Automated browser requests: detection, ajax vs iframes - javascript

I am doing automated (at predefined times, without user intervention) requests, and it seems that xmlHttpRequest includes additional http headers.
As i would like the server NOT to be able to identify these requests are automated (must be exactly the same as normal user navigation), do i need to instead use iframes, or can i still use ajax and remove/set these headers? (currently using jQuery)
If i do need to use iframes, since my 'app' is a chrome extension, are there any issues i should be aware of?

You can modify some headers using setRequestHeader. According to the spec, you cannot set the following headers:
Accept-Charset
Accept-Encoding
Connection
Content-Length
Cookie
Cookie2
Content-Transfer-Encoding
Date
Expect
Host
Keep-Alive
Referer
TE
Trailer
Transfer-Encoding
Upgrade
User-Agent
Via
or if the start of header is a
case-insensitive match for Proxy- or
Sec- (including when header is just
Proxy- or Sec-).
If that is not what you want, then you must use an iframe, I do that with the fb-exporter Chrome Extension. Later on I changed it to XHR since it just works.

Related

Can't get basic HTTP POST function to work from localhost with Javascript [duplicate]

I am building a web API. I found whenever I use Chrome to POST, GET to my API, there is always an OPTIONS request sent before the real request, which is quite annoying. Currently, I get the server to ignore any OPTIONS requests. Now my question is what's good to send an OPTIONS request to double the server's load? Is there any way to completely stop the browser from sending OPTIONS requests?
edit 2018-09-13: added some precisions about this pre-flight request and how to avoid it at the end of this reponse.
OPTIONS requests are what we call pre-flight requests in Cross-origin resource sharing (CORS).
They are necessary when you're making requests across different origins in specific situations.
This pre-flight request is made by some browsers as a safety measure to ensure that the request being done is trusted by the server.
Meaning the server understands that the method, origin and headers being sent on the request are safe to act upon.
Your server should not ignore but handle these requests whenever you're attempting to do cross origin requests.
A good resource can be found here http://enable-cors.org/
A way to handle these to get comfortable is to ensure that for any path with OPTIONS method the server sends a response with this header
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
This will tell the browser that the server is willing to answer requests from any origin.
For more information on how to add CORS support to your server see the following flowchart
http://www.html5rocks.com/static/images/cors_server_flowchart.png
edit 2018-09-13
CORS OPTIONS request is triggered only in somes cases, as explained in MDN docs:
Some requests don’t trigger a CORS preflight. Those are called “simple requests” in this article, though the Fetch spec (which defines CORS) doesn’t use that term. A request that doesn’t trigger a CORS preflight—a so-called “simple request”—is one that meets all the following conditions:
The only allowed methods are:
GET
HEAD
POST
Apart from the headers set automatically by the user agent (for example, Connection, User-Agent, or any of the other headers with names defined in the Fetch spec as a “forbidden header name”), the only headers which are allowed to be manually set are those which the Fetch spec defines as being a “CORS-safelisted request-header”, which are:
Accept
Accept-Language
Content-Language
Content-Type (but note the additional requirements below)
DPR
Downlink
Save-Data
Viewport-Width
Width
The only allowed values for the Content-Type header are:
application/x-www-form-urlencoded
multipart/form-data
text/plain
No event listeners are registered on any XMLHttpRequestUpload object used in the request; these are accessed using the XMLHttpRequest.upload property.
No ReadableStream object is used in the request.
Have gone through this issue, below is my conclusion to this issue and my solution.
According to the CORS strategy (highly recommend you read about it) You can't just force the browser to stop sending OPTIONS request if it thinks it needs to.
There are two ways you can work around it:
Make sure your request is a "simple request"
Set Access-Control-Max-Age for the OPTIONS request
Simple request
A simple cross-site request is one that meets all the following conditions:
The only allowed methods are:
GET
HEAD
POST
Apart from the headers set automatically by the user agent (e.g. Connection, User-Agent, etc.), the only headers which are allowed to be manually set are:
Accept
Accept-Language
Content-Language
Content-Type
The only allowed values for the Content-Type header are:
application/x-www-form-urlencoded
multipart/form-data
text/plain
A simple request will not cause a pre-flight OPTIONS request.
Set a cache for the OPTIONS check
You can set a Access-Control-Max-Age for the OPTIONS request, so that it will not check the permission again until it is expired.
Access-Control-Max-Age gives the value in seconds for how long the response to the preflight request can be cached for without sending another preflight request.
Limitation Noted
For Chrome, the maximum seconds for Access-Control-Max-Age is 600 which is 10 minutes, according to chrome source code
Access-Control-Max-Age only works for one resource every time, for example, GET requests with same URL path but different queries will be treated as different resources. So the request to the second resource will still trigger a preflight request.
Please refer this answer on the actual need for pre-flighted OPTIONS request: CORS - What is the motivation behind introducing preflight requests?
To disable the OPTIONS request, below conditions must be satisfied for ajax request:
Request does not set custom HTTP headers like 'application/xml' or 'application/json' etc
The request method has to be one of GET, HEAD or POST. If POST, content type should be one of application/x-www-form-urlencoded, multipart/form-data, or text/plain
Reference:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Access_control_CORS
When you have the debug console open and the Disable Cache option turned on, preflight requests will always be sent (i.e. before each and every request). if you don't disable the cache, a pre-flight request will be sent only once (per server)
Yes it's possible to avoid options request. Options request is a preflight request when you send (post) any data to another domain. It's a browser security issue. But we can use another technology: iframe transport layer. I strongly recommend you forget about any CORS configuration and use readymade solution and it will work anywhere.
Take a look here:
https://github.com/jpillora/xdomain
And working example:
http://jpillora.com/xdomain/
For a developer who understands the reason it exists but needs to access an API that doesn't handle OPTIONS calls without auth, I need a temporary answer so I can develop locally until the API owner adds proper SPA CORS support or I get a proxy API up and running.
I found you can disable CORS in Safari and Chrome on a Mac.
Disable same origin policy in Chrome
Chrome: Quit Chrome, open an terminal and paste this command: open /Applications/Google\ Chrome.app --args --disable-web-security --user-data-dir
Safari: Disabling same-origin policy in Safari
If you want to disable the same-origin policy on Safari (I have 9.1.1), then you only need to enable the developer menu, and select "Disable Cross-Origin Restrictions" from the develop menu.
As mentioned in previous posts already, OPTIONS requests are there for a reason. If you have an issue with large response times from your server (e.g. overseas connection) you can also have your browser cache the preflight requests.
Have your server reply with the Access-Control-Max-Age header and for requests that go to the same endpoint the preflight request will have been cached and not occur anymore.
I have solved this problem like.
if($_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'] == 'OPTIONS' && ENV == 'devel') {
header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *');
header('Access-Control-Allow-Headers: X-Requested-With');
header("HTTP/1.1 200 OK");
die();
}
It is only for development. With this I am waiting 9ms and 500ms and not 8s and 500ms. I can do that because production JS app will be on the same machine as production so there will be no OPTIONS but development is my local.
You can't but you could avoid CORS using JSONP.
After spending a whole day and a half trying to work through a similar problem I found it had to do with IIS.
My Web API project was set up as follows:
// WebApiConfig.cs
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
{
var cors = new EnableCorsAttribute("*", "*", "*");
config.EnableCors(cors);
//...
}
I did not have CORS specific config options in the web.config > system.webServer node like I have seen in so many posts
No CORS specific code in the global.asax or in the controller as a decorator
The problem was the app pool settings.
The managed pipeline mode was set to classic (changed it to integrated) and the Identity was set to Network Service (changed it to ApplicationPoolIdentity)
Changing those settings (and refreshing the app pool) fixed it for me.
OPTIONS request is a feature of web browsers, so it's not easy to disable it. But I found a way to redirect it away with proxy. It's useful in case that the service endpoint just cannot handle CORS/OPTIONS yet, maybe still under development, or mal-configured.
Steps:
Setup a reverse proxy for such requests with tools of choice (nginx, YARP, ...)
Create an endpoint just to handle the OPTIONS request. It might be easier to create a normal empty endpoint, and make sure it handles CORS well.
Configure two sets of rules for the proxy. One is to route all OPTIONS requests to the dummy endpoint above. Another to route all other requests to actual endpoint in question.
Update the web site to use proxy instead.
Basically this approach is to cheat browser that OPTIONS request works. Considering CORS is not to enhance security, but to relax the same-origin policy, I hope this trick could work for a while. :)
you can also use a API Manager (like Open Sources Gravitee.io) to prevent CORS issues between frontend app and backend services by manipulating headers in preflight.
Header used in response to a preflight request to indicate which HTTP headers can be used when making the actual request :
content-type
access-control-allow-header
authorization
x-requested-with
and specify the "allow-origin" = localhost:4200 for example
One solution I have used in the past - lets say your site is on mydomain.com, and you need to make an ajax request to foreigndomain.com
Configure an IIS rewrite from your domain to the foreign domain - e.g.
<rewrite>
<rules>
<rule name="ForeignRewrite" stopProcessing="true">
<match url="^api/v1/(.*)$" />
<action type="Rewrite" url="https://foreigndomain.com/{R:1}" />
</rule>
</rules>
</rewrite>
on your mydomain.com site - you can then make a same origin request, and there's no need for any options request :)
It can be solved in case of use of a proxy that intercept the request and write the appropriate headers.
In the particular case of Varnish these would be the rules:
if (req.http.host == "CUSTOM_URL" ) {
set resp.http.Access-Control-Allow-Origin = "*";
if (req.method == "OPTIONS") {
set resp.http.Access-Control-Max-Age = "1728000";
set resp.http.Access-Control-Allow-Methods = "GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH, OPTIONS";
set resp.http.Access-Control-Allow-Headers = "Authorization,Content-Type,Accept,Origin,User-Agent,DNT,Cache-Control,X-Mx-ReqToken,Keep-Alive,X-Requested-With,If-Modified-Since";
set resp.http.Content-Length = "0";
set resp.http.Content-Type = "text/plain charset=UTF-8";
set resp.status = 204;
}
}
What worked for me was to import "github.com/gorilla/handlers" and then use it this way:
router := mux.NewRouter()
router.HandleFunc("/config", getConfig).Methods("GET")
router.HandleFunc("/config/emcServer", createEmcServers).Methods("POST")
headersOk := handlers.AllowedHeaders([]string{"X-Requested-With", "Content-Type"})
originsOk := handlers.AllowedOrigins([]string{"*"})
methodsOk := handlers.AllowedMethods([]string{"GET", "HEAD", "POST", "PUT", "OPTIONS"})
log.Fatal(http.ListenAndServe(":" + webServicePort, handlers.CORS(originsOk, headersOk, methodsOk)(router)))
As soon as I executed an Ajax POST request and attaching JSON data to it, Chrome would always add the Content-Type header which was not in my previous AllowedHeaders config.

Safari 10.1: XMLHttpRequest with query parameters cannot load due to access control checks

When trying a CORS request on Safari 10.1, on an URL which includes query parameters (e.g. https://example.com/api?v=1), Safari says
XMLHttpRequest cannot load due to access control checks
Chrome/Firefox works fine.
On requests from the page without the ?v=1, Safari works fine too.
I tried changing the server response header from
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: https://example.com
to
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: https://example.com/api?v=1
but that breaks Chrome.
Any suggestions?
You're running into CORS issues.
Some possible causes:
The header Access-Control-Allow-Origin can only be set on server side, not in your clients script. (You did not make clear you did that correctly.)
Are you sure the protocol (http vs https vs maybe even file) is exactly the same?
If you may have multiple sub domains you need to setup your config (e.g. Apache) with something like "^http(s)?://(.+\.)?test\.com$
.
The ^ marks the start of the line to prevent anything preceeding this url. You need a protocol and allowing both here. A subdomain is optional. And the $ marks the end of line (you don't need to set sub-pages, because origin is only host based).
As stated here adding Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Origin to the server configuration as well may be a solution. Try to compare the actual requests made my Safari to the successfull requests done by Firefox or Chrome to spot possible missing Headers as well (and maybe compare them to your server configuration as well).
If anyone comes across this error, it just occurred in the application I was building. In my case, it turned out to be a trailing / in the uri, which caused a 301 response, which was for some reason interpreted by Safari as a 500 response.
Trying following might work -
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: <origin> | *
The problem is because it is necessary to be more specific in the data of the cors this does not happen in the other operating systems that do interpret it
This one worked for me for a back in php
header ("Access-Control-Allow-Headers: X-API-KEY, Origin, X-Requested-With, Content-Type, Accept, Access-Control-Request-Method");
header ("Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST, OPTIONS, PUT, DELETE");
header ("Allow: GET, POST, OPTIONS, PUT, DELETE");
$ method = $ _SERVER ['REQUEST_METHOD'];
if ($ method == "OPTIONS") {
     die ();
}
Your server needs to reply to the OPTIONS http method. Not only to GET/POST/PUT/DELETE. Safari silently requests this hidden in the background. You can discover this with a MITM-attack on the connection, e.g. Fiddler.
The OPTIONS request at least needs to respond with the Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) headers, e.g.:
Access-Control-Allow-Headers
Access-Control-Allow-Methods
Access-Control-Allow-Origin
Additionally: Your Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Application Security Manager (ASM) needs to allow the OPTIONS request to pass through to your server. Often this is blocked by default, because it gives some slivers of information about the attack surface variables (http methods & headers) used by your API.
You should check the method type you calling may be - PUT, POST, GET etc.

XMLHttpRequest: How to force caching?

I'm newer to XMLHttpRequests since I've previously used jQuery's AjAX method. However I need to work in a web worker and now I have to use the classic XMLHttpRequest for performance issues.
I'm trying to rebuild the cache-property from jquery. If cache should be disabled I add this:
xhr.setRequestHeader("Cache-Control", "no-cache");
But what header should I set if I want to force caching (not prevent)?
You can specify max-stale without an argument, in Cache-Control header of your request. From RFC 7234:
The max-stale request directive indicates that the client is willing to accept a response that has exceeded its freshness lifetime. If max-stale is assigned a value, then the client is willing to accept a response that has exceeded its freshness lifetime by no more than the specified number of seconds. If no value is assigned to max-stale, then the client is willing to accept a stale response of any age.
There are a variety of headers you can set to encourage caching, but they (including Cache-Control which you are using incorrectly) are response headers that must be sent by the server and not request headers.
One such example of using Cache-Control:
Cache-Control: max-age=3600
This Caching Tutorial for Web Authors and Webmasters covers them in more depth.
Please check Caching static assets
Cache-Control: public, max-age=604800, immutable

how to serve pre-flight request from web service

I have a web service which works over GET. To access this web service, some custom headers need to be passed.
When I try to access the web service from javascript code with GET method, the request method is getting changed to OPTIONS. (the domain is different)
I read some articles to find out that a request with Custom headers will be pre-flighted and in that case before the actual method call, a request with OPTIONS method will be made to the server.
But my problem is after the OPTIONS call, the real method (i.e GET) is not being invoked.
The OPTIONS call is returning the status as 401.
I doubt this is because my web-service supports GET only. How can I solve the problem?
Kindly help.
(My code is working fine with IE but not with other browser e.g. Chrome)
Two things to check for (with no idea what your server-side language / technique is):
Are you including OPTIONS as a valid method in your Access-Control-Allow-Methods? Example:
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, OPTIONS
Are the custom headers that your request sending being returned to the browser as allowed?
Example:
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: X-PINGOTHER
The remote server has to return both of these (and most definitely the second one) before any secure, standards-compliant browser (ie not older versions of IE), will allow the non-origin response to come through.
So, if you wanted to implement this at the HTTP server level and keep your web-service portable, you might try the following:
We'll assume your web-service URL is http://example.org/service and that the path to service is /srv/www/service
If you are running Apache 2.0, the syntax to append headers is add, on 2.2, use set.
So, you would modify /srv/www/service/.htaccess with:
Header set Access-Control-Allow-Methods "GET, OPTIONS"
Header set Access-Control-Allow-Headers "X-MY_CUSTOM_HEADER1,X-MY_CUSTOM_HEADER2"
Header set Access-Control-Allow-Origin "*"
Of course, the mod_headers Apache module needs to be on for the above to work. Also, setting the allow-origin to the wild card is risky, and it will actually cause the request to fail if you are sending the Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true header (can't use wild cards in that case). Also, with the SetEnvIf mod for Apache, you could fine tune the htaccess file to only return the headers when appropriate, rather than for all requests to that directory.

Can jQuery.getJSON put a domain's cookies in the header of the request it makes?

(Note: See also the related question Can browsers react to Set-Cookie specified in headers in an XSS jquery.getJSON() request?)
I can't seem to set a cookie (whose name is mwLastWriteTime) in the request header of a JSON operation. The request itself is a simple one from the Freebase MQL tutorials, and it is working fine otherwise:
// Invoke mqlread and call the function below when it is done.
// Adding callback=? to the URL makes jQuery do JSONP instead of XHR.
jQuery.getJSON("http://api.sandbox-freebase.com/api/service/mqlread?callback=?",
{query: JSON.stringify(envelope)}, // URL parameters
displayResults); // Callback function
I'd hoped that I could set this cookie with something along the lines of:
$.cookie('mwLastWriteTime', value, {domain: ".sandbox-freebase.com"});
Unfortunately, looking in FireBug at the outgoing request header I see only:
Host api.sandbox-freebase.com
User-Agent [...]
Accept */*
Accept-Language en-us,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding gzip,deflate
Accept-Charset ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Keep-Alive 115
Connection keep-alive
Referer [...]
But if I don't specify the domain (or if I explicitly specify the domain of the requesting site) I can get mwLastWriteTime to show up in the headers for local requests. Since the .sandbox-freebase.com domain owns these cookies, shouldn't they be traveling along with the GET? Or does one need a workaround of some sort?
My code is all JavaScript, and I would like to set this cookie and then call the getJSON immediately afterward.
You cannot set a cross-domain cookie, because that would open the browser (and therefore the user) to XSS attacks.
To quote from the QuirksMode.org article that I reference above:
Please note that the purpose of the
domain is to allow cookies to cross
sub-domains. My cookie will not be
read by search.quirksmode.org because
its domain is www.quirksmode.org .
When I set the domain to
quirksmode.org, the search sub-domain
may also read the cookie. I cannot set
the cookie domain to a domain I'm not
in, I cannot make the domain
www.microsoft.com . Only
quirksmode.org is allowed, in this
case.
If you want to make cross-site request with cookie values you will need to set up a special proxy on a server you control that will let you pass in values to be sent as cookie values (probably via POST parameters). You'll also want to make sure that you properly secure it, lest your proxy become the means by which someone else's private information is "liberated".
Are you running all of your tests through localhost? Are you using IE? If so it will be enforcing its own special brand of security requirements and likely dumping your cookies. Open fiddler and use http://ipv4.fiddler to bypass that.
If that type of trickery is not going on (as it appears you are using FireFox) , it may also be the case that you do need to explicitely set the cookie's domain to be the same as the domain of your JSON request. A browser won't send cookies set for domain A to a request to domain B. I am not 100% sure this is the case though.

Categories

Resources