id="items">Items</span>
<input id='cart' tabindex="0" aria-readonly=true readonly role="textbox" aria-labelledby="shopping cart items" value='2'>
UPDATE 1
For JAWS, you probably have to configure it a little:
Click the Utilities menu item.
Then Settings Center.
Speech and Sounds Schemes
Modiy Scheme...
HTML Tab
In this particular dialog box, you can add specific attributes and what is said when an element is tabbed to. JAWS will respond to form elements easier because they can trigger the focus event. You'll have an easier time doing Example 2 instead:
EXAMPLE 1
<div id=myCoolDiv tabindex="0" role="listitem" aria-labelledby="shopping cart items"> 2 <div>
EXAMPLE 2
<input id='semantic' tabindex="0" role="listitem" aria-labelledby="shopping cart items" value='2' readonly>
In case you use Bootstrap Framework there is a quick and easy solution. You should use sr-only or sr-only sr-only-focusable Bootstrap's CSS classes in a span element where your screen-reader-only text will be written.
Check the following example, a span element with class glyphicon glyphicon-shopping-cart is also used as cart icon.
<div id="myCoolDiv">
<h5>
<span class="glyphicon glyphicon-shopping-cart"></span> 2
<span class="sr-only sr-only-focusable" tabindex="0">shopping cart items</span>
</h5>
<div>
Screen Reader Output: "two shopping cart items"
provided by Fangs Screen Reader Emulator Addon for Firefox
You can find the above working example in this: Fiddle
As suggested by Oriol, in case you don't use Bootstrap Framework then simply add the following in your CSS file.
.sr-only {
position: absolute;
width: 1px;
height: 1px;
padding: 0;
margin: -1px;
overflow: hidden;
clip: rect(0, 0, 0, 0);
border: 0;
}
.sr-only-focusable:active,
.sr-only-focusable:focus {
position: static;
width: auto;
height: auto;
margin: 0;
overflow: visible;
clip: auto;
}
According to the text alternative computation algorithm of the W3C and the
Accessible Name and Description: Computation and API Mappings 1.1 you definitely should use aria-label.
That being said, it does not work with Jaws. Text alternative is only computed for elements having an ARIA role.
The remaining option is to use a link that will go to your cart page, using both title and aria-label to satisfy anyone:
2
You can also use a transparent 1 pixel option:
2 <img src="pixel.png" height="1" width="1" alt="shopping cart items" />
No, there is no equivalent to an alt attribute for <div> elements.
For what you are trying to do, an ARIA-based solution is overkill. Not only are you bumping into screen reader compatibility problems, you are applying ARIA attributes where they are not needed (and arguably do not belong if on something like a <div>).
Instead, consider using an off-screen technique (such as this one from The Paciello Group or this one from WebAIM). Content hidden using this technique will still be read by screen readers but will be visually hidden.
From reading your question, I think this is what you are after.
I made a pen demonstrating this technique. It may be easier to test in the full-page version.
Edit: Added HTML and CSS from the example, but please note that both the specs and browser / assistive technology support change over time, so if you are reading this in a year you should continue to use the links above to verify this CSS is still the current best practice.
HTML
<div tabindex="0">
<span class="offscreen">Items in shopping cart: </span>2
</div>
CSS
.offscreen {
position: absolute;
clip: rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);
/* for Internet Explorer */
clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);
padding: 0;
border: 0;
height: 1px;
width: 1px;
overflow: hidden;
}
Accessibility (Screen readers) can be achieved through role and aria-label tags on div. This can be very useful while using svg.
<div role="img" aria-label="I can speak the text">
<svg>...</svg>
</div>
Try:
HTML
<div id=myCoolDiv tabindex="0"><span class="aria-hidden">shopping cart items</span>2<div>
CSS
.aria-hidden {
position: absolute;
left: -100000px;
}
This will announce the text inside the span. And the Parent div will not lose visual focus. Aria-hidden class will hide the span from the visible screen area but will read it as its inside the div that has focus.
You can create a class such as screen-reader-text with the following css:
.screen-reader-text {
clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);
height: 1px;
width: 1px;
overflow: hidden;
position: absolute !important;
}
Then, in your code, you can just add a <span> with the screenreader text as so:
<div>
I am a div!
<span class="screen-reader-text">This is my screen reader text</span>
</div>
See an example over here: https://jsfiddle.net/zj1zuk9y/
(Source: http://www.coolfields.co.uk/2016/05/text-for-screen-readers-only-updated/)
Use an image inside the div that has the label as its alt attribute. That way, those without screen readers just see the number and an image, whereas those with readers will hear the whole sentence:
<div>
<img src="http://tny.im/57j" alt="Shopping cart items" />
2
</div>
Seen as:
2
Read as: "Shopping cart items: 2"
The alt attribute exists for images because there is no way to "read aloud" the content of the image, so the provided text is used instead. But for the div, it already contains text and images. Therefore, if you want it to be read by a screen-reader, you need to include the text and alt text in the content of the div.
I have developed an application in mootools. But its going little slow coz of number of tags it contains are almost 10,000. and every tag's structure is like:
<div style="float:left;padding:5px;margin: 6px;"> <!-- tag-1 -->
<img src=""> <p>name</p> <p>Gender</p> <p>Mood</p>
</div>
in following container
<div id="tags_container" style="overflow: scroll;height: 700px;">
<div style="float:left;padding:5px;margin: 6px;"> <!-- tag-1 -->
<img src=""> <p>name</p> <p>Gender</p> <p>Mood</p>
</div>
<!-- tag-2 -->
.
.
.
<!-- all tags one after another -->
</div>
i m showing these tags in rows and columns format ( 5 columns and 2000 rows).
The id="tags_container" < div > has vertical scrollbar. but when i try to scroll down in that division to see further tags it scrolls little slow.
what should i do about it?
should i change the implementation method from < div > tags to < table > tag?
what are the options to make it any faster?
In few previous questions, i was advised not to use those many tags in one single document but there is gonna be those many tags so what should i do about it.?
I've done something like this before. Use more CSS classes and fewer elements, and remove everything unnecessary (like comments). Though the data was tabular in nature, I found it much easier to create a pixel-perfect layout using <div>s.
Markup
<div class="cell">
<img src=""> <p>name</p> <p>Gender</p> <p>Mood</p>
</div>
CSS
div.cell {
float: left;
padding: 5px;
margin: 6px;
}
If possible, it may also be quicker to use CSS spriting for the images, rather than 10k more elements for the images. Something like:
Markup
<div class="cell" style="background-position: 0px 0px;">
<p>name</p> <p>Gender</p> <p>Mood</p>
</div>
CSS
div.cell {
float: left;
padding: 5px;
margin: 6px;
background-image: url(path/to/sprite);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
Edit If you need to do any sort of DOM manipulation of these elements, I recommend loading all of them up into a JS array — once — and then accessing them by index from the array. Repeatedly querying the DOM for the same elements will wreck performance.
If possible, also remove the <p> elements within each <div>. If you've got 10k <div> elements, each containing 3 <p>s, then you're really working with a minimum of 40k elements.
That's a lot of DOM, baby.
If you can figure out how to get the same layout removing even just 1 or 2 <p>s from each <div>, you're instantly down to 20k or 30k elements.
Why not use a table? It looks like you're trying to build a table with divs.
Sounds like a tabular document to me. Why not use a table?
Note that even with a table you may have some trouble, but I suspect it will be faster.
You should also consider using a class for your styling, rather than doing it manually for each row.
That seems to be the exact reason tables were created in the first place - tabular style data. Any reason you aren't using tables already?
A large amount of tabular data renders fastest if you break it up into separate tbodies, and set table-layout to fixed. Keep all the style info out of the html and in a style element or linked stylesheet.
Is it necessary to show all 10,000 rows on the page at once? Perhaps you could look at implementing the ScrollSpy plugin developed by David Walsh. This will allow you to load a smaller initial record set then access more records when required.