Hi I have a problem(not exactly problem, I have solved it, but it is at least very interesting) with differet bahaviour of jquery selectors in IE(7-8) mobile Opera, and other browsers..
Here is my example
<div id="galleryEl"><link href="http://designclub.cz/plugins/content/plugin_jw_sig/sig.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<style type="text/css">.sig_cont {width:30px;height:20px;}</style>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://designclub.cz/plugins/content/plugin_jw_sig/mootools.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://designclub.cz/plugins/content/plugin_jw_sig/slimbox.js"></script>
<div class="sig"><div class="sig_cont"><div class="sig_thumb"><a href="http://designclub.cz/images/stories/hp/hp-falper.jpg" rel="lightbox[sig0]" title="<b>hp-falper.jpg</b>" alt="hp-falper.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://designclub.cz/plugins/content/plugin_jw_sig/showthumb.php?img=hp/hp-falper.jpg&width=0&height=0&quality=0">
Sorry about the formatting:)
The problem is following..When I use this selector jQuery("#galleryEl .sig_thumb a").eq(index); (index is really an integer) in major modern browsers it just works..
but in IE(7-9) (6 ia haven't tested) it doesn't..When I look into IE developer console, it looks like the result object is some kind of plain dom object???I am really not sure, not so skilled in js, but it seems so:)
When I change the jQuery(".sig_thumb a").eq(index); it selects the right dom element..The markup is so weird because of it's a joomla plugin, I am using it to dynamicaly creating background slideshows accroding to folder structure..So does anybody know wherefrom comes this weird behaviour?
And second question..I really want to make it efficient, so which kind of selector is the best one in this case?I know that when selecting over id, jQuery uses js native method, the same in case of tagName and so on, but I am really not sure how about the combinations if this selectors(whether is better to use id-tag-class-someOtherStuff, or id-class-someOtherStuff, id-someOtherStuff {in case that between id and the result object are many other DOM elements})
Thank for your help
Be sure that there is only 1 element with the ID "galleryEl" . If there are more than one, it depends on the IE-Version and the compatibility-mode if the first or the last be selected.
example for testing:
<script type="text/javascript">
jQuery(
function($)
{
alert('Found:'+jQuery("#someID .someclass").eq(1).text());
}
);
</script>
<div id="someID"><span class="someclass">1</span></div>
<div id="someID"><span class="someclass">2</span><span class="someclass">3</span></div>
Related
I have created an DOM element for an MDC slider (https://material.io/develop/web/components/sliders).
It looks nice (except for the colors). And it works, but I really have no idea how to initialize it.
I import MDC from the CDN. I can't understand from the documentation how to do the initialization. This is one version that works:
setTimeout(() => { slider = new mdc.slider.MDCSlider(eltSlider) });
Without setTimeout it does not work.
I have tried using a Promise instead and wait a second. That does not work.
And maybe even worse: If I use a Promise to wait after the setTimeout it does not work any more.
What is going on and how am I supposed to do it?
I do not use ts. And I do not use any package handler. Just plain JavaScript. (And I would be glad if the documentation covered this use case first.)
(There seems to be only one other question about MDCSlider here. It does not cover my question: actual use of foundation and adapter class of mdc-components)
EDIT: By "import from CDN" I mean the setup mentioned here: https://material.io/develop/web/docs/getting-started
<link href="https://unpkg.com/material-components-web#latest/dist/material-components-web.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
<script src="https://unpkg.com/material-components-web#latest/dist/material-components-web.min.js"></script>
There is no JavaScript error. It is just the slider on the screen that does not work. (It looks ok, but it does not work.)
I think this is a problem with MDC and the DOM state. The example in the link above suggests that the DOM is ready, but it does not say so. And it does not explain how to check this when manipulating the DOM with JavaScript.
it seems the latest version on unpkg was recently changed from 8.0.0 to 9.0.0 fixing this issue
<script src="https://unpkg.com/material-components-web#9.0.0/dist/material-components-web.js"></script>
<link href="https://unpkg.com/material-components-web#9.0.0/dist/material-components-web.css" rel="stylesheet">
<div class="mdc-slider">
<input class="mdc-slider__input" type="range" min="0" max="100" value="50" name="volume" aria-label="Continuous slider demo">
<div class="mdc-slider__track">
<div class="mdc-slider__track--inactive"></div>
<div class="mdc-slider__track--active">
<div class="mdc-slider__track--active_fill"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="mdc-slider__thumb">
<div class="mdc-slider__thumb-knob"></div>
</div>
</div>
<script>
sldr = new mdc.slider.MDCSlider(document.querySelector('.mdc-slider'));
sldr.root.addEventListener('MDCSlider:change', (e)=>console.log(e));
</script>
now works as expected https://stackblitz.com/edit/js-4ycwx5?file=index.html
Here is some documentation about using MDC Web in plain JavaScript - https://material.io/develop/web/docs/importing-js, section "Global / CDN".
Make sure you call JavaScript after slider HTML is loaded. Usually I insert it just before the closing body tag.
Here is an example of slider initialization code for JavaScript:
const MDCSlider = mdc.slider.MDCSlider;
const slider = new MDCSlider(document.querySelector('.mdc-slider'));
Here is a minimum working example of the MDCSlider - https://jsfiddle.net/klyakh/oky0zf7e/1/
Hopefully I can explain my question correctly, so sorry in advance for any wrong use of jargon or other:
Is it possible to access with javascript the original markup as viewed in the source code rather then the code from the DOM after it has been 'modified'
Let's say an element #div1 has the actual text that will be used in another element with id #div2, in the source code the text will be visible in #div1 but in the DOM while inspecting #div1 will be empty and #div2 will have that text,
I know it would be a matter of the order of loading the scripts, but I was hoping there could be another way.
Hopefully this makes some sense.
Yep, the simpliest way to access original html is to place your js code before any other scripts (or place only libs like jquery before).
The second opportunity is to load document again with ajax, parse and get what you want. Here is code example:
<div id="div1">
Hello
</div>
<div id="div2">
</div>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.12.4.min.js"></script>
<script>
$('#div2').html($('#div1').html())
$('#div1').html('')
</script>
<script>
alert($('#div1').html())
// ajax get
// empty string in get request means current location
$.get("", function (html) {
var el = $(html).filter('#div1');
alert(el.html())
});
</script>
I chose Swipebox as my lightbox because the requirements that I want is that it is swipable in mobile devices ad is responsive.
I mainly used this for images. However, I have a use case where I want to use Swipebox to show HTML.
Can this be done?
If this feature is not supported by Swipebox, are there any alternatives that support the featureset that I am looking for(swipeable + responsive + can show HTML)?
Swipebox can display inline content. Probably is not documented but you can view it in this issue answer:
https://github.com/brutaldesign/swipebox/issues/248
...
...
<div style="display: none">
<div id="slide1">Slide 1 Content</div>
<div id="slide2">Slide 2 Content</div>
</div>
I use the option "afterOpen: function () {}" clean the content of swipebox and put my content there. Here is my code:
var html = $('the HTML');
$('.swipebox').swipebox({
afterOpen: function () {
$('#swipebox-slider').empty();
$('#swipebox-slider').append(html);
}
});
I found this one (bxSlider) but I have not tried it yet. It claims to support what you need.
Perhaps your CSS isnt loaded correctly.
Check to make sure that you have the following code within your head:
<link rel="stylesheet" href="source/swipebox.css"/>
Hope this helps,
#_Sub
I'm using jQuery to get the contents of a <strong> tag. A sample of the code is:
Trip ID: <strong name="tripID">10</strong>
...
<script type="text/javascript">
...
var tripID = $('strong[name=tripID]').text();
alert(tripID);
</script>
Firefox correctly alert()s "10". Chrome, however, alert()s "101010". Has anyone come across this or does anyone have any insights?
Edit
Changing the <strong name="tripID"> to a <span class="tripID" style="font-weight:bold;"> and changing the corresponding selector in my javascript made it work as expected. I'm still interested in what caused that behavior though!
Edit 2
I'm going to chock this up to some other part of my code interfering (it's a highly ajax-driven pages). Switching the <strong> to a <span> with a style applied corrected the issue, so I guess it's a non-problem now.
This seems to work just fine. Also as Jed asked, What's the strong tag?
http://jsfiddle.net/NiceGuy4263/MjGKL/
<span name="xxx"> is not standard. Try using <span id="xxx"> instead.
Do you mean
var tripID = $('strong[name=tripID]').text();
or
var tripID = $('span[name=tripID]').text();
jQuery returns all the elements $('span[name=tripID]') and foreach compute the text, so if you have 3 $('span[name=tripID]') all with 10 in it, it will return 101010.
I would suggest to give a class, or, even better, an ID
Trip ID: <span name="tripID" id="tripID">10</span>
...
<script type="text/javascript">
...
var tripID = $('#tripID').text();
alert(tripID);
</script>
Rather than trying to create tons of different pages on my website, I'm trying to update the content of a single div when different items in the navbar are click to update the maint div content. I tried to find a simple example using Javascript:
<script type="text/javascript">
function ReplaceContentInContainer(id,content) {
var container = document.getElementById(id);
container.innerHTML = content;
}
</script>
<div id="example1div" style="border-style:solid; padding:10px; text-align:center;">
I will be replaced when you click.
</div>
<a href="javascript:ReplaceContentInContainer('example1div', '<img src='2.jpg'>' )">
Click me to replace the content in the container.
</a>
This works just fine when I only try and update text, but when I put an img tag in there, as you can see, it stops working.
Either
1) what is the problem with how I am trying to do it?
or 2) What is a better/easier way to do it?
I'm not stuck on Javascript. jQuery would work too, as long as it is just as simple or easy. I want to create a function that will just let me pass in whatever HTML I want to update and insert it into the div tag and take out the 'old' HTML.
You just have some escaping issues:
ReplaceContentInContainer('example1div', '<img src='2.jpg'>')
^ ^
The inner ' need to be escaped, otherwise the JS engine will see ReplaceContentInContainer('example1div', '<img src=' plus some syntax errors resulting from the subsequent 2.jpg'>'). Change the call to (tip of the hat to cHao' answer concerning escaping the < and > in the HTML):
ReplaceContentInContainer('example1div', '<img src=\'2.jpg\'>')
A simple way to do this with jQuery would be to add an ID to your link (say, "idOfA"), then use the html() function (this is more cross-platform than using innerHTML):
<script type="text/javascript">
$('#idOfA').click(function() {
$('#example1div').html('<img src="2.jpg">');
});
</script>
First of all, don't put complex JavaScript code in href attributes. It's hard to read or to maintain. Use the <script> tag or put your JavaScript code in a separate file altogether.
Second, use jQuery. JavaScript is a strange beast: the principles underlying its patterns were not designed with modern-day web development in mind. jQuery gives you lots of power without miring you in JavaScript's oddities.
Third, if your goal is to avoid having to endlessly duplicate the same basic structure for all (or many) of your pages, consider using a templating system. Templating systems allow you to plug in specific content into scaffolds containing the common elements of your site. If it sounds complicated, it's because I haven't explained it well. Google it and you'll find lots of great resources.
Relying on JavaScript for navigation means your site won't be indexed properly by search engines and will be completely unusable to someone with JavaScript turned off. It is increasingly common--and acceptable--to rely on JavaScript for basic functionality. But your site should, at minimum, provide discrete pages with sensible and durable URLs.
Now, all that said, let's get to your question. Here's one way of implementing it in jQuery. It's not the snazziest, tightest implementation, but I tried to make something very readable:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>jQuery Example</title>
<style type="text/css" media="all">
/* all content divs should be hidden initially */
.content {
display: none;
}
/* make the navigation bar stand out a little */
#nav {
background: yellow;
padding: 10px;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<!-- navigation bar -->
<span id="nav">
about me |
copyright notice |
a story
</span>
<!-- content divs -->
<div class="content" id="about_me">
<p>I'm a <strong>web developer</strong>!</p>
</div>
<div class="content" id="copyright">
<p>This site is in the public domain.</p>
<p>You can do whatever you want with it!</p>
</div>
<div class="content" id="my_story">
<p>Once upon a time...</p>
</div>
<!-- jquery code -->
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.5.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
// Wait for the document to load
$(document).ready(function() {
// When one of our nav links is clicked on,
$('#nav a').click(function(e) {
div_to_activate = $(this).attr('href'); // Store its target
$('.content:visible').hide(); // Hide any visible div with the class "content"
$(div_to_activate).show(); // Show the target div
});
});
</script>
</body>
</html>
Ok, hope this helps! If jQuery looks attractive, consider starting with this tutorial.
Your main problem with your example (besides that innerHTML is not always supported) is that < and > can easily break HTML if they're not escaped. Use < and > instead. (Don't worry, they'll be decoded before the JS sees them.) You can use the same trick with quotes (use " instead of " to get around quote issues).